Unwilling To Investigate Bush Administration, Congress Returns To Clinton
Unwilling To Investigate Bush Administration, Congress Returns To Clinton
A group of conservative lawmakers, led by Armed Services Committee Chairman Duncan Hunter (R-CA) and Judiciary Committee Chairman James Sensenbrenner (R-WI), called on House Government Reform Committee Chairman Tom Davis (R-VA) to once again investigate former National Security Adviser Sandy Berger’s handling of classified documents.
For a Congress that has conducted “only minimal oversight” of the Bush administration, the move to investigate a former Clinton administration official long out of office is both misplaced and a waste of time. In a letter objecting to the investigation, Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) wrote:
The Berger incident is not new, and there is no conceivable standard under which it would be considered a vitally important national security matter. As you know, the Justice Department thoroughly investigated the incident in 2004, and Mr. Berger pled guilty in April 2005 to a misdemeanor charge of taking classified documents without authorization. At the time of Mr. Berger’s please, Noel Hillman, the chief of the Justice Department’s public integrity section, said Berger “did not have an intent to hide any of the content of the documents.”
Instead of pursuing a politically-motivated, dead-end investigation, here are some legitimate national security issues over which Congress should be exercising its oversight:
– The release of an intelligence estimate that paints a “grim” picture of the situation in Iraq which is being suppressed by the Bush administration
– The White House’s role in manipulating intelligence about Iraq through their pre-war public statements
– The National Security Agency’s warrantless wiretapping program
– The complicity of senior administration officials in the torture and mistreatment of detainees
Mother Jones has some ideas for other investigations Congress should pursue. Also see the Carpetbagger Report.
Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date
Hell yeah, Clinton is the skapegoat for everything. He still has power 5 years after being in office. All this blaming just gives Clinton power he does not have.
And Exley is a whore too.
October 12th, 2006 at 1:44 pmThe Right wing want to give the allusion that Dems are as criminal and corrupt as Republicans. This dog won’t hunt.
October 12th, 2006 at 1:46 pmIf you can’t yell louder, then deflect attention. It seems to work. Bread and circuses all around.
October 12th, 2006 at 1:46 pmYou can understand why Hunter and Sensenbrenner don’t want to investigate the Bush administration’s handling of these documents…
October 12th, 2006 at 1:46 pmThey must really be running scared. How about we start with an investigation about the lies that got us into Iraq?
October 12th, 2006 at 1:48 pmHunter ?!?!? - He’s going down along with the Dukester - I’d think he’d want to keep a lower profile than all that.
Moreover - take this as further proof (as if any were needed) that THERE IS NO LOW THAT THE GOP WILL NOT STOOP TO. NO LIE THEY WILL NOT TELL.
October 12th, 2006 at 1:49 pmGeez, are these losers ever desperate.
October 12th, 2006 at 1:51 pmThe crimial shoved top secret documents down his pants and it was said that
“did not have an intent to hide any of the content of the documents.â€
Did not hide the content!!!! He shoved them down his pants! How stupid is this. If you or I did this we would be in federal prison.
Oh, but this DummycRAT site will make a bunch of excuses and say only Republicans are criminal right? If this was a Republican you people would ask for him to be put to death!..Admit it you double-standard hypocrits!
October 12th, 2006 at 1:53 pmrepublicans think they’ll win this election by running against Clinton so they must keep his name in the news.
October 12th, 2006 at 1:54 pmGOP loves to smear former members of President Clinton’s administration! Republicans have nothing valid to run on, for November election, so smears and lies are their only means to try to retain power in DC!
October 12th, 2006 at 1:54 pm#8…are you referring to Fawn Hall or Ollie North?
October 12th, 2006 at 1:56 pm[…] Original post by Faiz Read More… […]
October 12th, 2006 at 1:56 pmHappy Guy hates homosexuals but defends the predatory behavior of Rpe. Foley. Nothing he says should be taken seriously.
October 12th, 2006 at 1:58 pmSandy Berger never put any documents in his pants or socks - yet another BIG LIE from the Right Wing. Fools hear this crap and repeat forever - thinking if you say it enough it will become a fact.
http://mediamatters.org/items/200501130011
Now why don’t they go do something important like investigate Clinton’s XMAS cards list with 160 hours of SWORN testimony? This lousy Republican congress already did that.
October 12th, 2006 at 1:58 pmHappy Guy was also a troll that was supporting Foley the child molester and defending the GOP coverup of his molesting of MINOR boys.
Happy Guy, you have no credibility here. Pedophile enablers are frowned opon in these here parts.
October 12th, 2006 at 2:04 pmTom Baker:
Hunter is trying to throw red meat to his wingnut constituents to distract from his own “house troubles.” In this district, he’s have to be caught running Mexicans across the border to lose re-election - but he might have to decide to “spend more time with his family” if the Union Tribune investigation uncovers exactly how he was able to purchase his house, and get federal funding to rebuild after the fires. It seems he lied about the square footage of the dwelling in order to pay less in property taxes, but when he had to file for funds to re-build after the fires, he gave a larger number than he attested to on his tax forms. The Union Tribune got hold of copies of both forms, and now he’s ducking them. Ironic, that the editorial board of the Union Tribune endorsed both him and Cunningham as being “ethical”before their reporters uncovered the truth.
October 12th, 2006 at 2:05 pmHappy Guy hates homosexuals but defends the predatory behavior of Rpe. Foley. Nothing he says should be taken seriously.
Ouch. Happy dude, that had to hurt!
October 12th, 2006 at 2:06 pmTypical CONservatives (hence the name): Always Blame Clinton. Always change the subject. Always provide cover for their king. Always power over people. Let’s hear ya Kool-Aid swillers…why is it more important to investigate people out of office nearly six years than to investigate ANYTHING on our current fascist regime?
October 12th, 2006 at 2:09 pmIf this was a Republican you people would ask for him to be put to death!..Admit it you double-standard hypocrits!
Comment by Happy+Guy
Ok, I’ll admit it, Guy. But being out of office will work just as well. Happy now?
BTY, you need to change your name. I have not seen a “Happy Guy” on the right since Bill Clinton was finally impeached following a 5 year witch hunt that cost the taxpayers 40 million dollars to find out that even a president can get a blowjob now and then.
Wouldn’t it be something if the democrats would return the favor after the election next month? But of course they won’t as they will be too busy overturning the damage junior has caused the past 6 years.
October 12th, 2006 at 2:12 pmbarfly - thanks for the Hunter rundown - i knew he had his tit in a wringer already - sounds like it’s both of’em.
if happy guy had any brains, he’d be dangerous. as it stands, he just a funny man.
October 12th, 2006 at 2:12 pmFrom CNN.com’s archives:
Funny that the archive staff members did nothing to stop Mr. Berger from leaving the building, nor did they follow him outside and stop him, to make sure he wasn’t removing sensitive documents. They simply let him go.
How convenient.
October 12th, 2006 at 2:13 pmthink you will find that each of these guys is:
October 12th, 2006 at 2:15 pmA. losing in their attempt to be re elected
B. losing in their attempt not to be incarcerated
I think Thomas Jefferson was our first Democrat….so…will republicans go to his grave and dig him up and lynch him…..as it’s ALL HIS FAULT…..these (bad) republicans are really,really desperate. It’s coming to a close for them and they know it.
October 12th, 2006 at 2:15 pmSo Berger gives a television interview on Tuesday criticizing the misadminstration’s policies on North Korea and the next day, 10 repugs feel it’s time to look into a 2 year old closed/settled case….. Déjà vu All Over Again…..
October 12th, 2006 at 2:16 pmvindictiveness, retribution, these are the values we hold dearest….
October 12th, 2006 at 2:24 pmBrain Dead
October 11, 2006
The article “McCain blames Clinton on Korea†in the Press Democrat newspaper unveils Sen. John McCain true intention against the former president Clinton’s North Korea’s foreign policy: A shot at the Oval Office. This makes McCain a big fat liar. His assertions that Clinton only provided warnings against North Korea’s nuclear buildup went nowhere. Well, here are some facts that McCain purposely overlooked: when North Korea tried to make more plutonium during the Clinton Presidency, Clinton threaten war and the Koreans back down, freezing their nuclear program and putting a stop to their missile testing. McCain also failed to add how President Bush walked away from dealing with North Korea while Colin Powell try to continue the process begun under Clinton which Bush crushed. At the beginning of his presidency Bush detected that North Korea was trying to start a uranium program and he took this opportunity not to talk to them and label them as one of the “Axis of Evil.†And what North Koreans did? They thumbed their noses at Bush as they threw out the IAEA and withdrew from the Non-Proliferation Treaty. That hug McCain gave Bush in 2004 must have short-circuited his brain.
October 12th, 2006 at 2:25 pmDéjà vu All Over Again…..
Comment by peterh — October 12, 2006 @ 2:16 pm
Will there be props, like Hunter’s last Gitmo rationalization? Will he hold up a pair of mangy socks, and crusty underwear as proof?
October 12th, 2006 at 2:27 pmIf you think there have been enough investigations into the Clinton administration and maybe, six years in, congress should provide oversight for the Bush administration, vote for the democrat next month. It’s as simple as that.
October 12th, 2006 at 2:29 pm[…] WANTED (by Congress) DEAD OR ALIVE: SANDY BERGER. […]
October 12th, 2006 at 2:30 pmWhat do you expect from the two biggest horse’s asses in Congress? Intelligence? Efficiency? Common sense? HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!
October 12th, 2006 at 2:32 pmWhat do you expect from the two biggest horse’s asses in Congress?
Did someone mention ass? Where do I get some?
October 12th, 2006 at 2:34 pmCongress isn’t concerned with doing anything other than serving the political interests of the majority.
Show me ANY evidence to the contrary and I’ll amend that statement.
October 12th, 2006 at 2:40 pmBuh-buh-but it’s CLINTON’S FAULT!
(This standard assignation of blame is provided as a free courtesy for all the rightwing wingnuts that post here so you can now spare us all your bullsh*t. No thanks are necessary.)
October 12th, 2006 at 2:40 pmOh God! Why even bother wasting time with this sh*t? Why arn’t Democrats going postal over this stuff?
October 12th, 2006 at 2:41 pmLooks like Dunky Hunter isn’t the only area republican with “house troubles.”
From the San Diego Democrats:
We’ve recently heard reports that the San Diego District Attorney’s Office has impaneled a Grand Jury to investigate our complaint.
The Democratic Party had asked whether Bilbray’s sworn claims of multiple primary residences amounted to perjury or voter fraud. If our concerns are substantiated, it would appear that Bilbray broke the law in the very district whose past representative is now in federal prison for betraying the public’s trust.
{snip}
Our original letter to the San Diego District Attorney (5/17/06) refers to Bilbray’s signed voter registration — days after the Cunningham story broke — declaring a Carlsbad address to be his “residence and domicile” under penalty of perjury (6/21/05).
Less than two months after re-registering, he signed a new deed of trust for his home in Alexandria, Virginia (8/25/05). He did not indicate that the home was anything other than his “principal residence,” which the deed would have explicitly forbidden.
In December of 2005, Bilbray’s children testified under oath that they lived in Virginia with their father. The context was a lawsuit in which Bilbray claimed his children were out-of-state residents who deserved to pay the same tuition as undocumented immigrants who lived in-state. A few months later, he signed a formal declaration of candidacy to run for Congress (2/23/06), citing his mother’s house on Unicornio Street in Carlsbad as his residence.
Throughout this entire period, he was receiving a homeowner’s tax exemption on his property in South County’s Imperial Beach, where neighbors had spotted him in the community ever since he began to run for the North County seat
October 12th, 2006 at 2:51 pmYeti - I totally agree - last time the DNC called me for $, I told them I’d give them $1,000 the day all the Dems in the Senate walked out in protest - I think with enough contingent $ on the table, they might do it, but what does that say for the “pay to play” thing about DC that we all hate? I write my Senators and Congressfolk pretty regularly pleading with them to actually fight - - don’t know what it will take, or what else to do, but I’m sure as hell not going to let assholes like the GOP’ers do anything in peace, as long as I’m kickin’.
October 12th, 2006 at 2:54 pmThis was already investigated, right? How bout we investigate what happened with the Teapot Dome scandal? What is the point of this?
October 12th, 2006 at 2:55 pm39 - Right on! I mean, if I wanted people who don’t do anything but screw this country up, I’d vote for a Republican. If I wanted a sissy in office I’d vote for Nader. All the Democrats do is take blows, they never fight back. In recent weeks all I ever hear is “Clinton did this, let’s all blame Clinton.”, I never hear anyone in Congress rebuke any of it.
October 12th, 2006 at 3:00 pmdesperation, once again… they’ll soon be calling for an investigation of how Bill Clinton’s knowledge of Foley’s follies caused North Korea to launch the 9/11 attacks…
October 12th, 2006 at 3:01 pmRepublican Playbook
Rule #1: Blame Clinton
Rule #2: Blame Gays
Rule #3: Bring up Chappaquiddick
Rule #4: Scream 9/11 and run.
If needed repeat again.
October 12th, 2006 at 3:08 pmIt’s clear this country has gone BACKWARDS…..but pretending that Clinton is still President is a new one on me!
October 12th, 2006 at 3:12 pmI’m sure this will get MSM coverage, why? Well because the MSM is liberal of course. If there is anyone who doubts the right wing control of the MSM just watch this story take on a life of its own, and somehow become more important than our soldiers dying in Iraq.
October 12th, 2006 at 3:12 pmDesperate people do desperate things….even paint themselves as fools attempting to shift blame to someone who is no longer President. There’s no fool like an old, haggard, pervert-enabling GOP Fool, I guess???
October 12th, 2006 at 3:13 pmTry to get your story right TP…..from breitbart a few days ago:
Berger admitted last year that he deliberately took classified documents out of the National Archives in 2003 and destroyed some of them at his office. He pleaded guilty in federal court to one charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material and was fined $50,000.
Ten lawmakers led by House Armed Services Chairman Duncan Hunter, R- Calif., and Judiciary Chairman James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., released a letter calling for the House Government Reform Committee to investigate.
They asked the committee to determine whether any documents were missing from Clinton administration terrorism records, to review security measures for classified documents and to seek testimony from Berger.
Hunter’s spokesman, Joe Kasper, said the Justice Department had asked Congress to hold off on any oversight until the legal case concluded.
“It’s important that the House conduct its own review to ensure there is a clear understanding of the facts, and sensitive and highly classified security information is not potentially compromised in the future,” Kasper said.
Berger’s lawyer, Lanny Breuer, did not immediately return a call for comment. A spokesman for the Government Reform Committee said the panel was reviewing the letter.
At issue is a strange sequence of events in which Berger admitted to sneaking classified documents out of the National Archives in his suit, later destroying some of them and then lying about it. The Bush administration disclosed the investigation in July 2004, just days before the Sept. 11 commission issued its final report.
October 12th, 2006 at 3:14 pmHappy Guy = clown.
George Bush = clown.
Dick Cheney = clown.
Dennis Hastert = clown.
Citizen Dad = clown.
Karl Rove = clown.
John McCain = clown.
Donald Rumsfeld = clown.
Mark Foley = Happy Guy.
Notice the simple pattern?
October 12th, 2006 at 3:17 pmThis crap is “Old News”….passe bullcrap….it’s clear that the GOP is crumbling before our very eyes. The fact that they have nothing positive to spin and, instead, have to dredge up the past in order to have anything at all to say relevant to anything going on….is pretty pathetic and shows what an abysmal failure they’ve become. They’ve become an humiliation to the american people.
Pervert-protecting sycophants…..all of them - and will be finished up come November…….then onto ‘08!
October 12th, 2006 at 3:20 pmAbsolutely NOTHING they can do now to turn the tide of revulsion against the GOP as they continue their pervert-protecting methods( as well as Dumbya’s vote of confidence for Hastert..anyday Denny will be receiving Bush’s “medal of honor” for his outstanding leadership, eh????)
Each day they do so (and Hastert, Alexander, Boehner, et all) remain in office, their reputation disintegrates a bit more….soon there will be only a Repug exoskeleton- of- a- party left….maybe just in time for Halloween?? How apropos!!
October 12th, 2006 at 3:23 pmYou know, George W. Bush could eat a Jewish baby, and some c***sucker Republican in Congress would be like “What didn’t Bill Clinton do to stop him?”
October 12th, 2006 at 3:29 pmYeah, hey it was really nothing….TP twisting the truth again.
On two separate occasions, in September and October 2003, Sandy Berger took a total of five copies of a classified report from the National Archives. The document, an “after-action memo” written by Richard Clarke, was about the failed “Millennium plot” to blow up part of the Los Angeles International Airport during December 1999.
Berger destroyed three copies by cutting them up with scissors. He kept the other two copies, but returned these after being contacted by the Archives. Staff at the Archives had been monitoring an unusual pattern of activity during Berger’s visits and (the Washington Post reports one source as saying) had “specially coded the papers to more easily tell whether some disappeared,” after noting some had previously gone missing.
October 12th, 2006 at 3:34 pmAnd let’s not forget this key part……..ah, TP leaving out more key facts. TP is so honest.
After the plea deal was announced, the NY Post reported that the probe “seems to have shifted to whether Clinton appointees at the Archives tried to cover for Berger. Archives chief John Carlin, a Clinton appointee, was bounced soon after the incident. It’s a violation of law to take classified documents, so Archives staffers should have called the FBI when they saw Berger do it - instead, they called Clinton’s Mr. Fix-it, lawyer Bruce Lindsey.”
October 12th, 2006 at 3:36 pmHey Ben - what were those documents - were they the comprehensive anti-terror strategy that Condi says she never saw? Were they the 9/11 attack plans? were they Foley’s emails? or Abramoff’s? or Rove’s? what are you driving at, and how could you believe it’s relevant to anything at all that’s happening right now. Face it - you’re aligned with crooks, whose lies make all other lies seem trivial - whose crimes make the crimes of others seem forgiveable. Liars and Losers hoodwinked you with a not-really-so-good marketing campaign, you bought it hook line and sinker, and now that the jig’s up, you and some other pathetic suckers will be left holding the bag. How’s that feel? Hopefully, the President’s “common-sense tax cuts” have made you rich beyond your dreams, cause you’re gonna need that $ badly in the years to come, when the rest of the GOP shitbirds come one home to roost.
October 12th, 2006 at 3:46 pm#55…nice smackdown. He will from here on out be known as Ben the Bitchslapped Baby.
October 12th, 2006 at 4:07 pmBlying - How would you know stupid? He admitted he destroyed them. So why did he destroy them? Hmmmm
robg - impressive…..guys using the word “bitchslapped”…uh are the ones who are the bitches.
Tommy Boy…the story here was about Berger….ironically TP does a story and you do exactly what they are writing about.
TP ALWAYS leaves out the facts.
October 12th, 2006 at 4:16 pmSo Ben, you admit that you have no idea what the documents were, or how they might be relavant to anything in the year 2006. You just wanted to stir up some ruckus, cause you’re a daring and intrepid individualist, engaged in a noble mission of truth-seeking, right?
October 12th, 2006 at 4:23 pmAs a Christian i objected to Pres. Clinton cheating on his wife and NOT calling what it was:sex outside of the marriage union.But it was not a Dem.-only case.It was not a reason to try to put him out of office.(Sinful YES!But only that.)
October 12th, 2006 at 4:25 pmI watched and wondered how a “wide margin” vote in Jeb Bush’s state shrank to a bare few.I wondered where the 3 million per-day oil from Iraq went to and the money therefrom.When the storms hit the gulf,i asked why the man who has as a “Base” the upper 10% rich(his words,not mine)who says he is a “Christian”allowed so much suffering to occur here.
Mr. Bush talks like he cares for the country he’s sworn to protect,yet his actions don’t match his promises to date.Clinton’s known sins seem to be between him and his wife.Mr Bush’s failures(and gross sin of failing to care for others) are against a MUCH larger group of people.
At Judgement Day,what will Almighty God & Jesus have to say about their conduct?
TOMMY…why would he sneak out documents? why would the documents pertain to terror plots? why would he destroy them?
Because he was up to no good. This was Nixon type crap.
Making out like it was nothing is just being dishonest. Something that TP and the regulars on here like yourself are very skilled at.
October 12th, 2006 at 4:30 pmKenny if you think that Clinton’s sins are not effecting a larger group you are mistaken. What in the hell do you call giving away technological secrets to China? We will pay dearly for that one. What do you call letting OBL go at least 8 times? We already paid dearly for that one.
As a Christian it is disappointing that our President was involved in sexual misconduct. But at the end of the day that was it, disappointing. The fact that he lied under oath and that testimony directly effected anoher legal case regarding sexual assault was another thing. The guy is a sexual deviant.
October 12th, 2006 at 4:36 pm#64
October 12th, 2006 at 4:39 pmagain proves my point that the right is obsessed with sex.
Boy that Clinton must be one powerful dude, what with all he’s accomplished over the last 6 years
Kool aid, anyone?
Clinton is old news guys. Trying to bore us to death?
October 12th, 2006 at 4:41 pmThanks, Ben, I was pretty sure I was correct, but you’ve eliminated any doubt.
October 12th, 2006 at 4:42 pmJust for the record, I would much rather have a president receive oral favors, no matter how immoral, than have a president deceive his citizens, at the expense of 3000+ of our country’s finest as well as the “nobody knows how many” injured and maimed
Just my $0.02
October 12th, 2006 at 4:52 pmThe GOP rubber-stampers have to be put out to pasture. They are a waste of our time and hard earned money.
October 12th, 2006 at 4:54 pmSeems Cliton is Bush’s babysitter right?
October 12th, 2006 at 5:17 pmThe only thing that Berger did that was stupid is to take paper copies of the originals from the building. He could have recorded the images on his cell phone more easily.
October 12th, 2006 at 5:20 pmOh - and by the way, the economy is great and Dow about to bust through 12,000. If this was the 90s the media would be having an orgasm about The Great Economy.
From Conservates to you whining libbies - You are welcome.
October 12th, 2006 at 5:25 pmbonesTwo,
just because a bunch of rich people got richer off the stock market, doesn’t mean the economy is doing great. I would rather be whiney than be sheep like. just keep on believing everything they tell you. glug glug glug.
October 12th, 2006 at 5:38 pmSpoogeBoy - it’s funny, the news articles of the 90s never made anything but positive corelations between the stock market at the economy? Weird, I guess it’s different now. Sounds like you’re the one being led around by CBS, NBC, ABC, AP, Reuters, NY Times. They talk, you listen then Blog it.
Yangho - I’m going to need to see your passport - I want you to report to the nearest INS office immediately - I’m making a citizens arrest. Are you from N Korea? Is Yangho slang for KJI? Hmmm. I’m suspicous. However, I’m sure you’re voting in mutliple democratic races this fall - good luck.
October 12th, 2006 at 5:47 pmSpoogeboy - Also - what do you think those pensions you hold so dearly are invested in? The stock market. What about your Labor Union dues / democratic war chest - stock market. You should be happy.
Oh - and the rich arent the only ones in the stock market. However, if you are poor, you are not in the stock market, but if you are in the stock market, you are not necessarily rich, just smart. And now that I type it, the ’smart’ label couldnt apply to you, so no wonder you’re angry. Sorry about that.
October 12th, 2006 at 5:51 pmhandle ben’s truth? wtf r u talking about ? take the hannity act somewhere else
October 12th, 2006 at 6:01 pm#77: bonesTwo - I’m going to need to see your passport - I want you to report to the nearest FBI office immediately - I’m making a citizens arrest. Are you Ex-Nazi? Did bonesTwo work as a guard in a Nazi concentration camp? Hmmm. I’m suspicous, we just got one in San Francisco. However, I’m sure you’re voting in mutliple repug races this fall - good luck.
October 12th, 2006 at 6:04 pmDamn Janho - i was looking for something much more clever from you. I’m disappointed.
October 12th, 2006 at 6:08 pm#81 It is because you’re not worth for clever options. Your words against yourself NAZI. You want to attack me not my point, that’s your fail.
October 12th, 2006 at 6:10 pmblying - uh, Berger by his own admission said they were not exact copies. Uh, that’s why there were 5. By his own admission they were different. He testified to that in open court. The documents were different because some had notes written on them and some were different versions. Again, why was he removing them? Why would someone do that? When he did not produce what was missing he claimed he destroyed them. Uh, why?
Because he had something to hide dumbass.
October 12th, 2006 at 6:21 pmIt’s amazing to me how some people who specifically identify themselves as Christians are so prideful, spiteful, and avaricious. You people are a disgrace to your religion.
Jesus save us from your followers.
October 12th, 2006 at 6:50 pmAnd they want to claim that we’re repressing their right to religious freedom by objecting to their compulstion to put their own religious beliefs into law and make us all comply with them. How bizarre.
October 12th, 2006 at 6:53 pmWhy can’t Conservative pundents understands the difference between copies and originals? The copies, made at a duplicating station were removed from the building, the originals were returned to the files. No files existing previous to Berger’s entry to the building were removed from the building were removed, only the copies created by Berger during his visit were taken away.
October 12th, 2006 at 7:01 pmPost #86 should read:
October 12th, 2006 at 7:11 pmWhy can’t Conservative pundents understand the difference between copies and originals? The copies, made at a duplicating station were removed from the building, the originals were returned to the files. No files existing previous to Berger’s entry to the building were removed, only the copies created by Berger during his visit were taken away.
Hey Walt that is not what happened. THAT’s how they knew documents were MISSING.
Staff at the Archives had been monitoring an unusual pattern of activity during Berger’s visits and (the Washington Post reports one source as saying) had “specially coded the papers to more easily tell whether some disappeared,” after noting some had previously gone missing.
