Coulter on 9/11 Widows: ‘I Have Never Seen People Enjoying their Husbands’ Death So Much’
Coulter on 9/11 Widows: ‘I Have Never Seen People Enjoying their Husbands’ Death So Much’
In her new book, “Godless,” right-wing pundit Ann Coulter writes of the 9/11 widows:
These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by grief-arazzies. I have never seen people enjoying their husbands’ death so much.
She was confronted about the statement this morning by NBC’s Matt Lauer. Coulter accused Lauer of “getting testy.” Watch it:
Full Transcript:
LAUER: Do you believe everything in the book or do you put some things in there just to cater to your base?
ANN: No, of course I believe everything.
LAUER: On the 9-11 widows, an in particular a group that had been critical of the administration: “These self-obsessed women seem genuinely unaware that 9-11 was an attack on our nation and acted like as if the terrorist attack only happened to them. They believe the entire country was required to marinate in their exquisite personal agony. Apparently, denouncing bush was part of the closure process.” And this part is the part I really need to talk to you about: “These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by griefparrazies. I have never seen people enjoying their husband’s death so much.” Because they dare to speak out?
COULTER: To speak out using the fact they are widows. This is the left’s doctrine of infallibility. If they have a point to make about the 9-11 commission, about how to fight the war on terrorism, how about sending in somebody we are allowed to respond to. No. No. No. We have to respond to someone who had a family member die. Because then if we respond, oh you are questioning their authenticity.
LAUER: So grieve but grieve quietly?
COULTER: No, the story is an attack on the nation. That requires a foreign policy response.
LAUER: By the way, they also criticized the Clinton administration.
COULTER: Not the ones I am talking about. No, no, no.
LAUER: Yeah they have.
COULTER: Oh no, no, no, no, no. They were cutting commercials for Kerry. They were using their grief to make a political point while preventing anyone from responding.
LAUER: So if you lose a husband, you no longer have the right to have a political point of view?
COULTER: No, but don’t use the fact that you lost a husband as the basis for being able to talk about, while preventing people from responding. Let Matt Lauer make the point. Let Bill Clinton make the point. Don’t put up someone I am not allowed to respond to without questioning the authenticity of their grief.
LAUER: Well apparently you are allowed to respond to them.
COULTER: Yeah, I did.
LAUER: So, in other words.
COULTER: That is the point of liberal infallibility. Of putting up Cindy Sheehan, of putting out these widows, of putting out Joe Wilson. No, no, no. You can’t respond. It’s their doctrine of infallibility. Have someone else make the argument then.
LAUER: What I’m saying is I don’t think they have ever told you, you can’t respond.
COULTER: Look, you are getting testy with me.
LAUER: No. I think it’s a dramatic statement. “These broads are millionaires stalked by stalked by grief-parazzies”? “I have never seen people enjoying their husband’s deaths so much”?
COULTER: Yes, they are all over the news.
LAUER: The book is called “Godless: The Church of Liberalism.” Ann Coulter, always fun to have you here.
she’s screwing up america more than all the 100 people bernie goldberg wrote about.
June 6th, 2006 at 9:45 amI wish Ann Coulter was on the morning shows every morning, what a shell of a human being.
June 6th, 2006 at 9:46 amMy what a huge Adam’s apple. One would think of AIS.
June 6th, 2006 at 9:49 am[...] Now, Think Progress has a transcript of Coulter & Lauer discussing how the media uses 9/11 widows as experts, but doesn’t allow conservatives to respond. Their title – “Coulter on 9/11 Widows: ‘I Have Never Seen People Enjoying their Husbands’ Death So Much’” [...]
June 6th, 2006 at 9:51 amCoulter is showing signs of cracking.
June 6th, 2006 at 9:52 amKatie’s gone so Matt has a new set of Cajone’s….Awesome!!!
man coulter… not worth using the energy to type about…
June 6th, 2006 at 9:53 am“no no no no no no no no no no no no, wait, what was I talking about? oh yeah: no no no no no no no no liberal infallibility no no no no no….”
When is she going to be on The Daily show?
June 6th, 2006 at 9:53 amI doubt that she even believes the crap she spews. By being outrageous she sells books. That is all she cares about. After all its all about her.
June 6th, 2006 at 9:53 amShe’e mentally ill and so are the people who give her air time.
June 6th, 2006 at 9:55 amYep it’s all about money and as sad as it is people pony up $20 once a year to buy her new book. But ignorant people buy a lot of books, the Left Behind series comes to mind.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:00 ami can just see jon stewart vomit on her infront of everybody… he he he
June 6th, 2006 at 10:02 amThis scum bag gets $30,000 for her appearences. Think she’d get that kind of money if she was anything approaching thoughtful and a non arsehole?
Like the fat Oxy cotin addict there is never too low these scum bags can go….. and it pays so well.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:03 ami am no longer surprised by anything ann coulter says. her evil character is highly predictalble. but lauer’s final “ann coulter always fun to have you here” was outrageous.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:04 amMatt let her off easy. Everything the woman writes is one gigantic ad hominem attack. Someone needs to remind the viewing audience that it’s a logical fallacy, in addition to being pretty despicable.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:04 amSo Ann Coulter’s argument is that she can make political points off of 9/11 because her nation was attacked, but people who “only” lost spouses in the attack are politicizing their grief. Oh, and “these broads are millionaires”? How much has Coulter made off of the country’s emotional response to 9/11?
June 6th, 2006 at 10:05 amIs my memory failing me or was her first book a guide to dating in Washington? I’m glad that’s she’s moved on to making meaningful contributions to society now……/sarcasm
June 6th, 2006 at 10:05 amThis is not news. Why does the MSM and blogs not have the sense to put people like this on ignore? She is making $$$ by filling time with nonsense that isn’t worth any time and definitely not worth a penny.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:05 am#11 Vomitting was the first thing I thought of when I saw her ragged mug.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:06 amDear Ann Coulter
Please kill yourself. Now.
Sincerely,
June 6th, 2006 at 10:06 amThe World
Ann Coulter is a man:
http://www.smirkingchimp.com/viewtopic.php?topic=54203&forum=4
Take a look at this pic and judge for yourself.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:06 amShe serves a purpose in being so over-the-top extreme. She makes the extreme right wing look more moderate, so they can function more easily without being called out. She functions as a clown to make the real clowns look better.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:06 amShe believes every word. Ann is pissed that the 9/11 widows can’t be attacked in the same way that others critical of this administration are attacked. She and anyone else who wants to swift boat the widows can’t do it without looking like asses. They would rather someone that is open to attack from the right be the ones out front on this issue. That is the complaint. Read her words carefully. Jeez, I thought progressives were supposed to be the whiners. LMAO
June 6th, 2006 at 10:07 amOne of her nutbag friends should tell the skank to get a new dress.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:07 amWas she asked about her possible upcoming felony conviction for voter fraud?
June 6th, 2006 at 10:08 amI agree with comment #9, the woman is clearly mentally ill. I can’t imagine even Republicans take her seriously. If someone capped her parents I wonder if she would be will to suffer silently.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:08 amShe should be forced to meet with the 911 widows (and widowers) face to face. Then she should be sent to Iraq for 6 tours of duty.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:10 amShe should be forced to meet with the 911 widows (and widowers) face to face. Then she should face the survivors of Fallujah . . .
June 6th, 2006 at 10:11 amBut her book isn’t selling. At all. I think I heard that only she and her family have purchased copies. Hard to believe that she and Bill Mahar used to be an item.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:11 amThis broad is CRAZY!
June 6th, 2006 at 10:12 amJust had a flash of Kristin Bratweiler kicking the crap out of her…
What a day for a daydream.
50 Ways To Dump The Dubya
June 6th, 2006 at 10:14 amMy what a huge Adam’s apple. One would think of AIS.
Comment by yankeluh — June 6, 2006
Of course “she” has a large adams apple. When you have the “operation” getting your masculine larinyx shaved down is an elective surgery that is quite expensive.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:17 amWhat a f’in idiot. Coulter never ceases to shock me with the crap-etoric she spouts.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:18 amConvenient of her to forget that there were some conservative 9/11 widows doing the same thing as the liberal ones. Frankly, its hard to imagine a more disgusting statement from a conservative, but I’m sure she’ll figure out a way to top this one.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:18 amWhat we need is a media that understands that there is a visual story to show, the shocking sight of these cynical leaders, like Coulter, showing them in the back rooms (that occur between their ‘Glory moments’ in front of the TV cameras) when back stage they have their addiction fits where they’re “jonesing†for their next fix of meanness and greed.
That’s what we need to convince the media to show. The true tawdry underbelly of this destructive movement.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:18 amwhy does the today show legitimize her?
June 6th, 2006 at 10:19 amThe entire premise of Ann’s argument is that which is the foundation of the Swiftboat Veterans for Truth…and yet, something tells me she’s a big fan of them.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:19 amNo one benefitted more from 9/11 than the PNAC cabal. And the pre-knowledge for the attacks were there. Atleast 11 countries warned, including the taliban and in the recent Moussaoui trial a FBI agent admitted that the plans were known for years.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:20 amBut she might infact be unaware since she had no one who Lewis Libby was. Idiot. Phoney cherry pick parts from the bible fool. Thou make mockery of thy religion.
God bless the Jersey Girls…atleast they were part to start the 9/11 whitewash commission.
So, I guess this is that “compassionate conservativism” I’ve been hearing so much about.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:21 amThe direct families of 9/11 victims received VARIED COMPENSATION. The ‘formula’ was based on lost future earnings which lead to the families of investment bankers, brokers, etc getting much larger ‘payouts’ than the families of a janitor, secretary, etc.
That was one of the rather large ‘injustices’ of the federal insurance program that was specifically designed to keep airlines from being sued by relatives (the fed insurance payouts were their only real recourse).
So…not all 9/11 widows are ‘equal’ in wealth.
Ann also apparently has trouble recognizing that people can and do buy insurance with million dollar payouts. I know I am insured for 1 million as long and as long as I don’t kill myself my family will get the money to help them to live on until they can move on.
9/11 was facilitated by the incompetence of the federal government coupled with airline responsibility for security. To suggest that they should not have received compensation for an event that should never have happened is obscene.
Oh, and Ann – if and when your new home (in the precinct you should have registered in) gets blown over by a hurricane I’m sure you’ll feel ‘entitled’ to the federal disaster benefits that essentially allow people (rich people) to live in areas that are not insurable privately.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:24 amI really think the best way of dealing with Ann Coulter is to ignore her. By continually discussing her we give her a certain amount of credibility. In my opinion she’s just a stupid blowhard who desparately wants to be famous. She purposely says things like this to get attention — and her hate-filled followers just lap it up. If we pretend she doesn’t exist we can diminish whatever stature she has. I’m sure Ann Coulter would hate nothing more than to be ignored.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:25 amThis douchebag has no business being on national TV promoting anything. Full stop.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:25 amCoulter is a sick and evil male drag queen who should be given a prison term for fomenting hatred and bigotry!
June 6th, 2006 at 10:26 amMake it stop…it burns, it burns!!
June 6th, 2006 at 10:26 amTro. Glo. Dyte.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:28 amWho does this Ann Coulter guy think he is, anyway? If Ann Coulter didn’t want people to think “she” was a “he”, then maybe “she” should get a different e-mail address than tom@anncoulter.com.
If all these TV shows would stop having her come on, no matter how stupid or controversial the things she says are, then maybe she could go away and never be heard from again (which could only be good for the world.)
June 6th, 2006 at 10:31 amI saw her in walmart yesterday buying all of her books.
Oh yeah, in case you aren’t paying attention, the war in Iraq is lost. The best hope is to get out while the gettin’ is good. George Bush had better act fast.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:31 amThe premise upon which her whole book is based upon is a fallacy. There are LOTS of people of faith who are LIBERALS. I guess she considers Jesus “Godless” since he was a liberal???
June 6th, 2006 at 10:33 am“Anne, you ignorant slut…”
June 6th, 2006 at 10:33 amI am very sorry, I dislike this woman very much, the things she says are always flippaant it seems and now its so sad to hear her complain about not being heard as pens a book, is the darling of Fox news genre? She is very disingenuos at the least and not a very good role model for women at all.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:34 amGood job matt till he got to the tham\nks part at the end, she isnt fun, shes not informative, and not a very nice person at all.
Freekin right wing political hacks just cant figure out why 51% of Americans dont oppose gay marriage and 30% of Americans dislike the President (Jay Leno) as persons like coulter run their mouthds in such a manner, I suppose next she will desecrate funerals of returning casualties from Iraq/Afghanistan because it is an example of the griveing she holds in contmept?
enough said
June 6th, 2006 at 10:35 amhttp://911-for-dummies.blogspot.com/
she’s a man, baby. ah crikey… schizophrenic
June 6th, 2006 at 10:35 amThis douchebag has no business being on national TV promoting anything. Full stop.
I second Dr. Sinker’s emotion.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:35 amAnn for prezdint!
Who better can finish the work of our Fearaless Leader Little Bush.
The complete distruction of the United States of America.
She does make one want to spit up doesn’t she?
Icky
June 6th, 2006 at 10:37 amThe minute I heard that Coulter was going to be on the Today show this morning I reached for the remote control. Why would anyone want to start their day by listening to that viscious hate-monger. She laughs all the way to the bank as she destroys whatever little of civic discourse is left in this country.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:41 amIf only Anne would stop living in sin, whoring around, she may one day have a husband to mourn herself.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:43 amShe truly is the face of the Repub Party….she bascially says all the Politcally Incorrect crap the politicians and other “respectable” Con pundits cant say…what a dispicable human being…
So the 9/11 widows need to shut up because why???
I would love to see her debate Kristen Brewsmeister about the failures of this admin in the months leading up to 9-11 and the aftermath since 9-11
anyway…
Over at the swamp (Yahoo message boards) there is a story about the 9 severed heads found in a box in Iraq…..tragic…..
Because they have nothing else to crow about…all the CONS over there are raving that Ann’s book is #1…whoopee….however…upon further inspection its not that hard to have the #1 book when sites like this :
http://www.conservativebookclub.com/DefaultJoin.asp?
SELL THE BOOK FOR A DOLLAR!!!!
June 6th, 2006 at 10:47 amI had to watch the whole thing this morning in a mirror, so I wouldn’t immediately turn to stone. Or is it a pillar of salt? I keeps gettin’ mah mythology and bibology references mixed up…
June 6th, 2006 at 10:50 amAnn Coulter reminds me of a crack whore I used to know. Except I felt sympathy for the crack whore. And the crack whore was a woman.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:51 amCoulter is showing signs of cracking.
I think that was just her make-up. Annie the trannie isn’t at her best at 7am: she looked as rough as a badger’s backside this morning, and was not up to full trolling speed.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:51 amDear Ann,
Two questions –
First, how does it feel to be about to lose your right to vote as an American citizen?
Second, what kind of cheese goes with that whine?
(BTW, loved the articles about you on Bradblog)
June 6th, 2006 at 10:52 amI have to give Matt Lauer props, as I have been a critic of his past interviews….He exposed Coulter as clearly insane or a shameless panderer to sell books…Did you watch Kathy Griffin later..”What’s with having that nutbag Ann Coulter on…Why was she wearing a cocktail dress for a morning show…I think she just makes stuff up…”
June 6th, 2006 at 10:53 amThe sad thing is that we are even discussing this. It’s even sadder that she is given air time. Where is her radical left counterpart in the MSM? Michael Moore pales in comparison. Daily we are inundated with neo-fascist propaganda- and yet all we do is complain about it on blogs.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:53 amShe looks like a hooker.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:55 amFrankly, its hard to imagine a more disgusting statement from a conservative, but I’m sure she’ll figure out a way to top this one.
Comment by Hit_Escape — June 6, 2006 @ 10:18 am
She is NOT a real conservative, you do realize. She simply masquerades as being conservative or republican, or whatever…in reality though, she is just a nasty excuse for a human being, and panders to the same. They just always seem to yell the loudest. That’s all.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:59 amShe embarrasses herself and anyone with whom she claims allegiance every time she speaks. I’ve never heard someone spew such unexamined (and easily refuted) arguments so chronically.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:59 am#62 – I HOPE someone posts a video of Kathy Griffin’s response. That sounds hilarious.
I’d LOVE to see Kathy Griffin and Ann Coulter in a cage match. Kathy would tear Ann a new one (and be funny while doing it).
June 6th, 2006 at 10:59 amSo, what she is saying that only shinny, happy people can complain about what has happened in the country. People who grieves, who works in 3 places just to pay the rent, who has lost relatives in the war…well, that´s life. What a really piece of garbage.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:00 amI think she is just entertaining like a sad clown. Who reads her crap nazi propaganda anyway.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:00 amI’m glad she clarified that only the 9/11 widows who disagree with her need to shut up. The rest can talk with authority.
Rather than not being allowed to respond, I think what she meant is she is not allowed to respond without looking like a heartless bloodthirsty fascist whore. She would look good in a Nazi uniform and whip presiding over one of the many domestic internment camps her fellow conservatives are pushing for.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:01 amAnn Coulter rejoices in venom and poison. It would be an interesting case to study for those who study the mysteries of the mind.
Me thinks that Ann Coulter always attacks when what she may deem the “infallibility” of George Bush and his PNAC friends is questioned.
She always speaks like an irascible lieutenant in love with his general!
June 6th, 2006 at 11:03 amWhy would they even have her on? I mean, why not have a Klan leader on? She’s not a serious political commentator or analyst. She’s just a hate monger. The wingnuts have taken politics into the gutter, and the corporate media has followed them right down into it.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:03 amAnn Coulter calling herself Tom for his emails is very revealing of who he actually is in reality!
A drag queen association located in Key West, Florida, claims convincingly that Ann Coulter was one of their male drag queens who got a sex change operation in Denmark several years ago! I forget what his queen name was in Key West, but his real first name is Tom! The press should be investigating his real identity instead of allowing him to spew hatred on FOX News!
June 6th, 2006 at 11:04 amLiberals DO have a doctrine of infallibility. It’s called fact.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:04 am64. She is a hooker. Instead of selling her body, she’s selling her hate to angry, lonely guys who have Fox News in their lives and little else.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:04 amGladly, I missed this morning’s show, but I would have loved to hear Kathy Griffin trash that hebitch Coulter. Kathy deserves to be on the A list.
If I ever met Mann Coulter at a party and there was a pool nearby, I’d push her sorry ass in that pool and jet out of there.
God, I hope Olbermann kicks her ass tonight.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:05 amI am really dumbfounded by how low TV has sunk. Jawdropping.
MATT LAUER: Always FUN to have you with us, Ann. Now we welcome Adolf Hilter, to talk about how much fun is to rip the skin off people while they’re still alive…
June 6th, 2006 at 11:06 amCoulter is pure white trash in the form of an X-File alien/human hybrid lab experiment gone bad (don’t they always.). She’s plain creepy.
Visit my blog: People For Progress
June 6th, 2006 at 11:06 amOkay, its not very good but it came to me in a flash.
Comment by Bruce Gorton
To Bruce,
June 6th, 2006 at 11:06 amNot bad at all.
During the height of the Monica Lewinsky scandal, I once heard a version of this song called “That’s why (illicit tape recorder) Linda is a Tripp,” but I don’t remember most of the lines, but it amused me at the time.
Did dumbass Lauer ask her about her impending indictment for voter fraud?
Didn’t think so.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:08 amAnn Coulter can be filed under the subset of human excrement.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:09 amAnn Coulter is finally someone brave enough to stick up for the right wing in our country.
Why, in this country there are people who get on TV and in newspapers who only agree 90% with the lunatic right wing.
If we were truly good Americans and interested in good, patriotic debate, we would make sure that 100% of all commentators and 100% of every word which came out of their mouths would be 100% far right wing.
Only then, with 100% right wing spin all the time would we have true intellectual debate.
Because otherwise someone might disagree with the ultra right wing, and then that really hurts them, and some of them cry, and it really embarasses them when they cry.
You don’t want to make the lunatic right wingers cry, do you?
June 6th, 2006 at 11:10 amSo, first they were using their grief to make a political point, but at the same time, they were enjoying their husband’s death so much. She was not allowed to respond? WTF?!? You can’t shut her up! She was simply frustrated because she knew how scummy she would look to everyone, if she were to rip their throats out, like she wanted to. But that was self-preservation, not respect for these women. I am sorry to be so crude here, but she is SUCH A GASH!!!
June 6th, 2006 at 11:11 amJeez, you would think Mann Coulter could afford to have her Adam’s Apple shaved.
It’s elective cosmetic surgery and she would have to pay for it herself, but she can afford it.
It is still plainly visible in the photo above.
Mann Coulter is the perfect spokesho hypocrite for the religious right’s moral values…she’s a transsexual and she sleeps around.
If you want to talk about a godless person, thats Mann Coulter.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:11 amAnn Coulter is either a very devious, liberal performance artist or mentally ill.
There is no middle ground.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:15 amIt was such a beautiful morning until I logged on here and saw that screen grab. You had to go and spoil it, didn’t you? Now I have to mop up all this puke.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:16 amI see her hysterical-white-female-pundit membership is still active. She must be paying in advance. Matt didnt have to say anything really, she would’ve went on with her rant regardless. Classless, tasteless, and heartless.
Sincerely,
A WTC “Broad”
June 6th, 2006 at 11:16 amIf anyone on here has ever seen a drag queen show before, then you would realize that Ann Coulter really is a guy who takes male hormone shots and had breast implant surgery! Drag queens are very confused about their sexuality because they believe they are females trapped inside a male body! Everyone I have ever seen on stage had nasty mouths who spewed hatred just like Ann Coulter! One I saw in Jacksonville, Florida, looked 100% female > some even have their penis removed! Ann Coulter is NOT a real female!
June 6th, 2006 at 11:17 amtakes female hormone shots I mean lol
June 6th, 2006 at 11:20 amShe’s an f’ing lunitic. Would someone just please put her on a barren island somewhere and leave her there?
June 6th, 2006 at 11:25 amBut, please, see her face. She is the saddest person in the world. I just feel pity for her.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:26 amNo, no,no,no,no, It can’t be! Naw, it’s impossible…but for a minute there I thought she/it was Skeletor’s wife! She must be one of those alien cross-breeds on crack cocaine!Ha!
June 6th, 2006 at 11:26 amCoulter reminds me of the shit demon on the movie Dogma.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:28 am#62 – …Kathy Griffin later..â€What’s with having that nutbag Ann Coulter on…Why was she wearing a cocktail dress for a morning show…I think she just makes stuff up…â€
Comment by Oleary25 — June 6, 2006 @ 10:53 am
because she hadn’t been home from the night before yet…?
i too, hope someone gets a video of griffin’s remarks – that was rich…
June 6th, 2006 at 11:29 am#91 – Juan C, she lures you in with your pity, then she rips off your head and spits down your neck.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:29 amAnn’s begging for a lawsuit with books like that. The only language a neocon understands is money, so suing her would be the only way to get through. Those 9/11 widows need a good lawyer, they are being defamed.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:30 amMakes you wonder why, all of a sudden, she is bringing them up – maybe a little sunshine is about to fall on the whitewash?
We all complain a lot to each other – does anyone know if there is an Ann Coulter Hate Club site, where we could all reigister our disgust and have it sent to the shows that give her air time?
wake up, republicans! This is your God, whose vomitus you praise and buy like sheep!
June 6th, 2006 at 11:31 amhappy now?
Mission accomplished, right?
Freedom©, right?
# 88- Jay, I think you are confusing Transgender with Transvestite. There is a huge difference between the two.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:32 amIt is really sickening that Ann Coulter mentions those who lost their dears in 9/11, considering how she serves people who cynically exploited the grief of 9/11 to gain support and carry out their plans of power, profit, death and destruction (while fat multinationals and cronies made money on war), deceiving and lying to people.
They used 9/11 as a huge photo-op to justify PNAC long-planned wars and deliriums of power. It’s even disgusting they mention 9/11. They don’t have any moral right.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:32 amShe is so beyond done, it’s not even funny. She’s is an evil, I would use human being, but that doesn’t even apply here. She’s done. Her, O’Reilly, Hannity, Limbaugh, etc., are now the most hated in the country, only second to George Bush, and the entire Republican Party. They’ve lost their minds, and now, they are going to such extreme lengths to get attention. Seriously, after seeing this, if anyone buys this book, they deserve the backlash they get. This is pathetic. I also saw a promo for Tucker Carlson having Coulter on. He’s another wimp who’s on his last leg. Jon Stewart ripped him off the air, and put the little bow tie freak in his place. The Right is going to be paying for this time in our history for decades to come, and it’s all on tape and all over the internet. Coulter needs a straight jacket.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:33 amHERE IS THE ABSOLUTE TRUTH TO ANN’A IDENTITY! I URGE YOU ALL TO PASS THIS LINK AROUND TO ALL YOUR FRIENDS!
http://www.hoolinet.com/StrapOnVets/tabid/278/Default.aspx
June 6th, 2006 at 11:33 amJust the title of the section this post is filed under says it all: Terroism, Media.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:34 amHERE IS THE ABSOLUTE TRUTH TO ANN’A IDENTITY! I URGE YOU ALL TO PASS THIS LINK AROUND TO ALL YOUR FRIENDS!
http://www.hoolinet.com/StrapOnVets/tabid/278/Default.aspx
June 6th, 2006 at 11:34 amThe ones who are really to blame for Coulter’s remarks are the networks that give her a free ride. They’re the ones responsible for the destruction she causes.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:35 am#95. Probably, just like all right-wingers, who just hate and live with fear of hoards of communists taking their plasma TVs and HUmmers to spread the wealth. I feel just pity for them. (Well, aside from this buddhist attitude, sometimes I really want to smack them)
June 6th, 2006 at 11:36 amMatt Lauer is a pretty boy. He just caved in the last exchange, after she called him testy. “Anne Coulter. always fun to have you here.”????
June 6th, 2006 at 11:36 amPost 98 most drag queens are males who dress up as females > they do not have both sexual parts at birth! I am not referring to those who are born male and female! Ann Coulter was once 100% male, but now he/her is a created female!
June 6th, 2006 at 11:37 amShe (He) is not worth the effort, but what is this doctrine of infallibility? Did it not take six years for the Prez to admit just one mistake and the best he could come up with is he talked too tough to the terrorist!
June 6th, 2006 at 11:37 amThe ones who are really to blame are the propagandist networks that give her a free ride. They’re ultimately responsible for any destruction she causes.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:37 amMaybe Matt should host MTP. Actually, GE will probably can him tomorrow.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:40 am“Stop, stop, stop, stop hurting America” – Jon Stewart
June 6th, 2006 at 11:42 amOkay, so is Mann Coulter a transvestite or a transsexual?
Either way, she is one sick puppy.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:43 amWhat gives the widows the right to grieve, anyway? Capitalizing on 9/11, shame on them! 9/11 belongs to Bush — he should sue them for copyright violation.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:43 ammr. ed – that was funny, but the green wig photo is definitely photshop – the shading on “her” face is all wrong, even at first glance…
June 6th, 2006 at 11:44 amJay Randal
Nobody knows what sex Ann Coulter was born with. She is an Anti-intellegence, she renders anyone who gets too close to her so stupid that they can’t tell the difference. The doctors, who refused to look at her twice because shit naked pundits are the stuff of nightmares, had to decide her sex over a coin toss later on once they had recovered somewhat.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:44 amthat is a man’s jawline, the ususal giveaway, along with big feet and an adam’s apple.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:44 amThanks post 101 for the facts on the real Ann Coulter > Mr. Jeremy Levinsohn aka as Pudenda Shenanigans the drag queen of Key West, Florida.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:46 amJudd – Did you gain your expertise in headline writing at the National Enquirer? Shame on you – or whoever authorized your misleading “headline”. The way you have strung your words, you imply that Ann is referring to ALL the 9/11 widows with her stinging criticism.
I realize why so many of the posters here parrot their irrational hatred of someone they disagree with repeatedly – they could not COMPREHEND the basis of Coulter’s criticism (the Democrat “Not-in-our-Name” widows who endorsed an anemic foreign response to 9/11). But another explanation might be dyslexia…or laziness, if your average posters chose not to read the transcript….
June 6th, 2006 at 11:47 amTransvestite = man who likes to dress in womens clothes.
Transsexual = woman trapped in a mans body.
I think Mann Coulter is a transvestite. She hasn’t bothered to have her Adam’s Apple removed and shes a freaky sex addict. I bet she still has a penis.
Wonder if any of her ex-boy toys, like Bill Maher, will ever speak up on whether they know what Mann Coulter really is. I bet she only gave them blowjobs and they don’t know what she’s packing in her panties.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:49 amWhy give this piece of human excrement the time of day? Ignore the piece of trash and hopefully it will shrivel up and die from lack of attention that it so desperately seeks!
June 6th, 2006 at 11:49 amWhy give these loony toons so much media attention? If I run around with no pants on saying that all umm.. lets say…. fat…asian… scientists worship satan and eat baby flesh, can I be on TV too?
June 6th, 2006 at 11:49 amPost 114 > some drag queens really dress like that with even a green wig that looks fake in a pic > go to Key West and see a real drag queen show or in Miami!
June 6th, 2006 at 11:50 am#118 – Mighty Teabagger agrees with Anne Coulter that the uppity widows need a spokesmodel.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:52 amWho is she ?? A drag queen ??
June 6th, 2006 at 11:54 amMighty Moron is a drag queen herself so no wonder she is upset by this TP thread > lol.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:54 amJay
MAnn Coulter. Think about it.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:55 amCorrection: MA is a drag queen HIMSELF so no wonder HE is upset by this TP thread > lol.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:56 amThis is why I stopped watching the Today Show years ago. Why anyone thinks Ann Coulter deserves this kind of platform is beyond me. I wish the Today Show would just ignore her, like they ignore whackjobs like Fred Phelps. Of course they don’t, because they want to stoke the fires of controversy, get people all riled up. And the thing is, people like Ann Coulter and Michelle Malkin and whatnot have built their entire careers on that one thing: getting people riled up. That’s really all they are good at doing. I for one am sick of everyone trying to push my buttons all the time. I’m opting out of the agita.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:56 amMaybe Maher slapped his johnson on her forehead a few times than wiped his outboard on the drapes. It really brings out the anger.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:58 am[...] UPDATE: Video here (QT) HT Think Progress [...]
June 6th, 2006 at 11:58 amANd I never knew someone could love the misery and pain and suffering of others so much until I heard about Ann COulter. I had no idea someone could be so full of hatred until i heard abotu Ann COulter. I had no idea someone love getting rich by bashing, smearing, insulting, lying, and offending anyone with ANY sense of common decency…until I heard abotu Ann Coulter.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:59 ammighty teabagger lol
yeah i bet hes a teabagger and knows what republican scrotums taste like.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:59 amCoulter needs to brush up on his/her Jesus.Does her/his proclivity for the short skirts say anything about his/her perception of how well she/he is pulling off the sexual deception?
June 6th, 2006 at 11:59 amYes post 126 Coulter was once male anyways > lol. I do not understand why the press is too scared to investigate his background and admit Ann is/was male? If a Democrat was a drag queen the press would be all over it like flies to tackpaper!
June 6th, 2006 at 11:59 amShorter Coulter: People are welcome to respond and have political opinions, so long as they’re in support of Dear Cheerleader.
I guess it’s hard to talk even her moron fan-base into dropping 25 bucks on that, so she has to lard it with the usual straw-man arguments and projected inferiority complexes. That she’s apparently some sort of house intellectual on the MSM just adds to the abuse.
And hey, since we’re all about having Christian-approved personal lives now, how’s Miss Thang’s? No man, so she’s celibate, right? Right, dearie? Oh, I sincerely hope so. Every time Ann Coulter pleasures herself, “Pat” Robertson cries, and then bench-presses 1,250 pounds.
June 6th, 2006 at 11:59 amSo Kathy Griffith called her out? Excellent but it would’ve been even more pleasurable if Janene Garafalo had been sitting beside the Annstein or came immediately afterwards. Or any celebrity gay fashion designer The Suburban Crack Skank Look is soooo 1990’s
June 6th, 2006 at 12:03 pmWhat should we expect? Coulter and the right like to co-opt 9/11 like it only happened to them. She somehow thinks that she was a victim of 9/11, unlike the real people who lost their lives. Even more amazing, it happened under a Republican president’s watch. Yet somehow, it’s the Democrats’ fault.
I have a career change suggestion for Ms. Coulter: suicide bomber in Iraq. She can start immediately.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:03 pmThe fact that she is being dignified by all these comments, is repugnant. To be crass, she is an un-appealing piece of shit, both physically and intellectually. She thrives on these reactions, she lives on being provocative, she is addicted to sensationalism. That despicable WO-MAN is laughing all the way to the bank. Why are we helping her? Ignore her! There are much more important events and people we should be paying attention to.
“The best part of her ran down her mother’s leg………”
June 6th, 2006 at 12:04 pmI don’t think it was their death the widows ejoyed.It was the attention.
My wife and I are lefties for sure, but we made similar remarks about the widows ourselves. They seemed to enjoy the attention they recieved to the point that it overided their grief. Their faces were lit up as the energy flowed to them in a way I have never seen in someone who had such a loss. There is no doubt that the modern American upper middle-class spoiled soccermom LOVES attention but I never thought,, THAT much.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:04 pmcalm down
June 6th, 2006 at 12:04 pmThe 6th graders who play in this sand box and smelly locker room couldn’t muster an intelligent argument….I, on the other hand have an argument with REAL INFO to present (pssst….and I don’t EVEN refer to the DA as a transvestite lesbian bondage queen….)
Tooodles….
June 6th, 2006 at 12:06 pmPost 138 > yes Ann or actually Jeremy likes attention > craves it in fact > drag queens love to shock people!
June 6th, 2006 at 12:07 pmLay it on us Mighty.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:08 pmmighty aphrodite
Which is to say that you are confirming my suspicions as to just who you actually are.
See ya, MAnn.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:09 pmSee post 141 MA proves by his own words he is a drag queen > no real females talk that way!
June 6th, 2006 at 12:09 pmMighty Teabagger is definitely a closet case
Keep sucking on those GOP testicles, Mighty
June 6th, 2006 at 12:13 pmMighty Aphrodite is even a name a queen might use for their stage act > MA gave himself away a few weeks ago when he mentioned hanging out with Gay hair stylists and getting info from them! He/she is a lawyer my ass > lol.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:14 pm# 141 6Th graders…sand box…smelly locker room…
June 6th, 2006 at 12:17 pmNo, still no harm here.
#118 Shame on you – or whoever authorized your misleading “headlineâ€. The way you have strung your words, you imply that Ann is referring to ALL the 9/11 widows with her stinging criticism.
That’s the best you can do? Defending Ann because she was only referring to the widows who were critical of Bush as “enjoying their husband’s death so much?â€
Yeah, shame on you, Judd. How dare you accuse Ann Coulter of being a callous bitch, indifferent to the death and suffering of others? Be fair. She’s only indifferent to the death and suffering of people who don’t agree with her. Come on now.
Geez, MA. You’ve got to be getting paid for these posts.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:18 pmUntil AC, I’ve never thought that it was acceptable for a man to b*tch-slap a woman…
I have to disagree with the consensus. True she has a large Adams apple but she doesn’t have manly shoulders.
I’m so confused!
June 6th, 2006 at 12:19 pmIsn’t she the person who wrote that article right after 9-11 about how she was personally affronted because her ‘friend’, Babs Olsen, had been in one of the planes that went down?
See, mourning the loss of another bleached-blonde rightwing harpy = good
Expressing outrage about the loss of your life partner = bad.
Republicans; doing to math what they’ve been doing to science.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:19 pm#132 – I stole “Mighty Teabagger” from another commenter here: ForTruth. Should have given credit where credit is due. :D
June 6th, 2006 at 12:20 pmAnn’s turning into the spawn of Fred Phelps. I used to think the best strategy was to ignore her but her positions are so far over the line, the more exposure she gets, the better. Blasting the widows of 9/11 – that’s a great PR strategy. Another year or two, she’ll be on the arm of Fred Phelps protesting that soldier’s deaths are a liberal plot to undermine support for the war.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:22 pm#139 – There is no doubt that the modern American upper middle-class spoiled soccermom LOVES attention but I never thought,, THAT much.
Comment by the other John
I’m sure they’d rather have their husbands than the attention.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:23 pmSome say we should not be discussing Coulter. I would agree except for the fact that so many out there listen to her, and read her and take what she says as gospel fact. When crazy people get recognized soemone has to speak out and point out that they are crazy and refute the hateful rhetoric. Otherwise we ignore her and her uneducated fans will continue to be what they are.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:23 pmHow come Ms. Coulter won’t ever talk about her own sense of infallibility and godlessness?
Let’s guess that she’s a professed christian of some sort. So whatever happen to “love one another as I love you!”
The problem with the right wing’s notion of american christianity is that is neither.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:27 pm#74
Too bad they don’t even come close to following this doctrine.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:28 pmWhy do major media outlets give time to hateful people like this. It only legitmizes and glamorizes this kind of irrational, mean-spirited thinking – and puts money in the hands of people who use the misery of others to make themselves falsely controversial.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:28 pmThree cheers for Coulter! Ya gotta love her when she exposes the arrogant, secular supremacists
June 6th, 2006 at 12:30 pmwhy is being Godless perceived as a negative term? I perceive it as an intellectual and factual one.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:30 pmBritish Gary
Ditto.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:31 pmWhenever Coulter is discussed the hate on this board comes out in spades. You progessives want to attack her as if she is a tranny and then you condemn repubs for even bringing gender up. I guess then the repubs are justified in questioning Hillary’s preferences.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:33 pm#148 – Jay, I’m starting to get my feelings hurt here! All the women in my family are very tall and skinny, although much better looking that Anne Coulter, and while people always thought my sisters and I were boys when we were growing up (pre-boobage), none of us has ever been a man!
June 6th, 2006 at 12:34 pm“True she has a large Adams apple but she doesn’t have manly shoulders”
Mann Coulter is “genetically gifted” in trans slang. She grew up a skinny boy and so it was easy to start wearing dresses and passing as a girl…except the adams apple.
Not all drag queens are built like fullbacks. Some of them could have lunch with you and you would never, ever know unless they told you.
And as for transsexuals…even many gynecologists can’t tell, the surgery is that good.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:35 pmHere is a link to the clip of Kathy Griffin making fun of Coulter.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:36 pmThat did it. You guys just lost the white supremecist vote.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:37 pmMean spirited? Compared to yor comment she is quite composed.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:37 pmukases, you’re a dumbass chimpylover.
the barney frank rule says it is okay to bash closet cases like mann coulter…because they support a gay-bashing agenda.
otoh, the gop has no business bashing hillary’s sexual preference because she’s not a gay-bashing hypocracy.
its all about the hypocracy, you moron. you are too stupid to get that.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:37 pmIn thinking of the worst thing to say about Ann Coulter (”She’s a transexual”), you malign people who really haven’t harmed anybody. Are bigoted comments in the name of Coulter any different than what she spews? To me, such extreme comments are unnecessary, as criticizing Coulter is shooting-fish-in-a-barrel easy. To wit:
Even dead people vote in the right district.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:37 pmI am not a big fan of Ms. Coulter, but she is 100% right about the 9/11 widows. They are on television all the time, who the hell wants their opinion about anything. It seems they are always on blasting Bush, the memorial, freedom tower, the war on terror, airline security, Iraq, etc. Go away. I feel your pain, but you are nothing special. Quit bitching. Great interview Anne. I will buy the book just for that one quote.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:39 pmS
sorry british gary, you are correct.
it is perfectly okay to not believe in god.
and it is still protected by the constitution…at least until bush gets done destroying it.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:39 pmShe would look good in a Nazi uniform and whip presiding over one of the many domestic internment camps her fellow conservatives are pushing for.
“Anthrax Coulter, She-Wolf of the SS”? Box office gold!
