ThinkFast AM: June 14, 2006
ThinkFast AM: June 14, 2006
Pentagon officials will not include a classified section in the newly updated Army Field Manual. Descriptions of interrogation techniques initially planned for the classified section (presumed to be more aggressive) are “either being made public or are being eliminated as tactics that can be used against prisoners.â€
“Despite record low approval ratings, House lawmakers Tuesday embraced a $3,300 pay raise that would increase their salaries to $168,500.”
Part of President Bush’s PR offensive on Iraq yesterday was the announcement that 70,000 American and Iraqi troops would launch “a large-scale security sweep in Baghdad.” But an Iraqi major general acknowledged to the Washington Post that the plan “does not involve an increase in troops in the city.”
FEMA doled out $1.4 billion in bogus assistance to “victims” of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, paying for football tickets, a tropical vacation, “adult erotica products,” and “Girls Gone Wild” videos. The wrongful recipients included prison inmates and a person who used a New Orleans cemetery for a home address.
A Harvard education study has found that No Child Left Behind is “failing to close racial achievement gaps and will miss its goals by 2014 according to recent trends.†Also, the legislation has “had no significant impact on improving reading and math achievement since it was introduced in 2001, contradicting White House claims and potentially adding to concerns over America’s academic competitiveness.”
Though the neoconservative Project for a New American Century is reportedly on the verge of shutting its doors, the group “has been inactive since January 2005″ when the group’s leadership, such as William Kristol, “began attacking” fellow PNAC founder Donald Rumsfeld for his management of the Iraq war.
The AP’s Peter Yost on Rove avoiding an indictment: “The decision not to charge Karl Rove shows there often are no consequences for misleading the public. … Rove’s truth-telling to the FBI saved him from indictment. And by misleading reporters, the White House saved itself from a political liability during the 2004 presidential campaign.â€
Amnesty International urged European states to stop being “partners in crime” with the United States over the alleged kidnapping of terrorism suspects and their transfer to countries that use torture. “There is irrefutable evidence of European complicity in the unlawful practice of renditions,” Amnesty said.
In advance of next month’s G8 gathering in Russia, the world’s top scientists warned that “climate change solutions agreed at the G8 summit in Scotland a year ago risked being pushed off the agenda.â€
And finally: Last weekend, nude cyclists in San Francisco and Seattle rode in protest of “dependence on oil, automotive air pollution, and the dangers that cars pose to cyclists.†“Nakedness doesn’t seem to have much to do with dependence on cars, but one message took a stab at tying the two subjects together: ‘Stop indecent exposure to vehicle emissions!’â€
What did we miss? Let us know in the comments section.
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog Roll
“Despite record low approval ratings, House lawmakers Tuesday embraced a $3,300 pay raise that would increase their salaries to $168,500.â€
We really have to fire these people. All of them who voted for this raise after rejecting a minimum wage increase, and for the bans on gay marriage and flag burning while the country rots…
June 14th, 2006 at 9:22 am“Despite record low approval ratings, House lawmakers Tuesday embraced a $3,300 pay raise that would increase their salaries to $168,500.â€
“Kiss our collective a*ses America! We’re rich biii*cch!”
-U.S. Congress-
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!
“Ain’t No Stoppin’ Us Now”
June 14th, 2006 at 9:22 amNot the best of days today, since the Democrats in DC keep allowing Bush to stage photo ops in places like Iraq, instead of exposing him as a fraud and a creepy liar in chief! Dems in DC should yell that Bush is wasting millions of dollars to fly to Iraq for no legitimate reasons other than to boost his approval ratings by manipulating press coverage! Get some balls Democrats or the lousy Republicans will keep cheating to remain in power this November!
June 14th, 2006 at 9:25 amPart of President Bush’s PR offensive on Iraq yesterday was the announcement that 70,000 American and Iraqi troops would launch “a large-scale security sweep in Baghdad.†But an Iraqi major general acknowledged to the Washington Post that the plan “does not involve an increase in troops in the city.â€
What does an increase in troops have to do with a security sweep thru Baghdad? The two seems to be unrelated.
June 14th, 2006 at 9:26 amThe 2 percent cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) would be the seventh straight for members of the House and Senate. Lawmakers easily squelched an attempt by Rep. Jim Matheson, D-Utah, to get a direct vote to block the increase, which is automatically awarded unless lawmakers vote to block it.
