Left in the dark.
By on Jun 23rd, 2006 at 4:37 pm
Left in the dark.
Congressional and administration officials have admitted that “U.S. President George W. Bush and his White House were kept in the dark about the Department of Homeland Security’s grant allocations, even though they included controversial cuts to New York City and Washington, until after the decisions were made.”
View Most Popular
Advertisement
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Afghanistan
Bachmann
Beck
Boehner
Business
Cheney
Civil Rights
Congress
Corporate Ethics
Dobbs
Economy
Education
Election
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Gingrich
Glenn Beck
Global Warming
Health Care
Immigration
International Relations
Justice
LGBT
Lieberman
Limbaugh
Media
Military
O'Reilly
Obama
Palin
Pelosi
Politics
Race
Radical Right
Religion
Sports
Steele
Stimulus
Tea Parties
Tea Party
Terrorism
Veterans
Women's Rights
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
Reports
In-depth studies on select topics
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
ArchivesBlog Roll
Have they ever NOT been in the dark?
June 23rd, 2006 at 4:39 pmGood to know it’s not just every American citizen who’s being kept in the dark. My question is, who really knows what’s going on? I suspect nobody.
June 23rd, 2006 at 4:42 pmBull—-. I’m tired of the good cop bad cop routine the Bush crime family pulls on us regularly. Bush was quoted as being glad that “Brownie” was taking the heat for Katrina. They have quite a twisted little maze of diversion options for who takes what blame for the lastest outrage and when. It is time for the American people to awaken and take these bastards down.
June 23rd, 2006 at 4:44 pmThey knew nothing!
June 23rd, 2006 at 4:51 pmMushrooms.
June 23rd, 2006 at 4:57 pmyeah, Bush, the mushroom president
June 23rd, 2006 at 5:07 pmWhy not, Bush keeps all of us in the dark.
June 23rd, 2006 at 5:07 pmRon Suskind, from the exerpts I have read on the net, says that keeping the president uninformed allows him to claim plausible denial.
Well that can go only so far before it returns to bite you in the ass. He knows nothing of what is going on in his own administration? All he is good for is strutting around the country raising millions for the party and traipsing over to Europe with his wrinkled, robotic, vacant and ill dressed first lady of war, on OUR money?
Yup, plausible denial, while thousands are being killed–They both are smiling like little wind up dolls–and the killing goes on–but, being uninformed, they do not know that eh?
June 23rd, 2006 at 5:48 pmBe careful, there is now expected to be a huge amount of “disinformation” to allow everyone who is part of the “criminal Element” within our Federal Government to Cover Their Sweet Ass! What’s important to realize is that they are all involved and right now it looks like they are trying to limit damages!
June 23rd, 2006 at 6:13 pmMany Iraqis are still “in the dark” too, and its really hot without A/C.
How could one man possibly know everything that is going on in the Federal Gubbermint? That’s why you appoint competent people to handle all the various jobs.
June 23rd, 2006 at 6:55 pm“I know nuttink!”
June 23rd, 2006 at 10:19 pm“I am just a dumkopf!”
Perhaps Bush should remove the cod piece from his little, itty bitty right eyed wonder worm that’s also covering his ears that don’t want to hear and start to look and listen with the eyes and ears he was born with. It don’t take much effort to hear the chatter from the disenfranchised on the east coast… Plausible deniability my ass. He’s completely incompetent.
June 24th, 2006 at 4:08 amBush is always waving to me on TV, it must be me because I don’t see anybody else so I always wave back with a closed fist with one fingare extended.
June 24th, 2006 at 5:48 pmNavy Vet,
Heh. Me, too.
June 24th, 2006 at 9:38 pm