QUOTE
Scared and unsure how to fight terrorists, they confront “climate change,” which only requires spending trillions of other people’s dollars on something that may not need fixing or may not be fixable. No wonder some of these people chain themselves to trees – they think money grows on them.

Is this what Fox is going to try to put up as the alternative to The Daily Show?

The Nutjobs are stealing lines again: We will fight them on the beaches, we will fight them in the trenches – we will fight them in the Comedy Clubs?

You said ”prove it”; I just did.(or you did).

Still laughing–hahahahahahaha………………………………………………

(the improved version 2.0) = unbelievable.

The problem stems from a lack of adequate electronic capacity (i.e. “brain” damage).

We apologize for the inconvenience this has caused. But are mostly embarrassed by the utter failure of our “troll alert” product.

Update: We suggest you uninstall the original “troll alert” version to prevent from giving your computer a rather nasty case of Syphilis.

Speak for yourself. I already explained that periods at the end of sentances do not connotate yelling, but normal tone. You really should have learned that in first grade.

And you posted in M.A.s name,that can be proven.
Comment by troll alert — July 15, 2006 @ 6:15 pm

Then prove it. Except that you can’t because it wasn’t me. I only post as ‘unbelievable’. You are simply projecting your own behavior on to me because you are obssessed with me. Well, get over it.

I’m out of here until Wednesday…

I am the sophomoric moron from post 61 and 92. I want credit for my thoughts. Don’t give someone else my glory.

No it hasn’t. Because you can’t prove something that isn’t true. And stating you opinion does not make it true. Just proves you are a paranoid freak of nature.

‘Your’ should be ‘you are’ or ‘you’re’;as in, you’re a lying idiot.
Comment by troll alert — July 15, 2006 @ 5:45 pm

Nitpicking grammar? Funny from someone with non-existent grammar skills itself.

Proof that you are a lying idiot is the fact that I am neither.

By the way – a troll is someone like Seixon who is an opponent. A progressive on a progressive site is never the troll.

What are you going to do for the next two weeks that I’m out of town and in pre-planning meetings at school? Accuse the entire site of being me? Go ahead. Everyone already thinks your psychotic.

You’re the one who name shifts. I am only ‘unbelievable’.

M.A.,This hag, unbelievable,is clearly psychotic and just playing with herself.

On the subject of Cheney face shooting, did you hear your president joke about it during the White House Correspondence Dinner?

******Spoken like a true “toleRANT” progressive!! But then again, “progressive politics” is based on old, tired, failed philosophies. Need proof? Do some research on the “boutique socialism” in the worker’s paradise of Sweden? Their sociaized safety net is having a difficult time keep up with the entitled. Social spending had driven the government’s budget deficit to 35% of government spending and 13% of GDP. Swedish welfare provisions stipulated that anyone fired or laid off from a job could get up to 80% of his original salary in public assistance. Consequently, absenteeism in the private sector approached 25% – and why not? Work was punished! (A medical miracle occurred when Swedish pols decided that they would not allow sick pay for the “first day” of an illness – the result – miraculous work attendance on MONDAYS!) Free national health care made Sweden the “sickest” country in Europe – so long as government picked up the tab, Swedes demanded the highest care for the feeblest illnesses. The system buckled under the weight. Because almost everything was provided for, and because of income tax rates approaching 90% in the highest brackets, Swedish households accumulated almost no savings. And the CONFORMITY!!! Talk about intellectually stifling….
(the previous statistics attributed to Radley Balko and Virginia Postrel of Reason Magazine)

But the good news – the neo-libs (led by Carl Bildt), rolled back SOME of the entitlement spending and lowered the max tax on corporate profit. The social hammock inhabitants rejected the neo-libs but not before they WERE able to lessen telecom regulations, which has benefitted the Swedish economy. Now if they could just do something about Swedens’ abnormally high suicide rate….