Cost of living? That needs to change names to” Cost of high living”…
June 14th, 2006 at 9:27 amI can live 3 monts with the increase to the members of House and Senate! Maybe lawmakers have years of 15 monts? An increase linked to productivity or country’s foreing debt would be sweet. This year, a 68% decrease. Make it better the next year, or you’ll be pinksplipped.
June 14th, 2006 at 9:41 amHey, our representatives in Congress are working almost 100 days this year! They deserve at least 3 times the salary they’re getting.
June 14th, 2006 at 9:42 amI can live 3 monts with the increase to the members of House and Senate!
Comment by Evil Spaniard — June 14, 2006 @ 9:41 am
Good way to look at it…
When’s the last time you got a $3000 salary increase seven times in a row (and I don’t think all of them have just been yearly COL raises… as there was a raise in December 2005 of a similar amount) – when you were doing a GOOD job? These clowns aren’t even doing their jobs well…
June 14th, 2006 at 9:45 am#7 Hey, our representatives in Congress are working almost 100 days this year! Wilco — June 14, 2006 @ 9:42 am
Actually, they’re working 71 days this year. Half as many as when Democrat-controlled.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=1955256&page=1&CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312
June 14th, 2006 at 9:48 amAmnesty International urged European states to stop being “partners in crimeâ€
Yeah asking the perpetrators of a crime to kindly police themselves. Once a person or a government commits crimes and gets away with it…it is too tempting for most to just stop their actions because someone asks them to. Usually it takes somehting drastic.
June 14th, 2006 at 9:56 am“An increase linked to productivity or country’s foreing debt would be sweet”
Isn’t that what Perot had offered to pay himself, but based off of economic growth?
June 14th, 2006 at 9:56 amIsn’t that what Perot had offered to pay himself, but based off of economic growth?
Comment by squegeeboo — June 14, 2006 @ 9:56 am
I think so. Partly why he got 20% of the vote. Imagine what would have happened if he’d actually been qualified for the job…
June 14th, 2006 at 10:00 amNot the best of days today, since the Democrats in DC keep allowing Bush to stage photo ops in places like Iraq, instead of exposing him as a fraud and a creepy liar in chief!
Comment by Jay Randal #3
Au contraire Jay,
That photo op in Baghdad showed the WORLD…
…what a phony political opportunist thiat bag of shit Bushiva REALLY is…
…It was BETTER than that landing on the ac carrier/Mission Accomplished banner…
…People around the world despise Bushiva and Bushites…
…and the more the Repulsivescum TRAITORS keep him on the talking points trail…
…like Social Security…
…the more the WORLD hates him and his inbred supporters and corrupt corporate co-conspirators…
…so take heart Jay…
…this FOOL and HIS TREASONOUS supporters are going to bring the wrath of God and the WORLD down on them…
June 14th, 2006 at 10:01 am#9 – I remember from my history class that the “do nothing” congress was run by Republicans bac then as well. It was 1948, and Pres. Truman was rather miffed that the congress didn’t seem to have any interest in actually working.
That’s what you get when Republicans are in power.
June 14th, 2006 at 10:01 amSilver lining: The less they work, the less opportunity there is for them to screw us.
June 14th, 2006 at 10:09 amSilver lining: The less they work, the less opportunity there is for them to screw us.
Comment by Wilco — June 14, 2006 @ 10:09 am
You’re an optimist :) I’m afraid that I see it that when they aren’t working, it means that they aren’t reading the bills that they are passing into law… Hence the pork and Patriot Act… I want them working like they care.
June 14th, 2006 at 10:13 amCan anyone (even TP) explain how this:
“Despite record low approval ratings, House lawmakers Tuesday embraced a $3,300 pay raise that would increase their salaries to $168,500.â€
Does not violate this amendment to the Constitution?
AMENDMENT XXVII
Originally proposed Sept. 25, 1789. Ratified May 7, 1992.
No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of representatives shall have intervened.
I’d really like to know how all these “annual” raises don’t violate the 27th Amendment,
June 14th, 2006 at 10:17 amBy all means, Mr. Representative – we will pay you additional money from our own shallow pockets for your 92 days of service this year – you deserve it. We bow before you, as you take our causes and concerns to heart and work diligently for all Americans. Never mind that our earned dollar purchases less; never mind that the few dollars we have put away for our old age has lost value; never mind that our health care costs us more for less health care; never mind the ill effects that environmental pollution is having on our children; never mind that our president is out of touch with our lives; never mind that our soldiers are dying daily in a lost war; never mind that our wounded veterans are being denied desperately needed care and services — Mr. Representative, you never mind all of these matters – you keep your mind focused on your own security and welfare because a well paid representative is a good thing.
June 14th, 2006 at 10:21 amLet’s tie congressional pay to the national debt or surplus. The waste and pork would evaporate.
June 14th, 2006 at 10:21 amSilver lining: The less they work, the less opportunity there is for them to screw us.
Comment by Wilco
They just have to screw us more recklessly.
June 14th, 2006 at 10:24 amKarl Rove has proven that it pays to be rotten and powerful. With Bush&Co on your side, you are omnipotent. Rove is the antithesis of the old adage “no good deed goes unpunished” – he is the embodiment that all things bad go scot-free.
June 14th, 2006 at 10:27 am#17 – Welcome back, Wayne! Been busy or on vacation? I’ve got no answer for your question, but will see what I can come up with.
Also among the missing: Where is Sharon Cox? Jules, still on road trip? I’m sure I’m missing someone else.
June 14th, 2006 at 10:29 am#13 BP
June 14th, 2006 at 10:30 amYou always tell it like it is. Americans still don’t see it but the world can recognize bullshit. We will all pay the price for this lying, foolish sack of shit we call president.
Also among the missing: Where is Sharon Cox? Jules, still on road trip? I’m sure I’m missing someone else.
Comment by Zookeeper — June 14, 2006 @ 10:29 am
The raises are automatic unless they vote to amend (to decline) them… that’s what the 27th Amendment is saying. That unless they reject the raises, they happen automatically.
I was wondering about Sharon also… I hope she’s just caught up in her tree hugging…
Jules said two weeks – and left on June 2nd… I’m guessing she’ll be back next week then…
June 14th, 2006 at 10:44 am#22 Thanks, Zookeeper,
I was out on vacation for about a week. Got some work done around the house. Now I’m back in the office taking stock of what fell apart while I was out. The longer I’m out, the more that goes wrong. I think this will be the last time I take more than a day or two off at a time.
But it’s good to be back here. It figures some of the biggest stories happened the first day I was out. Oh, well. Gotta get back to what I should be doing.
If you’re able to find out how they weaseled this raise through, let me know. Either they are ignoring the Constitution, or they are hinging this raise’s Constitutionality on the fact that the law didn’t “take effect” until after the first election of representatives since it was signed into law. And they probably passed it late in the night when nobody was watching or even knew it was being voted on. Damn weasels.
June 14th, 2006 at 10:51 amFEMA doled out $1.4 billion in bogus assistance to “victims†of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita
Shocker. Elect a failed CEO as president and expect the government to fail.
June 14th, 2006 at 11:01 amUnbelievable,
June 14th, 2006 at 11:05 amCongressmen don’t read the bills. They have staff to do that for them. And that’s strenuous work, folks. Since they don’t actually read the legislation, they have to spend their time going to fundraisers and getting massages while drinking mai tais at the gym with Negroponte. This is tough work, folks. They also have to spend hours each day shredding letters and faxes their constituents send them since they clearly don’t have time to read any of them. And if we expect change, if we expect our representatives to work a full day, then haven’t the terrorists won?
I think Bush and the Fox news crowd proved Iraq is a very dangerous place, contrary to their claims that it is safe. Fox played up the president flying in during a dangerous time and highlighted Bush bravery for being there. They played down the fact that it was unannounced secretive and even the Iraqi’s Bush met with literally did not know they were meeting with him till they were in the room with him. Hmmm sounds like the regular media has it right and that Iraq is a very dangerous place. Fox said so, and Bush’s actions and plans prove it. It is simply a publicity stunt to raise flagging support, no different than the Gay Marriage thing or Flag burning.
June 14th, 2006 at 12:07 pm#25 – Wayne, I found this on Wikipedia:
27th Amendment: …This amendment to the United States Constitution provides that any change in the salary of members of Congress may only take effect after the next general election. Sometimes called the “Congressional Compensation Amendment of 1789″, the “Congressional Pay Amendment”, and as the “Madison Amendment”, it was intended to serve as a restraint on the power of Congress to set its own salary—an obvious conflict of interest. Since its 1992 adoption, however, this amendment has not hindered members of Congress from receiving nearly annual pay raises, characterized as “cost-of-living adjustments” (COLAs) rather than as pay raises in the traditional sense of the term. The Federal courts have ruled in cases brought under the amendment that a COLA is not the same thing as a pay raise. Hence, members of Congress have been able to enjoy increases in compensation without triggering the restrictions which this amendment seeks to impose. (Emphasis added)
They’re playing semantics with the 27th Amendment, and we just let them do it. Also, Federal Judges pay is linked to the pay of Congress, so for the Fed Courts to rule that COLAs are not the same as a pay raise, is a bit of a conflict of interest, too, as they benefit financially from that ruling.
June 14th, 2006 at 12:20 pm#29
Correct me if I am wrong, but doesn’t the President’s pay also go up with any increase in Congress’ pay?
June 14th, 2006 at 12:37 pmI think the American Public should have a say on pay raises for elected officials. maybe they can send out a performance review to thier constituants. If people are happy they get a raise, if they are not happy they don’t.
June 14th, 2006 at 12:38 pm#30 – Also from Wikipedia: Traditionally, the President is the highest-paid government employee. Consequently, the President’s salary serves as a traditional cap for all other federal officials, such as the Chief Justice. A raise for 2001 was approved by Congress and President Bill Clinton in 1999 because other officials who receive annual cost-of-living increases had salaries approaching the President’s. Consequently, to raise the salaries of the other federal employees, the President’s salary had to be raised as well.
It looked like the presidential salary was raised to $400,000 in 2001.
June 14th, 2006 at 12:53 pmThe President gets a set salary. It went from $200,000 a few years ago to $400,000. I think during Clinton’s last term…
June 14th, 2006 at 12:56 pmBTW, who calculates the COLA increase? Maybe the ones being payed increase according to COLA? Until today no boss has let me decide my own pay raise.
June 14th, 2006 at 12:56 pmOOOOpps… Zoo you beat me… :)
June 14th, 2006 at 12:58 pmI’m in Barcelona today… (figuratively of course). I so love your city.
Seems that you call Modernisme, we call Art Nouveau. That’s prpobaly why it was different in the English Wikipedia when you looked. I had totally forgotten that…
Makes me want to do another Europe trip. I’ve thought about actually doing them for the community here during summer break. Maybe having teh kids do some fund raising during the year so they can go, and getting some of these kids to explore the world in the name of architecture… Just a thought.
June 14th, 2006 at 1:05 pm#34 – It’s a formula tied to the consumer price index, apparently. I’m guessing the government is in charge of the calculation.
June 14th, 2006 at 1:19 pm#36 – Braggart! ;)
I’m in boring corporate document land right now, and later today I’ll be in updating the billing rate land. *yawn*
June 14th, 2006 at 1:22 pmYou’ve choosen a really sunny day, Unbelievable. You would be happy walking in downtown Barcelona. The Paseo de Gracia avenue was today really busy, with foreing tourists :)
Anyhow, the metheorologists are predicting a new record breaking of temperatures this year, a year as hot as the 2003.
Just don’t do the trip in August, if you don’t want to be roasted, and bring your sun protective cream :)
June 14th, 2006 at 1:27 pmI’m in boring corporate document land right now, and later today I’ll be in updating the billing rate land. *yawn*
Comment by Zookeeper — June 14, 2006 @ 1:22 pm
I don’t start getting paid until July 27th… Feel better? :)
June 14th, 2006 at 2:24 pmZookeeper, unbelievable,
The Constitution also says that the president shall receive compensation which shall neither be increased nor decreased during his term in office.
The 27th Amendment specifically refers to laws “varying the compensation”. It seems to me that even a COLA will “vary” your “compensation”, so I don’t know how a judge could have concluded that it didn’t. Maybe the reasoning is valid for things like Social Security, but for things like Congressional compensation, I think they have to look at it differently. They are not the same thing at all.
Thanks for your help.
June 14th, 2006 at 2:27 pmJust don’t do the trip in August, if you don’t want to be roasted, and bring your sun protective cream :)
Comment by Evil Spaniard — June 14, 2006 @ 1:27 pm
If I have a window of Labor Day through mid-July. When do you recommend is the best weather?
In my new district we only get two month for summer break – but we get a full week Fall break on October, a week at Thanksgiving, 2.5 weeks at the end of the year and two weeks for Spring Break. Once I’m in a better position to travel more often, I intend to do so. California just drained me financially.
Glad you have nice weather. Hope you’ll be able to enjoy it!
June 14th, 2006 at 2:30 pmThey are not the same thing at all.
Thanks for your help.
Comment by Wayne A. Schneider
Any time, Wayne. You are right, they are not the same at all. I see the Fed Judges as having a MAJOR conflict of interest since they benefit from the ruling they made on the COLAs.
June 14th, 2006 at 2:34 pmWayne,
Unfortunately, even if they are doing something unconstitutional – I can’t imagine that anything will happen to them. The executive branch has already violated it at will and none of the corrupt bastards in DC have even really flinched.
Higher standard they apply to themselves, I suppose.
I truly wonder how they sleep at night…
June 14th, 2006 at 2:34 pmI truly wonder how they sleep at night…
Comment by unbelievable
Snug as a crab in a crotch, me thinks.
I don’t start getting paid until July 27th… Feel better? :)
Well, since Zoo Jr graduated, my income has taken a nosedive by 500+ per month, so not really. But I get paid tomorrow — so YES! ;)
June 14th, 2006 at 2:37 pm[parody]
Hi,coffee clique girls:
June 14th, 2006 at 2:38 pmThanks for asking about me;I’m still out here hunching trees.These Giant Red Woods take a little extra time ya know.[hunch,hunch,hunch,hunch,..............]
Save some coffee for me and we’ll hurl it together on our computer screens.[hunch,hunch,hunch,hunch..................]
Blessings![hunch,hunch,hunch,hunch,................]
Yay, Sharon! I was getting worried, but it sounds like you’re having more fun than us — arm stretching and all…
June 14th, 2006 at 2:44 pmYea Zoo
And if I saw off one of the lower branches it really feels good.
June 14th, 2006 at 3:22 pmZoo:
You forget so easily.
June 14th, 2006 at 3:30 pm#s 46&48 are me.
you all can thank feingold (your future candidate for president) and mc cain and their reform to make it only possible for the rich with independent money to run… oh and hurting freedom of speech in the process.
June 14th, 2006 at 4:17 pm#49 – Shit, Denny. now I have to start worrying about Sharon again. I’ll be watching now.
June 14th, 2006 at 4:17 pmZoo:
Come to think of it she hasn’t posted for a while.
June 14th, 2006 at 4:44 pmMaybe she’s just lurking more than posting.
[...] Think Progress [...]
June 14th, 2006 at 5:04 pmDenny,
If Sharon is reading, then Sharon is commenting, even if it’s just one on the way out the door. She wouldn’t let all this stuff going on pass without comment. I don’t think she said she was going anywhere. I’m such a worrywart about things like this…
June 14th, 2006 at 5:11 pm#32 & #33
Thanks!
June 14th, 2006 at 5:18 pmYou betcha, WC!
June 14th, 2006 at 5:31 pmWell, since Zoo Jr graduated, my income has taken a nosedive by 500+ per month,
Comment by Zookeeper — June 14, 2006 @ 2:37 pm
Time to get that boy a job! The Republican Way… put him to work at minimum wage! (sarcasm off)
I get my last check tomorrow until the first pay period in August… New school district does twice a month instead of once a month. So, I feel your pain… Wish I could make the cats get a job… :). I’m getting a bit restless (only been two weeks), but the virtual field trips are helping. There’s really nothing to do locally, unless I make the effort to get into Atlanta (I used to laugh when they talked about traffic in Boise)…
June 14th, 2006 at 6:21 pm# 54 Zoo:
Hhhmmm??
Now my parody is not so funny,I mean,you know–naw,it just can’t be.
June 14th, 2006 at 6:23 pmAny ideas how I can get that thing deleted?
Any ideas how I can get that thing deleted?
Comment by Denny
I know you didn’t mean anything by it, Denny, consider it deleted. By the way, I was lying about Mighty Hag being hot for you…
June 14th, 2006 at 6:50 pmTime to get that boy a job! The Republican Way… put him to work at minimum wage!
