ThinkFast PM: June 13, 2006
ThinkFast PM: June 13, 2006
Did Karl Rove make a deal with Fitzgerald “under which he gets a pass from prosecution in exchange for his continuing cooperation in the Plame investigation? Rove spokesman Mark Corallo says no. … ‘There is no deal. Period.‘”
Josh Marshall gives his take on Rove being cleared: “[N]ot only am I happy to take Fitzgerald’s word for it, if this is in fact the case, good for Fitzgerald. A prosecutor’s role is not to punish people for malicious acts. It is to ascertain whether they’ve committed specific criminal acts and determine whether there is sufficient evidence to sustain a charge.”
After a strong response to his post questioning why panels about labor weren’t very popular at YearlyKos, labor blogger Nathan Newman writes an “inspiring” essay, “Why Unions? Labor 101.”
More fallout from Bush’s go-it-alone foreign policy. Kevin Drum cites the latest Pew numbers about how American are viewed around the world. “There’s not much good news here,” he says.
An Ohio bill that would have banned abortion in all cases — including in cases of rape or incest and even if the life of the woman’s life was endangered — is “expected to be placed back in a file cabinet and left to die at the end of the year.”
The Agonist reminds us that a knowledge of history is essential to formulating good foreign policy. “The value it provides is similar to the value stock charts and earnings histories provide investors and how a person’s family medical history informs her doctor. … Indeed, history won’t tell you where you are going, but it will help you understand how you got there. … We ignore history too much in this country and we (and others) suffer because of it.”
And finally: Congratulations to Cher, who has graduated from her 4:30am call-ins to CSPAN to an actual guest appearance on Washington Journal.
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog Roll
I would sincerely doubt that Rove would turn on either bush or Cheney. If rove had been indicted and convicted, he has a get out of jail free card in the form of a presidential pardon. I doubt that he ever worried about spending time in jail.
June 13th, 2006 at 6:37 pmA good blogwhoring post is never out of style. Pay close attention to the Digby link that treats this affair with… a notable and typical lack of subtlety.
June 13th, 2006 at 6:55 pmRove is in the clear, according to his attorney.
June 13th, 2006 at 7:38 pmWhat has Fitzgerald said? Is there an official exoneration? Rove’s lawyer has made this announcement; the prosecutor has been silent. After all this time and five appearances before the grand jury, it’s over with this announcement by his attorney?
I doubt Rove flipped on Cheney or anyone in the white house.
Is there something under seal? Will this lead to a civil suit?
I think it’s fair to assume there wasn’t sufficient evidence to indict Rove. I’m sure he’s as innocent as OJ /sarcasm off
June 13th, 2006 at 7:40 pm“the life of the woman’s life”
June 13th, 2006 at 7:53 pmI had a laugh at this one. In response to Jonah Goldberg’s (ball-licking) question of “Where does Rove report to get his reputation back?” – Andrew Sullivan responds “He might start in South Carolina.”
You know, Jonah, that state where your beloved’s true colors were on such fine display?
June 13th, 2006 at 7:57 pmLooks like Dick Cheney’s not not the only one who benefited from Hurricane Katrina.
Ladies and gentlemen, your tax dollars hard at work. All 1.4 billion of them.
June 13th, 2006 at 8:16 pmI think it’s fair to assume there wasn’t sufficient evidence to indict Rove. I’m sure he’s as innocent as OJ /sarcasm off
Comment by DrSinker — June 13, 2006 @ 7:40 pm
That’s a good point. If what he did wasn’t up to the level of legal charges, it still has a stink about it. But, it seems that this admistration has stock in Lysol.
June 13th, 2006 at 8:31 pm#2 – Great roundup, jurrassicpork. How did you decide on the name “jurrasicpork,” anyway?
June 13th, 2006 at 8:34 pm#8 – Right, Mr Tim, Fitz apparently decided he wouldn’t be able to convict Rove, but that doesn’t mean Rove didn’t actually do those things.
