“I’m worried about bloggers,”
By on Nov 13th, 2006 at 5:37 pm
“I’m worried about bloggers,”
says former New York Times reporter Judith Miller. “(A post) starts as a rumor and within 24 hours it’s repeated as fact.” Miller said blogs “don’t post corrections when they learn that what they have posted is wrong,” but added that she was “glad to welcome them as long as they agree to the standards.” When not helping blogs improve their correction standards, Miller peddled false intelligence from the White House and Iraqi exile Ahmad Chalabi that helped convince Americans that Iraq had WMD.
View Most Popular
Advertisement
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
Reports
In depth studies on select topics
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Afghanistan
Bailout
Big Oil
Bolton
Bush
Cheney
Civil Rights
Congress
Earmarks
Economy
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Global Warming
Guantanamo
Health Care
Immigration
International Relations
Iran
Iraq
Justice
Kristol
LGBT
Lieberman
McCain
McClellan
Media
Military
O'Reilly
Obama
Palin
Politics
Race
Radical Right
Religion
Rice
RNC Convention
Rove
Terrorism
Third Bush Term
Torture
Veterans
Wiretapping
Women's Rights
ArchivesBlog Roll
Yeah. Judy is THE source for information you can trust…
November 13th, 2006 at 5:42 pmAnother self-serving gas bag serving patronization and condescention… Sheesh!.
Go bye-bye now Judy. Your fifteen minutes was over a long time ago.
November 13th, 2006 at 5:42 pmYeah lots of folks just like Judy are worried about bloggers. Fast, truthful information before the MSM can spin it out of control. All lying, cheating, subversive types should worry about bloggers.
November 13th, 2006 at 5:42 pmim glad she’s getting on the case of the network news stations like fox and all the other tabloid tv news programs. they correct lots of their mistakes. (lots of sarcasm).
November 13th, 2006 at 5:45 pmI still haven’t read “Germs” yet Judy.
November 13th, 2006 at 5:46 pmI think all the media get down on the “bloggers” because their news doesnt always cut it and spends too much time selling out to their sponsors. In my opinion, The online news revolution is just the free market starting to erode the “news” outlets that no longer report all the news.
November 13th, 2006 at 5:48 pmJudy, look in the mirror and say “pot meet kettle”, You lying, sorry, neocon excuse of a reporter.
November 13th, 2006 at 5:48 pmThey are worried because most of the time bloggers get the news out faster. Newspapers dont always print retractions either so that argument does not fly.
Sucks to see your business model become archaic.
November 13th, 2006 at 5:49 pmMiller said blogs “don’t post corrections when they learn that what they have posted is wrong,†- - Irony is so … ironic, eh?
November 13th, 2006 at 5:50 pmSeems like the Pot calling the Kettle black…
November 13th, 2006 at 5:50 pmHmm, lies being reported as truth? That sounds a little bit like our goose-stepping corporate media parrotting Bush lies, Cheney lies, Rumsfeld lies and Cunning Rice lies as the gospel truth for the last six long miserable years of neo-fascistic corporate tyranny… Of course, this is just one man’s unhumble opinion, posted as comment on a progressive web site, ThinkProgress, on the Internets…
Actually, the Internet and a few progressive newspapers and magazines are virtually the only places that you may find anything even remotely resembling “the truth.”
As always,
November 13th, 2006 at 5:53 pmCheers.
“I’m worried about bloggers.”
said the war criminal.
November 13th, 2006 at 5:53 pmP. S. Judith Miller is a worthless treasonous bitch, who along with her corporate NY Times, have been cheerleaders for this stupid war on Iraq. The blood is on your hands, you war criminal…
Cheers.
November 13th, 2006 at 5:55 pmHow ironic. I worry about the so-called “news” media.
November 13th, 2006 at 5:55 pmIf I was Judy Miller, I would not discuss thruning rumors into facts, nor question somebody eles’s ethics too loudly…
And as far as standards go, if you lied about WMD’s …STFU while people are still DYING.
November 13th, 2006 at 5:55 pmShe’s worried about rumors? Like rumors about maybe WMD’s are under the table?
