Oh..you only pile on when it is a conservative who falters.

You Simple minded twits! See You All in November in the back of the bus!

These guys are scum. They act so pristine when caught in a cover-up when all the while they are covering up their dirty little secrets in hopes that nobody catches them in the Act.

Once found out, they stand at the mic and proclaim they will get to the bottom of things… Then they go to work creating partisan commissions to hide what they can and distort the rest.

This morning on ABC, top White House aide Dan Bartlett praised the House leadership’s handling of the Foley scandal as “very aggressive,”

Very aggressive is an understatement and not what this investigation needs. A honest non-partisan probe needs to be shoved up their behinds and examined through a microscope turning them inside out to get to the bottom of this corruption.

On a day when children are being assassinated in Amish schools, we hear pages in congress, (young children,) are being exposed to pedophiles and their handlers on capital hill. This is as low as it gets.

Hastert should resign. He stands there and says we need to find out who knew about this when all along he did! He was lying to the American people.

I wonder what Bush knew because if Hassert knew you can bet your bottom dollar Bush, Chaney, Rice, Rumsfeld and Rove, (especially Rove) knew. That by any definition is a cover-up. High crimes in any book.

Enough is enough.

These Republicans sicken me.

A question that needs to be repeated over and over: “What if it was your kid?”

Don’t let this thing die. This is the equivalent of letting a alligator baby sit. you know he is going to bite. A pedophile chairing the missing and exploited children dpt you know he’s going to try and F a child.

See: http://www.themoderatevoice.com/posts/1159730867.shtml

UPDATE: Also: On July 27, 2006, the NRCC, which Reynolds chairs, accepted an unusually large contribution of $100,000 from Foley. Hard to imagine something of that size just slipping past the chairman.

Of course, there could be an explanation (and we are sure we will hear one) for this — but this story is going to go on for a while.

BWAAAHAHAAAHAAHAHHAAAAAHAHAHAAAAA~!

“CongressMEN” is the correct sppppellling.

John

How many have actually read the e-mails? I was not only appalled at the subject matter, but equally appalled at Mark Foley’s grammatical mistakes. Foley refers to the boy’s “BULDGE.” Bulge is misssssspellllllllled.

OBVIOUSLY, MARK FOLEY IS HOOKED ON PHALLUSES MORE THAN HE’S HOOKED ON PHONICS.

It should be noted that, as a congressional representative, Mark Foley has had little interest in the huge escalating deficit. Don’t you think that as a well-respected, trusted politician he should have been crunching deficit NUMBERS quite a bit? I think so! Obviously, again, deficit NUMBERS weren’t floating around in his pea-sized brain.

However, the boy’s penis size NUMBER was floating around in his pea-sized brain. No wonder we have such a huge deficit. Homosexual Republicans are focusing on the wrong NUMBERS. Darn! Darn! No wonder Jeff Gannon is such a good, fabulous friend to many Republicans in p-o-s-i-t-i-o-n-s of power.

It’s also interesting to note that Mark Foley has been voted as one of the best-dressed congressman. Let’s get real folks!!! I didn’t know that being in your “birthday suit” classifies as being well-dressed. Where do these homosexual Republicans HANG OUT? They must HANG OUT at nudist colonies.

When Mark Foley returns to Florida, I suggest he consult, Neil Bush. Neil Bush can spruce up not only Foley’s questionable writing skills, but his questionable morals as well. We’re counting on you, Neil. Thanks, Neil.

John

What is amazing to me is that I’ve yet to hear anyone descibe the instant messaging for what is was…Foley was cybersexing with the boy. Foley was getting his rocks off chatting in the IM about masterbation. I guess no one wants to say it was cybersex because of the picture that begins to form in ones mind.

The link below speaks volumes about whether there was an attempt to keep the scandal about Rep. Mark Foley and a teenage male page under wraps:

The White House is …

Hastert requests criminal probe of Foley

AP – 9 minutes ago…

To Bartlett-get ready for an independent prosecutor.
To Newt-Republicans never worry about offending “gays.”

IOKIYAN!!

It’s okay if your a Neo-Con pervert or pedophile or drug addict or even a plagiarist!

Limabugh [drug addict hypocrite] is OK!,
O’Reilly [falafel pervert] is OK!,
Anne Coulter [Plagiarist is OK!,
Condi Rice [mushroom cloud] is OK!,
Foley, [pedophile] is OK!,
Cunningham [corruption] is OK!,
Abramoff [corruption] is OK!,
Safavian [corruption] is Ok!,
Ney [drunk corrupt] is OK!,

We do not need an investigation, Ok?

NEY WAY!!