So the documents were being removed. He was not just going to a copying machine and removing copies. He was removing documents.
Damn you people are really dumb.
October 12th, 2006 at 7:28 pmKzd, why are there laws that do not allow you to walk around in your front yard naked in front of your neighbors? Because society establishes the social conduct that they are willing to accept and that which they are not. Christians by a vast majority may object to certain lifestyles but for the most part they believe in our freedoms. What they object to is when morons start going down the road of interfering with seasonal holidays that recognize their beliefs like the birth of Christ on Christmas. They do it for themselves. They do not care if you want to believe is something else. The objections are just over the top and stupid.
October 12th, 2006 at 7:35 pmSo the documents were being removed. He was not just going to a copying machine and removing copies. He was removing documents.
Damn you people are really dumb.
Comment by Ben — October 12, 2006 @ 7:28 pm
This one conspiracy theory refuses to die. I wish it just went away.
Of course documents were removed. Documents that were copies of other documents that existed (and still exist) somewhere else. Even the lead prosecutor in that case said so:
After a long investigation, the lead prosecutor Noel Hillman, chief of the Justice Department’s public integrity section, stated that Berger only removed classified copies of data stored on hard drives stored in the National Archives, and that no original material was destroyed. The records he took were related to internal assessments of the Clinton administration’s handling of the failed 2000 millennium attack plots.
Wikipedia: Sandy Berger
Again: Whatever his intentions were, Sandy Berger did not destroy any original documents. Those are still available.
If anyone has evidence to the contrary, please present it. Either that or shut up.
October 12th, 2006 at 7:37 pmThere’s the ROTFL….really like bonestwo said you’re pretty shallow.
As far as the pedophile goes I guess Foley stuck around like Studds who actually had sex with a minor. You dumbasses kept electing the guy. Foley was put out on his ass and if he broke the law he should be prosecuted. But Dems don’t go that route. They reelect the Ted Kennedy’s of this world that actually kill people. Like Janet Reno at Waco. She sure was looking out for the children there wasn’t she? Your party is immoral and you are just stupid.
October 12th, 2006 at 7:41 pmHey George you don’t have evidence that makes your case other than a career political prosecutor. Why were they coding documents? Why did the Archives chief contact Clinton’s attorney rather than the FBI? Oh yeah he was a Clinton appointee.
You are so full of it it is coming out both ears. Again what was Berger doing?
No one is buying the Democrats bs on this one. The Clinton people had something to hide. There good at it. I seem to remember an attorney’s office whose records were removed after an untimely death. Ummm, I think the Clintons were involved in that one too.
October 12th, 2006 at 7:51 pmI second that, of course, but I am just part of the vast right wing conspiracy.
I will love to see what the clinton dream team will do when the dems lose this nov, what now? IF EVERYTHING YOU GUYS SAY IS TRUE - WHY ARE WE ONLY TALKING ABOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF DEMS PICKING UP 15 SEATS (out of 500+). Man, talk about a party in shambles. I’m not saying the repubs have it all together, but I’d be feeling a little uneasy if I was a DEM for the next few decades. Begala, Carville, Lanny, Clinton, Clinton, and whatever other apologists will probablyr revert to the voter fraud card - that’s what they thougth woudl work in 2000 and 2004.
You guys are the guppies of the mainstream media. They say it, you blog it and worse, believe it. The economy doesnt suck. There is no health care crisis (unless you beleive having the planets best health care system is a crisis). Bush didnt lie us into Iraq. Foley is a pervert but what happens to him when he is caught is indicative of a party with morals, vs the dems history of the same. Global Warming is almost as big a joke as Al Gore. Americans are anti abortion, and women more than men. People want to say prayers and say the pledge in schools, and have a fear of the 10 Commandments. Democrats are WEAK on terror, that’s a fact. You thik the terrorists should have more rights than a right winger.. Democrats love the UN and apologize for the US. The public school system sucks becuase of the teacher’s union. Social Secuirty is broken and Bush is hte only Pol in 30 years to talk about a real solution. Air America is going bankrupt just like the rest of the Dem agenda. Your time has come and gone, people can find out the facts, and since 1992 you’ve been out on your ass. Like my point above, even if you do take the house/senate - you will do so doing your best moderate republican imitations and that is not a long term strategy.
Didnt I hear that former QB in DC pretending he’s pro guns, pro life? Jeez - that sounds like a dem doesnt it? Sad.
October 12th, 2006 at 8:02 pm#94 - I don’t think Republican idea enough for u bonestwo, you hate oppose options without address where it is wrong. Bush din’t lie us inot Iraq so again where WMD? Clue for you: NorthKorea. Foley is a pervert because he’s coverred by his superviors. You don’t believe in Global Warming but believe in the FLOOD, it’s OK because it’s the same with me. Democrats are WEAK on terror and you guys are TERRORIST - threat ppl by torture bill and whitetap bill .I never think the terrorists should have more rights than a right winger but you think opposer is “ENERMY COMBATANT”. Oops I forgot that you think those Asia-Americans like me, have no right to drive or to vote. Democrats love the UN and apologize for the US? You forgot that Bush love UN more than Dems when he called for solve NK/Dafus crisis. FYI those countries have no oil wells.
October 12th, 2006 at 8:26 pmFor whole your love and hate, you should live in Nazi state, it more suit for you.
Hey George you don’t have evidence that makes your case other than a career political prosecutor.
Comment by Ben — October 12, 2006 @ 7:51 pm
I suppose you are talking to me. My evidence is better than yours -which is to say zero. You’ve now rolled two assertions into one, and tried to smear the prosecutor.
By the way, that “political prosecutor” was nominated to a federal judgeship in New Jersey by none other than Pres Bush himself. I guess Pres Bush rewarded Mr. Hillman’s “partisanship”.
Again, if you have better evidence than the one that was available to the prosecutors in that case, please share it. Without it, yours are just half-cooked speculations and smears.
October 12th, 2006 at 8:27 pmOsama bin Laden still on the loose? Blame Bill Clinton.
47 million without health care? Blame the democrats.
Disaster in Iraq? Blame the liberals.
A child predator in the House and republican leadership knowing about it? Blame the Democrats.
North Korea has the bomb? Blame Bill Clinto.
Notice the theme, ladies and gentlemen.
October 12th, 2006 at 9:00 pmROTFL - I say you should get ROTFL help - but maybe that’s all you can type with one hand.
