Comments on: Dana Priest: Washington Post Avoids ‘Civil War’ Language Because Iraqi Gov’t Does Not Use It http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/ Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:13:01 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Ass Tight Ass Ass Worship http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/comment-page-4/#comment-4630876 Ass Tight Ass Ass Worship Sun, 30 Mar 2008 04:54:19 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/#comment-4630876 <strong>Ass Tight Ass Ass Worship</strong> I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view Ass Tight Ass Ass Worship

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

]]> By: Cock Mommy Loves Cock Cocks http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/comment-page-4/#comment-4593052 Cock Mommy Loves Cock Cocks Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:21:02 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/#comment-4593052 <strong>Cock Mommy Loves Cock Cocks</strong> I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view Cock Mommy Loves Cock Cocks

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

]]> By: Cock Dog Dick In Pussy Sucking Dick http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/comment-page-4/#comment-4587192 Cock Dog Dick In Pussy Sucking Dick Fri, 28 Mar 2008 06:22:37 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/#comment-4587192 <strong>Cock Dog Dick In Pussy Sucking Dick</strong> I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view Cock Dog Dick In Pussy Sucking Dick

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

]]> By: Sex Girls Having Sex Rough Sex http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/comment-page-4/#comment-4488902 Sex Girls Having Sex Rough Sex Tue, 25 Mar 2008 22:22:51 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/#comment-4488902 <strong>Sex Girls Having Sex Rough Sex</strong> I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view Sex Girls Having Sex Rough Sex

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

]]> By: Gay Incest Gay Cumshots Gay Jock http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/comment-page-3/#comment-4405088 Gay Incest Gay Cumshots Gay Jock Sat, 22 Mar 2008 04:52:11 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/#comment-4405088 <strong>Gay Incest Gay Cumshots Gay Jock</strong> I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view Gay Incest Gay Cumshots Gay Jock

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

]]> By: Vella http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/comment-page-3/#comment-4402074 Vella Sat, 22 Mar 2008 02:20:45 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/#comment-4402074 <strong>Vella</strong> I have become my own version of an optimist. If I can't make it through one door, I'll go through another door - or I'll make a door. Something terrific will come no matter how dark the present. Vella

I have become my own version of an optimist. If I can’t make it through one door, I’ll go through another door – or I’ll make a door. Something terrific will come no matter how dark the present.

]]> By: Eric http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/comment-page-3/#comment-4341270 Eric Wed, 19 Mar 2008 02:42:58 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/#comment-4341270 <strong>Eric</strong> I Googled for something completely different, but found your page...and have to say thanks. nice read. Eric

I Googled for something completely different, but found your page…and have to say thanks. nice read.

]]> By: Cock Very Young Boy Cock Small Cock http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/comment-page-3/#comment-4321488 Cock Very Young Boy Cock Small Cock Mon, 17 Mar 2008 08:30:02 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/#comment-4321488 <strong>Cock Very Young Boy Cock Small Cock</strong> I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view Cock Very Young Boy Cock Small Cock

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

]]> By: Young Girls Young Girl Models Young Puffy Nipple http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/comment-page-3/#comment-4311074 Young Girls Young Girl Models Young Puffy Nipple Sun, 16 Mar 2008 02:23:46 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/#comment-4311074 <strong>Young Girls Young Girl Models Young Puffy Nipple</strong> I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view Young Girls Young Girl Models Young Puffy Nipple

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

]]> By: Cock Massive Cocks Cumshots Big Gay Cock http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/comment-page-3/#comment-4301712 Cock Massive Cocks Cumshots Big Gay Cock Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:15:20 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/#comment-4301712 <strong>Cock Massive Cocks Cumshots Big Gay Cock</strong> I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view Cock Massive Cocks Cumshots Big Gay Cock

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

]]> By: Leonard Peracchio http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/comment-page-3/#comment-1830563 Leonard Peracchio Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:46:59 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/#comment-1830563 Matthews and Pries.. Two Biased non jornalists looking to sound smart??/ NOT! Matthews and Pries.. Two Biased non jornalists looking to sound smart??/ NOT!

]]> By: george has no BUSH http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/comment-page-3/#comment-1431993 george has no BUSH Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:20:15 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/#comment-1431993 GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!! GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!GEORGE HAS NO BUSH!!!!!!!!!

]]> By: george has no BUSH http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/comment-page-3/#comment-1431992 george has no BUSH Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:19:39 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/#comment-1431992 i hate the united states.(civil war) i hate the united states.(civil war)

]]> By: transcendental floss » civil war http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/comment-page-3/#comment-1199194 transcendental floss » civil war Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:53:23 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/#comment-1199194 [...] the admission part is mere formality. the policy has failed and the ship has sailed. the whole world, including the great majority of americans, want the u.s. out of iraq, which means george bush is leader of the lunatic fringe insisting we should stick around awhile longer. President Bush intensified diplomatic efforts on Monday to quell rising violence in Iraq and Afghanistan, turning to allies as his national security adviser said the conflict in Iraq had entered “a new phase” requiring changes. [...] [...] the admission part is mere formality. the policy has failed and the ship has sailed. the whole world, including the great majority of americans, want the u.s. out of iraq, which means george bush is leader of the lunatic fringe insisting we should stick around awhile longer. President Bush intensified diplomatic efforts on Monday to quell rising violence in Iraq and Afghanistan, turning to allies as his national security adviser said the conflict in Iraq had entered “a new phase” requiring changes. [...]

]]> By: Jon Swift http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/comment-page-3/#comment-1198060 Jon Swift Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:34:20 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/#comment-1198060 <strong>What's So Civil About the Iraq War?...</strong> I don't think the Iraq War is very civil at all.... What’s So Civil About the Iraq War?…

I don’t think the Iraq War is very civil at all….

]]> By: God is a Nihilist http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/comment-page-3/#comment-1196533 God is a Nihilist Wed, 29 Nov 2006 03:57:00 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/#comment-1196533 Do people really think that if we stop fighting them over there, we will start fighting them here??..................................So.........If I stop having sex with my girlfriend's friend, will my girlfriend stop having sex with me? Do people really think that if we stop fighting them over there, we will start fighting them here??…………………………….So………If I stop having sex with my girlfriend’s friend, will my girlfriend stop having sex with me?

]]> By: JPark http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/comment-page-3/#comment-1195880 JPark Wed, 29 Nov 2006 01:45:05 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/#comment-1195880 Goodscarrier. Why do you insist on being an ass? Is it an attention thing? Mommy didn't give you hugs? Goodscarrier. Why do you insist on being an ass? Is it an attention thing? Mommy didn’t give you hugs?

]]> By: The Daily Background http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/comment-page-3/#comment-1194138 The Daily Background Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:05:19 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/#comment-1194138 [...] Wash Post’s Dana Priest: “Absolutely” believes the “level of violence [in Iraq] equals a civil war.” [...] [...] Wash Post’s Dana Priest: “Absolutely” believes the “level of violence [in Iraq] equals a civil war.” [...]

]]> By: Drew http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/comment-page-3/#comment-1193579 Drew Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:35:28 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/#comment-1193579 In a chat today, Peter Baker of the Washington Post answered a question about why he didn't use the term "civil war" and, like Dana Priest, seemed to be delicately pointing a finger at his boss, the WaPo editor. I think both these journalists are being careful not to publicly criticize their boss, while making it clear they don't necessarily agree with his decision. Peter Baker: Len Downie, our executive editor, was asked about this yesterday by Editor & Publisher. Here's what he told them: "We just describe what goes on everyday. We don't have a policy about it. We are not making judgments one way or another. The language in the stories is very precise when dealing with it. At various times people say it is 'close to a civil war,' but we don't have a policy about it." In a chat today, Peter Baker of the Washington Post answered a question about why he didn’t use the term “civil war” and, like Dana Priest, seemed to be delicately pointing a finger at his boss, the WaPo editor. I think both these journalists are being careful not to publicly criticize their boss, while making it clear they don’t necessarily agree with his decision.

Peter Baker: Len Downie, our executive editor, was asked about this yesterday by Editor & Publisher. Here’s what he told them: “We just describe what goes on everyday. We don’t have a policy about it. We are not making judgments one way or another. The language in the stories is very precise when dealing with it. At various times people say it is ‘close to a civil war,’ but we don’t have a policy about it.”

]]> By: TM http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/comment-page-3/#comment-1193536 TM Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:23:04 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/27/washington-post-civil-war/#comment-1193536 ...because that's not the reason that we are over there? ...because the president said they were going to be mushroom clouds over our cities when in fact, all Sadaam had was a slingshot? ...because this campaign has been one incompetent move after another? Are those some reasons? …because that’s not the reason that we are over there?
…because the president said they were going to be mushroom clouds over our cities when in fact, all Sadaam had was a slingshot?
…because this campaign has been one incompetent move after another?

Are those some reasons?

]]>