Think Progress

Bush’s “non-partisan” speech on 9/11

By Judd Legum on Sep 13th, 2006 at 11:29 am

Bush’s “non-partisan” speech on 9/11

“echoed his remarks at recent campaign appearances and in stump speeches during the 2004 presidential election.” Media Matters has details.



14 Responses to “Bush’s “non-partisan” speech on 9/11”

  1. lib4 says:

    One trick pony…….

    Hope someone will aske Tony Blow about this today…call him out…


  2. Snowhite says:

    Snowhite ‘guaranteed’ Bush would not use a commemoration as a political platform.
    Hey Tony, guess what? He lies as much to you as he does us.
    How’s it feel to be an information slave? You deserve this, but that’s another story.
    Bush, not only were you not on top of it during 9/11, you still aren’t.
    Worst President in history, hands down.
    Most hated man in the world, hands down.
    Congrats, you f*cked the whole thing up, just like the rest of your life.


  3. katy says:

    oh wow !!! did you all see the daily show last night?!?
    jon’s take on this was hilarious – dubya and little richard side-by-side!
    hopefully crooks and liars will post that video…
    i scared my little dog, i laughed so loud…

    oh, sorry… this is a serious thread…
    but of course that speech was political – and insufferable…


  4. lib4 says:

    Here is the Dubya-Little Richard video from last nite

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rY7oWVB75-Y


  5. IraqVet says:

    Question…

    Has BUSH ever been non-partisan???


  6. katy says:

    ahhhhh… thanks for that, lib4… hoo wee… ahhh…

    after reading about AAR just now, i needed that laugh again…
    that was fantastic…


  7. USA PATRIOT says:

    Right, because anything said at a campaign appearance is by definition “partisan”. If President Bush mentions the weather at a campaign appearance, that would make the weather partisan.

    And of course, in moonbat-land where [Don't]ThinkProgress resides, only Republicans are partisan, Democrats never are.

    If only the Democrats spent one-tenth the energy they direct at attacking the president on helping in the fight against America’s Islamist enemies.



  8. Willy says:

    As usual, “non-partisan” to the Republicans means to follow the president blindly.


  9. sunshine says:

    More lies and drivel…..blah, blah, blah…the same old crap. Shovel it somewhere else, Prez!


  10. PatrioticLiberalChristian(PLC) says:

    USA PATRIOT (like the rest of us aren’t!)
    Would it have been so difficult for Bush to let go of his attempts to connect 9-11 and Iraq just for one little day of mourning and rememberance? Or are those who swallowed the “connection” in danger of forgetting it in one day?

    OT – isn’t it fascinating how the trolls came out in droves on the Air America thread! They obviously have nothing to cheer about coming from the White House or Congress or State Legislatures. They needed something to feel “positive” about.


  11. Trinary Suka says:

    Bush is soft on Terror and Afghanistan proves it

    Prescott Bush supported Hitler while George supports Osama by going soft on his “number one priority”


  12. JPark says:

    Come on USA Patriot, isn’t it time to take that 3 month brush clearing vacation you desperately need?


  13. Zooey says:

    Non-partisan, my ass!

    GWB wouldn’t recognize non-partisan if he choked on it.



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll