Not even close.

Yes they should.

1. This letter is not an “attack” as some speculated, not “hate-filled” as others incriminated and not a proof of “Conspiracy Theory” as many panicked.

This letter is motivated by my respect to Judd, his professional qualities and trust in his judgment. Otherwise, I would not have wasted his time reading it (hopefully) and my time writing it.

This letter also serves as an example of unbiased search for truth and how to argue in a free-speech fashion in a democratic society that we (the people of USA) are. We all have a different intellectual background and different life experiences, so I have shared mine with Judd. It is up to him to recognize the value.

I do not have agenda. If you just be patient and exercise attention you might notice I am not very happy with extreme right politics either. In fact, one using enough attention while reading my comments, may have already noticed that, since this subject was touched in my discussions with fellow ThinkProgress members of audience.

I was irritated at times in my comments. But I never did ridicule anyone except in response to offense. Offense in discussions comes in variety of forms and shapes. If this subject (offense in discussions) found worthwhile – I will elaborate. One thing for sure – since I was on the site the level of explicit and offensive profanity on the site has decreased. Do I have anything to do with it? I think not. It is merely an observation.

2. The truly original and authentic message has been posted only at:

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/07/27/armitage-mideast/#comments

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/07/28/us-lebanon/#comments

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/07/26/new-nie/#comments

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/07/28/manage-calm/#comments

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/07/28/blair-advice/#comments

followed by my challenge to james riser (who admitted to the usage of other blog names) to continue the argument she/he put forward.

These 5 URLs are the only places on the Internet or any other media where authentic message was posted.

I know for many from the audience (for whatever reason) it would be hard to believe that one may actually be ethical enough not to use variety of names, not to place post on different web-sites and use one’s own thoughts and observations.

I am simply being ethical. That is one of my virtues and I intend to hold-on to it despite all the provocations. Believe me – I did have much harder challenges in my life. Being simply ethical is easy for me.

If it turns out my open letter to Judd makes its’ way to other web sites – I am not doing it; it is out of my control; it simply means someone liked them and found it worthwhile to distribute. For what I am being grateful not because of my deficient self-esteem but rather for my time spent did not go down in vain.

3. I also said that I am a professional software engineer (sorry, leftisnuts, but I am about to substantiate this).

My current project is to reverse-engineer and re-write Microsoft Windows transport communications core, so Windows clients can perform IP based communications in transport neutral fashion as UNIX and LINUX allow to.

Greatly appreciate everyone’s time spent on reading my posts. Thank you.

#341. Thx. I loved the post.

I have an outstanding debt to pay:

“tonight is slow…i welcome you to expand on your attack of what you believe are my epistemological roots…”

C’mon, com out – this is your last chance to claim the price.

Sir, I understand you are in charge of this outlet.

Seeing the style of this site management, I do not expect you do respond in any way

(well, maybe forbidding my blog name from the use; which would be quite consistent with the concept of freedom-of-speech you claim to support)

But,
I would greatly appreciate if you could spare a few moments of your most precious time to read this.

Below analysis is in no way includes, reflects or relates to blog posts that is a separate concern. It is solely based on your selection of news pieces presented and the comments made by your staff members that is a group of accredited professionals. The problem is what for and how the professional qualities of your staff are being used.

ThinkProgress News/Blogs web site currently is a perfect example of one out of many biased extreme-left ideological outlets. These kinds of media reflect features that are very characteristical of the purpose they serve and have been most common across the media in a past and nowadays.

The biased extreme-left ideological purpose they serve is a BRAINWASH of the worst kind, reminiscent of the worst examples of media abuse:

- Soviet Union’s total government-controlled brainwash machine
- propaganda machine by Dr. Joseph Goebbels

Specifically, there was no time when the Soviet’s propaganda had been worse then the body you, Judd, are in charge of. Even in the worst times Soviet propaganda did present facts, news and opinions from “the other side”, “the ideological enemy”.

You do not do that.

These claims are also supported by the following almost military style methods this site employs (in short – like Lenin said – “anything goes” kind of methods)

- the selection of negligent value news that further are being blown out of proportion with the goal to deceit and diverge the attention of your audience
- the elaborate selection of events presented within an article to serve the above goal
- the content of comments to the news made by your staff members serve the purpose of creating one-sided view; thus attempting to convince (brainwash) the reader as oppose to provide the reader with information, so the reader could build ones opinion on ones own

All the three items above are the 101 of propaganda brainwash.

In conclusion it is worthwhile to mention to you, Judd, that democracy is our heritage. It is the responsibility of mine and your generations to pass this heritage over to the next generations of Americans, hopefully making it stronger.

You, Judd, and your staff members are being used for the opposite purpose: to make democracy weaker, hopefully to diminish the political and intellectual influence of democracy.

Thank you very much for your time. Very Truly,

“# 324 SO, shouldn’t the native americans be bombing the shit out of the white house using this same argument. That double standard argument doesn’t hold water to sane people.”

Very clever, thank you Madam/Sir.

“Sarcasm is not your forte, is it?”

One joke differs from the other. In this case, the joke had a big part of truth in it. Get it?

“I am not into silly games. If you want to tell me something, just do it.”

You got it all backwards. You wanna know something – ask.

You are not paying cash for the answer, do u?

Are you aware of the religious fanatic that is in charge of Iran today?

Tracy, are you aware of the religious fanatic that is charge of America today? Just wondering.

i actually agree with something richard armitage said about the middle east.
surely these must be the end of times. but there’s no need to really panic……

http://www.freedomtofascism.com