Comments on: Path to 9/11 Produced By Evangelical Activists Who Sought To ‘Transform Hollywood’ http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/ Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:40:06 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Carpets & Rugs http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/comment-page-2/#comment-4359036 Carpets & Rugs Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:29:43 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/#comment-4359036 <strong>Carpets & Rugs</strong> Carpets & Rugs

]]> By: Daria Werbowy Pic http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/comment-page-2/#comment-4318618 Daria Werbowy Pic Mon, 17 Mar 2008 01:03:47 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/#comment-4318618 <strong>Daria Werbowy Pic</strong> I Googled for something completely different, but found your page...and have to say thanks. nice read. Daria Werbowy Pic

I Googled for something completely different, but found your page…and have to say thanks. nice read.

]]> By: Daria Werbowy Josh Hartnett http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/comment-page-2/#comment-4318620 Daria Werbowy Josh Hartnett Mon, 17 Mar 2008 01:03:47 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/#comment-4318620 <strong>Daria Werbowy Josh Hartnett</strong> I Googled for something completely different, but found your page...and have to say thanks. nice read. Daria Werbowy Josh Hartnett

I Googled for something completely different, but found your page…and have to say thanks. nice read.

]]> By: Daria Werbowy http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/comment-page-2/#comment-4318622 Daria Werbowy Mon, 17 Mar 2008 01:03:47 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/#comment-4318622 <strong>Daria Werbowy</strong> I Googled for something completely different, but found your page...and have to say thanks. nice read. Daria Werbowy

I Googled for something completely different, but found your page…and have to say thanks. nice read.

]]> By: Cum Swallowing Cum Cum Eater http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/comment-page-2/#comment-4311930 Cum Swallowing Cum Cum Eater Sun, 16 Mar 2008 05:22:08 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/#comment-4311930 <strong>Cum Swallowing Cum Cum Eater</strong> I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view Cum Swallowing Cum Cum Eater

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

]]> By: Tinia http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/comment-page-2/#comment-861756 Tinia Sat, 23 Sep 2006 02:05:00 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/#comment-861756 bottom line.....grow up everyone! <strong>Take responsibility for your actions</strong>...if you don't like the outcome of who wins elections and how they run the country, then change it. Don't sit on your fat butts on your computers and write hateful remarks. IT'S A MOVIE FOR GOD SAKE! A movie..........who's to say that any movie made is true even if they say it is. I'm a Christian and as I watched Mel Gibson's, The Passion of the Christ, I saw things that were his interpretation. Who's to say it's entirely true or not....not me? I believe what I believe, and it makes me what I am. bottom line…..grow up everyone! Take responsibility for your actions…if you don’t like the outcome of who wins elections and how they run the country, then change it. Don’t sit on your fat butts on your computers and write hateful remarks. IT’S A MOVIE FOR GOD SAKE! A movie……….who’s to say that any movie made is true even if they say it is. I’m a Christian and as I watched Mel Gibson’s, The Passion of the Christ, I saw things that were his interpretation. Who’s to say it’s entirely true or not….not me? I believe what I believe, and it makes me what I am.

]]> By: p http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/comment-page-2/#comment-822752 p Fri, 15 Sep 2006 21:01:37 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/#comment-822752 On Thursday, September 14, 2006, University of The Nations and Youth With A Mission issued the following official statements: "Youth With A Mission (YWAM) is a non profit, international and interdenominational Christian organization. We are responsible for hundreds of health clinics, orphanages and schools around the world. We have a special emphasis on the developing world and are completely staffed by unpaid volunteers from 150 nations. We are not affiliated with any American political party and have no political agenda in that or any nation. We had no part in any funding of the ABC mini series THE PATH TO 9/11. John Dawson, President of Youth With A Mission International Auckland, New Zealand" "University of the Nations is a an international University with campuses in over 100 countries. It is affiliated with Youth With A Mission (YWAM) and has a special emphasis on bringing education to the developing world. Alumnus David Cunningham has opened doors for many of our film students. One of those opportunities was an internship for 6 of our students on the set of the mini series THE PATH TO 9/11. Our students had the privilege to observe parts of the production phase of the movie David directed. We have not contributed financially at any level to the TV movie THE PATH TO 9/11 and don't have any political affiliations in the many countries where our branches are located. Dr Thomas Bloomer PHD University of the Nations Provost Office of Academic Affairs Lausanne, Switzerland" On Thursday, September 14, 2006, University of The Nations and Youth With A Mission issued the following official statements:

“Youth With A Mission (YWAM) is a non profit, international and interdenominational Christian organization. We are responsible for hundreds of health clinics, orphanages and schools around the world. We have a special emphasis on the developing world and are completely staffed by unpaid volunteers from 150 nations.

We are not affiliated with any American political party and have no political agenda in that or any nation. We had no part in any funding of the ABC mini series THE PATH TO 9/11.
John Dawson, President of Youth With A Mission International Auckland, New Zealand”

“University of the Nations is a an international University with campuses in over 100 countries. It is affiliated with Youth With A Mission (YWAM) and has a special emphasis on bringing education to the developing world. Alumnus David Cunningham has opened doors for many of our film students. One of those opportunities was an internship for 6 of our students on the set of the mini series THE PATH TO 9/11. Our students had the privilege to observe parts of the production phase of the movie David directed.

We have not contributed financially at any level to the TV movie THE PATH TO 9/11 and don’t have any political affiliations in the many countries where our branches are located.
Dr Thomas Bloomer PHD University of the Nations Provost Office of Academic Affairs Lausanne, Switzerland”

]]> By: Johnny B http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/comment-page-2/#comment-819463 Johnny B Fri, 15 Sep 2006 02:34:05 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/#comment-819463 While surfing the WWW for info about the show, “The path to 9/11” I came across your site. I am a conservative and have been since I mistakenly voted for Jimmy Carter. Nice man / bad President. As I started reading the comments my initial thoughts were “where are we going and why are we in this hand basket”? I have a hard time understanding Bush haters. They seem bent on jumping in that hand basket and going along for the ride. I kept reading and as the time came for the actual airing of the show got closer I noticed the comments flavor seemed to change (with a small number of exceptions). After the show aired there was a definite change. Where were all the complaints from the left when Nowrasteh aired his show on Showtime “The Day Reagan Was Shot”? I was a day or so late watching “The path to 9/ll” since I recorded it on the DVR. It seems that with all of the whining and Bush bashing going on, the real thinkers out there might actually be paying attention. They might be starting to realize that we are at war. They might realize that we need to do something about this before it’s gone to far. They might realize that these extremist’s will not be content until every person on the face of the earth believes the way they do or they are removed from it. I believe the majority of people out there truly understand and will vote to put in office the people that will stand up and protect us from these terrorists. I don’t care if our elected officials are Democrat, Republican, Green, Blue, Black, White Christian or Atheist. The main objective of the Constitution of the United States of America is to protect its citizen’s from harm. There are other things, but that is A # 1 priority. The purpose of the Office of the President is to defend the Constitution. With the discussions of WMD’s, religious groups, political beliefs, TV show’s, etc. aside – the real and biggest problem we as a nation, or as a world population face today is our safety and well being……and these radical Islamist’s are a real threat to all of us. All politicians are crooks. We know that. They all lie. We know that too. They all play partisan, power grabbing politics. We are aware of that as well, but we don’t have to except these conditions. We can vote to change things. The people we are liberating can’t. You say, “We can’t liberate a country by sending in troops and bombs.” I’d ask you what you think of the Allied liberation of France, Belgium, Norway, Poland, Austria, etc. during WWII? You ask, “Why us? Why now?” I’d answer with the same thing Reagan said when asked about his efforts to bring down the USSR during the Cold War. “If not us….who? If not now….when?” We need to ban together as we did after 9/11 and defeat the radical extremist beliefs that are amongst us whether they are Islam, Christian or KKK. If we don’t, there will be no Constitution to defend. However, if it gets to that point it really won’t matter to any of us individually anyway because we will have either gone along for the ride in the hand basket or we will not be here anymore. I say, lets get them now, whatever it takes. I like being here and I will not go for that hand basket ride. All things considered, this world is a pretty nice place, don’t you think? Worth saving, don’t you think? While surfing the WWW for info about the show, “The path to 9/11” I came across your site. I am a conservative and have been since I mistakenly voted for Jimmy Carter. Nice man / bad President. As I started reading the comments my initial thoughts were “where are we going and why are we in this hand basket”? I have a hard time understanding Bush haters. They seem bent on jumping in that hand basket and going along for the ride. I kept reading and as the time came for the actual airing of the show got closer I noticed the comments flavor seemed to change (with a small number of exceptions). After the show aired there was a definite change. Where were all the complaints from the left when Nowrasteh aired his show on Showtime “The Day Reagan Was Shot”? I was a day or so late watching “The path to 9/ll” since I recorded it on the DVR. It seems that with all of the whining and Bush bashing going on, the real thinkers out there might actually be paying attention. They might be starting to realize that we are at war. They might realize that we need to do something about this before it’s gone to far. They might realize that these extremist’s will not be content until every person on the face of the earth believes the way they do or they are removed from it. I believe the majority of people out there truly understand and will vote to put in office the people that will stand up and protect us from these terrorists. I don’t care if our elected officials are Democrat, Republican, Green, Blue, Black, White Christian or Atheist. The main objective of the Constitution of the United States of America is to protect its citizen’s from harm. There are other things, but that is A # 1 priority. The purpose of the Office of the President is to defend the Constitution. With the discussions of WMD’s, religious groups, political beliefs, TV show’s, etc. aside – the real and biggest problem we as a nation, or as a world population face today is our safety and well being……and these radical Islamist’s are a real threat to all of us. All politicians are crooks. We know that. They all lie. We know that too. They all play partisan, power grabbing politics. We are aware of that as well, but we don’t have to except these conditions. We can vote to change things. The people we are liberating can’t. You say, “We can’t liberate a country by sending in troops and bombs.” I’d ask you what you think of the Allied liberation of France, Belgium, Norway, Poland, Austria, etc. during WWII? You ask, “Why us? Why now?” I’d answer with the same thing Reagan said when asked about his efforts to bring down the USSR during the Cold War. “If not us….who? If not now….when?” We need to ban together as we did after 9/11 and defeat the radical extremist beliefs that are amongst us whether they are Islam, Christian or KKK. If we don’t, there will be no Constitution to defend. However, if it gets to that point it really won’t matter to any of us individually anyway because we will have either gone along for the ride in the hand basket or we will not be here anymore. I say, lets get them now, whatever it takes. I like being here and I will not go for that hand basket ride. All things considered, this world is a pretty nice place, don’t you think? Worth saving, don’t you think?

]]> By: yolson http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/comment-page-2/#comment-810366 yolson Wed, 13 Sep 2006 06:58:38 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/#comment-810366 I SAW IT! IT WAS TERRIFIC!! ABC, thank you sooooooooooo much for airing this! Very thought provoking. I would like to hear what Muslims thought about it. I couldn't help but think that perhaps all the protesters who have written might use their efforts, not against "caring whistle blowers", but banding together for the annialation of terrorism! If I know YWAM, and I believe I do, they are praying for the Muslim world, the news media, ABC, America, terrorists, and politicians too. Would this be too hard for all to believe? Let's all join forces together and do away with an encroachment of evil that is seeking to take away our freedoms..... Yes! Freedom of Speech Freedom of Press Freedom of Religion Freedom of liberty Freedom of life and the pursuit to make movies, even if made by one who might be a Christian, caring about TRUTH. <strong></strong> I SAW IT!
IT WAS TERRIFIC!!
ABC, thank you sooooooooooo much for airing this! Very thought provoking. I would like to hear what Muslims thought about it.
I couldn’t help but think that perhaps all the protesters who have written might use their efforts, not against “caring whistle blowers”, but banding together for the annialation of terrorism!
If I know YWAM, and I believe I do, they are praying for the Muslim world, the news media, ABC, America, terrorists, and politicians too. Would this be too hard for all to believe?
Let’s all join forces together and do away with an encroachment of evil that is seeking to take away our freedoms…..
Yes! Freedom of Speech
Freedom of Press
Freedom of Religion
Freedom of liberty
Freedom of life
and the pursuit to make movies, even if made by one who might be a Christian, caring about TRUTH.

]]> By: Blog terms of use? Give me a break http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/comment-page-2/#comment-809763 Blog terms of use? Give me a break Wed, 13 Sep 2006 03:34:15 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/#comment-809763 [...] Yesterday - the 5th anniversary of 9/11 - I visited Think Progress to see their side of the Path to 9/11 story. [...] [...] Yesterday – the 5th anniversary of 9/11 – I visited Think Progress to see their side of the Path to 9/11 story. [...]

]]> By: Lou Vasquez http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/comment-page-2/#comment-808441 Lou Vasquez Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:58:58 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/#comment-808441 #81- Pertfectly put comrade. I honestly used to believe the left had mostly good ideas, unrealistic for a capitalist society perhaps, but the ideology seemed on track. The vision was pretty clear... It was the actual (government) execution of these programs that was always lacking. That was then. I've completely changed my point of view. It's clear to me now that the Democratic party has become a radical voice that will not only turn on, but furiously attack anybody or entity that doesn't fall in line with the new "Agenda". Nowhere is this more clear than in the recent events involving Joe Lieberman & now... ABC. Lieberman was the man you same people nominated as one of the 2 best suited to represent the party only 6 years ago. Today he is your newest enemy. Lieberman, like the rest of the Democratic party, voted to remove Sadam. But, because he held to his convictions & would not go back on his decision and cave-in (like everyonre else in the Party) he's been exhiled & ridiculed. Who changed? Joe... or the Party? Now ABC? Isn't this the same station that aired "Commander in Chief" for an entire season? Whereas the producers openly admitted that they wanted to warm the audience up to the idea of a woman in the Whitehouse? How about Desparate Housewives? Do you think the Christian right is behind that one too? ABC is owned by Disney! Disney is an extremely liberal company. Just like Apple (a great company btw, regardless of political ideology), Disney is a group that has openly embraced & sided w/liberal view points. Never stopped me from seeing Lion King. And as far as the Christian "right" is concerned... I'd bet at least 80% or more of all folks posting on this sight were brought up by parents with Christian values. So... guess your folks (your creators) were all dead wrong, huh? Which also means most of us (myself included) were brought up within a web of lies. A conspiracy from the get go. Actually fits in nicely with the rest of the Party talking points. So I ask... You all think the Republican party is scary? Take a look in the mirror, friends. There's a movement stirring in this land of ours. One that hates Christians, family values, and anyone or thing that disagrees with it's political "Agenda", as our comrade so eloquently put (81). And that, to me, compared to an administration that will be out of office in another 2 yrs, is truly <strong>SCARY.</strong> #81- Pertfectly put comrade.

I honestly used to believe the left had mostly good ideas, unrealistic for a capitalist society perhaps, but the ideology seemed on track. The vision was pretty clear… It was the actual (government) execution of these programs that was always lacking. That was then.
I’ve completely changed my point of view. It’s clear to me now that the Democratic party has become a radical voice that will not only turn on, but furiously attack anybody or entity that doesn’t fall in line with the new “Agenda”.
Nowhere is this more clear than in the recent events involving Joe Lieberman & now… ABC.
Lieberman was the man you same people nominated as one of the 2 best suited to represent the party only 6 years ago. Today he is your newest enemy. Lieberman, like the rest of the Democratic party, voted to remove Sadam. But, because he held to his convictions & would not go back on his decision and cave-in (like everyonre else in the Party) he’s been exhiled & ridiculed. Who changed? Joe… or the Party?
Now ABC? Isn’t this the same station that aired “Commander in Chief” for an entire season? Whereas the producers openly admitted that they wanted to warm the audience up to the idea of a woman in the Whitehouse? How about Desparate Housewives? Do you think the Christian right is behind that one too? ABC is owned by Disney! Disney is an extremely liberal company. Just like Apple (a great company btw, regardless of political ideology), Disney is a group that has openly embraced & sided w/liberal view points. Never stopped me from seeing Lion King.
And as far as the Christian “right” is concerned… I’d bet at least 80% or more of all folks posting on this sight were brought up by parents with Christian values. So… guess your folks (your creators) were all dead wrong, huh? Which also means most of us (myself included) were brought up within a web of lies. A conspiracy from the get go. Actually fits in nicely with the rest of the Party talking points.
So I ask… You all think the Republican party is scary? Take a look in the mirror, friends. There’s a movement stirring in this land of ours. One that hates Christians, family values, and anyone or thing that disagrees with it’s political “Agenda”, as our comrade so eloquently put (81).
And that, to me, compared to an administration that will be out of office in another 2 yrs, is truly SCARY.

]]> By: vincent scorza http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/comment-page-2/#comment-806168 vincent scorza Tue, 12 Sep 2006 01:32:49 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/#comment-806168 at 9.55 pm sunday- I DID NOT HAVE SEXUAL RELATIONS WITH THAT WOMEN-flashed across the screen -totally out of contex with the inaccurate account of the 93 bombing of the wtc arrest and convictions.get that in because half of their viewers switched to premium cable at 10. at 9.55 pm sunday- I DID NOT HAVE SEXUAL RELATIONS WITH THAT WOMEN-flashed across the screen -totally out of contex with the inaccurate account of the 93 bombing of the wtc arrest and convictions.get that in because half of their viewers switched to premium cable at 10.

]]> By: John Koetsier http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/comment-page-2/#comment-805664 John Koetsier Mon, 11 Sep 2006 23:16:04 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/#comment-805664 Details, please, details. (About the film.) I haven't seen it and I'm not an American. But if you're going to knock something, stop knocking the people who made it and give some details on why the film is innacurate. I followed the link you gave, and at that site as well, there's precious few details ... just a statement that the film is pro-Bush and anti-Clinton. I don't know if it is or not - I haven't watched it. But if you say it is, give me a concrete example, please. Or many concrete examples. Details, please, details. (About the film.)

I haven’t seen it and I’m not an American. But if you’re going to knock something, stop knocking the people who made it and give some details on why the film is innacurate.

I followed the link you gave, and at that site as well, there’s precious few details … just a statement that the film is pro-Bush and anti-Clinton. I don’t know if it is or not – I haven’t watched it.

But if you say it is, give me a concrete example, please. Or many concrete examples.

]]> By: not so easily taken http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/comment-page-2/#comment-804874 not so easily taken Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:31:59 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/#comment-804874 <em><strong>Wow...you all will believe anything that is said. Let me say, as a person involved with the leadership of YWAM... YWAM had nothing to do with the message or funding of this film. YWAM is NOT a right wing- fundamentalist evangelical organization. YWAM has nothing to do with the Religious Right. YWAM is MOSTLY made up of NON-AMERICANS, who don't care about all this or know what the religious right is. YWAM has TONS of DEMOCRATS in it. You guys are believing lies. This web-site is not to be trusted. You should all check your hearts for the obvious BIGOTRY you feel towards Christians. In light of the REAL FACTS I have just listed, shouldn't there be an inner alarm going off about the hateful prejudice against believers in our nation? You all are part of persecuting an organization that helps millions of people across the world.... Why exactly? Why are you all SO WILLING TO BELIEVE LIES ABOUT CHRISTIANS?</strong></em> Wow…you all will believe anything that is said. Let me say, as a person involved with the leadership of YWAM…

YWAM had nothing to do with the message or funding of this film.

YWAM is NOT a right wing- fundamentalist evangelical organization.

YWAM has nothing to do with the Religious Right.

YWAM is MOSTLY made up of NON-AMERICANS, who don’t care about all this or know what the religious right is.

YWAM has TONS of DEMOCRATS in it.

You guys are believing lies. This web-site is not to be trusted.

You should all check your hearts for the obvious BIGOTRY you feel towards Christians. In light of the REAL FACTS I have just listed, shouldn’t there be an inner alarm going off about the hateful prejudice against believers in our nation?

You all are part of persecuting an organization that helps millions of people across the world…. Why exactly? Why are you all SO WILLING TO BELIEVE LIES ABOUT CHRISTIANS?

]]> By: Nikita Sergeyevich http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/comment-page-2/#comment-800110 Nikita Sergeyevich Sun, 10 Sep 2006 21:52:11 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/#comment-800110 <strong>Comrades Bravo!</strong> These traitors at ABC are betrayers of our new mother land. Where I come from, this Robert A. Iger would be dragged through the streets in front of the tomb of our glorious leader Vladimir Lenin and shot in public. The producers, directors, writers and anyone associated with this propaganda would be picked up in the early hours of the morning by our State Security Chief Lavrenty Beria (The Black Hand) and taken to a Siberian labor camp never too be heard from again. For many years I have been loyal to ABC and the Pravda (truth) that our Socialist Liberal ally has put forth in order to progress our ultimate goal; the decline and absolute destruction of America and the capitalist traitorous pig’s like ABC. I ask you Mr. Robert A. Iger, “Have you no shame Sir”? Comrades, we must not give up the fight. It has taken us many years to groom you and your elected leaders. Remember what our great leader Nikita Khrushchev said: “ We can't expect the American People to jump from Capitalism to Communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving them small doses of Socialism, until they awaken one day to find that they have Communism " It’s more important now then ever before that we stand together and stay focused! We can not allow this abomination of propaganda to go forward. We must do whatever it takes to keep this film from airing on Sunday the 10th, 2006, we only have a few hours left. It is your duty as loyal Liberal Socialist Democrats to rise up in solidarity and put a stop to this immediately! Senator Harry Reid, one of our courageous and distinguished Senatorial leaders from the state of Nevada, reminded the capitalist traitorous pigs at ABC of their license from the FCC. Please Senator Reid, we’re your loyal comrades in arms and begging you to use all the glorious power you possess. You must stop this film! You must push forward with an iron fist and crush this despicable display of propaganda. If this film isn’t stopped from airing on ABC, Sunday night, I’m afraid all our efforts since the cold war and the aspirations of our great leaders from glorious years past and Nikita Khrushchev’s dreams and predictions will have been lost. If we loose now, the great Liberal Socialist Democratic Party, we have nurtured, will decline into the ash heaps of history never too be heard from again. You must!.... I repeat, you must contact our comrades in arms at their offices in Washington. Now I’ve done all the work all you have to do is contact our comrades below by e-mail or call: Clinton, Hillary Rodham- (D - NY) Class I 476 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-4451 Web Form: clinton.senate.gov/contact Reid, Harry- (D - NV) Class III 528 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-3542 Web Form: reid.senate.gov/contact/email_form.cfm Kerry, John F.- (D - MA) Class II 304 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-2742 Web Form: kerry.senate.gov/v3/contact/email.html Landrieu, Mary L.- (D - LA) Class II 724 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-5824 Web Form: landrieu.senate.gov/contact/index.cfm Levin, Carl- (D - MI) Class II 269 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-6221 Web Form: levin.senate.gov/contact/index.cfm Rockefeller, John D., IV- (D - WV) Class II 531 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-6472 Web Form: rockefeller.senate.gov/services/email.cfm Schumer, Charles E.- (D - NY) Class III 313 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-6542 Web Form: schumer.senate.gov/SchumerWebsite/contact/webform.cfm Kennedy, Edward M.- (D - MA) Class I 317 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-4543 Web Form: kennedy.senate.gov/senator/contact.cfm Feinstein, Dianne- (D - CA) Class I 331 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-3841 Web Form: feinstein.senate.gov/email.html Leahy, Patrick J.- (D - VT) Class III 433 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-4242 E-mail: senator_leahy@leahy.senate.gov Stabenow, Debbie- (D - MI) Class I 133 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-4822 Web Form: stabenow.senate.gov/email.htm Durbin, Richard- (D - IL) Class II 332 DIRKSEN SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-2152 Web Form: durbin.senate.gov/contact.cfm Lincoln, Blanche L.- (D - AR) Class III 355 DIRKSEN SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-4843 Web Form: lincoln.senate.gov/webform.html Feingold, Russell D.- (D - WI) Class III 506 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-5323 E-mail: russell_feingold@feingold.senate.gov Harkin, Tom- (D - IA) Class II 731 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-3254 Web Form: harkin.senate.gov/contact/contact.cfm Bayh, Evan- (D - IN) Class III 463 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-5623 Web Form: bayh.senate.gov/WebMail1.htm Biden, Joseph R., Jr.- (D - DE) Class II 201 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-5042 E-mail: senator@biden.senate.gov Boxer, Barbara- (D - CA) Class III 112 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-3553 Web Form: boxer.senate.gov/contact Menendez, Robert- (D - NJ) Class I 502 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-4744 Web Form: menendez.senate.gov/contact/contact.cfm Nelson, Bill- (D - FL) Class I 716 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-5274 Web Form: billnelson.senate.gov/contact/email.cfm Obama, Barack- (D - IL) Class III 713 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-2854 Web Form: obama.senate.gov/contact/ Byrd, Robert C.- (D - WV) Class I 311 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-3954 Web Form: byrd.senate.gov/byrd_email.html Cantwell, Maria- (D - WA) Class I 717 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-3441 Web Form: cantwell.senate.gov/contact/index.html Conrad, Kent- (D - ND) Class I 530 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-2043 Web Form: conrad.senate.gov/webform.html Dayton, Mark- (D - MN) Class I 123 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-3244 Web Form: dayton.senate.gov/contact/email.cfm Dodd, Christopher J.- (D - CT) Class III 448 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-2823 Web Form: dodd.senate.gov/index.php?q=node/3130 Comrades Bravo!

These traitors at ABC are betrayers of our new mother land. Where I come from, this Robert A. Iger would be dragged through the streets in front of the tomb of our glorious leader Vladimir Lenin and shot in public. The producers, directors, writers and anyone associated with this propaganda would be picked up in the early hours of the morning by our State Security Chief Lavrenty Beria (The Black Hand) and taken to a Siberian labor camp never too be heard from again.

For many years I have been loyal to ABC and the Pravda (truth) that our Socialist Liberal ally has put forth in order to progress our ultimate goal; the decline and absolute destruction of America and the capitalist traitorous pig’s like ABC.

I ask you Mr. Robert A. Iger, “Have you no shame Sir”?

Comrades, we must not give up the fight. It has taken us many years to groom you and your elected leaders.

Remember what our great leader Nikita Khrushchev said:

“ We can’t expect the American People to jump from Capitalism to Communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving them small doses of Socialism, until they awaken one day to find that they have Communism ”

It’s more important now then ever before that we stand together and stay focused! We can not allow this abomination of propaganda to go forward.

We must do whatever it takes to keep this film from airing on Sunday the 10th, 2006, we only have a few hours left.

It is your duty as loyal Liberal Socialist Democrats to rise up in solidarity and put a stop to this immediately!

Senator Harry Reid, one of our courageous and distinguished Senatorial leaders from the state of Nevada, reminded the capitalist traitorous pigs at ABC of their license from the FCC. Please Senator Reid, we’re your loyal comrades in arms and begging you to use all the glorious power you possess. You must stop this film! You must push forward with an iron fist and crush this despicable display of propaganda.

If this film isn’t stopped from airing on ABC, Sunday night, I’m afraid all our efforts since the cold war and the aspirations of our great leaders from glorious years past and Nikita Khrushchev’s dreams and predictions will have been lost.

If we loose now, the great Liberal Socialist Democratic Party, we have nurtured, will decline into the ash heaps of history never too be heard from again.

You must!…. I repeat, you must contact our comrades in arms at their offices in Washington.

Now I’ve done all the work all you have to do is contact our comrades below by e-mail or call:

Clinton, Hillary Rodham- (D – NY) Class I
476 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-4451
Web Form: clinton.senate.gov/contact

Reid, Harry- (D – NV) Class III
528 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-3542
Web Form: reid.senate.gov/contact/email_form.cfm

Kerry, John F.- (D – MA) Class II
304 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-2742
Web Form: kerry.senate.gov/v3/contact/email.html

Landrieu, Mary L.- (D – LA) Class II
724 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-5824
Web Form: landrieu.senate.gov/contact/index.cfm

Levin, Carl- (D – MI) Class II
269 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-6221
Web Form: levin.senate.gov/contact/index.cfm

Rockefeller, John D., IV- (D – WV) Class II
531 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-6472
Web Form: rockefeller.senate.gov/services/email.cfm

Schumer, Charles E.- (D – NY) Class III
313 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-6542
Web Form: schumer.senate.gov/SchumerWebsite/contact/webform.cfm

Kennedy, Edward M.- (D – MA) Class I
317 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-4543
Web Form: kennedy.senate.gov/senator/contact.cfm

Feinstein, Dianne- (D – CA) Class I
331 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-3841
Web Form: feinstein.senate.gov/email.html

Leahy, Patrick J.- (D – VT) Class III
433 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-4242
E-mail: senator_leahy@leahy.senate.gov

Stabenow, Debbie- (D – MI) Class I
133 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-4822
Web Form: stabenow.senate.gov/email.htm

Durbin, Richard- (D – IL) Class II
332 DIRKSEN SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-2152
Web Form: durbin.senate.gov/contact.cfm

Lincoln, Blanche L.- (D – AR) Class III
355 DIRKSEN SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-4843
Web Form: lincoln.senate.gov/webform.html

Feingold, Russell D.- (D – WI) Class III
506 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-5323
E-mail: russell_feingold@feingold.senate.gov

Harkin, Tom- (D – IA) Class II
731 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-3254
Web Form: harkin.senate.gov/contact/contact.cfm

Bayh, Evan- (D – IN) Class III
463 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-5623
Web Form: bayh.senate.gov/WebMail1.htm

Biden, Joseph R., Jr.- (D – DE) Class II
201 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-5042
E-mail: senator@biden.senate.gov

Boxer, Barbara- (D – CA) Class III
112 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-3553
Web Form: boxer.senate.gov/contact

Menendez, Robert- (D – NJ) Class I
502 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-4744
Web Form: menendez.senate.gov/contact/contact.cfm

Nelson, Bill- (D – FL) Class I
716 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-5274
Web Form: billnelson.senate.gov/contact/email.cfm

Obama, Barack- (D – IL) Class III
713 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-2854
Web Form: obama.senate.gov/contact/

Byrd, Robert C.- (D – WV) Class I
311 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-3954
Web Form: byrd.senate.gov/byrd_email.html

Cantwell, Maria- (D – WA) Class I
717 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-3441
Web Form: cantwell.senate.gov/contact/index.html

Conrad, Kent- (D – ND) Class I
530 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-2043
Web Form: conrad.senate.gov/webform.html

Dayton, Mark- (D – MN) Class I
123 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-3244
Web Form: dayton.senate.gov/contact/email.cfm

Dodd, Christopher J.- (D – CT) Class III
448 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-2823
Web Form: dodd.senate.gov/index.php?q=node/3130

]]> By: YWAMer http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/comment-page-2/#comment-799950 YWAMer Sun, 10 Sep 2006 21:19:09 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/#comment-799950 A NOTE FROM ANOTHER YWAMer... I have to say that it is nuts the way that our school of FILM is being railed on as some subversive plot to infiltrate Hollywood. We are a University as well as a missions organization. We have classes on film and acting, as well as classes on creating sustainable farms in the third world. We want to be a positive influence in the world? Is that a crime? Is that a covert plan? Last I heard, it was commendable. YWAM knows media is an important voice in the world. All those quotes on the web about the Film Institute have construed it to be a "covert evangelical plot". Are we all a little paranoid out there? I mean...come on! <strong>And the web pages about the Film Institute that are "mysteriously missing" have probably been pulled because random YWAMers...who have nothing to do with any of this controversy are being tracked down and hounded by the media and could get death threats, etc. (People involved with this film are getting death threats.) YWAMers names and contact info were on those pages. So, there is the secret to the big cover up. </strong> <em> The Film Institute simply wants to encourage Christians to be a part of Hollywood. That town and industry are not easy things to become a part of as Hollywood tends to discriminate against believers. Case and point this movie and the attacks on YWAM</em>. David Cunningham is not some undercover agent out to take over the media industry. He is a guy who loves to direct films and is also a Christian. The Film Institute is not a "plot", it's just a way for David to help aspiring film directors, etc. The University his Father founded is a natural way to find these aspiring future Hollywood types. I do believe many, many players in Hollywood also like to help out those who are aspiring to be a voice in the media? "Transforming" Hollywood is a big, inspiring word for the hope the University of Nations has to see its graduates become a positive, influencing voice. It's a hope to produce films and shows and screen plays that inspire faith and the better things in humanity...It's a hope to train actors who will actually grow up to be people you WANT your child to look up to. That's our big master plan. <em>So in case you are worried about Christians being in Hollywood, I'll say it more plainly. Nobody is planning to control your mind, beliefs or values. I KNOW YWAM has no interest in controlling political parties.</em> I mean, really, is there no room in Hollywood for people who want to inspire, uplift and challenge humanity to find the best in themselves? To question and explore the greater truths about why we are here and is there a God? We seem to have room for Snakes on a Plane. (Which is a great title by the way!) <strong>Do we really think it's a crime for Christians to be a part of Hollywood? The media and especially this website sure is treating it as so. Last I checked,the founders of America came to escape religious persecution.</strong> A NOTE FROM ANOTHER YWAMer…

I have to say that it is nuts the way that our school of FILM is being railed on as some subversive plot to infiltrate Hollywood. We are a University as well as a missions organization. We have classes on film and acting, as well as classes on creating sustainable farms in the third world. We want to be a positive influence in the world? Is that a crime? Is that a covert plan? Last I heard, it was commendable.

YWAM knows media is an important voice in the world. All those quotes on the web about the Film Institute have construed it to be a “covert evangelical plot”. Are we all a little paranoid out there? I mean…come on!

And the web pages about the Film Institute that are “mysteriously missing” have probably been pulled because random YWAMers…who have nothing to do with any of this controversy are being tracked down and hounded by the media and could get death threats, etc. (People involved with this film are getting death threats.) YWAMers names and contact info were on those pages. So, there is the secret to the big cover up.

The Film Institute simply wants to encourage Christians to be a part of Hollywood. That town and industry are not easy things to become a part of as Hollywood tends to discriminate against believers. Case and point this movie and the attacks on YWAM.

David Cunningham is not some undercover agent out to take over the media industry. He is a guy who loves to direct films and is also a Christian. The Film Institute is not a “plot”, it’s just a way for David to help aspiring film directors, etc. The University his Father founded is a natural way to find these aspiring future Hollywood types. I do believe many, many players in Hollywood also like to help out those who are aspiring to be a voice in the media?

“Transforming” Hollywood is a big, inspiring word for the hope the University of Nations has to see its graduates become a positive, influencing voice. It’s a hope to produce films and shows and screen plays that inspire faith and the better things in humanity…It’s a hope to train actors who will actually grow up to be people you WANT your child to look up to. That’s our big master plan. So in case you are worried about Christians being in Hollywood, I’ll say it more plainly. Nobody is planning to control your mind, beliefs or values. I KNOW YWAM has no interest in controlling political parties.

I mean, really, is there no room in Hollywood for people who want to inspire, uplift and challenge humanity to find the best in themselves? To question and explore the greater truths about why we are here and is there a God? We seem to have room for Snakes on a Plane. (Which is a great title by the way!)

Do we really think it’s a crime for Christians to be a part of Hollywood? The media and especially this website sure is treating it as so.
Last I checked,the founders of America came to escape religious persecution.

]]> By: Leigh http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/comment-page-2/#comment-799758 Leigh Sun, 10 Sep 2006 20:15:29 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/#comment-799758 <em><strong>As a member of YWAM and also a friend to the director of 9/11</strong></em>, I have to say that I am astounded by the claim that YWAM was some subversive agent in this film. This reporting and assessment of who David Cunningham is and YWAM's involvement is so wrong it's laughable. Laughing is pretty much what we YWAMers are doing, except for the fact that these allogations could damage David's career. What is being reported is rubbish. How do I know? Because I am getting my information FIRST HAND. My faith in the accuracy of the new media has been killed. My belief in the integrity of the demoratic party has desolved. And, honestly, I must say that people will believe anything, if it is in-line with their preconceived biases. Do you know many groups of missionaries who could pull together 40 million dollars simply to make a political statement? It's absolutely crazy. There is no truth what-so-ever to this completely irresponsible reporting. YWAM is interested in building homes for AIDS orphans, re-habilitaing prostitutes in the third world, protecting children at risk, etc. Political statements are not even on our radar when it comes to our heart or priorities. If we had 40 million dollars, we'd FEED people, not attack the democratic party. In fact, MANY American YWAMers are democrats! In fact, we're only 26% American...the majority of YWAMer's don't even live in our country or vote. David just happens to be the son of the Founder of YWAM. David's sister ran a pre-school on the set of 9/11 in Toronto. Is that a subversive plot to destroy the democratic image? Actually, it appears to me, as a person who is actually not very intersested in politics, that the democratic party and the news stations it has in its pockets will go to any length to destroy this film, even if it means reporting lies and abusing freedom of speech. So, my faith in God is still in tact. But, my faith in the integrity of the news media and the democratic party has been dashed to pieces. Such a shame, since I was one of those swing votes. As a member of YWAM and also a friend to the director of 9/11, I have to say that I am astounded by the claim that YWAM was some subversive agent in this film. This reporting and assessment of who David Cunningham is and YWAM’s involvement is so wrong it’s laughable. Laughing is pretty much what we YWAMers are doing, except for the fact that these allogations could damage David’s career. What is being reported is rubbish. How do I know? Because I am getting my information FIRST HAND.

My faith in the accuracy of the new media has been killed. My belief in the integrity of the demoratic party has desolved. And, honestly, I must say that people will believe anything, if it is in-line with their preconceived biases.

Do you know many groups of missionaries who could pull together 40 million dollars simply to make a political statement? It’s absolutely crazy. There is no truth what-so-ever to this completely irresponsible reporting.

YWAM is interested in building homes for AIDS orphans, re-habilitaing prostitutes in the third world, protecting children at risk, etc. Political statements are not even on our radar when it comes to our heart or priorities. If we had 40 million dollars, we’d FEED people, not attack the democratic party. In fact, MANY American YWAMers are democrats! In fact, we’re only 26% American…the majority of YWAMer’s don’t even live in our country or vote.

David just happens to be the son of the Founder of YWAM. David’s sister ran a pre-school on the set of 9/11 in Toronto. Is that a subversive plot to destroy the democratic image? Actually, it appears to me, as a person who is actually not very intersested in politics, that the democratic party and the news stations it has in its pockets will go to any length to destroy this film, even if it means reporting lies and abusing freedom of speech.

So, my faith in God is still in tact. But, my faith in the integrity of the news media and the democratic party has been dashed to pieces. Such a shame, since I was one of those swing votes.

]]> By: Truthseeker http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/comment-page-2/#comment-799318 Truthseeker Sun, 10 Sep 2006 18:10:18 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/#comment-799318 It's interesting that Christians never force anyone to embrace there beliefs. However they do express them and have every right to do so. You should be more concerned with those Islamic terrorists who blow themselves up along with innocent women and children perhaps you, your wife and your children someday if you don't embrace their religion. Now regardless of the Path to 9/11 lets look at some facts we already know or should know. Of course the Democrats are upset by this miniseries. It’s painful to be reminded of your incompetence and your traitorous leaders. Start with Madeline Albright who has made statements to the fact that the U.S. was too powerful and this was unfair to other nations. No telling what damage she did to try to equalize this terribly unfair situation. She should have been fired on the spot. Then there’s Sandy Burglar who stole documents out of the National archives by stuffing them in his socks and shorts and calling this an accident (sure Sandy). What embarrassing information in the Clinton administration was he trying to cover up? Who helped him to skate with a slap on the wrist? How about Jamie Gorelick who put up a barrier between investigative organizations preventing the sharing of information that could have led to the exposing of the 9/11 plot? She sat on the wrong side of the aisle in the 9/11 commission. What an outrage! Then there’s the commander in heat who was to busy doing other things to want Bin Laden handed over to him when it was known he was behind acts of terrorism against us and our embassies. He also, according to Bin Laden, had given America a paper tiger appearance by his backing down in attacks that occurred on us and our troops such that occurred in Somalia and on the U.S.S. Cole. Again, there was the Iraq debacle. The inspectors were kicked out in 1998 and I thought surely we’ll be back in short order. Six months went by …nothing, another six months …nothing, more PAPER TIGER. Two years passed and no inspections with the “sitting on its hands administration”. Who knows what Saddam did in those vacant years? And we all know how effective the sanctions in Iraq proved to be. Many members of the worthless U.N. and there friends were taking bribes rendering those sanctions null and void. If Kofi was exonerated as the head of the U.N. then maybe Ken Lay as the head of Enron should also been exonerated. I could go on but it’s too depressing. Why doesn’t some investigative reporter look into “Able Danger”? Are they all too biased and don’t want to uncover more embarrassment? Then the Democrats threaten the licensing of ABC after accusing the Bush administration of infringing on peoples rights with his programs in defense of terrorism. What hypocrisy! Does anybody really want the ineptness of the Democrats in office during these times? I hope not. It’s interesting that Christians never force anyone to embrace there beliefs. However they do express them and have every right to do so.
You should be more concerned with those Islamic terrorists who blow themselves up along with innocent women and children perhaps you, your wife and your children someday if you don’t embrace their religion.
Now regardless of the Path to 9/11 lets look at some facts we already know or should know.
Of course the Democrats are upset by this miniseries. It’s painful to be reminded of your incompetence and your traitorous leaders. Start with Madeline Albright who has made statements to the fact that the U.S. was too powerful and this was unfair to other nations.
No telling what damage she did to try to equalize this terribly unfair situation. She should have been fired on the spot. Then there’s Sandy Burglar who stole documents out of the National archives by stuffing them in his socks and shorts and calling this an accident (sure Sandy). What embarrassing information in the Clinton administration was he trying to cover up? Who helped him to skate with a slap on the wrist? How about Jamie Gorelick who put up a barrier between investigative organizations preventing the sharing of information that could have led to the exposing of the 9/11 plot? She sat on the wrong side of the aisle in the 9/11 commission. What an outrage! Then there’s the commander in heat who was to busy doing other things to want Bin Laden handed over to him when it was known he was behind acts of terrorism against us and our embassies. He also, according to Bin Laden, had given America a paper tiger appearance by his backing down in attacks that occurred on us and our troops such that occurred in Somalia and on the U.S.S. Cole. Again, there was the Iraq debacle. The inspectors were kicked out in 1998 and I thought surely we’ll be back in short order. Six months went by …nothing, another six months …nothing, more PAPER TIGER. Two years passed and no inspections with the “sitting on its hands administration”. Who knows what Saddam did in those vacant years? And we all know how effective the sanctions in Iraq proved to be. Many members of the worthless U.N. and there friends were taking bribes rendering those sanctions null and void. If Kofi was exonerated as the head of the U.N. then maybe Ken Lay as the head of Enron should also been exonerated. I could go on but it’s too depressing. Why doesn’t some investigative reporter look into “Able Danger”? Are they all too biased and don’t want to uncover more embarrassment? Then the Democrats threaten the licensing of ABC after accusing the Bush administration of infringing on peoples rights with his programs in defense of terrorism. What hypocrisy!
Does anybody really want the ineptness of the Democrats in office during these times?
I hope not.

]]> By: troll alert http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/comment-page-2/#comment-797326 troll alert Sun, 10 Sep 2006 07:43:29 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/#comment-797326 # 75: Someone is posing as Mighty Aphrodite. # 75 is an impostor,and not Mighty Aphrodite. TROLL ALERT !! # 75:

Someone is posing as Mighty Aphrodite.
# 75 is an impostor,and not Mighty Aphrodite.

TROLL ALERT !!

]]> By: bonesTwo http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/comment-page-2/#comment-796447 bonesTwo Sun, 10 Sep 2006 02:25:18 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/08/origin-of-pt911/#comment-796447 nice take original bones - but my point is simply that I am STILL struggling to find your outrage about the Dem lying cheating and stealing. Not that two wrongs make a right - but that your selective outrage reveals you for the left wing kook that Im certain you are. It is as if this movie has suddenly stirred your desire for media objectivity. Congratulations. nice take original bones – but my point is simply that I am STILL struggling to find your outrage about the Dem lying cheating and stealing. Not that two wrongs make a right – but that your selective outrage reveals you for the left wing kook that Im certain you are.

It is as if this movie has suddenly stirred your desire for media objectivity. Congratulations.

]]>