June 13th, 2006 at 8:37 pmLike others I will suspend judgement until I hear that Rove is off the hook from Fitzgerald himself. I would not believe anything a Rove lawyer has to say.
June 13th, 2006 at 8:55 pmAl Gore is on Larry King right now.
June 13th, 2006 at 8:58 pmDid Karl Rove make a deal with Fitzgerald “under which he gets a pass from prosecution in exchange for his continuing cooperation in the Plame investigation? Rove spokesman Mark Corallo says no. … ‘There is no deal. Period.‘â€
I guess I knew all along it was too good to be true, for Rove to be busted. Rove is eating Fois Gras and laughing loudly.
Josh Marshall gives his take on Rove being cleared: “[N]ot only am I happy to take Fitzgerald’s word for it, if this is in fact the case, good for Fitzgerald. A prosecutor’s role is not to punish people for malicious acts. It is to ascertain whether they’ve committed specific criminal acts and determine whether there is sufficient evidence to sustain a charge.â€
All prosecuters should follow this.
More fallout from Bush’s go-it-alone foreign policy. Kevin Drum cites the latest Pew numbers about how American are viewed around the world. “There’s not much good news here,†he says.
Gosh no kidding, hey I still would choose to live in the US over any other, however, we also need to get over ourselves, get out more, turn off the TV once in a while.
An Ohio bill that would have banned abortion in all cases — including in cases of rape or incest and even if the life of the woman’s life was endangered — is “expected to be placed back in a file cabinet and left to die at the end of the year.â€
That’s because the majority of people are not interested in this.
The Agonist reminds us that a knowledge of history is essential to formulating good foreign policy. “The value it provides is similar to the value stock charts and earnings histories provide investors and how a person’s family medical history informs her doctor. … Indeed, history won’t tell you where you are going, but it will help you understand how you got there. … We ignore history too much in this country and we (and others) suffer because of it.â€
Awe quit being such a cry baby, boo freaking hoo. Actually, how much is human nature to ignore history? Or is it that history majors just don’t pay well?
And finally: Congratulations to Cher, who has graduated from her 4:30am call-ins to CSPAN to an actual guest appearance on Washington Journal.
Is there really life after love
June 13th, 2006 at 9:23 pmI’m a closet Cher fan.
June 13th, 2006 at 10:03 pmI guess I knew all along it was too good to be true, for Rove to be busted. Rove is eating Fois Gras and laughing loudly.
It’s easy to choke on foie gras…
All prosecuters should follow this.
Good ones do, others, not so much.
Gosh no kidding, hey I still would choose to live in the US over any other, however, we also need to get over ourselves, get out more, turn off the TV once in a while.
Damn right, we are not the only people on this planet! This proud American is about to take the dog for a long walk, because she misses her boy.
That’s because the majority of people are not interested in this.
Nobody’s business but the woman and her doc.
Awe quit being such a cry baby, boo freaking hoo. Actually, how much is human nature to ignore history? Or is it that history majors just don’t pay well?
There’s just so much more history every day! Waaaaaah!
Is there really life after love
Comment by For Truth
Yes, god yes, to love again…
June 13th, 2006 at 10:03 pmGood for CSPAN. I can already imagine their
June 13th, 2006 at 10:06 pmfonts: Gypsies 1-800-555-1212, tramps 1-800-555-1213 and thieves 1-800-555-1214. Remember the
30 day rule.
So Karl Rove is the President’s key advisor? Was it his advice to invade a sovereign, third world country unprovoked? Was it his advice to kill an American city? Was it his advice to send the nation into bankruptcy? Did he advise the President to appoint Harriet Myers? Did his advice put us in a position to lose Iraq along with 2500 America deaths? This is the advice Bush needs? No wonder he’s at 33% approval. What a f*cking circus.
June 13th, 2006 at 10:34 pmAt Huffpo:
AP: “The Decision Not To Charge Karl Rove Shows There Often Are No Consequences For Misleading The Public”…
My reply at Huffpo:
What a nutty freakin thing to say. I see the media and the pundits coming down on Patrick Fitzgerald when nobody knows what’s going on in this “ongoing investigation.”