June 6th, 2006 at 12:39 pmPost 168 Zookeeper > just imagine Ann Coulter as a tall lanky guy named Jeremy > lol. Bush calls her “Grasshopper” another Gay lingo word like “Turdblossom” for Karl Rove!
June 6th, 2006 at 12:40 pm#167 Yes by all means keep talking about the Clintons’ sex lives. Nothing wins over moderates like choosing salacious rumors over real policy discussions. Coulter will never run for office (she can’t even follow simple voting laws) so it doesn’t matter what we say about her.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:41 pmGeez Tom3, calm down you are starting to freek out. Take an enima and calm down.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:41 pmI watch the Today Show every day but when I saw that Ann was going to be on I immediately flipped to Good Morning America. Seriously…I just can’t watch her.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:42 pmSteven is a dumbass chimpylover.
Mann Coulter is the one doing the bitching.
The 911 widows are doing a great job.
Steven wants them to shut up, thats typical nazi talk.
People like Steven hate our Constitution.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:42 pmDeport Ann. Pass it on.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:43 pmukases
First off, I don’t like Hillary.
Second; Hillary hasn’t exactly called for my death. Ann has. As a died in the wool liberal my demise would have been included in her estimation of what constitutes hilarity.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:44 pmWhat a hateful man “she” is, talking about all the hateful liberals…
June 6th, 2006 at 12:44 pmukases,
its spelled enema, you dumbass chimpylover.
go suck on some testicles, you closet case.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:44 pmI BELIEVE THAT ANN HAS THIS AFFLICTION!
What is androgen insensitivity syndrome?
Androgen insensitivity syndrome is a condition that affects sexual development before birth and during puberty. People with this condition are genetically male, with one X and one Y chromosome. Because their bodies are unable to respond to certain hormones (called androgens), they may have mostly female sexual characteristics or signs of both male and female sexual development (hermaphroditism).
Complete androgen insensitivity syndrome occurs when the body cannot use androgens at all. Partial or mild androgen insensitivity syndrome results when tissues are partially sensitive to the effects of androgens. People with partial androgen insensitivity (also called Reifenstein syndrome) can have normal female sexual characteristics, both male and female sexual characteristics, or normal male sexual characteristics. People with mild androgen insensitivity appear male, but are often infertile and tend to develop female breasts at puberty.
http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/ condition…itivitysyndrome
June 6th, 2006 at 12:44 pmukases? Why are you on here defending Ann/Jeremy the drag queen from Hell? Go get a life or tell Karl Rove to assign you another blog site to post on?!
June 6th, 2006 at 12:44 pmCut Ann some slack – she was drunk.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:45 pmSorry, died should be dyed.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:46 pm167 – Think the issue here is one of hypocrisy, you know blowharding one way and living the opposite?
June 6th, 2006 at 12:46 pmshe is sick in the mind and body , just listen and look . she looks ill , something is very wrong .
June 6th, 2006 at 12:47 pmi think mann coulter is just plain insensitive.
her disgusting comments about widows is proof of that.
she’s a typical neocon sociopath.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:47 pmThanks Zookeeper,
For the credit. Nothing else to discuss here, although I love animals too.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:49 pmTom3 is full of rage. Every comment has made starts or finishes with vitriol. This hate speach from the “progressives” is exactly what will keep the govt in repub hands. Hate won’t sell and the left is so full of it that they no longer can control it. Look at the comments here. So much hate directed against a man who can’t run again. That was Coulters message this morning. Bush has no need for popularity, he ain’t running any more. Keep up the hate speach and we will win again.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:49 pmHer new book is called “Godless.” Well, why didn’t Lauer just ask her questions like:
What church do you belong to and how often do you go?
or:
Do you believe in sex outside of marriage?
or:
If you are so intuned to the God fearing right wing in this country, how can you possibly be seen in public in those black mini-skirts?
June 6th, 2006 at 12:49 pmAnn does look sick, there is something wrong with her. She acted drugged or hung over
June 6th, 2006 at 12:49 pm[...] Think Progress put up a partial transcript of the interview: LAUER: Do you believe everything in the book or do you put some things in there just to cater to your base? [...]
June 6th, 2006 at 12:52 pmit is perfectly okay to not believe in god.
Comment by Tom3 — June 6, 2006 @ 12:39 pm
It just goes to show the common misperception of the term Godless. The extremists have managed to subvert words such as ‘liberal’ and ‘Godless’ into negative terms.
Neither are negative terms – they are both progressive.
Godless is a particularly educated term.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:53 pmThe only problem I have SOME of the widows of 9/11 is that they were complaining about the about of money they were receiving wasn’t enough. The compensation the that 9/11 famlies are receiving is a pure gift and should be accepted without prejudice considering people die everyday in accidents caused by negligence or maliciousness and their famlies are never compensated at all. Police, fireman, soldiers, ect…are killed in the line of duty and are their family compensation pales in comparison.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:54 pmYo, Matt! Which part of that was “fun” exactly?
June 6th, 2006 at 12:54 pmLets all hope her book tanks…The book made its debut today and already the reviews are not in her favor…
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1400054206/qid=1149612846/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/002-3015175-0934452?s=books&v=glance&n=283155
June 6th, 2006 at 12:54 pmfeel free to add your own two-sense!
Tom 3 Hates America. So does the 9/11 widows. You have to admit Anne is right on here. Most of these families took in millions and just keep complaining. Blame everything on Bush. Just not right.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:55 pmSteven
Whatever Ann Coulter says not to do — DO IT.
The screeching right actually offers us progressives a pretty good road map. Whatever they attack is generally what works for us (as opposed to capitulation). When Dems adopt this rule of strategy, things will shift quickly and sustainably.
Example: Coulter knows damn well that the 911 widows are a potent and influential group, and her remarks are an attempt to change that.
We should take their unwitting advice and turn the volume to 10 (11? depends on the amp) when they demand we turn the sound off. After awhile they will get wise and stop with the hatemongering and we can get back to a relatively rational national discussion.
Ann Coulter is Brer Fox. Brer Fox !! You heard it here first! (
June 6th, 2006 at 12:57 pmukases > you are a pathetic PAID Bush loving troll, so who cares what you think or spew on here! As for Ann/Jeremy > he is a vile bigoted drag queen who spews hatred on widows and orphans of 9/11 > Ann deserves total contempt from everybody on here!
June 6th, 2006 at 12:59 pm#200
Nothing that a good “facial” won’t take care of.
June 6th, 2006 at 12:59 pmI’m not a violent person by nature, but if Ann Coulter was standing in front of me, the desire to beat her ass into a bloody pulp would be too much for me to control. Jail time would follow.
June 6th, 2006 at 1:01 pmSomething to consider about Ann Coulter and her “fans”…
I’ve read most of these comments so I don’t think I can add anything new about what she said here, what I think I can contribute is something happened last weekend that was a bit inspiring and positive relating to Ann Coulter…
My brother is a millionaire republican in Atlanta, GA. He read Ann Coulter’s comments from her webpage about me where she called me a “little girl” – he thought it was funny until I told him that:
(1) I wrote Ann Coulter and her sponsors asking for answers as a follow up to her statements about Murtha who “longs to see troops shot” along with a vengeful attack that she made to someone I know and like – Lydia Cornell.
(2) The vengeful attack against Lydia was posting Lydia’s private home address and phone number along with email on Ann’s website. Lydia received hundreds of death threats via phone and email – she is married, has two young boys (I don’t think Ann is married or has children but I’m sure she can find some way to relate). Informed of all of this by Lydia and several others, Ann still refused to respond or remove the information and the death threats continued.
My brother wasn’t laughing or smiling at that point. I didn’t have to convince him of the truth or facts.
My point here is simple – most people, even ones like my brother who buy into this crap, when confronted with the truth about what she professes to believe, back off from her.
June 6th, 2006 at 1:08 pm#197 – Nothing else to discuss here, although I love animals too.
Comment by For Truth
Too funny. You are right, let’s move on, Anne loves the attention.
June 6th, 2006 at 1:46 pmFor the record, my “zoo” consists of poorly behaved attorneys. ;)
I’d write something but I just read some excerpts from her new book, and I can’t stop laughing right now.
June 6th, 2006 at 1:57 pmHAHAHAHAHAH 110 lb Blonde whips the Liberal (Progressive for those to chicken to say what they are) girlie men into a hissy-fit
GO ANN!!!!
June 6th, 2006 at 2:02 pm[...] Only one sighting of the devil today so far, she/it was barking unintelligible gibberish to Matt Lauer. Fortunately, the devil is not too bright. [...]
June 6th, 2006 at 2:03 pmThe jail time would follow AFTER you recover from the ass whippin …..Liberals men are sissys that do not know how to fight :)
June 6th, 2006 at 2:04 pmGodless is a particularly educated term.
Comment by British Gary — June 6, 2006 @ 12:53 pm
Agreed! :)
June 6th, 2006 at 2:04 pm#214 Hooray! Ann insults victims of 9/11. Take that, dirty hippies!
June 6th, 2006 at 2:05 pmHAHAHAHAHAH 110 lb Blonde whips the Liberal (Progressive for those to chicken to say what they are) girlie men into a hissy-fit
GO ANN!!!!
Comment by Jim Todd — June 6, 2006 @ 2:02 pm
LOL, are you kidding me you two bit inbred LOL.
We are still laughing.
If Ann Coulter speaks for the conservative movement, then shes the best advocate for our side that could ever exist.
She makes you guys look like hillbilly Nazi’s. LMFAO
June 6th, 2006 at 2:06 pmKind of like the KeyStone Cops with arm bands.
June 6th, 2006 at 2:07 pmLiberals men are sissys that do not know how to fight :)
Comment by Jim Todd — June 6, 2006 @ 2:04 pm
Boy, you’re a stud… Whatcha got – three four good teeth left?
Liberal men know how to spell. It’s why they are your bosses, Einstein.
June 6th, 2006 at 2:08 pmThat bitch has paid for her one-way ticket to hell a million times over. I truly hope she enjoys the trip. After all, she can look forward to seeing ALL of her best buddies there.
June 6th, 2006 at 2:08 pmWhat I don’t get is why Matt Lauer didn’t go for the jugular and just say what he really meant, which he probably thought it was in bad taste and ‘hateful’, like the rest of America thought at the time..?
Now if I were a betting fool on the why Ann Coulter is on Today, I would research the publisher ties and the money that probably changed hands at NBC to have her on, if her book is truly tanking. Matt Lauer had her flipping around like a flounder in a frying pan, and to thank her at the end of all that, well…somebody made some money, but that someone had a great sense of humor punishing her scrawny ass live, and for that I am thankful.
June 6th, 2006 at 2:10 pmIf this country was full of modern day republicans in 1776 we would all still be celebrating the queens mums birthday… Give me liberty or give me death!… something the right just cannot fathom. Go ahead Ann supporters .. tell us allll about those wussies George Washington and Ben Franklin… come on… you know more about Americas birth than anyone … tell us all about how antiLiberal the founding fathers were… provide links to .. I want to see this.
June 6th, 2006 at 2:16 pm“Godless: The Church of Liberalism.â€
Uh, that can’t be Ann Coulter’s new book. After all, she’s the one who said that the teachings of Christ don’t mean anything.
Whatever.
June 6th, 2006 at 2:30 pm.
Ann Coulter is becoming the most hated female in the United States > whoops I mean the most hated MALE in the US > she just wears dresses and make up like Mighty Aphrodite on here > lol.
June 6th, 2006 at 2:33 pmLook at the pic of Ann on this thread carefully > imagine her hair cut short and no make-up > she would look like a goofy tall Gay Danish guy > lol. ( Note: that is who she really is a guy in drag.)
June 6th, 2006 at 2:36 pmGerald
It was, but you see, conservatives are kind of shit at winning wars.
June 6th, 2006 at 2:37 pmEvolution of a Democracy:
Start off by being “liberated” either with help, or the people liberating themselves.
Sell the liberation, by allowing “freedoms”, get all onboard.
Things go well for a couple hundred years, Freedom rings.
Then, it’s time to clamp down, as the “freedom” is no longer useful, people get complacent of freedom, and let someone take it.
Then, the people are reminded of what they had, and miss it.
The whole thing starts over.
June 6th, 2006 at 2:38 pmShe is going to talk herself into an early grave with her ugly mouth. Sooner than she thinks. Hateful trannie loser.
June 6th, 2006 at 2:38 pm#224 – An excellent example of a mind terribly wasted. Gerald, so consistently WRONG, at least he’s consistent.
The folks who founded our nation on liberty, responsibility, freedom of speech, freedom to practice religion if one chose, and the remaining enumerated rights did NOT found our wonderful country on coercive progressive income taxes or a welfare state from “cradle to grave”. The folks who couldn’t stomach the fight of the Revolutionary War hit the road to Canada or got back to England PDQ.
Post-modern lprogressives co-opted the title liberal from the enlightened term “classical liberal”. FYI, Gerald, “Classical Liberal” does not describe YOU….
Recess is over….
June 6th, 2006 at 2:39 pmI am so glad Mighty feels the need to watch over us kids, must be those co-dependency, and control issues.
June 6th, 2006 at 2:42 pmI like Bill Maher as a comedian, but he dated and had sex with Ann Coulter the crossdresser, so will Maher admit he swings both ways sexually, or does he just like drag queens hoping everyone thinks he sleeps with females?
June 6th, 2006 at 2:44 pmYou guys Mean MAnne Coltrane right?
The Guy from Georgia?
I notice that MAnne never denies, nor confronts this allegation..
Because, LOL, Its TRUE!!
June 6th, 2006 at 2:47 pmPost 234 > the press refuses to look into Ann’s background, even though her identification documents are forged > she even signed her voting card in Florida checking the box for MALE > whoops she forgot to check female box since she is actually a guy playacting as female!
June 6th, 2006 at 2:52 pmLets take this one from the top:
I wouldn’t call throwing people in jail for no charge just because they belong to a different religion or race liberating. Gitmo ain’t an engine of liberation.
Now here is where your later statements take a beating, because first off, those taxes and bits of welfare you so bemoan can be seen as a form of responsibility, and second because responsibility is the last thing your guys have demonstrated. Note GW’s treatment of the enviroment, general disregard for the law, and lets not forget, his staff outing a US undercover operative.
Which shouldn’t result in us being accused of being terrorists or having people like Ann Coulter calling for our deaths, for us engaging in it. A right only extends as far as it does not infringe on somebody else’s rights.
Which is NOT “So long as that religion happens to be Christian or Jewish” like a certain sector of the right would like everyone to believe.
Such as privacy, the right to protest, the right to bare arms, the right to access to information (limited of course by the rules surrounding classification) and the right to a free press. All of these have been deliberately undermined by GW during the last six years.
Now onto the rest of it:
Yes, they probably had no idea how successful their grand experiment could be, and couldn’t imagine how wealthy Americans would become over the years, so they probably hadn’t even dreamed that an America without hunger was possible.
The folks who couldn’t stomach the revolutionary war ended fighting in it, either as loyalists or as rebels. Some even acted as field doctors and journalists, recording the events of the said war. People of all sorts of persuasions fought in the revolutionary war, it wasn’t a matter of brave American hawks, and cowardly loyalist doves.
It comes from the term Liberty, as in freedom. We do not believe in sacrificing freedom in the name of security.
June 6th, 2006 at 2:55 pmThe folks who founded our nation on liberty, responsibility, freedom of speech, freedom to practice religion if one chose, and the remaining enumerated rights did NOT found our wonderful country on coercive progressive income taxes or a welfare state from “cradle to graveâ€. The folks who couldn’t stomach the fight of the Revolutionary War hit the road to Canada or got back to England PDQ.
Post-modern lprogressives co-opted the title liberal from the enlightened term “classical liberalâ€. FYI, Gerald, “Classical Liberal†does not describe YOU….
Recess is over….
You can’t teach people anything, because you DONT know what the hell your talking about. You rant one way, then another, then its the Liberal rant, then the Homosexual rant, then the hispanic rant, then the war on Christmas rant, the war on easter rant, the war on liberals rant…
You just rant and rant and rant. No one here, cares, or believes a damn thing you say, and thats no ones fault but your own.
You are but a JOKE. A not so funny Joke.
June 6th, 2006 at 2:56 pmWas J. Fred Muggs unavailable?
Personal to A.C.: It’s called Prell, honey.
June 6th, 2006 at 2:56 pmI’m just curious,
June 6th, 2006 at 2:56 pmHow substantial are these allegations re: “it’s” sexual assignment?
Is there a gaping hole where “Anne’s” background should be?
And couldn’t we all pool our money to hire someone to investigate?
I think it would be money well spent! :)
How substantial are these allegations re: “it’s†sexual assignment?
Is there a gaping hole where “Anne’s†background should be?
Who cares? Its called Fair and Balanced reporting!!
June 6th, 2006 at 2:59 pmFlush Dimbulb,
June 6th, 2006 at 3:01 pmI see nothing fair nor balanced when I see Anne Coulter…….
Boy, you’re a stud… Whatcha got – three four good teeth left?
Liberal men know how to spell. It’s why they are your bosses, Einstein.
Comment by unbelievable — June 6, 2006 @ 2:08 pm
LMFAO
June 6th, 2006 at 3:05 pmCoulter looks like a Pipe Cleaner with a mouth.
June 6th, 2006 at 3:08 pmWhat about enjoying the ‘Death of His Wife So Much’?
Hint: search for Olson here
June 6th, 2006 at 3:10 pmhttp://911-for-dummies.blogspot.com/
[...] Comment by M — June 6, 2006 @ 2:38 pm [...]
June 6th, 2006 at 3:11 pmYou know why she wears her hair in her face like that don’t you?
Because she doesn’t want people to find out she’s really Skeletor.
June 6th, 2006 at 3:16 pmFrom Coulters Bio on Wikepedia
Ann Coulter was born in Darien, Connecticut and later raised in New Canaan, Connecticut, in a family she describes as “upper middle class”. Coulter’s two older brothers are John and James. Her father, John V. Coulter, a lawyer, represented clients in opposition to labor unions before obtaining a government job as a constable. Her mother, Nell M. Coulter, is a member of the New Canaan Republican Town Committee
Gee, daddy fought with big business against us steerage being able to unionize. He sounds like a real “people person”.
And mommy is a member of the New Canaan Republican “Town” Committee,
Wonder what a “commitee” like that does in between book burnings and placing Liberal stickers on democrat owned store front windows?
June 6th, 2006 at 3:25 pmI think “upper” middle class in New Canaan means you’ve got a porch on your double-wide.
June 6th, 2006 at 3:27 pmWe’d all love to make Ann a merry little widow, but first she would have to FORCE one of the 3,000,000,000 men on Earth to marry her.
So far, no takers. On Earth.
June 6th, 2006 at 3:30 pmIf Ann Coulter speaks for the conservative movement, then shes the best advocate for our side that could ever exist.
She makes you guys look like hillbilly Nazi’s. LMFAO
Comment by FLAVIUS WORFEUS — June 6, 2006 @ 2:06 pm
“Look like”?
The BitchBully Annie backers are so stupid they couldn’t find their asses with maps, flashlights, compasses, detailed directions and a head start
June 6th, 2006 at 3:33 pmBeing a widower myself (not as a result of 9/11), I cannot express how disgusted this makes me. I never did like Coulter, but she has sunk to a new low. I feel those widow(er)s’ pain and no amount of money will EVER make up for losing a spouse. You are never the same after losing your spouse, ESPECIALLY at a young age. Coulter is at the top of my list now for the most repulsive and uncaring person in the world. She’s above Cheney now for me. And that is saying a lot, let me tell you.
June 6th, 2006 at 3:35 pmLook, she’s an elitist from New Canaan, Connecticut who hasn’t a clue as to what is going on outside of her repressive, narrow-minded, old-moneyed little bucolic community. Would anyone expect anything less from a dingle berry such as herself??
June 6th, 2006 at 3:54 pm#250 – We’d all love to make Ann a merry little widow, but first she would have to FORCE one of the 3,000,000,000 men on Earth to marry her.
That’s not the way I heard it. If you are a hard core ReichWingNut and if you appear to have “power” in government, well then, Ms. Ann will put out for you. Big time.
But I have to ask; Does anyone know with certainty that Ann is really a woman?
Afterall, with all the free sex that she gives out to Rethuglicans Fat Cats that “she” must really be “he”. Repugs are soooo into that homo gang rape thing that if she were really “she”, they wouldn’t give her the time of day…
June 6th, 2006 at 3:54 pmComment by Flush Dimbulb
I suggest you do some serious reading of the writings of the people themselves. George Washington, Ben Franklin, Thomas Jefferson ALL left behind personal writings to be read by future generations… once again .. I suggest you take the time to read them. They were LIBERALS and any attempt to mince words will not change that fact. Like many ex-conservatives that come to this site (including myself) Ben Franklin was quite conservative in a moderate way (aka he also started libraries for the poor masses so they could educate themselves for free or as you call it “welfare”) until he saw the true nature of the kings minions… once they belittled him in open court and refused to listen to his well thought out reasoning … he became a PATRIOT REVOLUTIONARY …. Ben Franklin believed in the power of the individual to make a way for themselves in life through commerce (capitalism), but did not believe in greed (see once again his creation of libraries and schooling for the poor and also his refusal to try to make profits off his invention of the lightning rod (gasp! socialism)). So he (and the others) were a mix of conservatism and liberalism aka MODERATES. They did not believe in just rebel rousing .. they had to be pushed past a red line. That red line for Ben Franklin was being called an unpatriotic traitor for simply standing up for his rights… a lesson your kind had better learn.. the outcome for you can be quite severe… tar and feathers anyone?
June 6th, 2006 at 3:55 pmPost-modern lprogressives co-opted the title liberal from the enlightened term “classical liberalâ€. FYI, Gerald, “Classical Liberal†does not describe YOU….
Good to see you are true to the tradition of the conservative know-nothing loyalists of that era. When did you decide to defend King George, and not fight him?
June 6th, 2006 at 3:57 pmBen Franklin was also a strict secularist and mused on the idea of reincarnation.
June 6th, 2006 at 3:58 pmSorry Comment by Flush Dimbulb … I should have qouted MA …
June 6th, 2006 at 3:59 pmFlavius Worfeus – sorry to burst your bubble but New Canaan is FAR from having trailer parks (I would know, I live in Stamford, CT which is a hop, skip and a jump from New Canaan). Trust me, the whole town is so snooty that they’d all drown if it rained … you know, that upturned nose thing they’ve mastered … they like showing their utter distain for Stamfordites and anyone else who doesn’t hail from “Old New Canaan” … except, of course, the elitists on the other side of Stamford in Greenwich. On those very, very few occasions I must sully myself by driving through New Canaan, I purposely blast the stereo while driving down Main Street – just to piss them off …
June 6th, 2006 at 4:01 pmMy Eyes! My Eyes!
June 6th, 2006 at 5:02 pmI pity you Ann Coulter….. but on the other hand, I can understand your anger….. If I were a woman like you (whoa, did I really say that?!), and my adams apple was bigger than my bra cup size – like yours obviously is, I would have a lot of vented up anger as well.
Ann, you are repulsive. Oh, Ann, don’t forget, lying on a voter registeration document is a felony. Hope you go to jail.
June 6th, 2006 at 5:07 pmI’ve NEVER seen someone enjoy HATE so much as Ms/? Coulter.
June 6th, 2006 at 5:11 pmPost 234 > the press refuses to look into Ann’s background, even though her identification documents are forged > she even signed her voting card in Florida checking the box for MALE > whoops she forgot to check female box since she is actually a guy playacting as female!
Comment by Jay Randal — June 6, 2006 @ 2:52 pm
Why don’t YOU look into Jay Randal? And don’t forget to source your information; links would be helpful.
June 6th, 2006 at 5:24 pmANN COULTER YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELF!
June 6th, 2006 at 5:26 pmI’ve never seen so mauch hate as I do in these messages left by left-wingers who undoubtedly consider themselves to be open-minded and compassionate.
LMAO @ you tools.
June 6th, 2006 at 5:44 pm# 236
June 6th, 2006 at 5:50 pmBruce…Way to go.
The funny thing is, this happens all the time on both sides of the isle. Things are politicized. I’m sure the Swift Boat Veterans were and with Cindy Sheehan, she had politicos gameplaning with her many mornings in Crawford.
Instead of having honest debate, the present political climate has become about “winning.” Getting your spokespeople to be beyond reproach…Coulter has a good point, although it’s hiding under venom and hate. You can’t question the Swift Boat Veterans, they were there with Kerry and they know the REAL story. You can’t question Cidny Sheehan, she lost her son.
BTW, there are plenty of bomb throwers on both sides of the isle. Coulter is one of the conservative ones.
June 6th, 2006 at 6:05 pmLook at all these liberals comments can’t debate have to make personal attacks what a bunch of cowards Liberalism is a mental disorder you loose everytime
June 6th, 2006 at 6:07 pmWhat is it about the knee jerk left that gets so excited about a chowderhead nitwit like Ann Coulter? She’s playing all the fools who pay attention to her like a piano.
June 6th, 2006 at 6:09 pmI can’t believe the Liberal hypocrites that say SHE is full of hate. Read some of their posts. Who is the Hater? Anne makes a fantastic point. The Liberals wheel out the amputee lawmaker to Crawford, they use the 9/11 widows, they use the Sheehan death, they use Chistopher Reed, they use Srah Brady and her disabled husband. See a pattern here? Ooohh we are victims and we are the authority! You can’t question us our we will call you meanies. I guess this is sort of handicapping their game?
June 6th, 2006 at 6:16 pmIsn’t it funny that a right wing jerk would post that we hate Anne Coulter in a thread about how much Anne Coulter spews hate.
Up is down
Black is white
War is Peace
And Anne Coulter is a bucket of love.
June 6th, 2006 at 6:21 pmThe ones who are really to blame for Coulter’s remarks are the networks that give her a free ride. They’re the ones responsible for the destruction she causes.
Comment by John
To John,
June 6th, 2006 at 6:22 pmI agree, but add on the groups that pay something like $30,000 to hear Ann-thrax say things like she isn’t a big fan of the First Amendment and the only way to talk to liberals is with a baseball bat.
Thanks Veronica.
Truthfully I was just clowning around, I’ve never been to Conn but I do have a picture of Annie Oakly sitting on the side porch of a lime-green doublewide in her knee length jean cutoffs and a old nasty tshirt that puts most wife beaters to shame, and aiming her Walmart rifle at whatever.’
You know what they say, you can take the girl out of the trailer park, but you can’t take the trailer park out of the girl.
June 6th, 2006 at 6:22 pmLook at all these liberals comments can’t debate have to make personal attacks what a bunch of cowards Liberalism is a mental disorder you loose everytime
Comment by Jim — June 6, 2006 @ 6:07 pm
Wow.
Thats like one long sentence.
June 6th, 2006 at 6:23 pmDidn’t they teach punctuation in the “special school” Jim?
June 6th, 2006 at 6:24 pmAnn Coulter is becoming the most hated female in the United States > whoops I mean the most hated MALE in the US > she just wears dresses and make up like Mighty Aphrodite on here > lol.
Comment by Jay Randal —
I’ve long regarded Mighty Hypocrite as an Ann-thrax Coulter wannabee: same foul language and vitriol, same unsubstantiated rants, etc.
June 6th, 2006 at 6:25 pmThe “problem” with Ann Coulter is that she is practically alone in putting forth a certain style of debate: she doesn’t pull any punches. The right generally is cowed by the rabid barking on the left, and afraid that if they react how they feel they should, THEY will sound like the left.
Ann Coulter is probably the only one on the right — and I include Rush Limbaugh, all Pats, etc. — who has the appropriate tone. I repeat: she is the only one who says what needs to be said, without concessions. Her peer is Laura Schlesinger in another arena (social, rather than political) — similar courage to say what needs to be said, similar intelligence. Good potential but less prominent is Tammy Bruce — and my list ends.
I’m not very clear why there are only women on it, but here’s an attempt to sustain the hypothesis that it’s not a coincidence… What the left has done is create the equivalent of an abusive relationship with those who disagree. Women may have more experience in recognizing and fighting abuse.
This abuse results in undue influence within the debate. I’m sure the left doesn’t mind that, since it’s to their advantage, but it nevertheless deters us all from achieving proper conclusions. (I.e. when you shut someone up you win only in the short term.)
June 6th, 2006 at 6:25 pm#274 – I agree, Worfeus. Do you think Jim means “loose” or “lose?” I like how he capitalizes Liberalism, that’s nice. I’ve always been a fan of punctuation.
June 6th, 2006 at 6:26 pmLook at all these liberals comments can’t debate have to make personal attacks
Comment by Jim — June 6, 2006 @ 6:07 pm
LOL, like Ann Coulter doesn’t make personal attacks. BAWAH HA HA HA HA
Hell she makes her living on personal attacks.
June 6th, 2006 at 6:27 pmAnn “C” with the mud/blonde sea-hag hair draped over her pinched face, has a long history of pitbull raging: In her August 2005 rant about Cindy Sheehan, she says: “To expiate the pain of losing her firstborn son in the Iraq war, Cindy Sheehan decided to cheer herself up by engaging in Stalinist agitprop outside President Bush’s Crawford ranch. It’s the strangest method of grieving I’ve seen since Paul Wellstone’s funeral. Someone needs to teach these liberals how to mourn.”
She rambles on: “Call me old-fashioned, but a grief-stricken war mother shouldn’t have her own full-time PR flack. After your third profile on “Entertainment Tonight,” you’re no longer a grieving mom; you’re a C-list celebrity trolling for a book deal or a reality show.”
One could never accuse AC of being old-fashioned and certainly not compassionate. But look who’s talking about trolling (Ms. Troll) for a book deal! Do us all a favor: Have a buzz-cut & get rid of that mess on your head; find a good shrink immediately; stop writing books; call Bill O’Reilly and make a one-way reservation to the front lines in Iraq with no body armor, no toilets, no makeup, dried food that can be rehydrated using dirty water or urine, and …. DON’T COME BACK! We have plenty of hatred & “evil doers.”
June 6th, 2006 at 6:28 pmWhy do we even listen?…
Here’s Ann Coulter writing about the September 11 widows:These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by grief-arazzies. I have never seen people enjoying their husbands…
June 6th, 2006 at 6:28 pmAnn sure has you libs all riled up… She’s getting just what she wants…to see the libs ranting and raving and showing their true colors.
If she’s as worthless as you say, why do you care what she thinks or says?
June 6th, 2006 at 6:32 pmJune 6th, 2006 at 6:32 pm
Anne Coulter doesn’t debate anything. She goes on right wing talk shows, spews hatred and then the right wing talk show hosts feign being upset. Get a grip. If you like this vile person, you are just as bad as she is.
June 6th, 2006 at 6:32 pmHas Southpark done a parody yet on (M)Ann? I haven’t see one, but would sure like to!
June 6th, 2006 at 6:33 pmJune 6th, 2006 at 6:35 pm
June 6th, 2006 at 6:39 pm
As a Progressive Born Again Christian I am appalled at her. How dare she say that Liberals are Godless?? Would a Christian harass women who lost husbands?
I would love for Progressive Christian Ministers like Jim Wallis and Toni Campola to get more air time.
Christ was all about caring for the poor, loving your enemy, and turning the other cheek. It’s horrifying how the right has hijacked his message of peace and turned into hatred and intollerance.
Is it Christian to cut off poor children’s health care? Is it Christian to cut old people off Medicare? Is it Christian to write memos justifying torture? Is it Christian to cut school lunch programs so multimillionaires can have bigger tax cuts?
Most democrats say they are Christians, it’s about time we take back the message and show that caring for the least of us, the environment, finding peacefull solutions to probles is the Christian way!
June 6th, 2006 at 6:39 pmTalk about thep ot calling the kettle black – who is talking about politicizing tragedy!?! HELLOOOO!
Besides, how the heck does she talk about families dressed like a skank?
June 6th, 2006 at 6:41 pmI like an and think she is pretty good a calling things out. To bad she creates such a stir for Democrats and Left-Wing types…she must be hitting a nerve out there.
June 6th, 2006 at 6:42 pmHave you heard of “milking it for all it’s worth”? Do you know anybody who does that? There aren’t many — most people are decent — but there are some. Ann Coulter dared to point out that some 9/11 families are on that list.
This tactic is not new. It’s in fact the basis of class warfare, going back to Lenin and the gang… The underdog status lets you make outrageous claims before anyone feels morally justified to push back — which in some cases happened too late, and for everybody (i.e. the pyrrhic victory of comunism, everybody lost).
June 6th, 2006 at 6:43 pmCoulter’s took Christianity on the brown-shirt plan.
A couple of hail Mary’s, a few Seig Heils, and you goosestep yourself right into the kingdom.
June 6th, 2006 at 6:44 pmI like an and think she is pretty good a calling things out. To bad she creates such a stir for Democrats and Left-Wing types…she must be hitting a nerve out there.
Comment by Jim — June 6, 2006 @ 6:42 pm
Ahh, I see you heeded the punctuation tips. Now time to get out the speak-n-spell Jimbo, and learn about proper nouns.
An, is something you say when describing something, like an otter. Or an owl.
Ann is spelled with 2 n’s, and the A is capitalized.
Yup. Even for her.
June 6th, 2006 at 6:48 pmI never encourage the kind of mean insults that you’re reading in these comments – never except for Ann Coulter, who is begging on bended knee for mean insults. She and Michelle Malkin. What kind of psychotic says something like that and is aware that she’s saying it?! These two women are the freak show of the RNC’s big tent.
June 6th, 2006 at 6:50 pmAlso what is pretty good a calling things out mean?
You mean she sits there and just sort of shouts stuff out, like Tourette’s?
And when you say, “a calling things out” is that how all you hill folk talk?
June 6th, 2006 at 6:51 pmThen you should really like me for calling you out as a low life piece of sh!t.
June 6th, 2006 at 6:52 pmWhat I like so much about Ann Coulter is that she really pisses off self-righteous, wine-sipping, racist, pro-Israel, war-mongering bigots. Those people deserve to be pissed off.
June 6th, 2006 at 6:52 pmMean Daniel?
That was nice.
June 6th, 2006 at 6:52 pmAlways in her tongue-in-cheek style, Ann Coulter did make a valid point that a handful of those 9/11 widows used their husbands’ untimely and tragic death as a springboard to jump into the forays of post-9/11 post mortem — feigning themselves as some sort of experts on national security, some gurus on matters of war and peace. Give me a break. If they really want to mourn and grieve in the public limelight and in an exhibitionistic sort of way, going on the Oprah would be a better platform. Come on, do you really take seriously what’s coming out of the big-haired heads of those Jersey Girl? Speaking of Jersey, when it was exposed that former NJ governor(D) hired his foreign-born butt buddy as NJ’s counter-terrorism advisor, did those Jersey girls even give an iota of public denuciation? I don’t think so.
June 6th, 2006 at 6:53 pmResponce to comment #33 #267:
June 6th, 2006 at 6:55 pmYes, you can question Cindy. I personally know a man who lost his son in Iraq and he sent a letter to “W” telling him to stay the course in Iraq. No one, I mean NO ONE has reported this in the liberal media or played it up like Cindy has been played up. This is the hyprocracy of the left that Ann is refering to: “Cindy can’t be questioned” but conservatives like my friend are ignored by the liberal press. This is the point of fact that Ann is making and the point of fact that the liberals chose to ignore at all cost. May I suggest to all of you liberals, click your heals together and say “I want to return to reality”. Oh wait; for liberals, reality IS somewhere over the rainbow.
Nice Eric.
Send me a postcard when you get to hell.
In the meantime, you might consider the fact that these women, the people in here, everyone who is speaking out everywhere in the world against your murderous band of mutants, are all working to end the killing, and save human life.
These women lost a human life that was close to them, either in the war or in 911.
I’d say that earns them a right to use their status to excercise their free speech.
God knows Ann Coulter does it every chance she gets.
June 6th, 2006 at 6:57 pm“spews hatred”… “vile”… “bad”… “Jews mix the blood of now-Jews in their bread and eat it”… “US is the Great Satan”… “gay muslims are the enemy of Islam”… Can you tell where YOU stop and “real” hate begins? I can’t.
Liberals in education unite and celebrate: we have our very own Madrassas!
June 6th, 2006 at 6:57 pmAnn is right on the mark and it just eats you guys up doesn’t it. You are proving her point she can’t talk about the “grieving” widow Ms. Shehan without being blasted as cruel. Remember the fact that Cindy hasn’t even picked out the headstone for her sons grave yet. How long has she been on tour in the USA and Europe now? The govt. pays for it, all she has to do as a “grieving” mother is pick it out. Think about your son Cindy not selling your new book. What? Yes, Yes, Yes that’s right she had time to write a book but no time for the memory of her son. Quite reveling isn’t it!
June 6th, 2006 at 6:59 pmNo one, I mean NO ONE has reported this in the liberal media or played it up like Cindy has been played up. This is the hyprocracy of the left that Ann is refering to
Comment by Revoir — June 6, 2006 @ 6:55 pm
Well, perhaps we are “hypocrac’s“, whatever the hell that is, but quit your crying about the widows speaking out.
You can whine, stammer your feet, throw a tantrum or doe whatever it is you babies do when you can’t have your way, but don’t think for two seconds that these women don’t have every right to speak out for what they believe.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:04 pmShe is a true patriot and has great breasts.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:04 pmRevoir , Eric.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:06 pmExcellent posts!
I read through some of the posts – I think you are all so p*ssed because she touched a nerve! Ann dares to question the motives of people in the media, those who rant. Dont like it? Well, if she wasnt right, it wouldnt make you so angry. I say right on Ann – dont stop! (You know she wont, thats what we love about her!)
June 6th, 2006 at 7:07 pmOne other thing – you guys HAVE to know that it make her day when you get all riled up…Its good clean fun.
Revoir , Eric.
Excellent posts!
Comment by Piper — June 6, 2006 @ 7:06 pm
Get a room.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:08 pmI think she did amazingly well. Whats wrong with thinking before you answer a question. I happen to find her an honest breath of fresh air. Thank god for her.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:10 pmYes, I can. If you think Ann Coulter is a good person, you are a bad person. Period.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:11 pmI think I just threw up in my a little. Blech.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:12 pmLOL I know what Spudge is boy
June 6th, 2006 at 7:12 pmSpudge boy, you are quite the judge. I guess you have superior skills at assessing the “goodness” in a persons heart? I guess there really is no room for debate with you – Ann was talking about people like you…all your left with is trying to smear…quite revealing.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:13 pmThat is true. Cindy has been run through the mud by the liberal media, where Bush is only given praise, even though his poll numbers have been below 35% for 2 1/2 years. You are a retarded knucklehead.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:14 pmIf she has been through the mud by the media than I’m a knucklehead. The media just about french kissed that girl.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:18 pm[...] Today is June 6th, or as people are using it for marketing purposes these days: 6/6/06. Satan, reincarnated, made an appearance on NBC’s Today with co-host Matt Lauer to plug her new screed that I wouldn’t even use to wipe my rear with. In her interview, Coulter was questioned about a passage in her book where she attacked the widows of September 11th victims (via Think Progress): These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by grief-arazzies. I have never seen people enjoying their husbands’ death so much. (emphasis from Think Progress) [...]
June 6th, 2006 at 7:19 pmI think she did amazingly well. Whats wrong with thinking before you answer a question. I happen to find her an honest breath of fresh air. Thank god for her.
Comment by Luke — June 6, 2006 @ 7:10 pm
Luke.
Just stay where you are. Don’t get excited. When the little white truck pulls up with the red lights, and the nice men knock on the door, just put the jacket on they give you and go with them.
Later, they’ll give you Ice Cream.
