ThinkFast AM: June 13, 2006
ThinkFast AM: June 13, 2006
Republican House leaders unveiled a draft resolution that will be the subject of this week’s floor debate on Iraq. But the resolution cloaked the Iraq conflict under the broader war against terrorism. In a letter to House Majority Leader John Boehner, Rep. Ike Skelton, ranking member of the Armed Services Committee, said, “I think you well understand that the war in Iraq is a separate conflict, an insurgency with terrorist elements and sectarian violence.”
An EPA rule designed to keep “groundwater clean near oil drilling sites and other construction zones was loosened after White House officials rejected it amid complaints by energy companies that it was too restrictive and after a well-connected Texas oil executive appealed to White House senior advisor Karl Rove.”
The Washington Post reviews the writings of new White House domestic policy adviser Karl Zinsmeister, who started his job yesterday. “With a sharp pen,†Zinsmeister personally attacked his opponents, for instance, calling Al Gore a “mad dog” known to “foam at the mouth.” Jacques Chirac, Nelson Mandela, Gerhard Schroeder and Kofi Annan were labeled “feckless fools.”
A new study shows the “bloody fingerprints” of global warming: Polar bears “may be turning to cannibalism because longer seasons without ice keep them from getting to their natural food.”
“Faced with a widening federal investigation into his ties to a high-powered lobbying firm, House Appropriations Chairman Jerry Lewis (R-CA) has retained a criminal defense attorney. … Lewis is facing federal scrutiny over his dealings with the lobbying firm Copeland, Lowery, Jacquez, Denton & White. FBI officials recently pulled Lewis’ personal financial records, and several current and former Lewis aides also are being investigated.â€
Iranian police beat women’s rights activists at a rally of about 200 people yesterday. The women “demanded equal rights for women and the nullification of a law allowing Iranian men to have four wives.” None of Iran’s state-run media outlets reported on the protest.
“Private military contractors are earning billions of dollars in Iraq — much of it from U.S. taxpayers. … Lucrative U.S. government contracts go to firms called on to provide security for projects and personnel — jobs that in previous conflicts have been done by the military.”
The National Religious Campaign Against Torture, a group of twenty-seven distinguished religious leaders, have signed a statement urging the United States to “abolish torture now — without exceptions.” The statement, being published in newspaper advertisements starting today, states that torture “violates the basic dignity of the human person” and “contradicts our nation’s most cherished values.”
Al Gore is looking to spread his global warming message beyond movie theaters. Gore said yesterday “that by the end of the summer he would start a bipartisan education campaign to train 1,000 people to give a version of his slide show on global warming featured in the film ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ and book of the same name.â€
And finally: locals and tourists in St. Andrews, Scotland, don’t seem to know much about Abramoff’s infamous golf junket. “For all the Beltway chatter…, locals in this windswept beach town are distinctly uninterested. […] As for Americans misbehaving in St. Andrews, locals would rather talk about recent allegations that actor Kevin Costner acted inappropriately during a massage at the spa in the Old Course Hotel.”
What did we miss? Let us know in the comments section.
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog Roll
First Rove, now all of this sh*t.
I’m going back to bed….
June 13th, 2006 at 9:10 amBring out the Republican spin line! Like a dervish on crack, the “insurgency with terrorist elements and sectarian violence” is part of the “broader war against terrorism” because if there was no attacking Iraq based upon (false) ties with terrorists, then there would be no “insurgency with terrorist elements and sectarian violence.”
See? Isn’t it simple? The war in Iraq, which was (falsly) attributed to weapons of mass destruction (that didn’t exist), and which (now) was solely for the purpose of removing a evil dictator from power (ignore N. Korea as no oil is in his country) has (now) always been a part of the “broader war against terrorism.” (Ignore the fact that Usama bin Laden HATES Saddam Hussein.)
There, got it? If you need any more spin on this subject, speak to any Republican or troll on this site. They’ll be more than happy to spin the subject some more.
June 13th, 2006 at 9:14 amAbout Iraq: There is a new deployment of 75000 troops in Baghdad, only. That’s half the USA military there! (I know, Iraqis will be deployed as well, but hey, it’s a great number of troops, anyways). What they plan? Level the city to rubble? Scary, no less.