Can anyone in the media explain what the hell “Sealed v Sealed” is? How many times in all of American history has there ever been a “Sealed v Sealed?”
At YK, Joe Wilson expressed his faith in career officials like Patrick J. Fitzgerald to keep this nation secure even from this particular neocon power grab.
If Fitz is good enough for Joe Wilson, I’ll wait patiently until this very capable US Attorney and his dedicated assistants finish their work, and make their statement. Luskin be damned.
There must be 50 Ways To Dump The Dubya!
June 13th, 2006 at 10:49 pmI expected that Fitzgerald would back down on indicting Karl Rove, because he was muscled to back off! He is not the first prosecutor in America to be threatened by thugs, but it will result in the end of his career as a respected attorney! Nobody will believe anything that Fitzgerald does now because he has been compromised! He made his choice to allow criminality by Rove to not be prosecuted > shame on Fitzgerald!
June 13th, 2006 at 10:58 pmI thought Al Gore was good on Larry King. I really don’t think he’s going to run for president again. He said it was correct to go into Afghanistan to get bin Laden, but completely wrong to pull troops away from that search to go into Iraq. Larry King can ask some really silly questions sometimes, but he did ok tonight.
June 13th, 2006 at 11:13 pm#19 – Jay, I can’t help thinking there’s more to come on what happened with Rove.
June 13th, 2006 at 11:15 pmRove today:
Never one to let the facts or delicious irony stand in the way of a vicious political smear, today Karl Rove took a swipe at war heros Sen. John Kerry and Rep. John Murtha, stating, “They may be with you for the first few bullets but they won’t be there for the last tough battles.”
Cocky little bastard, ain’t he?
June 13th, 2006 at 11:21 pmPost 21 I remember a prosecutor once saying on TV that a Grand Jury can indict a tuna fish sandwich if the charges are presented properly to them! Fitzgerald most likely got compromised months ago, so agreed to just act like he was investigating Rove, when in fact he already made the decision to NOT indict him! The Bush Regime has powerful friends, so they probably investigated Fitzgerald, and found a skeletin in his closet to blackmail him to lay off Rove, and more importantly to drop any thoughts of going after Dubya or Dicky!
June 13th, 2006 at 11:37 pm#23
How about Fitzgerald not having any evidence to indict him on any wrong doing? I know its simple but maybe simple minds like yourself could understand that. Everyone here has forgotten that in this country you are innocent until proven guilty. I personally think that whole thing is just a witch hunt as payback for Clinton’s impeachment, which was his own doing. All Libby had to do was tell the truth in a consistent manner which is how he got himself into this mess.
June 13th, 2006 at 11:52 pmPost 24 Randy > Lol I will not take the bait to get in a fight with you on here, but your believing that Rove is innocent, of any charges, is being simple minded! There is plenty of evidence to indict Rove, but Fitzgerald does not have the balls to do it > PERIOD.
June 13th, 2006 at 11:58 pmso, ken mehlman was on the Daily Show tonight… once again, jon was in good form… and good natured as possible… mehlman didn’t stop grinning either… jon started by asking about the job and said: “you’re the guy who has to spray perfume on these turds” … that was great!
at the end, jon asked mehlman to come back to the show with this: “i hope that when the administration is done you can come back here and tell us what they were really doing”
comedy central always posts these interviews – worth a look if you missed the show
June 14th, 2006 at 12:13 amjay randal – i sure hope you get to eat your words… but i wonder if you would…
June 14th, 2006 at 12:26 ami’d especially like to see sources and references for all your accusations – too much knee-jerkin’ in my opinion… hard to take it serious… i know you mean well though – keep trying…
I am so sick of people getting away with crimes in ourcountry. OJ, Michael Jackson Bush invading Iraq… and Rove gets away with TREASON! Can anyone tell me why I’m supposed to be so proud of what our country stands for when our citizens get away with such heinious crimes??? (rhetorical question)
June 14th, 2006 at 12:28 amHow can we call ourselves Americans when we allow for such heinous crimes to be commited? Every OJ, every Ken Lay, every Rove… is cheapening the value of being an American. Can we ever stop these crimes? And if we cannot, why are we so damn proud of ourselves?