:D
June 6th, 2006 at 7:19 pmAnd Ann Coulter has every right to call them on it when they start playing politics! Politics affects us all, it’s too high a price to let some drive the debate unchallenged, just because they assign a certain significance to a personal loss.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:20 pmCindy hoy are you today? Cindy what do you think anout this and that. Cindy what do you think about our presedent. Ulp I think I just threw up a lot.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:21 pmkeep going spudge. You champion liberalism in the truest leftist fashion…down with discourse! The odd thing to me is that liberalism prides itself on its intellectual supremcy – odd that its proponents dont know how to defend their ideas, without the ad hominem attacks… but we have seen this before, havent we? Many illustrious leaders proceed you…Heil!
June 6th, 2006 at 7:21 pmIts amazing anyone takes her seriously.
Personally I don’t think she believes half of what she says. She claims she does, but I think she’s more like a “Faith Healer”.
She sees the sheep baaa’ing in the corner, so she leads them along.
After all, its been quite lucrative for her.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:22 pmOOPS! FLAVIUS `WORFEUS I misspelled a word.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:22 pmNo Piper.
Actually you misspelled 4.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:26 pmwow – so many trolls at once! ann really needed all this support? it’s like a freeper-fest!
speaking of the anti-christ… in honor of 6-6-06, thom hartman (filling in for sam tonight on majority report radio/ air america rado) just talked about this fun filled fact:
1. google “unside down star” (in quotes) – find out what it is
then
2. go to gop.com en espanol page... check out the elephant logo
GASP!!!
June 6th, 2006 at 7:27 pmCoulter is a monster.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:27 pmHere are my projected translations into english, the words that you spelled.
(Understand I don’t have a Rosetta Stone here).
Hoy is spelled How.
Anout is About.
Presedent I think its safe to assume is supposed to be President.
Ulp??? Here I have no clue.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:29 pmann is a hottie any of you low lifes would love to be her or have her for 1 night I love you thanks for telling it like it is
June 6th, 2006 at 7:29 pm“uPside down star” duh
June 6th, 2006 at 7:31 pmAnn is really a transvestite whore. A Pre-op trannie.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:31 pmHo Chi – you wish.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:33 pmGo Ann, keep putting it back in their faces. Matt Lauer has never been nothing but another blathering talking head. The interview was a classic example of media CRAP! Which is all that comes out of NY anymore. True objective journalism is DEAD and has been for some time now. And another thing, this issue of the “Polls”, have you seen the polls, Bush is down in the Polls…. Let me just say that any intelligent person realized a long, long time ago that the polls do not mean nothing. They are merely media tools to try and sway peoples thinking. Sometime I wonder if they only call people in NY when taking the so-called “Polls”. It will be interesting to see how the remnant of their show will perform after that nauseating Katie Couric is gone.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:33 pmOh yeah? Well then: if YOU think Ann Coulter is a bad person, YOU’re a bad person!
–
Ok, that’s too dry… Let me see… Ok: you’re not just bad, you’re slow. So damn slow you’re like a fat man trying to have sex with a jar of peanut butter. You’re like the pasty stuff that comes out of a blackhead pimple. You’re lucky you’re among friends because you may just get your teeth kicked in. (Urban Dictionary — http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=spudge)
June 6th, 2006 at 7:34 pmI hear you doing the superior dance Flavius.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:35 pmAnother one of the elite that John Kerry hob nobs with no doubt.
Long live Rush.
Go David.
ann is a hottie any of you low lifes would love to be her or have her for 1 night I love you thanks for telling it like it is
Comment by hot for ann — June 6, 2006 @ 7:29 pm
Another grammatical wizard I see.
You guys really have a pension for spelling Ann’s name in the lower case. Could it be you guys secretly disrespect her in some way?
Also I noticed the lack of punctuality. Its like one long sentence.
Either Jim or you are one and the same, or there is some sort of cranial deficiency in republicans and right wingers that just makes them stupid.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:35 pmTrillium, read post 321 – it goes for you too…very intelligent…
June 6th, 2006 at 7:36 pmby the way – the only significance of going to that page (en espanol) is that the logo is the largest, easiest to see…
June 6th, 2006 at 7:37 pmWoa, Flavius, score DUDE for the left…awesome.. LOL
June 6th, 2006 at 7:37 pmAl Franken is Coulter’s clone…on the left of course. Both are jerks.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:40 pmPlease don’t lump all conservatives with her. I think she is despicable. I also have never thought she was even slightly pretty. That long, stringy hair?? She’s free to say as she wishes, but nobody should give her a soapbox for this insane ranting. My son is in the Navy, in a dangerous place. Her comments are a smear on all the young people serving our country.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:41 pmOf course, I can forgive typos.
Everyone makes them when they’re frustrated and upset.
It’s that fat fingering that comes from pounding out a quick answer cause your hearts racing and you can’t stand the fact that that little bastard on the other end said this or that.
Happens all the time.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:42 pmIs what these widows doing anything like raising the threat level every time the president gets caught in a lie or using 9/11 as there own political agenda or the president giving out turkey in Iraq, or using a blonde short skirted bimbo to attack the people that the right has no balls to. All these right wing pundits have one purpose: to attack the left w/ hate and vile insults so their leaders don’t have to do it. They are used then thrown away. Did you see all the people who came to Rush’s aid when in trouble? How about all they did for Anne with her troubles? These people have no credibility among anyone with half a brain. They want to get to you to start an argument about some insane idea so they don’t have to face all the administrations mistakes. They are sent out there by the right wing to antagonize. Can you give any credibilty to a group that justifies the murder of innocent woman and children? Is this the american way? If someone is holding a family hostage w/ a gun then the right thing to do is go in and kill everybody? Is that what we do in America? These people been drinking their own bathwater
June 6th, 2006 at 7:43 pmI agree with her 100%
June 6th, 2006 at 7:43 pmwhy are you arguing with all these silly trolls – go have some fun – see #325
June 6th, 2006 at 7:44 pmbe sure to google “uPside down star”…
I can’t believe anyone but fox would even give her air time. All it does is help sell her
June 6th, 2006 at 7:44 pmbooks to mentally challenged idiots like the last few commentators, and her brand of
hatred is just babblings of an insane person. I have never wanted to hit a woman in
my life, but in her case I’d make an exception. I wonder why Matt didn’t ask her about
her voting record in Florida….
Yeah Christine and Congressmen on the left running their mouths is helpful for our boys in harms way.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:44 pmCoulter Hit another home run and SMACKED down the bed wetting liberal media and dimwitcrats today.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:45 pmI don’t get it. Is this like the sound of one hand clapping? Or something from Scientology test 22B3? I go mourn now — loved “ADD: A Different Perception”, and now to find out he’s a freaking lib?!?… Ahhh… And now “Memories” of when I loved Barbra fill my eyes with sorrow…
June 6th, 2006 at 7:47 pmYou know what? When 911 familys sued the Saudi royal family Bush family lawyer James Baker’s Law Firm defended the Saudis …
Explain that one you Benedict Arnolds. Why dont you go to your true home Saudi Arabia and dont cry about wanting to come home when we start droping bombs on those assholes.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:47 pmAnn Coulter LOVES being vilified and hated by liberals or anyone with two neurons firing. She is a shrill, mean spirited, arrogant person. I am reluctant to say woman. in her case.
As for her rants, there is a great line from the movie “As Good as it Gets” when Jack Nicholson, after hearing from an obvious Latina about how to care for his mugged and robbed neighbor, ends his little speech to her with the words, “Go sell crazy somewhere else. We’re all stocked up here.” That’s what people need to say to Coulter, no matter where she goes, and what she says. It fits her perfectly.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:47 pmSpeaking of Bimbos remember it is just a vast right wing conspiracy.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:48 pmI don’t get it.
Comment by trillium — June 6, 2006 @ 7:47 pm
imagine that…
June 6th, 2006 at 7:50 pmMy what a big Adam’s apple “she” has, it REALLY IS bigger than her cup size. BTW Alan,(#331) EEEEWWWWWW!!!! I’d castrate myself first.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:52 pmWhat a wonderful day it would be for our republic if only
June 6th, 2006 at 7:52 pmPresident Bush were to appoint Ann Coulter to the
Supreme Court. As soon as Justice Stephens,
or Justice Ginsburg, are forced to quit due to their
health problems. Let’s start an email campaign
to draft Ann Coulter for the US Supreme Court.
You forgot to add people like
June 6th, 2006 at 7:54 pmPope John Paul II
Reagon
Pat Tilman
Jessic Lynch
Yeah Christine and Congressmen on the left running their mouths is helpful for our boys in harms way.
Comment by Piper — June 6, 2006 @ 7:44 pm
One would think getting our boys in harms way, out of harms way, would be helpful, don’t you think?
June 6th, 2006 at 7:56 pmpoint set match WMD
June 6th, 2006 at 7:56 pmOh thats right.
You’re a republican.
You don’t think.
You believe.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:57 pm…And they’re off fighting among themselves!
Hey, it’s a food fight, what do you want?…
June 6th, 2006 at 7:58 pmYes just leave those people to their own devices that’s nuclear devices knucklehead.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:58 pmAll you who agree w/ her , obviously have never lost anyone close to you in a war or a terror attack. TSK -TSK, YOU’LL GROW UP SOMEDAY LITTLE BOYS AND GIRLS
June 6th, 2006 at 8:00 pmQuick Def. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=knuckle-head
June 6th, 2006 at 8:01 pmWhat a wonderful day it would be for our republic if only
President Bush were to appoint Ann Coulter to the
Supreme Court. As soon as Justice Stephens,
or Justice Ginsburg, are forced to quit due to their
health problems. Let’s start an email campaign
to draft Ann Coulter for the US Supreme Court.
Comment by swabbie — June 6, 2006 @ 7:52 pm
Scurvy is it?
Your problem is you just don’t get it, do you?
Your times up pardner.
Parties over dude.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:02 pmTalk [back] radio is more right than left because of its consumers’ feedback loop. The other side believes; THEY think.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:04 pmNazi Party that is.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:04 pmIt is so funny that so many trolls will come out to protect the transvistite known as Ann Coulter, but still want to ban gay marriage. Any of your idiots who say Ann is hot are talking about a guy. Therefore, you are gay and homophobic.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:05 pmThank you for admitting that these talk shows are just right wing talking point lectures. I tried to make that point many many posts ago, but you morons will only beleive sh!t if it comes from your side. Thanks.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:07 pmYou “believe” in Intelligent Design, and try to pass laws to teach it to our kids with science.
You “believe” God hates homosexuals so you try to pass laws to restrict their freedoms.
You “believed” that Saddam had WMD, so you BUTCHERED over 100,000 people.
Like I said, you don’t think, you believe.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:08 pmIt’s such a big world that those guys fighting amongst themselves over there is OK, can’t spread to the USA, but lets not talk about that liberal mantra Global Warming.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:09 pmTo Spudgeboy, I’m not sure if Ann Coulter is a transvEstite or not, but tell us why you would make such a revolting comment. How old are you? Your comments are extremely juvenile.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:09 pmI think they called him the BUTCHER of Bagdad. Before we removed him and now they have the beginnings of democracy.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:11 pmPlease forgive if this has already been stated. (funny how you want to respond after reading 3 posts and then realize there’s a few hundred)
I would love to know why any netword continues to put Coulter on the air?
They know what they’re getting into when they book her, so it makes me wonder.
To answer an eariler post: If Coulter is not a real conservative, then the real conservatives need to speak up and denounce this cretin. They need to stand up and disavow the whole lot: DeLay, Bush, Rove, Coulter, Hannity…you know who you are. They need to denounce the nutty Pat Robertson and the evil Falwell. But they don’t. Isn’t this the same argument that they make against “moderate muslims” who don’t speak out against the radicals?
If the ‘real’ conservatives don’t publicly, and constantly disavow nutjobs like Coulter and the blatant hate-filled disrespect for all things good…they inherit them.
If they don’t denounce these people, then they support them.
You’re either sane…or you’re with the terrorists.
Seriously..they need to disavow these people, or they are secretly cheering them.
Think about all that implies.
-Chuck
June 6th, 2006 at 8:12 pmBlackWednesday.org
Originally posted by FLAVIUS WHATEVER:
Another grammatical wizard I see.
You guys really have a pension for spelling Ann’s name in the lower case. Could it be you guys secretly disrespect her in some way?
Also I noticed the lack of punctuality. Its like one long sentence.
Either Jim or you are one and the same, or there is some sort of cranial deficiency in republicans and right wingers that just makes them stupid.
It’s penchant, is’t it Mr. Grammar Nazi?
LISTEN EVERYONE
EIther this kind of flame throwing is ok or it’s not. You don’t get to crab and whine when someone you don’t agree with starts doing it, but rationalize when it’s your guy. This is the thing that drives me crazy about the poilitical discousre in the country right now. People point fingers at the other side and a) either forget when their side does the same or b) ignore it becasue they would rather be “right.”
June 6th, 2006 at 8:12 pmThank you David. I believe I agree.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:13 pmPiper is right, Saddam Hussein was the Butcher of Bagdad and he killed far more of his own people than anyone else and he exported it by paying the families of Palestinian suicide bombers.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:14 pmIf Ann Coulter can spew hatred and have all of you a$$holse back her, then I am free to call you what you are, a$$wipes.
BTW, I am old enough to be your dad and kick your a$$.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:18 pmTo Erik, good post, you are absolutely right, this is not discussion. It is ranting… If you start at the top you can see the whole discussion devolve into what it is now.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:19 pmYou are correct and the trolls here protecting Ann the man wouldn’t have had to hear any of my BS if Ann wouldn’t have made such a rude comment, but she did and the trolls decided to back her up, so the mary go round goes around again.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:22 pmTo Spudge Boy, I’m sorry if you are upset but there is no need for derogatory language. As I often tell my sons, the use of profanity is simply an inability to communicate intelligently. You are not here to discuss issues like and adult, you are clearly here to put other people down.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:23 pmIm sorry, I agree with her. Its very telling to hear that Matt did not consider Iraq part of the war on terror- at this pont anyone who cannot connect the dots and see that there is a much bigger picture to islamic terror and thats its all connected is simply never going to get it.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:27 pm“Piper is right…”
Hardly. Not that the statement in itself is incorrect, but it’s not relevant.
At all.
A pointless comment. You act as if no one realizes what/who Hussein was/is.
How utterly ignorant.
If Hussein’s atrocities was the stated reason for the invasion and occupation of Iraq, that would be one thing. But that’s not how it worked.
WMD’s, remember? If Bush were interested in protecting human rights in Iraq…well, that’s certainly not how it worked out, now is it? Not to mention, if that were our gfoal, there are better countries to start in. Places with even worse leaders, even worse crimes against humanity. Iraq was the low hanging fruit. Kind of like a few of you trying to turn this into a “Saddam was a bad guy” thread.
Of course he was. You might as well state: “I am against murder.”
Well…of course you are. Anything else to add? No? Good.
Now that that’s settled, I’m gonna make myself a nice cup if coffee and enjoy the rest of a beautiful evening.
Just remember: No one supports Saddam in any way. But that still doesn’t justify this war, and it’s cost in dollars, and blood. Keep that in mind the next time you decide to get out the Bush Pom-Pom’s. People are still dying over the lie.
-Chuck
June 6th, 2006 at 8:27 pmTo all of you–The truth hurts, and Ann makes you feel like the scums you are.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:28 pmDavid,
You are correct. I am tired of trying to have discussion with idiots that want this country to be less than the great country that I served in the military to protect. When people like Ann Coulter state such blatantly hateful things and then trolls come here to back her up, I will not be nice. Sorry, there is no room in this society for the kind of bile that comes from Ann Coulter. If she is free to say that sh!t and you think it is fine, then I am free to reply back with the same kind of sh!t.
Now if you want to admit that ANn was wrong and would like to discuss how to bring this great nation back together, now that Bush and parasites like Coulter have torn it apart, then fine.
If you do not, then I don’t really care and will be happy to jump into the mud slinging.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:28 pmAnn’s book just went to # 5 on Amazon.com today from #39 yesterday.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:32 pmI predict a #1 by this weekend.
I think this blog helps sell her books.
I just bought it.
Thanx to the Today show and the haters on the blog for making me feel GREAT when I bought it.
Carry On, you right wing booksellers….Carry On!
This from the guy that was the first to call us A**holes. Lets just sing Coom-ba-ya and stick our heads in the sand.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:34 pmExcuse me if I say that I believe and will always believe that Saddam had WMD. They are somewhere and will be found or used one day. At least 1 Iraqi General has testified to this. As for Bush, as a republican, I am not happy with him or any of the elected republicans. But, to me, they are better than the alternative. I have swore to myself that no matter what, I will not vote for any incumbent candidate for a long time. Too bad we cannot get the whole country to vote them all out, democrat and republican, and just get a whole new batch. As for Ann, she is the one catching it today, tomorrow the media dance will go on and the bickering over the confusion and lies they create will continue.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:35 pmThanks for the laughs guys – gone to get a cold one.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:39 pmSpudge Boy – I think you and I have made progress. If you are, as you say, a veteran, then I salute him and thank him for his service to OUR country and I am proud of what you did. We still clearly disagree in regards to Ann but we can have a civil discussion.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:41 pmThe fact that the MSM gives Coulter the air time is all the proof one needs to demonstrate that they are as bankrupt, ethically, morally and otherwise, as in fact Coulter thinks and says they are.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:42 pmwhy are you sorry to agree with her? I’m happy to agree. Ann has it right on.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:42 pmThe fact that the MSM gives Coulter the air time is all the proof one needs to demonstrate that they are as bankrupt, ethically, morally and otherwise, as in fact Coulter thinks and says they are.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:42 pmI love the way Coulter gets the nutball left wingnuts into a froth. I personally wish she would run for president and Malkin for VP. The louder the leftards whine and grovel just means that Coulter is getting to the truth. Like Jack says- “you can’t handle the truth”. Coulter just reflects what most of us hicks here in “flyover country’ really feel. The lunatic left in America just all get their periods whenever she speaks. The rabid criticism of of Coulter just show the utter hypocrisy of the the left wingnuts. I guess political correctness only applies to certain left wing icons and chosen minorities.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:42 pmhave fun wingnuts.
ps- we here in the real America know that “progressive” is just liberalspeak for commie.
I thought all you leftards were going ot move to france or canada or something- howcome you are still here? have a nice day, just have it somewhere else.
I don’t want Ann Coulter to stop having a platform to talk. Crazy loons from the Right and Left should get their airtime, as long as the host doesn’t give them a fee ride. Matt L. made some attempt to make her explain her lunacy here. For the longer version of this clip, see
She’s such a loud and obnoxious person who, like O’Reily and a lot of your other voices of hate, doesn’t really allow debate to happen. It’s all sound and fury.
She operates by talking fast and pretend-angry over everyone with selected soundbites and, as noted above, her breasts. It’s nice, and rare, to see someone calling her on her bull with her own words. which don’t stand up. She usually gets a free ride due to her fast and clever tongue, combined with her paradoxically slutty look. She’s got the racing/wrestling/megachurch crowd cupped in the palm of her hand as she stokes their bruised egos. It’s getting tough being a white male.
The dittoheads and O’Reily geniuses will still see her as the smartest woman in the world, instead of a clever but shallow mouthpiece for the dark side.
For an emaciated big-mouthed byatch, she sure has a lot of admirers. Think it has anything to do with her “look”? Gets the racing/wrestling/megachurch crowd everythime–”What a breath of fresh air!”, “I find her honesty refreshing”.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:45 pmLeftards…..HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH
June 6th, 2006 at 8:45 pmNow that’s funny..
How do the 30% that are still left end up on this blog anyway?
June 6th, 2006 at 8:47 pmFirst of all Coulter is talking about a GROUP that calls themselves “The widows of 9/11.” For those of you who think she’s talking about ALL widows of 9/11, unfortunately you’re delusional and easily manipulated.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:48 pmNow there is something I can agree with. Except the part about WMDs. But, everything else is right on the button. The US government needs an enema. There is no red or blue in Washington, only purple. These guys are all in bed together. We need a governement of the people and for the people.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:50 pmTo the left, why is Ann’s freedom of speech called “hate” ? She is not a Imam in London spouting Jihad, she is not a Imam in Dearborn Michigan spouting hate against the goverment and christians, she is not a ranting muslim in a storefront prayer mosque in Toronto spouting hate and murder. Please explain….
June 6th, 2006 at 8:51 pmCoulter and Malkin on a ticket. Wow, I’ve heard it all now.
See, the problem *is* flyover country. You have more in common with God-fearing Wahabis then you do the Coasts.
You can have those two hate-spewing, lowlife, loudmouth tools if you just set up Jesusland and secede so the best of America can just do it’s own thing unimpeded by Creationists and “patriots”. We’ll even throw in M. Moore and Wierd Al Sharpton for you to poke with sticks.
I love you post, man. Your sentiments, and you spelling, say it all. GO USA!! GO USA!!
June 6th, 2006 at 8:52 pmReal Americans believe in the Constitution, real Americans don’t disparage our heros, talk about giving comfort to the enemy, you all are right o0n target.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:53 pmChris:
I know real Americans
I’m friends with real Americans
YOU SIR ARE NO REAL AMERICAN
YOU ARE A NEO NAZI
The first example came in the the context of President Bush’s current push for a constitutional amendment that would prohibit gay marriage. The liberal mantra on his initiative, as exemplified by Ann Curry’s performance on yesterday’s Today, is that this is a cynical political ploy and a waste of time when there are myriad ‘real’ issues out there to be addressed.
Right out of the box, Lauer invited Ann to buy into that logic:
“David Gregory said if you ask people what they care about they say Iraq and gas prices. Gay marriages are way down on the list, but that’s what the president is talking about and what the Senate is taking up. Why?”
Coulter would have none of it:
“I don’t know what people are talking about or how David Gregory knows that. But I do know that gay marriage amendments have been put on the ballots in about 20 states now and passed by far larger numbers than Bush won the election by.”
Matt then hit Ann with a classic exemplar of perceived liberal truth – the musings of a WaPo columnist. Lauer:
“Here’s how E.J. Dionne puts it in the Washington Post: ‘The Republican party thinks its base of social conservatives is a nest of dummies who have no memories and respond like bulls whenever red flags are waved in their faces.’ Do you agree with that?
Coulter: “That the base are dummies or that Bush thinks that?”
Lauer: “That he can wave a red flag and they will run to the polls to respond to him?”
Coulter: “They don’t need to respond to him. He’s not running again.”
Lauer: “They want the voters to turnout in the mid-term elections. They don’t want to lose control of the congress.”
Coulter: “Maybe they want to do what the voters want. Whatever you can say about whether or not Bush has a mandate, the mandate against gay marriage is pretty strong. It passed by like 85 percent in Mississippi. Even in Oregon, and that was the state that the groups supporting gay marriage fixated on and outspent their opponents by like 40:1, it passed even there. There is a mandate against gay marriage.”
Lauer: “Do you think George Bush in his heart really cares strongly about that issue?”
Coulter: “I don’t know what anybody cares in his heart.”
Lauer: “Would you take a guess?”
Coulter: “I know what Americans think because they keep voting, over and over and over again overwhelmingly they reject gay marriage. So why is that a bad thing for politicians to respond to what is overwhelmingly a mandate?”
Ann’s rejection of Lauer’s liberal logic was again on devastating display a bit later in the interview. Lauer suggested that Pres. Bush’s low approval ratings are attributable to Iraq. That in turn engendered the following exchange.
Coulter: “I don’t think so. That’s the one thing he is doing right and that the Democrats are incapable of doing. That is fighting the war on terror.”
Lauer: “But I am talking about the war with Iraq, not the war on terror.”
Coulter: “I consider them the same thing. We didn’t invade Guatemala.”
Cue the rim shot!
June 6th, 2006 at 8:55 pmHow do the 30% that are still left end up on this blog anyway?
Comment by phillyfan — June 6, 2006 @ 8:47 pm
What a great question!
(29% BTW)
I guess…that’s a testiment to the popularity and truthful impact ThinkProgress has.
I love that it drives them so crazy their minions must defend what’s left of their so-called honor.
-Chuck
June 6th, 2006 at 8:55 pmBlackWednesday.org
David,
I don’t mind having discussions with conservatives. Both my parents are and we talk about politics all the time. They don’t go into this mud slinging stuff. They can actually have conversations without name calling.
But, I am tired of the hate speech. The Sean Hannitys and Ann Coulters of the world spew. It is what is dividing this country. If you are intelligent, you will understand that a divided country is a bad thing. The us versus them atitude has got to go. The American people need to wake up to the fact that our government is intentionally pushing the us and them mentality.
It is bad for the US. Nobody will “win” if this keeps going. The greatness of this country is diversity. If everybody was the same, this would be a very boring place.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:56 pmWhenever I wonder if the Angry Left is mounting a serious challenge to the ‘Extreme Right’ (i.e., the right-most 75% of this country), I come here. Lo and behold, I get 300+ examples of baseless, self-righteous drivel, mocking everything from Ann Coulter’s looks and people who live in trailers to Christianity. And just when I’m feeling comfortable that the Left represents no intellectual threat whatsoever, you guys are nice enough to seal the deal by sinking into vulgar name calling.
I love this site. Keep up the good work.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:56 pmI am a real REPUBLICAN and after 6 years of listening to liberals blather on and on about how Mr. Bush is ruining this country I can honestly say that if Ann Coulter causes your hemorroids to swell and itch FINE BY ME.
The political atmosphere was poisoned by YOU not us. The 2000 election was won FAIR AND SQUARE. And Gore REALLY WAS A MORON, AND STILL IS. For all his faults Mr. Bush left more intelligence in the toilet this morning than Algore has been able to piece together neuron-by-neuron in his entire brain-dead life.
Furthermore, I have actually read MANY posts by MANY liberals since then calling for VIOLENCE in the streets. I have read MANY posts by MANY liberals denouncing Christians as less-than-human (VERY similar to FACIST rhetoric) and SCREAMING for MY rights to be taken away by force if necessary.
Well, on that account you can collectively bite my shapely Puerto-Rican-Texan ARSE. I AM SICK TO DEATH OF EACH AND EVERY ONE OF YOU SICK LITTLE IMMORAL TREASONOUS WHINERS AND I AM HAPPY IF ANN COULTER MADE YOUR PATHETIC LITTLE DAY!
June 6th, 2006 at 8:57 pmGood way to put it Spudge, this country needs an cleaning out from Washington down to the local city and county councils. Replace them all! Term Limits Now, No more career politicians. They are serving themselves and destroying the country like no external enemy could ever do.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:58 pmDavid,
Come on.
That is hateful and not true and you know it.
June 6th, 2006 at 8:58 pmBTW…how can anyone defend garbage like this:
How do some of these people sleep at night? Tell me.
-Chuck
June 6th, 2006 at 9:00 pmBlackWednesday.org
What a filthy pig she is.
June 6th, 2006 at 9:02 pmYou know the worst part is that this has come down even farther. I have found this type of stuff all the way down to the school association. These are people who don’t even get paid to do the job, they just want power. We had to sue a lady who wouldn’t give up her post as the school association president. And here is the best part. Her kids had been out of the school for 3 years. SHe just didn’t want to give up her “power” What power. Tod decide if the Father Daughter camp out should be on March 3rd or March 10th.
Besides the government, people need to change also.
June 6th, 2006 at 9:03 pmComment by ramrod_the_republican — June 6, 2006 @ 8:57 pm
“Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!”
[hands ram a tissue]
-Chuck
June 6th, 2006 at 9:04 pmBlackWednesday.org
Matt Lauer has two different sets of standards for politically provocative authors. If you are on the left he laughs with you, if you are on the right he slams you. On this morning’s Today show Ann Coulter’s statements drew outrage from Matt but last October when Al Franken suggested Karl Rove and Lewis Libby be executed for treason Matt and the Today show crew laughed. Lauer’s interview with Coulter got particularly testy when he read excerpts from Coulter’s new book and demanded she defend them. The following is the most explosive portion of this morning’s Coulter V. Lauer showdown:
Matt Lauer: “Let me give you some quotes from your book, alright? These are random. ‘Environmentalists…”
Coulter: “Yes! Now we’re on a subject I want.”
Lauer: “‘Environmentalists’ energy plan is a repudiation of American Christian destiny which is jet skis, steak on the electric grill, hot showers and night-skiing. Liberalism is a religion. A comprehensive belief system denying that the Christian belief in man’s immortal soul.’ And you go on to say, ‘liberalism is the opposition party to God.’ How do you think Democrats who believe in God are gonna feel about that statement?”
Coulter: “They probably won’t like it. They don’t like a lot of things I say.”
Lauer: “Is it a fair statement you think?”
Coulter: “Yes, yes.”
Lauer: “How about this one?”
Coulter: “That’s why I wrote a book about it.”
Lauer: “Referring to liberals again. ‘To a liberal 2200 military deaths in the entire course of the war in Iraq is unconscionable but 1.3 million aborted babies in America every year is something to celebrate.’”
Coulter: “Yes.”
Lauer: “You think people celebrate…”
Coulter: “They manifestly do. They are huge rallies for it. That is the one issue that’s more important to the Democratic Party than any other. I mean Bill Clinton, the last…”
Lauer: “Do you think they celebrate the right to choose or, or the actual abortion?”
Coulter: “The last candidate the Democrats got into the White House was Bill Clinton. I, I take that as a fair assessment of whom the Democrats will choose as their representative. Bill Clinton sold out every single special interest group. The criminal rights group, the welfare bureaucrats. The one group he would not stand up to were the abortion ladies. Vetoing bans on partial birth, a gruesome procedure passed by overwhelming majorities in the House and Senate. Twice, Clinton vetoed that. That tells you what the Democratic Party thinks about abortion.”
Lauer: “Do you, do you believe everything in this book, do you believe everything in the book or do you put some things in there just that cater to your base?”
Coulter: “No of course I believe everything.”
Lauer: “Alright on the 9/11 widows and in particular a group that had been outspoken and critical of the administration. ‘These self-obsessed women seem genuinely unaware that 9/11 was an attack on our nation and acted as if the terrorist attack only happened to them. They believe the entire country was required to marinate in their exquisite personal agony. Apparently denouncing Bush was an important part of their closure process.’ And this part is, is the part I really need to talk to you about. ‘These broads are millionaires lionized on TV and in articles about them reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by grief-arazzis. I’ve never seen people enjoying their husbands’ death so much.’”
Coulter: “Yes.”
Lauer: “Because they dare to speak out?”
Coulter: “To speak out using the fact that they’re widows. This is the left’s doctrine of infallibility. If they have a point to make about the 9/11 commission, about how to fight the war on terrorism. How about sending somebody we’re allowed to respond to? No, no we always have to respond to someone who just had a family member die…”
Lauer: “But aren’t they the people in the middle of the story?”
Coulter: “…because then if we respond, ‘Oh you’re questioning their authenticity.’ No the story is…”
Lauer: “So grieve but grieve quietly.”
Coulter: “No the story is an attack on the nation…”
Lauer: “And by the way…”
Coulter: “That requires a foreign policy response. That does not entail the expertise…”
Lauer: “And by the way they also criticized the Clinton administration for their failures leading up to 9/11.”
Coulter: “Oh not, not the ones I’m talking about.”
Lauer: “No they have.”
Coulter: “No, no, no. Oh no, no, no, no.”
Lauer: “But is your message to them just grieve…”
Coulter: “No, no they were cutting commercials for Kerry. They were using their grief in order to make a political point while preventing anyone from responding.”
Lauer: “So if you lose a husband you no longer have the right to have a political point of view?”
Coulter: “No but don’t use the fact that you lost a husband as the basis for your being able to talk about it while preventing people from responding. Let Matt Lauer make the point, let Bill Clinton make the point. Don’t put up someone I’m not allowed to respond to without questioning the authenticity of their grief.”
Lauer: “Well but apparently you are allowed to respond to them.”
Coulter: “Well yeah I did.”
Lauer: “Right so in other words…”
Coulter: “But that is the point of liberal infallibility. Of putting up Cindy Sheehan, of putting out these widows of putting out Joe Wilson. No, no, no you can’t respond it’s their doctrine of infallibility.”
Lauer: “But what I’m saying is they’ve…”
Coulter: “…somebody else make the argument…”
Lauer: “I’m saying I don’t think they’ve ever told you, you can’t respond. So why can’t they make their point?”
Coulter: “Look you’re getting testy with me.”
Lauer: “No I’m not. I just…”
Coulter: “Ohhh.”
Lauer: “I think it’s, I think it’s, I think it’s your dramatic statement. ‘These broads,’ ‘you know are, are ‘millionaires stalked by grief-arazzi.’”
Coulter: “You think I shouldn’t be able to respond to them.”
Lauer: “‘I’ve never seen people enjoying their husbands deaths so much.’”
Coulter: “They’re, they’re, yes. They’re all over the news.”
Lauer: “The book is called Godless: The Church Of Liberalism. Ann Coulter always fun to have you here.”
Coulter: “Hey where’s Katie? Did she leave or something?”
Lauer: “She did. 7:17am. And now here’s Ann.”
June 6th, 2006 at 9:06 pmAwwww… you poor, pouting, whining lib-turds are all upset about Ann C. on Today Show? She got your pantyhose in a wad? May I suggest you call Ted Kennedy and have a sob-fest in his bourbon cabinet? Awww…. poor stinkin liberals… pout some more now….
June 6th, 2006 at 9:07 pmYou would have to admit that some of them have taken advantage of their situtations. It has been in the news and even in some of the NY TV shows(Law and Order). Be careful about absolutes! I feel for all who have lost a loved one, but that does not give them exclusivity on this.
June 6th, 2006 at 9:07 pmUm…yeah. We saw it. Thanks. :|
-Chuck
June 6th, 2006 at 9:09 pmBlackWednesday.org
But did you catch the end…
June 6th, 2006 at 9:10 pm#413 David Leigh, I suppose you also support all of the (republican) child molesters as well? And speaking of alcoholics and their liquor cabinets, why not use dubya as the example instead of Ted Kennedy? Notice I didn’t call you names, either. Idiot… Oops!
June 6th, 2006 at 9:20 pmWow. Over 400 comments on a liberal smear page and not one nice thing to say. Obviously none of you have read anything she has written and just take sound bites you catch on web clips. You keep on proving her point with every venomous diatribe you utter. Hmmm..I see ‘filthy pig’ I see ’she should be shot’. The intelligent ramblings of the looney left. I’d be shocked to not see my post wiped off for not agreeing. It’s the same reason people are fed up with celebrities using their fame to push their agendas. Do not one of you understand we get the fact these widows are grieving and they have that right? That they also have the right to a political opinion? They’re using their idea of their grief for political gain. That’s what is truly disgusting. Lauer and (Coulter slapped down) Couric are the epitome of the leftist media. I applaud you all for being so brave to seek the company of your own sort and feed your own delusions. All you keep doing is making Ann’s point for her.
June 6th, 2006 at 9:22 pmIt’s penchant, is’t it Mr. Grammar Nazi?
LOL, Grammer Nazi here.
Comment by Erik — June 6, 2006 @ 8:12 pm
Ahh, I see we’re learning.
Yes, I do tend to have a little mental dyslexia when it comes to homonyms. Point to you.
That’s one for you and how many again for me? :D
But remember, at least I didn’t spell President with 3 E’s.
June 6th, 2006 at 9:23 pmHonestly, we, as Americans, deserve all this. We deserve Ann Coulter, we deserve Louis Farrakhan, we deserve Al Franken, we deserve Jesse Jackson, we deserve Rush Limbaugh, and we deserve the crap we get in Washington. Honestly, the best thing that could happen is that every incumbent, Democrat and Republican, get voted out of office. The people in Washington take us for granted and we enable them by arguing amongst ourselves. Nothing will change until we show them who’s boss. And I’m not sure if that’s going to happen anytime soon.
June 6th, 2006 at 9:24 pm[...] 666 ann coulter number of the beast [...]
June 6th, 2006 at 9:24 pmOne of the worst insults in life is to be ignored by those whose attention you desire. The best thing that Americans can do is ignore this bitch. No publicity, no people at her events, don’t by the book, no interviews etc. Turn your back & ignore the bitch. Is she a woman anyway? It’s a worthy question. Bill Maher should be able to answer the question. He’s alluded many time to having sex with her. But then, maybe he got fooled by a great surgeon.
June 6th, 2006 at 9:25 pmWhy are some of you people so hateful. This is a travesty, calm down and discuss, we all have more in common than we admit. Is this really the way the left talks and thinks. I may agree with Ann Coulter on most things she writes, but I do not advocate or encourage this type of discussion at any time. Reading this blog has darkened my opinion on the human race. Is this all we are…..
June 6th, 2006 at 9:26 pmCNSNews.com has an exclusive interview with Ann Coulter today as her book “Godless” The Church of Liberalism” hits the book stores. She tells Randy Hall that abortion is the “virgin sacrifice” of the liberal “religion” she describes in the book. Coulter goes on to say that one of the main goals of the American public education system is to force small school children to become atheists. Coulter takes on the spectrum of what she considers liberal doctrine, ranging from global warming and stem-cell research to “dry” toilets. Here’s a sampler of her lines:
Cybercast News Service: During his May 10 appearance on the “700 Club,” Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean said: “One of the misconceptions about the Democratic Party is that we’re godless and that we don’t have any values. The truth is we have an enormous amount in common with the Christian community, and particularly with the evangelical Christian community.” How would you respond to his statement?
Ann Coulter: Who knew Howard Dean had a sense of humor?
Cybercast News Service: Do you think U.S. Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) and U.S. Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.) will ever admit they were wrong for claiming in September 2004 that President Bush had a “secret plan” to reinstate the military draft after the presidential election? Or does their military service insulate them from having to apologize?
Ann Coulter: Excellent question! No.
Cybercast News Service: In your book, you state: “If you gave all the money in the United States to the public schools, they would not improve; they would simply cost more.” Can you envision any federal attempt to improve education at the local level that would be effective?
Ann Coulter: Yes, abolish the Department of Education and bring RICO suits against the teachers’ unions.
June 6th, 2006 at 9:28 pmi meant to say “I do not advocate or encourage this type of discussion at any time, REGARDLESS of political affiliation, religon, or anything”
June 6th, 2006 at 9:29 pmIn the wake of the Ann Coulter interview on Tuesday’s “Today” — specifically the part where Matt Lauer simply couldn’t believe Coulter’s attacks on 9-11 widows channeling their grief into anti-Bush attacks on TV news shows — here are a few reminders of how the Kristen Breitweisers of the world (who endorsed John Kerry in the fall) were given the lion’s share of attention by network hosts like Matt Lauer.
An MRC study of relatives on the morning news shows found the disparity of anti-Bush victim relatives to pro-Bush relatives was 20 to 3. (The report concluded, “These relatives are entitled to their views, of course. But network viewers are entitled to a little balance, too.”)
A week earlier, it was already obvious Breitweiser was doing election-year publicity against Bush:
On this morning’s Today and for multiple segments in a 90-minute post-Condi Hardball special on MSNBC, only four widows were singled out as judges of Rice’s testimony. The four were celebrated in the April 1 New York Times as “nonpolitical.†NBC has emphasized Kristen Breitweiser, who has appeared in four Today interviews in four weeks.
Mrs. Breitweiser insists that she voted for Bush in 2000, but has wildly declared that “Three thousand people were murdered on Bush’s watch.†Times arts editor Frank Rich also noted how she tartly complained that a Showtime 9-11 docudrama failed to display President Bush reading to school children “while people like my husband were burning alive inside the World Trade Center towers†because it would have been contrary to “Karl Rove’s art direction and grand vision.†She’s hardly “nonpolitical.â€
At the time, Brent Bozell noted that part of the unfairness was that networks like NBC never discovered widow/experts to rail against the failures of Clinton against terrorist attacks:
Meanwhile, a Nexis search quickly shows that NBC has aired no news story with the words “widow” and the U.S.S. Cole, where terrorists killed 17 Americans in 2000. NBC aired no news story with the words “widow” and the embassy in Kenya, where terrorists killed 12 Americans in 1998. NBC aired no news story with the words “widow” and the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia, where terrorists killed 19 Americans in 1996. These grieving families have never been given a nationwide TV platform on NBC to express their opinions on how the Clinton administration handled investigations of those incidents.
When Breitweiser appeared in Kerry ads in October 2004 and traveled the country with the Kerry campaign, Brent Baker reported in the CyberAlert that CBS pretended she was just a random voter in Ohio, instead of a valued campaign spokesperson.
Even in December of 2004, as the widows reprised their act, Bozell revealed the networks couldn’t notice that Breitweiser & Co. signed up for the Kerry campaign.
CNSNews.com has its own interview with Coulter on her new book: She tells Randy Hall that abortion is the “virgin sacrifice” of the liberal “religion” she describes in her new book, “Godless.”
June 6th, 2006 at 9:33 pmhehehe… let the games begin! You can tell when the leftards can’t dispute the facts they resort to the Nazi card. You left wingnut goose steppers have more in common with anybody on the right. The left is more maniacally fascist than any rightwinger. Anyone that calls into question any of your sacred cows gets the full dose of spew and hate. It would almost be funny if it was not so pathetic and hypocritical . the fact that you leftards actually believe the dung splattered logic you espouse is a sad comment on the state of the socialist left in America.
June 6th, 2006 at 9:44 pmWho the hell are you or anybody else here in left wing Disney land to tell me I am not American?? Who the hell do you self described holier than thou anti- American traitors think you are. In your maniacal left wingnut evangelism you sound like you are trying to convince yoursel of what you are saying.
Ann coulter has more truth in one of her columns than I have ever heard from the left wingnut hate machine. Your comical and juvenile specualtion as to her sexuality is typical of your utter hypocrisy. i thought gays and trangenders and dykes and other sxual misfits and deviants were saints to you left wingers. Or is that only applicable to things that YOU say?
Keep posting the attacks – it is hilarious to see leftards PMSing and getting their birkenstocks and copies of The communist manifesto and Che t-shirts soiled with their own feces and urine over the truth.
Get yourselves a paper towel, clean the spooge and spittle-froth off of your chins and try to think with your brains and not your sexual and defacatory organs for a change. You guys are so funny.
I’m a widower-Anne’s right. People don’t want to ever question us. If you decide to get into the political free for all then it comes with the territory to get criticized-the widowed don’t deserve a free ride. Keep on kickin butt Ann!!
June 6th, 2006 at 9:46 pmCoulter is so intellectually superior to these pretty msm entertainment stars that a real debate is not only unfair but boring as well.
June 6th, 2006 at 9:54 pmDavid,
Even if some of the widows are using this, just as Cindy Sheehan has, to get acros their political point of view, that gives Ann COulter no right to say that they are enjoying their spouses deaths. You know that as well as I do.
June 6th, 2006 at 9:55 pmHow long have you known Ann? Dan. Thats what I thought –
June 6th, 2006 at 10:23 pmThe only people who have grown here in the last hour are Spudge and David.
Piper is right, Saddam Hussein was the Butcher of Bagdad and he killed far more of his own people than anyone else and he exported it by paying the families of Palestinian suicide bombers.
Comment by David
DONT YOU BELIEVE IT!
You people cannot be supporting the Butcher of Baghdad when it suits you and then crusade against him as if you are valiant knights the next moment when it suits you. You are not saviors of the people of Iraq. You are twisted dark hearted selfish manipulators. How many Iraqis died because of your man Rummys policies and all the other Nixonian/Reaganite policies? Then all the sudden 911 happens and you become “THE SAVIORS OF THE DOWNTRODDEN OF IRAQ!!!! DUN DUN DUN!!!! HERE THEY COME TO SAVE THE DAY!!!!”
……..
Who do you think we are? ITS ALL ON TAPE FROM THE 1970s TILL TODAY… Do you think we are blind? And what about those 15 Saudis that ATTACKED AMERICA on 911? Were they Saddams personal MECCA POLICE? Did they hatch the 911 plan at the direction of his Muslim holliness Saddam Sallam the Great? What is the fantasy you have dreamed up for yourselves that could POSSIBLY justify letting BUSH and the NEOCONS fly the Saudis out of America after 911 instead of them being interigated here in America? AND Let Bush and the NeoCons do absolutely NOTHING to the Saudis and call them ALLIES!!?!?!?!? AND … AND then divert America into a WWII Germany style pre-emptive attack on a country that had NOTHING to do with 911? So you are not cowards… you will hoop and holler and kill rag heads … so what? Are you traitors? Are you going to let the Saudis smugly smile and puff on their cigars while those people jumped out of those buildings to their deaths at WTC…. and GET AWAY WITH IT? You are either completely insanely retarded or you feel that the deaths of a few thousand Americans is WORTH the Bush family and Exxon/etc relationship with the Saudis…. which is it? Hmmmm Ann? Rush? Orielly? Which is it? We dont buy the Iraq distraction…. which do you choose? Americans or Saudis? Which is it? those SUVs make you want to have just a few more sips of that precious precious oil? Hmmm? Which is it?
If you were going to do something about 911 you would have already done it. Afghanistan was only an outpost. Iraq was a PNAC dream. But the Saudis…. now that is a totally different matter. And you did NOTHING. Keep sipping away… because all the future of America is going to see ALL OF THIS on the Internet forever and they will know what you did and did NOT do.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:27 pmHey chris, Thanks for letting me know that their stil passing out the kool aid. It’s a shame that your so blinded by your loyalty to the right that you can’t see that what they NOW stand for is totally uinAmerican. At one time the Republican party stood for everything that most Americans value, maybe that was before you were born, it’s really sad your too closed minded to understand that what you espouse is unAmerican. Who am I to call you Unamerican. I’m an American, read the Constitution and Bill of Rights and come back and argue that your still an American. It’s very sad
June 6th, 2006 at 10:27 pmhehehe… let the games begin! You can tell when the leftards can’t dispute the facts they resort to the Nazi card. You left wingnut goose steppers have more in common with anybody on the right. The left is more maniacally fascist than any rightwinger. Anyone that calls into question any of your sacred cows gets the full dose of spew and hate. It would almost be funny if it was not so pathetic and hypocritical . the fact that you leftards actually believe the dung splattered logic you espouse is a sad comment on the state of the socialist left in America.
Who the hell are you or anybody else here in left wing Disney land to tell me I am not American?? Who the hell do you self described holier than thou anti- American traitors think you are. In your maniacal left wingnut evangelism you sound like you are trying to convince yoursel of what you are saying.
Ann coulter has more truth in one of her columns than I have ever heard from the left wingnut hate machine. Your comical and juvenile specualtion as to her sexuality is typical of your utter hypocrisy. i thought gays and trangenders and dykes and other sxual misfits and deviants were saints to you left wingers. Or is that only applicable to things that YOU say?
Keep posting the attacks – it is hilarious to see leftards PMSing and getting their birkenstocks and copies of The communist manifesto and Che t-shirts soiled with their own feces and urine over the truth.
Get yourselves a paper towel, clean the spooge and spittle-froth off of your chins and try to think with your brains and not your sexual and defacatory organs for a change. You guys are so funny.
Comment by Chris
You could take every left in this guys message… replace it with the word right and it would be completely true. This is what the reichwingers have done… this is what I have been saying on here… they have made a concious effort to take all the LANGUAGE of the left and coopt it so that it doesnt sting when it is used on them anymore. Calling them goosestepers used to really piss them off… but now they call the LEFT goosestepers !!! heeheh and it no longers hurts their little black hearts. I wonder if their masses are really that psychotic to not see this langauge switch or if they get what their leaders have done and are just going with it as the sheep that they are? You see… NOW the right are CHAMPIONS!!! no less of 1) LIBERTY! hehehehahaha ya ya right ok… 2) FREEDOM! (!) freedom to be anything they say you can be… 3) COMPATION!!!!!! except for the poor and blacks.. oh and some jews… and all muslims… well except the ones that help make up the fake war intelligence… 4) EQUALITY!!! except for gays and women … oh and blacks again…
WWJD? I really REALLY dont think you have any clue… seriously.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:40 pmI don’t give a Tinker’s Damn what Ann Coulter looks like; nor do I care a whit what her alleged gender is…
June 6th, 2006 at 10:44 pmWhat counts to me is this: For what does she stand?
Does she really stand for “conservatism?†Or does she stand for the Straussian / Trotskyite philosophies of the Latter – Day Bolsheviks (read Neo Conservatives)? You mean this same “conservative†who has called for torture, the detention of citizens without charges and internal check points?! “Conservativeâ€, My Ass!!!
I’m tired of hearing these discussions about “Left Wing†v. “Right Wingâ€. Both wings are of the same bird! Many of these so-called “debates†taking place between these “celebrities†are staged WWF – like dog-and-pony shows for public consumption. The goal – to get us fighting with each other and ignore politicians’ trampling of our rights – no matter WHICH side of the frigging aisle they are on! The argument should not be about “Liberal†v. “Conservativeâ€, but Freedom v. Slavery. George “I Love Gun Control†Bush, “Pills†Limbaugh, Coulter, and Dick “I Love PNAC†Cheney, et al are too busy wiping their asses with the Constitution to read what it REALLY says!
Just because there is a letter “R†in front of a name doesn’t make one a TRUE patriot. As a Life Member of Gun Owners of America, I know of what I speak of…
Make fun of Coulter and her ilk, laugh at them; deride them. They can’t stand it. Above all, ignore them.
#[…] Only one sighting of the devil today so far, she/it was barking unintelligible gibberish to Matt Lauer. Fortunately, the devil is not too bright. […]
I think Satan kicked her out of hell for being too evil and mean-spirited.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:57 pm#423 — Yes, I personally don’t usually write down and dirty, but Ann brings it out in us. She, her whole career, like many other right-wing hate-media stars, is all about character assassination and out-of-context cherry-picked facts and quotes.
She is smart, as is Rush and O’Liely, but they, like some here, scream unfair for dishing out a little of what these media whores do everyday in their hateful books and shows. They don’t want debate, don’t kid yourself.
“Liberal smear page”. That’s a little much.. This thread doesn’t even compete as a venue for smears with the mouth of the Coulters and Malkins. They deal with smears, they know innuendo and hate, that’s what they do. They are the stars of political hackery.
The Left has its own, but they don’t do as good a job, because their heart is less into it, in general, being more concerned with “fairness”. The Right does it better, understanding power better, going for the gut better. It’s the difference between the Gore campaign and the Bush mafia in Florida.
This is my first ever visit here, and you get your angry posters here just like you do on countless other sites, so don’t be shocked. This is a place to let off steam–it’s like the House of Commons. If you want to see real spew, go on over to that proud piece of Republican fairness and civility which is the Swift-boat Vets for Peace. You want to really feel discouraged about America and its future, look at that right-wing nuthouse. I’m no Kerry fan by a long shot, but how they helped the Rove machine pump up an AWOL rich-kid slacker and rip Kerry’s resume apart was a low point in our political history. It’s amazing what 20 milliion bucks will buy.
This silly argument about the widows is just typical. Coulter is over-the-top rude and hypocritical, spouting false or misleading facts and impressing the vast stupid Middle with her quick (though shallow) tongue and her breasts.
Politics is full of hypocritical cant on both sides of the political divide, it’s just that Coulter and her fellow travellers take it to the extreme, and then have the constant gall to accuse more reasonable people of the craziness that she’s the master of. Her kind of America, like her psyche, is ugly, and if you don’t get that, well then I guess you might as well just continue to keep buying her books, listening to Rush, watching FOX to reinforce your fearful view of what’s important in the world.
If you want to have a reasoned debate on values, don’t look in a thread about Ann Coulter. Let her on all the media outlets, but pin her, make her explain her b.s.–don’t just let her make wild statements unburdened by a reality check, because then the stupid amongst us will take her as Gospel. She sure sounds confident, like any jerk in a bar on a Saturday night. Let her rant, but hold her to the truth and she’ll shrivel. It doesn’t happen enough, and this clip was not enough.
June 6th, 2006 at 10:59 pmLol Chris guy on here spews the same bile that I-Right-I used to do on TP threads > is Chris I-R-I, or his brother, or his lover?
Lots of other Ann loving trolls on here like “ramrod” > pathetic little creeps > Coulter had to pay them in some way to flood on here to defend her!
June 6th, 2006 at 11:16 pmDo I have this right–it’s ok for Bush to try and exploit 9/11 to get himself re-elected, but it’s unfair for the widows of the 9/11 victims to support a different candidate? One who isn’t trying to exploit 9/11?
June 7th, 2006 at 12:13 am[...] Comment by Ho Chi Minh — June 6, 2006 @ 7:31 pm [...]
June 7th, 2006 at 12:30 amA clown is someone who operates outside the conventions of society (such as civilized discourse), often to point out the absurdities of that society.
June 7th, 2006 at 12:42 am#5916,
I agree that she is useless windbag.
June 7th, 2006 at 12:42 am#430 Rackets,
Thats the ticket, I agree with you on that. Both sides are complicit in removing individual privacy and rights, either acitvely or passively. I really don’t give a rats a$$ about Coulter, this is a bigger picture issue.
BTW, I saw a bumper sticker that said “Coulter 2008″ and it was on a total junker peice of crap vehicle, so I couldn’t figure out if it was a joke.
June 7th, 2006 at 12:50 amDavid,
Yup there are hateful folks on both “sides”, and the extremes of “both sides” actually meet somewhere . I become hesitant to really commit to a label of left or right, both “sides” have nutjobs, and it just fuels the arguments and makes both “sides” right about each other. There is no real difference between Dems and Repubs, most all are influenced by power, greed, corporations, group think. “Our Democrats” have complied with the endless bullshit.
June 7th, 2006 at 1:00 am#430 Rackets,
If I could call a temporary cessation of hostilities…
Tinker’s Damn is actually Tinker’s Dam. It goes back to when repairmen (aka Tinkers) used little pieces of putty as a dam in which to pour molten metal to plug a hole or shore up something. The dam, once so used, was subsequently thrown away. Hence the use of tinker’s dam as an expression for something of no value.
OK. Back to the catfight.
P.S. I had to read your piece twice to believe it, but actually agreed with much of what you said. Must be the late hour and the Chimay.
June 7th, 2006 at 1:03 am[...] Today’s event that made people think, “Hey, I wonder if I can find a picture of her nude on the internets?”: [...]
June 7th, 2006 at 1:16 am[...] Not only is her show, “My Life On The D-List,” smart and highly entertaining, Kathy Griffin calls out all the right people like Ann Coulter. We all know Coulter talks out of her ass 101% of the time, but it seems like she’s granted entirely too much credibility through the mainstream media. The fact that anyone interviews her outside of Fox news is just a complete mystery. Anyway, Coulter was on the Today Show this morning about the 9/11 widows who forced the Bush administration to create the 9/11 Commission: “These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by griefparrazies. I have never seen people enjoying their husband’s death so much.” [...]
June 7th, 2006 at 1:31 amPost 441 lol > you will not find any nude pics of Coulter because you would see his penis > he cannot allow anyone to get a pic of that! It would expose him as a fraud masquerading as a female!
June 7th, 2006 at 1:55 amCoulter is a disgusting idiot. Especially when the 9/11 Commission made these 115 ommissions and distortions:
June 7th, 2006 at 2:03 amhttp://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20050523112738404
My lefty fellow citizens, I saw little or no factual rebuttal to Ms. Coulter’s statements in the preceding comments. People capitalizing on new fame, however they came by it – including by tragedy, is nothing new. Ann is only saying that their tragedy does not grant them dispensation to opine without being challenged, or any special insight into world events. This is true, and it may also be true that some of the widows are profiting finanically. It should never be a crime to utter truth.
June 7th, 2006 at 2:05 amCheck out this statement by the Jersey Girls last June:
September 11th Advocates: Statement Regarding 9/11 Commission Hearings
http://www.911citizenswatch.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=577&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0
Top 40 Reasons to Doubt the Official Story
June 7th, 2006 at 2:07 amhttp://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041221155307646
Post 445 > the one profiting from 9/11 is Ann Coulter by smearing widows whose husbands died in the WTC towers > nobody uses the death of a loved one to profit upon! Stop defending bigoted mean Coulter on here Bruce!
June 7th, 2006 at 2:16 amThere is a huge diference between this and this:
They may mean the same thing at the root, but one is an observation, the other is an attack.
June 7th, 2006 at 2:42 amSom when did we stop debating the actual issues and swap to the ‘ad hominem personal attacks’ style of politics?
Depite everything she has to say about the women themselves, NOT ONCE does she ever bother to address the issues they raised. That’s not politics, that’s cowardice.
June 7th, 2006 at 3:26 amIm sorry, I agree with her. Its very telling to hear that Matt did not consider Iraq part of the war on terror- at this pont anyone who cannot connect the dots and see that there is a much bigger picture to islamic terror and thats its all connected is simply never going to get it.
Comment by Shawn — June 6, 2006 @ 8:27 pm
A true example of walking into a battle of wits unarmed
Let’s review
For decades, the US propped up Saddam Hussein as a barrier to the spread of Islamic fundamentalism across the middle east
The main country that the US saw as pushing Islamic fundametalism was Iran
Now that Saddam Hussein is no longer in power, those Islamic clerics in Iraq are now seeking out deeper ties with their clerical brethren in Iran
So in the name of fighting Islamic fundamentalism, the Bush Jr Administration has now pushed the clerics of Iraq & Iran closer together
How, exactly, is that STOPPING “Islamic Terror” again?
And lets shed a tear for poor BitchBully Coulter and her mindless sheeple/lackeys/trolls
Hos sad & pathetic must they be to hypocritically whine about how poor Annie is talked about so roughly, but have no problems with annie speaking roughly-with complete lies-about others she disparages
If poor picked upon BitchBully Coulter can’t handle strong language tossed her way, then maybe she shouldn’t be the first to use it on others who have suffered far worse losses than she ever has
Let’s see, what have She & Malkin sacrificed for Dear Leader W’s Glorious Iraq Meatgrinder Crusade?
Oh, that’s right,
NOTHING-like the rest of the ChickenHawks backing the draft-dodging, budget-busting ChickenHawk with Delusions of Grandeur-President Jr-Malkin & Coulter are all in favor of others fighting the war they support from the safety of their stateside keyboards
Of course, personal courage, or personal responsibility are also concepts foreign to those still backing President Jr, traits they will never exhibit, possess or practice in any way
Actually, the only thing more pathetic than BitchBully Coulter are her sheepletrolls here-It’s like they think Coulter will actually notice their pathetic attempts at defending her grotesque attitude
Sorry losers, Coulter has no time for ANY of you defending her here, unless you’re throwing money away to buy her latest mentally-unhinged moonbat, goosestepping diatribes
No, the only ones BitchBully Coulter has any time for are those who feel just like Annie does, pure hatred towards as many people as possible-But you’ll only get on her “to-do” list if you’ve got money-which leaves just about any of her d-list trolls here out of the picture
And at the top of Coulter’s Crush List would be Usama bin Laden, a religious fanatic Coulter obviously admires and worships from afar
But since Annie’s not into the personal courage thing, then she’s subject to the same ChickenHawkery that President Jr has shown all his life
Poor annie, so scared to try and defend her positions with logic and facts, concepts also absent from all those who still back President Jr and his multimilionaire brother in arms and ideology, Usama bin Laden
June 7th, 2006 at 3:27 am[...] Ann Coulter, charmer. [...]
June 7th, 2006 at 6:43 amWhen hate-mongering Nazi whores spew their filth calling anyone who disagree with them as traitors who should be shot and or imprisoned, don’t expect kyndness in return. In his/her own words about Arab countries, “We should invade their countries and forcibly convert them to christianity at the point of a gun”.
June 7th, 2006 at 7:50 am[...] What a great statement about liberal American pacifism. [...]
June 7th, 2006 at 8:13 amMy lefty fellow citizens, I saw little or no factual rebuttal to Ms. Coulter’s statements in the preceding comments. People capitalizing on new fame, however they came by it – including by tragedy, is nothing new. Ann is only saying that their tragedy does not grant them dispensation to opine without being challenged, or any special insight into world events. This is true, and it may also be true that some of the widows are profiting finanically. It should never be a crime to utter truth.
Comment by Bruce
Whether you or Ann like it or not the fact of the matter is anyone that was involved in 911 has the RIGHT on their own to advocate their position on 911.. The democrats do not have to go out and round these people up! THEY WERE THERE. They have the right NOT because they are being paid by the DNC or whatever fantasy you are dreaming up. YOu are simply on the attack against anyone that disagrees with you whether they have a valid point or not. The agrument you are trying to make is totally bunk. It is as if you are saying a victim whose family is killed by some companies negligence has no right to participate in a lawsuit against the company because they were injured and are just using it as a tool to join in with that companies opponents. How REDICULOUS of a notion!. They WERE injured and they DO have a valid right to talk about it…. you just dont like that you are wrong and they are right and some of them happen to be democrats… well TOO DAMN BAD. You lose. Losers. If you were not a bunch of unAmerican turncoat Saudi Arabian appologists it would not bother you that they want answers and action taken because of their lose on 911.
June 7th, 2006 at 8:17 am#
I BELIEVE THAT ANN HAS THIS AFFLICTION!
What is androgen insensitivity syndrome?
Androgen insensitivity syndrome is a condition that affects sexual development before birth and during puberty. People with this condition are genetically male, with one X and one Y chromosome. Because their bodies are unable to respond to certain hormones (called androgens), they may have mostly female sexual characteristics or signs of both male and female sexual development (hermaphroditism).
Complete androgen insensitivity syndrome occurs when the body cannot use androgens at all. Partial or mild androgen insensitivity syndrome results when tissues are partially sensitive to the effects of androgens. People with partial androgen insensitivity (also called Reifenstein syndrome) can have normal female sexual characteristics, both male and female sexual characteristics, or normal male sexual characteristics. People with mild androgen insensitivity appear male, but are often infertile and tend to develop female breasts at puberty.
http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/ condition…itivitysyndrome
Comment by POOTER — June 6, 2006 @ 12:44 pm
June 7th, 2006 at 8:27 amI really don’t believe that Ann believes what she’s saying. She is just saying those things to sell her book and that’s ok in America because we believe in free speech.
June 7th, 2006 at 8:40 amYou mean hermorphidite! Yeah, makes sense. Her sexuality has nothing to do with the fact that she crossed the line.
June 7th, 2006 at 8:47 amI believe that Ann has a problem with President Bush wanting to ban gay marriage.
June 7th, 2006 at 8:49 am[...] Ann Coulter is right. Yesterday’s much maligned assault on the 9/11 widows, Cindy Sheehan, and our eyesight (she was in a cocktail dress in the early morning) contained an unmistakable truth: the only Democratic spokespeople that are reliably listened to are our infallible victims. [...]
June 7th, 2006 at 9:11 amAnn is only saying that their tragedy does not grant them dispensation to opine without being challenged, or any special insight into world events.
Comment by Bruce #445
So Brute,
…just what the hell are Ann Coulter’s unique “qualifications”…
…to be a propaganda who*e for right wing conservative scum?
…EVOLVE already…
June 7th, 2006 at 9:35 amI vote we let Ann Coulter, Pus limphog, Scum Vanity, Bill O’Lielly and ALL right wing scumbag TRAITORS PERSONALLY experience the horrors of 9/11 AND Iraq…
…and as soon as humanly possible….
June 7th, 2006 at 9:39 am#462, big papa,
June 7th, 2006 at 9:55 amI’ll second that one.
[...] Ann Coulter is right. Yesterday’s much maligned assault on the 9/11 widows, Cindy Sheehan, and our eyesight (she was in a cocktail dress in the early morning) contained an unmistakable truth: the only Democratic spokespeople that are reliably listened to are our infallible victims. [...]
June 7th, 2006 at 10:18 am[...] Think Progress has the Today Show video [...]
June 7th, 2006 at 10:31 amI’d like to see Coulter repeat to a 9/11 widow’s face what she said to Matt Lauer yesterday.
June 7th, 2006 at 10:34 amAnn is correct: Liberals choose martyrs that most are afraid to dispute (excepting Ann Coulter) because they will be accused of insensitivity or other such nonesense. To use your husband’s (or child or wife) death as a base to make outlandish political statements about a wartime president is very low class. When you all are through hating Bush, perhaps you can suggest some practical policy that has a chance of success (unlike most 20th century democrat foriegn policy, and having France like us does not count!).
June 7th, 2006 at 10:55 amJeff- Florida
I’d like to see Jeff tell a 9/11 widow, to her face, that her opinion is outlandish. You don’t have the balls :-)
June 7th, 2006 at 11:01 amJeff would never set foot in New York because he knows that his cousin-lovin southern ass would get kicked to the curb in NYC.
June 7th, 2006 at 11:03 amAnn is wrong. Anyone can speak out about the way the US reacted to 9/11. Nobody knows whatreallyhappened.com but the worst part is Ann probably does know who orchestrated the so-called ‘terrorist attack on America’. She probably knows the CIA and Bush’s cronies are behind all of this.
June 7th, 2006 at 11:04 amCoulter would not dare confront the 9/11 widows face to face. She lacks the real conviction to discuss these issues rationally – plus she would get her face slapped and she knows it. How could anyone think they have the right to ridicule or criticize grief? There’s a serious disconnect with reality there. It’s cowardly to trivialize these issues that threaten the entire peace of the world by calling people names and running and hiding behind a self-cultivated persona just for the sake of wealth and notoriety and extraordinarily dubious political viewpoints. She may be one of the most immature people to ever run at the mouth in public.
June 7th, 2006 at 11:05 amExactly Chimp parade. Just imagine what Coulter would have done if Matt Lauer had said “well Ann, it just so happens that we have a 9/11 widow right here who wants to talk to you” :-)
June 7th, 2006 at 11:10 amWow, Larry – now THAT would’ve been a show worth watching!
June 7th, 2006 at 11:14 amThese are all weak, childish responses to accurate criticism. Punching and slapping, “cousin loving”? Not very intellectual, but that is par for the liberal course, in lieu of logical arguements. I lost two colleagues in those towers and I go to NYC monthly, and have been to Iraq. My comment stands and I would tell any one of those millionaire self-entitled widows my opinion of how they have shamed their husband’s memory with their political circus grandstanding. Same for Sheehan. Now, stop being so violent and work on maturing your interactions with those you disagree with. Jeff-Florida
June 7th, 2006 at 11:22 amShe’s a man. A stupid, stupid man. And if you really think she believes half the inane crap that comes out of her disgusting pie hole of a head, you’re being duped. She’s a farce, an act, like Steve Colbert, but most people don’t get the joke. The right uses her to get the “god, guns and gays” nutjobs (thier base, in other words) all frothy at the mouth, then they go and quench thier thirst with the blood of newborn babies. She also has man hands. Frightenengly huge, gawky man hands. I bet she could palm Shaq’s head.
June 7th, 2006 at 11:25 amUsing phrases like “outlandish political statements” and “low class” is anything but mature. Get off the cross Jeff, someone needs the wood :-)
June 7th, 2006 at 11:29 amWhat is weak is stating on May 1, 2003 that the mission was accomplished followed by three more years of war and 2,000 plus dead soldiers. But that’s okay, after all the insurgency is in its last throes (for the last two years).
June 7th, 2006 at 11:32 am#295, Eric, you’re right. She was right on the money with pointing that out, and there is a certain validity to bringing out the handicapped/minorities as someone she cannot respond to, something that both Republicans and Democrats are want to do (black Republicans speaking at the RNC on presidential nomination night anyone?). She’s obviously at least half-way articulate. If she spent a little time honing her message maybe she could actually bring about some real change by creating the debate. Instead her message was totally distorted by her attitude and bad manners. Frothily, I might add. On top of that, Matt couldn’t get a word in during the clip. And you call that debate? Or responding to Ann’s vitriol with facts, like another poster announced…how could Matt Lauer give a rebuttal?
But speaking of the debate, what debate? A 9/11 widow knows firsthand the failures of our national security to defend against an attack, all the way down the chain: the FAA, NORAD, Air National Guard, the Navy, the Air Force, the Army, the Coast Guard…all the way down the chain. If you want to refocus the debate why don’t we center it on why the hell *every* *single* defense mechanism was disabled and unable to prevent this country from the attacks of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon (!!) on 9/11 in the first place? All of this other shit is just window dressing, but that’s where the debate should remain. The Pentagon, of all places, left defenseless?? WHO ARE YOU KIDDING?? I mean PLEASE…WHO BUYS THIS SH*T?
THE FIX WAS IN. THE FIX WAS IN. THE FIX WAS IN.
So far be it for a 9/11 WIDOW, someone who has actually got some skin in the War on Terror game — instead of her chickensh*t/chickenhawk leaders who have no family members, who themselves have never seen combat — to speak out against The Greatest Organized Crime Against Humanity in the history of humanity!
Ann and these PNAC jackasses are complicit in the Big Cover-Up, no more no less. Let’s get the debate where it should be, and it isn’t satisfied completely with the 9/11 Report throwing up its hands and saying “oh well, we don’t know what the f*ck happened either” (more of the Big Cover-Up).
June 7th, 2006 at 11:49 amSpeaking as a liberal, Ann is one of the best things we’ve got going. She makes the right look insane.
June 7th, 2006 at 11:56 amCharlie M
Speaking as a liberal, Ann strikes me as being the scariest thing since Hitler. Not because of her words, or her message, but because of those who buy into both.
June 7th, 2006 at 12:07 pmIf people feel they have to hate someone for what happened on 9/11, choosing to lash out at the widows gives the apparence of baiting the public’s attention with another red herring. Why should this president not be called on the proverbial carpet to explain why he started a war with Iraq when the suicide pilots were from Saudi Arabia? The widows and the whole country have a right to know what was and is behind the failed strategy to establish a military installation in Iraq when the war of terror had an entirely different focus and target from the moment it horrendously began on September 11th.
June 7th, 2006 at 12:16 pmSpeaking as a liberal, Ann is one of the best things we’ve got going. She makes the right look insane.
Comment by Charlie M
Speaking as a kind-of-conservative,
THere are plenty of wack jobs to keep both sides looking insane and inane.
The funny thing is we’re still sitting here yelling at each other, and many of you believe the other side has a monopoly on ad hominem attacks…and you’re both right. Ann Coulter may have some interesting things to say, but she’s a bombthrower, and that does service to no one.
Then, we have liberals so angry by what she said they’re calling Ann Coulter all sorts of not-so-nice things. Honestly, I sit here shaking my head by the insults thrown by both sides. As long as we sit here spewing hatred, the Wizards in Washington will never have to worry about any of us looking behind the curtain.
I don’t know if a 3rd party is the answer, but something needs to change in this country, and quick.
June 7th, 2006 at 12:59 pmPost 445 > the one profiting from 9/11 is Ann Coulter by smearing widows whose husbands died in the WTC towers
Comment by Jay Randal — June 7, 2006 @ 2:16 am
Ain’t it the truth.
Or do you right wing Coulter playthings in here think she is donating the profits of her new book to charity?
She’s making money, bashing victims, proclaiming death and murder to further the sale of her book and the right slurps it up.
Coulter is a cheep bible thumping snake oil salesmen, and you guys buy it hook, line and sinker.
June 7th, 2006 at 1:42 pmCoulter is a cheep bible thumping snake oil salesmen, and you guys buy it hook, line and sinker.
Comment by FLAVIUS WORFEUS
And what, praytell, do you buy hook, line and sinker?
June 7th, 2006 at 1:47 pmComent 481: Erik, you are right on the money! However, the 3rd pary concept was tried back in ‘92 when Ross Perot ran, then dropped out, then jumped back in and still received 18 percent of the vote. Everyone in my middle class neighborhood was going to vote for him including my wife and I, but when he dropped out, (and then jumped back in)we ended up voting for Clinton, as we perceived Perot as flaky. Perot’s assertions that people disrupted his daughter’s wedding and fired off automatic weapons outside his home only reinforced our thinking that Perot had gone off the deep end. In retospect however, I think he was telling the truth. I firmly believe powerful entities “persuded” Perot to drop out, then once his reputation as a kook was established, either agreed to let him back in the race, or merely ignored him after that, as these entities knew his reputaion was permanently sullied. I believe in my heart of hearts that these entities were shocked to see the number of voters Perot was attracting, and it scared them to think the people of the U.S. might discover they really did have power if united behind one candidate. Well, the rest is history and as a people we plod along divided, weak and ineffective. We had our chance and we blew it; this is why Nader keeps running; he doesn’t want the presidency, he wants people to know they have a choice, but they refuse to see. Too scary I guess, to actually have a hand in your nation’s destiny; just leave it to the politicians, that’s why we elect them, they know what to do, they represent us… Yeah, right…
June 7th, 2006 at 1:55 pmHonestly I have voted Republican a majority of the time, although I did vote for Patrick D. Moynahan as a NY Senator because I thought he was a true intellectual…and I did vote for Perot in ‘92.
We need a VIABLE 3rd party, and Nader/Perot/Buchanan aren’t that.
June 7th, 2006 at 1:58 pmWell Erik, a 3rd party has to start somewhere, and Perot might have been it; he had the right idea about “townhalls”, and it might have worked especially given that internet access was right around the corner. One more thing, Republicans are more consistent voters than Democrats, they vote for local issues more regularly, and tend to vote straight ticket(other than your vote for Moynahan). This gives them more power overall, a lesson the Democrats could surely learn…
June 7th, 2006 at 2:18 pmAnn is absolutely awesome. She speaks the truth and those of you who bash her do so because “you can’t handle the truth.” Close minded bigots come from left leaning liberals not conservatives. Those of you who bad-mouth Christianity, morality, setting rules and following them, and try to make those of us who live for something other than ourselves, are the real threat to America, the human race, and you will pay when the Lord returns. You can deny hell exists but that doesn’t change the fact that it does and you are headed for it. Go ahead and live your life for now, because you will have a long time to pay for your narrow minded, ignorant ways.
June 7th, 2006 at 2:19 pmErik, if you want something to change in this country, you can start by voting Democrat. You are contradicting yourself by complaining about the status quo while continuing to vote Republican!
June 7th, 2006 at 2:30 pmDaniel…the war in Iraq is immoral and so are you for supporting it. Both you and Ann will go to hell when you die, because the Lord does not approve of your hatred and immorality.
June 7th, 2006 at 2:35 pmDaniel — seek therapy immediately.
June 7th, 2006 at 2:37 pmDaniel learn your bible; Christ descended into hell for 3 days; hell is death, non-living; Hades is where bad people like you go… You must be in one of those churches that picks and chooses which parts of the bible fit their dogma then shun the rest… and you are really a good Christian in judging others; you probably cheat on your taxes and believe in the rapture as well…
June 7th, 2006 at 3:03 pm“Ann is absolutely awesome.”
If you like crap.
June 7th, 2006 at 3:23 pmLet’s not get sidetracked from the laughability or implications of the garbage Ann has been spewing by calling her a trannie and accusing her of having a sex change–besides, the comparison is insulting to any transvestite out there.
June 7th, 2006 at 3:28 pmWho said he had a sex change?
June 7th, 2006 at 3:34 pmHonestly, most of the Democratic platform doesn’t appeal to me…and 40 years of Democrats ruling Congress was as mediocre as 12 recent ones with the Republicans. It seems the vocal minorities of both parties are running the show, and it leaves a lot of us in between scratching our heads. Honestly, it seems our political parties are two sides of the same coin. We need a new coin.
June 7th, 2006 at 3:36 pmEric…Granted there are some similarities between the two parties. But do you honestly think that President Gore would have gone into Iraq? That, in and of itself, is a huge difference.
June 7th, 2006 at 3:42 pminre 495: Yeah, like Championship Wrestling! A lot of bluster but no substance, then after the big rumble, retire to the bar to toss back a few drinks together
June 7th, 2006 at 3:43 pmI agree that calling Coulter names is counter-productive. Lets focus instead on what she said. To say that “I have never seen people enjoying their husbands’ death so much” is disgusting on every level. It is an insult to anyone who has ever lost a spouse.
June 7th, 2006 at 3:49 pmWhat to do with Ms. Ann Coulter? Like other right-wing hate-media stars, she’s clearly all about character assassination and out-of-context cherry-picked facts and quotes. These media hacks don’t want debate, they want to grab attention. They deal with smears, they know innuendo and hate, that’s what they do. They are the stars of political hackery.
The Left has its own, but they don’t do as good a job, because their heart is less into it, in general, being more concerned with “fairness†and “community”, concepts that don’t lend themselves well to targeted assassinations of political opponents. The Right does it better, understanding power better, going for the gut better. It’s the difference between the Gore campaign and the Bush mafia in Florida.
This silly argument about the widows is just typical. Coulter is obviously over-the-top rude and hypocritical, spouting false or misleading facts and impressing vast segments of Middle America with her quick (though shallow) tongue and her physique.
Politics is full of hypocritical cant on both sides of the political divide, it’s just that Coulter and her fellow travellers take it to the extreme, and then have the constant gall to accuse more reasonable people of the craziness that she’s the master of. They’re masters of hackery. Don’t try to compete.
Let her speak, often. Let her on all the media outlets, but pin her, make her explain her b.s.–don’t just let her make wild statements unburdened by a reality check, because then the stupid amongst us will take her as Gospel. She sure sounds confident, like any jerk in a bar on a Saturday night, and she’s attractive to some for her quick tongue and her cleavage, and the worst thing anyone could do is to limit her exposure.
The fault is not with Ann–if she keeled over tomorrow there would be 10 more like her, spawn from the same dark place of fear. The fault, really, is with our expectations of journalists and interviewers. We need to make sure they start to do as Matt L. did a bit: repeat her words back to her and have her explain them. Let her rant ’til the cows come home, but hold her to the truth of her statements, and she’ll shrivel in the light of day.
June 7th, 2006 at 3:49 pmI agree that calling Coulter names is counter-productive. Lets focus instead on what she said. To say that “I have never seen people enjoying their husbands’ death so much” is disgusting on every level. It is an insult to anyone who has ever lost a spouse. Shame on you Ann!
June 7th, 2006 at 3:49 pmAnd what, praytell, do you buy hook, line and sinker?
Comment by Erik — June 7, 2006 @ 1:47 pm
What do I buy?
I buy that Ann Coulter is a cheep snake oil salesman and you guys, her obvious devoted minions, suck it up like a cheap canned wine.
THATS what I buy.
June 7th, 2006 at 3:54 pmIn her new book, Coulter says Jews are Christians.
Yea, thats a real peice of “scholary” work she put out there, LMFAO.
June 7th, 2006 at 3:59 pmFor Truth, about the “Coulter for 2008″ bumpersticker? LOL. Hammitt, your facts about the “tinker’s dam” was most interestin”. I just like the way it sounds…
As for Ms. Coulter, I recall her interview on Alex Jones’ show July 10th of 2003 (I’m pretty sure I got the year right). Not only did Alex mop the floor with her, I was appalled by her ignorance, either feigned or real. She displayed a woeful lack of knowledge of DOCUMENTED history about Northwoods, Bush family ties to Nazis during WWII, Selective bombing in Germany, Alternative Energy, the so-called “Patriot Act” (which she claimed to be knowledgeable about), the Second Amendment, etc., etc… She talks about “The Left” and “The Right”. The Latter = Yet More Japanese Kabuki theater, more Punch and Judy, more WWF Phoniness. I’d rather concentrate on how the Congresscritters, Pollyticians and Bureaucrats have URINATED all over our heritage and Founding Documents. I’m for REAL representatives like Ron Paul… He is a true Constitutionalist. Where have all the REAL Patriots gone to?
And WE are to blame because these CRIMINALS (”Left”, “Right”, “Liberal” or “Conservative”) have PILLAGED our Country while we have SLEPT.
As for the official story of 9/11, the premise of an early episode of Sponge Bob Square Pants has more feasibility than the Fairy Tale sold by Faux News, Limbaugh and their Ilk.
Coulter is a not-so-cheap whore for the Globalists and their Neo-Con operatives. She is entitled to her opinion and she has a right to Hawk her latest book. But for her to attempt to palm herself off as a real authority on the seminal events of our time ???
Give me a break…
She HAS sold her soul to the highest bidder. In fact, I question whether she even HAS a soul… In fact, I can’t, frankly, even imagine LIVING her pathetic, sh*tty life for one day…
The Democrats sure as Hell aren’t going to save the day and the Republicans have shown themselves to be ANYTHING but the Vanguards of Liberty they so boldly claim to be.
We had better Wake the F**k Up. Fast. Or all is Lost.
P.S. Coulter is living proof of the saying “It’s better to be thought of as a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubts”.
June 7th, 2006 at 4:03 pmAnd what, praytell, do you buy hook, line and sinker?
Comment by Erik — June 7, 2006 @ 1:47 pm
What do I buy?
I buy that Ann Coulter is a cheep snake oil salesman and you guys, her obvious devoted minions, suck it up like a cheap canned wine.
THATS what I buy.
Comment by FLAVIUS `WORFEUS
All I asked was a simple question, and all you have left in your ammo bin is by trying to label me a devoted minion of Ann Coulter. Good one. Way to raise the dialogue.
It seems, based on your comments, what you do buy into is that by labeling people it somehow serves to sooth your ego.
June 7th, 2006 at 4:05 pmAwww
Sounds like someones upset.
Wazza matter Erick?
Truth hurt?
June 7th, 2006 at 4:17 pmCause you know, that one paragraph in her book, the only one I’ve seen so far, is gonna make her th laughing stock of the religious community, at least the educated half.
She includes Jews with Christians, LMFAO.
June 7th, 2006 at 4:19 pmYou can’t make stuff like this up, lol.
This stuff sells itself.
June 7th, 2006 at 4:20 pmNext time you see your headmistress, tell her she should stick to writing about things she knows, like how to skin a deer with a can opener, and what type of cleaning rag to use on her small bore.
June 7th, 2006 at 4:21 pmAwww
Sounds like someones upset.
Wazza matter Erick?
Truth hurt?
Comment by FLAVIUS `WORFEUS
No, it doesn’t hurt at all. Kind of sad, actually. I guess you just don’t get it.
I have heard the phrase Judeo-Christian, however.
June 7th, 2006 at 4:23 pmFlavius,
How old are you?
June 7th, 2006 at 4:24 pmI have heard the phrase Judeo-Christian, however.
Comment by Erik — June 7, 2006 @ 4:23 pm
LOL, stop Erik, you’re killin me
June 7th, 2006 at 4:24 pmFlavius,
How old are you?
Comment by Erik — June 7, 2006 @ 4:24 pm
Oh didn’t I tell you?
June 7th, 2006 at 4:26 pmWhat I really enjoyed was how Ann kept responding to questions with “I don’t know.”
The poorest display of wonk I’ve ever seen.
June 7th, 2006 at 4:43 pmThis is going to be wildly unpopular but I went back and read what she (Coulter) had to say and honestly, while she could have delivered the message better I don’t necessarily disagree with her.
“These self-obsessed women seem genuinely unaware that 9-11 was an attack on our nation and acted like as if the terrorist attack only happened to them. They believe the entire country was required to marinate in their exquisite personal agony. Apparently, denouncing bush was part of the closure process.”
I’ve said before that New Yorkers tend to think the world revolves around them. And while they did take a direct hit on 9/11 they were not the only ones affected (directly or indirectly) yet they are by far and away the “squeakiest” group. So much so that when 9/11 is brought up, New York immediately comes to mind and it takes a few moments of reflection before you remember The Pentagon and all the airline passengers and their loved ones that took a direct hit. If your not from New York your grief is almost dismissed as being lesser in intensity.
“These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by griefparrazies. I have never seen people enjoying their husband’s death so much.”
The above statement would seem to be way over the top and incredibly harsh but, much like Cindy Sheehan, these “broads” are getting their 15 minutes of fame due to unfortunate circumstances. I think they may have started out with the best of intentions but after a few dinner parties with famous celebrities, invites to appear on national TV, speaking engagements in front of adoring persons and meetings with heads of state the intent quickly becomes twisted into a bastardized, self-cathartic characature of what they originally set out to do. I think that saying they are enjoying their husband’s deaths too much is incorrect but they certainly are gaining from it, both psychologically and monetarily.
June 7th, 2006 at 4:43 pm15 Minutes claim to fame?
Is that what you think watching your husband join hands with 2 other office workers and leap from the 90th floor of a burning building?
A claim to fame?
June 7th, 2006 at 4:47 pmWell at least you named yourself correctly, Herr Scat.
June 7th, 2006 at 4:48 pmI have always thought that Ann Coulter gets her greatest satisfaction in life by making liberals uncontrollably regress into writhing fits and convulsions. True, she likely gets a charge from her primary target audience but it’s the thought of her secondary market that makes her tick.
I’m certain that if she were to read this site bearing witness to the countless requests for her death, dismemberment, or just expulsion to desert islands that she would feel a deeply warm and soothing sense of satisfaction. You can actually see the vain pulsing in the forehead of this website. Just the sight of her, as evidenced by the majority of the people who posted here, sends most of this audience into a desperate rage of spitting hatred. I just found this to be an interesting social observation.
Oh, and the thought of the impact on liberals from her book vying for the best seller of the year probably makes her giggle herself to sleep at night.
June 7th, 2006 at 4:59 pmI have always thought that Ann Coulter gets her greatest satisfaction in life by making liberals uncontrollably regress into writhing fits and convulsions
Comment by PointMan — June 7, 2006 @ 4:59 pm
Oh yea, we’re just all broken up over Coulter publishing a book that makes her look like a fool, LMFAO.
June 7th, 2006 at 5:07 pmIts not like we’re trying to make her look stupid or anything.
She doesn’t need our help, LOL.
June 7th, 2006 at 5:08 pm15 Minutes claim to fame?
Is that what you think watching your husband join hands with 2 other office workers and leap from the 90th floor of a burning building?
A claim to fame?
Not at all what I would think. As I mentioned in my first post, a claim to fame was not what they intended but human nature starts to kick in at some point. Your actions start to speak for themselves and when one starts accepting certain accolades and gifts that come with “celebrity” you have to start wondering about motive and intent. Telling their story to others and getting national recognition gives them a sense of importance and self-worth that they would not have otherwise felt if not for this great tragedy. Much like a person that has been physically injured gains something from capturing the attention of a room full of people by showing them their scars and talking about the incident. In no way will it replace their loved ones but may help blunt the pain.
I’m not trying to lessen their loss but they have gained something from their loss regardless and they are using it to their advantage both politiacally and personally.
June 7th, 2006 at 5:10 pmAnn Coulter is on the same level as a child predator. She preys on the right wing in an effort to line her pockets. She has no morals and can only be stopped by a Dateline sting.
June 7th, 2006 at 5:12 pmYour actions start to speak for themselves and when one starts accepting certain accolades and gifts that come with “celebrity†you have to start wondering about motive and intent.
Comment by Scat — June 7, 2006 @ 5:10 pm
What “celebrity” are you referring to? Are the Papparazzi chasing them? Do they have to sign autographs and wear dark glasses?
Are they wining and dining at the White House or at any of the Hollywood parties?
Maybe they’ll host the Oscars this year?
June 7th, 2006 at 5:21 pmIf you think giving up your comfy home, travelling around in vans and busses, sleeping in tents, hotels, lawn chairs, eating on paper plates and living out of suitcases is “the high life” , then boy do I have a gig for you.
June 7th, 2006 at 5:24 pmLike I said, at least you named yourself correctly.
June 7th, 2006 at 5:30 pmBut I will tell you, SCAT, what I told her other subservient gnome.
The next time you see your headmistress, tell her to stick to writing about things of which she has some expertise.
Like how to root a boll weevil out from under a sunken double-wide using basic household chemicals, or 5 easy ways to get axle grease out of a polyester blouse.
June 7th, 2006 at 5:38 pmYou know, I’m from Cranbury. You can’t walk into the local post office without knowing WHO it was dedicated to, regardless of how “nondescript” the powers that be were attempting to be, in honor of Lisa Beamer’s request to not alter the appearance of the post office dedicated to her husband Todd. And truthfully, the man WAS a hero, he deserves it. I should have been at the breakfast at Windows on the World on 9/11. Thanks to my bosses refusal to pay 400 bucks for a networking breakfast, I am here. And every day, I have some degree of survivor guilt. It took me 3 years to throw out the damn ecru colored invitation to that breakfast. My brother, an officer, did a 24 hour bucket brigade at Ground Zero as a volunteer. They are NOT the only ones affected. Granted, these women did not ask to be widows, just as the nation did not ask for 3000+ people to get up, go to work, and never come home, but after spending hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars to answer WHY their husbands died ala 9/11 Commission, are we any safer? Nope. And, we’ve accorded those directly affected by 9/11 a certain amount of respectful deference because of the fact that they are either widows or widowers of 9/11. That doesn’t mean that they have anything valuable to add or contribute. It means their marital status changed, they suffered a horrible loss, and quite frankly, if one is willing to use their marital status to promote a political agenda (go ahead, stump for Kerry girls) they had best be willing to take the shots that come as part of entering the political arena. They used their status to promote their agenda, what’s to stop Coulter from using their status to promote HER agenda? Or anyone else? Why not? We gave them a platform. Works both ways. You want to become a political animal, you are subject to the rest of them in the ring. I’ve met Lisa Beamer. She’s taken her grief and used it positively to change the lives of future generations of children in her husband’s memory through the Todd Beamer Foundation. She’s affecting the future positively. It seems that the Jersey Girls are just screeching blame, not looking to aid in the fixing. Quite a contrast. And I wonder why no other 9/11 survivors, widowers, widows, have come out in support of the 4. While I detest the way Ann Coulter did it, I am reminded that either be part of the solution, or part of the problem. Coulter is neither, and is quite a fool, but then again, have these 4 made the world any better? Not really. Where was their vigilance before 9/11? If it hadn’t happened, would they STILL be going about their day as housewives of millionaires? Probably. Think about it. Coulter is horribly blunt, but perhaps these women need to know that there ARE those that don’t agree and they might NOT be speaking for all of us.
June 7th, 2006 at 5:49 pmWhat “celebrity†are you referring to? Are the Papparazzi chasing them? Do they have to sign autographs and wear dark glasses?
Are they wining and dining at the White House or at any of the Hollywood parties?
Maybe they’ll host the Oscars this year?
Your definition of celebrity is too narrow. Celebrity – 1: a widely known person; “he was a baseball celebrity” [syn: famous person] 2: the state or quality of being widely honored and acclaimed. As you can see, the word celebrity does not sepcifically mean wearing dark glasses and signing autographs.
With that said, let’s see… being invited to Knicks’ games and being wildly cheered by the crowd at halftime. Being invited to Good Morning America. Being interviewed by major media outlets (NY Times, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, FOX, Washington Post, yada, yada, yada) where millions will read your story. In Cindy Sheehan’s case, yes, she has spent time with many of Hollywood’s elite; Tim Robbins, Susan Sarandon, Martin Sheen & Michael Moore to name but just a few. These are just a few examples I found by running a Google search. It would not surprise me at all if a number of the 9/11 spouses had also met with some of Hollywood’s elite.
As I said before, I’m not trying to denigrate their loss or the overall tragedy but to deny that there was some truth to what Coulter said is to simply be obtuse. She certainly could have used less harsh language but she had a point.
June 7th, 2006 at 5:50 pm9/11 Widows respond to Coulter
Statement of September 11th Advocates Response to “Godless”
MUST READ
June 7th, 2006 at 5:51 pmCoulter Fall Out
I think the tide is turning against her finally. The article I posted yesterday has had hundreds of thousands of downloads. She’ll always have a home on FOX, but more and more conservatives pundits and bloggers are turning on her. I’m glad to be helping in that cause. The more she appears promoting her new book, the faster she will fall.
SEVERAL LIKS HERE
June 7th, 2006 at 5:54 pmA sluty preying mantis
June 7th, 2006 at 5:54 pmAww, look at the little gnomes, serving their mistress.
Gotta keep plugging away boys.
You’ll think of something smart to say eventually.
June 7th, 2006 at 5:54 pmMaybe if you guys put your heads together.
Try knocking them together too. That might help.
June 7th, 2006 at 5:56 pmSee a tongue-in-cheek visual depicting the new “war on Ann Coulter”…here:
http://www.thoughttheater.com
June 7th, 2006 at 5:59 pmOh don’t worry Katy.
Coulter made one big mistake.
She decided to talk about religion.
She decided to talk about it and she banked on her brain actually being able to come up with something intelligent to say about it, without actually having to know anything about it.
I’ve only seen one paragraph of her book so far, and already she’s put her foot right in her big fat mouth, and made herself look like what she is. A backwoods hillbilly who can read and write just enough to make a fool of herself.
June 7th, 2006 at 6:00 pmFLAVIUS,
You’re coming across as a troll. And it doesn’t seem you’ve added much to the debate besides name calling.
June 7th, 2006 at 6:03 pmLOL, oh I’m sorry Erik, did I break your concentration?
June 7th, 2006 at 6:07 pmIts not my fault you can’t think of anything witty to say to impress your headmistress with so she’ll let you hang out in the dungeon for an extra hour or two.
Thats what happens when you get upset slim. Your wittle repugnican brain just sorta, shuts down.
Don’t worry, its quite common with you guys.
June 7th, 2006 at 6:12 pmwell, what I think wil be MORE interesting now, is who is going to be jumping up and down on Coulter’s back for her comments. Surprise surprise surprise Hillary Clinton (you know, wife of do nothing Bill) is ALLLLL over her. Bashes Coulter AND looks good to the constituants AND distances herself from ooppps “Somalia happened” Bubba. I thinks I sees me a presidential candidate in the gestational stages…Heck, this should result in quite an interesting aftermath, don’t you think?
June 7th, 2006 at 6:13 pmErik’s concentraion seems to be fine. He recognized what you’re about easily enough.
June 7th, 2006 at 6:13 pmTwo words: MEDIA WHORE
June 7th, 2006 at 6:22 pmYou know, its hard to type with soda squirting out of your nose, but you guys are too damned funny.
Listen to you guys cry like a couple of little sissies.
You sure like to come in here and dish it out though, don’t you?
In here shooting your mouths off about women who lost their husbands in violent deaths but ohhh, stop Worfeus, you’re hurting us….oh……stop it…….ow.
You guys slay me.
June 7th, 2006 at 6:24 pmTell your headmistress she did a good job in whoopin you two girls.
Thanks to her tutilege you’re gonna make someone a couple of fine wives someday.
June 7th, 2006 at 6:28 pmWhew, some of you guys obviously don’t have jobs… Anyway –
Wonderful, heartfelt bullshit. Typical liberal: throw invectives and then complain about mudslinging. If I have to pick one word to describe today’s liberals, that word is SHAMELESS. Yuck. Brrrbbrb. Ech. What crap.
June 7th, 2006 at 6:33 pmNice post!
——
http://www.htlounge.net
News: Gadgets, High Tech, Automobiles, Software, Games, Players, Phones, Multimedia …
http://www.softdatabase.net
June 7th, 2006 at 6:35 pm10.000 Free software downloads: Freeware and Shareware
Whew, some of you guys obviously don’t have jobs
Comment by trillium — June 7, 2006 @ 6:33 pm
Hmm, I can’t help but notice you’re in here most of the time. ANYWAY……
June 7th, 2006 at 6:36 pmIf I have to pick one word to describe today’s liberals, that word is SHAMELESS. Yuck. Brrrbbrb. Ech. What crap.
Comment by trillium — June 7, 2006 @ 6:33 pm
Actually that was 3 words. Brrrbbrb and Ech don’t qualify as words, even as slang, though they could pass for baby-talk.
June 7th, 2006 at 6:39 pmI wrote that before your correction to the search string. But instead of “I made a mistake, sorry” you’re blaming me. Nice. Katty. Very nice.
June 7th, 2006 at 6:39 pmTypical liberal: throw invectives and then complain about mudslinging.
Comment by sillium — June 7, 2006 @ 6:33 pm
You mean like Erik and vc just did above?
June 7th, 2006 at 6:41 pm(whhirrr… click) You know how I know you’re gay? ‘Cause you can tell who’s gay; you have a freaking… gaydar, yeah!
Why do we talk about her looks? If she really was a man looks wouldn’t come up in discussion. (I.e. haven’t heard “Bush is not only stupid but ugly”. But with you idiots maybe I should check the archives, who knows.)
June 7th, 2006 at 6:49 pmEric…Granted there are some similarities between the two parties. But do you honestly think that President Gore would have gone into Iraq? That, in and of itself, is a huge difference.
Comment by Larry
Well Larry,
It’s hard to guess exactly what Gore would have done post 9/11, so who knows. I don’t think you can make a definitive statement either way on that.
I do know that the Republicans are spending just as freely as the Democrats did, so they seem to love pork equally. Who ever thought a Republican would have come up with one of the biggest entitlement packages (Bush and prescription drugs) and a Democrat would have pushed welfare reform (Clinton).
June 7th, 2006 at 6:50 pm(whhirrr… click) You know how I know you’re gay? ‘Cause you can tell who’s gay; you have a freaking… gaydar, yeah!
Comment by trillium — June 7, 2006 @ 6:49 pm
Was that supposed to be witty?
Maybe you’d better stick to crying about me pickin on you.
June 7th, 2006 at 6:52 pmYou sycophant weenie liberals are pathetic.
June 7th, 2006 at 6:53 pmAnn is great.
I don’t think it’s slinging, and I’m not complaining about the slinging I do see. I just hope to see a few intelligent points raised in a debate, but with the name calling and profanity, it’s getting kinda hard.
Somalia DID happen, and he DID nothing(left my cousin there the bastard did), and NOW good ol Hillary will most likely make a run for it. Sure seems to me like Jersey girls are shoving their agenda down the throats of the masses and hiding behind a widow mantle to do it. (Sorry, those that are millionaires and do not need to work for a living do NOT speak for those that do and are not and suffered just the same), now we’re bashing AC for using their status to promote HER agenda, and NOW good ol Hillary is gonna use the free publicity and Ann’s boo-boos to promote HER agenda. Fascinating crap we weave, I think it’s both sad and a riot. And it REALLY pisses me off that in the 5 years since, it’s like it never happened at all. And were it not for the name calling and profanity, I’d be thinking a lot more of your posts Flavius…you might have some good points to make, but they seem lost behind personal attacks.
June 7th, 2006 at 6:54 pmI do know that the Republicans are spending just as freely as the Democrats did, so they seem to love pork equally
Comment by Erik — June 7, 2006 @ 6:50 pm
Well when we got done, we had a few hundred billion in surplus, so apparently you’re not just grammatically challenged, you can count either.
June 7th, 2006 at 6:55 pmYes, that’s TYPICAL liberal. (I.e. “liberals do this a lot, more than others”.) After while however weapons must be matched — the best defense against a tank is another tank.
June 7th, 2006 at 6:56 pmyou’re not just grammatically challenged, you can count either
Speaking of grammar — I suggest one shall make up one’s mind regarding where this is going: choose one only of either “you can’T count either”, or, alternatively, “you can count TOO”.
June 7th, 2006 at 7:02 pmLove you!
(Pssst! Let’s see if the Grammar Nazi brings me up on irony charges ;-)
June 7th, 2006 at 7:07 pmI’d be thinking a lot more of your posts Flavius…you might have some good points to make, but they seem lost behind personal attacks.
Comment by vc — June 7, 2006 @ 6:54 pm
Ok, lemme see if I’ve got this straight.
You’re saying you think less of my posts because you feel they involve personal attacks, while you’re in here defending a woman who makes her living off of personal attacks.
Outstanding.
June 7th, 2006 at 7:08 pmSpeaking of grammar — I suggest one shall make up one’s mind regarding where this is going: choose one only of either “you can’T count eitherâ€, or, alternatively, “you can count TOOâ€.
Comment by trillium — June 7, 2006 @ 7:02 pm
I’m sorry, but was that supposed to be some sort of sentence?
June 7th, 2006 at 7:10 pmAnd BTW Sillium, the phrase, “And you can’t count either” is correct english.
Don’t try to sound academic, until you’ve polished your own writing skills a little more.
I’d start with Hooked-on-Phonics and work my way up from there.
June 7th, 2006 at 7:15 pmWas supposed to be stupid, like Sptupid Boy’s comment it responded to. Anyway, is there a level of debate quality that must be maintained? ‘Cause I haven’t noticed.
June 7th, 2006 at 7:17 pma horse goes in a bar. the bartender says “why the long face?” ann coulter goes in a bar . . .
she is a good example of why free speech is so important. her own words expose her lack of substance and arrogant stupidity. here we find the best example of the prototypical Ugly American. but because there are so many of them around, her books always will do well.
still, if you like the skinny ones…
June 7th, 2006 at 7:20 pmBut hey, lets all watch Ann get her clock cleaned by Lou Dobbs tomorrow night.
I don’t think old Lou is gonna be too happy with her tomorrow, considering she’s on to discuss calling the widows of 911 victims, “witches” in her new book.
Witches.
Yea VC, thats one real class act you’re defending there.
One class act.
June 7th, 2006 at 7:20 pmOk FLAVIUS, if you’re going to get technical, there was a surplus with Clinton, and there will be with Bush (projected by the GAO, IIRC). And tax revenues doubled under Reagan, BFD. Your comment obfuscates rather than clarifies since neither side will cut spending. Once the dot com bubble burst, so did the “surplus.”
June 7th, 2006 at 7:21 pmOk FLAVIUS, if you’re going to get technical, there was a surplus with Clinton, and there will be with Bush (projected by the GAO, IIRC). And tax revenues doubled under Reagan, BFD. Your comment obfuscates rather than clarifies since neither side will cut spending. Once the dot com bubble burst, so did the “surplus.”
Stop making this a he said/she said kind of debate. It reduces the level of discourse down to that of a 6 year old.
June 7th, 2006 at 7:22 pmOr ass act.
June 7th, 2006 at 7:22 pmOk FLAVIUS, if you’re going to get technical, there was a surplus with Clinton, and there will be with Bush
Comment by Erik — June 7, 2006 @ 7:21 pm
Stop Erik, you’re killin me.
June 7th, 2006 at 7:24 pmStop making this a he said/she said kind of debate. It reduces the level of discourse down to that of a 6 year old.
Comment by Erik — June 7, 2006 @ 7:22 pm
You mean stop posting the dumbass comments you keep making?
Yea, I guess that could make you look dumb, huh?
June 7th, 2006 at 7:25 pmBTW Erik,
Next time you cut and paste from your word processor, so you don’t make half a dozen spelling errors per post, don’t copy the previous comment.
It makes you look stupid.
June 7th, 2006 at 7:27 pmSure it is. I wrote it correcting one of your rants –
What makes this pathetic, class, is that in the very same sentence where Mr. Whorefeus petulantly corrects a colleague of ours, he himself screws the grammar up!
June 7th, 2006 at 7:28 pmAnn-thrax Coulter defenders, please read the following:/
11 Widows, New York Papers, Respond to Coulter’s ‘Slander’
Ann Coulter
By E&P Staff
Published: June 07, 2006 7:55 AM ET updated 10:00 AM ET
NEW YORK Syndicated columnist and author Ann Coulter appeared on the Today show on Tuesday, promoting a new book. Host Matt Lauer asked her to explain certain remarks in the book aimed at activist 9/11 widows, including her charge that they were nothing but “self obsessed” and celebrity-seeking “broads” who are “enjoying” their husbands’ deaths “so much.”
After she defended these statements, he closed by saying, “always fun to have you here.”
Elsewhere in the book, Coulter refers to the widows as “witches” and asks, “how do we know their husbands weren’t planning to divorce these harpies”?
In response, a group of five 9/11 widows, who may have been the prime targets of Coulter’s remarks, issued a statement denouncing Coulter’s views. The New York Daily News on Wednesday featured a smiling Coulter and this headline on its front page: COULTER THE CRUEL. One story inside was topped with “Massive Chip on Her Coulter ” and another called her a “a model of meanness.”
The Star-Ledger in Newark, meanwhile, carried a story today with the headline “For 9/11 widows, book adds insult to injury.” It featured interviews with some of the widows. The New York Post headlined a story: “RIGHTY WRITER COULTER HURLS NASTY GIBES AT 9/11 GALS.”
The Post interviewed one of the widows, Mindy Kleinberg of East Brunswick, N.J. — part of a group Coulter dubbed “The Witches of East Brunswick.” Kleinberg said, “We are trying to make sure that nobody else walks in our footsteps. And if she [Coulter] thinks that’s wrong, so be it.” Newsday (Melville, N.Y.) carried an Associated Press story.
Universal syndicates Coulter’s column. A spokesman there told E&P it had no response to the latest firestorm.
The five widows’ statement is reprinted below (it first appeared at crooksandliars.com).
***
We did not choose to become widowed on September 11, 2001. The attack, which tore our families apart and destroyed our former lives, caused us to ask some serious questions regarding the systems that our country has in place to protect its citizens.
Through our constant research, we came to learn how the protocols were supposed to have worked. Thus, we asked for an independent commission to investigate the loopholes which obviously existed and allowed us to be so utterly vulnerable to terrorists. Our only motivation ever was to make our Nation safer. Could we learn from this tragedy so that it would not be repeated?
We are forced to respond to Ms. Coulter’s accusations to set the record straight because we have been slandered.
Contrary to Ms. Coulter’s statements, there was no joy in watching men that we loved burn alive. There was no happiness in telling our children that their fathers were never coming home again. We adored these men and miss them every day.
It is in their honor and memory, that we will once again refocus the Nation’s attention to the real issues at hand: our lack of security, leadership and progress in the five years since 9/11.
We are continuously reminded that we are still a nation at risk. Therefore, the following is a partial list of areas still desperately in need of attention and public outcry. We should continuously be holding the feet of our elected officials to the fire to fix these shortcomings.
1. Homeland Security Funding based on risk. Inattention to this area causes police officers, firefighters and other emergency/first responder personnel to be ill equipped in emergencies. Fixing this will save lives on the day of the next attack.
2. Intelligence Community Oversight. Without proper oversight, there exists no one joint, bicameral intelligence panel with power to both authorize and appropriate funding for intelligence activities. Without such funding we are unable to capitalize on all intelligence community resources and abilities to thwart potential terrorist attacks. Fixing this will save lives on the day of the next attack.
3. Transportation Security. There has been no concerted effort to harden mass transportation security. Our planes, buses, subways, and railways remain under-protected and highly vulnerable. These are all identifiable soft targets of potential terrorist attack. The terror attacks in Spain and London attest to this fact. Fixing our transportation systems may save lives on the day of the next attack.
4. Information Sharing among Intelligence Agencies. Information sharing among intelligence agencies has not improved since 9/11. The attacks on 9/11 could have been prevented had information been shared among intelligence agencies. On the day of the next attack, more lives may be saved if our intelligence agencies work together.
5. Loose Nukes. A concerted effort has not been made to secure the thousands of loose nukes scattered around the world – particularly in the former Soviet Union. Securing these loose nukes could make it less likely for a terrorist group to use this method in an attack, thereby saving lives.
6. Security at Chemical Plants, Nuclear Plants, Ports. We must, as a nation, secure these known and identifiable soft targets of Terrorism. Doing so will save many lives.
7. Border Security. We continue to have porous borders and INS and Customs systems in shambles. We need a concerted effort to integrate our border security into the larger national security apparatus.
8. Civil Liberties Oversight Board. Given the President’s NSA Surveillance Program and the re-instatement of the Patriot Act, this Nation is in dire need of a Civil Liberties Oversight Board to insure that a proper balance is found between national security versus the protection of our constitutional rights.
– September 11th Advocates
Kristen Breitweiser
June 7th, 2006 at 7:31 pmPatty Casazza
Monica Gabrielle
Mindy Kleinberg
Lorie Van Auken
Oh, you mean the Typo?
That’s what you’re coming at me with?
Oh ok dude.
Good catch. Point to you man.
June 7th, 2006 at 7:31 pmI do not agree with Coulter’s comments however I believe that not all of the 9/11 families (not just widows) are as greedy and attention-grabbing as perhaps a nauseating few are. They have every right to grieve, but should not expect anything else from anyone else. We all have lost loved ones and we grieve privately, not expecting any money, attention, or the entire nation to ‘remember’ our loved ones forever! Yes, 9/11 was an attack on our nation, not a personal attack on their loved ones, they (the few greedy ones it seems) need to stop expecting too much. They give the majority of 9/11 families a bad rep. and most of them are good people no doubt. Nothing ‘political’ here, just my take on the families. Sugar
June 7th, 2006 at 7:31 pmWhen will the freaky conservative whore ever learn.? Answer: never. She is getting just what she wants, and the stupid media are giving it to her. God, she’s not even a good writer, and as a thinker, she is nothing but an ad hominum machine gone beserk. I love to see her say the things she said on the Today Show to some of the children of men or women who perished in the 9/11 attackes. I’d love to see her in a little debate with Kristen Breitweiser, who would clean her clock. Ann Coulter is not smart, only vile. Is not original, only a purveyor of canards.
Coulter’s logic would not pass muster in a freshman course on creative thinking, but she gives the conservative garbage the red meat they crave. It is with great hope that I look forward to the day whent she suffers even a small part of the very suffering she so blithely dismisses. If there ever was a harpy, she is it . A face like a horse, humorless, condescending, a boor, and with a dearth of empathy, Coulter is indeed the poster girl for all the whackos who need her on the wall. Shame on NBC, MSNBC and Drudge for giving this piece of s*** a forum. It worked — her new book is near the top on Amazon.com
June 7th, 2006 at 7:35 pmHoney. You got your panties up in a knot cause she STANDS OUT. If there were “so many” of her around (I wish) she would BLEND IN instead.
June 7th, 2006 at 7:35 pm547. I don’t get it. Comment by trillium — June 6, 2006 @ 7:47 pm
imagine that… Comment by katy — June 6, 2006 @ 7:50 pm
I wrote that before your correction to the search string…
Comment by trillium — June 7, 2006 @ 6:39 pm
uh – no, you didn’t
320. 1. google “unside down star†…
Comment by katy — June 6, 2006 @ 7:27 pm
324. “uPside down star†duh
Comment by katy — June 6, 2006 @ 7:31 pm
343. I don’t get it…
Comment by trillium — June 6, 2006 @ 7:47 pm
just wanted to qualify that…
June 7th, 2006 at 7:36 pmGee Sugar, I can’t help but notice how similar your post is to SCAT’s writing.
Guess you guys think a lot alike, huh?
June 7th, 2006 at 7:38 pmI figured that since I was already on the transvestite recognition web site that I might as well contribute. I spotted this Adam’s apple yielding cross dresser and felt it my duty to out him.
http://www.benbolger.com/bolger.senatorclinton.jpg
I suppose this explains the numerous consent-optional encounters that his husband experienced regularly. It had to get old real fast running into a bigger piece of manhood on a nightly basis.
June 7th, 2006 at 7:41 pmWas it so hard to admit a mistake? It’s a freaking typo! (Wait. Are those allowed from now on?) No, you had to take a swing at me first.
Anyway, it’s no biggie, like you say… Except it comes in the same sentence where you bitch about someone else’s typos!! You have to admit, that’s… something!
But you admitted being wrong and that’s good. It’s a small step, but who knows, maybe one day you’ll be a real mensch.
June 7th, 2006 at 7:42 pmBTW, while you guys are busy blowin in Coulter’s, err, ear, you might want to have someone Check the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committees office.
Looks like you just lost another one.
June 7th, 2006 at 7:45 pmErik, i feel better now! the GAO projects a SURPLUS! thanks! my weekend has been salvaged. and the dot com bubble-burst took care of the surplus! OK!!
check out the gao website (www.gao.gov), where you will find this statement: “Absent policy change, a growing imbalance between expected federal spending and tax revenues will mean escalating and ultimately unsustainable federal deficits and debt.”
where did you study economics – at Sears or the Yellow Pages?
June 7th, 2006 at 7:51 pmLet me get this straight. You’re comparing, no clinging to my fat fingering a single key, to the endless spelling and grammatical errors you and your clan in here have made this evening?
Like I said, I’d work with the Speak-n-Spell for a few months and then come at me again junior.
On my worst day….
June 7th, 2006 at 7:54 pmYou’re saying you think less of my posts because you feel they involve personal attacks…
Comment by FLAVIUS `WORFEUS — June 7, 2006 @ 7:08 pm
worfeus – you would love to here this ( i posted this on another thread)
W O W – YOU HAVE TO HEAR THIS!
please, do whatever you can, however you can, and listen to what RANDI RHODES is saying, right now, about not apologizing for calling out the lies and hypocricy… truly amazing…
hopefully, it will be posted on her website… she always has podcast of each show…
A W E S O M E.
i called the show and was told they would post it on her website (therandirhodesshow.com), which is crashed now, but i will keep checking and post it when i see it…
June 7th, 2006 at 7:55 pmBaby, you’re upset! Ok, here’s the thing: I’m inspired by Whorefeus who just admitted he was wrong, so I’ll try something similar.
You’re right. You posted the correction before my response arguing your initial post was nonsense.
Instead of –
– I should have said –
My mistake. I should have read your post and the 20 after it just to make sure you didn’t come back with an errata.
Note to self: if I wait long enough, will there be corrections to ALL this liberal crap? Musing…
June 7th, 2006 at 7:56 pmWhoa… That really hit a spot with you, huh? Man, that grammar gland of yours is really sensitive. I’d have it checked out. They can do it when they check for prostate. (To see if you have one, I mean.) Ok, I’m mean now. I’ll stop. Maybe I should delete this last part. WTF am I feeling guilty? This is ridiculous, he’s mean too! I guess I’m not used to it. Well, more reason to come and hang around here.
June 7th, 2006 at 8:06 pmwhich is crashed now
Comment by katy — June 7, 2006 @ 7:55 pm
Yea, that seems to be happening to a lot of left wing sites today.
Hmmmm
June 7th, 2006 at 8:07 pmWhoa… That really hit a spot with you, huh?
Comment by trillium — June 7, 2006 @ 8:06 pm
LOL, in your dreams slappy.
June 7th, 2006 at 8:10 pmWell, more reason to come and hang around here.
Comment by trillium — June 7, 2006 @ 8:06 pm
You’d think the chance at impressing Man Coulter would be enough reason for you.
June 7th, 2006 at 8:14 pmYea, that seems to be happening to a lot of left wing sites today.
Hmmmm
Comment by FLAVIUS `WORFEUS — June 7, 2006 @ 8:07 pm
brad from brad blog called in to randi today also – he said his site is down also
NEWS FLASH! he called to say that the vote in cunninghams california district is being questioned because all the votes were DIEBOLD and there were problems…
i remember reading a story on google news last nigh that it was looking good for the dem candidate… exit polls had her is the lead… then this morning *POOF*
hmmmmmm
June 7th, 2006 at 8:14 pmLook, you don’t need to come up with a diversion to get a break… All you need is ask!
Fine. I can take a hint. It’s time to go home anyway. Ta-ta.
June 7th, 2006 at 8:19 pmAt the very least, Coulter is drawing attention to the 911 Truth movement started by one of those widows she despises for aking questions, and at the same time Ann is showing how vile a contigent she speaks for…
June 7th, 2006 at 8:20 pmYea Katy, several liberal sites I visit are also mysteriously down.
They come up, then go down again.
Obviously our soured repuggy hacker friends (or is it fiends) are tossing a few TRINOO attacks, or other DOS (Denial of Service) attacks at the liberal blog servers.
It sucks when you’ve lost your game, so they obviously are angry.
Surprised TP is up. They must have upgraded their IPS systems or something.
June 7th, 2006 at 8:21 pmhere is a newsflash for some of you so-called conservatives: just because someone does not agree with you, or with something like ann coulter, that does not make them “wacko” left-wingers.
now, to be fair, both extremes make that sophomoric mistake. (that is one reason why they occupy the extremes – both are ignorant and ill-informed, and not especially good at things like debating or writing a good sentence let alone a solid paragraph it’s why, ultimately, these chats are so boring and worthless: the competition is pathetic.)
ann coulter and george bush are NOT true conservatives. the former is just a “semi-cute,” silly little squirt of a GIRL who found a profitable formula, God Bless America, and the latter is a morally bankrupt daddy’s boy posing as a Jesus Freak.
June 7th, 2006 at 8:21 pmThere is a lot of confusion about transvestites, transgendered and drag queens. For transvestites dressing up in womens clothes is sexual, they often dress like mommie. Transgendered are people that are born in the wrong body and will go to varying lengths to have it corrected. Drag queens are female impersonators and usually involves neither sex nor being born in the wrong body, drag queens are entertainers.
In any case, none of the above have anything to do with the vile hatred that spews from Coulters mouth. As long as people continue to just complain on blogs and not organize like, Anne and the “six toed” things will stay the same.
June 7th, 2006 at 8:21 pmA break Trillium?
You mean a break from cleaning your clock?
Nahh, I don’t need no break.
Do you?
June 7th, 2006 at 8:22 pmI understand what she is talking about, but I think she simply chooses to use the most inflammatory descriptions possible. After Columbine, a father of one of the slain children went on a rampage about gun control. Cindy Sheehan’s son is killed and she goes on her own quest to pull GW down. The 9/11 widows/ers have done very much the same thing. For some reason once someone dies, their next of kin suddenly become expert in whatever field they think killed their loved one. Celebrities seem to be automatically endowed with this gift especially if they are also comedians.
June 7th, 2006 at 8:25 pmGee, isn’t it funny how when it quites down, someone comes in and posts “one last post” that sounds exactly like SCATS post?
You know, I think this, and I don’t really Agree with Ann but…..and the widowers are doing the same thing as blah blah blah…..
Odd isn’t it?
June 7th, 2006 at 8:28 pmnip, i agree with you 100%. the widows of 9-11 deserve the same symapthy we give all unfortunate people who tragically lose loved ones. no less, no more. but ours is the age of excess and instant celebrity. that’s one reason why ann coulter is so rich.
June 7th, 2006 at 8:30 pmTony said it right.
Coulter is like a southern bible preacher. She’ll tell the sheeple whatever they want to hear, as long as they give it up when they pass around the plate.
June 7th, 2006 at 8:31 pmBut I admire Coulter. I despise her, but I admire her as well. I read her like a book, albeit a cheap dimestore novel.
She selected her profession a long time ago, and she sticks to it. The more people who hate her, the more people who cry out against her, the more money she makes.
Its a simple formula. Hate sells.
And she’s the salesman of the year.
June 7th, 2006 at 8:35 pmhow much were the the families in the african embassies paid? how much were the families of the oklahoma city bombings paid? you know, i am fed up with the wtc victimes families. i am sorry for their losses, but i can see where ann coulter is coming from.
June 7th, 2006 at 8:38 pmi am fed up with the wtc victimes families. i am sorry for their losses, but i can see where ann coulter is coming from.
Comment by anne — June 7, 2006 @ 8:38 pm
Gee imagine that. Another “reasonable” person posting a post where they say, they’re sorry for their losses but they see where ann coulter is coming from.
Who’d've thunk it?
June 7th, 2006 at 8:48 pmYea, Ann’s right. They’re a bunch of money grubbing bitches who seek fame and fortune.
ANYONE who DARES speak out against the war, is AUTOMATICALLY a traitor, a money grubbing whore, and an enemy to the state.
Someone get me my armband.
June 7th, 2006 at 8:51 pmAnn, where do we sign up for the Reichstag plan?
I’m game.
This democracy stuff doesn’t seem to be working.
But I get to be ReichFuhrer first.
June 7th, 2006 at 8:53 pmI thought there was an “O” in country!
June 7th, 2006 at 9:12 pmWell there is. I mean if there wasn’t it would spell Cun….
Ahhh.
June 7th, 2006 at 9:21 pmSo just to make sure I got a handle on this, Ann’s argument is that the 911 widows are money grubbing whores because they use their status as widows of murdered relatives, to further a cause?
Ok.
So Ann Coulter would like Nancy Grace off the air?
Is that her argument too?
How about John Walsh?
You know the guy from America’s most wanted?
He should be off the air too by the same standard, right?
June 7th, 2006 at 9:30 pm[...] Informational Bloggers: Michelle Malkin, Expose the Left, Think Progress. | Permalink No Comments» [...]
June 7th, 2006 at 9:35 pmCome on, someone answer my question.
Does that mean John Walsh is a money grubbing whore too?
Is America’s most wanted vile because Walsh used the death of his daughter to further a cause?
June 7th, 2006 at 9:57 pmOutrageous! Dancing on the graves of the dead!
Now that the Bush administration has raised the enlistment age to 58, in that Coulter professes to believe in and support the so-called war on terror, there is no reason that if she “really†believes it, that she should not enlist immediately.
Right or wrong, our brave military believes in the mission enough to join and lay their lives on the line and there is no reason why Coulter, the Bush daughters, Lynn Cheney, Hannity, O’Reiley and other right wing whackos shouldn’t dedicate their lives to the war on terror.
Then they’ll find out what it’s “really†all about!
C. Lewis
June 7th, 2006 at 9:59 pmCorrection. John Walsh used the death of his son Adam to further a cause.
June 7th, 2006 at 10:02 pmIs that true? Is the enlistment age really 58?
June 7th, 2006 at 10:04 pmCoulter’s words are indefensible. I am just curious if the posters on this site were as outraged when legt-wing commentator and columnits Ted Rall used similar terms against the widows of 9/11 victims.
June 7th, 2006 at 11:06 pmCORRETED: Coulter’s words are indefensible. I am just curious if the posters on this site were as outraged when left-wing commentator and columnist Ted Rall used similar terms against the widows of 9/11 victims. Consistency is the key to credibility.
June 7th, 2006 at 11:09 pmCORRECTED: Coulter’s words are indefensible. I am just curious if the posters on this site were as outraged when left-wing commentator and columnist Ted Rall used similarly deplorable terms against the widows of 9/11 victims. Consistency is the key to credibility.
June 7th, 2006 at 11:10 pmClearly Ann Coulter relies on shock value and this notion that conservative America revels in statements that diminish the legitimacy of liberal “values.” Frankly, she is a coarse and abusive individual willing to regurgitate any republican propaganda to sell books to middle america.
June 7th, 2006 at 11:17 pmAgreed, Kyle…Clearly Coulter does rely on shock value. But again, I must wonder if people who frequent this site were as outraged when Ted Rall and Ward Churchill made similar remarks.
June 7th, 2006 at 11:21 pmBut isn’t it ultimately true? Isn’t it indeed difficult to argue policy with someone who lost a spouse? And therefore, isn’t it cheap politics to parade those who have lost the spouse out into the media to carry the banner of the cause, knowing it is difficult to argue policy against them? I mean, who is going to argue about the positives of the Iraq war against the devastated mother of a lost soldier? Isn’t it sort of diabolical to have the left opportunistically push such mothers into the spotlight to advance the democratic anti-war cause?
Its actually brilliant politics by the left. I congratulate them on their savvy. Ann is just calling them out, it appears. Its no different then Bush having Iraqi women in the audience at the state of the union speaches. Who is going to argue with abused women who were set free that America should abandon Iraq?
I think that is all Ann is trying to say. You folks are reading too much into it, or falling for the “shock value” of the language. YOu’re smarter than that.
June 7th, 2006 at 11:42 pmpost 445, me
… It should never be a crime to utter truth.
Comment by Bruce
post 454
Whether you or Ann like it or not the fact of the matter is anyone that was involved in 911 has the RIGHT on their own to advocate their position on 911.. The democrats do not have to go out and round these people up! THEY WERE THERE. They have the right NOT because they are being paid by the DNC or whatever fantasy you are dreaming up. YOu are simply on the attack against anyone that disagrees with you whether they have a valid point or not. The agrument you are trying to make is totally bunk. It is as if you are saying a victim whose family is killed by some companies negligence has no right to participate in a lawsuit against the company because they were injured and are just using it as a tool to join in with that companies opponents. How REDICULOUS of a notion!. They WERE injured and they DO have a valid right to talk about it…. you just dont like that you are wrong and they are right and some of them happen to be democrats… well TOO DAMN BAD. You lose. Losers. If you were not a bunch of unAmerican turncoat Saudi Arabian appologists it would not bother you that they want answers and action taken because of their lose on 911.
Comment by Gerald Gibson — June 7, 2006 @ 8:17 am
Wow, Gerald, I see you took your happiness and rationality pills yesterday :p In fact, I also doubt the official version of the 911 events, I am impressed by some of the commentary of Alex Jones, whom some might call a conspiracy theorist. But I do not know the facts, so am not qualified to opine on that or on the motives of the subject 911 widows, so I will not. I also do not believe that the Saudis are our friends, although they are likely the friends of petroleum America – including our president.
I also agree that all have the right to opine, but opinion should be sound judgement based on fact. Analogy arguments are weak. If you know the facts of this situation, argue and opine about them. I agree that Ann’s words were strong-harsh, but I maintain she may be correct.
And now for Wonkette-ish commentary, I do become excited (take that either way) when I see Ann or Michelle take down panty-wastes that undermine our physical, mental, or financial security, culture, or sovereignty – and included in those are our president and much of our Senate. I am dismayed by the disintegration and fragmentation of our country, and they inspire me and give me hope. ‘You or Ann’ sounds romantic! If lovin’ Ann is wrong, I don’t wanna be right.
June 7th, 2006 at 11:49 pmI’m upset that mentally ill people are living the rich pampered life without having any common sense or being able to empathize others that may not be as fortunate as them. This crazy lady was born with a silver spoon in her mouth and thinks all of us are born with life when she wouldn’t last a day without a maid cleaning her toilet bowl!
June 8th, 2006 at 12:17 amI’m upset that mentally ill people are living the rich pampered life without having any common sense or being able to empathize others that may not be as fortunate as them. This crazy lady was born with a silver spoon in her mouth and thinks all of us are born with life when she wouldn’t last a day without a maid cleaning her toilet bowl!
June 8th, 2006 at 12:17 amAnn Coulter is snake vomit that has taken the form of an exceedingly ugly human female. The walking feces that buy her neo nazi right wing facist books are worthless sub human hate mongers unworthy of life on this beautiful planet which they are polluting everything they are in the presence of.
June 8th, 2006 at 12:27 amSorry, about the last post but I am mad! The nerve of this women !!! Widows lost loved ones and childern lost parents !! That greedy, insane woman making such comments – go check her out on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Coulter
from that webpage: “In June 2005, Coulter purchased a $1.8 million home on Palm Beach Island in Florida.”
Where did all your money come from Ann? Did your husband die and you made a profit or did you make a profit by charging dumb people on your divine “holy” wisdom. Who left you in charge and the holy saint?!??!
June 8th, 2006 at 12:27 am…Ted Rall used similarly deplorable terms against the widows of 9/11 victims.
Comment by Exley — June 7, 2006 @ 11:10 pm
namely? links?
June 8th, 2006 at 12:32 amWard Churchill made similar remarks.
Comment by Exley — June 7, 2006 @ 11:21 pm
I hated Ward Churchill calling the victims of 911 little Eichmans.
He has a different axe to grind, and he used 911 wrongly to grind it.
I feel for him as an American Indian, but what he said was hubris.
June 8th, 2006 at 12:35 amBut one question?
What the HELL does THAT have to do with Ann Coulters new book???
June 8th, 2006 at 12:44 amAnn Colter is hot! Ward Churchill just voices everything that liberals are thinking but won’t come out and say. Liberals hate Christianity, free enterprise, and patriotism; everything that makes this country great.
June 8th, 2006 at 12:56 amAbsolutely incredible that trolls keep coming on here to defend a vicious cross-dresser from Hell Ann Coulter! Shame on anyone who defends that bitch > actually bastard since Ann’s a guy with a penis between his legs!
June 8th, 2006 at 1:03 amAnyone ever see the British movie “The Crying Game”? Guy in the movie falls in love with a gal who is a guy in drag > they start kissing in a hotel and take off their clothes > the gal’s penis flops out and the guy flips out! That is what happened to Bill Maher when he had sex with Ann Coulter >lol.
June 8th, 2006 at 1:07 amAnn Colter is hot! Ward Churchill just voices everything that liberals are thinking but won’t come out and say. Liberals hate Christianity, free enterprise, and patriotism; everything that makes this country great.
Comment by Tommy — June 8, 2006 @ 12:56 am
Tommy?
You’re an idiot.
Ann Coulter is a voice for the conservative movement, and a public figure, and widely popular author among the right wing.
Ward Churchill is a nut, that is in no way a voice for anyone other than himself, and has no official or unofficial mandate to speak, write, teach or poll for the left wing.
Are we learning yet nimrod?
June 8th, 2006 at 1:32 amLiberals hate Christianity, free enterprise, and patriotism; everything that makes this country great.
Comment by Tommy — June 8, 2006 @ 12:56 am
now, WHO told you that? silly rabbit…
June 8th, 2006 at 1:35 amsince when is the right to speak your mind, no matter what (or how offensive) your opinion is, something that we, as americans, should criticize? the fundamental purpose of the first ammendment is that one person should be allowed, without criticism or retribution, to speak at the top of their lungs a point of view that you would speak out against at the top of yours. it is a system of intellectual debate, not arbitrary accusation. it should be a world of unrelenting compromise, not one of merciless persecution. get a clue.
June 8th, 2006 at 1:40 amFrom Hero to Patriot in 1.9 seconds.
Just speak out against Bushy, and you’re the bad guy.
Doesn’t matter what service you’ve rendered for your country. Doesn’t matter whether you’ve lost a limb, or a loved one, you merit nothing from this sordid hive.
From the likes of these, all one must do to be a hero, an all American Flag draped Star Spangled Hero, is just “agree” with them.
And all one must do to be a Traitor, regardless of any service or sacrifice you’ve made for your nation, is disagree with them
They did it to the Dixie Chicks, and now they’re doing it to the victims of 911.
June 8th, 2006 at 1:54 amF.U.B.A.R
June 8th, 2006 at 2:13 amThe best thing for us to do now is ignore her, it is obvious that these inflammatory remarks are designed to sell books. All of this controversy is only prolonging the amount of time we have to watch that long-necked (have you noticed the size of that thing?) freak pitch her latest piece of sensationalist garbage.
June 8th, 2006 at 2:22 amI disagree. If enough people get the actual quotes from the book out there, like Matt Lauer did, and TP did, then lots of people won’t bother with it.
Look at what DailyKos did to 5 easy peices. It was number 1.
I mean number freakin 1. And after there exposure, its not even in the top 100 now.
Not that I would want to in any way restrict the flow of sales of Anns book. For all I care, she can make millions selling her swill. Let the right wing nimrods read it long enough, and maybe even they will figure out how screwed up they are.
June 8th, 2006 at 2:31 amI got something she can put in her mouth.
June 8th, 2006 at 3:11 amThis woman has lost her mind! Such hatred.
June 8th, 2006 at 3:22 amAnn Coulter Tackles the Menace of Widows and Grieving Mothers…
In an appearance on the Today Show, promoting her autobiography, Godless, Ann Coulter courageously tackled the frightening menace of widows and grieving mothers. …
June 8th, 2006 at 4:52 am#627 Tommy; Ann Coulter is hot.
June 8th, 2006 at 7:21 am
Dear Mr. Coulter…
Most of us long ago figured out that you are a nut job who lacks the common decency God gave a cockroach……
June 8th, 2006 at 7:45 amlet the hypocrisy flow all you left wingnuts. You cannot in one sentence complain about “hate speech” ( anything liberals disagree with) and in the next sentence talk about Ann Coulter in the most vile of terms and look legitimate. Now I know that hypocrisy and trying to silence dissent is one of the cornerstones of liberal thinking ( now there is an oxymoron describing morons) but while you whine and snivel about Coulter you engage in the exact behavoir you are railing against.
June 8th, 2006 at 7:54 amLast night on Herr Olberman, the new poster boy for the liberal leftards was the perfect example of the sheer hypocrisy and stupidity . In one sentence the big blockhead decried Coulter for saying that these widows were using their husbands death for political gain and in the next sentence actually prove that they WERE using their husband’s death for politcal gain! I know that liberals are delusional, small minded little whiners and Nazi hunters but you cannot have it both ways.
Ann Coulter’s effectiveness is obvious. the more the left wing socialist, anti American crowd whines and complains the better job she is doing and the closer she is getting to the truth. Go ahead you little liberals keep making noise everytime somebody slays one of your sacred cows. Everytime you do you prove once again how anti- American you are and how utterly hypocritical and stupid you sound. Keep up the good work!
PS slick willie sorry to ruin your romantic inclinations but I think Ann would choke on small bones.
June 8th, 2006 at 7:57 am#627 is more of the “God is a Republican” bull sh!t spouted by desperate to cling to power by any device, no matter how base and vile. Freeperworld is collective psychosis at the expense of our democracy.
June 8th, 2006 at 9:07 amMatt Lauer is clearly missing the point of Anne Coulters quote—typical of liberals. Instead he wants to focus on, and make an issue out of her use of the word “broad”—anything to avoid her charge that the left uses victims that cannot be responded to. The hysterical thing about this, is that most of you are completely unable to see that.
June 8th, 2006 at 9:25 amThe number of ad hominem attacks on Ann Coulter for her ad hominem attacks is amazing. Some of you have to actually be trying to define the outer bounds of hypocrisy with your comments. And sadly, this is exactly what Coulter was railing against: If someone is a victim, they are out-of-bounds to criticism. The 9/11 widows/ers obviously have a ‘right’ to criticize whomever and whatever they want. However, they should be given the same amount of credence as anyone else who has no credentials/experience/knowledge of what they are yapping about. If I started squealing about the Iraq war or politics, I would (rightly) be ignored. Not that I know nothing about the topics (I read 25+ hours a week on these subjects), but simply because I have no education/work experience/special knowledge of these subjects. The 9/11 victims get airtime, even when it is obvious they know nothing more than what they read off the front page of the New York Times or are coached on by the left-wingers who want to exploit them. And when they speak, anybody who criticizes them is immediately attacked for being insensitive to their tragic loss.
Ann Coulter fills the same right-wing niche people like Molly Ivins, Al Franken and Bill Maher fill for the left-wing, except Coulter actually has political experience and I think even a law degree. What I find most amusing, are the people whose best argument are to call into question her gender. Is that really the best you can come up with? A 3rd grader’s insult?
June 8th, 2006 at 9:37 amI wonder if the families of the GI’s that have been killed in Iraq and Afganistan think about her 911 comments ?? I often wonder why the lives lost in 911 where worth so much more than those GI’s that have been killed or mutilated in this war ? Do a degree i think she may have a point . I understand that the ones who lost their lives in 911 were civilians and not military , but is the loss any less ???? It sometimes appears to me that things are slightly tilted towards the less fortunate people that defend our country .
June 8th, 2006 at 9:44 amAnne Coulter is a vicious, bitter, and malicious shrew! Although the 9/11 attacks did in fact happen to our entire nation, imagine our devastation multiplied exponentially for those who lost loved ones in the attack. She criticizes the widows for presenting their political views, but only if they are opposed to her own views. If she feels they have no right to voice their opinions, what gives her the right to do so. As to her interview style, she is much like the head of the party she so staunchly supports. She can spout her rehearsed rhetoric, but ask her a direct question and she gets that “deer in the headlights look” with a well…. hmmm…. oh….. How could anyone buy this witch’s book.
June 8th, 2006 at 9:57 amyou guys HAVE to know that it make her day when you get all riled up…Its good clean fun.
Comment by Alan #303
Asswipeassin,
…until somebody kills YOUR wife and kids…
…and you sound as if YOU deserve it…
June 8th, 2006 at 9:59 am…Let’s ALL hope that the NEXT streaker with a pie…
…puts a little acid in it…
June 8th, 2006 at 10:04 am…make that A LOT of acid…
June 8th, 2006 at 10:05 amThanks to your site for providing a transcript of this interview.
To all the Coulter-haters, please understand: For every Coulter who doesnt mine words, we republicans have to deal with with vicious, unhinged attacks on a regular basis from the ‘Moores’, the ‘Frankens’, the Hollywood Left, the media, protestors, and not to mention, even your elected officials. The ‘Jersey Girls’ might have been called “broads”, but virtually every republican has been labeled “Hitler”, among other hateful comments, on a regular basis.
June 8th, 2006 at 10:17 am[...] Then there’s the blonde case of drunken anorexia that calls herself Ann Coulter (real name: Eva Braun II). She’s been making the talk show rounds to promote her latest piece of fiction which I will not name here, to spare the children who might be reading, but going about it in a very odd way; griping about the widows of men killed by the 9/11 attacks, calling them “broads… reveling in their status as celebrities,” and claiming she has “never seen people enjoying their husbands’ death so much.” (Today Show Transcript here.) She’s also accused them, at different times, of making campaign ads for both Clinton and Kerry. I’m not aware of any ads the 9/11 widows made for either Hillary or Bill, especially since some of them voted Republican before 9/11, and it would only make sense for them to support Kerry against Bush since they think El Roto has done such an awful job. [...]
June 8th, 2006 at 10:34 amTo bad Ann Coulter isn’t on the morning show everyday to make Brokeback Lauer squirm in his chair every morning
June 8th, 2006 at 10:58 amHey Chris, nice try but you still sound like her pusswhipped punk.
Course, when you get downstairs and find out she’s packing, you might as well just go for it.
You did with your dad.
June 8th, 2006 at 10:59 amTo bad Ann Coulter isn’t on the morning show everyday to make Brokeback Lauer squirm in his chair every morning
Comment by Ron — June 8, 2006 @ 10:58 am
Too bad Coulter’s balls aren’t big enough to actually go on a real show.
Lets see her on Meet the Press, or how about Hardball? How about Oberman?
She’s a coward.
June 8th, 2006 at 11:03 amHell she doesn’t even have the gnads to debate me in a blog.
I’ve called her chicken ass out a dozen times.
She’s nothing. She says foul ridiiculous things so buttsuckers like you Chris, and the other greaseballs who worship her, will buy her book.
You’re fools following a traitor and a coward.
June 8th, 2006 at 11:08 amPS slick willie sorry to ruin your romantic inclinations but I think Ann would choke on small bones.
Comment by Chris — June 8, 2006 @ 7:57 am
Why? She seems to be fine with your tiny bone.
June 8th, 2006 at 11:10 amAnn Coulter and Nancy Grace ‘The Dream Team 2012′…
June 8th, 2006 at 11:13 amoh, the horror of it all. Ann Coulter is the poster child for “Girls Behaving Badly”
June 8th, 2006 at 11:55 amI…
June 8th, 2006 at 12:04 pmwant…
June 8th, 2006 at 12:05 pmto post…
June 8th, 2006 at 12:06 pm… the 666th coment in the Ann Coulter’s Thread. And say that
she’s hell-bent to the child of the Devil.
June 8th, 2006 at 12:11 pmI just heard that Bush/PNAC Disinformationalist/CIA Operative Ann Coulter has invited the 911 widows she horrendously insulted to debate her on Faux News. I hope that some of the women will seize on this opportunity, since Coulter is a woman who thrives on one-way communication, since most things she says are either lies, or irrelevant distractions from the subject at hand, which cannot stand up to criticism.
If some of the women do plan to attend, here are some resources they may wish to consider:
25 Tactics of Disinformation/Truth Suppression
http://www.benfrank.net/disinfo/
Of Logical Fallacies & Disinformation
http://www.intrepidsoftware.com/fallacy/toc.php
A discussion of Disinformation on Faux News would be the ultimate irony, since it is their bread & butter, as well as the Bush/PNAC (www.newamericancentury.org) Regime’s first line of defense/propaganda conduit to their Useful Idiots.
Remember not to fall into Coulter’s traps. Bring the topic back under control, back to the main subject, which is actually the failure/criminality of the Bush/PNAC Regime. Coulter will not be able to respond, since Bush/PNAC are tearing the country apart for their own profit & ideology.
You may also wish to refer to the excellent chapters on Coulter’s lies in Al Franken’s “Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them”. Again, Coulter will become indignant (disinfo) and insult Franken, implying he has no credibility (disinfo), but she will not be able to address his charges.
Also, Coulter was completely humiliated on “The Fifth Estate”, a program on the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (www.cbc.ca), which focused on the sad state of American media punditry and vitriole. The capper was her claiming that Canada had sent troops to Vietnam – which we did not – but when corrected, she couldn’t admit her mistake, and fell back on “I’ll have to get back to you on that”.
The CBC did an updated version of the program, and stated that they tried several times to contact Coulter, but she would not speak with them. (Was quite delicious to watch!)
Anyhow, I won’t waste anymore of your time. Just thought this sad situation presented a possibly great opportunity to put this b*tch in her place once and for all.
May Peace & Reason return in the days ahead …
Jordan Thornton
June 8th, 2006 at 1:52 pmCanada, eh?
Has Ann Coulter gone too far?
Not far enough
June 8th, 2006 at 2:02 pmAnn, you are a vile, pathetic excuse of a human being (he/she?). You lack the basic characteristics that make humans human – empathy, compassion, respect, etc. Enough said!
June 8th, 2006 at 2:19 pmhey ! where were all you whining, genital obsessed leftards when big chief and psuedo injun Ward Churchill made the “little Eichmans” remark. Where was your little one sided sense of outrage and idignation? You hypocrite bastard liberal/socialist/progressive/whatever bastards are so twisted by your hatred of anything that does not follow the liberal dogma that you cannot even see the hypocrisy. You logic is ruled by your sexual organs and your anti- Americanism . You cannot even see that the real America is never going to buy your twisted BS no matter what you say.
June 8th, 2006 at 2:52 pmYou can act like five year olds an yell Nazi and make transgender and cross dressing jokes all you want but you cannot dispute the FACTS .I thought homos and trannies and other filthy deviants were part of your libtard religion. Why do you insist on using sexual proclivities that you worship so much as denigrations? Oh I forget that hypocrisy is the main premise and basis for all left wingnut ideology.
My fault for even responding to the juvenile penis size thing but all you liberals ever have to fight the truth with is genitals and nazis. it is starting to become clear to me that it is you leftards that have some sort of sexual -nazi fetish.
The left wing in this country is on the verge of coming totally unhinged. Excuse me, you on the left are unhinged but by advertising it now we in the real America all know it. Nice job idiots.
#650
Comment by Leslie in New Jersey — June 8, 2006 @ 9:57 am
She criticizes the widows for presenting their political views, but only if they are opposed to her own views. If she feels they have no right to voice their opinions, what gives her the right to do so.
Anne Coulter clearly did not crticize the widows for presenting their political views. She criticized the left for exploiting their loss. Anyone who has been directly affected by 9/11 or the war on terror, and denounces that war, and brings accusation to Bush is given air time, interviews, and feature stories in magazines. You seldom hear from their counter-parts. It was a little much for her to claim that these widows were enjoying thier husbands death though. Unless that is a direct quote from some of those widows—it would be pretty hard to prove that statement.
She can spout her rehearsed rhetoric, but ask her a direct question and she gets that “deer in the headlights look†with a well…. hmmm…. oh…..
The only questions Matt Lauer had, was from specific comments in Annes book, taken out of their context. As he was focusing on her harsh expressions in the book, he completely missed the message. Anne knew it, and she wasn’t going dignify his pointless questions with a direct responce. Notice how she kept tryng to explain the reasons for her comments in her book. Basically, if you don’t understand the message, you can’t ask the right questions.
June 8th, 2006 at 3:02 pmI agree with chris. You people have not stated one credible argument against the “Goddess”. I really like the statement “But ignorant people buy a lot of books” in post 10. I guess the enlighten have no reason to read books. Perhaps they would like to burn them instead. I have read several of her books and they are quite eye-opening and very well researched. If the left would perhaps try a listen for a change and read her books and check out her research maybe Matt could have asked am intellegent question. I present this challenge read “Treason” by Miss Coulter, check her research, and come back here and tell us your still a democrat. I dare you.
June 8th, 2006 at 4:58 pmI guess it’s a bad thing then that the – as Ann Coulter so eloquently put it – Witches of East Brunswick actually had the balls to stand up to Duh-Dubya & Co. and demanded an independent panel investigate the many failings leading up to 9/11, which Duh-Dubya & Co. fought against, tooth and nail. I guess the GOP LIKE living in the dark and enjoy taking this Administration’s words as truth. And I guess those who demand answers to the many failings of Duh-Dubya & Co. are just doing it because they have nothing else to do but piss off the GOP. Nah, those who lost spouses, sisters, brothers, etc. are just sitting around twiddling their thumbs, thinking what posturing can they do now and waiting for the evil Democrats to use them for their own evil devices because Duh-Dubya & Co. and the rest of the GOP are so forthcoming with information and truth.
June 8th, 2006 at 5:00 pmToo bad Coulter forgets the FIRST use of political infallibility–John “Adolph” Ashcroft, presenting the bill for the Patriot Act to a congressional committee with only a few hours to study its thousands of pages, and declaring, “If you oppose this legislation, you are on the side of the terrorists!”
June 8th, 2006 at 5:17 pmComment by Antagonist — June 8, 2006 @ 3:02 pm
The only questions Matt Lauer had, was from specific comments in Annes book, taken out of their context. As he was focusing on her harsh expressions in the book, he completely missed the message. Anne knew it, and she wasn’t going dignify his pointless questions with a direct responce. Notice how she kept tryng to explain the reasons for her comments in her book. Basically, if you don’t understand the message, you can’t ask the right questions.
I think it is you who is missing the point here, Antagonist. My anger is based EXACTLY on her comments. Regardless of her “reasons for them” which I could not care less about, she admitted making these statements. They were directed at the 9/11 widows and were insulting to them and the memories of their loved ones. I have news for you, Anne Coulter is a millionaire who didn’t earn it – that’s for sure. I wouldn’t waste a nickel on her book to find our her “reasons”. I’d say Anne Coulter is perpetually “testy”.
June 8th, 2006 at 5:27 pmAnn Coulter’s words about the widows of 911 are a all time low even for her…how can someone who talks about god say such ugly words…does she not think these ladies have children…or will she do anythng or say anything to sell her book? how sad!!!!
June 8th, 2006 at 5:34 pmI have a comment about the compensations paid out to the 9/11 families. While we can argue that this is well deserved by everyone who lost a loved one in this horrendous tragedy, I would also like to pose the question “Why do we single these families out for compensation and not give like compensation to any and all families who have lost a loved one in a tragedy?” What about the soldiers dying on the front line of every war ever fought? Or how about just the soldiers who have died in this war on terror? Do you think their families have been compensated as well? I think not.
June 8th, 2006 at 6:03 pmWhy single out one event and make the lives of these 9/11 vicitms any more valuable than the lives of other victims?
This bothers me beyond comprehension. As a wife of a former Military Officer who fought in Vietnam and the 1st Gulf War, I see this as a travesty for all the families who have lost a loved one and never received anything. Not even a thank you.
I have a comment about the compensations paid out to the 9/11 families. While we can argue that this is well deserved by everyone who lost a loved one in this horrendous tragedy, I would also like to pose the question “Why do we single these families out for compensation and not give like compensation to any and all families who have lost a loved one in a tragedy?†What about the soldiers dying on the front line of every war ever fought? Or how about just the soldiers who have died in this war on terror? Do you think their families have been compensated as well? I think not.
Why single out one event and make the lives of these 9/11 vicitms any more valuable than the lives of other victims?
This bothers me beyond comprehension. As a wife of a former Military Officer who fought in Vietnam and the 1st Gulf War, I see this as a travesty for all the families who have lost a loved one and never received anything. Not even a thank you.
Comment by Linda
Shock and Awe mainly… normally Americans would NOT give all that money to those people … but like after Pearl Harbor Americans wanted to ban together and DO SOMETHING …. too bad we didnt have the republican… nor democratic leaders to capitalism on the American spirit that was alive and well in those weeks right after 911.
June 8th, 2006 at 6:12 pmAnne Coulter clearly did not crticize the widows for presenting their political views.
Comment by Antagonist
Bullshit!
Just because you are too dense to catch on to the game these nazis play does not justify her.
See this is how it works … the right (christians in general) set themselves up as the “victims” even when in NO WAY are they the victims… but they tell a story as if the whole world is out to get them and then get their sheep to rally around in a circle against this non existant attack…
Oh dear me! These 911 familys are allowed to attack ME! ME! but I am not allowed to attack back!! oh pooooor me!
Noooo ANN… You can say any crazy thing you want … this is AMERICA… but if what you are saying is CRAZY… well…. then people are going to think you are a NUT. It has NOTHING to do with those 911 familys.
Ann is just making up excuses for why she cannot shoot down the points of those familys… like why did BushCo do NOTHING after receiving a CLEAR warning in his intelligence report that Osama was about to attack America and was interested in using airliners as weapons…. come on ANN ANSWER THAT! Oh you cant? Well then attack the people that asked the question …. the 911 familys…. YEP! REICHWINGER all the way …. dont like the message? Attack the messagener even if the message is correct…
June 8th, 2006 at 6:20 pmThis last comment is not worthy of a heartfelt comment, but I will say that this man has no idea what he is talking about, nor does he have much of a grasp on the English language.
June 8th, 2006 at 6:31 pmI think you should be at least somewhat literate to comment on such serious issues.
[...] Matt Lauer of the TODAY Show read the following about the 9/11 widows from her book Godless These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by grief-arazzies. I have never seen people enjoying their husbands’ death so much. [...]
June 8th, 2006 at 6:37 pmThis last comment is not worthy of a heartfelt comment, but I will say that this man has no idea what he is talking about, nor does he have much of a grasp on the English language.
I think you should be at least somewhat literate to comment on such serious issues.
Comment by Linda
If you got a problem dont play the grammar nazi game … list your points… if you dont have any then dont post.
Now if you were refering to me … well I dont know what you are talking about … I was giving a nonpartisan explaination about why the 911 familys got money and most people that die in tragedys do not.
If you were not talking to me … well my grammar nazi comment still stands. If you dont understand english then dont read english websites … if you can read english then the grammar doesnt matter.
June 8th, 2006 at 6:44 pmWe all know that Ann Coulter can be a bit “abrasive” in her delivery. And the point she is trying to make is almost lost in her blunt approach….but I understand her point. The phrase “you don’t kick someone when they are down” comes to mind. And I believe that Ann Coulter is making that kind of statement. It’s unseemly to reprimand the widows and family members of those lost in 9/11. But my point about compensation for them still stands. But then, nothing in life is fair, is it?
June 8th, 2006 at 6:50 pmGerald. You silly, ignorant man. This is the last post I am going to write today, but I just had to let this illiterate freak know how foolish he sounds and what a huge laugh most of us “educated” people get out of idiotic people such as GERALD!
God Bless the Troops! Carry on!
June 8th, 2006 at 6:56 pmGerald. You silly, ignorant man. This is the last post I am going to write today, but I just had to let this illiterate freak know how foolish he sounds and what a huge laugh most of us “educated†people get out of idiotic people such as GERALD!
God Bless the Troops! Carry on!
Comment by Linda
So you are saying you have no points you just love supporting Nazism … ok I understand where you are coming from. Go read a book … you need it.
June 8th, 2006 at 7:27 pmLinda,
You people disrespect the victims of 911, but if they agree with you then you use them to sell your war.
Don’t think for two seconds you can sell that crap here.
If they agreed with you, they’d be heroes.
June 8th, 2006 at 8:26 pmok……I meant to log off and not post again. I did. But Gerald, sweetie, you are off point. Stop this ranting while you still have just the tiniest bit of pride left.
June 8th, 2006 at 8:38 pmAnd by the way? I not only read. I have written and published three books. And I strongly urge you to take some time to rethink your replies. Once again, Gerald, stay on point. My point is that 9/11 families should not be treated any differently than the rest of the population who have lost loved ones in a tragedy such as WAR. And that Ann Coulter is only stating that throwing out these families for the sake of pity is wrong, and that the liberals in this good Country of our’s seem to be doing just that. The liberals are taking advantage of these good people and making them think they are actualy doing them a favor. Whether you agree with her or not, that is her point. Give us someone we can disagree with fairly, those of us that disagree. As I said before “don’t kick someone when they are down” in responding negatively to a family member of 9/11 we would be kicking someone when they are down. Not fair play.
Now brush up on your writing skills, Gerald. And take a doggie downer for good measure!
Oh, Flavius…please. Why must you be so angry? This is not my war. I’m not sure at all whether we should even be in Iraq. But we are there now and I support our troops. Our wonderful, courageous fighting men and women. I always will, and I don’t think putting this war down is in any way supportive of them. I am no soothsayer, I cannot predict the outcome of all this. And to suggest that I would disrespect the families of 9/11 is just hateful. God bless them all……I know the hurt and anger and pain they have went through, and are still going through. I too have gone through similar pain…..horrible, gut wrenching pain. But it was becasue I lost a loved one to War. I would never use anyone for my own gain. That is not who I am……and I am not a liberal or a conservative. I am an independent thinker. Try to think outside the box now and then, Flavius. Just give it a try. You, my dear, are the one selling crap here!
June 8th, 2006 at 8:57 pmRegarding the compensation paid to the survivors of 9/11 victims, let’s remember that these payments were offered in order to save the airlines from devastating lawsuits. It was deemed by our government to be economically advisable to settle. So, in fact, the survivors gave their assurance to not sue the airlines and were paid a settlement in return. It is unfair to compare these losses to our military losses. They were civilians who had every right to expect the airlines and their government to take appropriate measures to protect them from hijackings. For the time being, our military is still a volunteer force. Of course, I do believe it is the responsibility of the military to adequately provide for the survivors of our military dead similarly. I support our troops 100% even though I do not support the Commander-in-Chief who has sent them into harms way.
June 8th, 2006 at 9:33 pmLinda are you freakin kiddin me?
After 911 you and your scum paraded the victims of 911 around as heroes. They were sacred, and you guys were all over anyone who DARED to dis them in any way.
Remember the scam artists? And the outrage over it, as people were claiming to be 911 victims for various benefits? Remember the outcry?
But now, just because they dare to speak their own mind, and not agree with you, suddenly you’re bashing them, like the cheap hack you are.
Go back to the reichstag Berlin Betty. I think dolph is lookin for you.
June 8th, 2006 at 10:24 pmAnd BTW, they’re not looking for GAIN.
They’re just disagreeing with YOU.
June 8th, 2006 at 10:25 pmI know it sucks, but then again it sucks to be you.
June 8th, 2006 at 10:27 pmAnd that Ann Coulter is only stating that throwing out these families for the sake of pity is wrong, and that the liberals in this good Country of our’s seem to be doing just that. The liberals are taking advantage of these good people and making them think they are actualy doing them a favor.
Comment by Berlin Betty — June 8, 2006 @ 8:57 pm
Thats not even close to what Ann Coulter is “stating”. She is insulting them, degrading them and trying to dismiss THEIR point.
See what you bozo’s never get (don’t worry, I won’t tell anyone who you really are), is that not everyone are blind mindless sheep like you, waiting to be led.
These women have spoken and written endlessly about THEIR message, and how it is helping them to know that they are working for what THEY believe in.
Not someone else. This is their way of fighting back. Their way of making their husbands death mean something.
I know thats hard for someone so unfamiliar with truth and human nobility to understand, but then again, you guys don’t need to understand. You just need to someon to follow.
June 8th, 2006 at 10:49 pmYou make a good point, Leslie. But it seems less like compensation paid to these survivors, and more like a back room deal, if what you say is true.
June 8th, 2006 at 10:53 pmAs far as the Military loss of life and your remarks about it not being fair to compare the two? Well, maybe not. Maybe we should keep turning a blind eye to the families left behind when a soldier dies. Our “military dead” as you call them, are the backbone of our society and without them we would surely be in a world of hurt. Yes, they volunteer to serve their Country, absolutely. But the point I have been trying to make all along, is that so many of this Country’s citizens have perished in catastrophies of all kinds and their families have never been compensated in any way, shape or form. If we believe it is right to compensate one group of people, it is only fair to compensate all groups. And why didn’t the families of the people who died at the Pentagon receive any compensation? Didn’t they have the same rights as the civilians aboard the airplanes that were hijacked? Does this sound fair to you?
I’m glad you support our troops, but for some reason I don’t believe you understand “our troops” otherwise you would not have been so disrespectful as to say “our military dead”. You dishonor them with your remarks. They are more than a body bag.
And yes, it is understood by all who enlist in the Military that one day they may find themselves in harms way……it’s a risk they take. Just as defying gravity and hopping on board an airplane is a risk, we all know what these risks are but we do it anyway. So who decides which life is more valuable?
It doesn’t matter if you support President Bush or not, it has nothing to do with my statement that ALL citizens of this Country should be treated equally.
So tell us fair and balanced Linda who is only in here 2 days after this post dried up, trying to get the last word in and supporting Coulter, although you are of course completely impartial, how do you feel about John Walsh?
He’s made a mint off the death of his son, Adam.
Is America most wanted bad?
Should it be taken off the air?
Should he give the money back?
June 8th, 2006 at 11:07 pmWhat about Nancy Grace?
Hell she wasn’t even related to her loss. It was her fiance.
And apparently she embellished the story to get on the air.
Should she get off the air to?
June 8th, 2006 at 11:12 pmBoth John Walsh and Nancy Grace are conservative media icons.
If John Walsh and Nancy Grace can use the death of a loved one to propel themselves and their message into the spotlight, why are you guys so upset about the widows of 911 doing the same thing?
Oh yea, thats right.
Because they disagree with YOU.
June 8th, 2006 at 11:21 pmI’m a Christian, and she embarasses me! She gives Christians a bad name. I wish she’d shut up.
June 8th, 2006 at 11:30 pmIn response to Linda’s comments regarding my use of the term “military dead”. I certainly meant no disrespect to those killed in the line of duty. My father served in the Army during World War II, Korea, and two tours of duty in Viet Nam, and this is a term he used frequently. You seem quite sympathetic to the venomous ravings of Anne Coulter, but here in this blog, it seems you’re looking for a fight and scrutinizing every word used by the other participants. This is the first blog I’ve ever taken part in, and it will be my last. You really need to get a life.
June 9th, 2006 at 12:00 amLinda
Welcome to blogging. Don’t leave before you give it a try.
Linda’s just a wannabe smart troll, trying to act like a fencesitter who is “slightly” leaning to the right.
You didn’t offend anyone. My father and all of his brothers fought in WW2. My brothers were in Viet Nam, and you won’t here me crying about you saying what you said. She is a troll. A hack. Hell she’s probably Ann Coulter herself.
June 9th, 2006 at 12:10 amThink about it.
Ann Coulter is condeming the widows of 911 for using a painful and horrible loss in their life for what she claims is “lining their pockets”.
Meanwhile, Tom Delay, an ICON POWERHOUSE of the right wing is arrested, disgraced, forced to step down for using his SACRED DUTIES TO REPRESENT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE to line HIS pockets.
The HUBRIS is so thick, you could cut it with a knife.
June 9th, 2006 at 12:22 amThank you so much for the compliment, Flavius. I’m wiser than you know or could ever comprehend.
I must leave you now. But it’s been enlightening. It’s not every day that I get to actually interact with fools and idiots. And the ill informed. And Leslie? Just cool down before you blow a fuse. I’m just smarter than you and I realize you are threatened.
Flavius, you are just a sad little person, aren’t you?
God Bless Our Troops and Hail to the Chief!!!
June 9th, 2006 at 12:36 amI’m wiser than you know or could ever comprehend.
Comment by Linda — June 9, 2006 @ 12:36 am
Yea, you’re a legend in your own mind.
June 9th, 2006 at 12:43 amLike I said.
TROLL.
June 9th, 2006 at 12:43 amA man with a hump-backed uncle mustn’t make fun of another man’s cross-eyed aunt
Mark Twain
June 9th, 2006 at 12:53 amPlease accept my apology, Flavius. I am not a professional blogger and I usually save my opinions for intelligent conversations with my friends and family. It is commonplace in my household to hold riveting discussions and share our views on everything from religion and politics to ending world hunger and A.I.D.S……..please keep an open mind to all things and remember to be kind.
Best wishes to all, and to all a goodnight.
June 9th, 2006 at 1:16 amI knew I shouldn’t have checked in before bed. But alas, Linda has dangled a carrot, and I must bite. I’ve always found that those who continually declare their own intelligence are trying to convince themselves rather than others. Poor, clueless Linda. You do seem to have a grasp of the English language (maybe not such a grasp on reality though). After all, you are a renowned author of several books. Tell me, do they have text bubbles and caped heroes in them? I do believe you are a frustrated school teacher. Well….we’re not your students. It has been quite an experience here, and I bid you all a farewell. Maybe someday we can all celebrate our similarities rather than our differences.
June 9th, 2006 at 1:48 amIf you are not a liberal when you are young, you have no heart. If you are not conservative as an adult, you have no brain.
June 9th, 2006 at 2:16 amWhich is to say you save your arguments for people who agree with you, rather then actually testing them via arguing with those who don’t. And as to your “Wiser then thou” argument, someone once said something to me that I will now repeat to you “Only a fool calls himself (or in your case herself) wise.”
Look, a lot of people don’t agree with you and normally thats fair enough. There are cases where we get passionate about an issue, where we don’t see middle ground, and Ann Coulter is one of them. Her history is one of calling for the deaths of all liberals, and naming who should go first seriously gets to us. See you would like Michael Moore going on live television and saying “Lets kill all the Conservatives.” It isn’t a case of her being abrasive, hell I’m abrasive, it is a case of her constantly demonising anybody who disagrees with her. The Widows aren’t a isolated case. When we hear Ann Coulter’s name, it instantly pisses us off. In some of the posters here, this is a direct result of them having actually believed her at a point, and read up on the subjects she brings up only find that she was lying.
In some of us, it is because we spotted the lie early on. Her lies cost her more then her insults, because her lies showed her not to be a honest opponent, but simply a demigogue. If you substitute the word “Jew” for “liberal” in her books, you can really see the similarities between those books and Nazi propaganda and I shit thee not on this.
Our response to this is genuine disgust. It isn’t a case of us trying to make political hay, hell it isn’t even really a political viewpoint except that you Rightwingers seem to worship the ground she walks on, it is a case of us finding her statement above unacceptable. It would be a reflection on her alone if, the Right didn’t rise to her defense, and there isn’t anybody who gets the airtime she does, that stands as her equal opposite extreme.
Now, before you cristicise the left, go read some of Al Franken’s books, go read Tom Tommorow and ask yourself if any of it sounds familiar. Go listen to what liberals actually have to say, and actually challenge yourself to think about it. Don’t just go and expect a liberal to say “Down with Israel” because I for one am a Zionist if anything. Don’t assume that all liberals believe the 9/11 conspiracy, a lot of us don’t buy it and think it is stupid, I mean, why waste the planes? Don’t assume that even one of us, hell even I, can speak for the whole. We aren’t like that, we don’t have a unified vision of a nonexistant past we desperately want to go back to, we don’t want the sixties, we want a better 2020s.
Oh, and don’t make grand claims. “I am a history professor” or “I am a published author” or whatever, these don’t make your case any stronger. They make you look like a not-particularly good liar.
June 9th, 2006 at 2:51 amre 711: Linda, I thought it was the other way around; have you lost your mind???
June 9th, 2006 at 2:52 amP.S. Linda, Oh well, we are in IT now, so we may as well support the BRAVE FIGHTING MEN AND WOMEN; this is the trap that the bush admin planted; like a laywer(can you say, Ann Coulter)
June 9th, 2006 at 2:56 amTypo; I meant “LIAR” sorry… Oh wait, I’m not sorry
June 9th, 2006 at 2:58 am715 posts here . Flavius bungholius rambles on and attacks like a five year old .does your mommy know you are on her computer Flav?
June 9th, 2006 at 8:47 am224 personal attacks.
189 instances of calling anybody that does not agree with liberaldom a nazi.
321 instances of using sexual inuendo to imply Coulter isn’t a woman.
More misspellings than I care to see which brings me to my next point.
45 instances of grammar fascists being pendantic and condescending.
102 instances of Flava-Flava, aka Flavius, reincarnated ancient Roman god of gay love and outdoor plumbing proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that leftards are persistent in proving their mental deficiency- priceless…oops wrong commercial.
YET NO ONE IN ANY POST HAS PROVEN ANN COULTER WRONG.
Chris
That is because Ann Coulter hasn’t presented an argument. She has presented an assertion and it not for us to prove her wrong, it is for her to prove herself right.
And oh, by the way
We keep on posting it, and you keep on ignoring it, wanker.
June 9th, 2006 at 9:21 amOH YOU HURT MY FEELINGS NOW BRUCIE. Wanker eh? methings you are the wanker ( as most libtards are). OK some of what you speculate on MIGHT be correct. Of course the speculation about the husbands divorcing their bitch wives migh be specualtive but still the fact remains that these broads did most certainly benefit from their husband’s deaths and become shills for the the left wingnut side. Coming from Joisey they most likely were liberals before the attacks of 9/11 but the fact remains that the tragedy gave these libs an opportunity to gain monetarily and use their position as victims to attack anyone not liberal enough to blame Bush & co. for ANYTHING from 9/11 to their PMSing.
June 9th, 2006 at 9:44 amYou claim a littany of problems and deficiencies; true but Bush had only been in office a short time when we were attacked. If Clinton had spent less times whoring and having to placate his bitchy wife and other left wingnut special interest groups maybe, just maybe he could have foreseen some problems.
The fact remains and still does, coulters points is that once the Joisey Gurls and nutjobs like Sheehan come over to the dark side that is liberalism they become mouthpieces for the attack Bush crowd. Sheehan has become accosted by the hard socialist left. The Joiseys have become the chheerleading section for Swillary Clinton and the NY Times ( that bastion fo Truth and impartiality) glowingly report on it all.
The bottom line is once ANYBODY shows the slightest inclination to have a legtimate debate over anything they get accosted and assimilated like a drunk tattooed girl in a biker bar.
My premise is that all this criticism over Bush and folks like Coulter is a cover for a deeper and immature anger over the Republicans and the right wing coming to power after 40 years of liberals and democrats having their way with America. The left in this country cannot cope with being tossed out of power. They do not know how to be the minority party. they know how to be the party of minorities but not be in the minority. They really need to get used to it. Until the democrats learn to not pander to the lunatic fringe left they will continue to be in the minority.
Oh Brucie you so prove my point about libtards being sexually fixated by pulling the “wanker” card. If the cruel hit had not come from somebody as astute and articulate as yourself i just might be offended.
Chris
You do realise, that Ann Coulter is actually taking profits of this book? Oh, and while you are making this assertion that these “Joisey Girls” (Boy how I love how you Rightwingers love to label, it really substitutes for thinking ey?) are profiting from this exposure, how about actually proving it?
Oh, and you are a wanker, that is because you are more in love with yourself, for devoted to yourself, more interested in yourself, then anybody else. Being a wanker, is not just about jerking off, it is about making love with oneself, and that is all the love you have.
June 9th, 2006 at 10:34 amHypocrisy brucie hypocrisy, now be a good boy and go back and read your little post and then tell me if you can find your hypocrisy . hint- calling somebody a wanker( on my feelings, sniff being called a “labeler, gasp ! ) then chastising for somebody else bsing a labeler well that just proves my point. Go ahead Brucie join the ranks of other famous leftards like Michael.Moore Ward “heap big injun” Churchill and Teddy “chappaquiddick” Kennedy.
June 9th, 2006 at 11:20 amthe small minds with uncommensurately big mouths on the left never cease to amaze me with their absolute ability to define the word irony with their obvious inability to look at themselves and see their hypocrisy.
yet still no one proves Ann Coulter wrong.
Chris
Go, well, carry on as usual.
June 9th, 2006 at 11:24 amOh, and it isn’t for us to prove Ann Coulter wrong, it is for Ann Coulter to prove herself right. Something which is desperately difficult for her to do, in light of the fact that she so frequently, tells lies. Outright lies. Lies which cannot be called anything less then lies.
Of course if you want to take the word of a liar, that’s your affair.
June 9th, 2006 at 11:26 am……..please keep an open mind to all things and remember to be kind.
Best wishes to all, and to all a goodnight.
Comment by Linda — June 9, 2006 @ 1:16 am
If you’re looking for tea and crumpets and pleasantries, I suggest you get tickets to Oprah.
But don’t think for two seconds you’re going to guilt me, or anyone else in here into playing by your rules, or letting you set the tone. I watched liberals let you guys guilt them into being the “nice guys” while your kind ripped them a new one.
No one here is going to apologize for having their game face on.
And if you didn’t come to suit up, then get on the sidelines and keep out of the way.
June 9th, 2006 at 12:18 pmYET NO ONE IN ANY POST HAS PROVEN ANN COULTER WRONG.
Comment by Miss Chris — June 9, 2006 @ 8:47 am
Wrong about what? She didn’t promote any theory. She just insulted and ruthlessly attacked a bunch of women who lost their loved ones in perhaps one of the most horrible manners a person could imagine.
I don’t have to prove her wrong. She is wrong. I’m just here to demonstrate what grade A chumps you peabrains are for buying her book.
She plays you guys like a 50 cent plastic banjo.
June 9th, 2006 at 12:23 pmAnn Coulter HAS proven herself right and as usual all her detractors have to do to prove themselves wrong is to open their mouths. Nobody here yet (or anywhere else) has provern her wrong.
June 9th, 2006 at 12:25 pmFlavis colostomus you are just soooo Macho. Do you even read your posts before or after you submit them to see how silly you sound?
You guys eat up her babblings.
Shes like a tent preacher at a trailer park.
June 9th, 2006 at 12:26 pmNobody here yet (or anywhere else) has provern her wrong.
Comment by Miss Chris — June 9, 2006 @ 12:25 pm
Wrong about WHAT dimwit?
She’s not writing a thesis there you know (course to you it probably is).
Its a book of foul insults and brainwash for all you good little goosesteppers.
Wheres the scientific theorum she presents in it that you want me to prove wrong?
June 9th, 2006 at 12:35 pmOr maybe you thought her classifying JEWS as CHRISTIANS was “scientific”, LOL.
Ok, you want me to prove her wrong? Ok. There. I just did.
In fact, I just proved she a blithering idiot.
Every religious scholar in the field still has milk coming out of their noses on that one.
Thats funny stuff.
June 9th, 2006 at 12:37 pmJune 9th, 2006 at 12:46 pm
ok Mr. Flavius I have some newfound respect for you quoting Sagan. But I hope in your objectivity you would realize that Sagans statement is bifurcated in the fact that it could absolutely define either side of the right/left debates on just about anything.
June 9th, 2006 at 12:57 pmHonest debate is no longer done because both sides have elevated the hatred factor to unseen before levels. there is no dicourse only venom.
I have to look at who benefits by all this division in our country. Whose agenda and/or wallet is furthered by our bickering and ultimately our inability to come to some kind of rational solution nevermind consensus. Sad, very sad that this country has devolved into fighting that most likely will result in the Balkanization of America.
Who is the blowhard now?
-“You want to be careful not to become just a blowhard,” she said in The Washington Post on October 16, 1998.
It would seem Ms Coulter has turned the tables on herself with her attack on the 9/11 widows. I have never read such vitriolic trash in my life as spews from Coulter’s mouth. May she rest in pieces.
June 9th, 2006 at 1:03 pmI’ve read the Demon-Haunted world several times, and its clear from the book, that Sagans statement is directed towards your clan.
The entire book in fact is directed towards your clan. It is the debunking of religious dogma in light of scientific reality.
He shines a bright light on the ultra conservative religious in this country, who make policy, and war, because of their “faith”.
Read the book if you haven’t, but I warn you. Its a tough read for conservatives.
Coulter couldn’t get through the first chapter.
June 9th, 2006 at 1:16 pmGODLESS title “hijacked” by Ann Coulter: Christian-right celebrity and author to release book on 6/6/6 which conflicts with established book by the same name. Atheist author Drew Stepek prepares for literary “Holy War.”
Los Angeles, CA, May 16th, 2006
Author Drew Stepek, whose book entitled GODLESS has been registered with the Library of Congress since 2001 and who has owned the popular web destination http://www.godless.com since 2000, has just been informed that Ann Coulter will release a book with the title GODLESS on June 6th, 2006.
Although principle dissuades Drew Stepek from taking legal action against Coulter, he feels Coulter’s book perverts and sucks the love out of religion and the open space of the Godless, which is free of prejudices and the burdens of myth. Stepek’s book is about the death of God in our society and how it leads an individual down a path of self-destruction, whereas Coulter’s book is a stab at the Democratic and Liberal society of the Godless.
“If I wrote a book called BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN for the purpose of promoting hatred of gay people,” Stepek says citing the popular gay novel, “I think that it would represent a perverted violation of the original literary work.”
Drew Stepek’s GODLESS (ISBN# 0978602412) will be released as a second edition by ALPHAR publishing on June 6th, 2006, the same day as Coulter’s GODLESS (ISBN# 1400054206) is being released by Crown Forum. Both books will be available in bookstores and online. Although an underground success in atheist and eating disorder communities, Stepek has never before officially released GODLESS to the mass public. For more information about Stepek’s novel, look to http://www.godless.com.
ALPHAR will proceed with releasing Drew’s important book despite Ms. Coulter’s attempt to pervert and ride on Drew’s patient career. “The power of an idea (or God) is revealed by its fruits,” says Dr. Thomas Moore of ALPHAR. “We have been working productively with Drew. Stepek since early last winter, His purpose isn’t politically or opportunistically motivated. He has been with the title GODLESS for a very long time.”
June 9th, 2006 at 2:22 pmJust a short comment for my little friend, Flavius. I am certainly not trying to guilt you into anything, little one. You are what you are. Not my problem. And as far as having my “game face on” get real Beavis, (or is that Butthead?) I think you’ve already been ripped a new one and you’re bleeding all over the place.
June 9th, 2006 at 2:42 pmI think I’ll just go have my tea and crumpets now, Idiot. You bore me.
Yea? You think you’ve “ripped me a new one” TrollLinda?
Pray tell do show us WHERE.
Please provide post numbers, as all I see is a another inbred big mouth troll, who hasn’t said one truthful or coherent thing since she (it) came in here.
Or did you already forget that I exposed your little “”I’m not political I just want to talk for a minute” line of crapola?
I smelled you out like a polecat in a henhouse, and you can’t stand it.
But please do keep coming back for more, trying to get the last word in, cause believe me loser, I’m all ears.
Say something smart.
I dare you.
June 9th, 2006 at 2:50 pmBTW, if the word “inbred” confuses you, (I know that word was forbidden around the trailer growing up), it means that your mother is also your aunt, and your father is also your uncle.
Hope that helps :D
June 9th, 2006 at 2:52 pmAnd just so we all have this very clear……”inbred” would also mean that you are your own Grandpa!
June 9th, 2006 at 3:11 pmTry to figure that one out Flavie……and yes, you probably are “all ears” being “inbred” and all that, that implies. Me thinks inbreeding runs rampant in Flavie’s family.
Now go rant some more, “Deliverance Boy”
LOL, hell you’re not even a witty troll are you?
That was lame, even for a Coulter troll.
If you need some help next time thinking up some fresh insults instead saying using mine to say, “I know you are but what am I”. let me know greaseball.
I got a million of them.
June 9th, 2006 at 3:17 pm715 posts here . Flavius bungholius rambles on and attacks like a five year old .does your mommy know you are on her computer Flav?
224 personal attacks.
189 instances of calling anybody that does not agree with liberaldom a nazi.
321 instances of using sexual inuendo to imply Coulter isn’t a woman.
More misspellings than I care to see which brings me to my next point.
45 instances of grammar fascists being pendantic and condescending.
102 instances of Flava-Flava, aka Flavius, reincarnated ancient Roman god of gay love and outdoor plumbing proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that leftards are persistent in proving their mental deficiency- priceless…oops wrong commercial.
LOL One of Chris’ better posts.
June 9th, 2006 at 3:17 pmOh looky.
The knights of the “mound” table are here to defend their headmistresses honor once more, LOL.
Hey SCAT, like I told you yesterday TURDWEASAL, at least you picked the right name for yourself.
June 9th, 2006 at 3:21 pmBut can’t you do something about the flies?
June 9th, 2006 at 3:22 pmBy the way, you’re welcome Flav.
June 9th, 2006 at 3:26 pmI am commenting on every single post Mr. Deliverance Boy has made. He is a woman hating, man loving wacko. So take another one up the — and squeal like a pig, Flavie!
June 9th, 2006 at 3:27 pmOh thats brilliant Lindatroll, just brilliant.
You think that one up all by your lonesome did you? Or did you get the family to stop watching Hee Haw long enough to help?
June 9th, 2006 at 3:34 pmYesterday Linda wasn’t a “troll” just a so called wife of a war veteran who was “concerned” and wanted to make a fair and reasonable comment.
Here she is just one short day later (still here I might add for someone whose just wife of a war vet who wanted to make a point).
I am commenting on every single post Mr. Deliverance Boy has made. He is a woman hating, man loving wacko. So take another one up the — and squeal like a pig, Flavie!
Comment by Linda — June 9, 2006 @ 3:27 pm
But oh no, you’re not troll.
BAWAH HA HA HA HA
June 9th, 2006 at 3:39 pmIn fact she’s the worst kind of troll.
She’s the kind that too much of a coward and a liar, to come in as what she is. A big fat troll.
At least SHI…er, I mean SCAT doesn’t seem to employ any subterfuge, but you TrollLinda, are as low as they go.
And you’re not even a particularly witty one to boot. What a let down.
Guess you guys are scrapin the dregs now, huh?
June 9th, 2006 at 3:50 pmThink hard Trolllady.
I know its hard to keep up with my pistolwhipping tempo, but if you grit your teeth and squeeze real hard, you should pop out at least one good comeback.
Course you might blow a gasket too, but thats the risk.
Please try as your slowwitted responses are a drain on my ebb and flow.
Feels like I’m debating my grandmother.
June 9th, 2006 at 3:57 pmYou are absolutely right Flavius. I came upon this blog quite by accident yesterday and I wanted to make a “fair and reasonable” comment on what was being said on the subject of Ann Coulter. I felt this subject deserved a respectful and heartfelt comment from the other side of the coin. A little perspective.
I am the widow of a war veteran. And this cut throat, hateful banter dishonors him and all those who have fought and died for their Country. I am disgusted with myself. That I allowed myself to sink as low as the likes of Flavius and all the others who refuse to look at both sides of the issue.
Now I really will leave you all to your venomous spewing. Shame on us all.
God Bless Our Troops!
June 9th, 2006 at 3:59 pmMaybe you guys should send the queen bee herself in here to defend her honor.
After all she couldn’t do much worse than this current band of assclowns.
In fact, tell Frau Coulter that Flavius Worfeus is at her service.
In fact, it will be my pleasure.
June 9th, 2006 at 4:00 pmI am the widow of a war veteran. And this cut throat, hateful banter dishonors him and all those who have fought and died for their Country.
Comment by Fat TrollLinda — June 9, 2006 @ 3:59 pm
Really? The widow of a war veteran? Really?
Wow you’ve been truthful so far, guess I should believe you now, right? LMFAO.
June 9th, 2006 at 4:03 pmOne question though Frau SchwartzWidow,
Why yesterday did you tell us you were the “wife” of a War Veteran, and today you are a “Widow” of a war Veteran?
I guess he died last night, huh?
June 9th, 2006 at 4:08 pmI came upon this blog quite by accident yesterday and I wanted to make a “fair and reasonable†comment
Comment by SchwartzWidow — June 9, 2006 @ 3:59 pm
And we’re still waiting for you to make one.
June 9th, 2006 at 4:10 pmAnd this cut throat, hateful banter dishonors him and all those who have fought and died for their Country.
Comment by SchwartzWidow — June 9, 2006 @ 3:59 pm
You’re right. The cut throat hateful banter the queen of venom, Ann Coulter just published, dishonors all those who have fought and died for their country.
Well said oh trollish one.
Well said.
June 9th, 2006 at 4:14 pmThat I allowed myself to sink as low as the likes of Flavius and all the others who refuse to look at both sides of the issue.
Comment by SchwartzWidow — June 9, 2006 @ 3:59 pm
And????
Come on you left that sentence dangling.
I want to hear whatever stupid thing you were going to say about how you sunk down to the likes of me.
Come on man, don’t leave me hanging like this. :D
June 9th, 2006 at 4:17 pmNow I really will leave you all to your venomous spewing.
Comment by Linda — June 9, 2006 @ 3:59 pm
Yea?
Well ok then.
But don’t let the door hit you on the way out.
June 9th, 2006 at 4:19 pmLets see. At 3;27, I’m not a troll Linda said;
I am commenting on every single post Mr. Deliverance Boy has made.
But by 3:59, I’m wish I weren’t a troll Linda said;
Now I really will leave you all to your venomous spewing.
That didn’t take long.
June 9th, 2006 at 4:26 pmIt is real simple folks…those who can’t bloviate…aka Rush the oxycodone addict…Bill the sex preditor O’Liely…and Ann the hate spewing reichwinger…if (s)he really could do anything but attack with the slimest and lowest cuts (s)he can think of ‘…..it would….must cost a lot for all the pills ans surgery to look as anorexic as it does…..
June 9th, 2006 at 4:42 pmBTW in the first week of Mann’s book for sale why is it 25-50% off list everywhere I see it…one reichwing book site had it 3 for $1….must be REAL good to be marked down THAT far already
June 9th, 2006 at 4:48 pmPoor Poor (M)anny the wanna be Nazi can’t even figger out where to go to vote…and it even thinks it can “intellegentally” comment on anything but spittle
It was hatched a couple of decades too late.
June 9th, 2006 at 4:53 pmToo bad Ann didn’t have a falafel, then it and O’liely could runn off together…maybe on a deserted Island with no cable or phone service
But do not think about any offspring if ya do not want nightmares
June 9th, 2006 at 4:55 pmReally Clif?
3 for $1?
I’m surprised its that high. :|
June 9th, 2006 at 4:56 pmYes. I did state that I am the wife of a Military Officer. When I made my first post, I did not feel comfortable sharing my own experience with his death. In a post made much later I did make the remark that I have lost a loved one to War. It is true, and I will not speak of it further. As I told you once before, Flavius, it dishonors him. And I will not continue to do this with you.
Make what you want of anything I have to say. Rant and rave, and carry on. But in doing so you only remind me of the real reasons why I dislike talking to far left lunatic radicals. You shame yourself. And I will not be party to this any longer. I have tried to make you see the rational side of things, but you must always sink so low. It is the banter of fools.
I am sorry I ever took the time to speak my mind on this blog. Your hideous remarks are so putrid and vile. I feel sorry for you, and I truly mean that. I am not being facetious.
Take some time to think, Flavius. There is too much hatred and bile in this world as it is…..let us not add to that.
June 9th, 2006 at 5:00 pmI pray that we can rise above such things as this………….
Well worf lights and rent must be paid
June 9th, 2006 at 5:01 pmYes. I did state that I am the wife of a Military Officer. When I made my first post, I did not feel comfortable sharing my own experience with his death. In a post made much later I did make the remark that I have lost a loved one to War.
Comment by Schwartzwidow — June 9, 2006 @ 5:00 pm
LOL, so let me see if I’ve got this straight.
Yesterday you proclaimed that you were the “wife” of a war veteran.
Today you proclaim you are the “widow” of a war veteran.
Now, after proclaiming your LAST and FINAL post several times, you’re back, to proclaim loudly that you are the “widow” of a war veteran, so you can defend Ann Coulters attack on the widows of war veterans and 911 for using their status as widows to make a political statement.
LMFAO.
Stop you’re killin me Widowmaker.
You just can’t BUY hubris like this in stores lol.
June 9th, 2006 at 5:07 pmLinda posts just like MA…same quotes to tell all us mere lortals how intelligent (s)he is…and same changing family history…hows the weather in SD MA?
June 9th, 2006 at 5:13 pmWell, I’d say she just gave me game, set and match.
Think about it.
She is in here, proclaiming that Ann Coulter is right, in that the widows of war and 911 should NOT use their status as widows when making an argument for their side.
In so doing, she is proclaiming repeatedly that SHE is a “war widow” in an effort to bolster her argument for her side.
LOL, you could cut the hubris with a knife.
Game.
Set.
Match.
June 9th, 2006 at 5:20 pmCourse not that I believe for two seconds she is really a “war widow”.
She started out lying and I doubt she stopped there.
June 9th, 2006 at 5:23 pmSame MO as Mighty Afro that is why I thought it might be it
June 9th, 2006 at 5:29 pmAnd mee thinks you could be quite right.
Quite right.
June 9th, 2006 at 5:37 pmYou’ve got it all wrong, Flavius. My status as a widow has nothing to do with the 9/11 widows, but I can see where you think it would. This is not about “me”, it is about making a point that ALL citizens of this Country deserve to be treated equally. I’m sure you must see the rationale in that!
June 9th, 2006 at 5:44 pmI guess everyone in this blog are here for one purpose only, and that is to make fun of other’s, to disrespect other’s, to try to make themselves feel important. At the expense of good and decent people.
I ask you now, Flavius. Why were the families of the victims at the Pentagon not compensated for their deaths? Is that fair? No one will answer this question for me, and I posed it yesterday. Why were the families of the first World Trade Center Bombing in 1996 not compensated? I ask you these questions not as Ann Coulter would, but for myself. I think we set a very bad precedent when we started paying money to the families of 9/11 victims. Where does it stop, or even more importantly, why did it start at all? Who gets to decide the value of life?
BTW “Linda” if you are a actiuve duty soldiers widow…then you recieved the SGLI which is now $400,000..and a survivor dependant monthy payment…along with life medical thru tricare prime…so you would also know those who work in the pentagon have the SAME benifits package….you KNEW this right….
quit being SOOOO dishonest
June 9th, 2006 at 5:46 pmJune 9th, 2006 at 5:47 pm
Well, I just couldn’t resist another peek in here and WOW have things deteriorated. It seems the far right and the far left have collided. I believe both are in the minority, and most of the rest of us fall somewhere in the moderate area. I consider myself “somewhat” liberal, but that does not mean I walk in goosestep with ALL liberals.
I believe in the death penalty (when incontrovertible proof of guilt exists). My religious beliefs tell me abortion is wrong, yet I am in favor of a woman’s right to choose. What right do I have to impose my religious beliefs on someone else. One of the basics of our constituion is the separation of church and state. I believe in gun control to a degree. I believe law abiding citizens should be willing to make proper applications and wait adequate periods of time to obtain firearms. I certainly do not see the need for automatic weapons that can blow the heads off of 30 people in a clip.
Religiously, I do not believe in gay marriage, but again, I do not feel we need to legislate what constitutes a marriage. That is for me to determine on my own within my own heart. Why should it bother me if my gay neighbors want to become wife and wife or husband and husband. They’re not trying to recruit me into it. Live and let live.
I wholeheartedly supported President Bush going into Afghanistan after the 9/11 attacks (so not all liberals are pacifists). The terrorists trained there and Osama Bin Laden was there. There were no Iraqi’s in the attacks. They were actually mostly Saudi’s (our so-called allies). However, I feel we’ve gone into Iraq under false pretenses. First, according to the Bush administration, it was for our own self-preservation from the WMDs that were supposed to be hidden, then it was to bring down the cruel ruler of the country, Sadam Hussein, now it’s to bring democracy to their country. Are we kidding ourselves? Bring democracy to a region that is blanketed in theocracy. I doubt it will ever succeed. And who appointed us the world’s police. There are many, many, cruel and savage leaders throughout the world, and if we’re going to take them out as well, we’ll be needing a much much larger military than we currently have. Frankly, I’m not willing to send any of my loved ones to serve.
My problems with the “Christian-Right” is that they exhibit more hatred toward people than any “christian” attitudes. I do not think they know the meaning of the word “Christian”.
So…. call me a liberal, and I wear that label proudly. I believe our government should help its citizens who are less fortunate than others, not give the biggest tax breaks to the wealthiest segment of the population…if that’s liberal, call me liberal.
June 9th, 2006 at 5:54 pmLinda, I know no one here will say it so I will at the risk of sounding patronizing. Thank you for the sacrifices you and your husband made. You husband most obviously made the ultimate sacrifice for his country and for all of us. My heartelf condolonces.
June 9th, 2006 at 5:58 pmI find it ironic and sad that this a debate about Ann Coulter criticizing the Jersey Girls and the leftards here go nutso but have absolutley no qualms about attacking you. Sick and sad. It further shows the hypocrisy that is the true trademark of the left. They have no problems mentioning trailer parks and Deliverance and being the most racist, sexist disgusting and loathsome hypocrites in history. they wonder why most of American hates them witha seething rage . They wonder why rush & Ann & Hannity and Savage attack them witha cheering chorus. They just do not get it and never will. Liberalism really is a mental disorder and a true sickness that is destroying this great country.
You left winger should really stop and read what you have written here for all to see. You are a disgrace to this country and to the men who fought and died to give you the right to make fools of yourselves. You should be ashamed but I know that you will just revel in your sickness and try to destroy everything that was and is good about this country.
Ok Clif….Here’s the real deal. Back then SGLI was $250,000. And an Officer’s wife would receive benefits commenserate with the rank of her husband at the time of death. And if you think the medical is a “benefit” try using Champus/Tricare with a supplemental and see what you get. It’’s worse than being on Welfare. And I do believe that $250,000. is quite different than the million plus dollars that the victims families of 9/11 received. My husband had to pay, PAY, for that SGLI. Money was taken out of his Military pay for this…..no one gave him anything. But he gave his life.
June 9th, 2006 at 6:03 pmI cannot recall exactly, but my husband received something along the line of $150 a month for hazardous duty pay, while in Country in 1990. He was classified as a D.I.P. when he first got over there in Sept. 1990. Of course you know what that means, correct? Now I know what I have received each month in benefits due to my husbands death, and it in no way compares to what these 9/11 widows have received, and my husband was an Officer and a Gentleman.
And given a “life” expectancy of 30 years the widows of those killed in the pentagon will easily exceed $1,000,000 TOTAL..especially with the essentially free medical care they will recieve…my mother gets it after my father a 28 year veteran passed away…I get VA since I am a 100% disabled Gulf War veteran, members of the military always have been compensated….only the repugs like Reagan in the early 80’s and the currenty idiot in chief tries to take this away
June 9th, 2006 at 6:05 pmPost 774 comment by Chris:
Thank you Chris, from the bottom of my heart. You brought tears to my eyes and made me proud. You are a man of intergity and I salute you. God Bless you! And thank you for understanding and being so very kind.
An Officer’s Wife to the End.
June 9th, 2006 at 6:07 pmYes linda you rhusband paid 16.00 a month for 250,000 benifit LIKE everyother soldier…Linda and given the fact you recieve a monthy stipend each month you will approach the about 1,000,000 the survivors of 9-11 got….quit being so dishonest and crying so much …something MAnn might take you to task if you weren’t defending the indefensible…a chicken-hawk bitch decrying others los…and the sacrifice of many it can not even think about making
June 9th, 2006 at 6:10 pmJune 9th, 2006 at 6:12 pm
You see LINDA …I for one do not see what coulter wrote having much worth…I put her in the same catagory of Bill The lier O”Liely who slandered the WW2 veterans who were MURDERED by SS troops by saying the American soldiers murdered the Nazi’s…not ONCE but TWICE…then Fox tried to change the transcript…then when they werte caught they had to change it back but Bill stiull mainmtains he was misquoteed…INSTEAD of simply appologising to those he slanders…just like Coulter….no HONOR there…..no Moral fiber…otherwise they wouldn’t even think the thoughts let along speak them……….
June 9th, 2006 at 6:16 pmClif, you have the audacity to call me, the wife of a deceased military officer, killed in action, a “chicken hawk bitch”. I wish my husband was alive now, he would rip your head off and shit down your neck. That, by the way, is an old miltary saying. But as far as you got was the Girl Scouts, obviously.
June 9th, 2006 at 6:20 pmShame on you!
Don’t let her buffalo you Clif.
She didn’t loose anyone in any war.
Think about it.
She said her husband fought in Viet Nam AND the First Gulf war.
We didn’t loose that many soldiers in the first gulf war, and most were to friendly fire, so this puts her in a very, very, very small circle.
You really think shes one of those widows?
I don’t.
Not for one damn minute.
June 9th, 2006 at 6:20 pmClif, you have the audacity to call me, the wife of a deceased military officer, killed in action, a “chicken hawk bitchâ€. I wish my husband was alive now, he would rip your head off and shit down your neck.
Comment by SheRa, Queen of the Amazon — June 9, 2006 @ 6:20 pm
BAWAH HA HA HA HO HO HOLY FREAKIN MOLY …..
Now THATS funny.
June 9th, 2006 at 6:21 pmYou Clif, and Flavius sound mentally ill. Sad little mental cripples with nothing to do but bash women.
June 9th, 2006 at 6:22 pmWorfeus I knew a few people who were killed…and will grant a modicam of truth to Linda…but where is the HONOR in what Coulter is doing?
That is what I want Linda to answer…O’Liely has none and he shows it…now MAnn is doing the same….where is the Honor…I was taught you do not slander those who gave their lives NEVER..and Ann by slandering the wives..and hinting their husbands might have been going to divorce their husbands…would be like saying just before LINDA’s husband was killed he thought about divorcing her…which is way out of bounds…but Linda defends Ann in her slander
June 9th, 2006 at 6:25 pmNow she’s crying. Sorry Felonius, those crocidile tears aren’t gonna cut it.
We know you’re tougher than that An…er I mean Linda.
June 9th, 2006 at 6:25 pmHey didn’t you say you were leaving about 40 posts back or something?
Don’t let us keep you Dolly Madison.
I’m sure you’ve got a flag to knit for your husbands coffin or something don’t you?
June 9th, 2006 at 6:27 pmLINDA i did not call YOU a chicken-hawk bitch….but MAnn coulter a chicken-hawk bitch…unless you nare also Ann Coulter in desquise….
June 9th, 2006 at 6:28 pmIf you’re so damn smart, Flavius. Or whoever you are. Check it out and see who got killed and where in the 1st Gulf War. And scud missles are not called “friendly fire” you ass of the world!
June 9th, 2006 at 6:29 pmOf course you’re probably an Iraqi sympathizer with no job, otherwise you wouldn’t be sitting at your computer all day and night.
I have a good reason to be home. Do you?
Remembver Linda I am a veteran but you have probl;ems with comprehension…I called the one who was slandering survivors of tragedy and refuses to offer itself up for service but advocates others go and kill or be killed …Like it does…so unless you are Mann Coulter your did noit get slandered by me try reading and thinking next time
June 9th, 2006 at 6:32 pmBTW Linda if you husband was an OFFICER and he served in both Vietnam and Gulf War then his service streached almost 20 years so he must have been a major or Lt Coronel which means your getting a better thasn average monthy stipend…if your husband had been a PFC then I could see your crying about the small stipend….
June 9th, 2006 at 6:35 pmA. what I do for a living is nunya.
B. So if your husband was killed by a SCUD, that narrows you down to 1 of 147 possible candidates.
If you’re really an Author, then you should have no problem revealing your true name here so we can all verify your amazing claims, and I will certainly recant my contestation of your loss.
Of course, you won’t do that. You’ll come up with some reason not to reveal yourself, even though you’ve written 3 books.
Tell us the name of just ONE of the books.
June 9th, 2006 at 6:38 pmI apologize to you Clif. I realize I misinterpreted you “chicken hawk bitch” statement and I will take you at face value, so to speak.
June 9th, 2006 at 6:38 pmAnd you know something, I agree with you. I will answer your question on Ann Coulter. I said it yesterday. Coulter is abrasive and harsh and her message is sometimes lost in all this harsh talk. I wish she would calm the hell down and just speak her mind without the mean comments.
But my point has always been that EVERYONE or NO ONE should be compensated for these types of deaths and I do feel that the far left is taking advantage of these women in their grief.
You are right. I was taught the same principles. We must never slander those who gave their lives for our Country.
Flavius is just mean.
Just one.
June 9th, 2006 at 6:39 pmFlavius is just mean
Comment by Linda Coulter — June 9, 2006 @ 6:38 pm
Uh, I got news for you there slappy.
The women you’re in here defending isn’t exactly Shirley Temple.
June 9th, 2006 at 6:42 pmok……I meant to log off and not post again.
Comment by Linda — June 8, 2006 @ 8:38 pm
Best wishes to all, and to all a goodnight.
Comment by Linda — June 9, 2006 @ 1:16 am
I am sorry I ever took the time to speak my mind on this blog.
Comment by Linda — June 9, 2006 @ 5:00 pm
And I will not be party to this any longer.
Comment by Linda — June 9, 2006 @ 5:00 pm
June 9th, 2006 at 6:47 pmI keep telling you people. It isn’t about ME. It’s about the survivors of the Oklahoma CIty Bombing and the 1st World Trade Center Bombing, etc. It ain’t about me guys!!
June 9th, 2006 at 6:48 pmI sucked up my pain 15 years ago. No squirters here.
Now will you, for God’s sake, get the POINT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jesus!
Linda it is not the fact that those on the right like Coulter and O’Liely say the things…but they think them and see no probvlem in saying them…that is what galls me…they are always right and can not admit one mistake…like Bush did …his mistake was saying somethiong harshly…not making sure the mission in Iraq was important enough to properly plan it and the follow on to combat…which every oifficer even a second LT is taught…make sure you are prepared to consolidate on the objective and prepare for a possible counter attack…that is taught at thje platoon level in ROTC and OBC…but5 those who sent the soldiers to this fiasco FAILED a basic requirementr thatr your husband would have required of the greenest @nd LT fresh out of OBC to do….THAT GALLS me…because about 2000 GOOD soldiers and sons and dsughters of this country are dead because of their failures…not to mention the over 17,000 who will live with the scars of battle for life do to the failures to plan properly on the part of those who are supposed to do it right …
Ann is crying about the wrong problem…and the wrong people…but (s)he has a book to sell to those who wish the facts would just go away
Thus the reichwing moonbats defend her bloviating because (s)he has the right to do so…instead of asking what would be the moral and honorable thing to do?
June 9th, 2006 at 6:51 pmLINDA with your “qualifiers” you made it about you
June 9th, 2006 at 6:53 pmI never said I was a soldier Clif. My husband was…….I do know how to apologize and correct a wrong, whereas I fail to see anyone else on this blog doing the same.
You may see me as a reichwing moonbat, but that just isn’t so…..suppose I did qualify…….how terrible is that really?
Carry on!
June 9th, 2006 at 7:00 pmThis is the last post I am going to write today
Comment by Linda — June 8, 2006 @ 6:56 pm
ok……I meant to log off and not post again. I did.
Comment by Linda — June 8, 2006 @ 8:38 pm
Oh, Flavius…please. Why must you be so angry?
Comment by Linda — June 8, 2006 @ 8:57 pm
You make a good point, Leslie.
Comment by Linda — June 8, 2006 @ 10:53 pm
Please accept my apology, Flavius. I am not a professional blogger
Comment by Linda — June 9, 2006 @ 1:16 am
June 9th, 2006 at 7:01 pmWelll…i like her, even if she can be a bit extreme. People think she’s being disrespectful by calling these women “broads”…and maybe she is, but the wives who are taking their husbands deaths and trying to gain political advantages are more disrespectful than anything Anne Coulter has ever done.
June 9th, 2006 at 7:03 pmOh look. Another fan of Coulters just happened to find their way here, who just happens to say the exact same thing that Linda is saying.
Who’dve thunk it?
June 9th, 2006 at 7:08 pmLinda can’t you see the problem is not what a few women fron NJ who lost their husbands say….but the fact that we were rushed into this war…and it was criminaly poorly planned with absolutely no plan to follow on to combat operations…even though the US Army was collage wrote such a plan in Feb 2003…but those ayt the top ignored it because each had alterior motives which blocked proper military planning and operations…thus the soldiers have been carring the brunt of the load for the criminal inco,p[etence of the leadership of this war….and noiw the war in Afghanistan is slipping away…the Taliban is making a comeback there because they DID not finish the battle and have a plan for after the attack.
That is what is wrong…the losses we havew suffered because of those who are at the top have NO expierence and attack those who do if they critise the incompetence. Like Ann is attacking some who see some of the same things…Ann is part of the problem right now and (s)he is enabling those at the top creating more war widows…just like you
June 9th, 2006 at 7:08 pmGood think the Colonel here came in to reinforce your exact point Linda.
Amazing he just happened to wander in right at this moment, now that the Threads moved off the main page and all.
Imagine the odds.
June 9th, 2006 at 7:10 pmOk, well Clif believes you’re a war widow, or at least he’s giving you the benefit of the doubt.
I on the other hand, will wait for you to expose one of the titles of the THREE books you’ve written, to validate your claim that your husband was among the 147 men killed in combat during the gulf, yours by a SCUD.
I mean, that will be an easy claim to prove.
Though an odd one.
I mean, you’re in here supporting Ann Coulter, who wrote that women who lost husbands in both the current Iraq war or 911 should keep their mouths shut, and not use the fact that they lost a husband in war or 911 to help strengthen their arguing position.
She said that very thing on Tucker Carlson and Matt Lauer, as well as in her silly book.
And you’re in here because you just “wandered in here by accident” as you claimed, and are defending Coulters stance by repeatedly waving your supposed dead husband who supposedly is one of the 147 US troops killed in combat during Desert Storm.
Outstanding.
June 9th, 2006 at 7:17 pmto comment 804 by Clif.
I understand everything you are saying Clif, and I even agree with most of it. I said yesterday that I’m not sure I agree with this war in Iraq, but we’re here now so let’s support our troops. I am an intelligent woman who understands the complexities of war and politics to a great degree.
I know our soldiers are carrying the brunt of this heavy load, and I also know that Pres. Bush does not seem to understand that or feel the pain of those left behind. But I simply will not degrade what these valiant men are going through while they are “over there” it is an injustice to them. And that is how I really feel.
Bad war? Maybe. Probably. Good soldiers? Absolutely. But don’t most of us realize that the “higher ups” do all the talking and planning while the “grunts” have to be the ones to actually fight these wars? I do. My husband did. But still he went wherever he was called to go.
Enough of my preaching. I don’t think you are a bad person Clif. I don’t. I understand what you are saying even if I don’t agree with all of it.
Smile!
June 9th, 2006 at 7:31 pmGiven the idiots in power and their criminal behavior…the only possible way to actually support the troops is to demand a Claer plan or complete withdrawl…otherwise we become enablers of their deaths…and sending troops into battle with no plan for victory and a plan to follow the combat victory with a post combat victory is criminal. It is tantamount to agreeing to their wholesale slaughter..or maiming ..and saying this years deaths and wounded are justified by the deaths and wounded of past years is illogocal
June 9th, 2006 at 7:48 pmThere is nothing worse than a wolf in sheeps clothing.
June 9th, 2006 at 7:50 pmWith all the talk about the liberals pushing these women front and center to make political points, has everyone forgotten Deena Burnett speaking at the Republican National Convention in 2004? Her husband, Tom, died on the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania. Alright, she’s one person, but perhaps the only Republican among the survivors.
How ’bout the photo op on board the aircraft carrier with a large “Mission Accomplished” banner over Dubya’s head? Mission Accomplished??
Oh, can we ever forget Mr. Bush atop the fire truck at Ground Zero forcing that unfortunate fireman to stand next to him with the prez’s arm around his shoulder.
When it comes to politics, politicians use just about any means to get those photo ops. If Anne Coulter was trying to make that point, she went about it as a child would. Instead of making her point, she attacked the very women whom she claims were being exploited by the Democrats.
June 9th, 2006 at 8:28 pmI don’t think America will ever be able to go to war again without having half of the population get mad about it. While the deaths from the War on Terror are horrible, they aren’t numerous, especially compared to the death tolls of the other wars we’ve been in. I know that all of us think we have everything figured out…but let’s face the facts…we don’t know the facts! We are just citizens who are speculating as to what is actually going on over there and it isn’t getting us anywhere. I’m pretty sure President Bush and his cabinet aren’t idiots…how else do you think they could have succeeded in getting the most powerful jobs in the world? They can’t tell us everything, and they never will. Hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of men died in WW2 but nobody complained because it was necessarry…well, so is this war. If we just drop everything and leave, it will be chaos over there which will eventually find its way over here. Do you want a terrorists like Usama getting his hands on a nuclear bomb? Sure it might not be a realistic possibilty, but who wants to risk it. This war is a difficult one, but it has to be done.
June 9th, 2006 at 8:31 pmI don’t think we’re looking for Osama Bin Laden in Iraq. If he gets his hands on a nuclear weapon, it won’t be in Iraq or Afghanistan, it will be from some former Soviet discontent who needs the money.
Cole is right in that we can’t turn and run now from Iraq. However unfortunate our presence there is and however deceitful our leadership was to get us there, we have to stick it out…but for how long. I hate to see another Viet Nam occurring.
June 9th, 2006 at 8:37 pmWe are just citizens who are speculating as to what is actually going on over there and it isn’t getting us anywhere.
Comment by Cole — June 9, 2006 @ 8:31 pm
No you are a citizen who is speculating, because you’re a stupid sheep to lame to think for yourself.
Baaaaa
June 9th, 2006 at 8:40 pmI’m pretty sure President Bush and his cabinet aren’t idiots…
Comment by Mole — June 9, 2006 @ 8:31 pm
LOL, well I’m pretty sure you are.
June 9th, 2006 at 8:42 pmhow else do you think they could have succeeded in getting the most powerful jobs in the world?
Comment by Mole — June 9, 2006 @ 8:31 pm
Holy crap….stop dude, you’re killin me.
June 9th, 2006 at 8:43 pmAnd BTW, if this “isn’t getting us anywhere” then why are you in here runnin your mouth?
June 9th, 2006 at 8:46 pmIf we just drop everything and leave, it will be chaos over there
Comment by Mole — June 9, 2006 @ 8:31 pm
You mean the chaos we created by going in there.
Yea, maybe you’re right. Guess we shouldn’t have done it then, huh dumb ass?
June 9th, 2006 at 8:48 pmI don’t think George Bush was re-elected due to his stellar performance during his first term. You know what got him re-elected? FEAR. He instilled such fear into the American people, they felt they had to keep the same Commander-in-Chief. Just because the man got the job, doesn’t mean he is qualified to hold it. I wonder if Dick Cheney actually has his hand up Dubya’s back.
June 9th, 2006 at 8:52 pmwhich will eventually find its way over here
Comment by Mole — June 9, 2006 @ 8:31 pm
I see. You mean like in 100 years or so when the might actually HAVE a Navy or a long range Air Force???
Yea, theres a clear and present danger to America Charlemene. You get dropped on your head a lot as a kid?
June 9th, 2006 at 8:52 pmDo you want a terrorists like Usama getting his hands on a nuclear bomb? Sure it might not be a realistic possibilty
Comment by Mole — June 9, 2006 @ 8:31 pm
No, I don’t. Unfortunately there is one little, teensy weensy detail you left in your reichstag flyer Herr Goebbels, and that tiny detial is that Osama Bin Laden IS NOT IN IRAQ.
Dumbass.
June 9th, 2006 at 8:56 pmBut since the bozos you worship ignored Bin Laden, and focused on a country that didn’t pose any real threat to us, that possiblity is more and more likely.
See Bin Laden is in Kashmir, which is the disputed region in between India and Pakistan.
If Bin Laden can rally his vast support base in Pakistan and overthrow Musharraf, then the threat you guys always like to use to leverage your pissing on our Constitution may become an overnight reality.
Imagine the massive nuclear Arsenal of Pakistan in the hands of Bin Laden, just because you morons ignored him like the idiots you are, and went and picked on the smallest kid in the class you could fine.
Isn’t a brain between the lot of you.
June 9th, 2006 at 9:02 pm,
Yo Cole I didn’t say drop everything and leave…I sadi Get a clear plan…one that is not stay the course…or we’ll stand down when they decide to stand up…like they have control over us….
The report I cited titled
RECONSTRUCTING IRAQ: INSIGHTS, CHALLENGES, AND MISSIONS FOR MILITARY FORCES IN A POST-CONFLICT SCENARIO
by Conrad C. Crane and W. Andrew Terrill
February 2003
should be read and you will see why I call Bush Cheney and Rummy idiuots…all the probems we face today were laid out
June 9th, 2006 at 9:27 pmbefore the invasion even took place…but they ignored the possible problems and pretended that everything would go perfect…thus we have problems they kept denying for years until this spring when a slow boil civil war emerged…and then it is basically too late except to find an exit stragety…which will result in the country in the hands of the Shite majority who are allied with Iran..being fought by the Sunni minority…..and every time in the past the Sunni’s have emerged victorious…but that does not bode well for the US bases we are builkding there…or the oil which is not being produced even at PREWAR levels…let alone the thousands of Iraqi’s who are going to become victums or the hundreds of US military soldiers who will be sacrificed by the idiots at the top…
Worfeus I knew a few people who were killed…and will grant a modicam of truth to Linda
Comment by Clif
Clif
Sorry, I can’t make the same concension. While I have the utmost respect for those who truly lost someone in war, I have the utmost disdain for those who pretend to have done so when they really have not.
And remember, a few minutes ago you were telling me she might be MA. If she’s MA how could she also be some author who lost her husband in the first Gulf War?
She’s a liar. Nothing more.
And think about this.
Even is she had lost someone in a war, which she didn’t, but even if she had, shes using that in the EXACT SAME WAS as the 911 widows that she is criticizing for doing that.
Either way you slice it she’s a mess, but I am confident she is lying about her husband, the same way she lied about leaving, and not being a “professional blogger”.
June 9th, 2006 at 9:57 pmWorfeus i give a little credence when somebody posts..and she had to agree that the idiots are just that…no plan …no honor…no morality
June 9th, 2006 at 10:02 pmAnd Andrew Sullivan has a good quote about mAnn by an intern who met her in person, it explains mAnn off stage and onstage personality;
On the lecture circuit, I have heard many stories in Coulter’s wake of her actual charm, nervousness, politeness, civility, reasonableness in person. Now we’re all a little different in print than in person. People who meet me often say I’m much mellower and, er, nicer in person than I sometimes come off in pixels or print. That’s defensible, I think. Writing is sometimes about provoking, and it’s fine for a man or woman to have slightly different persona in reality than in print or even TV. But Coulter seems to have taken this to a bizarre extreme. Another reader comments:
Just wanted to add my little bit of insight to the Ann Coulter discussion. While interning at a cable news show a year ago, I was responsible for guest relations on a day when Ann Coulter was being interviewed in the studio. I had to meet Ann Coulter in the lobby, take her to the green room, prep her and bring her to the set. We chatted for a bit during that time, despite my intense dislike of her crude politics and television personality. I was shocked by how pleasant she was, even when I told her where I go to school (a favorite target of Fox News, one of the maligned Northeastern “bastions of the liberal elite”). She had spoken there recently and received the typical poor reception that she thrives on, but despite that she had nothing but great things to say about my college and all the “bright students” and their “brilliant questions.” If she had been talking about my school in the media, however, there is no question that the only words out of Ann Coulter’s mouth would have been “liberal elite”, “New England”, “brainwashing professors”, “traitors”, etc.
I came away from our conversation with the distinct impression that her television personality is exaggerated and largely manufactured, and that she doesn’t believe many of the ludicrous things she says. She’s not a radical of any sort, she’s just a coniving businesswoman. The woman has simply figured out how to market herself and make cold, hard cash, and will say any controversial thing she deems necessary to do so. That has become obvious after her outrageous attacks on the 9/11 widows, which have caused her book to shoot to the top of the Amazon charts.
What Ann Coulter does is worse than other media personalities who actually believe the vileness that they spew, because she does it solely for the money and notoriety, despite her hypocritical claims to the mantles of Christianity and patriotism. Her actions show that she is devoted to just one thing: the church of the American dollar. To borrow a line from Jon Stewart, cheap hacks like her are hurting America.
And hurting some people who lost their own families in a terrorist atrocity. I take Coulter as seriously as I take a fictional character. Except most fictional characters do not make millions by assassinating the characters and wounding the souls of other real human beings.
http://time.blogs.com/daily_dish/2006/06/cracking_the_da.html
June 9th, 2006 at 10:05 pmIn case anyone is wondering, the reason why victims’ families in the towers got compensated was to prevent massive lawsuits against American and United Airlines, forcing them (further) into bankruptcy and out of business, and leaving only a couple of other national air carriers. I guess whoever supervised the “Special Master” system figured that families of those killed in the Pentagon would get taken care of through DOD. That surprised me, as I thought that victims’ families in both places PLUS Shanksville were offered compensation.
It is only a dim memory now, but I recall the day that the 4ID was turned around from docking in Turkey and routed to Kuwait, having been denied access to northern Iraq by Turkey’s parliment. There was a news item that day following the announcement of the rerouting of 4ID that said that Secretary Rumsfeld and General Myers had announced cuts in future Veterans’ benefits. This is how well the ruling elite, aka the “Chicken Hawks,” none of whom (except Myers; I’m sure he was following orders) EVER faced combat, reward those who serve and sacrifice to keep them in their temples of leadership.
Linda, thank you for your husband’s service and sacrifice. No one should give you grief about his sacrifice. Too bad Bush, Cheney, Rummi, and Wolfowitz never had to feel the pain of losing someone in combat so as to make them realize that war is more than an intellectual (for everyone but Bush) excercise. It is “leaders” like the NeoCon cabal that devalue our service people and who do a disservice to those left to grieve. You cannot hold the 9/11 victims’ families responsible for the fact that our leadership decided it was more important to prevent the collapse of our airline industry than to better compensate the families of servicepersons who have made the ultimate sacrifice.
As to Ann Coulter, today at lunch my immediate family discussed the Coulter-Lauer exchange. I am the only “lefty” in that group, but I was not surprised that all the others were as disgusted by Coulter’s comments as I was. Good people can see right through hate-speak. I agree with those who say that Coulter has no real message, just as the Nazi party has no real message other than a desire to destroy others who do not look/think the same as they do. Ann Coulter has LOTS of use for victims’ familes who agree with her point. But the way she makes her money is selling books, and the way she sells books is to be outrageous, flashy (hence the cocktail dress at 7am), disagreeable, and unapologetic. Her criticism of the Widows’ compensation is the most hypocritical thing I have ever heard from the Right, given how she makes her living.
As to supporting our President, I was behind him through Afghanistan, until he made the “Right”-turn into Iraq. It has been made clear through revelations of former Administration officials (Clarke and O’Neill) that Iraq was the real target on 9/12, and that Afghanistan simply had to be conquered first because that’s where al qaida was (this after they tried mightily to link Saddam to Osama). It was a stroke of genius to employ the Afghan warlords and high-altitude air power to do that job, thus preventing the US Army from becoming bogged down there like the Sovs before them and keeping them fresh for the attack on Iraq. I also remember that the week before Georgie-Boy began banging the Iraq drum so loud, he was being accused of insider trading in the White House press room. Convinent that Iraq came along and diverted the attention of everyone away from that little story. Martha went to jail for lying to the SEC, why not Georgie?
The resons for going to war in Iraq have morphed more often than Winston Smith’s newspaper stories in “1984.” First it’s imminent threat…OOPS! It was really because of WMD and nukes…OOPS!! That Saddam sure is a bad guy…OOPS!! It’s our God-given duty to overthrow tyranical regimes and instill freedom and democracy everywhere that there is oil…except in Saudi and Kuwait, since they are our friends…OOPS!! Mission Accomplished…OOPS!! The insurgency is in its death throes…OOPS!!! Our troops may have tortured, abused, or even killed people who had nothing to do with the insurgency… Today it seems that the death of Al Zarqawi has re-energized those who think that the war in Iraq has been worthwhile. It would seem to me that all Georgie and company have succeeded in doing is (a) create instability in the world oil market, thus helping drive up gas prices and Big Oil record profits, (b) killing and maiming more people than were killed or maimed on 9/11 (American and Iraqis, whose dead and wounded the Administration steadfastly refuses to count), and (c) letting the “Real Killer”, Osama, continue to issue new tapes from time to time to continue in his role as “the enemy”, laughing at us the whole time. Maybe Georgie when he retires should go golfing with OJ Simpson; maybe he’ll find Osama out on the links with the “real killer” of Nicole.
And by the way, every day 3000 undocumented persons cross the Mexican border; this total could include al qaida members or others who wish our nation and its citizens harm. But what does George see as our biggest threat? GAY MARRIAGE! When 45 states already have legislation banning the practice!! And NO challenges to DOMA have ever made it to the appeals court, let alone to the Supreme. Then flag burning right after that! Look at what a good job he is doing of making us safer!
The fact that Ann Coulter supports this moron proves her stupidity. Nuff Said.
June 9th, 2006 at 11:31 pmAnd this my friends is why the left loses so often.
Because they fall for the rights bs everytime.
Hey leftleaningmoderate.
Don’t you think its just a wee bit odd that a woman who supposedly lost her husband in a war, is in here trying to support Ann Coulters argument that women who lost husbands in war and on 911 should not use that for leverage in making a political argument, is in here using her supposed husbands death as leverage?
Sorry, but she’s playing you guys like a cheap banjo, and thats what they do everytime they beat us.
Don’t buy it. No woman who really lost her husband that way is going to be in here cussing and swearing and trying to get the last word in edgewise to support Coulters rants.
She is a troll, most likely a regular.
She did not loose her husband in the war. Or do you honestly believe she is one of 147 women who lost a husband to combat in Desert Storm, wrote 3 books and yet does not want to mention what books, or talk about her husbands military service “too much”, other than to threaten us with her husbands ghost?
Don’t let her play you guys like this.
June 9th, 2006 at 11:48 pmFlavius..please keep an open mind to all things and remember to be kind.
Comment by Linda — June 9, 2006 @ 1:16 am
I wish my husband was alive now, he would rip your head off and shit down your neck.
Comment by Linda — June 9, 2006 @ 6:20 pm
June 9th, 2006 at 11:54 pmJune 10th, 2006 at 12:30 am
I have never seen such a hysterical group of rants without any substance at all as that in the comments here. If anything, it proves Coulter’s arguments. She is making a valid, or at least arguable point: that by using their widow status to front for partisan political arguments, one cannot respond by attacking points of disagreement without seeming callous toward “grief-stricken widows who have lost their husbands in a national tragedy”.That is a point worth discussing, pro or con, and not one which justifies demonizing Coulter.
Let’s recall that the widows suffered a loss more or less at random; that is, they had nothing to do with it except the happenstance of where their husbands were at the time, and their husbands were killed without regard to what each of them might have believed, done, lived, etc. Thus they have no more right to have their political opinions reified than any other American, and many Americans disagree strongly with their positions.
They have every right to their opinions, but not to the implied ‘you can’t answer me back because I’m a grieving widow’ without seeming callous and heartless. That is Coulter’s point, nothing more.
June 10th, 2006 at 4:33 amHere is a reasonable means of arguing:
Show how the Widows are wrong. Don’t attack the widows attack their opinions, and use logic and factual evidence to back your arguments. There is nothing wrong with that, you don’t get called callous for doing that. This is actually not special treatment we want just for the Widows, it is how we should be treating each other anyway. Of course, what is the right without martyrdom and Ad Hominem? When last did you hear the rightwing argue something on its merits, rather then just slime the opposition?
Calling them “The Witches of East Brunswick” is not a reasonable argument. It is not even an argument, it is just a schoolyard taunt.
Your point is bullshit, if I called you a 3 cent whore whose only major benefit to humanity will be your death, you would be pissed off, its the same basic thing.
June 10th, 2006 at 7:26 amIf I claimed that you were happy about the death of a loved one, and really cashing in on it, you would be pissed off, and that is exactly what Ann is accusing these widows of.
If I then went on to use the death of your loved one in order to make a quick buck while celebrating the death of your loved one, you would really get pissed off. That is exactly what Ann Coulter is doing.
It isn’t a case of making a point, it is a case of there being limits to what can be taken in common decency, unless you are Ann Coulter of course.
I say, let Coulter talk. She is only showing what she is about, and this can only hurt the right wing. Keep talking Ann, we need a Democrat in the White House badly.
June 10th, 2006 at 8:05 amLinda- I would pay money to see that!! Funny leftards have no problem doing the same thing that they say they abhor. You have to remember above all else the very foundation of liberalism is hypocrisy.
June 10th, 2006 at 9:35 amAnn- there will never be a democrat in the white house until the democratic party shuns the left wingnut kook fringe ( like most of the posters here for example). America does not want a socialist in the White House.
flava- flav – Linda does want to see you have an open mind- she just wants to see yours opened from the other end .
[...] Yesterday on Imus, Mary Matlin — a former counselor to Vice President Cheney and an influential strategist for the White House — defended Ann Coulter’s vicious attack on the 9/11 widows. (In a new book, Coulter says the widows are “enjoying their husband’s deaths.”) [...]
June 10th, 2006 at 11:16 amLinda does want to see you have an open mind- she just wants to see yours opened from the other end .
Comment by Miss Chris — June 10, 2006 @ 9:35 am
Awww look. The little pissant is so mad at having his clock repeatedly cleaned that he has reverted to what mental midgets like hm always revert to.
Empty threats of violence.
Sorry you didn’t pay better attention in school Mary. Maybe next time momma oughta consider letting you out of the double-wide once in a while, so you can go to a real school where they use books and stuff.
Then maybe your dumbass will think of something smart to say.
June 10th, 2006 at 12:53 pmI have never seen such a hysterical group of rants without any substance at all as that in the comments here. If anything, it proves Coulter’s arguments. She is making a valid, or at least arguable point: that by using their widow status to front for partisan political arguments, one cannot respond by attacking points of disagreement without seeming callous toward “grief-stricken widows who have lost their husbands in a national tragedyâ€.
Comment by David Dork — June 10, 2006 @ 4:33 am
You mean like your friend (and alter ego) Linda has been doing for the last 2 days?
Waving her so called husbands death around to strengthen her point that you can’t wave the death of a loved one in someones face?
June 10th, 2006 at 12:58 pmflava – flav you are proving your idiocy again- something you do everytime you post. You cleaned my clock?? now THAT’s funny. you couln’t clean a mickey mouse watch if you were inside of it. You fight like a little girl. Having a battle of wits with someone who is so defensless like you is no contest little boy. You think all conservatives who are patriotic live in trailers eh?little boy you would be suprised beyond belief. Your racist little tirades prove once again just how very ignorant you are.
June 10th, 2006 at 1:08 pmonce again I wonder if your mammy knows you are playing with here computer. I wonder if she thinks it’s funny that her little flav is taking time out from going to a gay pride parade or anti war march to type onher grownup somputer.
Flav maybe someday you’ll grow up but I doubt it. You’ll probably grow up to be a good commie like all the rest of the leftards and get to blow ted kennedy or something. No wonder democrats keep losing elections. quit while you still can ya little twit.
They have every right to their opinions, but not to the implied ‘you can’t answer me back because I’m a grieving widow’ without seeming callous and heartless. That is Coulter’s point, nothing more.
Comment by David — June 10, 2006 @ 4:33 am
No that is NOT her point. Coulter said they should NOT talk at all. She said they should SHUT UP. She said it on the number one morning show in America, and I watched her say it dumb ass.
And by the way. You morons are the ONLY ONES implying that you can’t answer back to them because they are grieving widows.
They welcome, hell the INVITE your rebuttals.
But all you DIMWITS could come up with is a foul 7th grade reader that makes juvinile personal attacks on their characters and vile insults.
Then the really funny part, is that your pathetic worthless inbred self has the nerve to bellycrawl in here and cry about me insulting you.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. You wimps sure like to dish it out, but smack you once on the nose and ow, stop it hurts, waaaa.
Bunch of wimps.
June 10th, 2006 at 1:09 pmI’m sorry Miss Chris but your last post was barely literate.
Like I told you before, invest in a speak-n-spell.
I hear they do wonders.
June 10th, 2006 at 1:13 pmAnd try to calm down silly.
So many one liner attacks clumped into a paragraph like that are a dead giveaway as to your rage, along of course with your silly wittle empty threats, LMFAO.
June 10th, 2006 at 1:21 pmAlso remember capitalization is not a random option. You’re gonna want to capitalize every word starting a sentence, not every other one. You also might want to use capitals for proper nouns.
Don’t worry my angry little Coultergnome. Once you’ve spent some time on the Speak-N-Spell you’ll start to get the hang of it.
June 10th, 2006 at 1:24 pmChris you are yet to disprove the basic substance of the acusation that the idiot in chief and dead eye rushed the country to a war that was ill concieved..NO WMD’s…NO threat from Iraq…thus NO legitimate reason to invade by the UN sanctions, …Thus the WAR is illegal
Now about the actual invasion….A plan that any 2nd Lt, would get sent back to FINISH…where was the follow on to combat operations…where is the consolodation of the objective…where was the rounding up of the enemy both regular military and irregulars…where was the securing of the weapons and ammo of the enemy to secure it and keep it out of the habds of future enemies that very reasonably be expected given thwe fact the Iraqi’s have never accepted a western christian nations military on their country….go ask Churchill about his expierence after WW1
And as for follow on to combat…it is usually the state dept’s job to be dirtectally involved in the creation of a democratic government…then why did the DOD cut out DOS from any after action planning until they brought Bremer in …WAY TOO LATE….the looting had been begun…the insurgents had been bypassed….the weapons and ammo were being hidden to be used in the insurection.
Also can you explain why Rumsfeld acted like he didn’t think a major city ..the caspital of a copuntry being looted is NOT a problem…and that it is MORE important to defend the Ministry of OIL instead of weapons and ammo that are now being used against US troops…how is that supporting the troops?
The incompetence of the idiots who planned and executed this operatrion would have gotten anybody except these clowns RELIEVED of duty…but Bush cried stay ythe course…of ignoring a rising insurgency and pretending everythinfg is going well…until it erupts in a slow boil civil war…THREE years later…and HE decided Rummy et al should stay? WTF is the idiot in cjief using for his thought processes…the same ones he used to decide that using cocaine was more important than furfilling his duty he agreed to furfil…like honoring the contract he signed?
See this is how you ask questions …not calling people who losty loved ones vile names and slandering both them and those they lost…and calling people here juvinile names because the real situation on the ground shows the complete lack of competence on the part of the chimp in chief…dead eye dick rummy..and the psychopants that follow them with NO real concern for the troops their dependants or the Americans people otherwise they wouldn’t have been derilict in their duties to actually defend the US Constitution..and properly execute the offices they agreed to…looks like a pattern on Bush’s part.
June 10th, 2006 at 1:40 pmWell, as a woman, I have the right to change my mind. And I have. I’m back!
June 10th, 2006 at 1:49 pmI just can’t help but comment on all the ridiculous posts I just read. Mostly from our little friend Flavie of course. Does anyone else out there see how pathetic this person is and do you wonder why he NEVER answers any of my questions? He just prattles on like an old hen and spews his venom.
No, he isn’t worth the time it takes to fart. Let alone debate the ASS.
So let us all see what the guy who sits at his computer all day and spews idiotic crap out of his left of center pie hole has to say now. I wonder if Flavie is too old to get a job, to dimwitted to get a job, or too lazy to get a job? I guess he thinks BLOGGING all day and night IS A JOB!!! HA!
I wish I could tell you that you make me angry Flava, but you make me laugh. You are so funny! Great entertainment. I love some of your assumptions. Too funny!
Well, as a woman, I have the right to change my mind. And I have. I’m back
Comment by Linda — June 10, 2006 @ 1:49 pm
LOL. You mean like everytime you say, THIS IS MY VERY LAST POST?
LOL. Oh but you’re not a troll. Just a grieving widow, lol.
June 10th, 2006 at 1:53 pmI just can’t help but comment
Comment by I’m not a Troll Linda — June 10, 2006 @ 1:49 pm
Don’t worry. Most trolls can’t.
I seem to have that effect on them for some reason.
Wonder why?
June 10th, 2006 at 1:56 pmNo, he isn’t worth the time it takes to fart. Let alone debate the ASS
Comment by I just might be a troll Linda — June 10, 2006 @ 1:49 pm
Yea? That’s nice.
Course I couldn’t help but notice that I have been worth the time to YOU, for the last 3 days now.
Guess thats one long fart, huh?
June 10th, 2006 at 1:59 pmI wish I could tell you that you make me angry Flava
Comment by I wish I weren’t a Troll Linda — June 10, 2006 @ 1:49 pm
I know, I know. It’s hard, but don’t worry, you’ll find the words.
June 10th, 2006 at 2:01 pmIn fact, why not use these words?
They worked for you last night.
I wish my husband was alive now, he would rip your head off and shit down your neck.
Comment by I am so busted as a Troll Linda — June 9, 2006 @ 6:20 pm
LOL, naahhh, you’re not angry, LOL.
June 10th, 2006 at 2:17 pmclif this forum is about An Coulter and her rightfully commenting on the fact that the jersey girls have been absconded with by the hard left anti American wingnuts NOT about the president . I can tell when you refer to the President of the US as “idiot and chief” you must have gone to the michael moore cahrm school of traitors and lowlifes. yeah ho mum Bush is hitler and Bush lied and Bush doesn’t care about black people- yawn, same ol same ol from the tratorous far frige kook left. go tell someone who cares.
June 10th, 2006 at 2:26 pmFlava – flav you sure as one to comment on my English grammar. Hypocrisy as usual is a cornerstone of liberalism. but it is funny that you post 3 posts in a row- got your goat didn’t it? makes you crazy that normal , patriotic Americans not only disagree with your twisted logic but will call you out on your ignorance.
I don’t mind the comical attacks on me any problem but to attack a woman whose husband gave his life in the service of his country so left wingnut leftard anti- American can come to socialist websites like this and spew their unintelligible, vile ,juvenile little hate mail is to me disgusting.
The far left once agin proves how much they hate this country and all that makes it great and what absolute traitors and slime they are.
oh yeah and getting to the original issue, nobody here has proven AnnCoulter wrong yet- not one.
too bad America does not shoot traitors and seditionists any more- they would have plenty of fodder here .
I can tell when you refer to the President of the US as “idiot and chief†you must have gone to the michael moore cahrm school of traitors and lowlifes. yeah ho mum Bush is hitler and Bush lied and Bush doesn’t care about black people- yawn, same ol same ol from the tratorous far frige kook left. go tell someone who cares
Comment by Miss Pissed Chris — June 10, 2006 @ 2:26 pm
I’m sorry, was there a coherent sentence in there?
If so, what is its meaning?
June 10th, 2006 at 2:41 pmtoo bad America does not shoot traitors and seditionists any more- they would have plenty of fodder here .
Comment by Miss Pissed Chris — June 10, 2006 @ 2:26 pm
Aww, lookie. The little baby is so mad he’s making more empty threats.
Wow, this time they’re death threats.
Your panties must really be a knot ay Mary?
June 10th, 2006 at 2:58 pmno threats flav – just dreams of a better time when scumbags could be shot for their crimes against their country. musta gotcha agian flav two consecutive posts- hittin a nerve am I ? you do talk like you are about 8 or 9 years old.
June 10th, 2006 at 3:33 pmdear mr grammar nazi I’ll translate my sentence for you – YOU ARE AN ASSHOLE.
relax man you are really PMSing dude.
relax man
Comment by Christine — June 10, 2006 @ 3:33 pm
YOU ARE AN ASSHOLE.
Comment by Christine — June 10, 2006 @ 3:33 pm
LMFAO
June 10th, 2006 at 4:01 pmYes, yes. I have to say something AGAIN! HA!
June 10th, 2006 at 4:07 pmThis blog is not about a mature debate over Ann Coulter’s comments or anything of any relevence, AS FAR AS FLAVIE goes. No, this blog is the only outlet Flavie has for venting his rage. AND, we should all understand by now, that Flavie is an attention seeker. That is all Flavie cares about. He wants ATTENTION!! And when we comment to this frustrated, chronic masturbator, who obviously cannot even come to his own party, we are only egging him on………so I say, either disregard the mental midget altogether, or rile him up until he can’t see straight. Personally? I’m enjoying the hell out of his rants. His self serving bullshit means nothing.
But damn, it sure makes me proud of who I am, and it makes me proud as hell of the real man I loved and lost.
Now rant and rave some more, little person. Your punishment in this life is having to be who you are.
And Clif? If you are still there, I wouldn’t hitch my horse to his wagon. It only makes you look ridiculous, and I tend to think you are not a ridiculous person at all.
I cannot believe that we are nearing 1,000 comments on Ann Coulter but we’ve left the Arlen Specter caves (again) story with, what, 256 comments as of this writing?? Or the lack of net neutrality that may forever end free speech on the Internet? You are playing right into the hands of the Talking Points/Karl Rove crowd…distract, dispute, deny…from the real issues. The real issues of the day are still NSA spying, still 756 instances of the president breaking the law (with his so-called “signing statements” and Unitary Executive Doctrine that puts the Legislative and Judicial branches in the back seat to the Executive), still Jack Abramoff’s ties to George W. Bush, still the willful & treasonous outing of a CIA covert operative by the Executive branch, still thrown elections in 2000 and again in 2004 creating an illegitimate cabal milking taxpayers and making their corporate friends rich, still phony WMD excuses to invade an oil-rich Middle-Eastern country in Iraq, still record oil profits as a result of the ‘troubles’, still 40 million uninsured U.S. citizens, still New Orleans without power & water or 70% of its black residents (my family lives there), still 2600 dead countrymen killed in a privatized war (profits for Halliburton and all of the defense contractors), still all three branches of the government in GOP hands, still marching blindly toward absolute fascism…
June 10th, 2006 at 4:09 pmYes, yes. I have to say something AGAIN! HA!
Comment by I am such a freakin troll Linda — June 10, 2006 @ 4:07 pm
Really?
We never would’ve guessed.
June 10th, 2006 at 4:21 pmBut damn, it sure makes me proud of who I am, and it makes me proud as hell of the real man I loved and lost.
Comment by I am such a freakin troll Linda — June 10, 2006 @ 4:07 pm
Once more “I am not a troll just a grieving widow” waves her supposed dead husbands corpse in our face, to demonstrate how correct Ann Coulter is that dead widows shouldn’t wave their husbands corposes in our face.
Like I said yesterday.
She’s not even a smart troll.
June 10th, 2006 at 4:25 pmCorrection.
“I am not a troll just a grieving widow†Linda waves her supposed dead husbands corpse in our face, to demonstrate how correct Ann Coulter is that widows shouldn’t wave their dead husbands corposes in our face.
Of course, its ok when THEY do it, right?
June 10th, 2006 at 4:27 pmSo tell us Troll Linda.
Why don’t you get your husbands corpse out, and put some dark glasses on it.
You can parade him around with you to help sell Ann Coulters garbage, and take pictures with it and stuff.
It would be like “Weekend at Bernies”.
June 10th, 2006 at 4:33 pmNo, this blog is the only outlet Flavie has for venting his rage.
Comment by Droll Troll Linda — June 10, 2006 @ 4:07 pm
Yea, I’m the one with the rage in here. LOL, too funny Linda.
You’re just too damned funny.
June 10th, 2006 at 4:35 pmI wish my husband was alive now, he would rip your head off and shit down your neck.
Comment by I’m not angry at all Linda — June 9, 2006 @ 6:20 pm
LMFAO
June 10th, 2006 at 4:36 pmThis is just so ridiculous. I am new to blogging, as I have already stated, and I looked up this Flavie guy, and I find out that he blogs anywhere and everywhere he can. Which proves my point that he is nothing more than an attention seeker who prattles on and must continue to use the same old boring phrases and terminology to be hurtful and hateful.
I will not dignify anything he said to me personally with a direct answer. But I have to tell you people out there, this Flavie Freak makes me feel dirty and ugly just by the statements he makes about my husband. Because no mater what, he will always be my husband, and I his wife. Even in his death. But I will speak no more of this now, as I know I will be dragged through the muck again for saying this….I feel as if I have dishonored him, and for that I am so very sorry. And I was so stupid to believe, when I first started making comments a couple of days ago, that this was going to be a mature and legitimate debate over Ann Coulter and the widows of 9/11.
So there you have it. I admit my mistake. I guess I just figure most people are honest and kind until proven otherwise. It’s in my nature. And Flavie is right, I should have stayed out of this altogether as I once wrote. This is just too degrading and beneath me.
I hate when crap like this happens. When you set out as a decent individual and get sucked into the vomit and bile of someone else’s nature.
Sorry Everyone.
Once again. God Bless Our Troops. And hey! We got Zarqawi didn’t we??????? OOH-RAH!!!!!
June 10th, 2006 at 4:53 pmThis is just so ridiculous. I am new to blogging, as I have already stated,
Comment by I’m new to Trolling Linda — June 10, 2006 @ 4:53 pm
And stated.
And stated.
And stated.
June 10th, 2006 at 5:27 pmand I looked up this Flavie guy, and I find out that he blogs anywhere and everywhere he can.
Comment by I’m new to lying Linda — June 10, 2006 @ 4:53 pm
Another kinard my dead husband waving wench.
I blog in here and ONE other blog on a regular basis.
So lets see how you guys do math there in DEADHUSBANDVILLE
Anywhere and Everywhere = 2 places
Brilliant.
June 10th, 2006 at 5:30 pmI will not dignify anything he said to me personally with a direct answer.
Comment by I can’t tell the truth to save my Dead Husbands life Linda — June 10, 2006 @ 4:53 pm
If only it were so.
June 10th, 2006 at 5:31 pmso now you are clubber worfeus eh? trying to improve your image? make yourself look a little more macho so you can attack the wife of a dead hero.
June 10th, 2006 at 6:02 pmit’s too bad that good men have to go and fight evil in some third world shithole when they could do service here in America cleaning up the vomitous pukebags here.
Comment to Chris:
June 10th, 2006 at 6:24 pmType in Flavius Worfeus in your search engine and see what this guy is up to, amazing it took me so long to do this myself.
And thanks Sweetie for sticking up for me. You, Sir, are a gentleman.
God Bless, Linda- keep up the fight and if you take away nothing else from this band of wack jobs here remember that there are still some American Patriots out here who do appreciate your sacrifice. keep doing whatever to can to piss off and fight the lunatic liberal leftard traitors .
June 10th, 2006 at 6:32 pm[...] Yesterday on Imus, Mary Matlin — a former counselor to Vice President Cheney and an influential strategist for the White House — defended Ann Coulter’s vicious attack on the 9/11 widows. (In a new book, Coulter says the widows are “enjoying their husband’s deaths.”) [...]
June 10th, 2006 at 6:41 pmFor Chris:
I will always fight for what I beleive is right. And I will always honor our war heroes as well as men and women such as yourself.
Your reply was exactly what I needed to hear right now. Thank you, dear man. And God Bless.
You are a true American Patriot. I salute you!
June 10th, 2006 at 6:49 pmI’m wondering if our little Flava-Boy is even an American Citizen…….anyone out there with some thoughts on this?
June 10th, 2006 at 6:57 pmMexico maybe????? Just a thought.