Clinton commuted the sentence of Reynolds who was CONVICTED of sleeping with a minor campaign worker. He was later hired by Jesse Jackson. No inquiry as to what Clinton got from Jackson for that stunt, no inquiry into Barney Frank or Stubbs.

Liberals apparently have a double standard when it comes to child rapists. As long as they’re democrats, it’s ok.

Having said that, the Dems are not decrying this Republican coverup loudly enough to (1) maximum political damage to the G.O.P. and (2) compensate for the hits their own party will take when other ex-pages comes forward.

Read: “The fake morality of conservatives“

In determining the believability of any witness and the weight to be given the testimony of any witness, you may properly consider the demeanor of the witness while testifying; the frankness or lack of frankness of the witness; the intelligence of the witness; any interest the witness may have in the outcome of the case; the means and opportunity the witness had to know the facts about which the witness testified; the ability of the witness to remember the matters about which the witness testified; and the reasonableness of the testimony of the witness, considered in the light of all the evidence in the case and in the light of your own experience and common sense.

Republicans keep your dirty hands of children!

A different, though still possibly overlapping, segment of the population will be familiar with another sense of the phrase chicken hawk: A gay man who prefers adolescent sexual partners. (This term has also been used for a straight man who seeks adolescent girls.)

Chickenhawks hang around bus stations and train depots, looking for runaways who want to “make it in the big city.” They are either molesters, or their proxies – older, more experienced ho’s, who don’t mind making a few bucks if someone else does the dirtywork. Just like republicans.

For a paid troll, this one ain’t giving ‘em their money’s worth.

*yawn*

Dems from 1969, 1983, or 1997 aren’t facing an election here. The news is that right now, this year, YOUR self-proclaimed family values folks swept a homosexual child trawler under the rug, hoping to keep the issue quiet until after the election.

… and here’s the Rhodes Scholar LAF’s response:

what?!!! hahaha!!!

so no Democrat is up for election in November 2006?!!

hahaha…oh my goodness just when liberal stupidity couldn’t get any worst.

hahahaha!!!!!

I’ll try to write slower so you can read it this time:
Dems from 1969, 1983, or 1997 aren’t facing an election here.

Got it? Or is it too tough for you to handle. Maybe you are the one with “immense ignorant.”

The point, which you tried to ignore, is that right now, this year, YOUR self-proclaimed family values folks swept a homosexual child trawler under the rug, hoping to keep the issue quiet until after the election.

LAF, go crawl back under a rock until you can read.