<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FACT CHECK: Congress Has Repeatedly Placed Limits On Military Deployments And Funding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:16:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Think Progress &#187; Do We Really Need An Emperor Bush?</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/comment-page-3/#comment-2171852</link>
		<dc:creator>Think Progress &#187; Do We Really Need An Emperor Bush?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 22:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/#comment-2171852</guid>
		<description>[...] as ThinkProgress has detailed, over the last 35 years, Congress has enacted numerous diverse bills that capped the size of military deployments, prohibited funding for existing or prospective [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as ThinkProgress has detailed, over the last 35 years, Congress has enacted numerous diverse bills that capped the size of military deployments, prohibited funding for existing or prospective [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=2171852', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Los Angeles Alcohol Rehabs The Price of Addiction. Bush and War &#171;</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/comment-page-3/#comment-2011827</link>
		<dc:creator>Los Angeles Alcohol Rehabs The Price of Addiction. Bush and War &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 00:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/#comment-2011827</guid>
		<description>[...] this is true.&#160; It seems Americans do not recall this action has been taken in the past. A new report from the Center for American Progress details how, over the last 35 years, Congress has passed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this is true.&nbsp; It seems Americans do not recall this action has been taken in the past. A new report from the Center for American Progress details how, over the last 35 years, Congress has passed [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=2011827', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/comment-page-3/#comment-1456140</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 19:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/#comment-1456140</guid>
		<description>He is more dangerous, Keith, than ever. He&#039;s feeling cornered and liable to do anything at all.  News is he&#039;s planning a strike on Iran before April, 2007.  You think that&#039;s a good idea?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is more dangerous, Keith, than ever. He&#8217;s feeling cornered and liable to do anything at all.  News is he&#8217;s planning a strike on Iran before April, 2007.  You think that&#8217;s a good idea?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1456140', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith H.</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/comment-page-3/#comment-1455086</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/#comment-1455086</guid>
		<description>Damn, there are still stories about GWB ?
Isn&#039;t his &#039;reign of terrrahh&#039; over with ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, there are still stories about GWB ?<br />
Isn&#8217;t his &#8216;reign of terrrahh&#8217; over with ?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1455086', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/comment-page-3/#comment-1449678</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 20:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/#comment-1449678</guid>
		<description>You know, #136 is right to hold all those people to their words, &lt;i&gt;except . .. &lt;/i&gt;  they were lied to.

Even with the lying, I was against the war.  They should have used some common sense instead of accepting the lies. 

Finally, sure the Congress can stop war activities if a president is ethical and follows the intent of the Constitution.  But, Bush doesn&#039;t do that. He thumbs his nose routinely at our Constitution and the Congress. He will do what he wants. Who can stop that?  We gonna put the man in jail?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, #136 is right to hold all those people to their words, <i>except . .. </i>  they were lied to.</p>
<p>Even with the lying, I was against the war.  They should have used some common sense instead of accepting the lies. </p>
<p>Finally, sure the Congress can stop war activities if a president is ethical and follows the intent of the Constitution.  But, Bush doesn&#8217;t do that. He thumbs his nose routinely at our Constitution and the Congress. He will do what he wants. Who can stop that?  We gonna put the man in jail?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1449678', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuzworld &#187; Archive &#187; Bush: I&#8217;m Sending More Troops To Iraq No Matter What Congress Does</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/comment-page-3/#comment-1449410</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuzworld &#187; Archive &#187; Bush: I&#8217;m Sending More Troops To Iraq No Matter What Congress Does</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/#comment-1449410</guid>
		<description>[...] Legal scholars on the right and left agree that Congress has the legal power to prevent an escalation or end the war completely. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Legal scholars on the right and left agree that Congress has the legal power to prevent an escalation or end the war completely. [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1449410', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joeslogic</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/comment-page-3/#comment-1434440</link>
		<dc:creator>joeslogic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/#comment-1434440</guid>
		<description>Yeah thatâ€™s right I misspelled a word. So they are all taken out of context and irrelevant right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah thatâ€™s right I misspelled a word. So they are all taken out of context and irrelevant right?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1434440', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joeslogic</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/comment-page-3/#comment-1434433</link>
		<dc:creator>joeslogic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/#comment-1434433</guid>
		<description>Well if Bush lied then I guess these people were lieing also: 

	&lt;strong&gt;Quote:
October 9th, 1999 Letter to President Clinton Signed by Senators Levin, Lieberman, Lautenberg, Dodd, Kerrey, Feinstein, Mikulski, Daschle, Breaux, Johnson, Inouye, Landrieu, Ford and Kerry â€” all Democrats 
â€œWe urge you, after consulting with Congress and consistent with the US Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions, including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraqâ€™s refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs.â€ 
Quote:
Joe Biden &gt; August 4, 2002
â€œThis is a guy who is an extreme danger to the world, and this is a guy who is in every way possible seeking weapons of mass destruction.â€ 
Quote:
Bill Clinton &gt; February 17, 1998 
â€œIf Saddam rejects peace, and we have to use force, our purpose is clear: We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraqâ€™s weapons of mass destruction program.â€ 
Quote: 
Chuck Schumer &gt; October 10, 2002
â€œIt is Husseinâ€™s vigorous pursuit of biological, chemical and nuclear weapons, and his present and future potential support for terrorist acts and organizations that make him a danger to the people of the united states.â€ 
Quote:
Madeleine Albright &gt; February 1, 1998 
â€œWe must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and the security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction.â€ 
Quote:
Nancy Pelosi &gt; December 16, 1998 
â€œSaddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology, which is a threat to countries in the region, and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.â€ 
Quote:
John Kerry &gt; January 23, 2003
â€œWithout question we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator leading an impressive regime. He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. And now heâ€™s miscalculating Americaâ€™s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. His consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction.â€ 
Quote:
Al Gore &gt; September 23, 2002 
â€œWe know that he has stored nuclear supplies, secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.â€ 
Quote:
Sandy Berger &gt; February 18, 1998 
â€œHeâ€™ll use those weapons of mass destruction again as he has 10 times since 1983.â€ 
Quote:
John Kerry &gt; October 9, 2002 
â€œI will be voting to give the president of the US the authority to use force if necessary to disarm Saddam because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security.â€ 
Quote:
Senator Carl Levin &gt; September 19, 2002 
â€œWe begin with a common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations, is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them.â€ 
Quote:
Ted Kennedy &gt; September 27, 2002 
â€œWe have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.â€ 
Quote:
Senator Hillary Clinton &gt; October 10, 2002 
â€œIn the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock. His missile delivery capability, his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists including Al-Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.â€ 
Quote:
Jay Rockefeller &gt; October 10, 2002 
â€œThere was unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years. We also should remember that we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction.â€ 
Quote:
Madeleine Albright &gt; November 10, 1999 
â€œHussein has chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies.â€ 
Quote:
Joe Biden &gt; August 4, 2002 
â€œ[H]e does have the capacity, as all terrorist-related operations do, of smuggling stuff into the United States and doing something terrible. That is true. But thereâ€™s been no connection, hard connection made yet between he and al-Qaida or his willingness or effort to do that thus far. Doesnâ€™t mean he wonâ€™t. This is a bad guy.â€ 
Quote:
Robert Byrd &gt; October 3, 2002 
â€œThe last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of â€˜98. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons.â€ 
Quote:
Madeline Albright &gt; February 18, 2002
Iraq is a long way from (here), but what happens there matters a great deal here, for the risk that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest national security threat we face â€” and it is a threat against which we must and will stand firm.â€ 
Quote:
Al Gore &gt; September 23, 2002 
â€œIraqâ€™s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter, and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.â€ 
Quote:
Jane Harman &gt; August 27, 2002
â€œI certainly think (Husseinâ€™s) developing nuclear capability which, fortunately, the Israelis set back 20 years ago with their preemptive attack which, in hindsight, looks pretty darn good.â€ 
Quote:
Joe Biden &gt; August 4, 2002
â€œI think he has anthrax. I have not seen any evidence that he has smallpox, but you hear them say, Tim (Russert), is the last smallpox outbreak in the world was in Iraq; ergo, he may have a strain.â€ 
Quote:
Dick Durbin &gt; September 30, 1999
â€œOne of the most compelling threats we in this country face today is the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Threat assessments regularly warn us of the possibility that North Korea, Iran, Iraq, or some other nation may acquire or develop nuclear weapons.â€ 
Quote:
Bill Clinton &gt; December 17, 1998
â€œEarlier today, I ordered Americaâ€™s armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraqâ€¦. Their mission is to attack Iraqâ€™s nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.â€ 
Quote:
Bill Nelson &gt; August 25, 2002
â€œ[M]y own personal view is, I think Saddam
has chemical and biological weapons,
and I expect that he is trying to develop
a nuclear weapon. So at some point,
we might have to act precipitously.â€ 
Quote:
Hillary Clinton &gt; October 10, 2002
â€œIn the four years since the inspections, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability and his nuclear program.â€ 
Quote:
Nancy Pelosi &gt; October 10, 2002
â€œYes, he has chemical weapons. Yes, he has biological weapons. He is trying to get nuclear weapons.â€ 
