Comments on: Director Defends Accuracy of Path to 9/11: ‘We Have Our CIA Consultants and Clinton Has His’

By: Gay Sex Gay Twinks Gay Hunks

Gay Sex Gay Twinks Gay Hunks — Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:54:14 +0000

Gay Sex Gay Twinks Gay Hunks

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

By: Gay Incest Old Gay Men Gay Male Galleries

Gay Incest Old Gay Men Gay Male Galleries — Sun, 13 Apr 2008 12:26:36 +0000

Gay Incest Old Gay Men Gay Male Galleries

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

By: Gay Sex Gay Ass Gay Ass

Gay Sex Gay Ass Gay Ass — Mon, 07 Apr 2008 15:24:23 +0000

Gay Sex Gay Ass Gay Ass

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

By: Pirates Of The Caribbean Posters

Pirates Of The Caribbean Posters — Sun, 06 Apr 2008 11:15:18 +0000

Pirates Of The Caribbean Posters

I can’t wait to get back to Grand Cayman for my next vacation but I don’t think the current dollar exchange rate will hold up for long.

By: Auto Loans

Auto Loans — Sat, 05 Apr 2008 11:23:49 +0000

Auto Loans

Carroll in the past put in to get an auto loan and got approved right away , leaving aside there horrible money problems !

By: Health Insurance California Health Insurance Michigan Health Insurance

Health Insurance California Health Insurance Michigan Health Insurance — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:07:44 +0000

Health Insurance California Health Insurance Michigan Health Insurance

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

By: Gay Sex Gay Teen Gay Men Having Sex

Gay Sex Gay Teen Gay Men Having Sex — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 01:59:55 +0000

Gay Sex Gay Teen Gay Men Having Sex

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

By: bathroom wc

bathroom wc — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 21:01:06 +0000

bathroom wc

Nice Post… do you know what is the first? Maybe You can se My Post Here

By: Distance Learning Teachers Having Sex With Students Very Hot School Girls

Distance Learning Teachers Having Sex With Students Very Hot School Girls — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:55:21 +0000

Distance Learning Teachers Having Sex With Students Very Hot School Girls

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

By: Nutritional Supplements Weight Loss Weight Loss

Nutritional Supplements Weight Loss Weight Loss — Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:51:38 +0000

Nutritional Supplements Weight Loss Weight Loss

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

By: Reviews Of Digital Hearing Aids

Reviews Of Digital Hearing Aids — Sun, 23 Mar 2008 09:32:11 +0000

Reviews Of Digital Hearing Aids

Interesting – because that is the same thing I found out last Thursday.

By: Sex Girls Having Sex Rough Sex

Sex Girls Having Sex Rough Sex — Sat, 22 Mar 2008 16:13:02 +0000

Sex Girls Having Sex Rough Sex

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

By: Gay Sex Gay Sex Videos Black Gay Men

Gay Sex Gay Sex Videos Black Gay Men — Sat, 22 Mar 2008 04:23:51 +0000

Gay Sex Gay Sex Videos Black Gay Men

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

By: Rug Lover

Rug Lover — Fri, 21 Mar 2008 11:40:22 +0000

Rug Lover

By: inyergub

inyergub — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 08:39:07 +0000

I have been hearing this production being much maligned by liberal rage. I don’t blame you. You got a raw deal Three yrs. ago. first we saw Bon Jovie, then it was “bon voyagie Kerry”, and the wound has grown septic. I have noted comments on innumerable sites, which describe path to 9/11 in terms such as, “amateurish and poorly constructed.” Follow up commentary usually will say something like, “where’s that great liberal media conspiracy you conservatives so readily speak of, which you (we) say ever resigns perception of your (our) values to a marginal and dank corner (despite the fact that it is the majority in truth who are cornered and gagged).” Liberals have strayed so far from reality as to now refer to ABC as a conservative lair and tool. So now, what can one say to such cosmopolitan and educated speech? Well, it ain’t too tough now is it? In response to the described critique (”amateurish and poorly constructed, at best”). “Where is Dan Rather, and why is his career all but over, along with (like Clinton) his reputation and legacy?” In response to the question, (”where is the liberal media conspiracy conservatives speak of ?” ). “Where is Dan Rather, and why is his career over (+) ? ” In response to the implication, (”ABC is a right wing media tool”). “Where is Dan Rather, and why is his career all but over (+) ?” Has there ever been a more “amateurish or poorly constructed, (at best)” story than the one that brought down Dan ? The left must be finding their faith, because they took that story on “faith”, with no critical or reasonable logic employed (except if one applies an unsavory logic, as opposed to just merely illogic). Has there ever been a more telling tale as to media slant, than the 60 minutes tale that brought down Babble-0n (CBS-Dan) ? Now, feel free to babble on, you smarmy, divisive, disingenuous, unpatriotic, racist, traitorous, ……………….. You will continue to lose elections, and to slide into the obscurity you claim you know in your brave and defiant stance against the greater forces of this barbarian culture you so despise, and against whom you claim your secular purity through your refusal to coalesce. The beauty is, you will never know why, but you will surely know when to shut up, as you so well knew not to defend against the open assault on liberty when cultural threat and coercion revealed that its true face was far grimmer than the enemy you do dare defile (Americans). I’m of course talking about the months of murder, chaos and calamity associated with the Muhammad cartoons. I understand. These are your brethren, with whom you feel great kinship (an enemy of my enemy, if you will), though the sentiment be so ruefully unrequited, and tolerances incompatible with reality. You sure had a long time on that one (Danish cartoon incident) to show your metal, and to stand for liberty, as you do so against the rabble majority here in America, which of course is ever over represented by the detestable â€œconservativeâ€ media. Why I remember just a couple yrs. back. Artists in America demonstrated their reverence for Christian tradition by sculpting depictions of Christ, whittled from a piece of $#!+ (literally), and Mary was consigned to a watery roll in a bottle of p!$$ (literally), and I will not tarnish your own lustrous and bronze self cast by saying that you did not so defend Christians with willful silence in the way that you did so defend your Muslim brothers on this fore mentioned occasion. Against Christians, you defended liberty, and stated that the putrid depictions of our sacred were merely true and commendable expression, and to be more than defended, but admired. In the case of the Muhammad cartoons, you defended liberty not so similarly, but with the blaring and deafening sound of crickets. Yes, you know when things truly are as you depict them, and it’s then that you know how to blend in to the American population the way al-Qaeda would do so.

By: Michael Won

Michael Won — Mon, 11 Sep 2006 08:19:45 +0000

I watched the movie. And it was great.

You know, I used to really admire Bill Clinton. And looked up to him. But when 9/11 happened, I couldn’t help but wonder “What was Clinton and Madeleine Albright doing?”

I think both of them should be held responsible for 9/11. It would be a true tragedy if they just run away with this.

By: Nikita Sergeyevich

Nikita Sergeyevich — Sun, 10 Sep 2006 21:50:02 +0000

Comrades Bravo!

These traitors at ABC are betrayers of our new mother land. Where I come from, this Robert A. Iger would be dragged through the streets in front of the tomb of our glorious leader Vladimir Lenin and shot in public. The producers, directors, writers and anyone associated with this propaganda would be picked up in the early hours of the morning by our State Security Chief Lavrenty Beria (The Black Hand) and taken to a Siberian labor camp never too be heard from again.

For many years I have been loyal to ABC and the Pravda (truth) that our Socialist Liberal ally has put forth in order to progress our ultimate goal; the decline and absolute destruction of America and the capitalist traitorous pigâ€™s like ABC.

I ask you Mr. Robert A. Iger, â€œHave you no shame Sirâ€?

Comrades, we must not give up the fight. It has taken us many years to groom you and your elected leaders.

Remember what our great leader Nikita Khrushchev said:

â€œ We can’t expect the American People to jump from Capitalism to Communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving them small doses of Socialism, until they awaken one day to find that they have Communism ”

Itâ€™s more important now then ever before that we stand together and stay focused! We can not allow this abomination of propaganda to go forward.

We must do whatever it takes to keep this film from airing on Sunday the 10th, 2006, we only have a few hours left.

It is your duty as loyal Liberal Socialist Democrats to rise up in solidarity and put a stop to this immediately!

Senator Harry Reid, one of our courageous and distinguished Senatorial leaders from the state of Nevada, reminded the capitalist traitorous pigs at ABC of their license from the FCC. Please Senator Reid, weâ€™re your loyal comrades in arms and begging you to use all the glorious power you possess. You must stop this film! You must push forward with an iron fist and crush this despicable display of propaganda.

If this film isnâ€™t stopped from airing on ABC, Sunday night, Iâ€™m afraid all our efforts since the cold war and the aspirations of our great leaders from glorious years past and Nikita Khrushchevâ€™s dreams and predictions will have been lost.

If we loose now, the great Liberal Socialist Democratic Party, we have nurtured, will decline into the ash heaps of history never too be heard from again.

You must!…. I repeat, you must contact our comrades in arms at their offices in Washington.

Now Iâ€™ve done all the work all you have to do is contact our comrades below by e-mail or call:

Clinton, Hillary Rodham- (D – NY) Class I
476 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-4451
Web Form: clinton.senate.gov/contact

Reid, Harry- (D – NV) Class III
528 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-3542
Web Form: reid.senate.gov/contact/email_form.cfm

Kerry, John F.- (D – MA) Class II
304 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-2742
Web Form: kerry.senate.gov/v3/contact/email.html

Landrieu, Mary L.- (D – LA) Class II
724 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-5824
Web Form: landrieu.senate.gov/contact/index.cfm

Levin, Carl- (D – MI) Class II
269 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-6221
Web Form: levin.senate.gov/contact/index.cfm

Rockefeller, John D., IV- (D – WV) Class II
531 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-6472
Web Form: rockefeller.senate.gov/services/email.cfm

Schumer, Charles E.- (D – NY) Class III
313 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-6542
Web Form: schumer.senate.gov/SchumerWebsite/contact/webform.cfm

Kennedy, Edward M.- (D – MA) Class I
317 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-4543
Web Form: kennedy.senate.gov/senator/contact.cfm

Feinstein, Dianne- (D – CA) Class I
331 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-3841
Web Form: feinstein.senate.gov/email.html

Leahy, Patrick J.- (D – VT) Class III
433 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-4242
E-mail: senator_leahy@leahy.senate.gov

Stabenow, Debbie- (D – MI) Class I
133 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-4822
Web Form: stabenow.senate.gov/email.htm

Durbin, Richard- (D – IL) Class II
332 DIRKSEN SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-2152
Web Form: durbin.senate.gov/contact.cfm

Lincoln, Blanche L.- (D – AR) Class III
355 DIRKSEN SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-4843
Web Form: lincoln.senate.gov/webform.html

Feingold, Russell D.- (D – WI) Class III
506 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-5323
E-mail: russell_feingold@feingold.senate.gov

Harkin, Tom- (D – IA) Class II
731 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-3254
Web Form: harkin.senate.gov/contact/contact.cfm

Bayh, Evan- (D – IN) Class III
463 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-5623
Web Form: bayh.senate.gov/WebMail1.htm

Biden, Joseph R., Jr.- (D – DE) Class II
201 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-5042
E-mail: senator@biden.senate.gov

Boxer, Barbara- (D – CA) Class III
112 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-3553
Web Form: boxer.senate.gov/contact

Menendez, Robert- (D – NJ) Class I
502 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-4744
Web Form: menendez.senate.gov/contact/contact.cfm

Nelson, Bill- (D – FL) Class I
716 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-5274
Web Form: billnelson.senate.gov/contact/email.cfm

Obama, Barack- (D – IL) Class III
713 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-2854
Web Form: obama.senate.gov/contact/

Byrd, Robert C.- (D – WV) Class I
311 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-3954
Web Form: byrd.senate.gov/byrd_email.html

Cantwell, Maria- (D – WA) Class I
717 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-3441
Web Form: cantwell.senate.gov/contact/index.html

Conrad, Kent- (D – ND) Class I
530 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-2043
Web Form: conrad.senate.gov/webform.html

Dayton, Mark- (D – MN) Class I
123 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-3244
Web Form: dayton.senate.gov/contact/email.cfm

Dodd, Christopher J.- (D – CT) Class III
448 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-2823
Web Form: dodd.senate.gov/index.php?q=node/3130

By: Dave von Ebers

Dave von Ebers — Sun, 10 Sep 2006 20:58:52 +0000

Bones (the REAL bones) – thanks for pointing out the private action/government action distinction YET AGAIN to these Republican posters. Jesus, I get soo tired of having to state the obvious.

I don’t think the government should interfere with a broadcast network airing this program because, although First Amendment rights are limited on public airwaves, they are not non-existent. Still, the issue here is whether private people protest against ABC – a perfectly appropriate use of OUR First Amendment rights.

It is funny, though, how conservatives “get religion” on the Bill of Rights as soon as they fell like their rights are threatened. As the old saying goes, “What do you call a conservative who’s been arrested? A liberal.”

By: bones

bones — Sun, 10 Sep 2006 11:32:17 +0000

WC – â€œThe Reagansâ€ was not cancelled. It was simply moved to a different network and aired with itâ€™s original script.
Comment by Guest â€” September 10, 2006 @ 12:56 am

So the republicans wanted “The Reagans” cancelled. So because there was controversy and potential liability, the film was moved off the “public” airwaves, where defamatory speech is illegal and moved it to a “private” cable channel where “public” airwaves laws don’t apply, although tort law still applies.

By: bones

bones — Sun, 10 Sep 2006 11:24:47 +0000

WC – â€œThe Reagansâ€ was not cancelled. It was simply moved to a different network and aired with itâ€™s original script. I didnâ€™t agree with how the Reagans were portrayed, but it is a free speech issue.Again folks, get a lifeâ€¦

Comment by Guest â€” September 10, 2006 @ 12:56 am

IT IS NOT A FREE SPEECH ISSUE. The First Amendment ONLY applies to the government stifling speech. If you want to protest free speech issues, then I guess you’ll be protesting Bush Free Speech Zones, arresting people from government evets wearing the “wrong” tshirts, barring people from government events because of bumper stickers on their cars in the parking lot, etc.

Airing defamatory media that adversley effects people’s reputations is NOT protected. First ABC put out a statement that this “docudrama” is a “true story based on the findings of the 9-11 Commision, and they know they are lying since every 9-11 Commisioner has written ABC/Disney and told them the film is a lie. Second, there is no government suppression of speech, people are pressuring ABC to prevent the showing, and since you’re a free speech proponent, then you are in full support of their right to free speech to do this.

Guest, get a consitent position and re-read the litigation on the First Amendment.