<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush&#8217;s New Strategy: Copy The &#8216;Success&#8217; of Vietnam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:57:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Think Progress &#187; White House Unable To Find A &#8216;War Czar&#8217; To Own Bush&#8217;s Iraq Failures</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/comment-page-2/#comment-3657654</link>
		<dc:creator>Think Progress &#187; White House Unable To Find A &#8216;War Czar&#8217; To Own Bush&#8217;s Iraq Failures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/#comment-3657654</guid>
		<description>[...] administration ally and escalation proponent:   Retired Army Gen. Jack Keane: Keane is an &#8220;influential member of the Pentagon&#8217;s Defense Policy Board&#8221; who met with President Bush in December and convinced him to send more troops to Iraq. He [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] administration ally and escalation proponent:   Retired Army Gen. Jack Keane: Keane is an &#8220;influential member of the Pentagon&#8217;s Defense Policy Board&#8221; who met with President Bush in December and convinced him to send more troops to Iraq. He [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3657654', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MUTT</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/comment-page-2/#comment-1298219</link>
		<dc:creator>MUTT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 19:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/#comment-1298219</guid>
		<description>yup- I was there. We &quot;lost&quot;. Saw it w/ my own two eyes. Bad model for future butchery. 
As was mentioned above, Truman got us in on the side of the French by &#039;50. The reason is an interesting story. After War 2, the French wanted to do the same idiot thing that led to Hitler et al- strip Germany of all wealth, phone poles, manufactory, railroads- reduce it to a peasant nation of serfs. EVERYBODY else thought that a really stupid idea. The French were adamant. They wanted to exploit cheap labor &amp; raw materials to rebuild France, which was pretty beat up. We wanted the Marshall Plan. So, the French were bought off by the US promising them Viet cheap labor &amp; Viet raw materials, which the French could profit from, sending raw materials to Japan, to keep THEM buggers busy, since everyone was still scared of them, even in defeat. 
Stupidity heaped on stupidity. And Fred Barnes pulls down the Big Bucks.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yup- I was there. We &#8220;lost&#8221;. Saw it w/ my own two eyes. Bad model for future butchery.<br />
As was mentioned above, Truman got us in on the side of the French by &#8216;50. The reason is an interesting story. After War 2, the French wanted to do the same idiot thing that led to Hitler et al- strip Germany of all wealth, phone poles, manufactory, railroads- reduce it to a peasant nation of serfs. EVERYBODY else thought that a really stupid idea. The French were adamant. They wanted to exploit cheap labor &amp; raw materials to rebuild France, which was pretty beat up. We wanted the Marshall Plan. So, the French were bought off by the US promising them Viet cheap labor &amp; Viet raw materials, which the French could profit from, sending raw materials to Japan, to keep THEM buggers busy, since everyone was still scared of them, even in defeat.<br />
Stupidity heaped on stupidity. And Fred Barnes pulls down the Big Bucks&#8230;..<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1298219', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/comment-page-2/#comment-1295261</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 07:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/#comment-1295261</guid>
		<description>We only lost vietnam because of the traiterous fifth column of </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We only lost vietnam because of the traiterous fifth column of<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1295261', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cartoons Fans Lounge</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/comment-page-2/#comment-1293993</link>
		<dc:creator>Cartoons Fans Lounge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/#comment-1293993</guid>
		<description>[...] story   No Comments so far  Leave a comment   RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI    Leave a comment Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTMLallowed: &lt;a href=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;abbr title=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;acronym title=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;b&gt; &lt;blockquote cite=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;code&gt; &lt;em&gt; &lt;i&gt; &lt;strike&gt; &lt;strong&gt; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] story   No Comments so far  Leave a comment   RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI    Leave a comment Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTMLallowed: &lt;a href=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;abbr title=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;acronym title=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;b&gt; &lt;blockquote cite=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;code&gt; &lt;em&gt; &lt;i&gt; &lt;strike&gt; &lt;strong&gt; [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1293993', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chichi</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/comment-page-2/#comment-1293411</link>
		<dc:creator>chichi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 01:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/#comment-1293411</guid>
		<description>#76,#77: I can see US &quot;won&quot; and &quot;winning&quot; that way. But wait, it is a Imperialist victory not a Freedom victory. You can think US &quot;won&quot; but American &quot;lost&quot;, because the country lost her way, lost her value. US &quot;won&quot; but SouthVNese who fought besides American feel be betrayed because US was only for her interests (1 of reasons SouthVNese govt hard to got support from their own ppl)

British in South African? Why you not try Irish War of Independence? 

For who support the idea extreme violence will lead victory, check Soviet war in Afghanistan. They didn&#039;t have liberals, media, elections, and limitation in humanity but they still lost.

&lt;blockquote&gt;International condemnation arose due to the alleged killings of civilians in any areas where Mujahideen were suspected of operating. The inability of the Soviet Union to break the military stalemate, gain a significant number of Afghan supporters and affiliates, or to rebuild the Afghan Army, required the increasing direct use of its own forces to fight the rebels. Soviet soldiers often found themselves fighting against civilians due to the elusive tactics of the rebels. They did repeat many of the American Vietnam mistakes, winning almost all of the conventional battles, but failing to control the countryside.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#76,#77: I can see US &#8220;won&#8221; and &#8220;winning&#8221; that way. But wait, it is a Imperialist victory not a Freedom victory. You can think US &#8220;won&#8221; but American &#8220;lost&#8221;, because the country lost her way, lost her value. US &#8220;won&#8221; but SouthVNese who fought besides American feel be betrayed because US was only for her interests (1 of reasons SouthVNese govt hard to got support from their own ppl)</p>
<p>British in South African? Why you not try Irish War of Independence? </p>
<p>For who support the idea extreme violence will lead victory, check Soviet war in Afghanistan. They didn&#8217;t have liberals, media, elections, and limitation in humanity but they still lost.</p>
<blockquote><p>International condemnation arose due to the alleged killings of civilians in any areas where Mujahideen were suspected of operating. The inability of the Soviet Union to break the military stalemate, gain a significant number of Afghan supporters and affiliates, or to rebuild the Afghan Army, required the increasing direct use of its own forces to fight the rebels. Soviet soldiers often found themselves fighting against civilians due to the elusive tactics of the rebels. They did repeat many of the American Vietnam mistakes, winning almost all of the conventional battles, but failing to control the countryside.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1293411', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damo555</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/comment-page-2/#comment-1292883</link>
		<dc:creator>Damo555</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 23:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/#comment-1292883</guid>
		<description>@ Matthew C. Tedder

Taken for a ride? Are you completely high? Who got taken for a ride? The US went in and destroyed that country, precipitated a civil war and you say the US is being taken for a ride? Thats like robbing a store and being angry with the owner for not saying thank you when you&#039;re running out the door. Its also interesting you advocate turning neighborhoods into concentration camps/prisons as in the Boer war. You think the British had the right idea. Wow. The Brits - the most vicious imperialists next to Ghengis Kahn. Try saying that to a South African of Boer descent or an Irish person and see what answer you get.

Also Matthew, here&#039;s an newsflash - Fallujah was destroyed - 90% of the buldings were flattened. Are you going to start saying they had to destroy Fallujah in order to save it?

Your arrogance is astounding. You talk about &#039;handing a fairer piece of power to Sunnis&#039;. Does it even dawn on you that the basic assumption that the US decides who gets what power in a country thousands of miles away is the height of condescension. 

Wake up man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Matthew C. Tedder</p>
<p>Taken for a ride? Are you completely high? Who got taken for a ride? The US went in and destroyed that country, precipitated a civil war and you say the US is being taken for a ride? Thats like robbing a store and being angry with the owner for not saying thank you when you&#8217;re running out the door. Its also interesting you advocate turning neighborhoods into concentration camps/prisons as in the Boer war. You think the British had the right idea. Wow. The Brits &#8211; the most vicious imperialists next to Ghengis Kahn. Try saying that to a South African of Boer descent or an Irish person and see what answer you get.</p>
<p>Also Matthew, here&#8217;s an newsflash &#8211; Fallujah was destroyed &#8211; 90% of the buldings were flattened. Are you going to start saying they had to destroy Fallujah in order to save it?</p>
<p>Your arrogance is astounding. You talk about &#8216;handing a fairer piece of power to Sunnis&#8217;. Does it even dawn on you that the basic assumption that the US decides who gets what power in a country thousands of miles away is the height of condescension. </p>
<p>Wake up man.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1292883', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: borat</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/comment-page-2/#comment-1292700</link>
		<dc:creator>borat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 22:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/#comment-1292700</guid>
		<description>&quot;Great Success!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Great Success!&#8221;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1292700', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew C. Tedder</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/comment-page-2/#comment-1292636</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew C. Tedder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 22:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/#comment-1292636</guid>
		<description>Still.. Many lessons were learned from the failures of Vietnam.  No Ho Chi Min trail exists for Iraq--foreign insurgents are far less numerous.

I strongly suggest taking the British approach in South Africa in the Boor wars.  That is, fence off and clear neighborhood by neighborhood thuroughly.  Allow the residents back into their neighborhoods gated, with ID cards.  This approach, in fact, generally worked in Fallujah.  Do it also in Sadr City and Ramadi.  This mess isn&#039;t nearly as big and pores as it was in the Boor wars.  This is a military solution that can work--at least for the short term.  Solving the political will mean handing a fairer piece of power to Sunnis.  The Shias really are, as Sunnis claim, dominating power and handing over influence to Iran.  All major groups need fair representation, inspite of who is the ethnic majority--that is what a constitutional democracy should provide, and isn&#039;t.

I think the U.S. is being taken for a ride by the Shias.  I think they all want us to suffer before we leave so they can get away with anything, thereafter--without us coming back.  Sunnis know this.

Matthew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still.. Many lessons were learned from the failures of Vietnam.  No Ho Chi Min trail exists for Iraq&#8211;foreign insurgents are far less numerous.</p>
<p>I strongly suggest taking the British approach in South Africa in the Boor wars.  That is, fence off and clear neighborhood by neighborhood thuroughly.  Allow the residents back into their neighborhoods gated, with ID cards.  This approach, in fact, generally worked in Fallujah.  Do it also in Sadr City and Ramadi.  This mess isn&#8217;t nearly as big and pores as it was in the Boor wars.  This is a military solution that can work&#8211;at least for the short term.  Solving the political will mean handing a fairer piece of power to Sunnis.  The Shias really are, as Sunnis claim, dominating power and handing over influence to Iran.  All major groups need fair representation, inspite of who is the ethnic majority&#8211;that is what a constitutional democracy should provide, and isn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I think the U.S. is being taken for a ride by the Shias.  I think they all want us to suffer before we leave so they can get away with anything, thereafter&#8211;without us coming back.  Sunnis know this.</p>
<p>Matthew<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1292636', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damo555</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/comment-page-2/#comment-1292581</link>
		<dc:creator>Damo555</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 22:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/#comment-1292581</guid>
		<description>The US won in Vietnam and is winning in Iraq. Its obvious. Why? To win is to &#039;domesticate&#039; or destroy. Domesticating means you successfully install a client regime compliant to your will. If that does not work you destroy the country. Vietnam got destroyed and as such that made the US intervention there a massive success - Vitenam was no threat to anyone after being bombed back to the stone age. If the US had not gone into Iraq the Russian and Chinese would have partnered with Iraq to get the oil. They would have switched from the dollar to the Euro to trade oil. Once that happens its bye-bye US economy (eveyone would call in the reserves). If Iraq becomes a civil-war torn basket case these war planners don&#039;t care. Its still a win. No-one getting the oil is better than someone other than the US getting it. You have to remember that the cost to human life does not even enter into it. Thats how these people think. All of you arguing about the rights and wrongs of this are delusional. The people who plan this see Iraq in and US &#039;interests&#039; in  abstract terms - in the same way you would look at an ant-hill blocking your driveway. They know that the only card the US can play is extreme violence - otherwise everyone would just tell them to get lost. The thing Bush is most afraid of is democracy. Even a child could see that. That said, the writing is on the wall - as the recent US elections have attested. The current adminstrations&#039; shenanigans are beginning sound like dying gasps of a vicious plutocracy. People are finally seeing them for what they are. Roll on 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US won in Vietnam and is winning in Iraq. Its obvious. Why? To win is to &#8216;domesticate&#8217; or destroy. Domesticating means you successfully install a client regime compliant to your will. If that does not work you destroy the country. Vietnam got destroyed and as such that made the US intervention there a massive success &#8211; Vitenam was no threat to anyone after being bombed back to the stone age. If the US had not gone into Iraq the Russian and Chinese would have partnered with Iraq to get the oil. They would have switched from the dollar to the Euro to trade oil. Once that happens its bye-bye US economy (eveyone would call in the reserves). If Iraq becomes a civil-war torn basket case these war planners don&#8217;t care. Its still a win. No-one getting the oil is better than someone other than the US getting it. You have to remember that the cost to human life does not even enter into it. Thats how these people think. All of you arguing about the rights and wrongs of this are delusional. The people who plan this see Iraq in and US &#8216;interests&#8217; in  abstract terms &#8211; in the same way you would look at an ant-hill blocking your driveway. They know that the only card the US can play is extreme violence &#8211; otherwise everyone would just tell them to get lost. The thing Bush is most afraid of is democracy. Even a child could see that. That said, the writing is on the wall &#8211; as the recent US elections have attested. The current adminstrations&#8217; shenanigans are beginning sound like dying gasps of a vicious plutocracy. People are finally seeing them for what they are. Roll on 2008.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1292581', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bushâ€™s New Strategy: Copy The â€˜Successâ€™ of Vietnam at innerangst.net</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/comment-page-2/#comment-1292409</link>
		<dc:creator>Bushâ€™s New Strategy: Copy The â€˜Successâ€™ of Vietnam at innerangst.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 21:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/#comment-1292409</guid>
		<description>[...] read more&#160;&#124;&#160;digg story    Filed under: Uncategorized  &#160;&#160;&#124;&#160;&#160; Tags: . [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more&nbsp;|&nbsp;digg story    Filed under: Uncategorized  &nbsp;&nbsp;|&nbsp;&nbsp; Tags: . [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1292409', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UnieBoy</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/comment-page-2/#comment-1292389</link>
		<dc:creator>UnieBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 21:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/#comment-1292389</guid>
		<description>LBJ made up the Tonkin Gulf lie to get the American people to agree to attack N Viet Nam so the &#039;commies wont be attacking the shores of San Francisco&#039;. Nixon followed with more lies to keep us in &#039;Nam. We lost, esp. the 54,000 GIs who got killed. An irony is that later it took the commie Vietnamese to stop fellow commie Pol Pot&#039;s murdering of the population of Cambodia. The ragtag Vietnamese army had to invade and then stay in Cambodia for about 6 years to keep down the Khmer Rouge for good, and then march back to Viet Nam and continue their poverty. We had 550,000 troops in &#039;Nam at the 1969 peak, plus tens of thousands more on ships, in Thailand, Taiwan, Guam, Haiwaii and Japan in direct support-and we lost. You can&#039;t beat guerillas on their own territory, can you? We can&#039;t &quot;win&quot; in Iraq, whatever that means. Let&#039;s get out of Iraq ASAP and let the Iranians, Kurds and Syrians be the Vietnamese invaders of Iraq, to occupy it and quell the &#039;guerillas&#039; there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LBJ made up the Tonkin Gulf lie to get the American people to agree to attack N Viet Nam so the &#8216;commies wont be attacking the shores of San Francisco&#8217;. Nixon followed with more lies to keep us in &#8216;Nam. We lost, esp. the 54,000 GIs who got killed. An irony is that later it took the commie Vietnamese to stop fellow commie Pol Pot&#8217;s murdering of the population of Cambodia. The ragtag Vietnamese army had to invade and then stay in Cambodia for about 6 years to keep down the Khmer Rouge for good, and then march back to Viet Nam and continue their poverty. We had 550,000 troops in &#8216;Nam at the 1969 peak, plus tens of thousands more on ships, in Thailand, Taiwan, Guam, Haiwaii and Japan in direct support-and we lost. You can&#8217;t beat guerillas on their own territory, can you? We can&#8217;t &#8220;win&#8221; in Iraq, whatever that means. Let&#8217;s get out of Iraq ASAP and let the Iranians, Kurds and Syrians be the Vietnamese invaders of Iraq, to occupy it and quell the &#8216;guerillas&#8217; there.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1292389', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oswald</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/comment-page-2/#comment-1292247</link>
		<dc:creator>Oswald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/#comment-1292247</guid>
		<description>I agree. Let&#039;s get out now and let the place implode into civil war. They deserve it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. Let&#8217;s get out now and let the place implode into civil war. They deserve it.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1292247', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rolandc</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/comment-page-2/#comment-1290740</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolandc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/#comment-1290740</guid>
		<description>bush&#039;s success in &#039;Nam consisted of him not having to go there ... remember the way this guy &#039;thinks&#039; ..  so for him that is another mission accomplished ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bush&#8217;s success in &#8216;Nam consisted of him not having to go there &#8230; remember the way this guy &#8216;thinks&#8217; ..  so for him that is another mission accomplished &#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1290740', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie Pool</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/comment-page-2/#comment-1289932</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie Pool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 10:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/#comment-1289932</guid>
		<description>The fact that wars cannot be won without passion is not going to help Kissinger. Blaming America&#039;s lack of righteous passion, necessary for fighting and winning wars is not going to change our opinions or make us feel guilty when we&#039;re passionately opposed to fighting an unrighteous war with Iraq in the first place. Kissinger is a sophomoric narcissist who thinks that Americans are a bunch of idiots that he can easily manipulate through guilt and shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that wars cannot be won without passion is not going to help Kissinger. Blaming America&#8217;s lack of righteous passion, necessary for fighting and winning wars is not going to change our opinions or make us feel guilty when we&#8217;re passionately opposed to fighting an unrighteous war with Iraq in the first place. Kissinger is a sophomoric narcissist who thinks that Americans are a bunch of idiots that he can easily manipulate through guilt and shame.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1289932', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doro</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/comment-page-2/#comment-1289732</link>
		<dc:creator>doro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 08:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/#comment-1289732</guid>
		<description>Another analogy which I find disturbing. 

a) Germany lost WWI because the army was &quot;stabbed in the back by the home front&quot;. So in WWII they had only to &quot;stick it out&quot; to win this time. The consequences are known.
b) Large german companies supported WWII and the argument about being &quot;stabbed in the back&quot;, because there was money to be made. Some of the owner&#039;s families are still abundantly rich.

Does this sound familiar to any of you?

End this war! And please vote for any candidate, who never supported this madness, even if they are really hard to find.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another analogy which I find disturbing. </p>
<p>a) Germany lost WWI because the army was &#8220;stabbed in the back by the home front&#8221;. So in WWII they had only to &#8220;stick it out&#8221; to win this time. The consequences are known.<br />
b) Large german companies supported WWII and the argument about being &#8220;stabbed in the back&#8221;, because there was money to be made. Some of the owner&#8217;s families are still abundantly rich.</p>
<p>Does this sound familiar to any of you?</p>
<p>End this war! And please vote for any candidate, who never supported this madness, even if they are really hard to find.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1289732', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuber</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/comment-page-2/#comment-1289473</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 06:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/#comment-1289473</guid>
		<description>#68 MM,
I was around during the Vietnam conflict and have also studied it as well as our post WWII foreign policies. Kissinger was a failure.  And that is fortunate because his agendas were dubious at best.

If you disagree then list off specific accomplishments that you feel Kissinger achieved that benefited humanity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#68 MM,<br />
I was around during the Vietnam conflict and have also studied it as well as our post WWII foreign policies. Kissinger was a failure.  And that is fortunate because his agendas were dubious at best.</p>
<p>If you disagree then list off specific accomplishments that you feel Kissinger achieved that benefited humanity.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1289473', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: memphis minnie</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/comment-page-2/#comment-1289334</link>
		<dc:creator>memphis minnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 06:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/#comment-1289334</guid>
		<description>Rick Perlstein is a Woodward butt-kisser and a big fan of all of his imaginary quotes from the death bed.  Perlstein was sipping mother&#039;s milk at the end of the war and is hardly an authority on Kissinger and the Vietnam war.

Great choice of references for your argument Judd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick Perlstein is a Woodward butt-kisser and a big fan of all of his imaginary quotes from the death bed.  Perlstein was sipping mother&#8217;s milk at the end of the war and is hardly an authority on Kissinger and the Vietnam war.</p>
<p>Great choice of references for your argument Judd.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1289334', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chichi</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/comment-page-2/#comment-1289170</link>
		<dc:creator>chichi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 04:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/#comment-1289170</guid>
		<description>Vietnam war was a thorny problem which US failed to solve. The conflict did not start from 1961 when US military advisers went to South VN. It started from 1950 when President Harry Truman began authorizing direct financial assistance to the French in the first Indochina war. Why US govt hated the independence for VNese? Almost American misled that SouthVn was the land of anti-communist. Actually, first communist parties formed at Saigon and one of first communist-led uprisings was the 1940 Cochinchina (south vietnam) Uprising. And the flag of Vietnam(NorthVN and united VN) designed by leaders of the Uprising http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Vietnam. At the end of 1944, the Viet Minh claimed a total membership of 500,000, of which 200,000 were in Tonkin(North VN), 150,000 in Annam, and 150,000 in Cochinchina (Annam and Cochinchina became later SouthVN). So number of communists in SouthVN might be even greater than in NorthVN before the war http://faculty.ed.umuc.edu/~nstanton/pent4.html
Moreover, Ngo Dinh Diem the first President of South Vietnam born in Quang Binh province part of &lt;strong&gt;North VN&lt;/strong&gt;!? While Le Duan leader of NorthVN (after Ho death) born in QuangTri province part of &lt;strong&gt;South VN&lt;/strong&gt;!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vietnam war was a thorny problem which US failed to solve. The conflict did not start from 1961 when US military advisers went to South VN. It started from 1950 when President Harry Truman began authorizing direct financial assistance to the French in the first Indochina war. Why US govt hated the independence for VNese? Almost American misled that SouthVn was the land of anti-communist. Actually, first communist parties formed at Saigon and one of first communist-led uprisings was the 1940 Cochinchina (south vietnam) Uprising. And the flag of Vietnam(NorthVN and united VN) designed by leaders of the Uprising <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Vietnam" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Vietnam</a>. At the end of 1944, the Viet Minh claimed a total membership of 500,000, of which 200,000 were in Tonkin(North VN), 150,000 in Annam, and 150,000 in Cochinchina (Annam and Cochinchina became later SouthVN). So number of communists in SouthVN might be even greater than in NorthVN before the war <a href="http://faculty.ed.umuc.edu/~nstanton/pent4.html" rel="nofollow">http://faculty.ed.umuc.edu/~nstanton/pent4.html</a><br />
Moreover, Ngo Dinh Diem the first President of South Vietnam born in Quang Binh province part of <strong>North VN</strong>!? While Le Duan leader of NorthVN (after Ho death) born in QuangTri province part of <strong>South VN</strong>!?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1289170', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unbelievable</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/comment-page-2/#comment-1288970</link>
		<dc:creator>unbelievable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 03:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/#comment-1288970</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;What would be different today if we â€œstayed the course and wonâ€ in Vietnam? anyone wanna tell me how much better something would be? 
Comment by ForTruth â€” December 18, 2006 @ 5:31 pm&lt;/em&gt;

Brilliant...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>What would be different today if we â€œstayed the course and wonâ€ in Vietnam? anyone wanna tell me how much better something would be?<br />
Comment by ForTruth â€” December 18, 2006 @ 5:31 pm</em></p>
<p>Brilliant&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1288970', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unbelievable</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/comment-page-2/#comment-1288966</link>
		<dc:creator>unbelievable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 03:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/18/iraq-vietnam-bush/#comment-1288966</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Bushâ€™s New Strategy: Copy The â€˜Successâ€™ of Vietnam &lt;/em&gt;

Shouldn&#039;t this be:

Bushâ€™s New &lt;em&gt;Strategery&lt;/em&gt;: Copy The â€˜Successâ€™ of Vietnam 

:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Bushâ€™s New Strategy: Copy The â€˜Successâ€™ of Vietnam </em></p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t this be:</p>
<p>Bushâ€™s New <em>Strategery</em>: Copy The â€˜Successâ€™ of Vietnam </p>
<p>:D<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1288966', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
