Santorum curses at reporter.
By on Sep 18th, 2006 at 2:07 pm
Santorum curses at reporter.
“I have to raise tens of millions of dollars because of the junk you feed the people of Pennsylvania,” Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA) told the reporter, who had earlier mentioned the senator’s “rocky relations with the press.” Santorum “then used an expletive to describe the coverage and slammed down a newspaper.”
View Most Popular
Advertisement
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
Reports
In depth studies on select topics
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Afghanistan
Bailout
Big Oil
Bolton
Bush
Cheney
Civil Rights
Congress
Earmarks
Economy
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Global Warming
Guantanamo
Health Care
Immigration
International Relations
Iran
Iraq
Justice
Kristol
LGBT
Lieberman
McCain
McClellan
Media
Military
O'Reilly
Obama
Palin
Politics
Race
Radical Right
Religion
Rice
RNC Convention
Rove
Terrorism
Third Bush Term
Torture
Veterans
Wiretapping
Women's Rights
ArchivesBlog Roll
Thanks for the link, TP….Puts me in good mood:
Tightening races boost state GOP’s confidence
Sunday, September 17, 2006
BY BRETT LIEBERMAN
Of Our Washington Bureau
Anxious Pennsylvania Republicans head into the final stretch before Election Day more optimistic that the political environment has begun to shift in their favor.
Tightening polls in the U.S. Senate race, lower gasoline prices that have lessened public angst and improved approval ratings for President Bush are some of the reasons Republicans meeting in East Pennsboro Twp. feel encouraged for the first time in months.
September 18th, 2006 at 2:17 pmTesty, it’s the new GOP mantra.
September 18th, 2006 at 2:17 pmThe truth hurts, Ricky.
September 18th, 2006 at 2:17 pmWaWaWa
September 18th, 2006 at 2:20 pmLittle Ricky, Spreading Santorum again!
September 18th, 2006 at 2:20 pmNot very Christian like of him to speak that way, and it will hurt him.
How does raising 10 million have anything to do with Iran or what a reporter writes? I didn’t know that it took money, 10million, to tell the truth..
..say is the reporter Lieberman related to Joe Lieberman?
September 18th, 2006 at 2:21 pmOh sure…. Rick can dish OUT “the junk” which is fed to the people, but he can’t TAKE it.
ON RICKS ATTACK COMERCIAL:
“Santorum ad impugns ethics of Casey ‘team’; It portrays investigated men. None, however, has a formal campaign role.”
[Philadelphia Inquirer, September 14, 2006]
“The commercial is not altogether clear on several factual points. White, for instance, is not a member of Casey’s campaign team. He has been dead for more than 22 months.”
[Philadelphia Inquirer, September 14, 2006]
Source: Crossing the Line with Bob Casey
September 18th, 2006 at 2:21 pmTightening polls in the U.S. Senate race, lower gasoline prices that have lessened public angst and improved approval ratings for President Bush are some of the reasons Republicans meeting in East Pennsboro Twp. feel encouraged for the first time in months.
Comment by Exley
Ya know Exley, I ,a Christian, see Santorum acting like a unhinged fanatic of the scary Gary North mentality..you aren’t one of those ‘coulter republicans’ are you?
September 18th, 2006 at 2:27 pmSantorum: noun. The frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex. - - Ricky talked ‘dirty’? Anything resembling this…
“We like doing it in the bathtub so we can just wash away the santorum afterward.”
September 18th, 2006 at 2:29 pmIt’s so much fun watching Sanatorium and the rest go into melt down…
September 18th, 2006 at 2:29 pm(Santorum) complained about what he called biased coverage. - - Biased used here is, factualiness.
September 18th, 2006 at 2:32 pmSantorum will win because he fights homofascism. leftards
September 18th, 2006 at 2:34 pmLets not forget the Hoakstraw Santorum WMD ’story’ this joker lied about recently..Hoekstra’s Hoax: Just When You Thought You’d Seen Everything
No doubt they pledged to find more credible ways to shore up Santorum’s flagging … the donnybrook over the administration’s fatuous claims of WMD in Iraq, …
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0826-20.htm
I think Santorum belongs in a Sanitarium and he spent his 10 million on idiotic campaign propaganda and fake WMD
September 18th, 2006 at 2:35 pmSantorum will win. then what will you homofascists do?
September 18th, 2006 at 2:35 pm#8 Dick…
Nah, I don’t like Coulter. She is not a true conservative. She is the literary/ talk-show equivalent of a “shock jock” in the guise of a conservative who will say anything — no matter how outrageous, rude, or offensive — to gain attention and drive up book sales.
September 18th, 2006 at 2:37 pmnull this: “leftards” - - My birthday is in August which I guess makes me a leotard. (You trolls are such clever wordshmiths. No, really.)
September 18th, 2006 at 2:37 pmDont beleive polls even i can ring up 1003 people then keep records of republican votes of 333 and then ring up the at random another 666 telphone numbers and get results “well folks its anybodies race here its 50/50″
This has to happen by November to cheat with the voting machines they will tell you its 50/50 as not to look suspicious ????
Then its WW111
September 18th, 2006 at 2:38 pmOthers seem to have caught on to the descending price of a gallon of gasoine phenomenon as it relates to election cycles.
Big oil can afford to not make quite such a large profit margin for a few weeks, before they screw it to the American taxpayer following the elections, whether the legislators they own win re-election or not.
Imagine the screaming we’ll hear from the Bushiites when their poor misguided party loses control of the legislature……
September 18th, 2006 at 2:40 pmYupp it’s official Santorum is a full fledged member of the scary gary club of unhinged christians..
Deep Thoughts: Scary Gary, James Dobson, and public stoning
North has called for the stoning of gays and nonbelievers (rocks are cheap and plentiful, he has observed). Both friends and foes label him “Scary Gary.”
Sounds like Homofascist above yes?
September 18th, 2006 at 2:44 pmShe is not a true conservative
are you speaking of religious or political conservatism?
September 18th, 2006 at 2:45 pmnullthis
Fascism: A philosophy or system of government that is marked by stringent social and economic control, a strong, centralized government usually headed by a dictator, and often a policy of belligerent nationalism. (From The American Heritage Dictionary)
OK, so is Bush the head of our government homosexual, do our coins and dollar bills say “In Gay Sex We Trust”, is the U.S. military filled with belligerent homosexuals, and do we have a national policy of heterosexual oppression? Or did you just throw two concepts you don’t like together?
September 18th, 2006 at 2:46 pmyou know stop homofascismShe is not a true conservative
Define that ‘true conservative’..
I see you guys support corruption out the wazoo and every lie that passes across Bush and Cheney’s lying lips…..it’s not true nor is it conservative.
September 18th, 2006 at 2:51 pmWhat’s scary is that there are actual people in the United states that look at candidates like Santorum and think this is the best we can do for our country.
I have no problem with homosexuality. I have a problem with homosexual acts.
Isn’t that the ultimate homeland security, standing up and defending marriage?
A decade ago Republicans came to Washington promising to change it rather than to be changed by it. We have not reduced the size of government. There is no balanced budget amendment. Pork-barrel and self-interest politics have grown. Special interest groups haven’t been defeated or tamed, they are thriving.
“I mean, you have people who don’t heed those warnings (Katrina) and then put people at risk as a result of not heeding those warnings. There may be a need to look at tougher penalties on those who decide to ride it out and understand that there are consequences to not leaving
Earlier, Santorum had noted that “candidly, the Republican Party did not have a lot of ideas, regarding the poor.”
“where topics are taught that may generate controversy (such as biological evolution), the curriculum should help students to understand the full range of scientific views that exist.” If the Education Board of Ohio does not include intelligent design in the new teaching standards, many students will be denied a first-rate science education.
Santorum said he would like to see more use of nuclear power - which is a “very safe and clean” energy source - and more coal mining in Pennsylvania
“The notion that college education is a cost-effective way to help poor, low-skill unmarried mothers with high school diplomas or GED’s move up the economic ladder is just wrong.”
September 18th, 2006 at 2:52 pmSantorum is his own worst enemy. If he could just stop being himself then he wouldn’t have to spend tens of millions of dollars.
September 18th, 2006 at 2:54 pmBrett Lieberman, who writes for this newspaper from Washington, D.C., heard about the call and dialed in, even though neither he nor The Patriot-News fits the bill.
