<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lieberman Officially Endores Escalation in Iraq</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:13:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/comment-page-3/#comment-1859920</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/#comment-1859920</guid>
		<description>Joe is a traitor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe is a traitor.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1859920', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Think Progress &#187; Lawmakers Speak Out Against Bush Escalation Plan</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/comment-page-3/#comment-1408233</link>
		<dc:creator>Think Progress &#187; Lawmakers Speak Out Against Bush Escalation Plan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 17:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/#comment-1408233</guid>
		<description>[...] Others have given their full support to the move:  Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT): &#8220;After speaking with our military commanders on the ground, I strongly believe that additional U.S. troops must be deployed to Baghdad.&#8221; [Hartford Courant, 12/21/06] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Others have given their full support to the move:  Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT): &#8220;After speaking with our military commanders on the ground, I strongly believe that additional U.S. troops must be deployed to Baghdad.&#8221; [Hartford Courant, 12/21/06] [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1408233', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JPark</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/comment-page-3/#comment-1314501</link>
		<dc:creator>JPark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 02:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/#comment-1314501</guid>
		<description>&quot;Lieberman officially endorses Eugenics&quot;  That would be about as surprising, though I don&#039;t think droopy dog would make the cut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Lieberman officially endorses Eugenics&#8221;  That would be about as surprising, though I don&#8217;t think droopy dog would make the cut.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1314501', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JPark</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/comment-page-3/#comment-1314427</link>
		<dc:creator>JPark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 02:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/#comment-1314427</guid>
		<description>And again, ban the overly wordy joes(non)logic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And again, ban the overly wordy joes(non)logic.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1314427', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JPark</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/comment-page-3/#comment-1314420</link>
		<dc:creator>JPark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 01:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/#comment-1314420</guid>
		<description>Sorry, TP. I am not a fan of the AIPAC conspiracy theories but this is Lieberman!!!!  Knock off the censorship!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, TP. I am not a fan of the AIPAC conspiracy theories but this is Lieberman!!!!  Knock off the censorship!!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1314420', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enoughlies</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/comment-page-3/#comment-1314248</link>
		<dc:creator>Enoughlies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 01:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/#comment-1314248</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t say Israel?
Censorship lets you know exactly WHO the guiltY ARE...and they are the worlds foremost censors of logical observation.

In the US THIS should be unacceptable to freedom honoring Americans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t say Israel?<br />
Censorship lets you know exactly WHO the guiltY ARE&#8230;and they are the worlds foremost censors of logical observation.</p>
<p>In the US THIS should be unacceptable to freedom honoring Americans.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1314248', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solomon</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/comment-page-3/#comment-1314124</link>
		<dc:creator>Solomon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 00:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/#comment-1314124</guid>
		<description>What is good for Israel has always been good for Lieberman. Unless the democrats remove him from his currenr ranking, he will be a major stumbling block in the peace making process of the Middle East.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is good for Israel has always been good for Lieberman. Unless the democrats remove him from his currenr ranking, he will be a major stumbling block in the peace making process of the Middle East.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1314124', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joeslogic</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/comment-page-3/#comment-1313866</link>
		<dc:creator>joeslogic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 23:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/#comment-1313866</guid>
		<description>At least Leiberman is not a wishy washy Demoncrat


Quote:
October 9th, 1999 Letter to President Clinton Signed by Senators Levin, Lieberman, Lautenberg, Dodd, Kerrey, Feinstein, Mikulski, Daschle, Breaux, Johnson, Inouye, Landrieu, Ford and Kerry â€” all Democrats 

â€œWe urge you, after consulting with Congress and consistent with the US Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions, including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraqâ€™s refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs.â€ 

Quote:
Joe Biden &gt; August 4, 2002
â€œThis is a guy who is an extreme danger to the world, and this is a guy who is in every way possible seeking weapons of mass destruction.â€ 

Quote:
Bill Clinton &gt; February 17, 1998 

â€œIf Saddam rejects peace, and we have to use force, our purpose is clear: We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraqâ€™s weapons of mass destruction program.â€ 

Quote: 

Chuck Schumer &gt; October 10, 2002
â€œIt is Husseinâ€™s vigorous pursuit of biological, chemical and nuclear weapons, and his present and future potential support for terrorist acts and organizations that make him a danger to the people of the united states.â€ 

Quote:
Madeleine Albright &gt; February 1, 1998 

â€œWe must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and the security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction.â€ 

Quote:
Nancy Pelosi &gt; December 16, 1998 

â€œSaddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology, which is a threat to countries in the region, and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.â€ 

Quote:
John Kerry &gt; January 23, 2003
â€œWithout question we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator leading an impressive regime. He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. And now heâ€™s miscalculating Americaâ€™s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. His consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction.â€ 

Quote:
Al Gore &gt; September 23, 2002 

â€œWe know that he has stored nuclear supplies, secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.â€ 

Quote:
Sandy Berger &gt; February 18, 1998 

â€œHeâ€™ll use those weapons of mass destruction again as he has 10 times since 1983.â€ 

Quote:
John Kerry &gt; October 9, 2002 

â€œI will be voting to give the president of the US the authority to use force if necessary to disarm Saddam because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security.â€ 

Quote:
Senator Carl Levin &gt; September 19, 2002 

â€œWe begin with a common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations, is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them.â€ 

Quote:
Ted Kennedy &gt; September 27, 2002 

â€œWe have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.â€ 

Quote:
Senator Hillary Clinton &gt; October 10, 2002 

â€œIn the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock. His missile delivery capability, his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists including Al-Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.â€ 

Quote:
Jay Rockefeller &gt; October 10, 2002 

â€œThere was unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years. We also should remember that we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction.â€ 

Quote:
Madeleine Albright &gt; November 10, 1999 

â€œHussein has chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies.â€ 

Quote:
Joe Biden &gt; August 4, 2002 

â€œ[H]e does have the capacity, as all terrorist-related operations do, of smuggling stuff into the United States and doing something terrible. That is true. But thereâ€™s been no connection, hard connection made yet between he and al-Qaida or his willingness or effort to do that thus far. Doesnâ€™t mean he wonâ€™t. This is a bad guy.â€ 

Quote:
Robert Byrd &gt; October 3, 2002 

â€œThe last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of â€˜98. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons.â€ 

Quote:
Madeline Albright &gt; February 18, 2002
Iraq is a long way from (here), but what happens there matters a great deal here, for the risk that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest national security threat we face â€” and it is a threat against which we must and will stand firm.â€ 

Quote:
Al Gore &gt; September 23, 2002 

â€œIraqâ€™s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter, and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.â€ 

Quote:
Jane Harman &gt; August 27, 2002
â€œI certainly think (Husseinâ€™s) developing nuclear capability which, fortunately, the Israelis set back 20 years ago with their preemptive attack which, in hindsight, looks pretty darn good.â€ 

Quote:
Joe Biden &gt; August 4, 2002
â€œI think he has anthrax. I have not seen any evidence that he has smallpox, but you hear them say, Tim (Russert), is the last smallpox outbreak in the world was in Iraq; ergo, he may have a strain.â€ 

Quote:
Dick Durbin &gt; September 30, 1999
â€œOne of the most compelling threats we in this country face today is the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Threat assessments regularly warn us of the possibility that North Korea, Iran, Iraq, or some other nation may acquire or develop nuclear weapons.â€ 

Quote:
Bill Clinton &gt; December 17, 1998
â€œEarlier today, I ordered Americaâ€™s armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraqâ€¦. Their mission is to attack Iraqâ€™s nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.â€ 

Quote:
Bill Nelson &gt; August 25, 2002
â€œ[M]y own personal view is, I think Saddam
has chemical and biological weapons,
and I expect that he is trying to develop
a nuclear weapon. So at some point,
we might have to act precipitously.â€ 

Quote:
Hillary Clinton &gt; October 10, 2002
â€œIn the four years since the inspections, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability and his nuclear program.â€ 

Quote:
Nancy Pelosi &gt; October 10, 2002
â€œYes, he has chemical weapons. Yes, he has biological weapons. He is trying to get nuclear weapons.â€ 

Quote:
Dick Gephardt &gt; September 23, 2002
â€œ(I have seen) a large body of intelligence information over a long time that he is working on and has weapons of mass destruction. Before 1991, he was close to a nuclear device. Now, youâ€™ll get a debate about whether itâ€™s one year away or five years away.â€ 

Quote:
Evan Bayh &gt; August 4, 2002
â€œIâ€™m inclined to support going in there and dealing with Saddam, but I think that case
needs to be made on a separate basis: his possession of biological and chemical weapons, his desire to get nuclear weapons, his proven track record of attacking his neighbors and others.â€ 

Quote:
Russell Feingold &gt; October 9, 2002
â€œWith regard to Iraq, I agree Iraq presents a genuine threat, especially in the form of weapons of mass destruction: chemical, biological and potentially nuclear weapons. I agree that Saddam Hussein is exceptionally dangerous and brutal, if not uniquely so, as the president argues.â€ 

Quote:
Bill Clinton &gt; February 17, 1998
â€œWe have to defend our future from these predators of the 21st Centuryâ€¦. They will be all the more lethal if we allow them to build arsenals of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them. We simply cannot allow that to happen. There is no more clear example of this threat than Saddam Hussein.â€ 

Quote:
Johnny Edwards &gt; January 7, 2003
â€œServing on the intelligence committee and seeing day after day, week after week, briefings on Saddamâ€™s weapons of mass destruction and his plans on using those weapons, he cannot be allowed to have nuclear weapons. Itâ€™s just that simple. The whole world changes if Saddam ever has nuclear weapons.â€ 

Quote:
Hillary Clinton &gt; January 22, 2003
â€œI voted for the Iraqi resolution. I consider the prospect of a nuclear-armed Saddam Hussein who can threaten not only his neighbors but the stability of the region and the world, a very serious threat to the United States.â€ 

Quote:
John Kerry &gt; January 31, 2003
â€œIf you donâ€™t believeâ€¦Saddam Hussein
is a threat with nuclear weapons, then
you shouldnâ€™t vote for me.â€ 

Quote: 

Joe Biden &gt; August 4, 2002
â€œWe know he continues to attempt to gain access to additional capability, including nuclear capability.â€ 

Quote:
Bill Nelson &gt; September 14, 2002
â€œI believe he has chemical and biological weapons. I think heâ€™s trying to develop nuclear weapons, and the fact that he might use those is a considerable threat to us.â€ 

Quote:
Johnny Edwards &gt; February 6, 2003
â€œThe question is whether weâ€™re going to allow this man whoâ€™s been developing weapons of mass destruction continue to develop weapons of mass destruction, get nuclear capability and get to the place where â€” if weâ€™re going to stop him if he invades a country around him â€” itâ€™ll cost millions of lives as opposed to thousands of lives.â€ 

Quote:
Al Gore &gt; September 23, 2002
â€œWe know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.â€ 

Quote:
Joe Biden &gt; August 4, 2002
â€œFirst of all, we donâ€™t know exactly what he has. Itâ€™s been five years since inspectors have been in there, number one. Number two, it is clear that he has residual of chemical weapons and biological weapons, number one.â€ 

Quote:
Tom Daschle &gt; February 11, 1998
â€œThe (Clinton) administration has said, â€˜Look, we have exhausted virtually our diplomatic effort to get the Iraqis to comply with their own agreements and with international law. Given that, what other option is there but to force them to do so?â€™ Thatâ€™s what theyâ€™re saying. This is the key question. And the answer is we donâ€™t have another option. We have got to force them to comply, and we are doing so militarily.â€ 

Quote:
Senator Bob Graham &gt; December 8, 2002 

â€œWe are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has and has had for a number of years a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.â€ 

Quote:
Bill Richardson &gt; May 29, 1998
â€œThe threat of nuclear proliferation is one of the big challenges that we have now, especially by states that have nuclear weapons, outlaw states like Iraq.â€ 

Quote:
John Kerry &gt; February 23, 1998
â€œSaddam Hussein has already used these weapons and has made it clear that he has the intent to continue to try, by virtue of his duplicity and secrecy, to continue to do so. That is a threat to the stability of the Middle East. It is a threat with respect to the potential of terrorist activities on a global basis. It is a threat even to regions near but not exactly in the Middle East.â€ 

Quote:
Hillary Clinton &gt; October 10, 2002
â€œIt is clear, however, that if left unchecked Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capability to wage biological and chemical warfare and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.â€ 

Quote:
Al Gore &gt; December 16, 1998
â€œ[I]f you allow someone like Saddam Hussein to get nuclear weapons, ballistic missiles, chemical weapons, biological weapons, how many people is he going to kill with such weapons? He has already demonstrated a willingness to use such weaponsâ€¦â€</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least Leiberman is not a wishy washy Demoncrat</p>
<p>Quote:<br />
October 9th, 1999 Letter to President Clinton Signed by Senators Levin, Lieberman, Lautenberg, Dodd, Kerrey, Feinstein, Mikulski, Daschle, Breaux, Johnson, Inouye, Landrieu, Ford and Kerry â€” all Democrats </p>
<p>â€œWe urge you, after consulting with Congress and consistent with the US Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions, including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraqâ€™s refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Joe Biden &gt; August 4, 2002<br />
â€œThis is a guy who is an extreme danger to the world, and this is a guy who is in every way possible seeking weapons of mass destruction.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Bill Clinton &gt; February 17, 1998 </p>
<p>â€œIf Saddam rejects peace, and we have to use force, our purpose is clear: We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraqâ€™s weapons of mass destruction program.â€ </p>
<p>Quote: </p>
<p>Chuck Schumer &gt; October 10, 2002<br />
â€œIt is Husseinâ€™s vigorous pursuit of biological, chemical and nuclear weapons, and his present and future potential support for terrorist acts and organizations that make him a danger to the people of the united states.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Madeleine Albright &gt; February 1, 1998 </p>
<p>â€œWe must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and the security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Nancy Pelosi &gt; December 16, 1998 </p>
<p>â€œSaddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology, which is a threat to countries in the region, and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
John Kerry &gt; January 23, 2003<br />
â€œWithout question we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator leading an impressive regime. He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. And now heâ€™s miscalculating Americaâ€™s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. His consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Al Gore &gt; September 23, 2002 </p>
<p>â€œWe know that he has stored nuclear supplies, secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Sandy Berger &gt; February 18, 1998 </p>
<p>â€œHeâ€™ll use those weapons of mass destruction again as he has 10 times since 1983.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
John Kerry &gt; October 9, 2002 </p>
<p>â€œI will be voting to give the president of the US the authority to use force if necessary to disarm Saddam because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Senator Carl Levin &gt; September 19, 2002 </p>
<p>â€œWe begin with a common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations, is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Ted Kennedy &gt; September 27, 2002 </p>
<p>â€œWe have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Senator Hillary Clinton &gt; October 10, 2002 </p>
<p>â€œIn the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock. His missile delivery capability, his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists including Al-Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Jay Rockefeller &gt; October 10, 2002 </p>
<p>â€œThere was unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years. We also should remember that we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Madeleine Albright &gt; November 10, 1999 </p>
<p>â€œHussein has chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Joe Biden &gt; August 4, 2002 </p>
<p>â€œ[H]e does have the capacity, as all terrorist-related operations do, of smuggling stuff into the United States and doing something terrible. That is true. But thereâ€™s been no connection, hard connection made yet between he and al-Qaida or his willingness or effort to do that thus far. Doesnâ€™t mean he wonâ€™t. This is a bad guy.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Robert Byrd &gt; October 3, 2002 </p>
<p>â€œThe last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of â€˜98. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Madeline Albright &gt; February 18, 2002<br />
Iraq is a long way from (here), but what happens there matters a great deal here, for the risk that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest national security threat we face â€” and it is a threat against which we must and will stand firm.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Al Gore &gt; September 23, 2002 </p>
<p>â€œIraqâ€™s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter, and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Jane Harman &gt; August 27, 2002<br />
â€œI certainly think (Husseinâ€™s) developing nuclear capability which, fortunately, the Israelis set back 20 years ago with their preemptive attack which, in hindsight, looks pretty darn good.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Joe Biden &gt; August 4, 2002<br />
â€œI think he has anthrax. I have not seen any evidence that he has smallpox, but you hear them say, Tim (Russert), is the last smallpox outbreak in the world was in Iraq; ergo, he may have a strain.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Dick Durbin &gt; September 30, 1999<br />
â€œOne of the most compelling threats we in this country face today is the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Threat assessments regularly warn us of the possibility that North Korea, Iran, Iraq, or some other nation may acquire or develop nuclear weapons.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Bill Clinton &gt; December 17, 1998<br />
â€œEarlier today, I ordered Americaâ€™s armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraqâ€¦. Their mission is to attack Iraqâ€™s nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Bill Nelson &gt; August 25, 2002<br />
â€œ[M]y own personal view is, I think Saddam<br />
has chemical and biological weapons,<br />
and I expect that he is trying to develop<br />
a nuclear weapon. So at some point,<br />
we might have to act precipitously.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Hillary Clinton &gt; October 10, 2002<br />
â€œIn the four years since the inspections, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability and his nuclear program.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Nancy Pelosi &gt; October 10, 2002<br />
â€œYes, he has chemical weapons. Yes, he has biological weapons. He is trying to get nuclear weapons.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Dick Gephardt &gt; September 23, 2002<br />
â€œ(I have seen) a large body of intelligence information over a long time that he is working on and has weapons of mass destruction. Before 1991, he was close to a nuclear device. Now, youâ€™ll get a debate about whether itâ€™s one year away or five years away.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Evan Bayh &gt; August 4, 2002<br />
â€œIâ€™m inclined to support going in there and dealing with Saddam, but I think that case<br />
needs to be made on a separate basis: his possession of biological and chemical weapons, his desire to get nuclear weapons, his proven track record of attacking his neighbors and others.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Russell Feingold &gt; October 9, 2002<br />
â€œWith regard to Iraq, I agree Iraq presents a genuine threat, especially in the form of weapons of mass destruction: chemical, biological and potentially nuclear weapons. I agree that Saddam Hussein is exceptionally dangerous and brutal, if not uniquely so, as the president argues.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Bill Clinton &gt; February 17, 1998<br />
â€œWe have to defend our future from these predators of the 21st Centuryâ€¦. They will be all the more lethal if we allow them to build arsenals of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them. We simply cannot allow that to happen. There is no more clear example of this threat than Saddam Hussein.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Johnny Edwards &gt; January 7, 2003<br />
â€œServing on the intelligence committee and seeing day after day, week after week, briefings on Saddamâ€™s weapons of mass destruction and his plans on using those weapons, he cannot be allowed to have nuclear weapons. Itâ€™s just that simple. The whole world changes if Saddam ever has nuclear weapons.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Hillary Clinton &gt; January 22, 2003<br />
â€œI voted for the Iraqi resolution. I consider the prospect of a nuclear-armed Saddam Hussein who can threaten not only his neighbors but the stability of the region and the world, a very serious threat to the United States.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
John Kerry &gt; January 31, 2003<br />
â€œIf you donâ€™t believeâ€¦Saddam Hussein<br />
is a threat with nuclear weapons, then<br />
you shouldnâ€™t vote for me.â€ </p>
<p>Quote: </p>
<p>Joe Biden &gt; August 4, 2002<br />
â€œWe know he continues to attempt to gain access to additional capability, including nuclear capability.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Bill Nelson &gt; September 14, 2002<br />
â€œI believe he has chemical and biological weapons. I think heâ€™s trying to develop nuclear weapons, and the fact that he might use those is a considerable threat to us.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Johnny Edwards &gt; February 6, 2003<br />
â€œThe question is whether weâ€™re going to allow this man whoâ€™s been developing weapons of mass destruction continue to develop weapons of mass destruction, get nuclear capability and get to the place where â€” if weâ€™re going to stop him if he invades a country around him â€” itâ€™ll cost millions of lives as opposed to thousands of lives.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Al Gore &gt; September 23, 2002<br />
â€œWe know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Joe Biden &gt; August 4, 2002<br />
â€œFirst of all, we donâ€™t know exactly what he has. Itâ€™s been five years since inspectors have been in there, number one. Number two, it is clear that he has residual of chemical weapons and biological weapons, number one.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Tom Daschle &gt; February 11, 1998<br />
â€œThe (Clinton) administration has said, â€˜Look, we have exhausted virtually our diplomatic effort to get the Iraqis to comply with their own agreements and with international law. Given that, what other option is there but to force them to do so?â€™ Thatâ€™s what theyâ€™re saying. This is the key question. And the answer is we donâ€™t have another option. We have got to force them to comply, and we are doing so militarily.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Senator Bob Graham &gt; December 8, 2002 </p>
<p>â€œWe are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has and has had for a number of years a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Bill Richardson &gt; May 29, 1998<br />
â€œThe threat of nuclear proliferation is one of the big challenges that we have now, especially by states that have nuclear weapons, outlaw states like Iraq.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
John Kerry &gt; February 23, 1998<br />
â€œSaddam Hussein has already used these weapons and has made it clear that he has the intent to continue to try, by virtue of his duplicity and secrecy, to continue to do so. That is a threat to the stability of the Middle East. It is a threat with respect to the potential of terrorist activities on a global basis. It is a threat even to regions near but not exactly in the Middle East.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Hillary Clinton &gt; October 10, 2002<br />
â€œIt is clear, however, that if left unchecked Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capability to wage biological and chemical warfare and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.â€ </p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Al Gore &gt; December 16, 1998<br />
â€œ[I]f you allow someone like Saddam Hussein to get nuclear weapons, ballistic missiles, chemical weapons, biological weapons, how many people is he going to kill with such weapons? He has already demonstrated a willingness to use such weaponsâ€¦â€<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1313866', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/comment-page-3/#comment-1313801</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 22:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/#comment-1313801</guid>
		<description>queek.  good post.  I can agree that much of the hatred of the west and America comes from our nefarious involvement in the middle east over the past decades.  And you can debate the blind support for Israel.  But, even when you take that into account, I am not willing to turn my back on the threat that is present today, just because many think we deserve it.  The threats to America and the west are real, because the world has changed.  I part ways with most here, because I don&#039;t believe that walking away from this threat is good for our security in the long run.  A war on terror may not be the best answer to these threats, but it seems more plausible to me than anything else that has been offer sofar.  The world has changed and we are being forced to address it whether we want to or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>queek.  good post.  I can agree that much of the hatred of the west and America comes from our nefarious involvement in the middle east over the past decades.  And you can debate the blind support for Israel.  But, even when you take that into account, I am not willing to turn my back on the threat that is present today, just because many think we deserve it.  The threats to America and the west are real, because the world has changed.  I part ways with most here, because I don&#8217;t believe that walking away from this threat is good for our security in the long run.  A war on terror may not be the best answer to these threats, but it seems more plausible to me than anything else that has been offer sofar.  The world has changed and we are being forced to address it whether we want to or not.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1313801', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LondonCalling</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/comment-page-3/#comment-1311998</link>
		<dc:creator>LondonCalling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/#comment-1311998</guid>
		<description>When the Twin Towers were hit people around the world were horrified and outraged. We all supported the US when she went after the the Taliban and Al Qeida to punish them for their collusion and crimes respectively. Then Bush stepped up to the plate and declared a war on terror and proceeded to apply the same terror tactics against the Iraqi people, innocent Canadian, German and British citizens and others around the world. It is as if your demented administration is concerned more about creating enemies and unseen nightmares to mobilise the basest instincts of the American people than to bring peace. I know for a fact 90% of Americans I have met are the decent and humane.  Now the likes of the bejowled Lieberman  announces his profane willingness and support for sending more  of America&#039;s young into the mayhem of Iraq. Soon enough the draft will be brought in and some rich, spoilt and incompetent future Dubya will use his father&#039;s influence to dodge the draft. The only maimed, dead or ruined solldiers will be from the poor, and disenfranchised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the Twin Towers were hit people around the world were horrified and outraged. We all supported the US when she went after the the Taliban and Al Qeida to punish them for their collusion and crimes respectively. Then Bush stepped up to the plate and declared a war on terror and proceeded to apply the same terror tactics against the Iraqi people, innocent Canadian, German and British citizens and others around the world. It is as if your demented administration is concerned more about creating enemies and unseen nightmares to mobilise the basest instincts of the American people than to bring peace. I know for a fact 90% of Americans I have met are the decent and humane.  Now the likes of the bejowled Lieberman  announces his profane willingness and support for sending more  of America&#8217;s young into the mayhem of Iraq. Soon enough the draft will be brought in and some rich, spoilt and incompetent future Dubya will use his father&#8217;s influence to dodge the draft. The only maimed, dead or ruined solldiers will be from the poor, and disenfranchised.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1311998', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: null</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/comment-page-3/#comment-1311739</link>
		<dc:creator>null</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/#comment-1311739</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d still like to know why these two spent so much time hanging around with bank swindler Chalabi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d still like to know why these two spent so much time hanging around with bank swindler Chalabi.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1311739', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/comment-page-3/#comment-1311605</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/#comment-1311605</guid>
		<description>Well it certainly does not surprise me that  Sen. Joe Lieberman is going to back more troops in Iraq.
 He is Jewish, and will back the wants of Israel, as Bush does, before he backs what is right for America.
 He hawked for a war with Iraq from day one.
 If you will check Sen. Joe Lieberman&#039;s record, He has consistently backed Israel in Congress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it certainly does not surprise me that  Sen. Joe Lieberman is going to back more troops in Iraq.<br />
 He is Jewish, and will back the wants of Israel, as Bush does, before he backs what is right for America.<br />
 He hawked for a war with Iraq from day one.<br />
 If you will check Sen. Joe Lieberman&#8217;s record, He has consistently backed Israel in Congress.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1311605', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/comment-page-3/#comment-1311512</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/#comment-1311512</guid>
		<description>The main reason for escalation of troop levels is so our military will be positioned and ready when we (under Israel&#039;s sway) attack Iran. 
Our troops are merely cannon fodder to this administration- nothing more. 9-11 part II, The Justification- coming to a town near you, is probably being fashioned by retiree Rumsfeild as we speak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main reason for escalation of troop levels is so our military will be positioned and ready when we (under Israel&#8217;s sway) attack Iran.<br />
Our troops are merely cannon fodder to this administration- nothing more. 9-11 part II, The Justification- coming to a town near you, is probably being fashioned by retiree Rumsfeild as we speak.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1311512', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: big papa</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/comment-page-3/#comment-1311465</link>
		<dc:creator>big papa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/#comment-1311465</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Joe&#039;s family&#039;s karma?

Kaput!&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Joe&#8217;s family&#8217;s karma?</p>
<p>Kaput!</strong><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1311465', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lokis</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/comment-page-3/#comment-1311388</link>
		<dc:creator>Lokis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/#comment-1311388</guid>
		<description>We can only pray that your duly elected President can be effective on this War on Terror as Amerika&#039;s War on Drugs.  God Bless from Kanada</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can only pray that your duly elected President can be effective on this War on Terror as Amerika&#8217;s War on Drugs.  God Bless from Kanada<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1311388', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darin Barrows</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/comment-page-3/#comment-1311367</link>
		<dc:creator>Darin Barrows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/#comment-1311367</guid>
		<description>These warmongering bastards don&#039;t care what we the people or the
military commanders think about ending these illegal, immoral, and un-
just occupations of both Iraq and the mostly forgotten Afghanistan.

So the escalation of the troop levels will most certainly end the violence
and win this mass murder war, right? Give me a frigging break!  As Rep.
Rangel has called for, institute the draft again and see how fast these
criminal politicians want to have perpetual wars with their children and
their constituents children called for action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These warmongering bastards don&#8217;t care what we the people or the<br />
military commanders think about ending these illegal, immoral, and un-<br />
just occupations of both Iraq and the mostly forgotten Afghanistan.</p>
<p>So the escalation of the troop levels will most certainly end the violence<br />
and win this mass murder war, right? Give me a frigging break!  As Rep.<br />
Rangel has called for, institute the draft again and see how fast these<br />
criminal politicians want to have perpetual wars with their children and<br />
their constituents children called for action.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1311367', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unbelievable</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/comment-page-3/#comment-1311045</link>
		<dc:creator>unbelievable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 14:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/#comment-1311045</guid>
		<description>Surprised?  Ah, no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surprised?  Ah, no.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1311045', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theswan</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/comment-page-3/#comment-1310980</link>
		<dc:creator>theswan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 14:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/#comment-1310980</guid>
		<description>Fighting a war for Israel.  Perpetual war and strife is the way of these blithering idiots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fighting a war for Israel.  Perpetual war and strife is the way of these blithering idiots.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1310980', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jericho</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/comment-page-3/#comment-1310597</link>
		<dc:creator>Jericho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 13:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/#comment-1310597</guid>
		<description>I strongly believe military commanders know more about this stuff than Lieberman. They know adding troops is useless. They also know there aren&#039;t enough troops being recruited since the start of this unholy war. The latest was that the US embassy in Iraq had only 6 employees who could speak Arab fluently. Like Rummy said: You fight with the army you have, not the one you wish to have. And these lunatics are prepared to sacrifice any soldier, no matter how ill-equipped. As if they are putting more wood onto a fire they decide with a stroke of a pen that your son will fight and risk his everything for nothing. Nice president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I strongly believe military commanders know more about this stuff than Lieberman. They know adding troops is useless. They also know there aren&#8217;t enough troops being recruited since the start of this unholy war. The latest was that the US embassy in Iraq had only 6 employees who could speak Arab fluently. Like Rummy said: You fight with the army you have, not the one you wish to have. And these lunatics are prepared to sacrifice any soldier, no matter how ill-equipped. As if they are putting more wood onto a fire they decide with a stroke of a pen that your son will fight and risk his everything for nothing. Nice president.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1310597', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: queek</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/comment-page-3/#comment-1310455</link>
		<dc:creator>queek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 13:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/21/lieberman-kagan/#comment-1310455</guid>
		<description>Paul, I don&#039;t have a clear answer for how to pull out, perhaps we propose reversing what the British did years ago and redivide the country?  In any scenario we have to get someone capable in our military to manage the the build up of their&#039;s.  If leaving Iraq now means  &quot;surrender&quot; then this can only mean we invaded them with the purpose of never leaving - Leaving means &quot;Mission Accomplished&quot; if we hand the controls over to Maliki.   

Going after bin Laded in Afghanistan seemed to make sense and we could have accomplished the mission of capturing him, but then Bush had to take care of what appeared to most of the world as unfinished business in Iraq.

What obvious is that we are creating more anti-American sentiment than ever before that will eventually come here in the form of violence and staying in Iraq is not doing anything except putting us in the position of killing innocents and getting our soldiers killed.

I am not sure if it was called the &quot;jihadist&quot; movement, but if it was in fact bin Laden who did 911 he and his ilk have a hatred for America that has roots tracable back to the 50&#039;s when we installed the Shah of Iran (to make their oil available) and then into the 80&#039;s when we were suppling Saddam with arms to fight Iran and at the same time we were selling arms (Iran Contra) to Iran.  The 80&#039;s were busy - we were also funding Bin Laden who part of his brother&#039;s gang fighting the Russians in Afghanistan.  There is a good time line at http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/.  (Then there&#039;s our mostly blind support of Israel&#039;s policies, a thorn in the side of every Muslim world wide, but that&#039;s a hot topic for another day)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, I don&#8217;t have a clear answer for how to pull out, perhaps we propose reversing what the British did years ago and redivide the country?  In any scenario we have to get someone capable in our military to manage the the build up of their&#8217;s.  If leaving Iraq now means  &#8220;surrender&#8221; then this can only mean we invaded them with the purpose of never leaving &#8211; Leaving means &#8220;Mission Accomplished&#8221; if we hand the controls over to Maliki.   </p>
<p>Going after bin Laded in Afghanistan seemed to make sense and we could have accomplished the mission of capturing him, but then Bush had to take care of what appeared to most of the world as unfinished business in Iraq.</p>
<p>What obvious is that we are creating more anti-American sentiment than ever before that will eventually come here in the form of violence and staying in Iraq is not doing anything except putting us in the position of killing innocents and getting our soldiers killed.</p>
<p>I am not sure if it was called the &#8220;jihadist&#8221; movement, but if it was in fact bin Laden who did 911 he and his ilk have a hatred for America that has roots tracable back to the 50&#8217;s when we installed the Shah of Iran (to make their oil available) and then into the 80&#8217;s when we were suppling Saddam with arms to fight Iran and at the same time we were selling arms (Iran Contra) to Iran.  The 80&#8217;s were busy &#8211; we were also funding Bin Laden who part of his brother&#8217;s gang fighting the Russians in Afghanistan.  There is a good time line at <a href="http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/</a>.  (Then there&#8217;s our mostly blind support of Israel&#8217;s policies, a thorn in the side of every Muslim world wide, but that&#8217;s a hot topic for another day)<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1310455', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