June 13th, 2006 at 9:24 amPolar Bears eating each other does not sound good > next they will eat people I suppose?!
June 13th, 2006 at 9:40 amWASHINGTON, June 13 — The prosecutor in the C.I.A. leak case on Monday advised Karl Rove, the senior White House adviser, that he would not be charged with any wrongdoing, effectively ending the nearly three-year criminal investigation that had at times focused intensely on Mr. Rove.
The decision by the prosecutor, Patrick J. Fitzgerald, announced in a letter to Mr. Rove’s lawyer, Robert D. Luskin, lifted a pall that had hung over Mr. Rove who testified on five occasions to a federal grand jury about his involvement in the disclosure of an intelligence officer’s identity.
[…]
We believe that the Special Counsel’s decision should put an end to the baseless speculation about Mr. Rove’s conduct.”
http://www.nytimes.com/ 2006/ 06/ 13/ washington/ 13cnd-leak.html?ei=5094&en=e40da3e03155858f&hp=&ex=1150257600&partner=homepage&pagewanted=print
Are you kidding? The Filthy Left has only begun to publish baseless speculation. Congratulations to KKKarl for putting up with the slander and gross hypocrisy of Satan’s minions here in the USA. May his slander and libel lawsuits against the Left break their bank. Baseless accusations should be very costly.
June 13th, 2006 at 9:44 amJay
“Polar Bears eating each other does not sound good”
What do you mean? Thats great, after all bears are the #1 threat.
June 13th, 2006 at 9:45 am“Gore said yesterday “that by the end of the summer he would start a bipartisan education campaign to train 1,000 people to give a version of his slide show on global warming featured in the film ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ ”
What fun. 1000 Gorebots to laugh at and ridicule. Can’t wait to see one.
June 13th, 2006 at 9:47 am#5 - “Congratulations to KKKarl for putting up with the slander and gross hypocrisy of Satan’s minions here in the USA.”
Actually, KKKarl has been very proficient at helping the Republican party (or as you properly label them, “Satan’s minions here in the USA”). You know, the party that slandars at the drop of a hat and is the most hypocriticcal political party in the US.
“Baseless accusations should be very costly.”
You’d think they would. Unfortunately, the Republican party will not be held responsible for the baseless accusations they make on a regular basis. The Republican party is no longer the party of “personal responsibility”, but you are quite aware of that fact, “Right between the I’s”.
June 13th, 2006 at 9:55 amMore interesting news from the peaceful Pal’s in the disputed territory God gave to the Jews…..
Jerusalem—–June 11…….An Israel Defense Forces intelligence officer has confirmed that the explosion that killed eight Palestinians on Friday, was caused by a stockpile of Hamas explosives.
“Shortly after we stopped defensive firing at Hamas rocket launch pads which were deployed behind Palestinian human shields, members of Hamas scrambled to fire more rockets at our positions,” said Col. M. “We have eyes on every meter of Gaza, from the sky, from the ground and from the sea. One of their rocket tripods collapsed inadvertently setting off an explosion of a stockpile of Qassam rockets. The Palestinians killed their own children. And this was not the first time.”
http://www.israelnewsagency.com/ hamasterrorgazaisrael48770611.html
You don’t think we call them “Splodeydopes” for nothing do you?
June 13th, 2006 at 9:55 amThe Republican party is no longer the party of “personal responsibilityâ€, but you are quite aware of that fact, “Right between the I’sâ€.
Comment by Democrat Soldier
Don’t blame me if the Republicans have adopted the Donks habit pursuing the politics of personal destruction, they asked for it. In my opinion it was a little late in coming. In any case I’m not a Republican. I’m an independent conservative who hates the Filthy Left and doesn’t think much of W’s compassionate conservative bullsh*t. In other words, I’m so far to the right you have to look over your left shoulder to see me coming. If I was in charge the words “treason” and “sedition” would be used in federal courtrooms to describe many prominent liberals and conservatives.
June 13th, 2006 at 10:05 am#10 - Trust me when I say the majority of Americans thank God whole heartedly that you are not anywhere close to being “in charge”. It’s people like you who hate the American Constitution that are bringing us down. It’s sick-o-’Phants of your political persuasion that make average Americans sick of the spin, calumny, and mendacity that are the staples of the “neo-con†existence.
The Republicans in office have fallen into sin and vice due to their personal irresponsibility and hubris. They can only blame themselves and their continuing failed policies for their perusing the politics of personal destruction.
It’s going to be a wonderful day on the 8th of Nov. when we hear how they’ve lost seats in both the House and Senate. It’s going to be a day of rejoicing and national pride when Pres. Bush is shown the door on the 20th of January 2009.
June 13th, 2006 at 10:15 amIRI is back?
…quick get out the holy water…
June 13th, 2006 at 10:17 amBush is shown the door on the 20th of January 2009.
Comment by Democrat Soldier #12
…or sooner…
June 13th, 2006 at 10:19 amLooks like we’ve exchanged Santo for IRI. Both of them are more interesting than most of the newer trolls…
June 13th, 2006 at 10:20 am“It’s going to be a wonderful day on the 8th of Nov. when we hear how they’ve lost seats in both the House and Senate.”
And it’s gonna be even better when you realise you still don’t have control of either.
“Lucrative U.S. government contracts go to firms called on to provide security for projects and personnel — jobs that in previous conflicts have been done by the military.—
June 13th, 2006 at 10:21 amSo the left gets mad when we don’t pull the troops out, but then we start pulling the troops out and replacing them with mercs, and the left is still mad?
Iranian police beat women’s rights activists at a rally of about 200 people yesterday. The women “demanded equal rights for women and the nullification of a law allowing Iranian men to have four wives.†None of Iran’s state-run media outlets reported on the protest.
“Iran’s Islamic law imposes tight restrictions on women. They need a male guardian’s permission to work or travel. Women are not allowed to become judges, and a man’s court testimony is considered twice as important as a woman’s.”
I have a bigger problem with women not being “allowed” to work or travel without male permission, being considered approximately 1/2 of a man in court testimony, and being beaten for protesting, than I do with men being allowed to have 4 wives. Maybe there’s something more to the 4wives issue than is being reported. I’m glad there were men supporting the protesting women.
June 13th, 2006 at 10:29 amLooks like we’ve exchanged Santo for IRI. Both of them are more interesting than most of the newer trolls…
Comment by Zookeeper — June 13, 2006 @ 10:20 am
I don’t think IRi was ever officially banned. He seems to be caught in that glitch like Terry the Turtle and a few others. But I’m sure his time this morning is just short lived…
I caught part of the exchange from last night with AP’s lunacy removed, so it was hard to follow. But, he’s definitely ‘off’ that one…
But I think IRI’s head probably just filled the room after heard you say that :)
June 13th, 2006 at 10:30 amI have a bigger problem with women not being “allowed†to work or travel without male permission.
Comment by Zookeeper — June 13, 2006 @ 10:29 am
Don’t even get me started…
June 13th, 2006 at 10:33 amDon’t even get me started…
Comment by unbelievable
I’d rather talk about that than GWB’s excellent adventure to Iraq or Rove, ugh, Rove…
Better get my hair dry for work, be back in 20 minutes, when I’m at work.
June 13th, 2006 at 10:37 amI am sort of glad I-Right-I is back. Why I don’t know. I think its because he is such an archetype of right winged mindless rhetoric.
June 13th, 2006 at 10:37 am#16 - “And it’s gonna be even better when you realise you still don’t have control of either.”
I never said that we would be in control, I only stated that the Republicans would have fewer seats. Are you putting words in my mouth? I thought you were above that sort of thing, Squeegeeboo. I guess I have to re-evaluate your ethics and morals.
“So the left gets mad when we don’t pull the troops out, but then we start pulling the troops out and replacing them with mercs, and the left is still mad?”
First error you made: “we start pulling the troops out”. We have not started pulling troops out to replace them with mercenaries. Second error you made: “jobs that in previous conflicts have been done by the military.” What part of “jobs that in previous conflicts” did you skip over?
