Think Progress

It only took 3 years.

By Judd Legum on Aug 21st, 2006 at 2:09 pm

It only took 3 years.

During today’s press conference, President Bush said he supports making Plan B available without a prescription to women over 18.



28 Responses to “It only took 3 years.”

  1. The DLC are Frauds says:

  2. dlet says:

    Now only if he would support a Plan B in Iraq.


  3. Al Gore says:

    If this goes throught, I will finally have one good thing to say about bush. It should be regulated like condoms though, not like cigarettes.


  4. The DLC are Frauds says:

    It has already gone through jerkwad.


  5. MrBlueSky says:

    Excellent.

    Now… what about Plan B for teenaged girls (under 18) who are raped by their dads, uncles, neighbors, guardians, etc.????


  6. GSD says:

    Can Plan B be applied retroactively to the Connecticut for Joe Lieberman campaign?

    -GSD


  7. Joe Sixpack says:

    It has already gone through jerkwad.
    Comment by The DLC are Frauds

    Only took 6 years. Should help him in the polls just before November, though. I wonder if he OK’d that with Pat Robertson?

    Poor little sperm cell. All that work to get there first for friggin’ nothing.


  8. GSD says:

    Sperm murderer! I am telling Reverend Richard Land that there is a jizm holocaust about to be perpetrated by George W. Bush.

    -GSD


  9. lib4 says:

    Big day for Bush

    1. Saddam and Iraq HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH 9/11

    2. Plan B for women over 18

    Wow he killed 2 arguements for his BushBots in 30 minutes flat??

    How long til Tony Blow will come out with the obligatory correction of Bush’s support for Plan B statement. (Im sure Daddy Dobson is on the phone right now with ol Karl)


  10. n says:

    until the confirmation hearings are over. then he’s against it.

    lying piece of shit he is


  11. dlet says:

    It has already gone through jerkwad.
    Comment by The DLC are Frauds

    You sure about this? I thought It was on its way to be passed. Has it been finalized and made into legislation yet?
    Anyone?


  12. Joe Sixpack says:

    You sure about this? I thought It was on its way to be passed. Has it been finalized and made into legislation yet?
    Anyone?

    Comment by dlet

    Its a done deal. You can even buy it on line:



  13. Impeachcheneythenbush says:

    You sure about this? I thought It was on its way to be passed. Has it been finalized and made into legislation yet?
    Anyone?

    Comment by dlet — August 21, 2006 @ 2:59 pm

    This is not a legislative issue, but an FDA regulatory one.


  14. dlet says:

    #14,
    Thanks, but is it written in to regulation yet? Everything I have read so far says it is moving forward…nothing concrete.


  15. Joe Sixpack says:

    Thanks, but is it written in to regulation yet? Everything I have read so far says it is moving forward…nothing concrete.
    Comment by dlet

    What do you need to be convinced, dlet? The $99.00 to order it with?


  16. dlet says:

    Ouch, Joe. I just was asking because of the confimation of the new head of the FDA. The last time they said it would be passed through and after the confirmation they backtracked…or as in Texas….they lied. DLC are Frauds stated that this is already gone through…I can’t find it. But I will take the $99.00 anyway.


  17. dlet says:

    Joe,
    What you linked to was getting the drug with a prescription. I am talking about getting it without a prescription for over 18 yeard olds.


  18. Spudge_Boy says:

    FYI:

    Jose Padilla’s terrorism charge has been dropped.

    CNN
    August 21, 2006
    Judge drops Padilla terror charge
    http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/08/21/padilla.charge/index.html

    (CNN) — A federal judge in Miami has dismissed the lead terror count against Jose Padilla, the U.S. citizen once identified as a “dirty bomb” suspect and detained for three years without charges as an “enemy combatant.”

    U.S. District Judge Marcia Cooke tossed out the first of three counts in an indictment handed down last year, Padilla’s lawyer, Andrew Patel, told CNN.

    Also, one of the 23 Terror plotters has been released:

    August 21, 2006
    CNN
    Air terror ‘plot’: 11 charged
    http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/08/21/uk.terror/index.html

    LONDON, England (CNN) — Eleven of the 22 people still being held over an alleged plot to bomb trans-Atlantic airliners have been charged in the UK with terrorism offenses and will appear in court on Tuesday.

    Counter-terrorism prosecutor Susan Hemming said a 23rd person who was being held, a female suspect, has been released.


  19. The DLC are Frauds says:

    Who needs $99? I bet you could just bum afew off one of the twins.


  20. christian h. says:

    There is, of course, no scientific reason whatsoever for the 18 year age restriction. It may look like a victory (should this actually happen), but it sets a dangerous precedent, as it lets politics into the FDA regulatory process (even more so than it already is). If the drug is safe for over-the-counter sale, it should be available. Without ifs’n buts. In fact, teenagers are probably most likely to need it (in the UK, for example, the drug is dispensed by school nurses, no questions asked).


  21. mroom says:

    Wow, he’s had quite a revealing day with the press. If he keeps this up, the “powers” will stop letting him talk to the press at all.


  22. Joe Sixpack says:

    What you linked to was getting the drug with a prescription. I am talking about getting it without a prescription for over 18 yeard olds.
    Comment by dlet

    Now you got me, dlet, and I am the one who needs to say ouch. I checked out the web site and didn’t see anything about needing a prescription. Says you need to take it within 72 hours or it wouldn’t be effective. So if a woman does need to take one, time would be of the essence. If a woman missed on friday night, for example, and was forced to wait to see a doctor for a prescription, she would be screwed in more ways than one (pun intended).

    I thought of calling the pharmacy’s number, but how could I explain why a guy named “Joe” would need a morning after pill?


  23. dlet says:

    Joe,
    They would take your $99.00…even if you asked for it with a voice like Darth Vader…..believe me.


  24. Zooey says:

    With that endorsement from George W. Bush, I now feel so much better about f*cking.


  25. Jeff says:

    I wonder if Rove actually thinks this will help the GOP approval rating?


  26. Merv the perv says:

    Hey Zooey, how ’bout f*cking me ?


  27. Scarlette says:

    It’s always been available for $40 with a prescription, bizarre that it’s $99 online. I’m sure it’s a lot less at a pharmacy.

    I can see why they want the 18+ restriction, and I don’t entirely disagree with it. PLEASE READ THE REST OF THIS BEFORE JUDGING MY POINT OF VIEW ON THIS. Essentially, they’re afraid that someone who’s younger might be more irresponsible and use it for regular birth control. If you go to a clinic, they generally don’t require parents’ permission and they will counsel you on its’ proper use and whatnot.

    I found this out when I was 16 and went to the clinic alone for birth control pills- if you’re under 18 and go to a local clinic for “family planning services,” i.e. birth control/plan B/ abortions, they did not call your parents for permission because family planning is considered a private matter. The very good part about this is that they told you everything you needed to know on a scientific level- all the risks, all the tests that needed doing, and offered support. I’m 23 now and I’ve used Plan B twice before for broken condoms, and I know proper use and side effects and whatnot from having a good doctor. I wasn’t anywhere near as aware when I was 16. Each time I’ve taken it, I’ve been severely nauseaus, so and doctor will discuss these side effects with you so you know what you’re getting yourself into.

    My point is that they figure that, by the time you’re 18, all the risks are known and/or they’re far less liable for it. Below the age of 18 they may feel you still need education on what you’re putting in your body, and I can understand that. I worked at summer camp with kids, and, hate to say it, a lot of them aren’t that bright. Having a doctor telling them what they’re doing is a good decision. I think under-18 year olds should be allowed to get plan B without their parents’ having to sign off on it, but seeing a doctor isn’t asking too much.



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll