Apparently you you ultra-lefties muct have been out to lunch when Clinton used a similar tool to jar the concience of the American public when you got just as boisterous, and agitated and denied having sexual contact with Monica Lewinski, or where you out having a reich moment?

There was not breach of journalistic protocol in asking Mr. Clinton question asked by viewers about his lack of involvement in pursuing Al Queda, it was a just question to ask. Consindering that “nutter” diatribe we all got an earfull from Keith Obermann, who truly is suited better for JV games, more than anything. Hypocrit — want to say Mary Mapes was in the bounds of journalistic “integrity”… or do you want to bend with the reeds on that? Admit it… the NIE report and the ABC special didn’t err on your side of what you would try to call reality. What they released of the NIE was intentionally exerpted… and misread. But I would expect nothing more the the left. Look.. the left cannot make a point without blatantly misrepresenting the material facts, and for you rebel bastard’s… we call that lying. The Iraq efforts are [now.. thank God] far more effective than we hoped. Hamid Karzi put some you you lefty reporters in line when he spoke of the net effects of having American stay there and allow for the safe establishment of a representative for of goverment to be established… Hmmm; seems to me you’d be better off not blogging and maybe investing in you time into the development of “sit and spins” for adult refuters of reality. Either that or stop watching the Matrix…

-That Darn Republican

Also FYI, I don’t know if anybody heard of YES program, Youth for Exchange Study. This is an exchange program by the government in which foreign high school students come here for FREE (fare, insurance, you name it) with monthly stipend with the purpose of educating American (in general) or raise awareness re: Islam. Say, for example from Indonesia, if they have 100 students and say USA spend $5,000 for each of these students, it’ll cost us $500,000 per year, multiply that by how many countries, that’s a lot of money. We are hosting a student right now. I really believe it for a good cause. But thinking that it’s our tax dollar that pay for it – I always tell our student, you are lucky and try to learn as much as you can (about life in general).

Any comments on this?

But to convince anybody with more than one brain cell, you’ve got to do better than just calling Clinton’s fiscal triumph a “lie.” The real lie is saying they robbed Social Security. Unfortunately, you’ve apparently been victimized by Karl Rove’s talking points, and that has caused you to mistake William J. Clinton for George W. Bush, the real robber of the Social Security national trust fund.

You “definitely don’t trust the government,” but by quoting so credulously from, you show that you do trust that reich-wing fascist propaganda sheet masquerading as a legitimate newspaper — USA Today! Bwahahahaha! Whatta hoot!

And, incidentally, have I ever got a deal for you! Prime Pacific-ocean-front property in northeastern Nebraska!

Cheap!

“The Clinton administration reported a surplus of $559 billion in its final four budget years. The audited numbers showed a deficit of $484 billion.”

Why? Because the federal accounting guidelines (which would be VERY illegal for any corporation in America to use) basically ignore such things as retirement benefits for civil servants and military retirees.

Basically, this country hasn’t run a true budget surplus since before the Depression, and anybody that tries to tell you any differently is either ignorant of fact or blowing smoke.

Okay, the rant’s over, carry on.

I think your comment is insightful, except for one minor point.

We have an all-volunteer force in Iraq and no draft. Therefore, Bush’s daughters are no different in this respect, if they had been sons. And Bush’s putative son, assuming he’s born in 2007, will be 18 years old in 2025. Let’s suppose we’re still at war in Iraq in 2025. This is a distinct possibility unless America — including Hillary and the rest of the pro-war Democrats in Congress — wakes up and smells the coffee.

Now, it’s 2025, and Bush’s son enlists? How likely is this scenario?

And you indirectly blaming Clinton for 9/11 , grow up buddy! Ask yourself, if you were Clinton what would you have done? And if you’re Bush what will you do? Will you be dealing it the way he’s dealing it now? Think about it very carefully.

Lastly, I really wish Bush has a son because I don’t think he will attack Iraq as much he’s attacking them now. I would really love to see a headline – “GWB’s SON FIGHTING IN IRAQ” – That will be very interesting!

He was getting a hummer for 8 years – we had a “Peace dividend” that he cashed in. 9/11 happens – our troops are streamlined, why? Who was running things for 8 years prior to 9/11.

Or did the bad guys wait and pull all this off in the mere 9 months that Bush took over.

Wake up people, pull your heads out of your ass and smell the coffee

He was gonna send ‘em in COVERED WAGONS, you idiot!

Yeah Clinton did lied about that relationship…who don’t. He is just human afraid to be busted by his wife. Any man would lied to save the marriage…(beside its private life)…leave it. Unlike Prez BUSH….lied about pretty mush everything since elected doubted the first election is even truth!!! think about it stevie. WAR in IRAQ haha you kidding me right……sound a bit like Vietnam war….Bin Laden still not capture the main person that causes 9/11, Uss Cole among others…NOT Saddam. In Fact OBL don’t even like Saddam….WAR in Iraq is about OIL!!!! More for Texaco or the Bush family.. Good on B. Clinton to expose FOX and Wallace on air…now thats the truth.

What sucks and is void of common sense and integrity is your statement.

Both parties have intelligent, good, and honest people of integrity in them. And both parties have dummies, bad folks, and dishonest people in them. You need to take a university-level course in socio-political science, retardsandwich. Most Americans, wherever they may be, are good and decent people. As St. Paul wrote, “For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places” (Ephesians 6:12).

Fox is more than just right-leaning. Fox is far-right-leaning, close to fascist. And it is just as obvious that all other other (MSM) networks are not left-leaning at all. Their not even middle-of-the-road. They right right-leaning, CNN, for instance, who tried to get Rush “Sieg Heil” Limbaugh on board (I’ll bet you don’t remember that). Bottom line: the MSM are following Fox into fascism just as fast as their goose-stepping jackboots will take them.

Let’s look carefully at an important part of the interview:

Clinton asked wallace if Fox “news” asked the same tough questions of Bush’s administration’s officials the two dozen or so times they were on the show.

Wallace answers with something like “you don’t watch Foxnews do you?”
Clinton keeps asking “did you?” “did you?” “Tell the truth”

Wallace is now busted…. he cannot say yes because that would be a flat out lie. Apparantly Clinton did his homework or guessed perfectly correctly. Either way he is a damn genius, and was well prepared for the little fox game. I bet they won’t be f’ing with him any more. Maybe Bush has lulled them into thinking all presidents are stupid. Most are not. One certainly is, and it is not the GREAT William Jefferson Clinton!

Mr. Clinton is hated by fools and morons because he makes them become uncomfortably aware that they are fools and morons. Ignorant people hate intelligent people. That’s why we have Bush as “president”…. the ignorant finally got “their” president (twice). We cannot let this happen again… EVER!

When I joined the military in 1975 I swore to defend America from all enemies foreign and domestic. So… I will do all I can to defeat the Reptilian party until I die, and then my children and grand kids will take over. Hopefully, the republicans will go the way of the Taliban.

Ignorance and fear are the tools of evil. Take your country back from the bloodthirsty, racist, ignorant, selfish, hateful, fearful, dangerous (to humanity and the Earth) reptilian party. Peace…

Could anyone be serious when they ask why Bush is not asked any of the same type questions as Clinton in this interview? Dems have asked the same questions with the same “smirks” for the last 7 years. And yes, he answers like a typical politician ( but dumber). Both presidents have been involved in major contraversies and both opposing parties have started the same rumors and conspiracy theories to discredit the other. The only difference being the mentally challenged left actually believes their conspiracies.

Both parties suck and are void of common sense and integrity.

Don’t blame you.

NOW, Clinton gets upset for being blamed for 9/11, when ALL of the evidence says Bush and his criminal clowns totally ignored terrorism for the first 8 months of his “presidency”, caring more about making rich people richer at the expense of everyone else.

And THAT’s what these superficial morons will pretend to care about in the next two elections… whether a guy can keep his cool and never raise his voice, or get angry when lied about to his face….

But wait! If a guy is that cool… he’s “wooden”… remember Al Gore?
Trying to satisfy (R)eptiles is truly maddening…. maybe that’s the plan…