I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

Your blog makes very interesting reading. I’m sure others will think so too I look forward to reading their comments.

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

This enables authors to keep track of who is linking to, or referring to their articles.A Trackback is one of three types of Linkbacks,

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

I’m sorry you missed my post on the Foley Scandal upthread. And since this thread is about the Foley story v. NK Nukes, your mention of “…mounting evidence that the current path is facilitating an increasing level of danger” is just a tad off-thread.

Indeed, my post was responsive a post made by someone else who had quoted Dick Cheney. In responding to my post, you could have suggested that it was off-topic from the original thread, but you did not. Too late to do so now. You seem to be trying to master the art of politicians, which is to move the target as soon as the sharpshooter has you dead in his sights. Unfortunately, your moves are transparent to anyone who is observant, and you remain an easy target. I will not allow you to slither away so easily.

You have now been invited three times to respond with meaningful dialog regarding my original point. You have had ample opportunity to address my original criticism of the Cheney quote, and each time you have refused, relying only on continued insipid insult that is apropos of nothing. One can only conclude that you have nothing of value to contribute to the discussion.

The backtrail of this dialog is available for anyone to read who might care to do so, and thus your vapid nature speaks eloquently for itself.

I have no desire to continue to slap you silly. Since at this point it is unlikely anyone is reading this thread, you may as well move on and hurl your pathologic abuse and broken logic on more current threads, where no doubt you will continue to be deconstructed and humiliated in front of all onlookers.

Again, I know you think you’re the smartest cub in the den, but it is not a great accomplishment to out-maneuver the masses on an an “opposition” blog site. Trolls don’t have to adhere to any sort of rationality or rules to accomplish their disruption, therefore taking on that role doesn’t prove your abilities. On the contrary. If you sincerely want to prove the efficacy of your positions, then debate them with honesty and integrity. If you can’t win on the merits, or at least achieve a draw, save your dignity by not devolving into nonsensical diversions and logical fallacies.

What you need to do is to understand your limitations and not pick battles with people who can show you up as a fool. Best to walk away from a hornet rather than continue to get stung. Better luck attacking your next victim.

********My dear Gorn, If, and when you decide that your feelings are not facts, we MAY get a bit further in our “discussion”. YOU have NO clue what I think (I’m beginning to wonder about your intellectual elitists who think they know everything at all times. Of course, it’s been proven how factually incorrect you can be.) When you associate my name with the word “penis” please understand that I am awestruck by your Dr. Seuss-like ability to rhyme….really, I am…

“Your evident penis envy…”
*********You’re a sophomoric idiot (from the Greek word ‘idiotis’). You give the term “adversary” a very bad name. Or as judges are wont to rule “Irrelevant!”….”Sustained”….

“You think you are clever, but you are not.”
*********THAAAT will came as a huge surprise to the people I work with – - they not only think I am fairly clever, but quite humourous as well. But obviously you KNOW SO MUCH more than everyone in your circle of one.

“Your banter is ineffectual and your reasoning is based on logical fallacies and self contradictions.”
**********You keep cracking that Logic textbook, maybe some will sink in through osmosis….

“I can engage you in meaningful debate,…”
**********So YOU say…..I’ve been waiting …and have yet to see the flicker of genius from you.

I’m sorry you missed my post on the Foley Scandal upthread. And since this thread is about the Foley story v. NK Nukes, your mention of “…mounting evidence that the current path is facilitating an increasing level of danger” is just a tad off-thread. Revise that outline and go see your teacher….

“Will you take the chance to act in a mature manner, or will you follow your previous drivel?”
*********YOU are SOOOO right!! I never realized HOW mature it was to call someone “Venus with a Penis”. When my little Mini-Aphrodite starts flinging that compliment around I’ll be sure to tell him, “Son, only the MOST mature people in the world, discussing the most mature and deep topics, are allowed to use that gender affirming noun. Mom has that from a reliable source….”

Hate to hit and run – but this is such a target rich environment….

False. This is exactly and clearly what you did. Your non-sequiter about Foley is another desperate reach to explain your behavior and has nothing to do with anything that had been said before. Your evident penis envy and Foley’s penis lust are (so far as I know) unrelated topics, and your belated attempt to equate them is gratuitous and self-serving.

Even up to now, you have never addressed the original point of the thread. Instead, you chose only to create a series of content-free personal attacks on someone with whom you had never communicated before.

You think you are clever, but you are not. Your banter is ineffectual and your reasoning is based on logical fallacies and self contradictions.

I can engage you in meaningful debate, but if you are to have credibility, you must cease nonsense attacks and go back to the original point.

To wit: there has never been an attack comparable to 911 either before or since, so pointing to the fact that there has been none since is a poor indicator of proof that the current regime is “making us safe” as implied by the quote of Dick Cheney. Certainly it is not intelligent to make voting decisions on that basis, amid mounting evidence that the current path is facilitating an increasing level of danger for American interests around the world.

There, now you have another chance to try to say something meaningful and to the point. Will you take the chance to act in a mature manner, or will you follow your previous drivel?

So the word “penis” to you is equated to “porn”, “filthy”, and “dirty”.

You seem to have many, many issues to deal with. May I suggest psychotherapy, VP?

**********Dear Gorn of Porn – - I’m sure your mother is very proud that her child is able to manuver the world of computers – such a clever kid!! But trust me, Mom is NOT happy about your filthy “fingers” (as opposed to verbalization with a “dirty mouth”) – a bar of Palmolive may be in your future. I assured her it was something some kids outgrow……

Now go sit in “time-out”….

Perhaps Mighty Aphrodite should consider a name change to “Venus with a Penis”…

Thank you.

“- until you reverted to typical 7 year old behaviour and started pointing the finger of blame to administrations before and after President Clinton”

Can’t get away from the ad hominem stuff, can ya? Too bad. You are also again intentionally missing the point. I was using the same “blame the previous administration” tactic that is part of the current Republican talking points, although in the case of WTC I it is an easier case to make.

“Particularly disturbing was your discounting the 6 killed”

I did nothing of the kind. Shame on you. I pointed out that it was a tragedy I overlooked. Clearly it is not on the scale of 911, and none of your twisting can change that fact, however plainly it was a tragedy. I overlooked it because of the scale differential. That’s a factual admission, not “discounting”.

“Your reading seems extremely selective. 20/20 hindsight for Repubs is just as laser straight as Dems. I have never blamed President Clinton for 9/11.”

I never accused you of blaming President Clinton for 911. Your reading seems extremely selective. Oh, the irony. I said that Republicans blame Clinton, and I can assure you that many do, and publicly. I don’t know if you do or not. In fact, I know little about you other than the evident fact that you have an enormous ego and self-image.

“P.S. Smarmy doesn’t bother me – but you seemed to shoot first and ask questions later”

Pot, meet kettle. Kettle, meet pot.

Really, MA, you aren’t nearly the clever wit that you seem to think you are. Please try to apply what wit you have to responding to the original point, rather than your digressions.

Failing that, I’ll give you a topic to discuss. Mighty Aphrodite is neither mighty nor Aphrodite. Discuss.