Think Progress

EXCLUSIVE: HUD Secretary Admitted Professional ‘Bias’ Against Bush Critics, Ignored Warnings From Lawyers

Alphonso Jackson An investigation by the Department of Housing and Urban Development Inspector General reportedly revealed that HUD Secretary Alphonso Jackson instructed staff to award HUD contracts to President Bush’s political allies and withhold them from his political opponents. The HUD IG, however, has refused to make the full 340-page report public.

ThinkProgress — which has previously published the executive summary — has obtained access to the entire report. Testimony from Jackson, his top deputies, and HUD legal counsel, none of which has previously been reported, show that the agency set aside the rules, assisted its political allies, and made life difficult for its political opponents. Here are some key excerpts:

1. Against the advice of HUD legal counsel, Jackson regularly met with potential HUD contractors. From page 110 of the report:

Regarding JACKSON’s involvement with contracting matters, [former Acting HUD General Counsel Kathleen] Koch advised JACKSON would meet with individuals who were either contractors or who wanted to obtain contracts at HUD. Koch stated, “We warned him against it.” Koch and her staff used to review the daily schedule for the previous HUD Secretary, Mel Martinez, to advise if there were potential problems, but that practice “just petered out” after JACKSON became Secretary. When potential HUD contractors wanted to meet with Martinez, they would be kept away from Martinez…

On page 156 of the report, Jackson himself admits regularly meeting with potential contractors:

JACKSON acknowledged that he does meet with individuals seeking contracts with HUD, stating “I’ve met with a lot of them…They come over to me…I say to them sure, we’d love to do business with you…”

2. Jackson explicitly acknowledged that he would not assist people who are critical of President Bush. From page 153:

[W]ell my position is if you’re going to castigate me, castigate our President, I’m not going to sit here and lie to you, I’m not going out of the way to call Norm Mineta and say see Officer Medici and make sure that he does X-Y-Z. I’m not going to do it. I will not do it, and I’m not going to say that I will…So I’m not going to go out of my way to help somebody who’s castigating the President…Now, if that’s my bias, I have it.

3. Jackson’s deputies attempted to circumvent competition rules to secure a contract for a Republican PR firm. From page 216:

Cathy MacFarlane, Assistant Secretary, Public Affairs, acknowledged requesting a contract for Spaeth Communications. Spaeth had done previous public relations work for MacFarlane, Baylor and JACKSON, as well as various Republican-affiliated organizations, cited in the contract application documentation. The contract was initially to be awarded under the “Unusual and Compelling Urgency Exemption to the Competition in Contracting Act.”

The request for the extraordinary procedures was blocked by Associate Counsel John Opitz. He elaborated on the Spaeth contract on page 218:

There is a “facial” concern in Spaeth’s references to her firm’s prior politically related work. In retrospect, it does raise questions. Was the award based on her ability to do work or her prior connections, including her connection to JACKSON? I do not know the answer to that.

The HUD IG report also documents that Jackson obstructed a contract for Abt Associates because they supported Democrats, according to Jackson’s Chief of Staff. Nevertheless, throughout the report Jackson repeatedly denies that he has ever improperly influenced any HUD contract.

Sen. Frank Lautenberg, Rep. Henry Waxman and Rep. John Olver have all called on Secretary Jackson to resign.

Digg It!



35 Responses to “EXCLUSIVE: HUD Secretary Admitted Professional ‘Bias’ Against Bush Critics, Ignored Warnings From Lawyers”

  1. Karim says:

    When you’re a Republican, regardless of race, the only color that matters is green.


  2. pinson says:


  3. Zimzone says:

    Birds of a feather…


  4. wisedup says:

    what he is saying is: ‘Bush likes me…so screw laws’. aaaaa…when does his trial start?…..


  5. Chris H. says:

    I’m just shocked to see that members of the administration acted criminally…


  6. Joe D. says:

    If there had been even a hint of something like this during the Clinton Adminstration, David Broder and his cronies would be on this like stink on crap. Since it involves a repuke, regardless of his color, its a non story. IOKIYAAR.


  7. Clyde+the+Rippe says:

    Waxman should be introducing an Impeachment bill instead of blowing smoke. If the crooked SOB were going to resign he would never have accepted the position in the first place. Another Cheney salute to Congress.


  8. GOPigs! says:

    [Socrates] Now, if there be any sort – of good which is distinct from knowledge, virtue may be that good; but if knowledge embraces all good, then we shall be right in think in that virtue is knowledge?
    [Meno] True.
    [Socrates] And virtue makes us good?
    [Meno] Yes.
    [Socrates] And if we are good, then we are profitable; for all good things are profitable?
    [Meno] Yes.
    [Socrates] Then virtue is profitable?
    [Meno] That is the only inference.
    [Socrates] Then now let us see what are the things which severally profit us. Health and strength, and beauty and wealth – these, and the like of these, we call profitable?
    [Meno] True.
    [Socrates] And yet these things may also sometimes do us harm: would you not think so?
    [Meno] Yes.
    [Socrates] And what is the guiding principle which makes them profitable or the reverse? Are they not profitable when they are rightly used, and hurtful when they are not rightly used?

    The Virtueless Neo-Cons…


  9. katy says:

    did YOU call yet? …is there still time? …worth a try…

    We still have a chance to stop one of the most egregious features of the Detainee/Torture bill. Please contact your Senators and tell them to support Patrick Leahy and Arlen Specter’s ammendment to restore habeas corpus rights, allowing suspects at the very least an opportunity to challenge their detainment in court. Senators Collins and Snowe, both moderate Republicans, need a bit of a push on this:
    capital switchboard: 866.340.9281 .or. 866.808.0065
    …
    if they won’t vote against the torture bill, this is the best to hope for…
    …


  10. ruskindoc says:

    This thug needs to be in jail!



  11. ardee says:

    What does it take to get FIRED from a Government job? Sign me up so I can be totally incompetent and make $$$$$$


  12. Jay Randal says:

    Jackson must be forced to resign his position, plus he is a disgrace to Black Americans > shame on him!


  13. barfly says:

    Another legacy of the Reagan administration: take a program or agency that actually does some good – and turn it into a crony-enrichment program. It’s republican judo.


  14. Bruce+Gorton says:

    Jay Randal

    No he isn’t a disgrace to black Americans. He is a disgrace to Americans, and honest public servants. That he doesn’t seem to have realised that what he was doing was wrong, means that he is also a disgrace to stupid people.

    Lets not be the wing that brings race into this issue.


  15. Republicans: Putting food on your family says:

    Isn’t this the same as Jackson giving Bush a blow job? I hear impeachment coming! Yippeee!


  16. joe+cantwell says:

    this is a crime, why hasn’t he been arrested?


  17. War4Sale says:

    The GOP believes in equal opportunity corruption.


  18. Will OBGYN for Food says:

    How’s that filibuster coming along, ThinkProgress?


  19. Tobey+Tall says:

    PS did anybody notice this bit ??????
    House Approves Bill on Detainees

    It would bar military commissions from considering testimony obtained through interrogation techniques that involve “cruel, unusual or inhumane treatment or punishment,” which is proscribed by the 5th, 8th and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution. But the bar would be retroactive only to Dec. 30, 2005, when Congress adopted the Detainee Treatment Act, sponsored by Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), to protect CIA operatives from being prosecuted over interrogation tactics used before then.


  20. Wayne A. Schneider says:

    Why should we believe that this Department is the only one where this kind of thing went on? Is it entirely “unacceptable to think” that Secretary Jackson was not the only cabinet secretary to do this with contracts? I would like assurances from the other Department IGs that this isn’t happening to their departments, too. And no, the president’s word isn’t good enough.


  21. Jakester says:

    and these hypocrits still have the nerve to lecture us on morals cause they don’t believe in evolution and are against abortion!


  22. Ronin_Tetsuro says:

    “Gee. I guess since everyone knows, I’d better come clean huh? I did it and I’m really really sorry.”

    Ask for resignations. Push for impeachment. Clean the White House.


  23. Jakester says:

    obviously he is a liberal mole planted by the great leftist-enviro-communist-jihading conspiracy to further weaken humble, honest Bush.
    /off limbothink


  24. Republicans are the fear and smear party says:

    Jackson, you’re doing a heck of a job.


  25. paul says:

    this isn’t a story.


  26. WaltTheMan says:

    You’re right, Paul, it’s fact.


  27. budpaul says:

    Quick, somebody get that guy a medal from Congress or something! He’s doing a heckuva job.
    America’s Least Wanted


  28. David+B says:

    OK, does someone remove him from office or are laws which have been broken meaningless because they are not enforced.


  29. Darryl says:

    Hey Jay Randal (#15)

    Yeah, when I see a Black Republican I think it’s like looking at a Jewish Nazi… What have the Republicans done to help blacks in the past century?

    NOW… please… please… please would one of the Reptilian trolls attempt to dispute this. So I can show that whatever they did to pretend to help Blacks actually helped the white (R)eptiles. Please!


  30. JPark says:

    Oh, Paul, it isn’t a story? Did Rush tell you that?


  31. RobW says:

    Corruption in HUD contracts? Imagine that!

    Doesn’t anyone here watch The Sopranos? They did this episode years ago.


  32. Oh+Please says:

    THE SLIME KEEPS OOZING OUT OF THE FLOORBOARDS.


  33. Jim Senter says:

    Hey People
    why don’t you do your patriotic duty and put the PDF out here where we all can see it. Don’t play the bastards’ game. Let us see and make up our own minds.



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll