<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VIDEO: Sen. Levin and Fox Anchor in On-Air Scuffle Over Iraq Plan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:14:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Smith</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/comment-page-5/#comment-691523</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/#comment-691523</guid>
		<description>Just browsed this blog, and after reading some of the comments, turned to the &quot;terms of use&quot;. Has anyone ever read it? &quot;You agree not to:
â€¢ Post any messages or provide links to any messages that endorse or oppose a particular political party or candidate for office.&quot;  WHAT A JOKE!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just browsed this blog, and after reading some of the comments, turned to the &#8220;terms of use&#8221;. Has anyone ever read it? &#8220;You agree not to:<br />
â€¢ Post any messages or provide links to any messages that endorse or oppose a particular political party or candidate for office.&#8221;  WHAT A JOKE!!!!!!!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=691523', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr wellington</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/comment-page-5/#comment-651749</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr wellington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 21:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/#comment-651749</guid>
		<description>Its very funny to watch you bloated butt heads implode over Fox News. Stop watching it you stupid idiots. Im sure there are many shows Levine could go on and be lobed a bunch of candass questions with no rebutel kind of like the free ride Al Gore has gotten on his stupid ass global warming tour. If that lying dumb ass Dan Rather were still on the news you could watch his B.S. oh I forgot he resigned in disgrace</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its very funny to watch you bloated butt heads implode over Fox News. Stop watching it you stupid idiots. Im sure there are many shows Levine could go on and be lobed a bunch of candass questions with no rebutel kind of like the free ride Al Gore has gotten on his stupid ass global warming tour. If that lying dumb ass Dan Rather were still on the news you could watch his B.S. oh I forgot he resigned in disgrace<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=651749', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moonbat patrol</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/comment-page-5/#comment-647984</link>
		<dc:creator>moonbat patrol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 13:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/#comment-647984</guid>
		<description># 217 you must be all i see when i look at him or any liberal is the urge to puke. He looks more like Golda Miere (sp?)  or helen thomas in reverse drag.
 I also see someone who has been living on  the public dole for 30 years who is very upset  America voted his party out of power.
 Ben Franklin ... if that was so we would still be British subjects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># 217 you must be all i see when i look at him or any liberal is the urge to puke. He looks more like Golda Miere (sp?)  or helen thomas in reverse drag.<br />
 I also see someone who has been living on  the public dole for 30 years who is very upset  America voted his party out of power.<br />
 Ben Franklin &#8230; if that was so we would still be British subjects.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=647984', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marie</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/comment-page-5/#comment-647838</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 04:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/#comment-647838</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one who thinks of a modern-day Ben Franklin every time I see Levin?  (And kudos to Levin for getting in the last word to the Shrill O&#039;Really wannabe Kilmeade).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one who thinks of a modern-day Ben Franklin every time I see Levin?  (And kudos to Levin for getting in the last word to the Shrill O&#8217;Really wannabe Kilmeade).<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=647838', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John G. Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/comment-page-4/#comment-647749</link>
		<dc:creator>John G. Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 01:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/#comment-647749</guid>
		<description>Why are the Democrats not boycotting the Right Wing Talking Points network?  Donâ€™t they know that by just being on the programs this network produces they give tacit credibility to the network?

If they would boycott this network in mass, it would make a statement.  I donâ€™t watch the right wing programs or the idiot talking heads anyway, so I would not be missing anything if the Dems just did not show up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are the Democrats not boycotting the Right Wing Talking Points network?  Donâ€™t they know that by just being on the programs this network produces they give tacit credibility to the network?</p>
<p>If they would boycott this network in mass, it would make a statement.  I donâ€™t watch the right wing programs or the idiot talking heads anyway, so I would not be missing anything if the Dems just did not show up.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=647749', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lurker</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/comment-page-4/#comment-647665</link>
		<dc:creator>Lurker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 00:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/#comment-647665</guid>
		<description>I sincerely pity them - and that is a far cry from condemnation. 
Comment by mighty aphrodite â€” June 28, 2006 @ 8:02 pm 

Pitying from your perch does little. Try praying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sincerely pity them &#8211; and that is a far cry from condemnation.<br />
Comment by mighty aphrodite â€” June 28, 2006 @ 8:02 pm </p>
<p>Pitying from your perch does little. Try praying.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=647665', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mighty aphrodite</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/comment-page-4/#comment-647662</link>
		<dc:creator>mighty aphrodite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 00:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/#comment-647662</guid>
		<description>#208 -â€œThe AIDS community BLAMED a President of the US for the disease caused by THEIR aberrant behaviour.â€

&#039;Right. Iâ€™m sure every person with AIDS thought they got it because of Reagan. Talk about a â€œstraw man.â€ Please donâ€™t play dumb. Nobody blamed Reagan for the disease. They blamed him for the inexcusable delays in dealing with the disease&#039;
Comment by BlueDAWG. 
******* Your straw dog accusation is laughable.  I never heard ONE spokesperson for the gay community speak about behaviour before 1987.  But you did hear them shriek about Reagan.  After the dust had settled and researchers studied the self-mutating virus, tons of money were provided by government and private sources intent on finding a cure and alleviating the suffering of those stricken.  Your expectation of an instantaneous response neglects to consider the realities of medical research or narrowing the method of disease transmission - BUT it does point to your EXTREMELY impatient manner SO common these days.... 

You adroitly blur the argument between abortion, illegitimacy and poverty, which was not your previous stance.  Nothing has changed from your original refutation and now.  Poverty did NOT contribute to black or white illegitimacy in 1960 when poor people had far fewer resources.  (That is not to say that there were not a number of &quot;6 month babies&quot;, but their parents GOT married.) YOU can repeat your misinformation till you are BLUE in the face and that won&#039;t change the facts.  The ONLY researchers who back up your claim are the biased group at the Alan Guttmacher Institute.  

Not surprisingly, YOU are WRONG when you say I &quot;condemn&quot; women who have had abortions.  I sincerely pity them - and that is a far cry from condemnation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#208 -â€œThe AIDS community BLAMED a President of the US for the disease caused by THEIR aberrant behaviour.â€</p>
<p>&#8216;Right. Iâ€™m sure every person with AIDS thought they got it because of Reagan. Talk about a â€œstraw man.â€ Please donâ€™t play dumb. Nobody blamed Reagan for the disease. They blamed him for the inexcusable delays in dealing with the disease&#8217;<br />
Comment by BlueDAWG.<br />
******* Your straw dog accusation is laughable.  I never heard ONE spokesperson for the gay community speak about behaviour before 1987.  But you did hear them shriek about Reagan.  After the dust had settled and researchers studied the self-mutating virus, tons of money were provided by government and private sources intent on finding a cure and alleviating the suffering of those stricken.  Your expectation of an instantaneous response neglects to consider the realities of medical research or narrowing the method of disease transmission &#8211; BUT it does point to your EXTREMELY impatient manner SO common these days&#8230;. </p>
<p>You adroitly blur the argument between abortion, illegitimacy and poverty, which was not your previous stance.  Nothing has changed from your original refutation and now.  Poverty did NOT contribute to black or white illegitimacy in 1960 when poor people had far fewer resources.  (That is not to say that there were not a number of &#8220;6 month babies&#8221;, but their parents GOT married.) YOU can repeat your misinformation till you are BLUE in the face and that won&#8217;t change the facts.  The ONLY researchers who back up your claim are the biased group at the Alan Guttmacher Institute.  </p>
<p>Not surprisingly, YOU are WRONG when you say I &#8220;condemn&#8221; women who have had abortions.  I sincerely pity them &#8211; and that is a far cry from condemnation.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=647662', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lurker</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/comment-page-4/#comment-647658</link>
		<dc:creator>Lurker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/#comment-647658</guid>
		<description>Interesting - minus the condescending tone I actually COULD be MA. Yet I am a moderate registered as a democrat and who NOW wouldn&#039;t vote GOP for anything after what I have witnessed the past 3 years. The country is being raped by this administration. Children left behind. No real &quot;protection&quot; from the &quot;bad guys&quot; but lots of debt for my children to inherit. 

I do not at all disagree with a good number of her points although her data is not cited and yes, poverty, the parental substance abuse and lack of education are also factors linked with the advent of criminal behavior. 

It sounds like she wants to legislate &quot;correct decisions&quot; - which is an admirable attempt to solve all that is bad and wrong. It just sounds very nanny state to me. I&#039;, not a big fan of the nanny state whenit over-reaches, although paying attention when a category 4 hurricane is headed to a non-swing-state would be helpful for all involved.

I am stuck on MA&#039;s verbage regarding abortion:  if it is rape/incest then the word killing is not used, anything else- you are killing!!  I am all for adoption as a solution to unwanted pregnancies - but if you are against abortion because it is murder thenuse the same term when describing abortions. If it is killing in X case it is killing in Y case- but you will just support that kind of Y killing. 
Actually, we all do it...that is why moral relativism is is a bunch of bunk that is thrown around to make the thrower look so superior.

MA, your beliefs are admirable, not even THAT far from my own, but they certainly are not what the GOP stands for. If you feel comfortable there then that&#039;s great. But I have to answer to God one day and after the past 3 years....it&#039;s a vote for pure evil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting &#8211; minus the condescending tone I actually COULD be MA. Yet I am a moderate registered as a democrat and who NOW wouldn&#8217;t vote GOP for anything after what I have witnessed the past 3 years. The country is being raped by this administration. Children left behind. No real &#8220;protection&#8221; from the &#8220;bad guys&#8221; but lots of debt for my children to inherit. </p>
<p>I do not at all disagree with a good number of her points although her data is not cited and yes, poverty, the parental substance abuse and lack of education are also factors linked with the advent of criminal behavior. </p>
<p>It sounds like she wants to legislate &#8220;correct decisions&#8221; &#8211; which is an admirable attempt to solve all that is bad and wrong. It just sounds very nanny state to me. I&#8217;, not a big fan of the nanny state whenit over-reaches, although paying attention when a category 4 hurricane is headed to a non-swing-state would be helpful for all involved.</p>
<p>I am stuck on MA&#8217;s verbage regarding abortion:  if it is rape/incest then the word killing is not used, anything else- you are killing!!  I am all for adoption as a solution to unwanted pregnancies &#8211; but if you are against abortion because it is murder thenuse the same term when describing abortions. If it is killing in X case it is killing in Y case- but you will just support that kind of Y killing.<br />
Actually, we all do it&#8230;that is why moral relativism is is a bunch of bunk that is thrown around to make the thrower look so superior.</p>
<p>MA, your beliefs are admirable, not even THAT far from my own, but they certainly are not what the GOP stands for. If you feel comfortable there then that&#8217;s great. But I have to answer to God one day and after the past 3 years&#8230;.it&#8217;s a vote for pure evil.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=647658', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mighty aphrodite</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/comment-page-4/#comment-647640</link>
		<dc:creator>mighty aphrodite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/#comment-647640</guid>
		<description>#204 - &quot;....leftist morality on abortion. It it is not something anybody ever does lightly, however, in a society where there are limited resources, where not all children get adopted, and where there is a definite stigma attached to being a single mother...&quot;
******I believe many abortions are very traumatic for the mothers.  But there are some women for whom such a procedure is a huge relief and is a matter of convenience. Here are a few of the reasons I have personally heard over the years from women who obtained legal abortions: Failed birth control, parents who would be disappointed, &quot;damaged&quot; baby, an affair gone bad, a promotion at work, selective abortion of a triplet or quadruplet, an affair with a married man....and my personal all-time favourite - a vacation which &quot;could not be interrupted&quot;. 

Your assertion regarding the &quot;definite stigma attached to being a single mother&quot; is.....where??  Not among our secular humanists and atheists, our suburban neighbours, Hollywood, sophisticated Europeans, or residents of America&#039;s inner cities. Where is the stigma?    

&quot;Very comendable, if you actually do it. Personally I donâ€™t think you actually do, your lack of empathy more then gives me doubts about the veracity of your claim,&quot;  - Comment by Bruce Gorton
******You are free to think as you wish.  But really, your opinion of me is none of my business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#204 &#8211; &#8220;&#8230;.leftist morality on abortion. It it is not something anybody ever does lightly, however, in a society where there are limited resources, where not all children get adopted, and where there is a definite stigma attached to being a single mother&#8230;&#8221;<br />
******I believe many abortions are very traumatic for the mothers.  But there are some women for whom such a procedure is a huge relief and is a matter of convenience. Here are a few of the reasons I have personally heard over the years from women who obtained legal abortions: Failed birth control, parents who would be disappointed, &#8220;damaged&#8221; baby, an affair gone bad, a promotion at work, selective abortion of a triplet or quadruplet, an affair with a married man&#8230;.and my personal all-time favourite &#8211; a vacation which &#8220;could not be interrupted&#8221;. </p>
<p>Your assertion regarding the &#8220;definite stigma attached to being a single mother&#8221; is&#8230;..where??  Not among our secular humanists and atheists, our suburban neighbours, Hollywood, sophisticated Europeans, or residents of America&#8217;s inner cities. Where is the stigma?    </p>
<p>&#8220;Very comendable, if you actually do it. Personally I donâ€™t think you actually do, your lack of empathy more then gives me doubts about the veracity of your claim,&#8221;  &#8211; Comment by Bruce Gorton<br />
******You are free to think as you wish.  But really, your opinion of me is none of my business.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=647640', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moonbat patrol</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/comment-page-4/#comment-647638</link>
		<dc:creator>moonbat patrol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/#comment-647638</guid>
		<description>#199- good
 #207- spoken like a true moonbat! i may be a troll but I am right! and you took the time above all other posts here to respond soley to my post so maybe it&#039;s time you turned off your computer and go play in traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#199- good<br />
 #207- spoken like a true moonbat! i may be a troll but I am right! and you took the time above all other posts here to respond soley to my post so maybe it&#8217;s time you turned off your computer and go play in traffic.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=647638', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Keeler</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/comment-page-4/#comment-647593</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Keeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/#comment-647593</guid>
		<description>Levin is just like all Democrats - everyone elses opinions are not as good as theirs, and if they are different they dont want to hear them.  

Reading all your comments, it is pretty clear why you guys are out of power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Levin is just like all Democrats &#8211; everyone elses opinions are not as good as theirs, and if they are different they dont want to hear them.  </p>
<p>Reading all your comments, it is pretty clear why you guys are out of power.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=647593', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CED</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/comment-page-4/#comment-647441</link>
		<dc:creator>CED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 21:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/#comment-647441</guid>
		<description>No. 38 is nothing but a troll. 

Ignore him people. He&#039;s just a little wap who likes to to rant and he has a forum to do it.  I&#039;ll bet if nobody responds to him again, he&#039;ll turn his PC off and go outside and play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. 38 is nothing but a troll. </p>
<p>Ignore him people. He&#8217;s just a little wap who likes to to rant and he has a forum to do it.  I&#8217;ll bet if nobody responds to him again, he&#8217;ll turn his PC off and go outside and play.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=647441', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ellieinla</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/comment-page-4/#comment-647320</link>
		<dc:creator>ellieinla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 20:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/#comment-647320</guid>
		<description>Regardless of the rest of Fox News, I think BK&#039;s commenting on Levin&#039;s last answer and spinning it with his opinion is irresponsible journalism.  Even if his comment had been favorable towards the Dems, it still would be irresponsible.  If he&#039;s going to make a comment like that, it should only be to play devil&#039;s advocate (thus prefaced with an introduction like, &#039;But so and so says...&#039;), and should not have been said at the end of the interview when Levin could not respond.  It&#039;s the mark of a bad journalist, conservative or liberal.

In addition, #38, do you call Senators Arlen Specter or Norm Coleman, both of whom are good Jews, &#039;old jew republicans&#039;?  Shame on you for highlighting your anti-semitic views while trying to discredit those of the other party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regardless of the rest of Fox News, I think BK&#8217;s commenting on Levin&#8217;s last answer and spinning it with his opinion is irresponsible journalism.  Even if his comment had been favorable towards the Dems, it still would be irresponsible.  If he&#8217;s going to make a comment like that, it should only be to play devil&#8217;s advocate (thus prefaced with an introduction like, &#8216;But so and so says&#8230;&#8217;), and should not have been said at the end of the interview when Levin could not respond.  It&#8217;s the mark of a bad journalist, conservative or liberal.</p>
<p>In addition, #38, do you call Senators Arlen Specter or Norm Coleman, both of whom are good Jews, &#8216;old jew republicans&#8217;?  Shame on you for highlighting your anti-semitic views while trying to discredit those of the other party.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=647320', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ellieinla</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/comment-page-4/#comment-647313</link>
		<dc:creator>ellieinla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 20:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/#comment-647313</guid>
		<description>Regardless of the rest of Fox News, I think BK&#039;s commenting on Levin&#039;s last answer and spinning it with his opinion is irresponsible journalism.  Even if his comment had been favorable towards the Dems, it still would be irresponsible.  If he&#039;s going to make a comment like that, it should only be to play devil&#039;s advocate (thus prefaced with an introduction like, &#039;But so and so says...&#039;), and should not have been said at the end of the interview when Levin could not respond.  It&#039;s the mark of a bad journalist, conservative or liberal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regardless of the rest of Fox News, I think BK&#8217;s commenting on Levin&#8217;s last answer and spinning it with his opinion is irresponsible journalism.  Even if his comment had been favorable towards the Dems, it still would be irresponsible.  If he&#8217;s going to make a comment like that, it should only be to play devil&#8217;s advocate (thus prefaced with an introduction like, &#8216;But so and so says&#8230;&#8217;), and should not have been said at the end of the interview when Levin could not respond.  It&#8217;s the mark of a bad journalist, conservative or liberal.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=647313', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Gorton</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/comment-page-4/#comment-647060</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Gorton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 19:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/#comment-647060</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;As an idealistic young person, I became DISGUSTED the way my former party and the Left pilloried an old man, Ronald Reagan, about AIDS. &lt;strong&gt;NEVER criticizing the slutty behaviour, etc. that launched AIDS off the platform, protesting the proposed closure of San Franciscan â€œbath-housesâ€ was the heigth of irresponsibility and buck-passing. Some gay activists actually breathed a sigh of RELIEF (how twisted is that?) when heteros and transfusion patients started to be affected. THOSE patients would take the onus off THEM.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Some gay activists, figured that with the advent of AIDS spreading to straight people, something would get done about it. It was not a matter of taking the onus off of anybody. I know gay people, and where I live they are a shit sight more careful about AIDS then most straight people I know. That is why the bulk of people in South Africa with AIDS are straight.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Defending a motherâ€™s right to abort and NEVER mentioning the valuable, unselfish concept of adoption.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Here is the leftist morality on abortion: Abortion is a last resort. It it is not something anybody ever does lightly, however, in a society where there are limited resources, where not all children get adopted, and where there is a definite stigma attached to being a single mother (that would be you and all of your preaching about slutty behaviour) it is better to have the abortions legal and safe then to have them done in back alleys with wire coat hangers. Abortion will always exist, the question is, how can we can limit the harm it does.

