Comments on: O’Reilly: ‘You Cannot Be Confrontational With The President of the United States’

By: sheila c

sheila c — Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:27:35 +0000

When, “respect” trumps truth-seeking, democractic action and real discussion, we’re all in trouble.

By: Timotheus

Timotheus — Thu, 19 Oct 2006 02:47:58 +0000

Is Bush dumb because he’s got a southern accent, dumb because he’s a self-professed Christian, or dumb because he doesn’t think hate disappears when occupation does? The world can only handle SO MANY unfunny Dane Cook wannabe armchair comedians, people. I can now commence ignoring ignorance.

By: robert

robert — Wed, 18 Oct 2006 21:17:48 +0000

filed under: DIPSHIT

By: Viva La Blog » Oâ€™Reilly: â€˜You Cannot Be Confrontational With The President of the United Statesâ€™

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:39:14 +0000

[...] Original post by Judd [...]

By: KG Prophet

KG Prophet — Wed, 18 Oct 2006 11:31:04 +0000

Wow! I finally get what O’Reilly is saying! Our president is so weak and such a poor leader, that we true patriots must stifle our criticisms. We can’t make it too obvious for those evil-doers to find out what a boob Bush really is.

By: Zooey

Zooey — Wed, 18 Oct 2006 04:23:01 +0000

Caption contest:

A little KY…please….?

By: JPark

JPark — Wed, 18 Oct 2006 03:57:51 +0000

BO isn’t too bright. And you morons who watch/listen to him are even more idiotic.

By: ForTruth

ForTruth — Wed, 18 Oct 2006 03:52:03 +0000

OMG, a caption to that pic, anyone, I am thinking of an intruder of some sort…

By: ForTruth

ForTruth — Wed, 18 Oct 2006 03:51:07 +0000

Letterman friken slammed him.

By: Destardi

Destardi — Wed, 18 Oct 2006 02:34:39 +0000

goddamn I can’t stand this douchebag.

By: miles

miles — Wed, 18 Oct 2006 01:49:38 +0000

Don’t his fans feel like he’s always talking down to them? How do they stand to listen?

By: ForTruth

ForTruth — Wed, 18 Oct 2006 01:25:03 +0000

Excuse me? As proud long-time owner of a gorgeous vagina, I resent that remark.

Comment by Zooey

OMG.

By: ren

ren — Wed, 18 Oct 2006 00:43:43 +0000

Bush signs torture bill; Americans lose essential freedom. October 17, 2006

George W. Bush got what he wanted, ostensibly as a tool in his unfocused “war on terror”: By signing into law the Military Commissions Act of 2006, Bush has made it legal for the C.I.A. to continue operating torture facilities in undisclosed, foreign countries, and for the writ of habeas corpus to be suspended for individuals who are designated “enemy combatants” against the U.S. (Designated by whom? That question remains unanswered.) The law also “establishes military tribunals that would allow some use of evidence obtained by coercion [that is, torture], but would give defendants access to classified evidence being used to convict them.” (Reuters)
The provisions of Bush’s new torture law mean that Americans have lost the key, constitutional right on which Anglo-American criminal law (and criminal-law procedures in true democracies in general) is founded; that’s the basic right of an individual to know why he or she is being apprehended and detained. Now, technically, as in Stalin’s Soviet Union, Hitler’s Germany, Mao’s China or Pol Pot’s Cambodia, anyone labeled an “enemy combatant” – again, by whom; by Bush? – can be whisked away and never heard from again. That kind of authority, in the hands of corrupt or untruthful politicians, may or may not be an effective tool in some kind of “war on terror,” but it certainly can be a useful tool when it comes to silencing their opponents.

In an Orwellian pronouncement dutifully reported by Voice of America, the taxpayer-funded “news” service that acts as a mouthpiece for the administration, Bush said: “The United States does not torture….It is against our laws and it is against our values. By allowing the C.I.A. program to go forward, this bill is preserving a tool that has saved American lives.” Bush’s claim flies in the face of numerous reports of torture conducted by American officials at U.S. military prisons or secret locations overseas.

By: Zooey

Zooey — Wed, 18 Oct 2006 00:33:35 +0000

Oâ€™Reily is a vagina.
Comment by EMan

Excuse me? As proud long-time owner of a gorgeous vagina, I resent that remark.

By: Jerry B. Falls

Jerry B. Falls — Tue, 17 Oct 2006 23:41:30 +0000

I served my country for twenty four years and retired in 1973. Nineteen of those years were on Submarines during the cold war. Of those, The missile Boats were the one’s when Prince George of the low IQ and temper tantrums bothered me the most. He is the one who has his hand on the button to unleash those missile’s. A person of his sanity is as dangerous as Lil Kim. The boat itself only knows the US is under attack. What ifd this imbicle decided to unleash these weapons on any nation?

O’Rielly is as insane as BUSHIE. Let us all pray that someone, somewhere keeps BUSHIE under control!

O’Rielly should as DUBYA a ton of questions including Why did you say after the first plane hit the World Trade Center,”He sure must have been a bad pilot.” Then after the second plane hit, WHY DID YOU SIT ON A CHILDS CHAIR FOR SEVEN MINUTES WHILE THE TOWER’S WERE FALLING DOWN.

Then leave Florida and head west!!!!

WHY, WHY, WHY, Did the American people let him steal two elections!!!

Trust must be earned, Not given!!

By: DanielK.

DanielK. — Tue, 17 Oct 2006 22:28:25 +0000

This can only mean that Bill O’Reilly is going to skulk on over to Chris Wallace’s office and give him a severe whuppin’.

By: EMan

EMan — Tue, 17 Oct 2006 22:17:04 +0000

O’Reily is a vagina.

By: me

me — Tue, 17 Oct 2006 22:03:03 +0000

u dont think orielly looks like a nut

By: yangho

yangho — Tue, 17 Oct 2006 20:13:02 +0000

He meant “You Cannot Be Confrontational With The King of the United States The man of GOD”

By: Yeti_Steve

Yeti_Steve — Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:59:30 +0000

He doesn’t want to be confrontational with the president because he doesn’t want to die.