What has happened to Foley is that he was forced out of the party in a seat guaranteed 100% to be republican and is now in play. If the repubs are as guilty of all this as you think - we wouldnt they have gotten him out way earlier and had the seat filled with some other repub in plenty of time to keep the seat (R). The answer…becuase they acted when they knew about it even to their own detriment. That is more courage than your president Clinton has ever shown.
The dems would have stalled, delayed, lied to keep the seat and then ‘dealt’ with it (like in NJ). That’s the difference, if Foley had a (d) by his name, he would still be in Congress - NO QUESTION.
ROTFL about you ROTFL while JO.
:)
October 12th, 2006 at 9:19 pm#94 - I don’t think Republican idea enough for u bonestwo, you hate oppose options without address where it is wrong. Bush din’t lie us inot Iraq so again where WMD? Clue for you: NorthKorea. Foley is a pervert because he’s coverred by his superviors. You don’t believe in Global Warming but believe in the FLOOD, it’s OK because it’s the same with me. Democrats are WEAK on terror and you guys are TERRORIST - threat ppl by torture bill and whitetap bill .I never think the terrorists should have more rights than a right winger but you think opposer is “ENERMY COMBATANTâ€. Oops I forgot that you think those Asia-Americans like me, have no right to drive or to vote. Democrats love the UN and apologize for the US? You forgot that Bush love UN more than Dems when he called for solve NK/Dafus crisis. FYI those countries have no oil wells.
For whole your love and hate, you should live in Nazi state, it more suit for you.
I’m a little lost but I think here is what you are saying…
Bush lied about WMD. Did he? I think they found WMD didnt they? Oh wait, pre-1992, etc, not those, these, I see. You are right, they didnt find the WMD that you wanted found. Is he also wrong about the Niger thing? or is Joe Wilson right about that…..oh wait, guess you guys were wrong about that one too.
Foley is a pervert becuase he’s covered by his supervisors? As convenient as that would be, there’s no evidence to that, and the testimony today has shown that this is, once again, a HUGE over-reach by the dem/media party. And here’s a questions, when you are a sexual predator, and you have no supervisors, who do those you prey on have to talk to? The answer….Ken Starr.
GLobal Wamring and the Flood? I am guessing this is a religious right comment about the biblical Noah’s arc story. Unsure of how the two are related or how I indicated I believed that that story is literal, but I will tell you this, I think there is actually more science in Noahs arc than Global Warming - and there’s about zero in Noahs.
That’s right, we torture the shit out of terrorists to get them to tell on their friends, and so far its working. And we listen to phone calls coming in/out of our country to terrorists. And again, I have yet to hear a candidate this fall in a tight race take your lib position on this. Why is that if it is so clear cut that Bush is a terrorist? Idiot.
And the UN thing with Darfur - I get it - no oil there so we don’t care about millions dying - I see. Are you forgetting that going into Iraq was actually the UNs idea, and we were the only ones willing to back up the words we signed off on?
I do think you should drive and vote, all only if you are here legally. Otherwise I think we should throw you in the can until the next cargo plane to wherever you are from is available and help you get back home. But I also think you should have to learn english, and clearly that’s moving along as well as it should be. Here’s a link you can try to help yourself out.
http://secure.hop.com/
ps - hop = hooked on phonics
Why should I live in Nazi state? Missed that one, lost in the translation I guess.
October 12th, 2006 at 9:36 pmThey were not weapons of mass destruction. Who the hell could Saddam kill with degraded pre-1991 weapons?
October 12th, 2006 at 9:50 pmThe republican leadership knew he was a pedophile for years and did nothing.
Lewinsky was not a sexual predator; she was just infatuated with Clinton.
October 12th, 2006 at 9:58 pmYeah we all should find WMD but your fantastic WMD lead to the war.
What kind of supervisors received complaints about sexual behavior of his staffs, then did nothing? Repug leaders?
And next step, would you want to torture me and listen my phone calls becasue of my anti-Bush words? Hope those communist tools will fall to you and your familly Idiot.
Oho when you Repugs love UN thing? Another thing we should backup the words we signed of on GENEVA Conventions.
Yes, at least, no you fascists around my house. Sure I trying to learn english to fight for my right - and even with my bad language, I never give up my fight.
October 12th, 2006 at 10:08 pmGood for you yangho - i welcome you(if you are legal). At least you arent typing ROTFL every 2 seconds.
And next step, would you want to torture me and listen my phone calls becasue of my anti-Bush words? Hope those communist tools will fall to you and your familly Idiot.
Thanks for the sentiment, but if I am talking to a terrorist in Syria, I hope they fall on me too - for your sake, your family sake, my neihbors sake, etc. You see, that’s the problem with libs, security just is not important to your party.
October 12th, 2006 at 10:14 pm-Let’s assume for a moment that Foley was force out by republicans. These same republicans sat on the information for years that Foley was a pedophile and only forced him out when the media got a hold of the information. If it wasn’t for the media, a pedophile would still be in Congress with the republican leadership having full knowledge of it just to protect their majority.
-You’re argument abut 100% guaranteed republican seat is nonsensical. Could you imagine how many seats they would have lost if a republican pedophile remained in office?
October 12th, 2006 at 10:17 pmBerger’s Plea Wall Street Journal. (Eastern edition). New York, N.Y.: Apr 6, 2005. pg. A.10
So we called Justice Department Public Integrity chief prosecutor Noel Hillman, who assured us that Mr. Berger did not deny any documents to history. “There is no evidence that he intended to destroy originals,” said Mr. Hillman. “There is no evidence that he did destroy originals. We have objectively and affirmatively confirmed that the contents of all the five documents at issue exist today and were made available to the 9/11 Commission.”
The Berger File
Wall Street Journal. (Eastern edition). New York, N.Y.: Apr 8, 2005. pg. A.12
Some people won’t let a bad conspiracy theory go. We’re referring to those who loudly assert that former NSC adviser Sandy Berger was trying to protect the Clinton Administration when he illegally removed copies of sensitive documents from the National Archives in late 2003.
On Wednesday, we quoted Justice Department prosecutor Noel Hillman that no original documents were destroyed, and that the contents of all five at issue still exist and were made available to the 9/11 Commission. But that point didn’t register with some readers, who continue to suggest a vast, well, apparently a vast left- and right- wing conspiracy. The Washington Times, the Rocky Mountain News and former Clintonite Dick Morris have also been peddling dark suspicions based on misinformation.