Santorum was on the line, decrying the controversy, accusing his political enemies of trying to weaken him while he runs “the top political race in the country.”
Then he said, “It’s sort of sad that they would use religion and this tragic time for purely partisan, blatantly political purposes.”
‘Cause, you know, Santorum would never do that.
Then, all of a sudden, Lieberman voiced a question.
“Senator,” he said, “what I’m hearing from a lot of victims’ groups …”
Santorum interrupted. “Is this Brett Lieberman?”
When Lieberman said yes, Santorum demanded to know what he was doing on a conference call for Catholic press.
“You’re not going to be on this call, and you’re not going to ask a question,” Santorum ordered.
September 18th, 2006 at 2:54 pm#20
Dick,
Either one…I just don’t believe that she believeds 90 percent of what she says. She is a provocateur — nothing more.
September 18th, 2006 at 2:55 pmYou could have saved a lot of wasted electrons by saying:
I don’t like Coulter. She is not a true conservative. She is a Neo-Con.
September 18th, 2006 at 2:56 pmHey, isn’t that breaking the Law of Prudery?
September 18th, 2006 at 3:00 pmDick, Either one…I just don’t believe that she believeds 90 percent of what she says. She is a provocateur — nothing more.
So Anne is a mouthpiece for the liberal media now?
And then Rush and Oreilly are as well?
And none of them are ‘true conservatives’?
Exley..dude. wtf.
September 18th, 2006 at 3:02 pmI wasn’t aware that anyone with a Leave it to Beaver haircut is capable of any profanity more offensive than “Golly-gee Whillakers!”
September 18th, 2006 at 3:07 pmI have no problem with homosexuality. I have a problem with homosexual acts.
I don’t agree with Santorum because he is using government to enforce his narrow religious belief.
This is prosyletizing thru law and has nothing to do with security of the country..and No, I am not homosexual..nor will this theocratic law ever stop Homosexuality. It’s a waste of time and is, to me, a wedge issue disguised as a ‘feel good’ hate law.
September 18th, 2006 at 3:13 pmWhat a Christian!!!
September 18th, 2006 at 3:16 pmWhat are ‘homosexual acts’?
Specifically, what distinguishes them from commonly practiced heterosexual acts?
September 18th, 2006 at 3:19 pmAnd so, the conservatives are falling off in droves and droves, recognizing that President Bush is in no way a true conservative, in no way is he a …
http://www.moderateindependent.com/v1i15conservatism.htm
Oh I see Exley, you guys finally figured out Bush was no true conservative…well hi diddly fiddly neighbor, you didn’t listen to all these dumb leftists way back when did you?
But Santorum is, since you approve of this article, I take it Exley a ‘True Conservative’?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NOV 16 - 30, 2003
VOL. 1 ISSUE 15
THE DEATH OF CONSERVATISM
The Destruction By The Neo-Cons Of All That Was Held Dear By Conservatives Has A Growing Number Joining The Ranks Of Independents
by Samuel A Stanson
November 30, 2003 – Here is an excerpt from a recent e-mail we received from a long-time conservative:
“Being (a) lifelong Tory approaching 70 yrs (I am) appalled to see conservative leaders mortgaging social infrastructure trying to balance annual budgets. Conservatives in (the) past were patriarchs until corrupted by political correctness.”
Many of you may not be familiar with the “Tory” label. The Conservative Party in great Britain was a successor to the earlier Tory party. In other words, this man is so conservative he even sticks with the tradition of calling conservatives Tories, which dates back centuries.
The term “conservative” is used by commentators such as Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity to describe themselves. It is used by Bush supporters to define themselves. But what really is conservatism, and why are so many true conservatives disgusted by this new breed of Bush/Limbaugh Republicans?
The Conservative Party in England is characterized by moderate progressivism. In other words, look at the quote from the gentleman above: he is “appalled to see conservative leaders mortgaging infrastructure to balance annual budgets.” That is not the, “Screw all social programs,” that we get from FOX News-brand “conservatives.” Exactly the opposite, actually. This gentleman, being a lifelong conservative, is dealing with actual conservatism, not the bastardized, dishonest form the neo-cons in America preach.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Well Exley, hate to say this, but we told you so..
September 18th, 2006 at 3:19 pmDick: “I have no problem with homosexuality. I have a problem with homosexual acts.” - - I don’t care for Broadway musicals either.
September 18th, 2006 at 3:26 pmOh boy, more fun Santorum stuff! He’d been too quiet of late. Good to have you back, Ricky!
September 18th, 2006 at 3:28 pmAmerica’s Least Wanted
Daddy’s a potty mouth.
-Fetus in a Jar
September 18th, 2006 at 3:33 pm“I have no problem with homosexuality. I have problems with homosexual acts.”
Personally, I can’t stand homosexual Deuteronomy. Homosexual Joshua, Judges and Ruth totally rule, though!
But seriously folks, doesn’t “Homosexual Leviticus” sound really kinky?
September 18th, 2006 at 3:43 pm#33 look up faggot in your leftard dictionary.
September 18th, 2006 at 3:48 pm#16 yeah I guess with YOUR spelling your really showed me! Typical ignorant leftard
Hey I have nothing against faggots- I think everyone should have one hanging in their front yard!
“I have no problem with homosexuality. I have problems with homosexual acts.†Personally, I can’t stand homosexual Deuteronomy. Homosexual Joshua, Judges and Ruth totally rule, though! But seriously folks, doesn’t “Homosexual Leviticus†sound really kinky? Comment by Dji
So funny it deserved an encore. ROTFLMAO!
September 18th, 2006 at 3:55 pmExley, You mentioned “ lower gasoline prices that have lessened public angst“. Tell me something. Do you believe that the lower gas prices we’re seeing now have anything at all to do with the factors that caused them to soar in the first place? In other words, has the tension over Iran lessened that much? Have the refineries been able suddenly to refine more gas? Have new sources of oil been found and tapped already thus increasing the supply? What’s the reason? Because if the fall in gas prices has nothing to do with why they rose in the first place, then I believe that price-gouging is a fair description. And no, it’s not “capitalism at work”. Unless you want to say that capitalism is immoral?
Why do you think that gasoline prices are falling? (And don’t say, “Who cares?” because I do.)
September 18th, 2006 at 3:55 pmYes, we should stop homofascism. So stophomofascism, lynchaliberal, and nullthis should all be hung from a fence in their front yards, preferably by their teeny little manhoods.
September 18th, 2006 at 4:01 pm#39 I looked up Faggot in my dictionary and this is what i got…
fagot
Main Entry: 1fag·ot
Variant(s): or fag·got /’fa-g&t/
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English fagot, from Anglo-French
: BUNDLE: as a : a bundle of sticks b : a bundle of pieces of wrought iron to be shaped by rolling or hammering at high temperature
So what is your point and how does this definition tie into your ignorance?
September 18th, 2006 at 4:01 pmWell look who’s back.
“stophomofascism”
Get back in your closet little boy. When you finally decide to come out for real, then you can talk about homosexuality. You can tell us all about it sweetheart.
September 18th, 2006 at 4:07 pmMark
September 18th, 2006 at 4:16 pmAnd what were those bundles of sticks used for? To start fires, as in burning at the stake. So when homosexuals are called “faggots”, the person is calling for the death of someone on the basis of their genetically determined sexual orientation. Disgusting in America!
It’s disgusting that the only way the Repubicans can be united is in their hatred of a minority group. But then again there’s no low that Republicans won’t sink to. Clue to Republicans: It didn’t work for the Nazis and it won’t work for Republicans.
September 18th, 2006 at 4:17 pmPennsyltucky Politics offers more details.
September 18th, 2006 at 4:24 pm
Santorum shows his Sanatorium Side.
September 18th, 2006 at 4:26 pmPoor guy, has to put up with free speech.
Poor guy, has to say yes as Rove shovels money at him.
Bush is establishing a solution.
Send all reporters to Bush’s new GULAG.
September 18th, 2006 at 4:27 pm
In these times, “faggot” is not used if somebody is really a homosexual. Mostly used instead of calling somebody stupid or a loser, e.g., poster stophomofascism.
Ralph: Chris hasn’t been answering his phone.
John: Yeah, he is probably hanging out with those other guys that’s why.
Ralph: He is such a faggot.
