Think Progress

Cheney: I Would ‘Probably Not’ Testify Before Congress, Even If Subpoenaed

This morning on ABC, George Stephanopoulos asked Vice President Cheney if he would testify before Congress if he was subpoenaed. Cheney said “probably not in the sense at that vice president and president and constitutional officers don’t appear before the Congress.”

Stephanopoulos noted that President Gerald Ford testified before Congress. Watch it:

[flv http://video.thinkprogress.org/2006/11/cheneycongress.320.240.flv]

Digg It!

Transcript:

STEPHANOPOULOS: You’ve talked a lot about the consequences of the Democrats taking over congress in the last week. Nancy Pelosi said this: “we win, speaking of the democrat, we get subpoena power.” If you’re subpoenaed by the Democrats, would you go?

CHENEY: I have no idea that i’m going to be subpoenaed. Obviously, we’d sit down and look at it at the time. But probably not in the sense at that Vice President and President and constitutional officers don’t appear before the Congress.

STEPHANOPOULOS: That’s your view of executive power? You’re not going to go up and testify.

CHENEY: I think that’s been the tradition. I can’t remember the last time a President did appear before the Congress. Or a Vice President.

STEPHANOPOULOS: Gerald Ford, I think.

CHENEY: That’s right. But not on a subpoena, he did it on his own.



147 Responses to “Cheney: I Would ‘Probably Not’ Testify Before Congress, Even If Subpoenaed”

  1. Pete_Bogs says:

    I’m ok with this… arrest the SOB instead…


  2. Indypendant says:

    Wasn’t Clinton forced to testify to Congress?


  3. Jay Randal says:

    See Cheney admits he is above the law > he must be impeached ASAP!


  4. DieNowForPeace says:

    Seems he’s got only 3 choices:

    Quit now, go to jail after the investigations, or take the midnight train to slab city when that pacemaker gives out.

    Very soon he’ll learn he’s NOT above the law.


  5. Tom says:

    Ahhh, the imperial presidency! Dick the Prick is resisting any accountability. So what else is new?
    Personally, I would like to see him shackled and perp-walked into Congress for a grilling if he refuses to respond to a supoena. Here’s the first question to be asked: “Dickie, did you read the 1999 report from the Pentagon that concluded Iraq could likely not be stabilized even if the invading force was 400,000 troops and the borders were effectively sealed?”
    GDumbya and Dick the Prick should be fired, not impeached! They are totally and utterly incompetent.
    Thankfully, the power in Congress will shift on Tuesday and we will finally have one major branch of government that will be acting in the interest of the country.


  6. Martin Stone Davis says:

    The transcript is wrong! It’s Cheney who noted that For had appeared, not Stephanopoulos.

    CHENEY: I think that’s been the tradition. I can’t remember the last time a President did appear before the Congress. Or a Vice President. Gerald Ford, I think.

    STEPHANOPOULOS: That’s right.

    CHENEY: But not on a subpoena, he did it on his own.


  7. Zwack says:

    He’s right… He won’t testify before Congress.

    He might be asked to, but he can always plead the fifth in his impeachment hearings…

    Z.


  8. RealScientist says:

    Seize his passport.


  9. oldtree says:

    well, it seems the shooter has something to hide?
    I wonder if he talks like this because he really believes he is king? or is it that he knows the vote is rigged well enough that he won’t have to appear?
    let’s put it this way, if he doesn’t have to testify, we won’t have a country


  10. unbelievable says:

    Talking to the working-class peasants is just so beneath the Prince of Death.


  11. Jeff says:

    Maybe they all have a suicide pact. It’s the only explanation for their Jihad-like attitude.


  12. Judd says:

    Transcript is correct. It’s just the audio that’s a little screwed up. George is the one who brought up Ford.


  13. DieNowForPeace says:

    ANYONE with as much power as Dickhead who refuses to follow the rule of law time and time again, DOES NOT BELONG IN POLITICAL OFFICE.

    Every single motive is based on his own self interests and benefit.

    When our government seeks the truth, it is in our Nations best interest to cooperate.

    By snubbing his impending subpoena, he once again gives the finger the every citizen in this Country, and to the Country itself.

    Defenders of freedom MY ASS.


  14. animaniac says:

    @Indypendant: No he testified to a grand jury.

    The scary part is in the second bit he speaks about himself as if he were president and then pauses for a second and adds vice president.


  15. km4 says:

    OK if Cheney refuses to testify before Congress then let’s just wait for the Ango-American War Crimes Trial of 2010 at The Hague under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court.

    Scenes We’d Like to See
    http://billmon.org/archives/001864.html


  16. Suburban Guerrilla » Nope says:

    [...] if the Dems win control of Congress, he “probably” won’t comply with subpoenas. Permalink| [...]


  17. Erroll says:

    If the word accountability still has any meaning left in today’s society, then Cheney and Bush and the rest of the cabal must be charged with crimes against peace and crimes against humanity. Justice, against the Iraqis and Americans who have been needlessly killed, demand that this be carried out.


  18. Krazny says:

    Subpoenas are sooo pre-9/11. What you liberals don’t get, is we are fighting them over there so we can stay the course, and not be weak on national security, or some such bs.

    My question; if Cheney does refuse a subpoena from congress, what’s next? Jail time? fines? impeachment? What can congress do?


  19. geoman77 says:

    Why do I always hear “The Imperial March” from Star Wars everytime I see this guy’s mug?


  20. west virginia hillbilly says:

    Off subject, but, has anyone thought about the scenario that the GOP holds onto its majority?
    What will we do then?


  21. Judd says:

    Cheney actually has a reasonable legal argument, but if you are the House of Representatives, you can make the administration’s life pretty miserable. Withold funding for certain programs, etc.


  22. Jules says:

    West Virginia Hillbilly – that question keeps me awake nights.


  23. College Progressive says:

    The reason Cheney et. al don’t care about breaking the law?

    They can just get pardoned the second before Bush leaves office. All of them.


  24. medicis says:

    If Dick ever got close to having to testify his buddies in the shadow gov would do another false flag thingie and then his puppet would declare martial law and the camps would be open for business……

    You really think the recent laws removing Americans’ rights had any other purpose? Duh.


  25. SouthwestBob says:

    After the Dems take control of congress, the Cheney/Rove and puppet bush gang will work as hard as they can to avoid any investigation into their closed door dealings. Based on what they have done already, there will be a renewed push to extend the authority of the president over congress in all matters relating to government oversight, especially while we are at war! We can expect that they will fight every attempt to gain access to records through numerous court filings since this would reveal the inner workings of this high efficient mis-administration during “war time conditions.” It will be two years of blocking every attempt to uncover the truth.


  26. Concerned Citizen says:

    The sheet ARROGANCE of Cheney and this “Administration”!! They think that they are above the law.

    they dont have a conscience.

    they DO NOT care about their constituants that put them in power in the first place.

    they are interested in only MONEY and POWER. their goal is to at least have an imperial goverment in which the AMERICAN PEOPLE have NO RIGHTS (Think HABEAUS CORPUS)

    no matter what Republican pundits say, this administration has already either paid them off, or fooled them entirely.

    they would rather “STAY THE COURSE” rather than admit mistakes in reference to this Sham of a War! where THOUSANDS of soldiers have died for an UNJUST cause.

    they WILL NOT get away with this. they WILL pay.


  27. Mike says:

    ToTheCenter.com Of course he won’t… he’s above that.


  28. BroD says:

    He can testify at his impeachment hearing or not. I could care less.


  29. Mark says:

    Cheney keeps saying that we have to ’succeed’ in Iraq. Succeed has a definition, but he refuses to use the one that’s in the dictionary. It must be a definition that he’s simply made up.

    Success for Cheney means this: It means we must use our entire treasury and put your children and grandchildren in impossible-to-service debt. It means that even if the country is opposed to the war, or if it divides us as a nation, we will continue to fight it. It means that we can rack up as many deaths as necessary to be ‘right’. It means we’ll be in the midst of a civil war, despite the fact that we have no business fighting someone’s civil war. It means…

    IT MEANS WHATEVER CHENEY DECIDES IT MEANS. But it certainly has nothing to do with what the rest of us know as the definition of the word success.

    I’m watching this taped, right now. Cheney is the President. It’s not possible that Bush could actually be the Prezidunce simply because Cheney uses actual complete sentences. Bush does not. He speaks a regional version of English only.


  30. Joneses says:

    A subpoena is a legal form, it is mandatory that you appear and/or make arrangements to appear at a certain date, time, and place, usually before a certified court reporter and attorneys. Not complying to such legal request, you may be a subject for arrest upon approval by a judge, and possible jail time. I don’t think it would go that far, but who knows, plus Chenny has powerful attorney power, and there is also the 5th.


  31. G4Dualie says:

    I don’t hear it the same way most do I guess. Is it just me, or does anyone else hear it like this: ?

    …we’d sit down and look at it at the time. But probably. Not in the sense at that Vice President and President and constitutional officers don’t…

    If you agree, then this thread appears to be a bit disingenuous. I think the Cheney quote from 1991 is more interesting.


  32. Gregor Samsa says:

    I have no idea that i’m going to be subpoenaed.

    For misleading the country into a needless invasion, perhaps? No?

    Vice President and President and constitutional officers don’t appear before the Congress.

    Not surprisingly, VP Cheney thinks Pres Bush and himself are above the law.

    They refuse to take responsibility, and be held accountable for the mess their administration has been.

    Party of values and personal responsibility indeed.


  33. wisedup says:

    Who was it that said: ‘ I’m not a crook?’…..and ‘If the president does it,it’s not against the law?’….now who was that…hmmmm.


  34. John Deek says:

    Dick Cheney being put under oath would be like a vampire being put in a tanning bed. If this guy had to string two consistent sentences together his head would explode. Unfortunately for people like him reality has a liberal bias.


  35. Karim says:

    Cheney will not abide by the law? Fine. Let him be impeached and removed from office. That way we can have real leadership.


  36. Zooey says:

    If Cheney was called before Congress, he would say exactly the same thing — whether he was subpoenaed, sworn in, or not.

    The ONLY thing that is important to Cheney is his own agenda. Absolutely everything else is expendable.


  37. Marie says:

    Who does he think he is saying he would defy a court order? Laws apply to all citizens including those who think they are above the rest of us. They have their attorneys already setting the stage to keep Bush&Co from any type of prosecution, but it is my hope that in the end, our democracy will still prevail, despite the criminals at the top.
    I’d love to see him hauled off in contempt of court.
    Then, I’d love to see him and the rest of Bush&Co on trial for their war crimes.


  38. steve says:

    sometimes we do things, we should do things we don’t have to do. Gerry Ford, we used to laugh at him. He looks pretty good now, eh?


  39. Zak44 says:

    Abraham Lincoln submitted himself to Congressional questioning. Cheney thinks he’s above Lincoln?


  40. CSE says:

    The best way to keep the Dick Cheney in check is to vote Democrat. Sad but true. At the very least, the HR must be won and controlled by the Democratic Party. If another mandate is handed to a rubber stamp GOP controlled congress – we can be guarateed incompetence and corruption. There is no alternative.

    Just Vote Democrat…


  41. margaret says:

    Dick doesn’t have time to testify. You people are so demanding!

    What with having at least two governments to run – Bush’s “government” and the Cheney/Rumsfeld shadow government – and spending all that quality time with his friends at FOX “news” and Rush Limbaugh…


  42. Taos Tiger says:

    The only honorable thing for Dick to do it fall on his f**king sword. But then did Dick ever do anything honorable?


  43. @T says:

    Echoing the Pete Bogs comment:

    Yes, arrest them. Why the military hasn’t removed them — along with a passel of the complicit Congress — is an interesting question.


  44. Briseadh na Faire says:

    Because of the separation of powers doctrine there has been an historical reluctance on the part of Congress to subpoena members of the Executive Branch. There have been rare instances of testimony before Congress, but usually not under subpoena. Neither party wants to establish a precedent which would then be used against themselves when it’s their turn to hold the Presidency.

    So, the odds of Congress forcing Cheney or Bush to testify is about nil. And the odds of either of them giving testimony under oath is probably less than that.

    The question remains, however, will they testify in their own defense in an Impeachment proceeding?


  45. U Got To Be Kidding!! says:

    Date: 8 November 2006

    Time: 0835 hrs

    Location: Vice Presidents Mansion

    (Cheney kicking and screaming, and grabbing his heart)

    I AM THE VICE PRESIDENT, YOU CAN’T DO THIS TO ME!!!!!

    I AM THE LAW!!!

    I’m SICK!!!

    BUSH DID IT!!! BUSH DID IT!!! BUSH DI I beeeeeeeeeeeepppppppp!!!

    RIP
    SGT Stephen R Sherman
    C CO 1-5 IN (Stryker)
    3 Feb 2005
    Mosul, Iraq

    Died because Saddam Hussein had in his focus the “Preparation of Nuclear Weapons”

    Or as the President of The Divided States of America so thoughtfully thinks of as comma # 1492

    Burn In Hell All of you


  46. RUCerious says:

    Go ahead dickhead, refuse a summons from Congress.
    the Constitution, Article II, Section 4, “The President, Vice President, and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”
    I would say we have lots of high Crimes, but isn’t failure to appear a misdemeanor>?
    Too bad it requires two thirds of the Senate to convict.


  47. keepyourheaddown says:

    dickie boy does the name Spiro Agnew mean anything to you???


  48. BJ Arvin says:

    Check out CommonDreams.org article WAR CRIMINALS, BEWARE.


  49. keiran says:

    If there is any justice he will do serious time and die in prison. What an evil pig.


  50. nostrafarious says:

    Cheney knows he won’t ever testify, because by then we will be under martial law and the congress will be moot.


  51. speed bone says:

    I say skip the supoena and just waterboard him. Then have the new interrogation expert come in and finish up. Mr. Haggert… commence to speed boning this fat pigs ass.


  52. theswan says:

    Die in prison?
    Like Sadam a rope would be better. I believe the senator from virginia has the rope needed.
    If he is allowed to get to prison it is likely he would pull a hitler and stick his finger in an electrical socket sending his defibulator all kinds of wonderful vibes.


  53. Scott says:

    “The charges against me are, if you’ll pardon the expression,
    damned lies. I am innocent of these charges. If indicted, I will
    -not- resign.” — Spiro Agnew, September, 1973.

    Agnew also argued that a Vice-President could not be indicted, but Nixon’s Solicitor General said otherwise.


  54. Hosekuervo says:

    Ha Ha Ha!!!
    Remember when the GOP was trying to justify their domestic spying program? Their mantra was “If you haven’t done anything wrong, you don’t have anything to worry about”. I wonder what Dickie boy is worried about???


  55. ffakrnull says:

    “Sieze his passport”
    ???

    What country would take Dick Cheney? Christ, the US is the only safe harbor for him and he’s still only got 18% approval ratings here with a nation that is roughly 50% republican.


  56. Krazny says:

    What country would take Dick Cheney? Christ, the US is the only safe harbor for him and he’s still only got 18% approval ratings here with a nation that is roughly 50% republican.

    Comment by ffakrnull — November 5, 2006 @ 1:24 pm

    Texas


  57. ren says:

    We’ll see after he is arrested…


  58. Bruce Freeman says:

    Cheney is one of those frightening characters that turn up from time to time in history: an insensitive liar, selfish and greedy to the point of being a danger to his fellow man, an arrogant authoritarian who would not hesitate to subjugate those in opposition to his points of view. Cheney IS the model for the word “tyrant.” Cheney (and Bush, and the other neocons) are the likes of which James Madison had in mind when he said: “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” These are our most dangerous times, thanks to Cheney and those like him in power.


  59. cincigal74 says:

    This man is obviously the Antichrist.He will be dealt with by one who is Omnipitent,even over Cheney and Bush.He may decieve a bunch of lame brained hypocrits but there is definately a Higher Power.The Scripture tells that “he will decieve even the very elect”,If this dosent describe Bush and Cheney I dont know who else could come closer.


  60. theswan says:

    There are several countries that would help with his rendition. To name a few, Afganistan, Pakistan, Syria, Egypt, North Korea,China, Russia,Libya, Zimbabwai, Mexico, Canada,South Korea, Vietnam, and a few others. There would actually be plenty of help in this world to loose this creep to whatever fate.


  61. Republicans Are The Fear And Smear Party says:

    “I am in my last throes, if you will.” – Darth Cheney


  62. Ray says:

    Is there any doubt that Cheney is, and will remain, the executive officer of the American branch of the world plutocratic conglomeration? Is there any doubt that he has overseen the hostile takeover of our democracy I.E. the privatization of the electoral process, and the deception of those of faith through equivocation , intimidation, and deceit?
    Is there any doubt that he and his benefactors “namely halliburton and all the other global plutocrats with bloody hands” will benefit financially buy this war of choice, you know, the one that is grinding up Americas most idealistic and brave young people. What is the sum total of all of our loss? the loss of our sovereignty as a nation, our freedom from fear, the exportation of the American dream, the loss of our self-respect in a society that rewards selfishness, greed, and the ability to deceive and control others? Doubt not, this executive officer will never face his sins on this earth, “barring a paradigm shift in power” as long as he continues to deliver our collective ass’ to the world plutocracy he will remain our invisible king. Remember all it takes is 50.1% for business as usual. 2+2=5 proletariat, protest at your own risk. If a world plutocracy can conspire to control the world population, then could not the world population conspire to control the world plutocracy? I submit it must. In this dog eat dog world that the current powers that be have created, we must remember, it is eat or be eaten. Stand, and be counted, or bow, and submit.


  63. Bruce says:

    Cheney is engaging in dangerous brinksmanship with our democracy. Cheney is sending a signal to all those voters intending to vote for Democratic candidates precisely because they believe a Democratically controlled House or Senate will demand BushCheney answer for their incompentent and [arguably] criminal admistration. The message is that any oversight by Congress will be met with extreme resistence. In other words, do not vote for a Democrat unless you want the BushCheney administration to exercise its “nuclear” option resisting any and every subpoena.

    Cheney is playing on voters’ fear of a constitutional crisis for the same reason that Republicans have stoked voters’ fear of a terrorist threat, namely, in order to scare people into submitting to unrestrained Republican rule.

    Nobody wants a constitutional crisis, but Cheney’s threats make clear that we have one. This crisis will not disappear if we pretend it does not exist. If the Democrats gain control of either the House or the Senate, Cheney’s statement should be repeated as evidence of the need to begin investegatory oversight immedieately. Challenging Cheney’s position will be an important first step in reestablishing our constitutional order.

    Along the same lines, if it appears on Wednesday that control of the House or Senate has been stolen by voter suppression or by electronic voter fraud, we need to fight the wrongful results as if our country’s existence depends upon it. Because it does.


  64. gtsagan says:

    Well, at least the little Dick isn’t going to disappoint me by suddenly acting like a real man.


  65. marshall says:

    At some point Americans that voted for Bush/Cheney in 2000 and 2004 have to take responsibility for their choice. We are where we are as a nation due to voter incompetence. When we look at the cost in lives and treasure that the Iraq debacle has cost us, there has to be a flicker of recognition that it wouldn’t have happened but for the voters’ support of Bush/Cheney. When we decry the erosion of Constitutional freedoms under this administration, who do we accuse? Well, who voted for the incompetents that have misled us over the past six years?


  66. gtsagan says:

    Yes, by all means let him keep his passport. We must encourage him to travel to other countries. His colleagues, too.

    Because even if we can’t arrest him and prosecute him for war crimes HERE, under the principle of jus cogens any other nation may arrest him and ship his smirking ass off to the Hague.

    Let’s keep his passport up to date and chain it to his waist.


  67. Bluedog49 says:

    “What country would take Dick Cheney?”

    George Bush recently purchased 98,000 acres in northern Paraguay and the Paraguay government has passed a law saying they can protect people within their borders from the World Court.


  68. Patriot says:

    Please remember time lag between election and inauguration. No matter who wins election, people in power are still in power.


  69. Bluedog49 says:

    Marshall: “At some point Americans that voted for Bush/Cheney in 2000 and 2004 have to take responsibility for their choice.”

    I agree, but remember: at some point our media will have to answer for the pictures they painted. Remember. Bush was authentic, Gore was a phony and a liar. Bush was a hero. Kerry was a creep. These were the scripts of the last two elections. We need to do something about our corporate media.


  70. Nofoolhere says:

    Cheney should consult a few of his right wing Christian fundamentalist fascistic supporters, those who are not caught up in a public display of their perversions, and ask them about the following scripture:

    “Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap” Galatians 6:7, and, ” …be sure your sin will find you out …” Numbers 32:23.


  71. A-Human says:

    We are going to be a police state headed by Dictators/crooks .

    Bush moves toward martial law, revises Insurrection Act with Public Law 109-364

    http://miami.indymedia.org/news/2006/10/6319.php

    None of them will have anything to worry about they will be in control one way or another.


  72. Current Resident says:

    Hold on there you blood thirsty citizens. Before any of this impeach stuff can happen, you first have to win the house and senate. Plain and simple, no win, no impeach. Plain and simple. no paper trail, no win. Plain and simple, Republicans count the votes! No count, no win. All this campaign talk, negative or positive, sorry. The real voters can’t hear any of this stuff, they are machines! Remember 2004, all that talk about impeachment! Back then we tried to hide the cheating. Now, we don’t even have to hide it any more cause everyone is too stupid to do anything about it. Pay no attention to the poles, they’re not even close. Does Mr Bush look worried? No! There you go! And Mr Rove, in case you were wondering, you can fool us once, then fool us again, and then again. And, can be fooled still again! Makes me wonder why we bother with the mess of it all?


  73. Ed Botsko says:

    If he is subpoena-ed and refuses to testify, then he must be held in contempt and incarcerated. He obviously is trying to hide from his high crimes and misdemeanors and is willing to turn his back on the electorate to protect his own flabby, diseased ass.


  74. carollt says:

    Mr. Cheney is a prime example of how absolute power corrupts absolutely.

    History will not be kind to either Dick Cheney or George W. Bush.


  75. danno says:

    Dems don’t have to subpoena Darth. Just throw him in a hole in Gitmo until he sings like a canary. It’s legal now.


  76. wraith says:

    Bush, Cheny and the neocon administration shouldn’t be tried here. They should be marched into the Hague befoer the War Crimes Tribunal. then if they aren’t senticed to death(or life imprisonment) for their crimes, that’s when they should be shipped back to the states to answer on charges of treason against the United States of America. Bush took an oath before hundreds of millions that he would “uphold and defned the Constitution of the United States” He probably added in his mind, “as long as it suits my needs.”


  77. caru says:

    CHENEY IS A KILLER.

    AND THE OTHERS ARE IN ONE HUGE CIRCLE JERK.


  78. caru says:

    CHENEY IS A KILLER.

    THE OTHERS ARE IN ONE HUGE CIRCLE JERKORAMA.


  79. Brendan+O'Maidian says:

    I am so comforted by the knowledge that our true “leader,” Oberfuhrer Cheney exemplifies the truth and fairness doctrines of our nation. That he would not answer a subpoena, proves he has nothing to hide; he is so heroic and courageous that I can’t wait for him to run for president/dictator, and I believe he will, because he is so popular with folks who love to kill and profit from it.
    But first, we need to hone the axe of contrition for him and Unterfuhrer, Bush. Doctor Guillotine would love to participate.


  80. pete says:

    make cheney spend life in prison with his wife as his room mate.
    he would probably hang himself if this happened.


  81. Quadrajet says:

    Hardly a surprise, Cheney also said that it doesn’t matter what congress or the public thinks, it’s ‘full speed ahead’ with the bush ‘plan’ on Iraq whatever the results of the election turn out to be. Who cares if Dick testifies or not, we indict and convict criminals everyday without thier testimony. The only possible benefit in Cheney testifying before congress or anywhere else would be the addition of the inevitable perjury charge(s) that would follow. Although the additional charges would be nice – the more the merrier we’ve got enough on him already.


  82. Andy odonnell says:

    Can congress go after Chaney when he leaves office?


  83. mbhdude says:

    What an arrogant ass. He doesn’t care what the “public” thinks.
    We voted him into his office to represent us.
    He works for the “Public of the United States”


  84. NovaNardis says:

    Didn’t Nixon get impeached for something along those lines? Not respecting Congressional subpoenas?


  85. RUCerious says:

    Open letter to Vice President Cheney

    Don’t try to frighten us with your sorcerer’s ways, Lord Cheney.

    Your sad devotion to that ancient religion neoconism has not helped you

    conjure up a victory in Iraq, or given you clairvoyance enough to find the

    Rebel’s hidden fort…


  86. Gone Green says:

    >>Off subject, but, has anyone thought about the scenario that the GOP >>holds onto its majority? What will we do then?

    Oh that’s easy:

    http://www.californiasecession.org/


  87. nullGarry says:

    Kaneh bosm!!!!!!!


  88. cheryl says:

    This is a perfect example of where these assholes think they are above the law. If the new Congress subpoenas you, you damn well better go!!!! These guys are the biggest crooks that ever walked this planet!!!! If they do get him,they’d better make sure it is under oath too!!!!!! If Congress allows Dick Cheney to call his own shots as to if he shows up or not, they are powerless!!!!!!!


  89. The Mahablog » Duty. Honor. Country. And Dick. says:

    [...] Dick the Dick says veeps don’t respond to congressional subpoenas. [...]


  90. Xenon says:

    Choke on that fat tongue of yours, Dick…everyone else has had to.


  91. Chuck from Missouri says:

    George Bush, Dick Cheney, & Karl Rove are predicting victory for the GOP, only because they want to minimize the Nov. 7th Tidal Wave that America needs. Watching Bush stump for a variety of ethically and morally challenged candidates from his party only reinforces America’s anger. The Bush Team’s incompetent mismanagement in Iraq further reinforces the need for change. The last six years of total Republican control of Legislative and Executive branches have been a disaster for our beloved country. Please consider it your patriotic duty to vote the Republicans out on Tuesday. We cannot afford to allow the national GOP to do any more damage than they have already done.


  92. Vincennes says:

    Cheney: I wll not adhere to any US laws or any laws imposed on me. I will shoot anyone I wish without question or consequence. I will meet with anyone and detain them and waterboard them to my heart’s desire. I will eat as many hamburgers as possible and screw Death. I will shoot Death in the face when I meet him. And then I will go to Heaven and Hell and shoot God and the Devil too. I will become ruler of the entire universe and all of space and time. You will all bow down to me, Emperor Dick.


  93. John Ullmann says:

    Why would he be so openly defiant? Doesn’t he realize that he can be arrested for violations of conflict of interest laws? Look: According to the Vice President’s Federal Financial Disclosure forms, he holds the following Halliburton stock options:
    * 100,000 shares at $54.5000 (vested), expire 12-03-07
    * 33,333 shares at $28.1250 (vested), expire 12-02-08
    * 300,000 shares at $39.5000 (vested), expire 12-02-09
    Why doesn’t he divest?


  94. Steve Phillips says:

    Anybody else going to be imbibing come Tuesday night.
    Bring on the good times…..
    and the hearings nonstop.


  95. Uncle_Ho says:

    #95; You’re talking about conflict of interest laws? John, this Nazi bastard is a MAJOR WAR CRIMINAL!!! He should be hung as such, like his predecessors at Nuremberg.


  96. Uncle_Ho says:

    #88; If the GOP remains in control, then we are truely f*cked.


  97. The Roc says:

    Well, if any of you have ever read the constitution, you’ll see that the President and the other Executive officers are not required to comply to a subpeona by the legislative branch. For people with such strong views on our government, you really don’t have a clue how it works.


  98. david says:

    cheney just knows more than you stupid hippies do, thats why he got to be the vice president. You idiots act like this man is trying to ruin the country or something. Hes knows a million times more about what goes on in this country behind the scenes than any of you do, and the decisions he makes are in our best interest whether you think they are or not


  99. Smarter than you says:

    I am simply astounded at the sheer lack of basic knowledge on the part of most commenting here. Does your blind hate cause your brain to seize? Obnviously the separation of powers doctrine of our government prevents the Congress from simply calling the presnet and or vice-president to testify under oath and attempting to “fry” them. Otherwise wise men like John Conyers and Alcee Hastings would be running the show and we would be in REAL trouble.


  100. Darth Cheney says:

    #87- I find your lack of faith disturbing.


  101. Zooey says:

    #100 – Dad? Is that you?


  102. Billy bo redneck says:

    Send him to Iraq!
    DAVID>>”and the decisions he makes are in our best interest” The rest of the world hates his guts too!!


  103. Vanderbilt says:

    We’ve had enough of people like this guy representing us in washington.


  104. Ken says:

    Impeachment comes first.


  105. Chuck says:

    Only confirms what has been implied 6 years now. If the Supreme Court allows it, that’s the end of this nation. Wasn’t it worth it to make the rich richer?


  106. JoeWo Joe Wosik Blog » Blog Archive » With Liberty and Justice for all says:

    [...] So what if that is a lie?  Justice for some is more like it.  See story here [...]


  107. Uncle_Ho says:

    David; to paraphrase Robert Jackson, the chief prosecuter(Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court) at the Nurmeberg trials, ” They are not on trial for losing the war, but for starting it”.


  108. The MediaBlog says:

    You know, a lot of you people are idiots. Of course he’s not going to testify before Congress under a subpoena. It’s called separation of powers, jerkwads. I’m so conservative I make Trent Lott look like Karl Marx but I wouldn’t have wanted Bubba Clinton to testify before Congress either.

    This is a non-story. Lefties who have zero in the way of a clue are trying to make it sound like a big deal. It just isn’t. It’s a very traditional understanding of the roles of the executive and the legislature.


  109. marshall says:

    What’s an amazing anomaly today is that lower middle-class and poor whites consider themselves to be republicans. That’s political ignorance in one its purest forms. The NRC doesn’t give a shit for anyone unless they contribute large amounts of cash to the party.
    Having three or four junk cars in your yard does not constitute “wealth” in republican circles.


  110. John Deek says:

    hey #99 how many of the nutballs pushing Bush on the rest of us understand the subtle nuances of things like habeas corpus or separation of powers? I’m not sure what you’re implying but if your claiming the lefties are ignorant compared to the osama = saddam, “god made us out of mud 6000 years ago” crowd… well.. thats just silly.


  111. Zolodoco says:

    I think George asked the question because of Ken Starr’s subpoena of President Clinton and Clinton’s response.

    I seriously doubt the House would subpoena Cheney himself, but any evidence related to the leak investigation, war profiteering, mass warrantless invasion of privacy, torture, and starting an illegal war is fair game. That would explain the shredder truck parked outside of his home not too long ago as well as the rush to pass the Military Commisions Act before the elections.


  112. timeisart says:

    These power mad Repug scumballs are going to learn this country has a Constitution even they have to adhere to, in addition to the Geneva accords. See ya in your orange jumpsuits, George, Dick, Donny, Condom.


  113. Goober Pyle says:

    Maybe we should invade Paraguay?


  114. Goober Pyle says:

    Maybe we should invade Paraguay? preemptive like george does.


  115. mikey says:

    Send a nicely armed Platoon of the 82nd Airborne with it’s parent Brigade STANDING BY, to COLLECT FAT ass in Chains and I’m Certain he WILL Testify especially if they DOUBLE TIME his ASS up to the HILL…Dead or Alive !

    AIRBORNE !


  116. nonstory says:

    Woah, did Cheney just refer to himself as the president…and then correct himself?


  117. hughster says:

    Every day these scum remain out of jail is another day the USA’s moral authority goes down the toilet. Living outside the USA, I have made the conscious decision to avoid buying as many American-owned products as possible. I didn’t buy South African things when arpartheid was in force, not do I buy Israeli products (unless it’s from an Israeli friend who does not support the genocidal policy of the Israeli government).

    Why, therefore, should I suppport a “world policeman” that doesn’t even recognize the World Criminal Court, a “defender of liberty” that runs gulags, and a “maintainer of peace” that spends more on killing machines than the rest of the world combined?

    And on that note, it’s only a matter of time before the Asian nations start to break the charmed circle that’s keeping the dollar afloat, refusing to buy any more of the worthless T-bills based on unprecendented debt.


  118. nonstory says:

    Remember when President Ford took office and said “our national nightmare is over”? That’s what I want to hear someone say on Wednesday. America is waking up.


  119. formerrepublican says:

    This chicken hawk draft dodger “Dick” has been terrorizing the american people for years. When are people gonna open their eyes! Dick didn’t learn shit from Nixon and what this administration has done by hijacking americans feelings after 911 to take us on a rollercoaster ride from hell is dispicable…WE THE PEOPLE rule this country Dick all your old PNAC boys are jumping ship and I suggest you do the same. There’s this ethical thing called conflict of interest that you’ve had going on with Halliburton. Not to mention your personal hypocracy as a leader who “had other priorities in the 60’s” yeah like trying to stay out of Vietnam…yet you’re such a great leader with such great courage…give me a break. I suggest you leave before WE THE PEOPLE speak loud and clear, because I don’t think your chickenhawk heart can take it. Sow to the wind and reap the whirlwind baby.


  120. Jericho says:

    oh man, the ccountability!


  121. Jericho says:

    oh man, the accountability!


  122. Tom Murphy says:

    “A fundamental premise of politics is: We can make this work if people just never figure it out.” Former House Majority Leader Dick Armey (R-TX) makes an incredible admission:


  123. Nigel says:

    It would be much better tv if Mrs. Cheney were called to testify re: pornographic literature and her attempt in the 80’s to be a porn queen.


  124. Current Resident says:

    Anyone still keeping score?

    Saddam: In the clubhouse at 128. Next week: “the Noose”
    G.W. 650,000 and still on the course. Next week: “Gets to Walk”


  125. Larry from C says:

    Should Dick Cheney be Waterboarded?

    It’s a No-Brainer!


  126. George "the decider" Bush says:

    get out and vote… it may be your last chance…. my kids are democrats, i offered them a victory dinner after tuesday—- admission “bring your I VOTED stub”

    they make up their own mind in the voting booth, BUT I TAKE CARE TO HELP GET THEM THERE!!!

    step up tomorrow and BRING A FRIEND


  127. tom baker says:

    Lock his wrinkled ass up for contempt – the one quality he has an endless supply of….


  128. Tony Jackson says:

    Why not tie him to a water board and see if he will testify then. He seems to be OK with the use of it on others, see how he likes it and what he has to say then.


  129. Dick Cheney is a dick « The Myriad says:

    [...] Update, 11/6/2006: And because he thinks he’s above the law. [...]


  130. Not So Rich says:

    Oh, he can testify. In chains at the Hague in his war crimes trial. And it is coming, folks, no matter who wins this election.


  131. its about time» Blog Archive » links for 2006-11-05 says:

    [...] Think Progress » Cheney: I Would ‘Probably Not’ Testify Before Congress, Even If Subpoenaed And I don’t think anyone is surprised. Can’t afford to, or just obeying his mum (if you can’t say anything nice…)? Nahhh, he’s just really not wanting reality and the resulting jail time to hit. (tags: america usa president vicepresident cheney law) [...]


  132. cb says:

    Shortly after this question, he started to turn kind of red and started wheezing. It resembled an anxiety attack.


  133. Squidbilly says:

    Let’s get Dick the job as ambassador to Iraq.

    He’d be received with flowers and candy!!!!


  134. Doctress Julia says:

    I like the waterboarding thing, yeah. Then jail (general population, please). Then seize all his assets and put them into something good, like healthcare (e.g. morning after pill and STEM CELL RESEARCH) or education. But, for some reason, I would really get off on slapping him across the face and right out of his chair with a half rancid trout. I dreamt about it and it made me smile.


  135. Tramatized Citizen says:

    Thanks for the info on the bush purchase of Northern Paraquay. (98,000 acres is damn near the entire country). I’ve always known that they would have a spot picked out, preparing for the flee. And, that’s truly what I have been expecting all along. I just didn’t know where. No doubt they can continue to rule the world from there, and safely.

    So, they have roughly two more years, (because they are indeed still in power) to rip off as much as they possibly can in Iraq and around the Middle East, (that would be the OIL) and when the time draws near, they will be gone, taking all of that which they have stolen…with them.


  136. sdemetri says:

    Cheney’s disregard for the separation of powers comes as no surprise. The following link talks about the admins regard for the rule of law:

    http://library.law.pace.edu/blogs/jib/2006/10/when_lawyers_are_war_criminals.html

    It is a speech by Scott Horton speaking at the ASIL Centennial Conference on The Nuremberg War Crimes Trial, Bowling Green, OH Oct 7, 2006. The comparison between Hitler’s call for his lawyers to come up with a means to “disappear” people, the “Night and Fog Decree” (Nacht- und Nebelerlass), and secret renditions under Bush is striking. The Military Tribunals Act essentially granting immunity to the Bush lawyers that wrote the legal opinions justifying torture, secret renditions, detainee policy is such a slap in the face to what the prosecutors at Nuremberg learned, and how they sentenced Hitler lawyers to years in prison for the same or similar opinions found today in Addington’s, Gonzales’s, and Yu’s writings.


  137. makesenseofit says:

    It is a shame that our public officials act the way they do in front of people ..usually these people are prepped before they are exposed to the public.. especially when psyciatric care is needed and not used..
    IF there are any psychologists out there willing to attempt the interpretation of how our president and vice president have shredded the constitution, demoralized the offices they took from the public..
    please step forward ..
    They need your help


  138. Jerry B. Falls says:

    Lest we forget that dumb nuts BUSH deserted his post in time of war, And got away with it! Lest we forget, CHENEY had five deferments during the war in Vietnam and had the audacity to say, I had other priorities.

    Impeach them all!!!!!!

    I do not like to hate, But we have been had by this administration!


  139. bryan j says:

    the president already has all those war time powers he wants.
    he would ignore a democratic congress, and until it went thru the court system(which it wouldnt) he would get away with it. this is the true bush doctorine. a democratic congress would spend AT LEAST 2 years just undoing the laws that gave the executive branch all its power, and by then it would be too late. bush leaves office in 2008, and after that would he be charged with crimes? war crimes? probably not, its unprecedented.


  140. phillyfan says:

    Wait for the next Presidential election, the new democratic president can use the power that chimpy gave him and declare bush and cheney enemy combatants. We will never here from them again. Maybe they can experience some of that non torture we hear so much about


  141. Mr. Evil says:

    Why wait until 2008. Just arrest Cheney now. Waterboard him and make him talk about 9-11 and the real (PNAC) reason we went to war in Iraq.


  142. RickD says:

    Re:110

    “Separation of powers” does not mean “immunity from subpoena”.

    President Clinton was required to testify in the Paula Jones sexual harrassment case. He tried to resist the subpoena, but was smacked down by the Supreme Court. I seem to recall everybody “so conservative to make Trent Lott look like Karl Marx” was howling in derision back then at Clinton’s chutzpah for trying to resist a subpoena.

    The President and Vice President are no more immune to Congressional subpoenas than Congresspeople are immune to being arrested by the FBI. (Except, curiously enough, if they are en route to work, but that exception is explicit in the Constitution.)


  143. zak822 says:

    A late comment, but I’m compelled to say that while President Clinton was not “forced” to testify, can you imagine the reaction from the media if he had not done so?

    There will be no comparable reaction if Bush and Cheney refuse to testify. And that’s the whole story. People on the left truly underestimate the power of TV news.


  144. Watching the Hours Tick By | Election Reporter says:

    [...] Cheney: I Would Probably Not Testify Before Congress, Even If Subpoenaed [...]


  145. The Poor Man Institute » Yay. You winned. says:

    [...] Give Dick a chance to flex, too.   [...]


  146. ExpatLV says:

    Since so many GOPers lost their a—- uh, seats in the November 7th sweep of both houses of Congress by the Dems, it seems obvious to me that a sizeable majority of the nation has seen that the vaunted Republinazi agenda for what it is, a complete and utter failure.

    The PATRIOT Act was a giant step toward fascism, as was the Torture Act signed just weeks ago. The Reeps who were just handed their head on a plate, lameduck though they are, should start NOW to repeal both of the so called ‘Good for America’ travesties of representative democracy.

    The repeal of those two acts should then pave the way to hold Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfewitcz et al accountable for the high crimes and misdemeanors that they perpetrated on the US Citizenry (i.e. the country). Impeach all of them. Convict all of them in Senate. Remove all of them from office. (Okay, Bush already symbolically lopped off Rummy’s head as a sacrificial scapegoat.) Then try all of them in Federal court for treason. Convict them, and send them to prison. And do all this while affording these jackels the rights and privileges that defendants in the US are supposed to have, but don’t be foolish, confiscate their passports. If they flee anyway, try and convict them in absentia, then issue a worldwide warrant for their arrests and extraditions.

    Do all this to send a message to ANY future president be he/she Reep, Dem, Libr, or GDI, that treason will not be tolerated (period).

    Do all this, but not to satisfy a desire to seek vengeance, but instead to bring those criminals to real (not Reep-style) justice.


  147. AP: Cheney to be Called as Defense Witness for Libby :: SOTUblog says:

    [...] Vice President Dick Cheney — willing to testify to save the skin of his crony, but not under any other circumstances. [...]



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll