O-o-h, someone HILLARY-OUS from LA? No questions, No comments. Speaks for itself.

And, because of that, it isn’t far wrong to say that hill, and bill, and joe, and chuck, are NOT liberals, but actually are allies of GFH Bush as long as he is attacking Arabs. No need to uphold real American laws against the Felon-in-Chief. They work for AIPAC; so they believe in an Amendment that doesn’t exist.

Under OUR laws, the US should be doing WHAT REAGAN DID in 81, namely to cut weapons sales to Israel until they go back behind their borders and stop acting like Arabs are Jews in Germany under THAT rightwing government.

A question about racism from a Zionist is HILARIOUS.

Thanks for stopping by. And remember, Bolotoine may be a Zionist, but he may not be. It’s a funny thing how the Bushies always end up screwing their friends, as well as their enemies.

“I think you are just one dumb redneck and NOT Jewish”

LOLOLOL…

Why don’t you come over and check?

… and, g, let me think, sorry, I’m slow today

U

R

Not “one”

Not “dumb”

and

Not a

“redneck”

BTW, could you please explain to me the meaning of the word “redneck” ? I’m sorry again, I’m new to this, pease forgive me my ignorance about the origins and the meaning of the word I’m inquiring about.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:s.03633:

One of their primary arguments is corruption within the U.N. But then check out this article from today’s Washington Post about the most recent report on waste and fraud within the Homeland Security Department.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/26/AR2006072601683.html

From an article written in 2002: “Since 1973, Israel has cost the United States about $1.6 trillion. If divided by today’s population, that is more than $5,700 per person.”

http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/1209/p16s01-wmgn.html

Looks to me like the U.S. would like to be in CHARGE of the fraud and corruption, and would opt for guns over butter any day.

My general impression is two-fold:

1. Most comments made sound like they are made by people who never seen professional politician at work.

Ambassador Bolton will create for you an impression of unique and highly professional politician from his first public appearance you will listen to.

Among Congresswomen / Congressmen / Senators he is the one that always makes sense.

2. Most comments made sound like they are made by people for whom Willy the Clinton was an example of a style for politician:

A little bit of “inhale” ta-ta-ta
A little bit of sax ta-ta-ta
A little bit of Mogadishu ta-ta-ta
A little bit of cigar ta-ta-ta
A little bit of North Korea ta-ta-ta
A little bit of Oval Office ta-ta-ta
A little bit of Monica ta-ta-ta
A little bit of Madeleine to butcher Serbia ta-ta-ta
A little bit of Hillary for Senate ta-ta-ta

“John Bolton must be removed from the UN: PERIOD.”

Dream up…

“John Bolton doesn’t care about black people.”

Where exactly do you go with this suggestion?

That Ambassador Bolton is a racist? Is that it?

Sorry, Amanda. I missed the message your attempt to communicate in the article.

Could You, please, make it a one-liner? if possible of cause.

Your government at work, folks.

You mean, as corrupt as Haliburton, overcharging payments done with taxpayer money, or serving putrid water to USA troops? Or as corrupt as Enron, who caused the debacle of the energetic market, its stock, its stockholders, its employes, etc… Or corrupt as the money machine that was the Tom Delay organization to funnel money to the Republican Party financing and construction of a nepotist republican bureaucracy around the President? Or as corrupt as the Dukester?

The Republican smearing with corruption charges of the UN is very hypocryte, when in their own houses they commit far worser crimes.

And, btw, many companies beneffitting from the Oil For Food scandal were from the USA…

The “Corruption of the UN” is only another slogan to bring it down. If there exists corruption, stablish additional checks and balances, and don’t simply destroy it.

Destroying the UN is only a strategy to grant absolute power to the warmongers. But, even for them, is a dangerous strategy because, what grants that the USA will win forever in a world without the UN? Germany, the biggest military potency then, tried to do it 60 years ago, and failed miserably, and ended divided, empoverished and subdued to the will of the winners.

Gimme a break, a republican wanting to see the U.N. succede in it’s mission. Anyone wanna buy a bridge in NYC?

The fear of ‘international taxation’ has been a mainstay of rightwing exceptionalism since the Rapepublican Senate helped kill Mr. Wilson’s League of Nations, and Mr. Wilson.

They don’t want ANY kind of law binding their stealing and murder.

That’s 85 years that the righwing has been beating that tired horse.

Bolotoine is a radical, not a representative of America. And he is actually acutely hostile to American interests, which is why he has been injected into the UN against the will of the people, like the rest of the GFH Bush government.

Check out the maps and explanations

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqR1qcWtnpg