John: Yeah him and his faggot friends.
Figures a “conservative” would be way behind on that social interaction curve.
September 18th, 2006 at 4:27 pmIt’s funny how these born again types quickly lose their cool when pressured. Then they cry and beg forgiveness on TV at their mega church and its right back to sophomoric, hypocritical Christianism to appease the American Taliban. No wonder he’s gonna lose. God Bless Ann Richards
September 18th, 2006 at 4:27 pmDifference between Nazis and Republicans: Nazis killed Jews, Republicans support Jewish right for homeland, in spite of Democrat efforts.
September 18th, 2006 at 4:29 pmSure Steve…..
September 18th, 2006 at 4:39 pm#53, very interesting. How does that tie into Santorum being an unhinged nut job? And please do detail these democrat efforts to stop the jews from having a homeland. And describe why they deserve land they had not occupied for over 1000 years?
September 18th, 2006 at 4:39 pmMark you idiot…why do Americans deserve land they have not occupied for 1000 years? Your comparison is lacking, asshole.
September 18th, 2006 at 4:48 pmIs Homophobia Associated With Homosexual Arousal?
Interesting article. I think some of our posters may even find it enlightening.
September 18th, 2006 at 5:05 pmSantorium is a curse!
September 18th, 2006 at 5:11 pmFrothy Mix gets all frothy at the mouth. Hilarious.
September 18th, 2006 at 5:12 pmCome on, Ricky. Beg for it. I want you to come on TV and beg for our votes. The macho lying isn’t working anymore, looks like all that’s left is eating a brown baby birthed by a single mother in less than 15 seconds so Fox News can make a good sound bite out of it.
Because we all know you want that 10% hate-vote THAT bad, Ricky. So come on. Show us how you REALLY feel.
September 18th, 2006 at 5:19 pmWhy don’t we let God decide? If he truly meant for Israel to be a home land ante up with the splitting seas, plagues of locusts, Avenging Angels!!! Or, we could do waht Democrats have done and will do, work towards Peace and Justice by listening and working with all of those involved not just the ones that figure they have a right to do as they please. Seriously, can you look over there and say things have gotten better since the Republicans took power? Do you really think WASPy Republican Christian/Concervatives give a shit about Israel or Jews? Seriously, think about it sometime.
September 18th, 2006 at 5:25 pmPetulant spoiled brat. He can’t defend himself, so he flies off the handle at the reporter.
September 18th, 2006 at 5:33 pmJust like George Bush — he can’t take the heat, even when he deserves every bit of criticism.
I was there when we helped set the Jews free. Believe me (I Moses for God’s sake) Republicans walk the talk!
September 18th, 2006 at 5:40 pmYou would curse, too, if you were an honest guy who loved his country and was trying to do the right thing and liberal reporters (posing as having objectivity) were constantly lying about you in hopes of promoting their own political agenda.
September 18th, 2006 at 5:53 pm#65 Steve,
Oh, really? Could you cite some specific examples of where “liberal reporters were lying about [Santorum] in hopes of promoting their own political agenda”? Were they well-known and widely-read liberal reporters (if they do exist)? Or were they unknown bloggers that nobody would have ever heard about if not for someone making their blog nationally known? (I would disagree with the “honest guy” part, too.)
September 18th, 2006 at 6:00 pmOMG, that’s hilarious #65!
If Santorum didn’t open his mouth so much and say such STUPID things, reporters wouldn’t have so much fun with him. He has foot in mouth disease.
September 18th, 2006 at 6:06 pmSteve: “You would curse, too, if you were an honest guy who loved his country…” - - Your basic premise falls apart when you characterize
September 18th, 2006 at 6:07 pmRicK-Street Santorum as an “honest” guy.
Who gives this idiot money in the first place….
September 18th, 2006 at 6:08 pmYou would curse, too, if you were an honest guy who loved his country and was trying to do the right thing and liberal reporters (posing as having objectivity) were constantly lying about you in hopes of promoting their own political agenda.
Comment by Steve — September 18, 2006 @ 5:53 pm
The “K Street Project,” which was led by conservative activist Grover Norquist and then-House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas, was an effort to press Washington’s lobbying firms and trade associations to hire Republicans who share their agenda. It gets its name from the street where many of the firms are based.
Democrat have criticized the project as an attempt to funnel millions of dollars in lobbying money to the GOP.
Since he became the Senate’s third-ranking Republican in 2001, Mr. Santorum has held weekly meetings with top Republican lobbyists at which he discusses, among other matters, job openings at Washington lobbying firms.
AN HONEST GUY? ARE YOU FRICKIN KIDDIN?
September 18th, 2006 at 6:22 pm#65 Steve,
The Perp Walk that is…
September 18th, 2006 at 6:23 pmExcuse me…that should ave been #64.
September 18th, 2006 at 6:25 pmSen. Santorum is mentally ill and unbalanced too! He should resign ASAP and NOT run for re-election! He hates Gays, and has other issues that are disgusting, so he must be removed from the Senate!
September 18th, 2006 at 6:33 pmSantorum is far from an honest guy.
September 18th, 2006 at 7:03 pmThe term “liberal press” is passe` now since it has been so widely revealed that the press has given Bush&Co a free pass - and failed to challenge (ask for proof of) anything declared as factual by the White House.
Ya’ll just upset at Santorum cause he won’t let you homos get “married†. po little faggots
Comment by poorlittlehomo — September 18, 2006 @ 7:02 pm
No I’m upset because he brings his spontaneous miscarriage home for his kids to play with which I believe qualifies as child abuse and behaviour way the hell too freaky for the man to be loose on the streets.
September 18th, 2006 at 7:33 pmHey bones,
Don’t be hatin’
September 18th, 2006 at 7:55 pmHey bones,
Don’t be hatin’
Comment by Fetus in a Jar — September 18, 2006 @ 7:55
Actually I have the greatest sympathy for the fetus because it had to go home with Rick Santorum. Poor, poor fetus.
September 18th, 2006 at 8:01 pmHeh.
September 18th, 2006 at 8:16 pmRick Santorum receives campaign money from Delti Communications - the porno channel.
September 18th, 2006 at 9:15 pm“I mean, you have people who don’t heed those warnings and then put people at risk as a result of not heeding those warnings. There may be a need to look at tougher penalties on those who decide to ride it out and understand that there are consequences to not leaving.” –Sen. Rick Santorum on Katrina situation (R-PA), Sept. 6, 2005
What can you say? He’s a compassionate conservative genius just like the rest of ‘em.
September 18th, 2006 at 9:22 pmHere’s a nifty photo - Santorum, Bush’s Monica Lewinsky
September 18th, 2006 at 9:29 pmhttp://flickr.com/photos/btezra/115035083/
I wish I could blow bubbles…..
September 18th, 2006 at 9:32 pmThis is the real Rick Santorum and how he votes against the American people and for big money. Read it an weep…
http://www.ontheissues.org/Senate/Rick_Santorum.htm
Only a someone that hates America would vote for Rick Santorum.
September 18th, 2006 at 9:39 pmCome on folks. You know Exley loves it when Lance grops one in his tighty whitey.
September 18th, 2006 at 9:50 pmThis is fun! First Bush implodes in front of the press then Sanatarium has a melt down. Who’s Next?
September 18th, 2006 at 11:00 pmWho’s Next?
Comment by Republicans Are The Fear And Smear Party
What ever you do people, do not go hunting with “Dick” Cheney…
September 18th, 2006 at 11:17 pmIf the ‘Righties’ are so ’strong’, as they are constantly telling us they are, I don’t see why they are so terrified by Homosexuals, and homosexuality in general. In fact it seems as though they are afraid of all kinds of things. They seem to think that if they can just pass enough laws against everything that frightens them, we will somehow be safe from it all. But they themselves have shown us over and over again, that laws don’t matter, if they get in the way of ‘keeping America safe’, by their way of thinking, that is. They will just change them, after the fact, to make the illegal, legal, and calling us traitors for speaking out. If their motives were so ‘pure’ they wouldn’t need to sneak around and lie about it, even after they are caught ‘RED’ handed. I’m tired of having a bunch of people who are afraid of their own shadows run our country into the ground. Come on November!
September 19th, 2006 at 3:24 amRick Santorum exemplifies what sucks about America.
September 19th, 2006 at 10:34 pm