1. Referring to your opponents as “nazis” is juvenile in the extreme.

2. Yes, there is a carbon cycle. And you would make a lousy accountant. Burning fossil fuels adds more carbon in the carbon cycle than was originally there. This is, as you say, first grade stuff.

3. Weather changes. Climate has trends. Moreover, the climate has been remarkably stable for about the last 10,000 years, making agriculture, and thus civilisation possible.

4. Regarding sun intensity, the sun is about 25% more intense now than during the age of the dinosaurs when the Earth was much hotter (and had more CO2 in the atmosphere). The “solar intensity argument is a debunked one that was first put forward by a woman who was on the payroll of the oil companies.

Furthermore Physikalisch-Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos (http://www.pmodwrc.ch/pmod.php?topic=tsi/composite/SolarConstant) show us that ther has been no increase in solar irradiance from 1978 onward when they started monitoring.

5. You cannot plant enough trees to uptake all the additional carbon in the atmosphere. The old argument (over 100 years old) was that the oceans would take up the CO2. Well, to an extent they are. And that is causing the formation of carbonic acid, which is killing off sea life.

And, trees have a moderating effect. They tend to warm cool air and cool warm air.

So, seeing as how every counter-argument you made was wrong, next time please consider holding your breath…

The earths temp has always been changing and will always do so… i.e…. Past oceans are now deserts. Lets suppose you are sitting on your coach and your house began getting to warm. Would you sit there and swear that there was to much CO2 warming the house? No, you would get up and walk to the thermostat and turn down the heat! Why would you do that? Because it is your furnace heating your home… Guess what, we get our heat from the sun, the solar cycles match our past hot and cool stages… Hmmmm… Sounds logical to me… Hotter sun = Warmer Earth…

That makes as much sense as a “scientist” telling half the truth or declaring worst case scenarios to recieve his grants… Many are just trying to collect thier paycheck and look for “science” to justify thier existence while ignoring conflicting facts to thier belief system…

That being said you may have a valid point about CO2 holding in the heat. The solution then would be to plant more trees, or let nature take its course and let the plants catch up with our CO2 output… Unless all that shade led to global cooling…

PS; CO2(Carbon Dioxide, the global warming gas) is also used for carbonation in soda so fear the poison, and please consider holding your breath…

# 152 Dreda: What unbelievable said in 153.

One thread does not represent the entire site.

And instead of doing exactly what you just criticized everyone else for doing – why don’t you offer some dazzling commentary? Or can you?

Do you not realize that this is a place where people debate issues? If you are too sensitive to hear an opposing view, then find a place more sugar-coated. It gets heated around here…

You have no basis for being self-righteous, and then expecting sympathy or pity or whatever it is you want. As the adage goes – if you want to be loved, then be lovable. And in this case – if you want to be ignored – then ignore. But that’s not what you did. And as much as you say it’s what you want – it’s not what your actions are saying now.

Is your opinion always truth?

You started harrassing me. Not the other way around. You stop being an ass, then I’ll stop making fun of you. Clear enough?

And talking about yourself in the third person is creepy. You’re already creepy enough…

Hold your breath while you wait…

You’re the one who follows me around, not the other way around as your demented mind perverts reality time and time again. I don’t reference you – you’re a pathetic joke.

If you don’t like me so much, then why do you keep talking to me? I’ll tell you why – you have nothing of value to say. Only attacks on people who you do. Pathetic.

Ah, an ad hominem attack when you can’t argue the facts… We know that trick and see through it.

I suggest you do some resaerch before you open your mouth next time. One democrat with his hand in the cookie jars doesn’t erase the multiude of Repugs with theirs…

Dude,save your breath with that unbelievable woman.
That spinster is wack;you’ll find out.

Now to unbelievable,I meant ‘leave me alone’and that includes you invoking my name all the time.What’s wrong,you miss me or something?Don’t like being ignored?
You know that you didn’t defeat me,you can’t.I’m out here and lovin’every minute of it.
Now I’ll wait for your name calling to begin.

If anyone can explain what “Unbelievable’s” rant is supposed to mean, please do so.