How is Gen. Casey’s Iraq timeline
By on Jun 26th, 2006 at 4:05 pm
How is Gen. Casey’s Iraq timeline
different from the Iraq timeline proposed in the Senate last week? Tony Snow offers a crystal clear explanation.
View Most Popular
Advertisement
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Afghanistan
Bachmann
Beck
Boehner
Business
Cheney
Civil Rights
Congress
Corporate Ethics
Dobbs
Economy
Education
Election
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Gingrich
Glenn Beck
Global Warming
Health Care
Immigration
International Relations
Justice
LGBT
Lieberman
Limbaugh
Media
Military
O'Reilly
Obama
Palin
Pelosi
Politics
Race
Radical Right
Religion
Sports
Steele
Stimulus
Tea Parties
Tea Party
Terrorism
Veterans
Women's Rights
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
Reports
In-depth studies on select topics
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
ArchivesBlog Roll
OK, Tony Snow, General Casey was creating “scenarios” to be considered. Then, how are his “scenarios” similar to the Dems “scenarios” and aren’t both sets of “scenarios” different than “staying the course”?
June 26th, 2006 at 4:12 pmTruthiness
June 26th, 2006 at 4:14 pmWhen Snow was on Faux news he never knew truth , even when it slapped him in the face . As we see, somethings never change.
“Heck of a job you are doing there, parrot. Have another cracker!!” says George W Bush.
June 26th, 2006 at 4:22 pmGeneral Casey wants to cut and run?
June 26th, 2006 at 4:23 pmSo, now the republicans want to cut and run? Doesn’t the fact that George W. Bush is reviewing the plan mean that he is thinking about cutting and running.
Well, at least it is better than stay and pay.
June 26th, 2006 at 4:27 pmThe only difference between the democrat’s plan and Gen Casey’s is that the republicans can take credit for it.
June 26th, 2006 at 4:28 pmPlus Cheney is right…..the worst thing the republicans can do right now is cut and run, because it’s too early.
They are saving that card for Oct. 31, just before the elections, so it can make a lasting impact.
June 26th, 2006 at 4:30 pmThe Bush Regime plan is just to claim they might withdraw some troops by the end of 2007 > voters are just supposed to believe that for November elections, then Bush will say the end of 2008 as he leaves office!
June 26th, 2006 at 4:31 pmthe bait and switch republicans…
June 26th, 2006 at 4:50 pmAs far as Bob Herbert goes, better late than never. If you haven’t read “Playing Politics With Iraq” already, you now know where to go.
June 26th, 2006 at 4:56 pmWithdraw troops by November, put them back in December. Remember Fallujah 2004?
June 26th, 2006 at 5:19 pmThe timetable is the same as Dems only it is because our troops arrested a religious leader and Iraq people and PM want US out. Now we have the spin to cover the fact that the GOP vote was worth nothing and Bush isn’t in charge. Let’s see how the PM of Iraq explains to the Iraq people that he can’t rule unless the US tellings him. Look for the religious leader to take care of who is in charge of Iraq. Afgan have our troops leave because the overseas investors with pull their money out thanks to the spying of Cheney. All the lies and corruption is coming to an end. It was always about the money,oil, greed and corruption not about freedom or safty of our troops.
June 26th, 2006 at 5:21 pmIt is a truism that almost any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so, and will follow it by suppressing opposition, subverting all education to seize early the minds of the young, and by killing, locking up, or driving underground all heretics. – Heinlein
Not on topic… but very relevant overall
June 26th, 2006 at 5:40 pmLooks like it’s time for Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice and Snow to cut and run.
June 26th, 2006 at 6:42 pmwhine whine whine!
June 27th, 2006 at 8:29 am