November 13th, 2006 at 5:55 pmOr that she’s a sellout whore?
There’s a rumor!
#14, damn, you took my comment! :-)
November 13th, 2006 at 5:58 pmWhile she advocates a federal shield law to protect mainstream journalists from divulging their sources, she doesn’t favor extending that to bloggers who don’t follow the standards and ethnics of the journalism industry.
“Standards and ethics of the journalism industry” - like the single-sourcing of stories, demanding exclusivity to classified information, and pushing INC propaganda as fact? Her journalism professors must be so proud that she refers to their profession as an industry, meaning it is primarily interested in pushing product, not informing the citizenry.
November 13th, 2006 at 6:04 pmJudy got the story wrong on WMD, but she DID go to prison to protect her source. In other words, she made mistakes but she has integrity.
That said, I think that blogs provide a source of information…and readers need to be equally vigilant in judging sources of information, whether it’s a blog or the main stream media…
I disagree with Judy on this, but I think it’s just wrong to call her a “sellout whore” and such. (not to mention unnecessarily rude). The mistakes she made on her WMD stories were bad, but they weren’t the only stories of her career.
November 13th, 2006 at 6:04 pmthanks, judy you miserable filthy swine, my blog about you has been lonely and now i have a new post to do…
November 13th, 2006 at 6:05 pmWell, I’m worried about some who call themselves journalists, Judy. Gimme a break with the projection crap. A (post) starts as a rumor and within 24 hours it’s repeated as fact.†Miller said blogs “don’t post corrections when they learn that what they have posted is wrong,†She’s talking about Drudge here, ya know.
Like ya say, keep in perspective: When not helping blogs improve their correction standards, Miller peddled false intelligence from the White House and Iraqi exile Ahmad Chalabi that helped convince Americans that Iraq had WMD.
November 13th, 2006 at 6:06 pmthey’re all losers
November 13th, 2006 at 6:06 pmIsn’t she a couple of quarts low on credibility to be smearing the blogs?
November 13th, 2006 at 6:07 pmPubs,
November 13th, 2006 at 6:17 pmDuring the winter of 2001 and throughout 2002, Miller produced a series of stunning stories about Saddam Hussein’s ambition and capacity to produce weapons of mass destruction, based largely on information provided by Chalabi and his allies—almost all of which have turned out to be stunningly inaccurate.
Ms. Miller’s flawed reporting was one reason this country was suckered into the Iraq war and occupation. I think it is not the least bit rude to call her a whore, in the sense that she sold her “story” to gain access to the circle of power. Nor do I give half a shit about being rude.
But thanks for pointing that out!
Not completely off-topic since Judy’s help in starting the war in Iraq helped lead to the official death of habeas corpus..
November 13th, 2006 at 6:30 pmSTFU Mediawhore
November 13th, 2006 at 6:31 pmWhat a she-troll…
“Can trolls survive in snow domes? (blogs). A university study says yes, ‘under certain conditions’ ”
http://www.hyperrealpolitik.blogspot.com
November 13th, 2006 at 6:34 pmI’ll repeat my FDL post:
Judith Miller lecturing bloggers on journalistic ethics is like Jeffrey Dahmer chastising Julia Childs on poor menu choices.
-GSD
November 13th, 2006 at 6:35 pmShe reminds me, yesterday at the store…’National Enquirer’..front page said ‘Katy Coric…FIRED’….bla bla bla……oh well, we can ‘wish’..lolol.
November 13th, 2006 at 6:43 pmScooter-banging sycophant. A special circle for you and your ilk, Ms. Miller.
November 13th, 2006 at 6:44 pmahhh, this explains why she is coming out from under her rock and sounding all ‘journalistic’ and wise…
good ol’ judy finally testified in chicago about the torture she witnessed at the hands of the israelis against an american…
November 13th, 2006 at 6:48 pmKnee pad Judy has a reputation that prevents all from taking her seriously.
November 13th, 2006 at 6:50 pmJudith Miller, concerned about facts and accuracy? Lecturing others on posting corrections when errors are found?
Or maybe Ms Miller is counting on us having a very short memory span.
