Comments on: North Korea’s Atomic March http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/ Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:13:56 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: tinfoilhatpolice http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/comment-page-3/#comment-1818951 tinfoilhatpolice Tue, 20 Feb 2007 01:25:07 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/#comment-1818951 Nice intelligent comments here, especially the last few. I hope you all get your wish and when Hillary is president the world will be awash in happy fluffy pink bunnies and all evil in the world will have been vanquished. Sheez... Nice intelligent comments here, especially the last few. I hope you all get your wish and when Hillary is president the world will be awash in happy fluffy pink bunnies and all evil in the world will have been vanquished. Sheez…

]]> By: joe http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/comment-page-3/#comment-1613561 joe Fri, 02 Feb 2007 17:09:11 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/#comment-1613561 bush needs to go and suck a dick bush needs to go and suck a dick

]]> By: Sam http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/comment-page-3/#comment-1613556 Sam Fri, 02 Feb 2007 17:08:13 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/#comment-1613556 Bush needs to go and suck a dick Bush needs to go and suck a dick

]]> By: Sam http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/comment-page-3/#comment-1613547 Sam Fri, 02 Feb 2007 17:07:02 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/#comment-1613547 Bush is a stupid <strong>Mother Fu**** </strong>and needs to stop these <strong>Sh**</strong>with what ever he is doing Bush is a stupid Mother Fu**** and needs to stop these Sh**with what ever he is doing

]]> By: fishpond http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/comment-page-3/#comment-1047068 fishpond Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:38:59 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/#comment-1047068 "Seems the differences in policy are evident. I can see both sides. I prefer Clinton’s approach, but was it merely just putting off the inevidable? I’m not sure on that one either. What would you do as the President? Sounds like a reeeaaallly hard job. Bush’s “zero tolerance” approach will only enflame the situation. " You know what I would prefer? Swedens approach. STAY the F out of OTHER countries. Hey it's been working for us, like 200 years now? No. Dont even go blackops:ing in other countries. Bad boy! No blackopsing! Why the f do YOU need to police the world when the rest of us dont? It's defenitely not cause we CANT. Germany and France are pretty well "endowed" too you know, to just mention two. “Seems the differences in policy are evident. I can see both sides. I prefer Clinton’s approach, but was it merely just putting off the inevidable? I’m not sure on that one either. What would you do as the President? Sounds like a reeeaaallly hard job.

Bush’s “zero tolerance” approach will only enflame the situation. ”

You know what I would prefer? Swedens approach. STAY the F out of OTHER countries. Hey it’s been working for us, like 200 years now?

No. Dont even go blackops:ing in other countries. Bad boy! No blackopsing!

Why the f do YOU need to police the world when the rest of us dont? It’s defenitely not cause we CANT. Germany and France are pretty well “endowed” too you know, to just mention two.

]]> By: Flip http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/comment-page-3/#comment-1028833 Flip Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:13:17 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/#comment-1028833 #93 What has GWB done in the last 6 years to benefit the common folk of our nation? And please don't say 'we haven't been attacked since 9-11 so he is strong on national security'. I know Bush lovers like to use that to put him on a pedestal, but what they fail to remember, Bush WAS president on 9-11 and ignored every sign of security intelligence about there being an attack within the US. The government failed us on 9-11. And now there is a hostile take over of our political system. The prez makes his own laws, nullifying the other 2 branches of our government, while the other 2 branches of our government allow it to happen. "We are at war" so We The People are expected to allow the president to mold the whole future of our nation with no check or balance. It's called a power grab and we are setting ourselves up for a single branch of government 'dictatorship'. It is happening people, while we sit idly by. I hate partisan politics and believe 95% of all politicians are scum bags but we have no choice but to vote democrat across the board in the midterm (I never thought I would say that!). This rubberstamp, president knows best, spineless bunch we have in our congress and senate needs to go! Otherwise, prepare for more of your freedoms to vanish, while your phones are tapped, you’ll be logging onto your computer with your National Security Card while your ISP hands all of your internet activity to the government, you’ll be labeled as an enemy of the state for posting your opinions on websites like this, be imprisoned indefinitely with no trial. All of this, because your government failed you and is now fearing you to believe it's for your own protection. Nah, that could never happen….. About NK, enough finger pointing, NK is responsible for testing nukes. The last 5 presidents failed, some just did a little more than others. #93
What has GWB done in the last 6 years to benefit the common folk of our nation? And please don’t say ‘we haven’t been attacked since 9-11 so he is strong on national security’. I know Bush lovers like to use that to put him on a pedestal, but what they fail to remember, Bush WAS president on 9-11 and ignored every sign of security intelligence about there being an attack within the US. The government failed us on 9-11. And now there is a hostile take over of our political system. The prez makes his own laws, nullifying the other 2 branches of our government, while the other 2 branches of our government allow it to happen. “We are at war” so We The People are expected to allow the president to mold the whole future of our nation with no check or balance. It’s called a power grab and we are setting ourselves up for a single branch of government ‘dictatorship’. It is happening people, while we sit idly by. I hate partisan politics and believe 95% of all politicians are scum bags but we have no choice but to vote democrat across the board in the midterm (I never thought I would say that!). This rubberstamp, president knows best, spineless bunch we have in our congress and senate needs to go! Otherwise, prepare for more of your freedoms to vanish, while your phones are tapped, you’ll be logging onto your computer with your National Security Card while your ISP hands all of your internet activity to the government, you’ll be labeled as an enemy of the state for posting your opinions on websites like this, be imprisoned indefinitely with no trial. All of this, because your government failed you and is now fearing you to believe it’s for your own protection. Nah, that could never happen…..

About NK, enough finger pointing, NK is responsible for testing nukes. The last 5 presidents failed, some just did a little more than others.

]]> By: Think Progress » REPORT: Bush Officials Were ‘Rooting’ For North Korea to Test Nuclear Weapon http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/comment-page-3/#comment-1019833 Think Progress » REPORT: Bush Officials Were ‘Rooting’ For North Korea to Test Nuclear Weapon Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:21:38 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/#comment-1019833 [...] A factual timeline of the North Korean program traces how policies of containment and engagement slowed and stopped the program, while threats of regime change increased the dangers. The two key failures were the choice to focus on overthrowing the government in Pyongyang rather than stopping the nuclear program, and the invasion of Iraq which distracted U.S. attention from the real nuclear dangers and propelled both North Korea and Iran to accelerate their programs. [...] [...] A factual timeline of the North Korean program traces how policies of containment and engagement slowed and stopped the program, while threats of regime change increased the dangers. The two key failures were the choice to focus on overthrowing the government in Pyongyang rather than stopping the nuclear program, and the invasion of Iraq which distracted U.S. attention from the real nuclear dangers and propelled both North Korea and Iran to accelerate their programs. [...]

]]> By: daffy duck http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/comment-page-3/#comment-1011724 daffy duck Fri, 20 Oct 2006 22:11:17 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/#comment-1011724 I think i just read about the two failed nuclear weapons they had, me and my brother think they had some poor tw*t hitting it with a hammer.. go off u stupid piece of **** I think i just read about the two failed nuclear weapons they had, me and my brother think they had some poor tw*t hitting it with a hammer..

go off u stupid piece of ****

]]> By: Brandon http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/comment-page-3/#comment-1006700 Brandon Thu, 19 Oct 2006 15:43:19 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/#comment-1006700 If we don't do anything now then we aren't going to doing anything when there "TESTING" Missles and shoting them in every direction. We had a problem with N.Korea since 1960's and NOW we want to do something about it. While were in Iraq there underground coming up with a "target" to shoot at next. So what if Japan and S. Korea don't like them, ARE THEY DOING ANYTHING ABOUT IT! Farther more, if Japan, S. Korea, and U.S. "goverment" don't come as one and do something about this we are all good as dead because the N.Korea President reminds me of another Hitler but yet he ain't burning people, his nuking people! If we don’t do anything now then we aren’t going to doing anything when there “TESTING” Missles and shoting them in every direction. We had a problem with N.Korea since 1960’s and NOW we want to do something about it. While were in Iraq there underground coming up with a “target” to shoot at next. So what if Japan and S. Korea don’t like them, ARE THEY DOING ANYTHING ABOUT IT! Farther more, if Japan, S. Korea, and U.S. “goverment” don’t come as one and do something about this we are all good as dead because the N.Korea President reminds me of another Hitler but yet he ain’t burning people, his nuking people!

