<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bartlett Falsely Claims Bush Supports Full Investigation of &#8216;Any Allegation of Public Corruption&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:21:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wayne A. Schneider</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/comment-page-1/#comment-578019</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne A. Schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 18:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/#comment-578019</guid>
		<description>Dan Bartlett is a liar.  He once tried to claim that the Bush Administration was a very open one with no secrets.  Either he was completely ignorant of the truth, or he was lying.  (Thank you, John Dean, for that tidbit.)  I can understand why Fox News Channel might want to have someone of his ilk on their shows, but why would any other news organizations concerned about its reputation for accuracy and reliability want to even bother talking to this man?  He frequently tells lies (at least, every time that I have seen him talking on TV, I&#039;ve heard him assert at least one thing that was just plain false), so you can&#039;t be thinking that you&#039;ll get an accurate account of things from him.  His job is to go out to the media and try to make his president look good, even if the facts indicate otherwise.  He has no problem whatsoever with telling flat out lies.  As a source for accurate information, I wish the media would learn that Dan Bartlett is the wrong man to go to.  (And if they are worried about protecting &quot;access&quot; to these people, I ask, &quot;Why?&quot;  Why do you want to protect access to people who are going to lie to you?  I would think you would want to write them off as a source if you can&#039;t believe anything they tell you.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan Bartlett is a liar.  He once tried to claim that the Bush Administration was a very open one with no secrets.  Either he was completely ignorant of the truth, or he was lying.  (Thank you, John Dean, for that tidbit.)  I can understand why Fox News Channel might want to have someone of his ilk on their shows, but why would any other news organizations concerned about its reputation for accuracy and reliability want to even bother talking to this man?  He frequently tells lies (at least, every time that I have seen him talking on TV, I&#8217;ve heard him assert at least one thing that was just plain false), so you can&#8217;t be thinking that you&#8217;ll get an accurate account of things from him.  His job is to go out to the media and try to make his president look good, even if the facts indicate otherwise.  He has no problem whatsoever with telling flat out lies.  As a source for accurate information, I wish the media would learn that Dan Bartlett is the wrong man to go to.  (And if they are worried about protecting &#8220;access&#8221; to these people, I ask, &#8220;Why?&#8221;  Why do you want to protect access to people who are going to lie to you?  I would think you would want to write them off as a source if you can&#8217;t believe anything they tell you.)<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=578019', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KJ Lovell</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/comment-page-1/#comment-577980</link>
		<dc:creator>KJ Lovell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 18:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/#comment-577980</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t bartlett one of the co-conspiritors on the Plame case?  I believe he is classified as a non-indicted co-conspiritor.

But never forget, bush said &quot;...the Constitution is just a Godda**ed piece of paper&quot;
Never forget, gonzoles siad the Constitution is an &quot;outdated document&quot;

Lovely people to have spying on you and spiriting you away to torture you at concentration camps.

Dumbya is the male equivilent to Kelly Bundy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t bartlett one of the co-conspiritors on the Plame case?  I believe he is classified as a non-indicted co-conspiritor.</p>
<p>But never forget, bush said &#8220;&#8230;the Constitution is just a Godda**ed piece of paper&#8221;<br />
Never forget, gonzoles siad the Constitution is an &#8220;outdated document&#8221;</p>
<p>Lovely people to have spying on you and spiriting you away to torture you at concentration camps.</p>
<p>Dumbya is the male equivilent to Kelly Bundy.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=577980', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Briseadh na Faire</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/comment-page-1/#comment-577883</link>
		<dc:creator>Briseadh na Faire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 18:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/#comment-577883</guid>
		<description>Seixon, speaking of the FBI:


&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/27/jefferson.fbi/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Political dispute over FBI raid nears showdown&lt;/a&gt;
Sources: Justice officials threaten to resign over House office raid
From John King
CNN Chief National Correspondent


Saturday, May 27, 2006; Posted: 12:50 p.m. EDT (16:50 GMT) 

 WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Two senior administration officials said the showdown over the FBI&#039;s raid of Rep. William Jefferson&#039;s office last weekend had reached what one called &quot;the tipping point,&quot; with threats of high-level resignations.

Top Justice Department officials --Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty and FBI Director Robert Mueller --indicated they would resign if forced to give the seized materials back, the officials said.&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Now, judging from what has been in the media thus far, Jefferson should be investigated for his alleged criminal activity. However, the search of his Congressional Office would likely not have raised such concerns had an independent prosecutor been appointed for the task. 

As it stands now, we have a Republican controled Executive Branch searching the office of, and seizing records of a Congressman of the opposition party. 

On the other hand, although several Republican Congressmen have been implicated and even charged with criminal activity, there has been no reported incidences of their Congressional offices being searched by the FBI.

When the opposition party ascends to power will your position on the propriety of this Administration&#039;s actions remain the same? Will you support a Democratic President and a Democratic Congress doing the same things to Republicans? Will you accept a Democratic majority on the Supreme Court upholding these activities against Republicans?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seixon, speaking of the FBI:</p>
<blockquote><p>
<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/27/jefferson.fbi/index.html" rel="nofollow">Political dispute over FBI raid nears showdown</a><br />
Sources: Justice officials threaten to resign over House office raid<br />
From John King<br />
CNN Chief National Correspondent</p>
<p>Saturday, May 27, 2006; Posted: 12:50 p.m. EDT (16:50 GMT) </p>
<p> WASHINGTON (CNN) &#8212; Two senior administration officials said the showdown over the FBI&#8217;s raid of Rep. William Jefferson&#8217;s office last weekend had reached what one called &#8220;the tipping point,&#8221; with threats of high-level resignations.</p>
<p>Top Justice Department officials &#8211;Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty and FBI Director Robert Mueller &#8211;indicated they would resign if forced to give the seized materials back, the officials said.</p></blockquote>
<p>Now, judging from what has been in the media thus far, Jefferson should be investigated for his alleged criminal activity. However, the search of his Congressional Office would likely not have raised such concerns had an independent prosecutor been appointed for the task. </p>
<p>As it stands now, we have a Republican controled Executive Branch searching the office of, and seizing records of a Congressman of the opposition party. </p>
<p>On the other hand, although several Republican Congressmen have been implicated and even charged with criminal activity, there has been no reported incidences of their Congressional offices being searched by the FBI.</p>
<p>When the opposition party ascends to power will your position on the propriety of this Administration&#8217;s actions remain the same? Will you support a Democratic President and a Democratic Congress doing the same things to Republicans? Will you accept a Democratic majority on the Supreme Court upholding these activities against Republicans?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=577883', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seixon</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/comment-page-1/#comment-577684</link>
		<dc:creator>Seixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 17:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/#comment-577684</guid>
		<description>I suppose that is different than Think Progress and others deciding that the photos are relevant. Oh wait...  no it&#039;s not!

Photos of the president with Abramoff in the picture doesn&#039;t prove anything. Documents or other things will. So obviously the photos are just some distraction for people like Think Progress, while the FBI are adults and know how to do their job and find things that are actually relevant to establishing corruption.

Talk about the pinnacle of hypocrisy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose that is different than Think Progress and others deciding that the photos are relevant. Oh wait&#8230;  no it&#8217;s not!</p>
<p>Photos of the president with Abramoff in the picture doesn&#8217;t prove anything. Documents or other things will. So obviously the photos are just some distraction for people like Think Progress, while the FBI are adults and know how to do their job and find things that are actually relevant to establishing corruption.</p>
<p>Talk about the pinnacle of hypocrisy.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=577684', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebelese</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/comment-page-1/#comment-577286</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebelese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 14:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/#comment-577286</guid>
		<description>Hayden was approved simply because the WH has all the dirt on all the senate that it needs.

Specter voting against with approval from the gray house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hayden was approved simply because the WH has all the dirt on all the senate that it needs.</p>
<p>Specter voting against with approval from the gray house.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=577286', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jiggs Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/comment-page-1/#comment-577271</link>
		<dc:creator>Jiggs Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 13:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/#comment-577271</guid>
		<description>Viva Zapata and Tex-Mex justice with sour cream on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Viva Zapata and Tex-Mex justice with sour cream on it.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=577271', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cats are flyfishn</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/comment-page-1/#comment-577265</link>
		<dc:creator>cats are flyfishn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 12:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/#comment-577265</guid>
		<description>We will persue all leads as long as they don&#039;t involve investigating Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and George W Bush, he, he, he, he.

Signed &quot;W&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We will persue all leads as long as they don&#8217;t involve investigating Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and George W Bush, he, he, he, he.</p>
<p>Signed &#8220;W&#8221;.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=577265', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bluestocking</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/comment-page-1/#comment-577261</link>
		<dc:creator>Bluestocking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 12:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/#comment-577261</guid>
		<description>&quot;...itâ€™s critically important that...anytime that thereâ€™s any allegation of public corruption of a public official or a congressman, that we do everything we can to fully investigate this.&quot;

****************

Since &lt;em&gt;when?!?&lt;/em&gt;  Yeah, right -- if you believe that, I happen to know of this great bridge on the East River which just happens to be for sale at a very reasonable price....

Yeah, I&#039;m sure they do everything they can to &#039;fully investigate it&quot; provided that it&#039;s not a Republican...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;itâ€™s critically important that&#8230;anytime that thereâ€™s any allegation of public corruption of a public official or a congressman, that we do everything we can to fully investigate this.&#8221;</p>
<p>****************</p>
<p>Since <em>when?!?</em>  Yeah, right &#8212; if you believe that, I happen to know of this great bridge on the East River which just happens to be for sale at a very reasonable price&#8230;.</p>
<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m sure they do everything they can to &#8216;fully investigate it&#8221; provided that it&#8217;s not a Republican&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=577261', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Randal</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/comment-page-1/#comment-577127</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Randal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 06:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/#comment-577127</guid>
		<description>Post 31 &gt; you could be correct because NSA spied on every member of the Congress, so Hayden had material to blackmail most of the Senators! Strange vote yesterday because it was done fast and then the Senators rushed out of DC like the devil was after them &gt; lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Post 31 &gt; you could be correct because NSA spied on every member of the Congress, so Hayden had material to blackmail most of the Senators! Strange vote yesterday because it was done fast and then the Senators rushed out of DC like the devil was after them &gt; lol.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=577127', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KJ Lovell</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/comment-page-1/#comment-577126</link>
		<dc:creator>KJ Lovell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 06:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/#comment-577126</guid>
		<description>#15 Jay, you know exactly why  Hayden got all the votes - Blackmail.  It is the same old story, from 1989 to present (before 1989 but never reported).  The corrupt &quot;power players&quot; throw sex parties with underage objects of desire and photograph it and video tape it.  It exploded in 1989 and got quickly covered up.  

Why the heck do you think DeLay would go around the floor and talk to the voters and some cry while casting the votes to approve bad legislation.  Remember not to long ago....that was the one that the democrats were chanting &quot;shame, shame, shame&quot; over.

And #26 - Yes the president does take an oath to uphold the constitution, and when we find that he is not fulfilling that duty, he should be immediately removed from power using whatever means necessary.  This little smirking chimp is on record saying : &quot; the Constitution is just a godammed piece of paper.&quot; and Alberto-I love torture-Gonzoles is on record as saying that the constitution is an &quot;outdated document&quot;  so why are these Nazis still in power?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#15 Jay, you know exactly why  Hayden got all the votes &#8211; Blackmail.  It is the same old story, from 1989 to present (before 1989 but never reported).  The corrupt &#8220;power players&#8221; throw sex parties with underage objects of desire and photograph it and video tape it.  It exploded in 1989 and got quickly covered up.  </p>
<p>Why the heck do you think DeLay would go around the floor and talk to the voters and some cry while casting the votes to approve bad legislation.  Remember not to long ago&#8230;.that was the one that the democrats were chanting &#8220;shame, shame, shame&#8221; over.</p>
<p>And #26 &#8211; Yes the president does take an oath to uphold the constitution, and when we find that he is not fulfilling that duty, he should be immediately removed from power using whatever means necessary.  This little smirking chimp is on record saying : &#8221; the Constitution is just a godammed piece of paper.&#8221; and Alberto-I love torture-Gonzoles is on record as saying that the constitution is an &#8220;outdated document&#8221;  so why are these Nazis still in power?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=577126', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Randal</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/comment-page-1/#comment-577100</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Randal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 06:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/#comment-577100</guid>
		<description>Post 29 that is why they raided a Dems office to cause a stink so NO Repubs offices will be searched by the FBI! GOP has at least 10 Reps involved in scandals at the moment versus the Dems one with Jefferson!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Post 29 that is why they raided a Dems office to cause a stink so NO Repubs offices will be searched by the FBI! GOP has at least 10 Reps involved in scandals at the moment versus the Dems one with Jefferson!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=577100', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This is a real dumb country</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/comment-page-1/#comment-576983</link>
		<dc:creator>This is a real dumb country</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 05:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/#comment-576983</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it just a little stinky with all these corrupt republicans taking money for official acts that the Justice Department raids the office of a democrat?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it just a little stinky with all these corrupt republicans taking money for official acts that the Justice Department raids the office of a democrat?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=576983', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miro</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/comment-page-1/#comment-576925</link>
		<dc:creator>Miro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 05:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/#comment-576925</guid>
		<description>So I wondered for a moment, &quot;who the heck is he pandering to THIS time...&quot; -- turns out it was Gonzales he was pandering to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I wondered for a moment, &#8220;who the heck is he pandering to THIS time&#8230;&#8221; &#8212; turns out it was Gonzales he was pandering to.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=576925', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyra Brown</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/comment-page-1/#comment-576890</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyra Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 04:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/#comment-576890</guid>
		<description>Bartlett says,  &quot;it&#039;s critically important that this investigation continue.&quot; Oh, yes it is. I do not doubt his sincerity, not one little bit. But he is not interested in truth, justice, or the American way. Hardly. And GWB made sure this story will be a popular topic on Fox News, and psycho radio by freezing the FBI booty from Jefferson&#039;s office for 45 days. Not exactly the actions of a supporter of investigations. DETAILS!!! Jefferson needs to go. He needed the help of the FBI to get in trouble, while Republicans can take care of business all by themselves, no set-up required.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bartlett says,  &#8220;it&#8217;s critically important that this investigation continue.&#8221; Oh, yes it is. I do not doubt his sincerity, not one little bit. But he is not interested in truth, justice, or the American way. Hardly. And GWB made sure this story will be a popular topic on Fox News, and psycho radio by freezing the FBI booty from Jefferson&#8217;s office for 45 days. Not exactly the actions of a supporter of investigations. DETAILS!!! Jefferson needs to go. He needed the help of the FBI to get in trouble, while Republicans can take care of business all by themselves, no set-up required.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=576890', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clb72</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/comment-page-1/#comment-576791</link>
		<dc:creator>clb72</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 04:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/#comment-576791</guid>
		<description>&quot;If a monarchist be in office anywhere and it be known to the President, the oath he has taken to support the Constitution imperiously requires the instantaneous dismission of such officer; and I should hold the President criminal if he permitted such to remain. To appoint a monarchist to conduct the affairs of a republic is like appointing an atheist to the priesthood.&quot; --Thomas Jefferson: Newspaper letter, 1803. FE 8:237</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If a monarchist be in office anywhere and it be known to the President, the oath he has taken to support the Constitution imperiously requires the instantaneous dismission of such officer; and I should hold the President criminal if he permitted such to remain. To appoint a monarchist to conduct the affairs of a republic is like appointing an atheist to the priesthood.&#8221; &#8211;Thomas Jefferson: Newspaper letter, 1803. FE 8:237<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=576791', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Randal</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/comment-page-1/#comment-576647</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Randal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 03:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/#comment-576647</guid>
		<description>I am beginning to think that all the Senators and many of the Representatives in DC left skidmarks leaving on vacation today to clean up their homes and offices before the FBI searches them! Many of them are certified crooks so cash is probably in most of their freezers &gt; lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am beginning to think that all the Senators and many of the Representatives in DC left skidmarks leaving on vacation today to clean up their homes and offices before the FBI searches them! Many of them are certified crooks so cash is probably in most of their freezers &gt; lol.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=576647', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kimmy</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/comment-page-1/#comment-576633</link>
		<dc:creator>kimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 03:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/#comment-576633</guid>
		<description>I hope Bush is pleasured!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope Bush is pleasured!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=576633', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katy</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/comment-page-1/#comment-576631</link>
		<dc:creator>katy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 02:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/#comment-576631</guid>
		<description>kimmy - i googled the oft heard phrase &quot;i serve at the pleasure of the president&quot; and after 10 or so pages i&#039;m still not sure if it started on The West Wing tv show and has been popular since or if it is an historical phrase... but rummy&#039;s remark was probably condensed from that phrase... and it means what it says...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kimmy &#8211; i googled the oft heard phrase &#8220;i serve at the pleasure of the president&#8221; and after 10 or so pages i&#8217;m still not sure if it started on The West Wing tv show and has been popular since or if it is an historical phrase&#8230; but rummy&#8217;s remark was probably condensed from that phrase&#8230; and it means what it says&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=576631', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katy</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/comment-page-1/#comment-576623</link>
		<dc:creator>katy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 02:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/#comment-576623</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;...itâ€™s critically important that this investigation continue; that anytime that thereâ€™s any allegation of &lt;strong&gt;public corruption of a public official or a congressman&lt;/strong&gt;, that we do everything we can to fully investigate this.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;
A very sound principle â€” one that unfortunately does not apply to President Bush. 

or rove or cheney or delay or frist or the &lt;a href=&quot;http://thinkprogress.org/the-architects-where-are-they-now/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;iraq war architects&lt;/a&gt; or anyone else on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thinkprogress.org/leak-scandal&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;cia leak list&quot;&lt;/a&gt; and everyone else i&#039;m sure i&#039;ve left out...
you get the idea...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;&#8230;itâ€™s critically important that this investigation continue; that anytime that thereâ€™s any allegation of <strong>public corruption of a public official or a congressman</strong>, that we do everything we can to fully investigate this.&#8221;</em><br />
A very sound principle â€” one that unfortunately does not apply to President Bush. </p>
<p>or rove or cheney or delay or frist or the <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/the-architects-where-are-they-now/" rel="nofollow">iraq war architects</a> or anyone else on the <a href="http://www.thinkprogress.org/leak-scandal" rel="nofollow">&#8220;cia leak list&#8221;</a> and everyone else i&#8217;m sure i&#8217;ve left out&#8230;<br />
you get the idea&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=576623', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Almost Boiled Frog</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/comment-page-1/#comment-576601</link>
		<dc:creator>Almost Boiled Frog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 02:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/26/bartlett-falsely-claims-bush-supports-investigation-of-any-allegation-of-public-corruption/#comment-576601</guid>
		<description>Re: &quot;Here is a man who has admitted guilt to some egregious conduct and behavior in the course of several years.&quot;

Which one is he talking about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: &#8220;Here is a man who has admitted guilt to some egregious conduct and behavior in the course of several years.&#8221;</p>
<p>Which one is he talking about?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=576601', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