What a joke…
November 13th, 2006 at 6:53 pmBloggers who don’t admit their errors should be exposed, but noted journalists employed by the most prestigious newspaper in the country shouldn’t have to admit they were wrong — is that it, Judy?
November 13th, 2006 at 6:56 pmBloggers have broken news stories, and debunked news stories, and they have become a force in communication — MSM and Miller might want to re-evaluate.
you know i wish that someone would ask good ol’ judith ‘massad’ miller what david kelly meant went he sent an email to her hours before his being murdered that said,
there have been so much death in this administration that i know it is hard to remember them all, but david kelly/em> is a gentleman that the british murdered
November 13th, 2006 at 6:57 pmI’m more worried about Judith Millers than she is about bloggers…and don’t get me started on the Novaks…..
November 13th, 2006 at 7:01 pmGood thing those smelly bloggers will never get to read this little artic….HEY!
Us plebeians should mind our place.
November 13th, 2006 at 7:01 pmHow interesting that someone alleged to be a Mossad asset helped to push the lie that led to attacking Iraq and thereby removing one of Israel’s enemies.
November 13th, 2006 at 7:03 pmthis is actually a retread of her old argument where she blamed bloogers for her downfall several months ago in slate…
this woman is truly bad news and a member in good standing of the bush crime family and, probably, the massad…
November 13th, 2006 at 7:08 pmPot, meet Kettle.
This looks like good Daily Show fodder.
November 13th, 2006 at 7:10 pmyes, tsold, isn’t it :) please look at the link i have in #32 regarding the israeli torture of an american, while good ol’ judy just happened to be in the room…
but, soon the trolls will be and will call you a rabid anti-semite for drawing any conclusion that involves israel and the bush crime family…warning!!! it just isn’t ‘polite’ to draw conclusions where country x is concerned…
November 13th, 2006 at 7:12 pmMiller was one of the Cheney Administration’s main propagandists in the run-up to the war.
Did she once, up to this very minute, issue a correction?
Don’t go away angry, just GO AWAY!
And please quit providing the Reactionaries with talking points.
November 13th, 2006 at 7:13 pmfor those interested in our ms miller’s handiwork for the enemy, here is a link to an excellent short piece in the dailykos from july 2005.
November 13th, 2006 at 7:28 pmOf course she’s worried. She’s part of the right wing mainstream media that caters to the terrorists, traitors, and core corporate fraud, and web sites are vastly more accurate, vastly more timely, and vastly more legitimate than any “news” that her and he fellow obsolete dinosaurs have put out in the past 20, 30 years.
The mainstream media has been in their death throes for a decade now, watching as the low IQ of the American populace continues to decline and as the number of Americans capable of reading declines with them.
The result has been a shift from print media to the brainless television media, split with people who still retain some intelligence looking toward the Internet for some TRUTH, finally.
The blogs have the added attraction of being capable of immediate rebuttle and immediate confirmation. They’re also capable of immediately exposing rightard traitor lies and treason — something that’s harder to do when FOX “News” commits their crimes against America nightly.
My opinions only and only my opinions.
November 13th, 2006 at 7:44 pmWhy should we listen to her. She fuelled most of the false “facts” to the NY Times.
Oops, don’t tell Dead eye Dick Cheney though, he might have to retract his anti-NY Times newspeak.
Maybe when hell freezes over……
November 13th, 2006 at 7:48 pmHello, Kettle? My name is pot; nice to meet you.
November 13th, 2006 at 7:49 pmAmerica’s Least Wanted
we must look at the bigger picture here. the enemy has noted that there is power in blogging and they must kill it to control it. they are trotting out this old woman, not for the reasons expressed in the think progress link to her speech, but, the crime family is putting her out there for this:
the bush crime family is going to start prosecuting bloogers, absent the federal shield law… this will chill speech on the internet, and will shift speech to those with power and away from us.
this woman only comes out her beautiful noho apartment to do the handiwork of the enemy…
November 13th, 2006 at 7:52 pmRemember Gannon?
And who could forget Bush’s gay male hooker pretending to be a journalist? That news was discovered and reported by bloggers who them dug and did the core research on the story.
It took the mainstream media a month to catch on and realize that they had all be scooped on a major, massive story of epic hokum being perped by the Bush regime. And even after “Gannon” had been massively exposed, much of the mainstream media still refused to carry the story.
Someone who checks in to George W. Bush’s bedroom at night on numerous occasions and doesn’t leave until morning is a major story — more so when Bush is part of the hate filled Christian cult who demonizes gays.
November 13th, 2006 at 7:54 pmGood point. Miller NEVER issued a correction, at least never one that sufficed for the lethal disinformation she spread.
Her hypocrisy is breathtaking.
Additionally, there is, generally speaking, a marked distinction between progressive and right-wing bloggers, of which she makes none. On the whole, progressive bloggers write opinions and promulgate information that is based on fact, even if, yes, it supports their ideology - one that embraces human rights, the rule of law and common sense. While the vast majority of right-wing bloggers write opinions and promulgate information that is based almost completely on ideology - one unconcerned with human rights, the rule of law and common sense - that blithely eschews facts.
Such distinctions are critical. It’s time “liberal” journalists like Miller stop throwing the blogger out with the bathwater. Just like mainstream journalists, some bloggers are more responsible and professional than others. A truism of any profession or vocation. Often times it is the singer and not the song.
Judith Miller, a former participant in WHIG (the White House Iraq Group, which sought ways to sell the Iraq invasion to U.S. citizens and the world) has already proven her implacable remorselessness at advertising - in the guise of journalism - this administration’s war propaganda. With this statement on bloggers, she underscores either her ignorance of what is happening in the blogosphere or her antipathy towards those blogging participants, myself included, who helped to expose her egregious reporting on WMD in Iraq.
Meanwhile, Miller should be thankful that any self-respecting newspaper would hire her after her disgraceful pre-invasion reports.
November 13th, 2006 at 7:57 pmWTF?! Judy you are one, arrogant, major LIAR!!! How dare you place blame on bloggers-YOU’RE the lazy ass that got caught! Go Away!!!
November 13th, 2006 at 7:58 pmIs she journalism’s Joe Liberman? Anoited and mis-understood but still around because everyone needs her.
November 13th, 2006 at 8:05 pmSo now the Blogosphere… is the ‘liberal echo chamber’?
Who knew watching the Neo Cons go down in flames would be so funny?
November 13th, 2006 at 8:19 pmBlogs are simply independent individuals expressing their beliefs. Reporters are “supposed to” relate authentic news; after all, they’re getting paid as professionals. The Foley case is a case in point where a blogger broke the story which was absolutely accurate, as it turned out. Without the blogs and the intimindation of the MSM, news about a predator like Foley would probably never be discovered…..and when it was, it would be shoved under the nearest carpet, just as it was by Hastert et al years ago. Bravo for the blogs!
November 13th, 2006 at 8:28 pmMiller = Plamegate….a connection which will her legacy.
November 13th, 2006 at 8:30 pmHyp meet Crit
November 13th, 2006 at 8:31 pmScooter; “Judy?”
Judy; “Speaking”
Scooter; “Armageddon will start in 2007″
Judy; “Really?”
Scooter; “Yes, really I have the proof right here”
Judy; “Wow, I’ll be famous!”
Scooter; “Yes you will.”
Judy; “Thanks soooo much!!”
Judy; [yells to edito] “STOP THE PRESSES! I have the TRUTH!!”
November 13th, 2006 at 8:40 pmThey runnin’ scared…ha!!! It is precisely the reaction we should hope to see. This new exchange of ideas and information, is exactly the antidote we need for the Orwellian Dystopia. The shrill bleating of oldschool shills like Judith Miller is the proof.
However, if you take a second look at what she is saying, one could make a case that some reich-wing fear-monger could create a panic, much like Welles’ Invasion from Mars. However, we already stopped the Binary Bomb Scare dead in it’s tracks, within hours of it’s release, and the illegal and unconstitutional MCA and JWDAA acts were brought into the light despite intense efforts at official secrecy. Given these most recent successes, along with many more, I’d say that the new system is already working pretty well, much better in fact than the system it has replaced.
November 13th, 2006 at 8:41 pmWait a minute, wait a minute… This is Judith Miller saying this?
Drumbeater Judy?
Judy “Iraq Has WMD’s” Miller?
Is she even remotely capable of irony?
Just up: Democratic Diversity: A Curse in Disguise? Will the Democrats rise above their differences or fall victim to it like the GOP’s did?
November 13th, 2006 at 8:51 pmthe bush crime family is going to start prosecuting bloggers [corr], absent the federal shield law… this will chill speech on the internet, and will shift speech to those with power and away from us. - James Risser
Yes, that is possible. Some of us have not quite come to the realization that we are already engaged in the latest outbreak of the American Civil War, a conflict that was never finished. And I do not mean this in any metaphorical sense whatsoever. There may be many more domestic prisoners before we can oust this junta. If that is the case, then we go to the next level of engagement, just as we have always done.
“Freedom is just another word for nothin’ left to lose” — Janice Joplin
And JP, a lot of that “rising above their differences” depends on gaining this understanding that we are engaged in a very real war. There is much more to be said in this regard…
November 13th, 2006 at 9:13 pmwanna REALLY get your blood boiling?
November 13th, 2006 at 9:44 pmcheck out the newt post at crooks and liars… talk about hipocrites…
thing is, we just have to wait, not stoop to those criminal’s level…
the dem congress has yet to be sworn in… justice WILL prevail…
…the bush crime family is going to start prosecuting bloogers…
Comment by james risser — November 13, 2006 @ 7:52 pm
wouldn’t surprise me… but what would be easier is taking away NET NEUTRALITY… gotta keep on top of that too… it sure worries me…
November 13th, 2006 at 9:47 pm.
Dear Judy,
Following up a front-page headline piece with an apology on page A-16 does not classify as a “correction” in my book. I call it manipulation on a grand scale.
What you don’t like about bloggers is what you hate about yourself the worst. Good luck with it. :-)
November 13th, 2006 at 9:49 pmYeah yeah, slander us all you want. But you know what, we not only post the facts, we LINK to the facts.
November 13th, 2006 at 9:55 pmJudith Miller, after two weeks of negotiations, on November 9, 2005, ended her 28-year career with the New York Times.
Miller played a key role in promoting both U.S. wars against Iraq. In 2004 it was revealed that she was one of the reporters informed by a White House official that Valerie Plame was an undercover CIA agent.
November 13th, 2006 at 9:59 pmThey might try to clamp down on internet bloggers but it would be easier to control the data thats released.
The grapevine is more valuable, I think, as a tool to spread what carefully picked data is released. I mean, thats what I would do, leave the vines ‘roots’ intact and control the amount of kool-aid it gets, instead of cutting off the roots and killing the grapevine.
November 13th, 2006 at 10:33 pmAnother meaningless ethics lecture from the unprincipled right. Next thing you know they’ll trot out NEWT GINGRICH as a presidential candidate.
November 13th, 2006 at 10:41 pmFrom corporate media TRAITOR to concern troll in five bloody years.
In an earlier age, she would be burned in effigy or ridden around on a rail covered in tar and feathers.
Instead, she’s just so concerned. Wah!
Who knew she was such a (rightwing parody of a) “liberal.”
November 13th, 2006 at 11:11 pmWhen Judy speaks, all I hear is FARTING sounds.
November 13th, 2006 at 11:30 pmJudy, Judy, Judy. [sigh]
November 13th, 2006 at 11:58 pmFrom the article cited:
“Miller said the American media, however, give the federal government reason to doubt its motives and competence each time it is discovered that an article is plagiarized or gossip is reported as fact.”
OK, cards are on the table. The federal government (who are we talking about here?) is now in the position of questioning the motives and competence of the press. This is great theatre. Regulate your competition, except your bosses. One in the same, except for those pesky unprofessional bloggers. Eat it up America, until you’ve had your fill.
November 14th, 2006 at 12:16 amJudith Miller, gov’t employee. She flipped the terms of her argument. Here’s the correct form:
“The federal government, however, give the American population reason to doubt its motives and competence each time it is discovered that it has presented lies as fact.â€
Judy lied, for traitors–because she is one herself.
She thinks she works for the CIA, and that her job at the NYT was just a front. After all, she has a Superman suit in her closet.
Too bad the Superman suit in the Shitehouse is just a front, and Americans found out, because the blogs broke the circle of propaganda using that damn internets.
November 14th, 2006 at 1:01 amDid she mention the Drudge Report, you know, the one that EVERY newsman in America refers to first?
November 14th, 2006 at 1:13 amJudith’s Hypocrisy
She is so worried about bloggers correction on their mistakes and standards . She herself covered up and served as the mouthpiece of this Administration in spreading out lies and deception of the intelligence invading Iraq causing the death of almost 3000 americans
November 14th, 2006 at 4:54 amand wounding some 20,000 sons and daughters in that stupid war.
BAKER’S STUDY GROUP IS SORE TO FAIL.
While this group is composed of retired American luminaries of generally civilian in nature, except Mr. Perry, is a face saving strategy for this Administration and the new Congress to get out of Iraq.
There is no new idea that they can offer. It’s all in the market of ideas, the fact remains that the American people voted that we should get out from Iraq.
Let the great people of Iraq fight among themselves and ultimately they will come to terms to negotiate for truce and peace.
Disregarding Syria and Iran in whatever recommendations of the Bakers Study Group is a recepi for failure.
November 14th, 2006 at 5:02 amI don’t think that “Judith Miller” and “journalist” fit in the same sentence together. Isn’t this a “pot calling the kettle black” moment?
November 14th, 2006 at 7:23 amI just finished reading Hubris. Absent were any indications that bloggers were responsible for lying to make a case to start a war, but there were many pages that Judy Kneepads did. The woman is absolutely shameless, and needs to shut her pie hole.
November 14th, 2006 at 8:28 amScrub your hands all you try, Lady Judith Miller McBeth, but you can’t wash away the bloodstains on them from more than 2,800 troops killed in a needless war you encouraged this McBethian administration to prosecute. It is bloggers who are casting light on your deeds, which will remain in journalism’s hall of infamy.
November 14th, 2006 at 8:45 amBTW, I wonder what “standards” Miller used when she wrote her stories trumpeting the presence of WMDs?
November 14th, 2006 at 8:47 amGo back to jail traitor.
November 14th, 2006 at 9:04 amThis is about containing the information explosion on Thuh Innernets. There is a movement afoot to contain it as its clearly working against their agenda. I predict Bush will attempt to make some profound changes to access to information before his term is up, in the interest of national security. Like an economic barrier such as converting the web to an information super-toll-highway. I see this crap from JM as laying the groundwork for the above strategy. BTW, anyone noticed how much CNN is spending to promote Glenn Beck this of late? Scary. And of course there is the lovely and talented Nancy Grace who consumes the prime hour on CNN Headline News Trailer Park Edition nightly. Obviously pandering to Liberals there. Not.
November 14th, 2006 at 9:40 amThis is about containing the information explosion on Thuh Innernets. There is a movement afoot to contain it as its clearly working against their agenda…
agreed… we need to work for NET NEUTRALITY…
…anyone noticed how much CNN is spending to promote Glenn Beck this of late? Scary…
Comment by Gord Metcalfe — November 14, 2006 @ 9:40 am
very scary… i hear his latest promo on my xm-airamericaradio… i thought he was referring to jesus camp at first…
November 14th, 2006 at 9:55 am.
Judy, Judy, Judy, Kansas needs you more.
November 14th, 2006 at 10:02 amJudith Miller is obviously a sociopath. She will never admit to being wrong, it’s always the other guy’s fault. Reminder you of anyone?
November 14th, 2006 at 10:21 amJudy got the story wrong on WMD, but she DID go to prison to protect her source. In other words, she made mistakes but she has integrity.
No, dear; she went to prison to protect government officials who outed a NOC CIA agent. There’s a difference.
Speaking as a working journalist (that is, someone who pursues facts instead of govt. propaganda): Judy, when we want want your advice, we’ll beat it out of you. ‘Til then? Just. Shut. Up. Our jobs are hard enough as it is.