&lt;blockquote&gt; I donate money and my professional services to several homes for unwed mothers. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Very comendable, if you actually do it. Personally I don&#039;t think you actually do, your lack of empathy more then gives me doubts about the veracity of your claim, after all aren&#039;t they all just sluts who should have chosen better men?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>As an idealistic young person, I became DISGUSTED the way my former party and the Left pilloried an old man, Ronald Reagan, about AIDS. <strong>NEVER criticizing the slutty behaviour, etc. that launched AIDS off the platform, protesting the proposed closure of San Franciscan â€œbath-housesâ€ was the heigth of irresponsibility and buck-passing. Some gay activists actually breathed a sigh of RELIEF (how twisted is that?) when heteros and transfusion patients started to be affected. THOSE patients would take the onus off THEM.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Some gay activists, figured that with the advent of AIDS spreading to straight people, something would get done about it. It was not a matter of taking the onus off of anybody. I know gay people, and where I live they are a shit sight more careful about AIDS then most straight people I know. That is why the bulk of people in South Africa with AIDS are straight.</p>
<blockquote><p>Defending a motherâ€™s right to abort and NEVER mentioning the valuable, unselfish concept of adoption.</p></blockquote>
<p>Here is the leftist morality on abortion: Abortion is a last resort. It it is not something anybody ever does lightly, however, in a society where there are limited resources, where not all children get adopted, and where there is a definite stigma attached to being a single mother (that would be you and all of your preaching about slutty behaviour) it is better to have the abortions legal and safe then to have them done in back alleys with wire coat hangers. Abortion will always exist, the question is, how can we can limit the harm it does.</p>
<blockquote><p> I donate money and my professional services to several homes for unwed mothers. </p></blockquote>
<p>Very comendable, if you actually do it. Personally I don&#8217;t think you actually do, your lack of empathy more then gives me doubts about the veracity of your claim, after all aren&#8217;t they all just sluts who should have chosen better men?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=647060', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mighty aphrodite</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/comment-page-4/#comment-646995</link>
		<dc:creator>mighty aphrodite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 18:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/#comment-646995</guid>
		<description>Bluedog - Please read my comment to Bruce - it addresses most of your DNC talking points. But to your other talking tidbits:

#190 -&quot;I see. So now, as a â€œsmall-government conservative,â€ you think the government should force women to carry a pregnancy against their will. Interesting. 
Comment by Bluedog49 
*****A completely specious argument - but maybe you knew that... Government doesn&#039;t allow me to kill others (other than in self-defense).  It doesn&#039;t allow me to neglect my children.  I think women - who have the power sexually - should be MUCH more particular in their choices. Freedoms are not absolute, but you knew that...

#191 - &quot;The rate of out-of-wedlock births follows the poverty rate.&quot; - Blueboy
*****Blue - YOU are COMPLETELY WRONG.  In 1960, when black poverty was significantly higher, the black illegitimacy rate was 7%.  The rate for whites was slightly below 5%.  With the black illegitimacy rate hovering at 70% and whilte illegitimacy rate at 37%, declining moral values should be blamed for out of wedlock births. If $$$ alone was the answer to curing poverty, there should be NO MORE peverty as we have spent more money on entitlement programs than we have on defense since 1965.  It is not simply a lack of $$$ - it is a lack of character and culture.

#193 - &quot;At what age does it become unseemly to criticize a President of the United States for his policies? If a President is too old to be criticized, is he or she qualified to be President?&quot;  -comment by dog
*****Bluedog Gorton - CONGRATS!! YOU have passed the PROG test.  (ie. Never argue the argument - deflect.. and then deflect some more,....)  The AIDS community BLAMED a President of the US for the disease caused by THEIR aberrant behaviour.  That&#039;s more than a little twisted - but it is a perfect example of modern progressivism.  Criticize Star Wars or the Evil Empire remark - but assume responsibility for your own behaviour....if you&#039;re capable...

Gotta run....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bluedog &#8211; Please read my comment to Bruce &#8211; it addresses most of your DNC talking points. But to your other talking tidbits:</p>
<p>#190 -&#8221;I see. So now, as a â€œsmall-government conservative,â€ you think the government should force women to carry a pregnancy against their will. Interesting.<br />
Comment by Bluedog49<br />
*****A completely specious argument &#8211; but maybe you knew that&#8230; Government doesn&#8217;t allow me to kill others (other than in self-defense).  It doesn&#8217;t allow me to neglect my children.  I think women &#8211; who have the power sexually &#8211; should be MUCH more particular in their choices. Freedoms are not absolute, but you knew that&#8230;</p>
<p>#191 &#8211; &#8220;The rate of out-of-wedlock births follows the poverty rate.&#8221; &#8211; Blueboy<br />
*****Blue &#8211; YOU are COMPLETELY WRONG.  In 1960, when black poverty was significantly higher, the black illegitimacy rate was 7%.  The rate for whites was slightly below 5%.  With the black illegitimacy rate hovering at 70% and whilte illegitimacy rate at 37%, declining moral values should be blamed for out of wedlock births. If $$$ alone was the answer to curing poverty, there should be NO MORE peverty as we have spent more money on entitlement programs than we have on defense since 1965.  It is not simply a lack of $$$ &#8211; it is a lack of character and culture.</p>
<p>#193 &#8211; &#8220;At what age does it become unseemly to criticize a President of the United States for his policies? If a President is too old to be criticized, is he or she qualified to be President?&#8221;  -comment by dog<br />
*****Bluedog Gorton &#8211; CONGRATS!! YOU have passed the PROG test.  (ie. Never argue the argument &#8211; deflect.. and then deflect some more,&#8230;.)  The AIDS community BLAMED a President of the US for the disease caused by THEIR aberrant behaviour.  That&#8217;s more than a little twisted &#8211; but it is a perfect example of modern progressivism.  Criticize Star Wars or the Evil Empire remark &#8211; but assume responsibility for your own behaviour&#8230;.if you&#8217;re capable&#8230;</p>
<p>Gotta run&#8230;.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=646995', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mighty aphrodite</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/comment-page-4/#comment-646949</link>
		<dc:creator>mighty aphrodite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 18:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/#comment-646949</guid>
		<description>#184 - &quot;MA references Paul Kurtz? Now thereâ€™s a surprising sign of intelligence from a Bushie. A more relevant book on Religion...&quot; -  comment from nanlich
***** &quot;A more relevant book on Religion....&quot;(???)  I was referencing the non-religion of intellectual elitists. (The fact you and others choose to believe as you do is none of my business. KEEP your &quot;beliefs&quot; out of politics....) 


#187 - &quot;Maybe you can explain how feeling you have a personal relationship with the creator of the universe is NOT self-involved. &quot; - Comment by Bluedog49 
***** I suppose acknowledgement of One infinitly greater than one-self could be termed &quot;self-involved&quot; - but I believe humility is a better term. 


#189 - Dear Bruce - Some people have a difficult time digesting what they have read so I will clarify my earlier points for a few minutes.  From your post:
&quot;Did you ever ask the gays why AIDS becoming a wider issue was a relief to them?&quot;
****** Go back and read the AIDS premise and THEN come back and tell me where ANYTHING I said about the plight of the gay community is wrong.  Where you and I disagree: many urban homosexuals were not willing to take recommended steps to slow the transmission of the disease.  How twisted to be happy that other demographic groups become infected to lessen your own angst.

Back to Bruce - &quot;I have seen the rightwing white guys say the same thing about AIDS in Africa, its a solution.&quot;
******* WHO said such an awful thing?  

More from Bruce - &quot;You accuse the left of moral relativism? Tell me, who has accepted that the US constitution only applies in peace time? Not the leftwing.&quot;
******** This statement is a pitiful stretch and completely irrelevant.  (This premise might have fit more logically in countering my leftist anti-American argument...but you were grasping at straws and this statement proves it.)  Examples of LEFTIST moral relativism:
Defending a mother&#039;s right to abort and NEVER mentioning the valuable, unselfish concept of adoption.  
The medicalization of deviance. (This began with attorneys proposing Dan White&#039;s &quot;Twinkie Defense&quot; during his murder trial in San Francisco.)
Your ignorance about what I do to support unwed mother&#039;s would be stunning if it did not expose your abundant stupidity.  I donate money and my professional services to several homes for unwed mothers. (Perhaps your only contribution to unwed mothers was making them one in the first place.)
About abusive relationships and deadbeat Dads.  I think both are despicable. But lets be honest, most people these days have sex first and talk later.  Rarely does someone suddenly become an abusive boyfriend.  There is often small signs which offer indications of potentially increasing abuse - sadly some women ignore the signs or try to change Mr. Wrong.  THAT was his parents&#039; job - not hers.  WOMEN must choose better MEN!! Most solid citizens who get up, go to work, pay their bills, don&#039;t abuse drugs or alcohol don&#039;t become deadbeat Dads.  I am sure we have watched perfectly nice men and women choose the same type of &quot;thrilling&quot; or &quot;sexy&quot; boyfriends and girlfriends again and again.  I didn&#039;t need to get bit twice by a snake to know it hurt.  When a new snake slithers up, send it packing
I do not argue that abortion is a method to curtail crime as a Dr. Morganthaler of Canada argues. If women had higher moral standards there would be fewer illegitimate births.  Adoption is the best and most viable solution.  In cases of rape or incest, I am a huge proponent of immediate dilation and curettage.
  
I&#039;m not a saint - but I have seen some of the saddest situations occur because of stupid choices.  

I suspect you&#039;ve been a lefty all your life - the tip off was your equating the theoretical and hypothethical with personal morality. (It is, and was, a classic leftist arguing device.) 

&#039;tol much later........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#184 &#8211; &#8220;MA references Paul Kurtz? Now thereâ€™s a surprising sign of intelligence from a Bushie. A more relevant book on Religion&#8230;&#8221; &#8211;  comment from nanlich<br />
***** &#8220;A more relevant book on Religion&#8230;.&#8221;(???)  I was referencing the non-religion of intellectual elitists. (The fact you and others choose to believe as you do is none of my business. KEEP your &#8220;beliefs&#8221; out of politics&#8230;.) </p>
<p>#187 &#8211; &#8220;Maybe you can explain how feeling you have a personal relationship with the creator of the universe is NOT self-involved. &#8221; &#8211; Comment by Bluedog49<br />
***** I suppose acknowledgement of One infinitly greater than one-self could be termed &#8220;self-involved&#8221; &#8211; but I believe humility is a better term. </p>
<p>#189 &#8211; Dear Bruce &#8211; Some people have a difficult time digesting what they have read so I will clarify my earlier points for a few minutes.  From your post:<br />
&#8220;Did you ever ask the gays why AIDS becoming a wider issue was a relief to them?&#8221;<br />
****** Go back and read the AIDS premise and THEN come back and tell me where ANYTHING I said about the plight of the gay community is wrong.  Where you and I disagree: many urban homosexuals were not willing to take recommended steps to slow the transmission of the disease.  How twisted to be happy that other demographic groups become infected to lessen your own angst.</p>
<p>Back to Bruce &#8211; &#8220;I have seen the rightwing white guys say the same thing about AIDS in Africa, its a solution.&#8221;<br />
******* WHO said such an awful thing?  </p>
<p>More from Bruce &#8211; &#8220;You accuse the left of moral relativism? Tell me, who has accepted that the US constitution only applies in peace time? Not the leftwing.&#8221;<br />
******** This statement is a pitiful stretch and completely irrelevant.  (This premise might have fit more logically in countering my leftist anti-American argument&#8230;but you were grasping at straws and this statement proves it.)  Examples of LEFTIST moral relativism:<br />
Defending a mother&#8217;s right to abort and NEVER mentioning the valuable, unselfish concept of adoption.<br />
The medicalization of deviance. (This began with attorneys proposing Dan White&#8217;s &#8220;Twinkie Defense&#8221; during his murder trial in San Francisco.)<br />
Your ignorance about what I do to support unwed mother&#8217;s would be stunning if it did not expose your abundant stupidity.  I donate money and my professional services to several homes for unwed mothers. (Perhaps your only contribution to unwed mothers was making them one in the first place.)<br />
About abusive relationships and deadbeat Dads.  I think both are despicable. But lets be honest, most people these days have sex first and talk later.  Rarely does someone suddenly become an abusive boyfriend.  There is often small signs which offer indications of potentially increasing abuse &#8211; sadly some women ignore the signs or try to change Mr. Wrong.  THAT was his parents&#8217; job &#8211; not hers.  WOMEN must choose better MEN!! Most solid citizens who get up, go to work, pay their bills, don&#8217;t abuse drugs or alcohol don&#8217;t become deadbeat Dads.  I am sure we have watched perfectly nice men and women choose the same type of &#8220;thrilling&#8221; or &#8220;sexy&#8221; boyfriends and girlfriends again and again.  I didn&#8217;t need to get bit twice by a snake to know it hurt.  When a new snake slithers up, send it packing<br />
I do not argue that abortion is a method to curtail crime as a Dr. Morganthaler of Canada argues. If women had higher moral standards there would be fewer illegitimate births.  Adoption is the best and most viable solution.  In cases of rape or incest, I am a huge proponent of immediate dilation and curettage.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a saint &#8211; but I have seen some of the saddest situations occur because of stupid choices.  </p>
<p>I suspect you&#8217;ve been a lefty all your life &#8211; the tip off was your equating the theoretical and hypothethical with personal morality. (It is, and was, a classic leftist arguing device.) </p>
<p>&#8216;tol much later&#8230;&#8230;..<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=646949', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PLC (Patriotic Liberal Christian)</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/comment-page-4/#comment-646922</link>
		<dc:creator>PLC (Patriotic Liberal Christian)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 18:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/#comment-646922</guid>
		<description>185  Moonbat Patrol
   1.  I agree, you don&#039;t &quot;owe&quot; me any response.
   2.  I support your right to speech.
   3.  I also reserve my right to speech.
   4.  You are posting on a public, progressive blog discussion site, giving implicit 
        permission to me and others to question your comments.
   5.   I did not label you for using &quot;jew&quot; in a post.  Others did, you denied any bigotry,
        and then I simply asked why you used the term, then.   A simply admission that
        it had nothing to do with the rest of your content or an explanation would have 
        satisfied me (I know, you don&#039;t exist to satisfy me)
   6.  I&#039;m done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>185  Moonbat Patrol<br />
   1.  I agree, you don&#8217;t &#8220;owe&#8221; me any response.<br />
   2.  I support your right to speech.<br />
   3.  I also reserve my right to speech.<br />
   4.  You are posting on a public, progressive blog discussion site, giving implicit<br />
        permission to me and others to question your comments.<br />
   5.   I did not label you for using &#8220;jew&#8221; in a post.  Others did, you denied any bigotry,<br />
        and then I simply asked why you used the term, then.   A simply admission that<br />
        it had nothing to do with the rest of your content or an explanation would have<br />
        satisfied me (I know, you don&#8217;t exist to satisfy me)<br />
   6.  I&#8217;m done.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=646922', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Gorton</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/comment-page-4/#comment-646829</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Gorton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 18:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/#comment-646829</guid>
		<description>Bluedog49

Excellent point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bluedog49</p>
<p>Excellent point.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=646829', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/comment-page-4/#comment-646821</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 17:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/27/levin-fox/#comment-646821</guid>
		<description>Poor Li&#039;l Brian.  He must get tired of playing Butthead to Steve Dorky&#039;s Beavis.  I saw him completely discombobulate while interviewing Cynthia McKinney a coulpe months back.  What a clown.  It was embarrassing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor Li&#8217;l Brian.  He must get tired of playing Butthead to Steve Dorky&#8217;s Beavis.  I saw him completely discombobulate while interviewing Cynthia McKinney a coulpe months back.  What a clown.  It was embarrassing.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=646821', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