I much prefer that the responsibility be held to accountable standards. When yuo have the Iraqi government unable to prosecute non-iraqi non-military offenders, do you honestly think these merc’s will give a flying f#@& if they intentionally target innocent people? If you do, then I’ve got some prime water-front real estate in Florida that you’ll be interested in buying. You can’t see it before hand, but that won’t be a problem if you’re THAT trusting.
June 13th, 2006 at 10:45 am“Are you putting words in my mouth? I thought you were above that sort of thing, Squeegeeboo. I guess I have to re-evaluate your ethics and morals.”
Wowsa, it’s just politics, you guys need to learn to take it less seriously, its only your life thats affected by their decisions. And the you in this case was anouther of my broad sweeping generalizations of the left.
“I have a bigger problem with women not being “allowed†to work or travel without male permission.”
June 13th, 2006 at 11:02 amI fail to see the problem.
“Lucrative U.S. government contracts go to firms called on to provide security for projects and personnel — jobs that in previous conflicts have been done by the military.â€â€
So the left gets mad when we don’t pull the troops out, but then we start pulling the troops out and replacing them with mercs, and the left is still mad?
Comment by squegeeboo — June 13, 2006 @ 10:21 am
you are a very dim bulb… and shortsighted to boot…
June 13th, 2006 at 11:05 amthose “security” jobs SHOULD still be done by the militay, and the money used to pay them a living wage - NOT set up our military to guard the contractors who make 10x the money…
the troops are NOT being pulled out, but the mercs sent in are getting rich - at taxpayer expense - that doesn’t piss YOU off?
katy, remember what I told you about Squeegy the other day?
June 13th, 2006 at 11:11 amDon’t let him get you too worked up. ;)
let a silly immature snobby punk get me too worked up?
June 13th, 2006 at 11:20 amah ha ha ha ha… not to worry…
#22 - “And the you in this case was anouther of my broad sweeping generalizations of the left.”
Ahh! I see. Broad sweeping generalizations are acceptable to you. (And I’m not talking about the heavy set female doing the sweeping. ;-)
Well, then why do you take such umbrage when the left makes broad sweeping generalizations of the right / conservatives? Is this another one of those “it’s OK for me to do it, but you can’t” type of arguments? What’s the other term for that? Oh, it’s hypocrisy.
By the way, I much prefer to “argue’ with you than “Right between the I’s” any day. He is so caught up in his own perfection that his hubris is blinding his judgment.
June 13th, 2006 at 11:23 am“that doesn’t piss YOU off?”
It’s very hard to piss me off, pretty much just welfare abuse, beyond that it’s all fun and games.
June 13th, 2006 at 11:30 amThink Progress thinks IRI is spam. He can post four or five messages and that is it… you can exhale Big Papa.
June 13th, 2006 at 11:31 am#27 - That’s our Squeegy — not caught up in his own perfection.
June 13th, 2006 at 11:31 amI fail to see the problem.
Comment by squegeeboo — June 13, 2006 @ 11:02 am
Happens when every woman in Rochester has a restraining order against you… All you can see are men.
June 13th, 2006 at 11:32 am“Oh, it’s hypocrisy.”
It’s only hypocrisy when DDH’s do it, when conservatives do it, its for the good of the nation.
Katy
June 13th, 2006 at 11:35 am“those “security†jobs SHOULD still be done by the militay”
So then you support keeping troops in iraq as long as necissary? What a pleasant change from most people here.
“Happens when every woman in Rochester has a restraining order against you… All you can see are men.”
I got Tundra, I don’t need women.
June 13th, 2006 at 11:37 am#31 - DDH’s??? “Dumb Ditto Heads”??? ;-)
If you weren’t so conservative, I’d ask you out! You make me laugh, and it’s not (always) at you, but with you.
You’ll find this one amusing: all my friends from when I lived in Virginia think I’m the most conservative person they know! Go figure.
June 13th, 2006 at 11:39 amDDH-Damn Dirty Hippy, but I only use it endearingly.
And that is amusing, you have a political epihany or are your friends just crazy?
June 13th, 2006 at 11:43 amdon’t put words in my mouth, punk… but i realize that we gotta fix what we broke - but it HAS to be a UN effort cause WE are only causing more trouble by being there…
June 13th, 2006 at 11:45 ambut this shows your ignorant, no, stupid, hypocricy:
It’s very hard to piss me off, pretty much just welfare abuse, beyond that it’s all fun and games.
Comment by squegeeboo — June 13, 2006 @ 11:30 am
this OCCUPATION is all about CORPORATE WELFARE -
death and destruction to enrich the MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX
#34 - To use the words from a less-than-stable poster, they’re so “left” you’d have to look over your right shoulder to see them coming at you! ;-)
Actually, it was my insistence that the First Amendment didn’t trump the Second Amendment simply because of the order they were put in the Constitution. Also, while I support a woman’s right to choose, I still think that abortion is the wrong choice. The difference is that you can be anti-abortion and still be pro-choice. You cannot be pro-choice and anti-choice at the same time. ;-) (Like my switching of the rhetoric to fit my political perspective?!?!?)
June 13th, 2006 at 11:57 am“You make me laugh, and it’s not (always) at you, but with you.”
Thanks. I do what I can to inject humor into the political discourse, laugh at me or with me, just don’t stop laughing, thats when the bitterness sets in.
June 13th, 2006 at 11:57 am(Like my switching of the rhetoric to fit my political perspective?!?!?)
It made my head hurt. And how would the first ammendment trump the second one? As for abortion, I’m against it, but if its not my kid, go ahead and kill it.
June 13th, 2006 at 12:07 pm#37 - “just don’t stop laughing, thats when the bitterness sets in.”
So THAT’S what happened to “Right between the I’s”! I always wondered why he is such a hateful and bitter man.
#38 - “And how would the first ammendment trump the second one?” It doesn’t. My friends were of the belief that gun’s should be outlawed. I disagree. Not that I’m some “happiness is a warm handgun” kind of freak! Nor am I the “sniper guns should be legal” nutcase you hear at the local NRA meetings. I just want to be ready to defend myself when the theocrats take over the Republican party in America and come to get me. ;-)
June 13th, 2006 at 12:13 pm#40 - Dem Soldier, I’ve never been a gun person, just never felt the need. It’s only been since the wiretapping crap hit the fan that I’ve thought I should have a gun — just in case things go bad in a hurry. I’ve never felt that way before, and it gives me so much grief now.
June 13th, 2006 at 12:18 pmjust don’t stop laughing, thats when the bitterness sets in.
Comment by squegeeboo
Squeegy, I think that’s the most profound thing you’ve ever said here.
June 13th, 2006 at 12:20 pmWow.
She/he who laughs, lasts.
“Squeegy, I think that’s the most profound thing you’ve ever said here.”
Thanks, normally I’m deep like a shallow well.
June 13th, 2006 at 12:23 pmOf course locals in St Andrews don’t know or care about Delay’s Junket…
Have any of you ever been to St Andrews? It’s a small town. It has a University and a Golf Course. The University is one of the prestigious Scottish ones (it has more Oxford/Cambridge rejects than any other Scottish University) and I suspect the number of Students is at least equal to the population of the town. The Town has a cinema again… It was closed for most of my childhood. There is almost nothing to do there. LAst time I was there you could Golf, Drink or walk along the sea cliffs…. No real leisure opportunities to speak of.
For those who know it I would say that St Andrews is similar in size to La Grande, Oregon….
Z.
June 13th, 2006 at 12:31 pmyou’re not just shallow, squeeg, you’re a wuss…
June 13th, 2006 at 12:38 pmignore me if you want, but your lack of response is even more telling…
Karl Zinsmeister is chief domestic policy adviser, along with being an extremly ignorant individual.
June 13th, 2006 at 12:44 pm“don’t put words in my mouth, punk”
I didn’t I paraphrased.
“this OCCUPATION is all about CORPORATE WELFARE -
June 13th, 2006 at 12:48 pmdeath and destruction to enrich the MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX”
Your crazy?
I got Tundra, I don’t need women.
Comment by squegeeboo — June 13, 2006 @ 11:37 am
Does HE know this? Haven’t seen him around. Did he quit TP?
What happens when you want someone to do your laundry and cook your dinner and spit out a baseball team of spawn like a good little repugnicant semen recpticle? Kidnap one? Become Mormon?
June 13th, 2006 at 12:51 pm“Haven’t seen him around. Did he quit TP?”
Yah, he quit for the most part.
“someone to do your laundry ”
If that happens I’ve hit the pinnacle of lazyness and don’t deserve someone to do it
“cook your dinner”
All the ladies my age burn water. Apparently cooking is a dying skill set, but I try and keep my skills up there.
“spit out a baseball team”
June 13th, 2006 at 12:59 pmI’ll just talk some random girl out of an abortion and adopt, maybe I can even turn it into a feel good TV movie. :)
I paraphrased.
Comment by squegeeboo — June 13, 2006 @ 12:48 pm
no, you didn’t… your language skills are truly pathetic
Your crazy?
Comment by squegeeboo — June 13, 2006 @ 12:48 pm
no, i’m not… but YOU are an ignorant, selfish punk -
June 13th, 2006 at 1:08 pmand as such, will get no more of my time or thoughts
katy is HOT today.
June 13th, 2006 at 1:23 pm“no, you didn’t… your language skills are truly pathetic”
You Said:
“those “security†jobs SHOULD still be done by the militay”
If they should be done by the military, that would mean that you think the military should still be in Iraq. And it stands to reason that if you think the military should still be in Iraq you want them there until the mission is accomplished, otherwise it means your just supporting the killing of our troops, and their killing of Iraqis, for no reason if you want them pulled out at a later date before success.
June 13th, 2006 at 1:25 pmYah, he quit for the most part.
Why?
If that happens I’ve hit the pinnacle of lazyness and don’t deserve someone to do it
Your liberal mother at least got in one liberal value…
All the ladies my age burn water. Apparently cooking is a dying skill set, but I try and keep my skills up there.
All? So there are zero women your age who can cook? Only men in culinary institutions now, eh? Don’t be silly.
I’ll just talk some random girl out of an abortion and adopt, maybe I can even turn it into a feel good TV movie. :)
Comment by squegeeboo — June 13, 2006 @ 12:59 pm
There are over 100,000 kids in foster care right now. You could one or two without the 9 month waiting period…
No sex? I mean you neocons don’t believe in non-marital sex (well, unless you’re having an affair with another married person…). Or is that where the Agnosticism comes in tandy?
June 13th, 2006 at 1:26 pmThanks, normally I’m deep like a shallow well.
Comment by squegeeboo
I know.
June 13th, 2006 at 1:36 pmLa Grande, Oregon….
Z.
Love it, love it…
June 13th, 2006 at 1:38 pm“Your liberal mother at least got in one liberal value…”
Self-reliance? Thats conservative all the way, if I was liberal I’d be trying to get the state to come wash my stuff :)
“So there are zero women your age who can cook?”
Saddly all the ones I know, and I offer to help them learn, and they all would rather be lazy and not learn a life-skill(maybe its just cause of my personality)
Direct Qoute from the T man himself
June 13th, 2006 at 1:40 pm“Well I quit because I have work to do LOL, well that and I’d rather spend my time helping charities than bitching that noone does (How’s that sound)?”
And currently he is actually putting together a charity golf turny, so his monies are in his mouth on that one.
Saddly all the ones I know, and I offer to help them learn, and they all would rather be lazy and not learn a life-skill(maybe its just cause of my personality)
Comment by squegeeboo
For an excuse, it’s up there with some of the better ones.
June 13th, 2006 at 1:44 pmJust sayin’
Squeegy, how is the fat man challenge comeing? Got your $50?
June 13th, 2006 at 1:46 pmSelf-reliance? Thats conservative all the way, if I was liberal I’d be trying to get the state to come wash my stuff :)
Not it’s not. It’s conservative men who keep ‘housewives’, and consider women theweaker sex who are supposed to breed and wash things. You taking care of yourself is very liberal.
Saddly all the ones I know, and I offer to help them learn, and they all would rather be lazy and not learn a life-skill(maybe its just cause of my personality)
And you couldn’t go meet different ones? You have some limit on the number of twenty-something women you can know?
Maybe because of those misogynistic comments. The ones worth knowing wouldn’t lower themselves to feed your ideology…
“Well I quit because I have work to do LOL, well that and I’d rather spend my time helping charities than bitching that noone does (How’s that sound)?â€
And currently he is actually putting together a charity golf turny, so his monies are in his mouth on that one.
Comment by squegeeboo — June 13, 2006 @ 1:40 pm
He’s a good guy. Tell him we said hello and way to go!
Guess he couldn’t recruit you? Conflict with frisbees?
I’ve put off my trip to New York, (and Seattle). I just have way too much to do before school starts. I’m working a lot on getting my program together for the Fall. Mostly having to brush up on or learn aspects I want to teach but wasn’t taught myself…
June 13th, 2006 at 1:50 pmZoo
It was going well had my buddy by about 10, and final weigh in is July 1st, but I fubared my ankle in Ultimate on sunday, so I can’t exercise properly for about 1-2 weeks, and thats assuming its just a horrible sprain, not a break (which I find out later today). All in all though, I should still squeak into the win.
“For an excuse, it’s up there with some of the better ones.”
June 13th, 2006 at 1:51 pmI don’t even offer to help for the date angle, I really just want to teach people the basics on cooking, thats the saddest part.
“Guess he couldn’t recruit you?”
I’m signed up as a volunteer, but they say they don’t need me for the planning stage, just the working the event stage.
June 13th, 2006 at 1:52 pmI don’t even offer to help for the date angle, I really just want to teach people the basics on cooking, thats the saddest part.
Comment by squegeeboo — June 13, 2006 @ 1:51 pm
In all the years that I have taken classes there have never been more than three straight men in any of them… Mostly women. There are cooking classes you could take to meet women interested in cooking… Or you could just get over tradition and be the one who cooks for her… While maybe she does something else for you…???
June 13th, 2006 at 1:55 pmSqueegy, sorry about the ankle, hope it’s not broken.
June 13th, 2006 at 2:30 pmFrisbeein’ is hard work.
“Squeegy, sorry about the ankle, hope it’s not broken.
Frisbeein’ is hard work.”
Turns out its two small Avulsion fractures, so not good, but not horrible, thats what I get for playing after the first time I rolled the ankle, but couldn’t let the team down.
June 13th, 2006 at 3:20 pmAvulsion fracture, also known as “dancer’s fracture.” Apparently not a graceful dancer’s fracture, but there you have it. Take it easy and just let it heal. Such a hero, playing injured for the team. I hope they’re bringing you dinner. ;)
June 13th, 2006 at 4:24 pm“playing injured for the team. ”
I had to, they helped me paint my house friday to make sure I could make it.
“Take it easy and just let it heal.”
June 13th, 2006 at 4:57 pmSo no game tonight? :( Hopefully by next week I’ll be back in the action.
Hopefully by next week I’ll be back in the action.
Comment by squegeeboo
Geez…
June 13th, 2006 at 6:02 pmUnbelievable, it’s not just premarital sex repugs abhor, they even disdain marital sex.
June 13th, 2006 at 6:19 pm#69 - It makes them all sweaty and giggly, and they hate that.
June 13th, 2006 at 6:23 pm[…] Think Progress […]
June 13th, 2006 at 11:47 pmGolf Usa
I enjoyed reading your blog. It is so interesting reading other peoples personal take on a subject.
March 14th, 2008 at 8:49 pmLagina
like free spirits in the presence of fate is strength undefeatable.
March 16th, 2008 at 12:20 amGay Incest Old Gay Men Gay Male Galleries
I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view
March 21st, 2008 at 2:25 amGregory
Great work. I am going to pass this along.
March 27th, 2008 at 12:11 amSex Girls Having Sex Rough Sex
I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view
March 31st, 2008 at 4:14 amSex Free Sex Pictures Office Sex
I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view
April 1st, 2008 at 6:34 pmsex massage
Good post. I am looking into these issues on my blog.
April 3rd, 2008 at 6:28 pmPee Public Pee Public Pissing
I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view
April 4th, 2008 at 6:56 pmEric
The most comprehensive info I have found on this subject on the net. Will be back soon to follow up.
April 6th, 2008 at 8:08 amPee Female Pee Pee Hole
I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view
April 7th, 2008 at 7:52 pm