November 14th, 2006 at 10:41 amIs this the same Judy Miller portrayed by Gilda Radner on SNL all those years ago jumping up and down on the bed, singing and babbling in “The Judy Miller Show”?
Oh, and by the way, write and phone your congressmen and encourage them to reinstate the Fairness Doctrine. This will put a clamp on her kind and drive the likes of Limbaugh, Hannity and Mr. Coulter into unemployment.
November 14th, 2006 at 10:42 amI’m worried about Judith Miller. She apparently intends to stand in the middle of a stampede and pretend it’s not happening. That would be another good definition of insane. Smile Judy, here come the bulls.
November 14th, 2006 at 11:18 amJudith Miller complaining about bloggers and innacurate information is hysterical comedy. It makes about as much sense as if Pamela Anderson made an announcement that there is too much sex on television that is leading our young people astray.
Lets get realistic. Judith Miller is a propagandist, not a journalist.
November 14th, 2006 at 11:45 amI think Miller is trying to do a good job of making the populace THINK. Keep it up;we don’t have to buy Millers’s opinions.
November 14th, 2006 at 12:03 pmWell…well…well. So the republicans are admitting that bloggers are making an impact on the corruption in their party….next thing they will be pushing for the ownership of the whole damn internet by the republicans. We have to make sure the internet remains neutral. That’s the only way during the last election that pertinent truthful information about the republicans was available.
November 14th, 2006 at 12:42 pm[…] November 14, 2006Judith “No WMDs” Miller, a Nervous Blogger “I’m worried about bloggers,†says former New York Times reporter Judith Miller. “(A post) starts as a rumor and within 24 hours it’s repeated as fact.†Miller said blogs “don’t post corrections when they learn that what they have posted is wrong,†but added that she was “glad to welcome them as long as they agree to the standards.†When not helping blogs improve their correction standards, Miller peddled false intelligence from the White House and Iraqi exile Ahmad Chalabi that helped convince Americans that Iraq had WMD.” read the comments, they are hysterical: ThinkProgress.org […]
November 14th, 2006 at 12:49 pm[…] Thanks to the writers at Think Progess, I came across this brilliant quote from former New York Times reporter Judith Miller, who said (during a speech at Kansas State University) about bloggers: “(A post) starts as a rumor and within 24 hours it’s repeated as fact.†Miller said blogs “don’t post corrections when they learn that what they have posted is wrong,†but added that she was “glad to welcome them as long as they agree to the standards.†[…]
November 14th, 2006 at 3:37 pmWho’s Judy?
Isn’t she the one who outed Valerie Palme?
Oh wait, silly me, she’s the whore hired by the White House to have UGLY SEX with cheney’s former chief of staff? What was his name?
hmm..
November 14th, 2006 at 4:03 pmhttp://aliberaldose.blogspot.com/2005/10/judy-judy-judy.html
November 14th, 2006 at 5:06 pm2836 + Dead Soldiers Ago, Miller-Lite Could Have Cared Less About Factual Content. Now, She’s Doing A Preacher Ted Imitation?
Miller-Lite listened to an embezzler, convicted felons and an Unelected, Unimpeached Bush and had no problem stenographing the Pentagon Line. She also lied about the discovery of a mobile weapons lab, the operations of the troops in Iraq and outed a CIA Officer. No one took her for her word before she was fired, why should anyone believe her now?
November 14th, 2006 at 7:48 pmJudith judith judith, just look at the facts of your past being presented here. Of course you’re worried about blogs. And with good reason. But we will never forget.
November 15th, 2006 at 12:21 am[…] Source: Think Progress Posted by Michael Kolanos Filed in Censorship […]
November 15th, 2006 at 10:07 pmWilliam
Freeeeedom!
March 17th, 2008 at 6:35 pmCarpet lover
I never knew that this was the case, some searching on Google showed me you where right, thanks for the post.
March 26th, 2008 at 11:28 pmmars advertising
I want to know more about this deal, can any one offer? Thanks
April 6th, 2008 at 2:32 amCracks House
I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view
April 6th, 2008 at 12:23 pmFriend of the Rugs
April 11th, 2008 at 10:31 am