No problem, just please refrain from throwing out the insults first and I won’t have to return fire.

What was the thead regarding back in November? I will do the searching.

OK, so since you called me a Bush shill you don’t think that is worth an apology from you?

“Yes, but you wrote that the first 100-hour agenda is BS because it has nothing to do with Iraq, didn’t you?”

From #406:

“Considering legislation that has to do with Iraq should be #1 on her list, and nothing else, but it’s not. That’s why I called it a BS agenda.”

“For the record, you took longer to apologize for the “your grammer sucks” remark”

For the correct record, not yours, I apologized in post #255 of this thread on Jan. 8, 2007 @12:05 a.m.:

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/05/senators-wrong-iraq/#comment-1424559

…which was well before you apologized to me on Jan. 8, 2007 @11:48 p.m. in this thread.

“I have better things to do, particularly since you are now simply resorting to other insults.”

After looking at your past history in regards to this….no you don’t.

Why Lora, you did turn out to be a Little Left Wing Narrow Minded Communist Party Member!!!! You are evidently one of those Demented DEMONcrats…… I can only Pity you and all the rest of your Party Members.

Note to the Administrators:
I think this troll has gone way beyond your Terms of Use agreement, and should be banned henceforth. Moreover, he is posting the same insulting message twice.

Dear Lora, your parents must be very unhappy that they wasted so much money on your secondary education since it it apparent that you turned out to be a Left Wing Liberal Dim Wit. It is no wonder because all of our Colleges and Universities are packed with these Left Wing Liberal Communist Professors, to BRAIN WASH vulnerable students like yourself… I guess you are a product of your Education….. If I were your parents I would DEMAND a FULL REFUND!!!!

Yes, but you wrote that the first 100-hour agenda is BS because it has nothing to do with Iraq, didn’t you? Please stop arguing in circles.
For the record, you took longer to apologize for the “your grammer sucks” remark, and now you’re repeatedly calling me a “coward” and “low-class individual” on another thread.
I don’t care whether you take my word for it or not. I remember it and even which thread it appeared on, so I’m not going to look it up for you. I have better things to do, particularly since you are now simply resorting to other insults. So さようなら。

Please don’t start sounding like that other jerks in this blog that do nothing but insult others. It’s not helpful, especially when they will call you on it by asking the administrators to ban you, even though you could go thru EVERY thread and find violator doing the same thing….easily.

“I already cited it in #242, as follows, “you called me a ‘bitch’ on an old thread about a proposal by Rep. Markey (D-MA) for port security being voted down by the Repugs in the House.””

Then post the link to the thread. I have no way to verify what you claim especially since your word isn’t worth much. Remember since you don’t do what you say you will do, I have to have something other than your word.

“As for the 100 hr. agenda, if Iraq has something to do with the War on Terror, as you neo-cons, like to claim, then implementing the 9/11 Commission’s recommendations is connected to Iraq.”

“Sorry, you can’t have it both ways.”

When did I say it wasn’t? You need to read my posts again, because I never said that the 9/11 Commission recommendations were not connected to the war in Iraq.

“And, BTW, the Repugs have had over four years to deal with the War in Iraq, but you seem to think the Democrats should do everything in the first 100 hours?”

No, I understand they are incapable of doing everthing in the first 100 hours, but again I was pointing out that it’s pretty sad that implimenting those 9/11 Commission recommendations aren’t at the very top of the list for the dems, considering they ran on pointing out the failures of the Bush Iraq policy.

“Sorry (you can take that as apology or not), but I chuckled exactly once spontaneously at a remark written by Jane Schneider.”

I do take it as an apology. Thank you. Why was that so hard for you to do?

You must live in a fantasyland if you can’t tell the difference between a real person (Pelosi) and a character in a 1950s movie. Get to a shrink soon.

Very well stated. Im sure Nevins is frantically visiting thesaurus.com for a response – Hirsute features crumpling in consternation over the grown up words he finds there..

Go back to poking twigs into termite mounds, Greg, you will be surprised and pleased by what attaches itself to the twig.

and we are all the lesser for that, stevie.

This is probably the wrong blog to be trolling for a mate though.