I gave him a week off, and then he has to get something — anything. It will help that Zoo Jr the Elder went back to Oregon with his father after graduation, so I’m not feeding both of them.
I used to laugh when they talked about traffic in Boise
I’ve only been to Boise once, but the traffic was nuts! My parents joke about having had to wait for 5 cars to pass while they are leaving the post office. Moscow has more traffic than that, but nothing on the level of Boise or Atlanta — especially when the students are gone.
BTW: Do you remember if Sharon Cox said anything about being gone for a while?
June 14th, 2006 at 6:56 pmZoo:
I’m brewing one for you.
June 14th, 2006 at 7:03 pmIt’ll be a nice one though.
BTW: Do you remember if Sharon Cox said anything about being gone for a while?
Comment by Zookeeper — June 14, 2006 @ 6:56 pm
No I don’t. If she said anything I didn’t see it. I was going to ask you today if you’d seen her, but you beat me to it :). Maybe she finally took herself up on that offer to smash her computer? :)
June 14th, 2006 at 7:15 pmMaybe she finally took herself up on that offer to smash her computer? :)
Comment by unbelievable
I think she’d miss us all too much. Right…?
June 14th, 2006 at 7:33 pmIt’ll be a nice one though.
Comment by Denny
Um, no, really you don’t have to. Um, Mighty Hag really is hot for you…yeah, that’s the ticket….
June 14th, 2006 at 7:36 pmtrueblue is gone, too, although not as long as Sharon.
June 14th, 2006 at 7:37 pmtrueblue is gone, too, although not as long as Sharon.
Comment by Zookeeper — June 14, 2006 @ 7:37 pm
She was around on Sunday standing up to A.P. with me (the misogyny got deep in there).
I agree. Not like Sharon. I try not to worry, but I’m like you… can’t help it.
June 14th, 2006 at 7:44 pmAlways possible she is one of those having problems posting because the server recognizes her as spam? Like what happened to Terry, seems to be happening still to IRI, and the others?
Alright – time for Daily Show and Colbert re-runs… later.
June 14th, 2006 at 7:48 pm# 66 unbelievable:
Once again, how dare you make assumptions about peoples motivation.
June 14th, 2006 at 7:57 pmThat contempt was directed at you,and for you,only.
Now I see how you get in such hot water.
Denny,
Okay have it your way. Trueblue watched me pummell three trolls at one time – Denny was one of them. Not that he put up a fight. More like his usual throw himself to the ground and whimper like the little victim he thinks he is…
Happy now? Oh, wait, that’s right – you’re never happy. Ever.
I love how you try to hold me to an unrealistic standard that you yourself do not even attempt to meet. The hypocrisy is insane… “how dare you” (mocking tone)… “how dare you” You’re so funny Denny. Like that guy in my freshman biology class who would eat frog guts for a quarter.
June 14th, 2006 at 9:45 pm# 69 not to be believed:
You can accuse me of alot of things,but throwing myself on the ground and wimpering before you is not one of them.I’ll admit,you did a good job attempting to pummel we trolls,but you were soundly whooped.You’re still cleaning up after that one.OUCH.
June 15th, 2006 at 1:55 amAnd that frog guy,is that the same one you dated for two weeks before he dropped you?
Denny,
Your delusion is has reached new lows of dementia. I kicked all three of your inbred lard-asses at one time. You know it. It’s why you resort to whining and pitching temper tantrums like a spoiled brat when you can’t win on facts or merit. You don’t even have any. In fact, you’ve not once said anythng that wasn’t some silly sissified school yard diatribe equal to verbal diarrhea. You are the epitome of the cranky four year old who won’t stop whining until he gets what he wants. Wah, wah, wah… Diaper Denny only ever says wah, wah, wah….
June 15th, 2006 at 8:19 amUNB:
BLAH BLAH—BLAH BLAH:
June 15th, 2006 at 11:20 amSave us the rant;I want to know more about the frog guy you dated for two weeks before he dumped you.
Gay Sex Gay Ass Gay Ass
I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view
March 17th, 2008 at 1:36 amYoung Girls Young Teens Angus Young
I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view
March 18th, 2008 at 6:57 amGay Incest Old Gay Men Gay Male Galleries
I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view
March 23rd, 2008 at 4:25 pmNude Pam Anderson Nude Preteen Nudists
I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view
April 1st, 2008 at 4:30 am