June 14th, 2006 at 12:31 amRove today: “They may be with you for the first few bullets but they won’t be there for the last tough battles.â€
Cocky little bastard, ain’t he?
Comment by Zookeeper — June 13, 2006 @ 11:21 pm
zookeeper – randi rhodes was talking about this today – his speech was especially egregious as he himself was never in the military:
“Except for a lapse of several months, Selective Service records show presidential adviser Karl Rove escaped the draft for nearly three years at the height of the Vietnam War using student deferments…”
imagine that…
June 14th, 2006 at 12:37 amkaty I have never seen you post a fact on anything on here > lol. If you are a Bush supporter, then I truely feel sorry for you?! If you are anti-Bush, then not a good idea to attack others who dislike him like me?!
June 14th, 2006 at 12:42 amAs for Patrick Fitzgerald: he is a registered Republican, so I always have believed it odd for any Democrat or Progressive to trust the man?! It should not surprise anyone that he turned out to be a lousy prosecutor > plenty of them in the United States! Ken Starr was the worst one!
June 14th, 2006 at 12:53 amIf Treason Occurs, But Everyone Pretends It Didn’t, Is It Still Treason?
There is something rotten in Beltwayistan. I know you are not surprised.
This morning, the US mainstream news media is reporting that Karl Rove “will not be indicted†in the investigation into the outing of Valerie Plame. Of course, the story only quotes Rove’s lawyer, who has no credibility in speaking for Fitzgerald. And, of course, if Rove had already been indicted, which as I wrote yesterday I believe, it would be factual (in a Clintonesque way) to say he will “not be indicted.â€
But the US mainstream news media is also reporting this morning that Fitzgerald does not expect the White House to fight him on seeking Cheney’s testimony in the trial of Libby. Tit for tat? And what if he has to take the Fifth on the stand? That would be ironic — Cheney wrapping himself in the Bill of Rights.
Do not be surprised if Cheney resigns for health reasons before the end of the year. Do not be surprised if Libby ends up changing his plea, and never goes to trial. My guess is that Rove has turned, to save himself from the indictment that was handed down, and to give Bush a boost in his political makeover. And, of course, there will be pardons before Bush leaves office – IF they are even necessary, and IF he ever leaves office.
Jane Hamsher, FIREDOGLAKE, posted this compelling analysis, “Hey, Bob, where’s your letter,” this afternoon –
This isn’t over yet.
Richard Power
June 14th, 2006 at 12:59 amhttp://words-of-power.blogspot.com
http://www.wordsofpower.net
Last comment for me on TP tonight > this site and its threads are about posting opinions on political topics! Some on here like to post links to articles or other blog sites! Bush lover trolls come on here to pick fights and to gum up the threads! Some come on here because they are lonely and the Internet is a safe place to converse without revealing one’s identity! Some like myself post on here to undermine the criminal Bush Regime and to reveal their machinations to deceive the American citizenry! Also some come on here because they are bored and really have nothing of importance to contribute! Have a nice evening/morning everyone!
June 14th, 2006 at 1:09 amIf Rove’s next move is to get involved with the upcoming election, and the Republican battle to hang onto their jobs, he needs to resign from his job. A White House staffer, famous for his tactics, and not for positive reasons, has no business collecting a government paycheck, (paid for by our tax dollars) while working for the Republican Party. Let them support his worthless ass. But this ‘barnacle’ will be hard to scrape off.
June 14th, 2006 at 2:05 amThere’s a new Feature at Fox News!
You get the chance to “whisper in Bush’s ear”, “give him advice on what is plaguing the nation”. You even get to tell Bush “what you would do if you were President”
Hysterical. I am not kidding. Check it out.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,199262,00.html
Desperate for ideas Fox on how to get your beloved leader’s pathetic approval ratings out of the proverbial toilet?…And off the list as One of the Worst President’s Ever and ‘THE Worst President in the last 60 years’? ..and to change the fact that 3 out of 4 Americans say that the country is worst off now than it was before Bush became President?..and away from the 3 main words a majority of Americans use to describe Bush..’incompetent’, ‘dishonest’, ‘idiot’ ?
***Isn’t this actually a complete and blatent show of no-confidence in Karl Rove, Ken Mehlman and Fox News themselves ?! *****
June 14th, 2006 at 2:12 amA prosecutor’s role is not to punish people for malicious acts. It is to ascertain whether they’ve committed specific criminal acts and determine whether there is sufficient evidence to sustain a charge.â€
So if I slice my neighbors tires? or maybe throw weed seed unto his yard, thats Ok? What if I wrote, with a gas can, you suck, on his grass, or maybe put a potato in his muffler and his missed a days work, and this asshat just so happened to be say Mr Delay.
June 14th, 2006 at 3:38 amMe thinks,perhaps stupidly, that I would go to jail, cuffed and stuffed for at least 24 hrs. Why then was this prosecutor, whose role was to be and not looking to punish me for malacious acts?
Why and why not do I get this same treatment?
Am I less a human than another man?
Am I a American or Am I not?
Why do I go to jail for a malicious act and not this man or woman? Is he or is he not an American Citizen before he or she attained the position of office? Does then the position of office exclude one from the law? How SO?
Are they not only citizen such as you?
KARL THE COWARD:
KARL THE COWARD:
Shot:
“They may be with you for the first few bullets but they won’t be there for the last tough battles.”
– Karl Rove, on John Kerry and John Murtha, Reuters, 6/13
Chaser:
“Except for a lapse of several months, Selective Service records show presidential adviser Karl Rove escaped the draft for nearly three years at the height of the Vietnam War using student deferments. ” [Walsh, Salt Lake Tribune, 9/18/2004]
Rove’s (non-)draft history includes a period where he claimed a student deferment even though he had dropped out of school.
LINK:
June 14th, 2006 at 3:46 amhttp://www.senatemajority.com/node/381
Re: the Ohio abortion ban:
It is on the shelf UNLESS Raga and Blackwell get elected. Then it will be OFF the shelf again. The campaign is running from this thing like the plague. Strickland needs to force the R’s to declare their intention re: abortion. If they don’t it will be a huge failure in their campaign. The GOP operatives in Ohio know this is a losing issue for them, just as TEL was, which was why they have manuevered to get it off the ballot (even though it was Blackwell himself who put it there).
Dems better get on the offensive in Ohio or it will be over.
June 14th, 2006 at 7:06 am#33
Wait a minute, I thought about nine months ago when the Libby indictment was being handed down, the left had a kinds of praise for Fitzgerald, calling him a “prosecutor’s prosecutor”. Now that he didn’t think he had enough evidence to seek an indictment, you think he is lousy. Why can’t you just accept the fact that there just wasn’t enough evidence or that there could be someone who actually “outed” Plame? My bet is that it was Wilson himself.
June 14th, 2006 at 7:17 amThis must be a really tough day for many of you. I mean you guys had Rove behind bars! Now no indictment—you have my condolences.
June 14th, 2006 at 8:17 amFunny Stuff! The left is funnier that Comedy Central….I think I’ll cancel cable and just watch lefties chase their tales…
June 14th, 2006 at 8:26 am#24 – “I personally think that whole thing is just a witch hunt as payback for Clinton’s impeachment”
Which was payback for forcing Fmr. Pres. Nixon to resign before he could be impeached. Which was payback for Fmr. Pres. Ford losing to Fmr. Pres. Carter. Which was payback for Fmr. Prs. Kennedy being shot in the head. How far back do you want to go, silly boy?
By the way, now that the investigation is over, maybe they’ll answer the question: You said you’d fire anyone who leaked information. Rove admitted that he was a source for the leaking of classified information, so when will you be true to your word and fire Rove?
June 14th, 2006 at 8:39 amif you put all these morons in a sack and just started blindly beating the sack, well…you would hit the right one everytime
June 14th, 2006 at 8:46 am#41 – Yeah, but now we have a President that’s been caught in yet another lie: “The President has set high standards, the highest of standards for people in his administration. He’s made it very clear to people in his administration that he expects them to adhere to the highest standards of conduct. If anyone in this administration was involved in it, they would no longer be in this administration.”
So, when will Rove leave the administration? Or did Pres. Bush lie yet again?
Oh wait. The president flip-flopped YET AGAIN! He decided to change his criteria for anyone being fired when he found out that Rove was the one who did it. Can’t have any standards, or all the Republicans in office would have to leave due to their inability to maintain ethics or morals.
June 14th, 2006 at 8:49 ami’ve seen mop buckets that were smarter than #45
June 14th, 2006 at 8:54 amFor ALL you TREASONOUS inbred Bushites…
…who have been crowing about yourselves and your god Bushiva having “WON”…
…because his dog Rove(r) escaped prosecution…
…I say THIS is what you’ve “WON”:
“Favorable views of the United States dropped sharply over the past year in Spain, where only 23 percent said they had a positive opinion, down from 41 percent last year, according to the survey.”
-NYT-
June 14th, 2006 at 9:00 amNever-ending list of what the Bush Administration was/is wrong about in Iraq:
“Mission Accomplished”
Mis-use of intelligence, disregarding evidence against your claims
telling Americans Saddam was linked to 9/11
not having an actual plan for the peace
disbanding their army,
not anticipating an insurgency
saying that the Oil in Iraq would pay for the war
claiming that we would be greated with candy and flowers as liberators
how much the war would cost,
the Iraqi’s would pay for their own reconstruction,
to knowing nothing about Iraqi customs
how we ‘found the Weapons of Mass Destruction’
how many troops would be necessary
Oil would increase enormously as a result of your invasion
to how long the War would last
to the insurgency being “in it’s last throes”
Not finding an occupation necessary
Saddam’s ousting would result in a safer, happier Iraq
Gross under-estimation of how many US Troops would be killed
to how elections would make everything better
thinking troops would not end up with PTSD
to thinking the wawr would stabilize the Middle East
to how Saddam’s trial would rally American support of the War
to having to use at least 7 rationales for the invasion/the War after the WMD weren’t there
to how electricity would be restored to pre-war levels (they only get 5-8 hours a day now)
Iraqi Security Forces would react to being told on their graduation day that they would NOT be working near their home and family as they were told would be the case
not equipping troops with the proper amount of armor
to saying people weren’t being tortured in Iraq
to saying US Troops wouldn’t have be on 2,3 and 4 tours in Iraq
failing to convince the NATO alliance that an immediate invasion was necessary
failing to build a global alliance
saying employment would rise substantially in Iraq
to putting inexperienced troops in charge of Prisons
thinking the troops want to stay in Iraq as long as it takes
(72% want out now or a year from when the survey was taken a few months ago)
thinking that Americans would see Zarqawi and al Qaeda as the main reasons for violence/bombings/attacks/executions/torture (82% of Americans say violence is the result of a civil war between sunnis and shiites)
not anticipating that Iraqis would vote for Islamic Extremists in the elections
not thinking ahead that the the US humvees would need additional armor
not bothering to understanding Iraq’s infrastructure before the invasion
to having a plastic Thanksgiving in Iraq and thinking that would rally Americans/Iraqis behind him
to thinking Karen Hughes could change hearts and minds in Iraq
to thinking the Republicans would stay behind them in strong support throughout the war
Trusting Ahmed Chalabi
Trusting ‘Curveball’
thinking the National Guard wouldn’t be necessary in Iraq
to grossly miss the reconstrution deadlines (which we set) for the Iraq people
to thinking their No Bid Contractor friends would be honest and non-corrupt
thinking the war would pump up your Neo-Con friends to invade other countries and create democracies by force
to thinking most Americans would agree with them that the media is exaggerating the violence
to thinking hammering war critics and labeling them as ‘traitors’ in A VETERAN’S DAY Speech would stop people from speaking out against the war
thinking that dropping in on a ’surprise’ visit to Iraq for 5 hours would change anything on the ground
Afghanistan:
thinking that leaving Afghanistan to focus on Iraq would not result in the Taliban and Al Qaeda re-grouping
drafting a Constitution for Afghanistan that was ‘based on our own democracy’ but had no Rights for Afghani’s to be free to practice any religion
saying women would be free after the war in Afghanistan
June 14th, 2006 at 9:00 amOnce again, I say “Rove where you want to, Rove around the world….”
June 14th, 2006 at 9:07 am#46 – And I’m supposed to care about what you think because. . . . . ???
Actually, I haven’t read a single thing you’ve written on this forum. Could it be you’re one of those panty-waists who make blog bombs and run away before you’re torn to shreds?
Most likely you are. It is representative of your lack of character and missing moral fortitude to act in such a fashion.
June 14th, 2006 at 9:23 am#49 – “…Rove where you want to! Without morals, without ethics!”
June 14th, 2006 at 9:25 am#44 – I agree. But how could we get all the morons from the Bush administration to fit into a single sack?!?!? That would have to be one HUGE sack! Have you seen how fat some of these Republi-thugs are?!?!?
June 14th, 2006 at 9:28 am…Now no indictment—you have my condolences.
Comment by Antagonist #41
Give ‘em to your “breeder” Antichrist…
…you’ve caused IT the most grief…
…having sh*t like you as the product of an obviously difficult gestation ordeal…
…must be maddening…
June 14th, 2006 at 10:13 ami feel so sorry for that dem soldier guy. how awful it must be to be so jealous of others.
June 14th, 2006 at 10:29 amNo kidding – What a bore. Therapy. Might save his life
June 14th, 2006 at 10:31 am#54 – Whatever helps you sleep at night, sweetie.
In fact, the next time your “baby J” personality takes charge, give her the message as well.
Oh, and don’t forget your lithium! It helps when you’re as confused as you two are (or more?) .
June 14th, 2006 at 10:34 amLeave him be!! Him and his ilk are the primary reason that they cannot win elections. The rest of the world needs them to keep this irrational crap going. We can hardly win without them.
June 14th, 2006 at 10:38 am#57 – So, will you say that it’s people like you and your ilk that you’re going to loose seats this coming November 8th?
Somehow, I don’t see you taking that kind of responsibility for your actions. Your elected Republicans refuse to take responsibility for their actions as well.
June 14th, 2006 at 11:05 aminteresting thought
June 14th, 2006 at 11:08 amMost of these nit-wits have never voted anyway. Would not wanna cure that with therapy
June 14th, 2006 at 11:35 am#60 – Actually, the Republican nit-wits to whom you refer vote whenever they get a-skeerd of gays or abortion! If only the Republicans had real issues on which to stand, rather than the straw-man arguments they much prefer.
June 14th, 2006 at 11:50 am#57, i believe you are absolutely right
June 14th, 2006 at 2:24 pmA limerick I wrote when Libby was indicted:
June 14th, 2006 at 5:34 pmAn indictment was ordered for Scooter
who fancied himself a great troubleshooter.
But he really committed treason
for a nefarious reason.
Yet is Rove’s case really mooter?
Bankruptcy Attorney In Detroit
Found your blog on yahoo – thanks for the article but i still don’t get it.
April 3rd, 2008 at 12:55 pmCock Dog Dick In Pussy Sucking Dick
I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view
April 13th, 2008 at 9:20 pmGay Incest Gay Cumshots Gay Jock
I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view
April 13th, 2008 at 10:55 pm