The confusion seems to stem from the mistaken idea that there were handwritten notes by various Clinton Administration officials in the margins of these documents, which Mr. Berger may have been able to destroy. But that’s simply an “urban myth,” prosecutor Hillman tells us, based on a leak last July that was “so inaccurate as to be laughable.” In fact, the five iterations of the anti-terror “after- action” report at issue in the case were printed out from a hard drive at the Archives and have no notations at all.
“Those documents, emphatically, without doubt — I reviewed them myself — don’t have notations on them,” Mr. Hillman tells us. Further, “there is no evidence after comprehensive investigation to suggest he took anything other than the five documents at issue and they didn’t have notes.” Mr. Berger’s sentencing is scheduled for July, and Mr. Hillman assures us Justice’s sentencing memo will lay out the facts and “make sure Mr. Berger explains what he did and why he did it.” Meanwhile, conservatives don’t do themselves any credit when they are as impervious to facts as the loony left.
October 12th, 2006 at 10:19 pmOf course it is. That’s why it is so important that we get Bush and the far right republicans out of office.
October 12th, 2006 at 10:22 pmboned(not) or whatever the hell you’re trying to call yourself there. you’re not even good at what you’re trying to do, so stop.
October 12th, 2006 at 10:25 pmWhat is this tripe about?
October 12th, 2006 at 10:27 pmIs he spying on terrorists; is he taking the Nixon approach and spying on political enemies; or is he doing a combination of both? Who Knows?
October 12th, 2006 at 10:33 pmSo?
It’s not like anyone in America cares about…. anything? Oh, sorry… the feminists care about themselves, but everyone else…. nothing.
October 12th, 2006 at 11:01 pmI kind of like ROTFL each your post but it not vacuum yet.
It is because I’m fan of Benjamin Franklin. He said “The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either”. He is liberty, isn’t he? So you give the govt right of torture any terrorist detainees. Let think they torture me and I tell them you are my combantant - and they will throw you to Gitmo, torture you, keep you there forever without warrant from court. It is because you allow them free to define who is terorrist. No laywer, no testify in court to fight for your right. We definely must eliminate terrorist but we also protect our Democracy. I don’t think our Democracy lack of tool to deal with terrorist.
October 12th, 2006 at 11:45 pmbruthful you’re ROCK. I kind of hard to understand CRAZY CHRISTIAN and their LOGIC. They repeat Jessus words “Turn the Other Cheek”, “God you don’t believe in still loves you” but ready vote for Torture, vote for Evil war. They fight against abortion but support for killing Iraqi children. They cried out anti-gay, anti-pedo but they light Foley scandal. They highlight they’re superior in Familly Value, but they tried to equal their immorality with Dems whom they think less moral. They vote for everyone who tell them GOD is exist, even how evil how lie those policians are. They contradict theirselves and their belief.
October 13th, 2006 at 2:58 amHarry Ried filed fraudulent income tax returns without the K1’s for an LLC that he now claims he was a member of. Harry Ried should go to Jail!
October 13th, 2006 at 3:00 amalready caught the details on that , bob, so take your snake oil somewhere else. you think nobody reads the f-ing paper? dittohead.
October 13th, 2006 at 3:07 amDo you folks ever get frustrated arguing with the righest trolls? I mean they know they are lying, we know they’re lying and no facts are going to make them admit to their lies. They just repackage and repeat them ad nauseum.
October 13th, 2006 at 8:27 amWow, you lying sacks of sh!t were busy last night. You don’t like me or my points of view so you lie. You call me a Troll and want me to go away then here is the deal.
#14 – rob
#16 Wayne
#19 DrxJ
You all said I stood up for Foley and that I gay bashed. Show me where I did either of these and I will go away. Otherwise you are making stuff up like you normally do on this sight. Prove me wrong and I go away. Do not do so and I will increase my postings ten fold. I will just paste articles from Drudge report even if they have nothing to do with the topic.
I was Happy Foley resigned. I can’t stand the thought of Pedophiles. I stated that you people cared more about getting a Republican than having sensitivity for a minor or his family. Throw the bastard in jail for all I care. I don’t want him on my side.
Show me one anti gay or anti homosexual comment. I dare you. Not even in jest or a flippant comment. Go ahead or at some point today you will see what troll really means.
You lie. You blatantly make things up because you have no real facts or arguments. That is why you will lose again. I will be hear laughing after the elections like you wont believe. You can cry stolen elections all you want but it just shows your opinions are a warped minority.
October 13th, 2006 at 8:49 amKlyde, you side does not argue. It name calls (Crazy Christian), makes things up and repeats stupid junk like ROTFL.
Just the same junk over and over.
The Democrats had control for 50 year. They created a welfare state. Now the Republicans are in to bring responsibility and clean the mess. You will lose in November again.
October 13th, 2006 at 9:18 amWay to go Happy Guy - I like your point (which I know people will be surprised at). If Al Franken says it - it’s gospel to these nuts. The crazy christian thing is a perfect analogy to how they really feel about conservatives who believe in God, believe in teh military, believe in capitalism, and believe in the greatness of the USA. The dem party stands for the exact opposite of all these -
No God anywhere unless it is revernce to the terrorists God - then we need to provide Korans
Military sucks, Dems demolished out military might (covert ops, intelligence included) in the 90s and will do so again if put in power.
Capitalism means invisible hand, lower taxes, lower regulations, ALL of which dems vote against.
Dems love the UN’s approach to international affairs (diplomacy) where we trust but verify, walk softly but carry a big stick. WHERE IS THE PARTY OF FDR? I tell you what, if there was an FDR party, then the repubs would be in trouble, but the party of MoveOn.org and Hillary are so far out as to be lunacy.
However, nobody here has yet tio argue on the facts, or answer my one key questions pointing out the lib probem. Why are the dem candidates in any tight congressional race talking about tax cuts, tough on terror and lower taxes? Becuase the only way they can get elected is to act like a Conservative. This too shall pass.
OUT.
And of course.
ROTFL.
October 13th, 2006 at 10:01 amAgain bonestwo all you believe GOD, teh military, capitalism and greatness of USA are no enough for a DEMOCRACY COUNTRY, there are human rights, personal freedom, freedom of religion and belief, and equalitarian society off which you CRAZY CHRISTIAN stands for exact opposite. But it is OK, this country banlance between righ stuffs and left stuffs.
October 13th, 2006 at 10:54 amLet think if the country were enough of you CRAZY CHRISTIAN who only believe in GOD, military, capitalism and greatness of USA, what the country could be like? THE REICH? You will love it bonestwo, it’s suitable with your dream.
So are you telling me that the founding fathers were the pure incarnation of the reich. They were all christians but saw fit to build a government that included freedom of religion (not Freedome FROM religion I tell you). The only thing I wish is that libs running for office would talk about their true intention.
You’re not making sense.
October 13th, 2006 at 11:00 amHappy, Bonesy, and whoever else - There’s really no need for you to reiterate the screeds formulated by Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and their like here. Anyone with a TV or a newspaper is as familiar with their thinking as they care to be, and your never-ending paraphrasing of what they have to say is neither informative nor productive. It is not news to anyone here, nor does it “challenge” anyone’s thinking about issues, policy, or personalities. There are plenty of places on the interenet where your brand of “stuff” will get you the recognition you’re looking for, and you’ll maybe even make some new friends. Seek those sites out - have those friends, and have a nice day.
October 13th, 2006 at 11:09 am131 - because you’ve cornered the market (or glenn beck has) as to all the intents and purposes of the founders’ ? you arrogant simp.
October 13th, 2006 at 11:11 amGOD SHOULD EVERYWHERE, that the reason he is GOD, where your belief?
Let consider you’re handicapped, you may not want the “Invisible Hand” sweep you out earth? Fair and banlance that all we need or the LOVE your GOD teach you.
I know you idea, REpugs only need UN to clear their mess, Darfus no profit -call UN, NK no profit - call UN, Iraq mess - call UN for relief only so on. NO SUPPRISE they oppose us. You want to use big stick with UN? Oh I don’t think they’re all stupid like you. You want our country is AN Empire? Again Reich is suitable for you, they don’t care any kind of UN.
THEY ARE CHRISTIAN NOT CRAZY CHISTIAN. Crazy chistian misinterept GOD WILL to THEIR WILL.
October 13th, 2006 at 11:21 amThe Repulsivescum party…
…and America’s TREASONOUS social conservatives…
…must be PURGED…
…these are your neighbors, friends, family members, associates…
…why do you tolerate their racism, their intolerance, their homophobia, their murderous, conniving, selfish, hypocrisy?
How can you STAND to sit and eat with them, laugh and joke with them, and ultimately embrace them?
October 13th, 2006 at 12:23 pmStill not facts or content from this bunch.
They want religious freedom for all, (Except the Crazy Christians).
They want freedom of speech and to express ideas (unless you have a conservative point of view).
They do not like what you are doing (but don’t tell you want they would do differently)
They are hypocrites, conspiracy nuts and losers of elections.
October 13th, 2006 at 1:09 pmHappy, you don’t want facts - you want Rush and Glenn to pat you on the head. Guess what, they’re not going to.
Like the other dittoheads, you have the pot-and-kettle thing down pat. Like the other dittoheads, you project you own motives onto others. Like the other dittoheads, you are a broken record of b.s. trying hard to shout down every inconvenient piece of info that makes it onto your little radar screen, and when that doesn’t work, your resort to the ad hominem. Don’t feign shock and outrage when the medicine you so liberally prescribe for others is, in turn, prescribed for you.
October 13th, 2006 at 1:17 pmNo, I want religious freedom for all include Crazy Christians whom make me ROTFL but I fear their rasist opinions. They think GOD is just for them.
Please speak out your political ideas , but don’t comment mine by your fascist words. AGAIN Crazy Christians have NO LOGIC at all.
October 13th, 2006 at 1:28 pmDemanding that our government recognize your religious holidays is a great affront to my religious freedom. Why don’t you close your business for the holiest of my holidays? The government displaying a 50 foot cross is a very clear statement that this government is a Christian organization. Insisting that the 10 commandments be displayed in a courthouse is to demand that the courts be Christian. If the courts are Christian then Christianity must receive preferential treatment.
Religious freedom is not what you want, you demand religious oppression on your own behalf.
Why is it important to you that ‘intelligent design’ be taught in public schools? Are you unable to teach creation to your own children? Or do you seek to have creation taught to the children of people that choose not to teach it to their children because they don’t want them taught it. This is about the clearest example there is in recent times of one group of Americans trying to force your religion on the rest of us. Then you claim oppression when Wal Mart employees say “Happy Holidays” to you.
October 13th, 2006 at 7:05 pmIt’s people like Happy Guy that put this bunch of clowns in office and they still have to back them. They need to wake up before we lose this country. Yes there are some in both parties and I for one would point them out in a minute.
October 13th, 2006 at 7:34 pmWe all must stand together if we are going to keep this country like our fore fathers fought for it, for them and us.
Don’t let them down!!!
THIS JUST IN FROM FOX NEWS: CLINTON SEEN DOING RAIN DANCE DAY BEFORE KATRINA HIT. BUSH ABSOLVED. KARL ROVE AND CONGRESS CALL FOR CLINTON TO BE INVESTIGATED FOR CAUSING HURRICANE. REST OF DEMS TO BE CENSURED FOR INVOLVEMENT OF COVERUP. STAY TUNED THIS STORY WILL BE RUN EVERY 10 MIN. BILL O STATES MOTHER NATURE WAS EYEWITNESS. HANNITY CALLS FOR DEATH PENALTY. SWIFT BOAT VETS ALONG WITH RUSH LIMBAUGH TO RECEIVE CONGRESSIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR FOR ACTS OF BRAVERY DURING STORM. COWARDS JOHN KERRY, MAX CLELAND AND JOHN MURTHA SEEN LEAVING TOWN AS RAIN BEGAN. HUMANITARIAN OF THE YEAR AWARD TO BE GIVEN TO BARB BUSH FOR LETTING REFUGEES OF KATRINA LEAD THE GOOD LIFE INSIDE OF SUPERDOME. PRESIDENT GUARANTEES AID BY 2008.
October 13th, 2006 at 7:54 pm[…] A group of conservative lawmakers, led by Armed Services Committee Chairman Duncan Hunter (R-CA) and Judiciary Committee Chairman James Sensenbrenner (R-WI), called on House Government Reform Committee Chairman Tom Davis (R-VA) to once again investigate former National Security Adviser Sandy Berger’s handling of classified documents.read more | digg story Links […]
October 19th, 2006 at 3:28 pm[…] Page Summary: All this blaming just gives Clinton power he does not have. How about we start with an investigation about the lies that got us into Iraq. The context was a lawsuit in which Bilbray claimed his children were out-of-state residents who deserved to pay the same tuition as undocumented immigrants who lived in-state. Christians by a vast majority may object to certain lifestyles but for the most part they believe in our freedoms.read more | digg story […]
October 27th, 2006 at 4:37 am[…] 78. Congressional conservatives wanted to investigate Sandy Berger, but not the Iraq war. [Link] […]
November 6th, 2006 at 6:13 pm