]]> By: cecy http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/comment-page-3/#comment-998056 cecy Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:13:22 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/#comment-998056 <strong>Iagree with comment 98 we do have to think of some solutions to solve this problem because it is up to us the future generations to deal with this problem since a big crisis is going to occur in our country that weall really dont want to happen.</strong> Iagree with comment 98 we do have to think of some solutions to solve this problem because it is up to us the future generations to deal with this problem since a big crisis is going to occur in our country that weall really dont want to happen.

]]> By: N. Korea’s Nuclear March-- The End of The Republic http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/comment-page-3/#comment-994304 N. Korea’s Nuclear March-- The End of The Republic Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:58:15 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/#comment-994304 [...] ThinkProgress.org [...] [...] ThinkProgress.org [...]

]]> By: Reality High Radio » Reality High Radio Oct 12 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/comment-page-3/#comment-982949 Reality High Radio » Reality High Radio Oct 12 Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:57:51 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/#comment-982949 [...] North Korea (a timeline) Foley (not a timeline) [...] [...] North Korea (a timeline) Foley (not a timeline) [...]

]]> By: Ol'Rivers http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/comment-page-2/#comment-980862 Ol'Rivers Thu, 12 Oct 2006 08:38:05 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/#comment-980862 "Clinton gave away nuclear technology...." Ding!! Sorry Jeffy (aka SFB), wrong, try again. “Clinton gave away nuclear technology….”
Ding!! Sorry Jeffy (aka SFB), wrong, try again.

]]> By: Jeff http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/comment-page-2/#comment-980405 Jeff Thu, 12 Oct 2006 03:35:49 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/#comment-980405 W. goes into Iraq, his opposition complain that he did it ALONE (even thought the Brits, Aussies, Poland, and several other countries were part of the coalition). He gets hammered for going at it alone. He deals with N. Korea as a party of six nations. He gets hammered for not going at it alone. Let China and Japan worry about him. We have a mess to clean up in the middle east. Bill Clinton gave away nuclear technology to a mad man. His Secretary of Defense (not Bush's) found Kim cheating on his agreement. He CONTINUED TO PURSUE NUKES DURING CLINTON'S TERM. Clinton tried to make him go away, he abused the trust. Bush did the right thing. Bribing thugs doesn't work. When are you people going to realize that evil people do exist and they don't respond to negotiations or rational thought? W. goes into Iraq, his opposition complain that he did it ALONE (even thought the Brits, Aussies, Poland, and several other countries were part of the coalition). He gets hammered for going at it alone.

He deals with N. Korea as a party of six nations. He gets hammered for not going at it alone. Let China and Japan worry about him. We have a mess to clean up in the middle east.

Bill Clinton gave away nuclear technology to a mad man. His Secretary of Defense (not Bush’s) found Kim cheating on his agreement. He CONTINUED TO PURSUE NUKES DURING CLINTON’S TERM. Clinton tried to make him go away, he abused the trust. Bush did the right thing.

Bribing thugs doesn’t work. When are you people going to realize that evil people do exist and they don’t respond to negotiations or rational thought?

]]> By: unbelievable http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/comment-page-2/#comment-978649 unbelievable Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:42:35 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/#comment-978649 <em>why don’t people instead focus their anger into something USEFUL, like thinking up possible solutions to the problem instead of playing the name calling game. Comment by Tony — October 10, 2006 @ 6:40 pm</em> I did Tony. I suggested Bush do what Clinton was doing - send diplomats to visit Kim regularly. That's all he wants - attention. Why don't YOU make some suggestions instead of whining about people exercizing their First Amendment Rights... My guess is that you don't have any. why don’t people instead focus their anger into something USEFUL, like thinking up possible solutions to the problem instead of playing the name calling game.
Comment by Tony — October 10, 2006 @ 6:40 pm

I did Tony. I suggested Bush do what Clinton was doing – send diplomats to visit Kim regularly. That’s all he wants – attention.

Why don’t YOU make some suggestions instead of whining about people exercizing their First Amendment Rights… My guess is that you don’t have any.

]]> By: Lynn Anderson http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/comment-page-2/#comment-978442 Lynn Anderson Wed, 11 Oct 2006 17:40:00 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/#comment-978442 I certainly agree with Comment #2 that paying Albright should come out of President Bush's own pocket. I often think that many of the problems we have should be paid out of his own pocket because they are the result of his own doing. I certainly agree with Comment #2 that paying Albright should come out of President Bush’s own pocket. I often think that many of the problems we have should be paid out of his own pocket because they are the result of his own doing.

]]> By: Think Progress » After Blaming Clinton For North Korea Nuke, McCain Blasts People ‘Engaging In Finger-Pointing’ http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/comment-page-2/#comment-978243 Think Progress » After Blaming Clinton For North Korea Nuke, McCain Blasts People ‘Engaging In Finger-Pointing’ Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:55:36 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/#comment-978243 [...] For the record, here is a timeline of North Korea’s nuclear weapons development. A cheat sheet: Bush I: 1-2 bombs worth of plutonium Clinton: Zero plutonium Bush II: 10-11 bombs worth of plutonium and counting, first nuclear test [...] [...] For the record, here is a timeline of North Korea’s nuclear weapons development. A cheat sheet: Bush I: 1-2 bombs worth of plutonium Clinton: Zero plutonium Bush II: 10-11 bombs worth of plutonium and counting, first nuclear test [...]

]]> By: cecy http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/comment-page-2/#comment-977786 cecy Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:14:33 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/#comment-977786 <strong>I think George W. Bush should be worried more about what is going on in north Korea that building worthless walls across the border and sustaining a war thar is helping..WHO? May I ask. long ago before the elections, many people had the GWB initials in their forehead..where are they now? It is definite that hard times await us and nobody is more guilty than the people who re-elected little momas boy. Oh and besides who is going to do the hard work here in the U.S, since you see many homeless AMERICANS and no MEXICAN HOMELESS...get a job!!!! If I have had the opportunity to vote I would have never choosen Bush a corrupt monster taking over the White house and the U.S. since Im not 18.</strong> I think George W. Bush should be worried more about what is going on in north Korea that building worthless walls across the border and sustaining a war thar is helping..WHO? May I ask. long ago before the elections, many people had the GWB initials in their forehead..where are they now? It is definite that hard times await us and nobody is more guilty than the people who re-elected little momas boy. Oh and besides who is going to do the hard work here in the U.S, since you see many homeless AMERICANS and no MEXICAN HOMELESS…get a job!!!! If I have had the opportunity to vote I would have never choosen Bush a corrupt monster taking over the White house and the U.S. since Im not 18.

]]> By: Bloated Plutocrats » Blog Archive » Tuesday night lazyblogging http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/comment-page-2/#comment-974953 Bloated Plutocrats » Blog Archive » Tuesday night lazyblogging Wed, 11 Oct 2006 00:01:20 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/#comment-974953 [...] And I'll only add, check out Think Progress' timeline on the Korea Problem. While you're there, notice that McCain is flat-out lying. Specifically: 1994: Clinton Administration reaches Agreed Framework, North Korea freezes nuclear production for the next eight years. [Link] [...] [...] And I'll only add, check out Think Progress' timeline on the Korea Problem. While you're there, notice that McCain is flat-out lying. Specifically: 1994: Clinton Administration reaches Agreed Framework, North Korea freezes nuclear production for the next eight years. [Link] [...]

]]> By: Tony http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/comment-page-2/#comment-974544 Tony Tue, 10 Oct 2006 22:40:33 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/07/nk-timeline/#comment-974544 I have noticed quite a trend in the posts here....basically paste in some headlines from god knows where (with VERY few actually providing a source for said info), then, proceed to call President Bush a bunch of names (signifying that you have no actual point other than you don't like Bush). I am a PROUD supporter of President Bush, yet I am open enough to see why some people don't care for him, BUT instead of thinking up crafty slander, why don't people instead focus their anger into something USEFUL, like thinking up possible solutions to the problem instead of playing the name calling game. I have noticed quite a trend in the posts here….basically paste in some headlines from god knows where (with VERY few actually providing a source for said info), then, proceed to call President Bush a bunch of names (signifying that you have no actual point other than you don’t like Bush). I am a PROUD supporter of President Bush, yet I am open enough to see why some people don’t care for him, BUT instead of thinking up crafty slander, why don’t people instead focus their anger into something USEFUL, like thinking up possible solutions to the problem instead of playing the name calling game.

]]>