Think Progress

$250,000.

By Nico Pitney on Nov 7th, 2006 at 5:56 pm

$250,000.

The reward MoveOn is offering for material evidence leading to a felony conviction for an organized effort of partisan voter suppression or electronic voting fraud.



21 Responses to “$250,000.”

  1. chimpeach says:

    There you go, righties. If you can find an example of Dems suppressing the vote, you can claim the pot.

    Good luck.


  2. budpaul says:

    Wow, that’s an impressive number. That damn evil Moveon and Soros! Wait til Bill-O gets his hands on this – he’ll probably wet himself.
    America’s Least Wanted


  3. Jay Randal says:

    I hope someone collects the reward, because massive GOP vote fraud is taking place today nationwide!


  4. unbelievable says:

    How clever! Because there isn’t a neocon breathing who wouldn’t throw his own mother under the bus for a $250,000 reward!


  5. Josh P. says:

    Wow, that’s a lot of money…. I may suppress my own vote for that much. In all seriousness though, I think this is a great idea. If only I could fly down to Virginia real quick, I may have a chance. Go Jim Webb!

    http://www.getsomejosh.com


  6. Lora says:

    They could start with investigating Laura Ingraham.


  7. trueblue says:

    I’ll be in Conn. if you need me!
    :)


  8. Suburban Guerrilla » $250,000 says:

    [...] conviction for an organized effort of partisan voter suppression or electronic voting fraud. Permalink| [...]


  9. Mongo says:

    Just wondering: will this apply to partisan suppression by dems as well as repubs?

    Just thinking about kean’s allegations.


  10. El Tonno says:

    > How clever! Because there isn’t a neocon breathing who wouldn’t
    > throw his own mother under the bus for a $250,000 reward!

    Public transport might grind to a halt!!

    Robocalling… big in the UK:

    http://www.theregister.com/2006/11/07/us_election_robocalling/

    I hope someone is hauled to club fed over this.


  11. Phil Lindsey says:

    I want first dibs on the quarter million if we can put Election Director, Rich Chrismer, of St. Charles, Missouri in the penitentiary.

    I have what evidence we have now safely salte away. But, as I type, he is sitting there in St. Charles, directing the counting of 240,000 votes entirely out of the sight of a SINGLE PAIR OF DEMOCRATIC EYES!!

    Phil Lindsey

    PS. To make it simple, he is stealing the election from McCaskill and giving it to incumbent James talent.

    PPS. It’s one of the SIX critical states!!


  12. El Tonno says:

    Just wondering: will this apply to partisan suppression by dems as well as repubs?

    That would only be fair. Will it?


  13. Bluedog49 says:

    Kean’s charges involve the vandalizing of his campaign office the night before the election. That certainly doesn’t qualify as “electronic voter fraud.” Maybe vote suppression, but I’m not sure about that. At any rate, all voting irregularities should be investigated.


  14. Republicans are the fear and smear party says:

    This is great! Republicans are so greedy they’ll be turning each other in.


  15. mighty aphrodite says:

    How exciting!! I think the Menendez “loaded” machines in New Jersey might qualify for the reward!!
    P.S. LOVED the exit poll info, TP. I guess those reliable exit polls missed the part about John Kerry winning the Presidency……

    Happy election day(s)…..


  16. Pissed Off says:

    TO ALL GOPers

    Time has come for you to act. Turn in Karl “The Himler Garden Gnome” Rove


  17. ggibson says:

    Thats why I have donated money to MoveOn several times this year and last year. They DO SOMETHING. Them and the ACLU. If the democrats would only learn from their example.


  18. Bluedog49 says:

    Mighty A: “I guess those reliable exit polls missed the part about John Kerry winning the Presidency…”

    The first precint by precint numbers, before they were “cooked” by Mitkofsky, had Kerry beating Bush by 11.7%. Our State Department protested the results of the election in the Ukraine the same year because of a 5% difference. The vast majority of statisticians and polling experts will tell you that exit polls are, by far, historically the most accurate of polls.


  19. Bluedog49 says:

    Sorry about the word “precinct.” Brain-lock.


  20. wisedup says:

    You can keep the money, her name is : Laura Ingraham, charge: ‘Inciting people to jam voting fraud reporting phone lines.’ FCC rules forbid this.


  21. chimpeach says:

    #15 MA

    How exciting!! I think the Menendez “loaded” machines in New Jersey might qualify for the reward!!

    Prove it or shut your piehole.

    P.S. LOVED the exit poll info, TP. I guess those reliable exit polls missed the part about John Kerry winning the Presidency……

    The exit polls were reliable…until the ever-so-ethical GOP pollworkers of Ohio discarded all the “spoiled” ballots. Oh well, it was only about 3 million votes that never got cast. No big.



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll