Does the fact that you personally made a lot of money, and by some reasoning attribute this gain to Bush, mean that he can do whatever he wants and it is okay with you? Should we leave him alone even when he is responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands? Should we leave him alone when his illegal and completely unnecessary and horribly destructive war creates mountains of debt that will be paid by us, and our children, and our grandchildren for decades to come? Just because you made some money here in the present?
Do you live by any moral or ethical framework at all? OR DO YOU ONLY CARE ABOUT YOURSELF AND YOUR MONEY?
I think Angelina’s being sarcastic. Right, Angie?… Angie?
Oh, and I have confidence in the administration apparatus this president has built. I think he can hit the teens in approval ratings. Single digits is not out of the realm of possibility.
Well, thanks in large part to Dubya a few more Dems got jobs – in the House of Representatives and the Senate.
Nice that he made you money. Although I suspect
(a) you’re not actually a woman
(b) you’re actually lying about the money you’ve supposedly made
Regardless, you are a pitiful creature whose allegiances can be bought and sold. Thankfully ilk like you are in minority and will have to watch Bush waddle through the last couple years of his presidency. With any luck you’ll not have to watch him impeached.
You worship the dumbest occupant of the White House in U.S. history, presidential pets included, and you’re calling us “dumb”? By the way, the word is “serfdom”.
Angelina = Proof that getting rich has nothing to do with being smart, honest, or decent.
Angie is a name changing troll, when a name gets banned, it changes. It has been red state loyalist, ben, vinnie and other names.
I suspect it is a little child that is not watched by it’s mommy while it is on the internet.
But it makes a great example of the 30 percenters to laugh at.
I know some of these 30%. It’s not that they still like the moron, it’s they don’t want to admit they’ were/are wrong.
Comment by Jeffrey Stewart — December 8, 2006 @ 5:50 pm
You hit the nail on the head. The 30 percenters that I know have all been blowhard Republicans for many years, and have been relentlessly cocksure about their political beliefs and their faith in the GOP. Needless to say, their loudmouthed support of Bush has made it tough for them to admit they are wrong, but there is more to it than that. Many of these people are actually quite afraid of confronting the fact that they might be wrong about any of their value judgments and religious beliefs. I have noticed that this personality type typically grows angry and hostile when confronted with any information that contradicts their poorly thought out belief system, particularly when the contradiction itself is internal to their belief system. This aversion to introspection paves the way for them to live comfortably with their hypocrisy. They are perfect candidates for manipulation by an authoritative regime.
Somebody needs to tell angie that the gazillion Iraqi dinars she bought are virtually worthless. I sure hope she’s not spending all the “money” that she thinks she has. If so, she’s in for a rude awakening.
It appears I was wrong about Angelina. He/she/it’s probably most likely a blog-troll performing artist, playing an absurd character in order to cause outrage. Not a very convincing one, but it probably fills her empty days…
With apologies to the Rolling Stones…
Angie
Angie
Where will you lead us from here?
Angie
Angie
Why are you so full of fear?
With that money in your bowl and that darkness in your soul
You can’t say that we’re surprised
But Angie
We still hate you
Everywhere we look we see your eyes
Your pointy white hood doesn’t hide your shame
Come on Angie, get a life…
Angie
Angie
Why don’t you up and disappear…
Angelina – take some of that $7mil and hire an english teacher. It’s ‘family’s’ you fool. If this wasn’t the bush era I’d say you were too stupid to make that kind of money.
We will be back in 10-15 years to get the rest of what rightfully
belongs to us.
Wow. Last night you were a Bible-thumping homophobe who likes to frequent gay websites. Today you’re a hateful, spiteful, greedy person who imagines the Civil War didn’t end 140 years ago with your side on the losing end. You just made William Tecumseh Sherman a personal hero of mine.
I guess in all your bible-thumping you missed the part about the camel and the eye of the needle?
Oy vey. Another Confederate loser. Loser! You lost the war and you are back on your way out again. We’ll cede you’re cracker ass to Mexico and turn your old plantations into gay bars and abortion clinics and NAACP chapters.
Hey “angelina”, you may have $7 gazillion in Monopoly money, but I have something that you won’t ever have: friends. So try getting out of your parent’s basement once in a while.
IMHO, I believe the greatest disaster to occur under the watch of this administration is yet to happen. The United States is surviving a period without a functional government. I can’t say whether it will be a natural disaster or something else. But I am certain you cannot fill the ranks of a government with incompetents or those who only focus on their own self interests. You cannot ignore your real enemies and waste all of your energy warring against ghosts; you cannot ignore border security, chemical and nuclear plant security, emergency management infrastructure, and true passenger airline security and not eventually pay a heavy price.
This administration is utterly out to lunch. Until they are all impeached and removed from office we are at greater peril than need be.
It was posted here yesterday that Washington DC whores make big bucks. This must be how you made your millions, prostituting and blackmailing because you certainly didn’t make money on your intelligence. My suggestion, take spelling lessons.
Angie – If you are not Native American than your pride belongs elsewhere. Only Native Americans can truthfully claim that the land was stolen from them.
They are perfect candidates for manipulation by an authoritative regime.
Comment by VerbalKint — December 8, 2006 @ 6:07 pm
I agree with this assessment.
I also know people who are apparently unable to accept they’ve made a mistake -as such an admission would threaten their entire belief ystem, which they are wholly unwilling to reconsider.
That’s a good description for the die-hard believers: They reject reality and substitute their own.
I totally agree with you … this administration seems to be concerned solely with its own image and how it can benefit its friends. They have absolutely no concern of any threat to this country except how to take advantage of that threat politically. Again and again they are dismissing warnings and digging this country deeper and deeper. Anyone who doesn’t see this is either blind or asleep.
However, I don’t see this administration being impeached. We just have to hope that the Democratic Congress can actually be productive in protecting this country.
I agree. Bush’s ego is fragile and he is self-absorbed. People that still support him have the same fragile egos and are also self-absorbed. It the apple and tree theory.
Republicans are all about the money.
Democrats are all about freedom.
According to Republican Teddy Roosevelt, Republican Dwight Eisenhower and Democrat Harry Truman, any form of war profiteering is treason. Easy to forget their views in this day of private contractors.
e colli – not sure I understand your posting. Do these statements mean that the bilateral agreement takes precidence over US laws? Is fratboy cheerleader once again dismissing US law?
I don’t think Republicans are necessarily all about money … and dems all about freedom. The Neocons seem to be all about money and empire. And remember that Democratic congressman Jefferson had 90k found in his freezer…
The problem right now is the fact that the Republicans, even the good ones, refuse to question the corruption … I think there it is more of an issue of wanting to hold onto their seats than just money…
If anything the difference between Dems and Republicans is how they want to make use of the governments money. For the most part Democrats want to use money to help individuals, and Republicans want to cut spending that benefits individuals and give it to the corporations.
For the most part Democrats want to use money to help individuals, and Republicans want to cut spending that benefits individuals and give it to the corporations.
—- AshenShard
e coli – do you think that Bush still holds a great deal of power? Lately, world leaders seem to be laughing out loud at Bush… kind of giving him the finger. That is why I question his power. Bush seems to exist in some unreal world, it’s kind of scary and sad at the same time. I get this mental image of Bush walking around the WH talking to himself and telling himself that he is always right with his decisions. He seems out of touch. The press conference with Tony Blair was interesting. When Bush was asked a question that made him angry, he did his usual “heeheehee” but the reporter asking the question didn’t seem to buy the Bush act. Just thinking out loud.
He hasn’t even started vetoing Democratic legislation favored by solid majorities. When that happens, he’ll hit 25% and set some more records firmly establishing him as the worst ever.
I was thinking the same thing … but I don’t know … this is assuming that these bills go through with no riders on them. If they go through pure, then yes that may happen … but, one also cannot dismiss the stubborn thirty-percenters …
Anyone remember what Nixon’s low is? Because if he reaches that, I want the media to start talking about that 24/7 … then maybe we’ll see him stepping down.
AshenShard, I think Nixon hit 27% during the pre-impeachment hearings. But, careful now. It may be a crime to celebrate bad poll numbers of a former or sitting president. You never know.
Wait until he remains in denial and rejects most if not all of the recent Iraq group study results. Can these polls do negative numbers? They may be needed.
Outgoing lawmaker cites numerous abuses of the Constitution by President Bush
Editor’s note: GNN has been covering this story as it unfolds on Capitol Hill. We will have video of Rep. McKinney’s floor speech and an exclusive interview with the Congresswoman up shortly.
On Monday, gathering in a conference room in Washington D.C., Georgia Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney and her advisors worked on a draft copy of the articles of impeachment against President Bush.
At the heart of the charges contained in McKinney’s articles of impeachment, is the allegation that President Bush has not upheld the oath of presidential office and is guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors.
Article I states that President Bush has failed to preserve, protect and defend the constitution. Specifically cited in this article is the charge that Bush has manipulated intelligence and lied to justify war: “George Walker Bush … in preparing the invasion of Iraq, did withhold intelligence from the Congress, by refusing to provide Congress with the full intelligence picture that he was being given, by redacting information … and actively manipulating the intelligence on Iraq’s alleged weapons programs by pressuring the Central Intelligence Agency and other intelligence agencies.â€
This manipulation of intelligence was done, the charge continues, “with the intent to misinform the people and their representatives in Congress in order to gain their support for invading Iraq, denying both the people and their representatives in Congress the right to make an informed choice.â€
Article II, “Abuse of office and of executive privilege,†states that President Bush has disregarded his oath of office by “obstructing and hindering the work of Congressional investigative bodies and by seeking to expand the scope of the powers of his office.†The President has “failed to take responsibility for, investigate or discipline those responsible for an ongoing pattern of negligence, incompetence and malfeasance to the detriment of the American people.â€
This article continues by indicting Vice President Dick Cheney and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, in their actions to manipulate or “fix†intelligence and mislead the public about Iraq’s weapons programs. Ultimately, this article calls not only for Bush’s impeachment and removal from office but also asks the same actions to be taken against Cheney and Rice.
Article III states that President Bush has failed to “ensure the laws are faithfully executed†and that he has “violated the letter and spirit of laws and rules of criminal procedure used by civilian and military courts, and has violated or ignored regulatory codes and practices that carry out the law.â€
Specifically, McKinney cites illegal domestic spying as a result of failing to obtain warrants thereby subverting congress and the judiciary in the process: “… by circumventing the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act courts established by Congress, whose express purpose is to check such abuses of executive power, provoking the presiding judge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to file a complaint and another judge to resign in protest, the said program having been subsequently ruled illegal; he has also concealed the existence of this unlawful program of spying on American citizens from the people and all but a few of their representatives in Congress, even resorting to outright public deceit.â€
The article continues by citing public statements Bush has made that were blatantly contradictory to his policy and actions regarding domestic spying.
While the staff was editing the document, one advisor told me, “As we sat down and worked on this, a pattern became very clear … a pattern to specifically undermine the constitution and establish a unitary presidency.â€
The charges addressed in McKinney’s resolution are nothing revelatory or new. Rather, they are issues which have been in the public eye for quite some time and have increasingly been covered in the media over the last year.
Despite winning the congressional majority, the Democrats have yet to put forth a plan to investigate what have become somewhat ubiquitous allegations.
Speaker-elect, Representative Pelosi, dismissed any possibility of impeachment, saying it is “off the table†and that it is “a waste of time … making them lameducks is good enough for me.†Although, in the November election, 60% of the voters in her own district cast ballots in favor of Proposition J, a measure calling for the impeachment of President Bush.
In 2005 Representative John Conyers sponsored a resolution, HR 365, to create a special committee to investigate allegations against the Bush Administration – a move that would likely lead to the discovery of impeachable offenses. This resolution was passed to the House Committee on Rules and was never brought up for a vote.
At that time it was widely believed that if the Democrats took control of congress, Conyers would reintroduce the resolution as would have subpoena power if selected as leader of the House Judiciary Committee.
A few days after the Democrats won control Conyers echoed Pelosi’s statement saying, “I am in total agreement with her on this issue … impeachment is off the table.†Last week a spokesperson from Conyers office said that the resolution would not be reintroduced and that the Representative had no intention to pursue the matter.
Will other members of congress support the action Congresswoman McKinney has brought forth?
At the table in what could be considered her impeachment “war room†the question is brought up a number of times.
Mike, an advisor to McKinney, mentions, “Conyers was supposed to have investigations. They were chomping at the bit 6 months ago to do subpoenas.â€
McKinney quietly replies, “Now they say they aren’t even going to issue subpoenas.â€
Looking up from her papers she takes a deep breath, “I’m going in alone on this one because now it is all about them playing majority politics.â€
This is McKinney’s last week as a member of congress and this act, to impeach the president, is the final resolution she will enter into the Congressional record.
For those who know anything about Cynthia McKinney it may come as no surprise that she would file this resolution as her parting gift to Congress.
McKinney is no stranger to being attacked by the media and has been isolated from her own party.
From her inquiries into election fraud in 2000 to her calls for a transparent and thorough investigation into 9-11, not to mention the widely covered run-in she had with the Capitol Hill Police, the congresswoman is aware that this resolution will likely be ignored and that she will be ruthlessly attacked upon its filing.
“What do you think they are going to do to me this time?†she asks her staff. Everyone uncomfortably shifts in their seats and after no answer comes McKinney explains, “We have to do this because this is simply the right thing to do. The American people do want to hold this man and his office accountable for the crimes they have committed and if no member of congress is willing to do it, than I will.â€
It is questionable as to how effective this move could be in gaining support because of her reputation as a firebrand congresswoman and because, ultimately, she is on her way out of office.
The Congresswoman and her staff realize this but hope that by filing the articles of impeachment it will, at the very least, open up a discussion on whether or not President Bush and key members of his administration have committed impeachable offenses and whether our officials should be held to account.
“My duty as a member of Congress is merely to uphold and preserve the constitution and to represent the will of my constituency. Ultimately, it isn’t up to me or any other member of congress – it is up to the American people to decide.â€
GNN contributor Matt Pascarella is a freelance journalist & producer who was present during the drafting of the Articles of Impeachment that Congresswoman McKinney filed today.
I realize that 30% is an abominably low approval rating, but it still amazes me that Bush’s approval rating is that high. Every presidential historian I’ve spoken to has said that Bush is the worst president in American history, due to the convergence of incompetence, corruption, usurpation of power, and flagrant disregard for the Consitution that has marked his administration.
Zogby: Bush at an alltime low 30%. Want to get that number even lower? When he says that he talks to families that die, when wings take dream, that working parents put food on their families, that OB/GYNs ought to practice their love for women, laugh at him. Use those index fingers to point at him while you do so.
And then, for that final, delicious Scanners moment, tell him that the twins had a threesome with Hugo Chavez in Argentina.
Sorry folk’s,(Not) I heard on my local channell new’s tonight that bull shit bush’s number was at 27%….His elevater is heading for the basement…..LOL……Blessings
I think all those angie and aka posts come out of a mental institution where they play monopoly all day and frequently are able to access the warden’s internet connection.
As far as I am concerned, McKinney’s final revengeful act is misguided, and a mistake. She almost has zero credibility. She just can’t let go, and exit the stage gracefully.
I live in Atlanta, and I’m very familiar with her irrational behavior and explosive temper. I think she needs to take an anger management class. I’m glad she’s gone. I’m a liberal and she’s a liberal, but I’m glad she’s gone. She was a negative to the Democratic Party.
Cynthia McKinney was on the right side of the war issue the whole way down the road. She is funny, irreverent, lively, and proud. That bastard who accosted her at the House should have been fired if not arrested.
Long Live Cynthia McKinney. To call her (certainly deserved) action of filing a bill of impeachment symbolically, IN NO WAY can that be called ‘vengeful.’
Another proud act, albeit symbolic, but quite like the NAY vote of Barbara Lee on the Afghanistan authorization, which has ALSO been a disaster.
Bush has done the crimes — he should be impeached from any standard of justice. Politics, however, is also important, and resignation will serve as well as impeachment.
The Democrats have a moral obligation to impeach this president. The Republican Congress impeached President Clinton when his approval ratings were hovering around 60 percent for a trumped up perjury trap. Even OJ Simpson a murderer was allowed to commit perjury during his civil trial without any legal repurcussions.
Alan Simpson on C-Span: “We could have gotten a 100 to 0 vote if we had censured President Clinton but no, others had to go for blood”.
At the very least, this Congress needs to censure Bush if he doesn’t lay out a plan to get our troops out of Iraq by the time they come back into session next year.
After the censure, they should only approve funds for the war that will be used to bring our troops home. If after that, Dictator Bush doesn’t get them out of that immoral hellhole, then they should start impeachment hearings.
It should also be made clear that Cheney either resign his position or he will be impeached also after he takes the oath of office. Who should be sitting in the wings to take over as Commander In Chief? It should be Chuck Hagel, a real soldier who would do whatever it takes to get us out of Iraq.
I live in Atlanta, and I’m very familiar with her irrational behavior and explosive temper. I think she needs to take an anger management class. I’m glad she’s gone. I’m a liberal and she’s a liberal, but I’m glad she’s gone. She was a negative to the Democratic Party.
John
I bet you wouldn’t say that to her face. You’ll probably get your ass kicked in.
That 30% approval rating is just all part of the 13 state GOP plan to represent the old Confederacy — the smaller their base shrinks, the more unrepresentative the party will become. Pretty soon it will just be made up of Angies of the world and Dick Cheney.
Hay Marie, seem’s pretty unreasonable that someone with that suposed kind of money would be spending their time here and using a screen name like that….I think it is a southern inbred, skin head teen ager playing with mom’s computer…Or one in a juvie somewhere with library privlages….No adult, rich, well bred person would waste their time with such drivel as this troll doe’s…Blessings
Does it seem to anyone else that the pasted-in rantings of our resident trolls are becoming more and more incoherent? I guess this is probably little more than a pathetic attempt to gum up the threads. Pretty annoying.
If you people can OPENLY,and I mean “OPENLY” blaspheme the word of GOD on this site,and then laugh about it,and no one,NOT ONE! stands up for the Lord Our Savior,not to mention running off people with non (neo) conservative views looking for a better way,then I can SURELY post here anything that I so desire. Wouldn`t you agree?
No?
Too bad. Go ahead and TRY to stop me.I dare you. I really do.
I`ll have your pompous,heathenistic site shut down so fast,it will make your wildest 60`s
hallucination seem like a trip to the candy store.
Go ahead and push my “legal” hand, I dare you.
And I`m a Democrat! A southern Democrat!
You people need to go Independent Party.You are giving Democrats a bad name.
Say Marie, are you still areound.?..Remember my last post.?…It appear’s the troll made my case..The child is now making threat’s and demand’s…Teen age skin head’s are not worth our time, I will no longer respond to it’s insane fit’s…..Blessings
All about Digimon Adventure Online Game. Digimon Adventure Fans Blog….
…Digimon is a small virtual pet. You can download and play an online RPG in the Digimon universe. It looks and feels like 2D graphic RPG adventure. You can train and level up your Digimon, make hundreds of quests, and travel through a huge universe a…
shag hairstyle basically gotits name from the word “shaggy” since …once the hair is cutand layered it gives off a shaggy look. The shag hairstyle has always been apopular hairstyle, and there are plenty ofshag hairstyles to choose from…
Sweet, go 20’s
December 8th, 2006 at 5:34 pmFinally, Bush’s approval rating and IQ converge.
December 8th, 2006 at 5:36 pm#2
Wow! Is his IQ really that high?!
December 8th, 2006 at 5:37 pmThere is still that pesky 30% who believe in the worst president in history. What are they looking at? or through?
December 8th, 2006 at 5:39 pmLeave the man that made me $7,000,000 and counting alone.
Please. Your surfdom only shines through.
Take a shower and get a job you dumbycrats.
December 8th, 2006 at 5:40 pmThanks angie, go blow it out your ass.
December 8th, 2006 at 5:43 pmLeave the man that made me $7,000,000 and counting alone.
Comment by angelina from Ga. — December 8, 2006 @ 5:40 pm
Are you a war profiteer?
December 8th, 2006 at 5:45 pmAngelina,
Does the fact that you personally made a lot of money, and by some reasoning attribute this gain to Bush, mean that he can do whatever he wants and it is okay with you? Should we leave him alone even when he is responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands? Should we leave him alone when his illegal and completely unnecessary and horribly destructive war creates mountains of debt that will be paid by us, and our children, and our grandchildren for decades to come? Just because you made some money here in the present?
Do you live by any moral or ethical framework at all? OR DO YOU ONLY CARE ABOUT YOURSELF AND YOUR MONEY?
December 8th, 2006 at 5:49 pmI know some of these 30%. It’s not that they still like the moron, it’s they don’t want to admit they’ were/are wrong.
December 8th, 2006 at 5:50 pmI doubt that angie’s a war profiteer. If so, her haul would have been much larger.
She probably just smuggles Mexicans across the border.
Whatever the case, she sure sold out her principles cheap if she’s still supporting GDumbya the little tin cowboy.
December 8th, 2006 at 5:50 pmeave the man that made me $7,000,000 and counting alone.
Comment by angelina from Ga. — December 8, 2006 @ 5:40 pm
Are you a war profiteer?
Comment by VerbalKint — December 8, 2006 @ 5:45 pm
You bet I am. Just returning some of what was STOLEN in the civil
war to their rightful owners.Oh yea,feelings still run deep.
We will be back in 10-15 years to get the rest of what rightfully
belongs to us.
Count on it.
December 8th, 2006 at 5:52 pmI think Angelina’s being sarcastic. Right, Angie?… Angie?
Oh, and I have confidence in the administration apparatus this president has built. I think he can hit the teens in approval ratings. Single digits is not out of the realm of possibility.
December 8th, 2006 at 5:55 pmAngelina likes to cut herself regularly, to avoid those feelings of depression and hopelessness.
December 8th, 2006 at 5:55 pmWell, thanks in large part to Dubya a few more Dems got jobs – in the House of Representatives and the Senate.
Nice that he made you money. Although I suspect
(a) you’re not actually a woman
(b) you’re actually lying about the money you’ve supposedly made
Regardless, you are a pitiful creature whose allegiances can be bought and sold. Thankfully ilk like you are in minority and will have to watch Bush waddle through the last couple years of his presidency. With any luck you’ll not have to watch him impeached.
December 8th, 2006 at 5:56 pm#5 angelina
Please. Your surfdom only shines through.
Take a shower and get a job you dumbycrats.
You worship the dumbest occupant of the White House in U.S. history, presidential pets included, and you’re calling us “dumb”? By the way, the word is “serfdom”.
Angelina = Proof that getting rich has nothing to do with being smart, honest, or decent.
December 8th, 2006 at 5:58 pmI could give a rats ass what happens to you yanks and this country any longer.
This has to do with the civil war.And what my family lost back then.
We have a secret ‘code” if you know what I mean.
And yes,Bush can do whatever he wants to do.All my investments are in the right places and I stand to make another $70,000,000+
after the war.
And no my principles didn`t get sold cheap smartass.
I said $7,000,000 and counting NOW.My investment firm will notify
me when to sell off the rest of my holdings which are estimated to be at right about $30,000,000 when the war is over.
In other words he will tell me from a friend from a friend from a “friend” when the best time to dump will be.
Back to your mac and cheese ingrates.
A war profiteer? Hardly. I wouldn`t stoop as low as you yanks did
during the civil war. Let`s just say I have “very staute” business
sense.
December 8th, 2006 at 5:59 pmJust to be clear, Angelina, which civil war are you talking ignorantly about?
December 8th, 2006 at 6:02 pmsurfdom smurfdom
shizzlefitz.
what diff does it make.
I never said I worshipped Bush.
he is simply the vehicle to which I am reclaiming my families losses during the civil war.
period.
I think he is the dumbest ass to ever walk the face of the earth.
That is not the point. My families honor and dignity is.
Good day.
I know better than anyone how the Iraqis feel,believe me.
Letting “unknowns” divy up their land and posessions.
And having a govt. forced down their throats.
I won`t even go there.
This is ancestral pride thing for me.
Go about your business.
December 8th, 2006 at 6:05 pmAngie is a name changing troll, when a name gets banned, it changes. It has been red state loyalist, ben, vinnie and other names.
I suspect it is a little child that is not watched by it’s mommy while it is on the internet.
December 8th, 2006 at 6:05 pmBut it makes a great example of the 30 percenters to laugh at.
I know some of these 30%. It’s not that they still like the moron, it’s they don’t want to admit they’ were/are wrong.
Comment by Jeffrey Stewart — December 8, 2006 @ 5:50 pm
You hit the nail on the head. The 30 percenters that I know have all been blowhard Republicans for many years, and have been relentlessly cocksure about their political beliefs and their faith in the GOP. Needless to say, their loudmouthed support of Bush has made it tough for them to admit they are wrong, but there is more to it than that. Many of these people are actually quite afraid of confronting the fact that they might be wrong about any of their value judgments and religious beliefs. I have noticed that this personality type typically grows angry and hostile when confronted with any information that contradicts their poorly thought out belief system, particularly when the contradiction itself is internal to their belief system. This aversion to introspection paves the way for them to live comfortably with their hypocrisy. They are perfect candidates for manipulation by an authoritative regime.
December 8th, 2006 at 6:07 pmLike the kid in “Deliverance?” Speaking in banjos?
December 8th, 2006 at 6:07 pmGWB’s hard core base is begininng to see the light and scurry under the refrigerator.
December 8th, 2006 at 6:10 pmSomebody needs to tell angie that the gazillion Iraqi dinars she bought are virtually worthless. I sure hope she’s not spending all the “money” that she thinks she has. If so, she’s in for a rude awakening.
December 8th, 2006 at 6:10 pm(a) you’re not actually a woman
(b) you’re actually lying about the money you’ve supposedly made
Comment by roger_inkart — December 8, 2006 @ 5:56 pm
Bingo. My profile of “angelina”:
1. Male
December 8th, 2006 at 6:10 pm2. 15-19 years old
3. Below average social skills
That is the same percent of people that wire money from their back accounts in order to take advantage of the Nigerian e-mail scams.
You know, the Mo-rans!
-GSD
December 8th, 2006 at 6:12 pmIt appears I was wrong about Angelina. He/she/it’s probably most likely a blog-troll performing artist, playing an absurd character in order to cause outrage. Not a very convincing one, but it probably fills her empty days…
December 8th, 2006 at 6:13 pmWith apologies to the Rolling Stones…
December 8th, 2006 at 6:13 pmAngie
Angie
Where will you lead us from here?
Angie
Angie
Why are you so full of fear?
With that money in your bowl and that darkness in your soul
You can’t say that we’re surprised
But Angie
We still hate you
Everywhere we look we see your eyes
Your pointy white hood doesn’t hide your shame
Come on Angie, get a life…
Angie
Angie
Why don’t you up and disappear…
Angelina – take some of that $7mil and hire an english teacher. It’s ‘family’s’ you fool. If this wasn’t the bush era I’d say you were too stupid to make that kind of money.
December 8th, 2006 at 6:13 pmTP, Judd and crew. this angie is the same troll posting bigotted KKK posts and attacking Zooey on in the last couple of threads from last night.
Can you do anything about it?
December 8th, 2006 at 6:14 pm#11 Angelina
We will be back in 10-15 years to get the rest of what rightfully
belongs to us.
Wow. Last night you were a Bible-thumping homophobe who likes to frequent gay websites. Today you’re a hateful, spiteful, greedy person who imagines the Civil War didn’t end 140 years ago with your side on the losing end. You just made William Tecumseh Sherman a personal hero of mine.
I guess in all your bible-thumping you missed the part about the camel and the eye of the needle?
December 8th, 2006 at 6:14 pmOy vey. Another Confederate loser. Loser! You lost the war and you are back on your way out again. We’ll cede you’re cracker ass to Mexico and turn your old plantations into gay bars and abortion clinics and NAACP chapters.
Take you white sheets and go screw.
-GSD
December 8th, 2006 at 6:15 pmWayne,
Somehow you don`t make my nipples very hard.
Away with you.
My fortunes await.
$30,000,000 immediately after the war
$40,000,000 after stock sell off
$7,000,000 what I have made since my investments.
In todays dollars that will ALMOST cover my families losses in the
civil war.ALMOST.
But I am by far not htrough yet.
some advice: “when you steal money and think you got away with
it,(yanks-civil war) it makes the victims VERY VERY money wise on
how to “work the system”
back to work peanuts characters.
December 8th, 2006 at 6:15 pmAngelina, I’m sorry to have to break it to you, but you can charge more than $10.00 per under Bush.
December 8th, 2006 at 6:17 pmHey “angelina”, you may have $7 gazillion in Monopoly money, but I have something that you won’t ever have: friends. So try getting out of your parent’s basement once in a while.
December 8th, 2006 at 6:18 pmCan you say $70,000,000 in retrieved fundage GSD?
Now come along,boil some water.
I need to soak my feet.
And send me that nice,manly muscular son of your back up here
after dark will you?
December 8th, 2006 at 6:18 pmCan you do anything about it?
Comment by Wayne
Thanks, Wayne.
December 8th, 2006 at 6:20 pm#32 Crackers from Crackerville
Wayne,
Somehow you don`t make my nipples very hard.
Oh that’s just mean. Wayne, you’re not going to take that from her, are you?
December 8th, 2006 at 6:21 pmAnd send me that nice,manly muscular son of your back up here
after dark will you?
Comment by angelina from Ga. — December 8, 2006 @ 6:18 pm
Okay, I want to append my post #24 thusly:
4. Closeted, self-hating homosexual
December 8th, 2006 at 6:21 pmStop playing with the troll. I hate seeing trolls getting happy from all of the unwarranted attention they crave.
December 8th, 2006 at 6:22 pmStop playing with the troll. I hate seeing trolls getting happy from all of the unwarranted attention they crave.
Comment by TheToonGuy — December 8, 2006 @ 6:22 pm
Dang, ToonGuy, I was just funnin’ with it! But you’re right. I’ll put it down and leave it alone.
December 8th, 2006 at 6:26 pmOh that’s just mean. Wayne, you’re not going to take that from her, are you?
— chimpeach
Him, this troll was calling itself vinnie the other day.
I’m not into guys anyway, hehe.
December 8th, 2006 at 6:31 pmThe frat boy cheerleader is sinking fast. Just wish he would disappear.
December 8th, 2006 at 6:34 pm#3…don’t forget, he gets 25 points for being a “decider vet.”
December 8th, 2006 at 6:37 pmIMHO, I believe the greatest disaster to occur under the watch of this administration is yet to happen. The United States is surviving a period without a functional government. I can’t say whether it will be a natural disaster or something else. But I am certain you cannot fill the ranks of a government with incompetents or those who only focus on their own self interests. You cannot ignore your real enemies and waste all of your energy warring against ghosts; you cannot ignore border security, chemical and nuclear plant security, emergency management infrastructure, and true passenger airline security and not eventually pay a heavy price.
This administration is utterly out to lunch. Until they are all impeached and removed from office we are at greater peril than need be.
December 8th, 2006 at 6:38 pmthis troll was calling itself vinnie the other day.
Comment by Wayne — December 8, 2006 @ 6:31 pm
I’ve noticed how some trolls use opposite-gender monikers. They could choose gender-neutral ones, but that’s not what they do.
What’s with the feeble-minded and their gender identity issues?
December 8th, 2006 at 6:39 pmAngelina from GA
It was posted here yesterday that Washington DC whores make big bucks. This must be how you made your millions, prostituting and blackmailing because you certainly didn’t make money on your intelligence. My suggestion, take spelling lessons.
December 8th, 2006 at 6:44 pmWhat’s with the feeble-minded and their gender identity issues?
Comment by Gregor Samsa
It’s as clever as they get.
December 8th, 2006 at 6:46 pmThis is ancestral pride thing for me.
Angie – If you are not Native American than your pride belongs elsewhere. Only Native Americans can truthfully claim that the land was stolen from them.
Now go study History.
December 8th, 2006 at 6:47 pmThey are perfect candidates for manipulation by an authoritative regime.
Comment by VerbalKint — December 8, 2006 @ 6:07 pm
I agree with this assessment.
I also know people who are apparently unable to accept they’ve made a mistake -as such an admission would threaten their entire belief ystem, which they are wholly unwilling to reconsider.
That’s a good description for the die-hard believers: They reject reality and substitute their own.
December 8th, 2006 at 6:48 pm#45 ScrewBush
I totally agree with you … this administration seems to be concerned solely with its own image and how it can benefit its friends. They have absolutely no concern of any threat to this country except how to take advantage of that threat politically. Again and again they are dismissing warnings and digging this country deeper and deeper. Anyone who doesn’t see this is either blind or asleep.
December 8th, 2006 at 6:49 pmHowever, I don’t see this administration being impeached. We just have to hope that the Democratic Congress can actually be productive in protecting this country.
Does anybody here doubt that angelina from Ga. and joe GOP are one and the same?
December 8th, 2006 at 6:50 pmGregor, Ashen,
I agree. Bush’s ego is fragile and he is self-absorbed. People that still support him have the same fragile egos and are also self-absorbed. It the apple and tree theory.
Republicans are all about the money.
December 8th, 2006 at 6:56 pmDemocrats are all about freedom.
According to Republican Teddy Roosevelt, Republican Dwight Eisenhower and Democrat Harry Truman, any form of war profiteering is treason. Easy to forget their views in this day of private contractors.
December 8th, 2006 at 6:58 pme colli – not sure I understand your posting. Do these statements mean that the bilateral agreement takes precidence over US laws? Is fratboy cheerleader once again dismissing US law?
December 8th, 2006 at 6:59 pmIs this angie person being satirical?
Or is she that batshit crazy???
December 8th, 2006 at 7:05 pm30% still believe in their fuhrer? They are indeed hardcore Nazis.
December 8th, 2006 at 7:08 pm
It appears that a Bush cultist is having a breakdown. Poor thing.
December 8th, 2006 at 7:08 pm#55 Coffins
I don’t think Republicans are necessarily all about money … and dems all about freedom. The Neocons seem to be all about money and empire. And remember that Democratic congressman Jefferson had 90k found in his freezer…
December 8th, 2006 at 7:12 pmThe problem right now is the fact that the Republicans, even the good ones, refuse to question the corruption … I think there it is more of an issue of wanting to hold onto their seats than just money…
If anything the difference between Dems and Republicans is how they want to make use of the governments money. For the most part Democrats want to use money to help individuals, and Republicans want to cut spending that benefits individuals and give it to the corporations.
For the most part Democrats want to use money to help individuals, and Republicans want to cut spending that benefits individuals and give it to the corporations.
—- AshenShard
Exactly…
December 8th, 2006 at 7:21 pmOr is she that batshit crazy???
Comment by New Prog — December 8, 2006 @ 7:05 pm
Angie is hopelessly beyond help. He is one very disturbed individual.
December 8th, 2006 at 7:22 pme coli – do you think that Bush still holds a great deal of power? Lately, world leaders seem to be laughing out loud at Bush… kind of giving him the finger. That is why I question his power. Bush seems to exist in some unreal world, it’s kind of scary and sad at the same time. I get this mental image of Bush walking around the WH talking to himself and telling himself that he is always right with his decisions. He seems out of touch. The press conference with Tony Blair was interesting. When Bush was asked a question that made him angry, he did his usual “heeheehee” but the reporter asking the question didn’t seem to buy the Bush act. Just thinking out loud.
December 8th, 2006 at 7:23 pm62 and 63 – Ashen and Wayne… good point. I just posted the general statement to get people thinking. Thanks.
December 8th, 2006 at 7:25 pmAll together now…everybody sing the Lame Duck Limbo!
HOW LOW CAN HE GO?
December 8th, 2006 at 7:29 pmHOW LOW CAN HE GO?
HOW LOW CAN HE GO?
HOW LOW CAN HE GO?
He hasn’t even started vetoing Democratic legislation favored by solid majorities. When that happens, he’ll hit 25% and set some more records firmly establishing him as the worst ever.
December 8th, 2006 at 7:33 pm“It’s a shame when someone loses their mind…”
— VP Dan Quayle
December 8th, 2006 at 7:37 pm#70 Bluedog49,
I was thinking the same thing … but I don’t know … this is assuming that these bills go through with no riders on them. If they go through pure, then yes that may happen … but, one also cannot dismiss the stubborn thirty-percenters …
Anyone remember what Nixon’s low is? Because if he reaches that, I want the media to start talking about that 24/7 … then maybe we’ll see him stepping down.
December 8th, 2006 at 7:39 pmNow really. That was the most pathetic case of a Bush cultist losing it I think I’ve ever seen here at this site. Just amazingly stupid and pathetic!
December 8th, 2006 at 7:43 pmAshenShard, I think Nixon hit 27% during the pre-impeachment hearings. But, careful now. It may be a crime to celebrate bad poll numbers of a former or sitting president. You never know.
December 8th, 2006 at 7:49 pmWait until he remains in denial and rejects most if not all of the recent Iraq group study results. Can these polls do negative numbers? They may be needed.
December 8th, 2006 at 7:49 pmangie from Georgia keeps taking dumps on all the threads.
December 8th, 2006 at 7:56 pmI seem to remember Nixon’s low hitting around 22%. It appears to be nearly impossible for a President to get below that.
December 8th, 2006 at 8:42 pmBREAKING! BREAKING! BREAKING!
BUSH IS IMPEACHED!
Outgoing lawmaker cites numerous abuses of the Constitution by President Bush
December 8th, 2006 at 9:06 pmEditor’s note: GNN has been covering this story as it unfolds on Capitol Hill. We will have video of Rep. McKinney’s floor speech and an exclusive interview with the Congresswoman up shortly.
On Monday, gathering in a conference room in Washington D.C., Georgia Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney and her advisors worked on a draft copy of the articles of impeachment against President Bush.
At the heart of the charges contained in McKinney’s articles of impeachment, is the allegation that President Bush has not upheld the oath of presidential office and is guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors.
Article I states that President Bush has failed to preserve, protect and defend the constitution. Specifically cited in this article is the charge that Bush has manipulated intelligence and lied to justify war: “George Walker Bush … in preparing the invasion of Iraq, did withhold intelligence from the Congress, by refusing to provide Congress with the full intelligence picture that he was being given, by redacting information … and actively manipulating the intelligence on Iraq’s alleged weapons programs by pressuring the Central Intelligence Agency and other intelligence agencies.â€
This manipulation of intelligence was done, the charge continues, “with the intent to misinform the people and their representatives in Congress in order to gain their support for invading Iraq, denying both the people and their representatives in Congress the right to make an informed choice.â€
Article II, “Abuse of office and of executive privilege,†states that President Bush has disregarded his oath of office by “obstructing and hindering the work of Congressional investigative bodies and by seeking to expand the scope of the powers of his office.†The President has “failed to take responsibility for, investigate or discipline those responsible for an ongoing pattern of negligence, incompetence and malfeasance to the detriment of the American people.â€
This article continues by indicting Vice President Dick Cheney and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, in their actions to manipulate or “fix†intelligence and mislead the public about Iraq’s weapons programs. Ultimately, this article calls not only for Bush’s impeachment and removal from office but also asks the same actions to be taken against Cheney and Rice.
Article III states that President Bush has failed to “ensure the laws are faithfully executed†and that he has “violated the letter and spirit of laws and rules of criminal procedure used by civilian and military courts, and has violated or ignored regulatory codes and practices that carry out the law.â€
Specifically, McKinney cites illegal domestic spying as a result of failing to obtain warrants thereby subverting congress and the judiciary in the process: “… by circumventing the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act courts established by Congress, whose express purpose is to check such abuses of executive power, provoking the presiding judge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to file a complaint and another judge to resign in protest, the said program having been subsequently ruled illegal; he has also concealed the existence of this unlawful program of spying on American citizens from the people and all but a few of their representatives in Congress, even resorting to outright public deceit.â€
The article continues by citing public statements Bush has made that were blatantly contradictory to his policy and actions regarding domestic spying.
While the staff was editing the document, one advisor told me, “As we sat down and worked on this, a pattern became very clear … a pattern to specifically undermine the constitution and establish a unitary presidency.â€
The charges addressed in McKinney’s resolution are nothing revelatory or new. Rather, they are issues which have been in the public eye for quite some time and have increasingly been covered in the media over the last year.
Despite winning the congressional majority, the Democrats have yet to put forth a plan to investigate what have become somewhat ubiquitous allegations.
Speaker-elect, Representative Pelosi, dismissed any possibility of impeachment, saying it is “off the table†and that it is “a waste of time … making them lameducks is good enough for me.†Although, in the November election, 60% of the voters in her own district cast ballots in favor of Proposition J, a measure calling for the impeachment of President Bush.
In 2005 Representative John Conyers sponsored a resolution, HR 365, to create a special committee to investigate allegations against the Bush Administration – a move that would likely lead to the discovery of impeachable offenses. This resolution was passed to the House Committee on Rules and was never brought up for a vote.
At that time it was widely believed that if the Democrats took control of congress, Conyers would reintroduce the resolution as would have subpoena power if selected as leader of the House Judiciary Committee.
A few days after the Democrats won control Conyers echoed Pelosi’s statement saying, “I am in total agreement with her on this issue … impeachment is off the table.†Last week a spokesperson from Conyers office said that the resolution would not be reintroduced and that the Representative had no intention to pursue the matter.
Will other members of congress support the action Congresswoman McKinney has brought forth?
At the table in what could be considered her impeachment “war room†the question is brought up a number of times.
Mike, an advisor to McKinney, mentions, “Conyers was supposed to have investigations. They were chomping at the bit 6 months ago to do subpoenas.â€
McKinney quietly replies, “Now they say they aren’t even going to issue subpoenas.â€
Looking up from her papers she takes a deep breath, “I’m going in alone on this one because now it is all about them playing majority politics.â€
This is McKinney’s last week as a member of congress and this act, to impeach the president, is the final resolution she will enter into the Congressional record.
For those who know anything about Cynthia McKinney it may come as no surprise that she would file this resolution as her parting gift to Congress.
McKinney is no stranger to being attacked by the media and has been isolated from her own party.
From her inquiries into election fraud in 2000 to her calls for a transparent and thorough investigation into 9-11, not to mention the widely covered run-in she had with the Capitol Hill Police, the congresswoman is aware that this resolution will likely be ignored and that she will be ruthlessly attacked upon its filing.
“What do you think they are going to do to me this time?†she asks her staff. Everyone uncomfortably shifts in their seats and after no answer comes McKinney explains, “We have to do this because this is simply the right thing to do. The American people do want to hold this man and his office accountable for the crimes they have committed and if no member of congress is willing to do it, than I will.â€
It is questionable as to how effective this move could be in gaining support because of her reputation as a firebrand congresswoman and because, ultimately, she is on her way out of office.
The Congresswoman and her staff realize this but hope that by filing the articles of impeachment it will, at the very least, open up a discussion on whether or not President Bush and key members of his administration have committed impeachable offenses and whether our officials should be held to account.
“My duty as a member of Congress is merely to uphold and preserve the constitution and to represent the will of my constituency. Ultimately, it isn’t up to me or any other member of congress – it is up to the American people to decide.â€
GNN contributor Matt Pascarella is a freelance journalist & producer who was present during the drafting of the Articles of Impeachment that Congresswoman McKinney filed today.
Angie has changed names to ACLU and is posting drivel again.
Sheesh
December 8th, 2006 at 9:12 pmYou don’t have to post this crap on every thread!
December 8th, 2006 at 9:13 pmYou don’t have to post this crap on every thread!
Comment by Zooey — December 8, 2006 @ 9:13 pm
Apparently when you are a pathetic, desperate 30 percenter who reads frontpagemagazine, you do need to post this crap on every thread.
December 8th, 2006 at 9:41 pm#62 – AshenShard,
December 8th, 2006 at 10:03 pmAnd that 90K was in cold cash!
Be nice to Angie, she’s just bitter because The Waffle House doesn’t give thier employees dental benifits.
December 8th, 2006 at 10:16 pmI realize that 30% is an abominably low approval rating, but it still amazes me that Bush’s approval rating is that high. Every presidential historian I’ve spoken to has said that Bush is the worst president in American history, due to the convergence of incompetence, corruption, usurpation of power, and flagrant disregard for the Consitution that has marked his administration.
December 9th, 2006 at 12:11 amZogby: Bush at an alltime low 30%. Want to get that number even lower? When he says that he talks to families that die, when wings take dream, that working parents put food on their families, that OB/GYNs ought to practice their love for women, laugh at him. Use those index fingers to point at him while you do so.
And then, for that final, delicious Scanners moment, tell him that the twins had a threesome with Hugo Chavez in Argentina.
December 9th, 2006 at 12:54 amSorry folk’s,(Not) I heard on my local channell new’s tonight that bull shit bush’s number was at 27%….His elevater is heading for the basement…..LOL……Blessings
December 9th, 2006 at 1:01 amI think all those angie and aka posts come out of a mental institution where they play monopoly all day and frequently are able to access the warden’s internet connection.
December 9th, 2006 at 1:15 amAs far as I am concerned, McKinney’s final revengeful act is misguided, and a mistake. She almost has zero credibility. She just can’t let go, and exit the stage gracefully.
I live in Atlanta, and I’m very familiar with her irrational behavior and explosive temper. I think she needs to take an anger management class. I’m glad she’s gone. I’m a liberal and she’s a liberal, but I’m glad she’s gone. She was a negative to the Democratic Party.
John
December 9th, 2006 at 1:31 amNixon resigned at 26%
I expect soon-to-be indicted Gonzales to get the boot pretty soon.
Any pools on Dick the Dick?
Soon there will be just the shadow of the shadow of a man who was the first Preznit of the United States.
Gen. Franks told the Bahrainis that GFH Bush was a Man of Steel.
Oilcan Jr.
If only he had a heart.
December 9th, 2006 at 2:18 amCynthia McKinney was on the right side of the war issue the whole way down the road. She is funny, irreverent, lively, and proud. That bastard who accosted her at the House should have been fired if not arrested.
Long Live Cynthia McKinney. To call her (certainly deserved) action of filing a bill of impeachment symbolically, IN NO WAY can that be called ‘vengeful.’
Another proud act, albeit symbolic, but quite like the NAY vote of Barbara Lee on the Afghanistan authorization, which has ALSO been a disaster.
Bush has done the crimes — he should be impeached from any standard of justice. Politics, however, is also important, and resignation will serve as well as impeachment.
December 9th, 2006 at 2:24 amBush makes his way to the twenties
December 9th, 2006 at 4:57 amIn regards to #4’s response . . . a mirror.
December 9th, 2006 at 8:00 amAre 30% of Americans on PROZAC
December 9th, 2006 at 9:27 amThe Democrats have a moral obligation to impeach this president. The Republican Congress impeached President Clinton when his approval ratings were hovering around 60 percent for a trumped up perjury trap. Even OJ Simpson a murderer was allowed to commit perjury during his civil trial without any legal repurcussions.
Alan Simpson on C-Span: “We could have gotten a 100 to 0 vote if we had censured President Clinton but no, others had to go for blood”.
At the very least, this Congress needs to censure Bush if he doesn’t lay out a plan to get our troops out of Iraq by the time they come back into session next year.
After the censure, they should only approve funds for the war that will be used to bring our troops home. If after that, Dictator Bush doesn’t get them out of that immoral hellhole, then they should start impeachment hearings.
It should also be made clear that Cheney either resign his position or he will be impeached also after he takes the oath of office. Who should be sitting in the wings to take over as Commander In Chief? It should be Chuck Hagel, a real soldier who would do whatever it takes to get us out of Iraq.
December 9th, 2006 at 9:43 amLeave the man that made me $7,000,000 and counting alone.
Comment by angelina from Ga
Damn, I bet you had to suck a LOT of neo-con d*ck to get that kind of money!!!!! You go girl!!:D
December 9th, 2006 at 9:58 amI live in Atlanta, and I’m very familiar with her irrational behavior and explosive temper. I think she needs to take an anger management class. I’m glad she’s gone. I’m a liberal and she’s a liberal, but I’m glad she’s gone. She was a negative to the Democratic Party.
John
I bet you wouldn’t say that to her face. You’ll probably get your ass kicked in.
December 9th, 2006 at 10:03 amFor those who have never had the pleasure of watching him fall:
http://www.planetdan.net/pics/misc/georgie.htm
Give him a shove if he gets stuck!
December 9th, 2006 at 10:09 amBush approval rating at all time low?
It’s not at an all time low yet.
December 9th, 2006 at 10:16 amRabbit
That 30% approval rating is just all part of the 13 state GOP plan to represent the old Confederacy — the smaller their base shrinks, the more unrepresentative the party will become. Pretty soon it will just be made up of Angies of the world and Dick Cheney.
December 9th, 2006 at 10:45 amHeil, der Shrubinator!
What a PATHETIC loser.
He confuses being a strong leader with shoving his head up his arse.
December 9th, 2006 at 1:08 pmSneaver is a sad little thing, lost the election by a landslide and now whimpers about matching sox.
December 9th, 2006 at 1:42 pmReminds me of gollum.
I wonder if Angie from Georgia has ever read of King Midas? He had all the gold he wanted, but nothing else.
December 9th, 2006 at 2:04 pmHay Marie, seem’s pretty unreasonable that someone with that suposed kind of money would be spending their time here and using a screen name like that….I think it is a southern inbred, skin head teen ager playing with mom’s computer…Or one in a juvie somewhere with library privlages….No adult, rich, well bred person would waste their time with such drivel as this troll doe’s…Blessings
December 9th, 2006 at 3:44 pmBet you get a bingo! for that one, Sharon! I think you’re right.
December 9th, 2006 at 6:11 pmDoes it seem to anyone else that the pasted-in rantings of our resident trolls are becoming more and more incoherent? I guess this is probably little more than a pathetic attempt to gum up the threads. Pretty annoying.
December 9th, 2006 at 11:55 pmIf you people can OPENLY,and I mean “OPENLY” blaspheme the word of GOD on this site,and then laugh about it,and no one,NOT ONE! stands up for the Lord Our Savior,not to mention running off people with non (neo) conservative views looking for a better way,then I can SURELY post here anything that I so desire. Wouldn`t you agree?
No?
Too bad. Go ahead and TRY to stop me.I dare you. I really do.
I`ll have your pompous,heathenistic site shut down so fast,it will make your wildest 60`s
hallucination seem like a trip to the candy store.
Go ahead and push my “legal” hand, I dare you.
And I`m a Democrat! A southern Democrat!
You people need to go Independent Party.You are giving Democrats a bad name.
F@CK YOU and your “indoctrination”
angie in Ga.
December 10th, 2006 at 10:01 am“I`ll have your pompous,heathenistic site shut down so fast,it will make your wildest 60`s
hallucination seem like a trip to the candy store.”
Have it YHWH.
December 10th, 2006 at 12:35 pmSay Marie, are you still areound.?..Remember my last post.?…It appear’s the troll made my case..The child is now making threat’s and demand’s…Teen age skin head’s are not worth our time, I will no longer respond to it’s insane fit’s…..Blessings
December 10th, 2006 at 1:07 pmTeen Girls Black Teens Kiss Lesbian Teen
I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view
March 16th, 2008 at 2:33 pmYoung Girls Young Teens Angus Young
I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view
March 18th, 2008 at 4:56 pmTeen Girls Teen Mpeg Ass Teen
I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view
March 27th, 2008 at 8:24 amYoung Girls Young Girl Models Young Puffy Nipple
I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view
March 27th, 2008 at 2:24 pmYoung Girls Youngest Boys Gallery Young Girls Naked
I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view
March 28th, 2008 at 4:20 pmTeen Girls Teen Chat Teen Panties
I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view
March 31st, 2008 at 12:57 pmNaked Girls Naked Young Girl Naked Teen Girls
I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view
April 9th, 2008 at 6:52 amBlack Pussy Black Lesbian Porn Fat Black Pussy
I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view
April 9th, 2008 at 10:36 amLesbians Girls Lesbians Teen Lesbians
I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view
April 11th, 2008 at 12:48 amcrave records
Didn’t realise there was this type of information out there
April 11th, 2008 at 10:28 amTeen Girls Teen Titans Hentai Teen Girls That Are Hot
I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view
April 11th, 2008 at 8:56 pmTeen Teens For Cash Nudist Teens
I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view
April 12th, 2008 at 2:18 pmLesbians Lesbian Girls Lesbian Twins
I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view
April 12th, 2008 at 4:30 pmNaked Girls Naked Black Men Girls Naked
I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view
April 13th, 2008 at 3:25 amGay Incest Gay Cumshots Gay Jock
I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view
April 13th, 2008 at 10:55 amPreteen Preteen Model Galleries Pre-Teen
I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view
April 13th, 2008 at 8:15 pmGay Sex Gay Ass Gay Ass
I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view
April 14th, 2008 at 5:25 amAll about Digimon Adventure Online Game. Digimon Adventure Fans Blog….
…Digimon is a small virtual pet. You can download and play an online RPG in the Digimon universe. It looks and feels like 2D graphic RPG adventure. You can train and level up your Digimon, make hundreds of quests, and travel through a huge universe a…
March 10th, 2009 at 8:37 pmShag Hairstyles and Haircuts…
shag hairstyle basically gotits name from the word “shaggy” since …once the hair is cutand layered it gives off a shaggy look. The shag hairstyle has always been apopular hairstyle, and there are plenty ofshag hairstyles to choose from…
April 11th, 2009 at 11:07 am