Quote:
Dick Gephardt &gt; September 23, 2002
â€œ(I have seen) a large body of intelligence information over a long time that he is working on and has weapons of mass destruction. Before 1991, he was close to a nuclear device. Now, youâ€™ll get a debate about whether itâ€™s one year away or five years away.â€ 
Quote:
Evan Bayh &gt; August 4, 2002
â€œIâ€™m inclined to support going in there and dealing with Saddam, but I think that case
needs to be made on a separate basis: his possession of biological and chemical weapons, his desire to get nuclear weapons, his proven track record of attacking his neighbors and others.â€ 
Quote:
Russell Feingold &gt; October 9, 2002
â€œWith regard to Iraq, I agree Iraq presents a genuine threat, especially in the form of weapons of mass destruction: chemical, biological and potentially nuclear weapons. I agree that Saddam Hussein is exceptionally dangerous and brutal, if not uniquely so, as the president argues.â€ 
Quote:
Bill Clinton &gt; February 17, 1998
â€œWe have to defend our future from these predators of the 21st Centuryâ€¦. They will be all the more lethal if we allow them to build arsenals of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them. We simply cannot allow that to happen. There is no more clear example of this threat than Saddam Hussein.â€ 
Quote:
Johnny Edwards &gt; January 7, 2003
â€œServing on the intelligence committee and seeing day after day, week after week, briefings on Saddamâ€™s weapons of mass destruction and his plans on using those weapons, he cannot be allowed to have nuclear weapons. Itâ€™s just that simple. The whole world changes if Saddam ever has nuclear weapons.â€ 
Quote:
Hillary Clinton &gt; January 22, 2003
â€œI voted for the Iraqi resolution. I consider the prospect of a nuclear-armed Saddam Hussein who can threaten not only his neighbors but the stability of the region and the world, a very serious threat to the United States.â€ 
Quote:
John Kerry &gt; January 31, 2003
â€œIf you donâ€™t believeâ€¦Saddam Hussein
is a threat with nuclear weapons, then
you shouldnâ€™t vote for me.â€ 
Quote: 
Joe Biden &gt; August 4, 2002
â€œWe know he continues to attempt to gain access to additional capability, including nuclear capability.â€ 
Quote:
Bill Nelson &gt; September 14, 2002
â€œI believe he has chemical and biological weapons. I think heâ€™s trying to develop nuclear weapons, and the fact that he might use those is a considerable threat to us.â€ 
Quote:
Johnny Edwards &gt; February 6, 2003
â€œThe question is whether weâ€™re going to allow this man whoâ€™s been developing weapons of mass destruction continue to develop weapons of mass destruction, get nuclear capability and get to the place where â€” if weâ€™re going to stop him if he invades a country around him â€” itâ€™ll cost millions of lives as opposed to thousands of lives.â€ 
Quote:
Al Gore &gt; September 23, 2002
â€œWe know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.â€ 
Quote:
Joe Biden &gt; August 4, 2002
â€œFirst of all, we donâ€™t know exactly what he has. Itâ€™s been five years since inspectors have been in there, number one. Number two, it is clear that he has residual of chemical weapons and biological weapons, number one.â€ 
Quote:
Tom Daschle &gt; February 11, 1998
â€œThe (Clinton) administration has said, â€˜Look, we have exhausted virtually our diplomatic effort to get the Iraqis to comply with their own agreements and with international law. Given that, what other option is there but to force them to do so?â€™ Thatâ€™s what theyâ€™re saying. This is the key question. And the answer is we donâ€™t have another option. We have got to force them to comply, and we are doing so militarily.â€ 
Quote:
Senator Bob Graham &gt; December 8, 2002 
â€œWe are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has and has had for a number of years a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.â€ 
Quote:
Bill Richardson &gt; May 29, 1998
â€œThe threat of nuclear proliferation is one of the big challenges that we have now, especially by states that have nuclear weapons, outlaw states like Iraq.â€ 
Quote:
John Kerry &gt; February 23, 1998
â€œSaddam Hussein has already used these weapons and has made it clear that he has the intent to continue to try, by virtue of his duplicity and secrecy, to continue to do so. That is a threat to the stability of the Middle East. It is a threat with respect to the potential of terrorist activities on a global basis. It is a threat even to regions near but not exactly in the Middle East.â€ 
Quote:
Hillary Clinton &gt; October 10, 2002
â€œIt is clear, however, that if left unchecked Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capability to wage biological and chemical warfare and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.â€ 
Quote:
Al Gore &gt; December 16, 1998
â€œ[I]f you allow someone like Saddam Hussein to get nuclear weapons, ballistic missiles, chemical weapons, biological weapons, how many people is he going to kill with such weapons? He has already demonstrated a willingness to use such weaponsâ€¦â€ &lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if Bush lied then I guess these people were lieing also: </p>
<p>	<strong>Quote:<br />
October 9th, 1999 Letter to President Clinton Signed by Senators Levin, Lieberman, Lautenberg, Dodd, Kerrey, Feinstein, Mikulski, Daschle, Breaux, Johnson, Inouye, Landrieu, Ford and Kerry â€” all Democrats<br />
â€œWe urge you, after consulting with Congress and consistent with the US Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions, including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraqâ€™s refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Joe Biden &gt; August 4, 2002<br />
â€œThis is a guy who is an extreme danger to the world, and this is a guy who is in every way possible seeking weapons of mass destruction.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Bill Clinton &gt; February 17, 1998<br />
â€œIf Saddam rejects peace, and we have to use force, our purpose is clear: We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraqâ€™s weapons of mass destruction program.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Chuck Schumer &gt; October 10, 2002<br />
â€œIt is Husseinâ€™s vigorous pursuit of biological, chemical and nuclear weapons, and his present and future potential support for terrorist acts and organizations that make him a danger to the people of the united states.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Madeleine Albright &gt; February 1, 1998<br />
â€œWe must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and the security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Nancy Pelosi &gt; December 16, 1998<br />
â€œSaddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology, which is a threat to countries in the region, and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
John Kerry &gt; January 23, 2003<br />
â€œWithout question we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator leading an impressive regime. He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. And now heâ€™s miscalculating Americaâ€™s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. His consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Al Gore &gt; September 23, 2002<br />
â€œWe know that he has stored nuclear supplies, secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Sandy Berger &gt; February 18, 1998<br />
â€œHeâ€™ll use those weapons of mass destruction again as he has 10 times since 1983.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
John Kerry &gt; October 9, 2002<br />
â€œI will be voting to give the president of the US the authority to use force if necessary to disarm Saddam because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Senator Carl Levin &gt; September 19, 2002<br />
â€œWe begin with a common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations, is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Ted Kennedy &gt; September 27, 2002<br />
â€œWe have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Senator Hillary Clinton &gt; October 10, 2002<br />
â€œIn the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock. His missile delivery capability, his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists including Al-Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Jay Rockefeller &gt; October 10, 2002<br />
â€œThere was unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years. We also should remember that we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Madeleine Albright &gt; November 10, 1999<br />
â€œHussein has chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Joe Biden &gt; August 4, 2002<br />
â€œ[H]e does have the capacity, as all terrorist-related operations do, of smuggling stuff into the United States and doing something terrible. That is true. But thereâ€™s been no connection, hard connection made yet between he and al-Qaida or his willingness or effort to do that thus far. Doesnâ€™t mean he wonâ€™t. This is a bad guy.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Robert Byrd &gt; October 3, 2002<br />
â€œThe last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of â€˜98. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Madeline Albright &gt; February 18, 2002<br />
Iraq is a long way from (here), but what happens there matters a great deal here, for the risk that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest national security threat we face â€” and it is a threat against which we must and will stand firm.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Al Gore &gt; September 23, 2002<br />
â€œIraqâ€™s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter, and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Jane Harman &gt; August 27, 2002<br />
â€œI certainly think (Husseinâ€™s) developing nuclear capability which, fortunately, the Israelis set back 20 years ago with their preemptive attack which, in hindsight, looks pretty darn good.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Joe Biden &gt; August 4, 2002<br />
â€œI think he has anthrax. I have not seen any evidence that he has smallpox, but you hear them say, Tim (Russert), is the last smallpox outbreak in the world was in Iraq; ergo, he may have a strain.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Dick Durbin &gt; September 30, 1999<br />
â€œOne of the most compelling threats we in this country face today is the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Threat assessments regularly warn us of the possibility that North Korea, Iran, Iraq, or some other nation may acquire or develop nuclear weapons.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Bill Clinton &gt; December 17, 1998<br />
â€œEarlier today, I ordered Americaâ€™s armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraqâ€¦. Their mission is to attack Iraqâ€™s nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Bill Nelson &gt; August 25, 2002<br />
â€œ[M]y own personal view is, I think Saddam<br />
has chemical and biological weapons,<br />
and I expect that he is trying to develop<br />
a nuclear weapon. So at some point,<br />
we might have to act precipitously.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Hillary Clinton &gt; October 10, 2002<br />
â€œIn the four years since the inspections, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability and his nuclear program.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Nancy Pelosi &gt; October 10, 2002<br />
â€œYes, he has chemical weapons. Yes, he has biological weapons. He is trying to get nuclear weapons.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Dick Gephardt &gt; September 23, 2002<br />
â€œ(I have seen) a large body of intelligence information over a long time that he is working on and has weapons of mass destruction. Before 1991, he was close to a nuclear device. Now, youâ€™ll get a debate about whether itâ€™s one year away or five years away.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Evan Bayh &gt; August 4, 2002<br />
â€œIâ€™m inclined to support going in there and dealing with Saddam, but I think that case<br />
needs to be made on a separate basis: his possession of biological and chemical weapons, his desire to get nuclear weapons, his proven track record of attacking his neighbors and others.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Russell Feingold &gt; October 9, 2002<br />
â€œWith regard to Iraq, I agree Iraq presents a genuine threat, especially in the form of weapons of mass destruction: chemical, biological and potentially nuclear weapons. I agree that Saddam Hussein is exceptionally dangerous and brutal, if not uniquely so, as the president argues.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Bill Clinton &gt; February 17, 1998<br />
â€œWe have to defend our future from these predators of the 21st Centuryâ€¦. They will be all the more lethal if we allow them to build arsenals of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them. We simply cannot allow that to happen. There is no more clear example of this threat than Saddam Hussein.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Johnny Edwards &gt; January 7, 2003<br />
â€œServing on the intelligence committee and seeing day after day, week after week, briefings on Saddamâ€™s weapons of mass destruction and his plans on using those weapons, he cannot be allowed to have nuclear weapons. Itâ€™s just that simple. The whole world changes if Saddam ever has nuclear weapons.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Hillary Clinton &gt; January 22, 2003<br />
â€œI voted for the Iraqi resolution. I consider the prospect of a nuclear-armed Saddam Hussein who can threaten not only his neighbors but the stability of the region and the world, a very serious threat to the United States.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
John Kerry &gt; January 31, 2003<br />
â€œIf you donâ€™t believeâ€¦Saddam Hussein<br />
is a threat with nuclear weapons, then<br />
you shouldnâ€™t vote for me.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Joe Biden &gt; August 4, 2002<br />
â€œWe know he continues to attempt to gain access to additional capability, including nuclear capability.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Bill Nelson &gt; September 14, 2002<br />
â€œI believe he has chemical and biological weapons. I think heâ€™s trying to develop nuclear weapons, and the fact that he might use those is a considerable threat to us.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Johnny Edwards &gt; February 6, 2003<br />
â€œThe question is whether weâ€™re going to allow this man whoâ€™s been developing weapons of mass destruction continue to develop weapons of mass destruction, get nuclear capability and get to the place where â€” if weâ€™re going to stop him if he invades a country around him â€” itâ€™ll cost millions of lives as opposed to thousands of lives.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Al Gore &gt; September 23, 2002<br />
â€œWe know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Joe Biden &gt; August 4, 2002<br />
â€œFirst of all, we donâ€™t know exactly what he has. Itâ€™s been five years since inspectors have been in there, number one. Number two, it is clear that he has residual of chemical weapons and biological weapons, number one.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Tom Daschle &gt; February 11, 1998<br />
â€œThe (Clinton) administration has said, â€˜Look, we have exhausted virtually our diplomatic effort to get the Iraqis to comply with their own agreements and with international law. Given that, what other option is there but to force them to do so?â€™ Thatâ€™s what theyâ€™re saying. This is the key question. And the answer is we donâ€™t have another option. We have got to force them to comply, and we are doing so militarily.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Senator Bob Graham &gt; December 8, 2002<br />
â€œWe are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has and has had for a number of years a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Bill Richardson &gt; May 29, 1998<br />
â€œThe threat of nuclear proliferation is one of the big challenges that we have now, especially by states that have nuclear weapons, outlaw states like Iraq.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
John Kerry &gt; February 23, 1998<br />
â€œSaddam Hussein has already used these weapons and has made it clear that he has the intent to continue to try, by virtue of his duplicity and secrecy, to continue to do so. That is a threat to the stability of the Middle East. It is a threat with respect to the potential of terrorist activities on a global basis. It is a threat even to regions near but not exactly in the Middle East.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Hillary Clinton &gt; October 10, 2002<br />
â€œIt is clear, however, that if left unchecked Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capability to wage biological and chemical warfare and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Al Gore &gt; December 16, 1998<br />
â€œ[I]f you allow someone like Saddam Hussein to get nuclear weapons, ballistic missiles, chemical weapons, biological weapons, how many people is he going to kill with such weapons? He has already demonstrated a willingness to use such weaponsâ€¦â€ </strong><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1434433', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. A. Cady</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/comment-page-3/#comment-1423780</link>
		<dc:creator>M. A. Cady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/#comment-1423780</guid>
		<description>I would like to compliment Progs on their consistency. There has not been a war the US has been engaged in the last 40 years that Progs wanted to win. In that time period, there has not been an enemy they did not want to â€œunderstandâ€, apologize to or appease.

Comment by mighty aphrodite â€” January 9, 2007 @ 12:51 pm

My reply:

&quot;There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of
our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason
is simply a racket.&quot;

        Major General Smedley Butler, USMC, 1933
        Two-time recipient of the Congressional Medal of Honor

Since 1945, the United States has intervened abroad 67 times, causing twelve million deaths, about half by overt action (Pentagon) and covert action (CIA).

Remember to the rest of the world WE are the terrorists!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to compliment Progs on their consistency. There has not been a war the US has been engaged in the last 40 years that Progs wanted to win. In that time period, there has not been an enemy they did not want to â€œunderstandâ€, apologize to or appease.</p>
<p>Comment by mighty aphrodite â€” January 9, 2007 @ 12:51 pm</p>
<p>My reply:</p>
<p>&#8220;There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of<br />
our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason<br />
is simply a racket.&#8221;</p>
<p>        Major General Smedley Butler, USMC, 1933<br />
        Two-time recipient of the Congressional Medal of Honor</p>
<p>Since 1945, the United States has intervened abroad 67 times, causing twelve million deaths, about half by overt action (Pentagon) and covert action (CIA).</p>
<p>Remember to the rest of the world WE are the terrorists!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1423780', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Freeh</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/comment-page-3/#comment-1423431</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Freeh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/#comment-1423431</guid>
		<description>Specifically &lt;strong&gt;Article 1&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Section 8&lt;/strong&gt; of our Constitution states in part:

The Congress shall have power to provide for the common defense;

&lt;strong&gt;To declare war&lt;/strong&gt;;

&lt;strong&gt;To raise and support armies&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;em&gt;but no appropriation of money to that use shall be for a longer term than two years;&lt;/em&gt;

To provide and maintain a navy;

To make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces.

Those are the relevant portions of that much revered and as of late much disrespected document known as the U.S. Constitution.

Congress must stand in the gap to protect and preserve what&#039;s left of the most glorious document ever penned. This marvelous experiment called Democracy must not fail.

U.S. senators and congressmen, consider your legacy: don&#039;t let history testify that democracy died on your watch. Don&#039;t let the record reflect that you were asleep at the switch when so much was at stake.Don&#039;t be cowardly.Be men and be women. Take courage and serve your citizenry and your God and your Country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Specifically <strong>Article 1</strong> <strong>Section 8</strong> of our Constitution states in part:</p>
<p>The Congress shall have power to provide for the common defense;</p>
<p><strong>To declare war</strong>;</p>
<p><strong>To raise and support armies</strong>, <em>but no appropriation of money to that use shall be for a longer term than two years;</em></p>
<p>To provide and maintain a navy;</p>
<p>To make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces.</p>
<p>Those are the relevant portions of that much revered and as of late much disrespected document known as the U.S. Constitution.</p>
<p>Congress must stand in the gap to protect and preserve what&#8217;s left of the most glorious document ever penned. This marvelous experiment called Democracy must not fail.</p>
<p>U.S. senators and congressmen, consider your legacy: don&#8217;t let history testify that democracy died on your watch. Don&#8217;t let the record reflect that you were asleep at the switch when so much was at stake.Don&#8217;t be cowardly.Be men and be women. Take courage and serve your citizenry and your God and your Country.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1423431', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul in LA</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/comment-page-3/#comment-1423150</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul in LA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/#comment-1423150</guid>
		<description>I see that joeslogic has posted that lying piece of FOX crap again. I&#039;ve debunked it so many times it&#039;s ridiculous.

90% of the quotes are from Desert Fox in 1998 -- the rest are taken entirely out of context with graphs that make it clear these statements were positive preambles TO DISAGREEING with the contention, as politicians are wont to do.

Garbage. Bushco LIED the country into war, and committed TREASON when they armed the insurgency with 300 tons of high-explosives. Put that in your pipe and smoke it, you fool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see that joeslogic has posted that lying piece of FOX crap again. I&#8217;ve debunked it so many times it&#8217;s ridiculous.</p>
<p>90% of the quotes are from Desert Fox in 1998 &#8212; the rest are taken entirely out of context with graphs that make it clear these statements were positive preambles TO DISAGREEING with the contention, as politicians are wont to do.</p>
<p>Garbage. Bushco LIED the country into war, and committed TREASON when they armed the insurgency with 300 tons of high-explosives. Put that in your pipe and smoke it, you fool.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1423150', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joeslogic</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/comment-page-3/#comment-1421907</link>
		<dc:creator>joeslogic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/#comment-1421907</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You still havenâ€™t responded  Comment by Thiassi &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I can recall only one real response to a question I have put on this forum. That was some guy who agreed that Kennedy was a piece of crap. But then went on to say that as a whole the Democrats were right. 

But I have had people try some sort of condescending approach implying that I would not be a man and answer a question. When I called him out on it.... nothing. 

Mighty Aphrodite I&#039;m sure has noticed that when you guys are not lying about events outside of this forum then you are lying about events that have occurred inside this forum. And hitting her with a million questions does not cut it. The rule should be. I&#039;m still waiting for &quot;X&quot;-person to answer my question before I take any. 

The pathetic attempt to gain up on MA is weak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You still havenâ€™t responded  Comment by Thiassi </p></blockquote>
<p>I can recall only one real response to a question I have put on this forum. That was some guy who agreed that Kennedy was a piece of crap. But then went on to say that as a whole the Democrats were right. </p>
<p>But I have had people try some sort of condescending approach implying that I would not be a man and answer a question. When I called him out on it&#8230;. nothing. </p>
<p>Mighty Aphrodite I&#8217;m sure has noticed that when you guys are not lying about events outside of this forum then you are lying about events that have occurred inside this forum. And hitting her with a million questions does not cut it. The rule should be. I&#8217;m still waiting for &#8220;X&#8221;-person to answer my question before I take any. </p>
<p>The pathetic attempt to gain up on MA is weak.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1421907', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solitaire</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/comment-page-3/#comment-1421881</link>
		<dc:creator>Solitaire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/#comment-1421881</guid>
		<description>Of course, the problem with ALL of the Dem comments quoted above is that that they were MISLED by the administration to believe that there was PROOF that Saddam had nuclear weapons.  Based on White House lies, decisions were made to patriotically support the administration, not knowing at the time that the &quot;proof&quot; was bullshit.  Now joeslogic pastes in the statements made by Dems while they were still in a state of belief?  You rub the lies into our wounds?  You think that this makes a point other than our President lied and duped even the Dems into believing him?  This is an argument you present?  This is simply more proof that the President has no problem lying to the people and to the Congress!  It&#039;s a cautionary tale indeed that nobody can trust this Administration for anything!  Certainly not justification for war.  Not even assurances that the people of the US are protected!  Lies are not protection!  And lying now about the escalation of the war, calling it a &quot;surge&quot;,  in spite of the people&#039;s mandate to get out,  will not save our troops or the prezidiot or the GOP.   IT&#039;s a dead party led by the president of dunces, and it&#039;s time they were ALL buried in the dungheap of history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, the problem with ALL of the Dem comments quoted above is that that they were MISLED by the administration to believe that there was PROOF that Saddam had nuclear weapons.  Based on White House lies, decisions were made to patriotically support the administration, not knowing at the time that the &#8220;proof&#8221; was bullshit.  Now joeslogic pastes in the statements made by Dems while they were still in a state of belief?  You rub the lies into our wounds?  You think that this makes a point other than our President lied and duped even the Dems into believing him?  This is an argument you present?  This is simply more proof that the President has no problem lying to the people and to the Congress!  It&#8217;s a cautionary tale indeed that nobody can trust this Administration for anything!  Certainly not justification for war.  Not even assurances that the people of the US are protected!  Lies are not protection!  And lying now about the escalation of the war, calling it a &#8220;surge&#8221;,  in spite of the people&#8217;s mandate to get out,  will not save our troops or the prezidiot or the GOP.   IT&#8217;s a dead party led by the president of dunces, and it&#8217;s time they were ALL buried in the dungheap of history.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1421881', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solitaire</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/comment-page-3/#comment-1421743</link>
		<dc:creator>Solitaire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/#comment-1421743</guid>
		<description>MA is the sorest loser I have ever heard.  It needs to slide down off it&#039;s pedestal and lick it&#039;s wounds.  Take a look around, horror show.  You&#039;re busted.  Your gang is busted.  The failures and lies are of historical proportions!  The GOP is a party of death and the dying.  Your personal little glory hole is plugged with the dung you left behind on this blog.  Nobody believes a word of it anymore, at least nobody who is not a troll like you.  Please accept my utmost contempt and a promise that any comment signed by you will be skipped by me for perpetuity.  Goodbye and good riddance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MA is the sorest loser I have ever heard.  It needs to slide down off it&#8217;s pedestal and lick it&#8217;s wounds.  Take a look around, horror show.  You&#8217;re busted.  Your gang is busted.  The failures and lies are of historical proportions!  The GOP is a party of death and the dying.  Your personal little glory hole is plugged with the dung you left behind on this blog.  Nobody believes a word of it anymore, at least nobody who is not a troll like you.  Please accept my utmost contempt and a promise that any comment signed by you will be skipped by me for perpetuity.  Goodbye and good riddance.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1421743', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smithers MINNEAPOLIS &#187; Bush vs. Congress vs. Petraeus vs. Iraq vs. America</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/comment-page-3/#comment-1421667</link>
		<dc:creator>Smithers MINNEAPOLIS &#187; Bush vs. Congress vs. Petraeus vs. Iraq vs. America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/#comment-1421667</guid>
		<description>[...] WATB&#8217;s like Sean Hannity and local talk radio dung heap Jason Lewis have been railing against Congress, stating that they are making an unconstitutional move if they attempt to stop the troop transfer. Think Progress details numerous examples since 1970 of Congress exercising that very kind of control over the Commander in Chief&#8217;s ability to increase the troops strength. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WATB&rsquo;s like Sean Hannity and local talk radio dung heap Jason Lewis have been railing against Congress, stating that they are making an unconstitutional move if they attempt to stop the troop transfer. Think Progress details numerous examples since 1970 of Congress exercising that very kind of control over the Commander in Chief&#8217;s ability to increase the troops strength. [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1421667', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mighty aphrodite</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/comment-page-3/#comment-1421649</link>
		<dc:creator>mighty aphrodite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/#comment-1421649</guid>
		<description>Thiass - I have responded to DemSold almost more than a person should have to....and with arguments so erudite that Sominex would be put out of business.  Apparently not much penetrates his skull....Could it be a steel plate?

This place is a playground of ideas...in case you hadn&#039;t noticed.   Want serious?  Go to PBS, C-SPAN, etc. 

And once again...you fail miserably</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thiass &#8211; I have responded to DemSold almost more than a person should have to&#8230;.and with arguments so erudite that Sominex would be put out of business.  Apparently not much penetrates his skull&#8230;.Could it be a steel plate?</p>
<p>This place is a playground of ideas&#8230;in case you hadn&#8217;t noticed.   Want serious?  Go to PBS, C-SPAN, etc. </p>
<p>And once again&#8230;you fail miserably<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1421649', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thiassi</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/comment-page-3/#comment-1421441</link>
		<dc:creator>Thiassi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/#comment-1421441</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Thiass - Because you agree with DemSoldier, his/her responses are â€œwell-informedâ€. Because I correctly note the apology/appeasement mentality of Progs and Progettesâ€¦you try to make a salient pointâ€¦.and fail miserablyâ€¦

Comment by mighty_aphrodite&lt;/em&gt;

You still haven&#039;t responded to any of his points, though, have you?

Persistently ignoring such well informed posts only highlights your own inability to hold an argument and defend your own views in a mature manner. 

There are plenty of conservatives who can argue properly and who do not need to resort to immature name calling - as you continuously do here. 

Can you do no more than simply go around name calling or do you still feel that this child&#039;s &quot;playground&quot; mentality of yours can win arguments that you are so pitiful at holding?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Thiass &#8211; Because you agree with DemSoldier, his/her responses are â€œwell-informedâ€. Because I correctly note the apology/appeasement mentality of Progs and Progettesâ€¦you try to make a salient pointâ€¦.and fail miserablyâ€¦</p>
<p>Comment by mighty_aphrodite</em></p>
<p>You still haven&#8217;t responded to any of his points, though, have you?</p>
<p>Persistently ignoring such well informed posts only highlights your own inability to hold an argument and defend your own views in a mature manner. </p>
<p>There are plenty of conservatives who can argue properly and who do not need to resort to immature name calling &#8211; as you continuously do here. </p>
<p>Can you do no more than simply go around name calling or do you still feel that this child&#8217;s &#8220;playground&#8221; mentality of yours can win arguments that you are so pitiful at holding?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1421441', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barfly</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/comment-page-3/#comment-1419360</link>
		<dc:creator>Barfly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/#comment-1419360</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Put the troops out there the pull the rug right out from under them great guys. &lt;/em&gt;

Joe&#039;s regurgitated crap.

Yeah, after almost four years of steadily-increasing troop deaths, squandered tax money, and cultish cowards crowing every time we capture another &quot;al-qaeda&#039;s number-two man,&quot; Dems pulled the rug &lt;em&gt;right out&lt;/em&gt; from under the troops.

Posting those quotes shows the feebleness of your argument; Saddam was boxed in, and the UN weapons inspectors were effectively doing their jobs.  There was no reason to invade, as Saddam wasn&#039;t aiding terrorists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Put the troops out there the pull the rug right out from under them great guys. </em></p>
<p>Joe&#8217;s regurgitated crap.</p>
<p>Yeah, after almost four years of steadily-increasing troop deaths, squandered tax money, and cultish cowards crowing every time we capture another &#8220;al-qaeda&#8217;s number-two man,&#8221; Dems pulled the rug <em>right out</em> from under the troops.</p>
<p>Posting those quotes shows the feebleness of your argument; Saddam was boxed in, and the UN weapons inspectors were effectively doing their jobs.  There was no reason to invade, as Saddam wasn&#8217;t aiding terrorists.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1419360', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joeslogic</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/comment-page-3/#comment-1419107</link>
		<dc:creator>joeslogic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/#comment-1419107</guid>
		<description>Put the troops out there the pull the rug right out from under them great guys. 

1.	Quote:
October 9th, 1999 Letter to President Clinton Signed by Senators Levin, Lieberman, Lautenberg, Dodd, Kerrey, Feinstein, Mikulski, Daschle, Breaux, Johnson, Inouye, Landrieu, Ford and Kerry â€” all Democrats 
â€œWe urge you, after consulting with Congress and consistent with the US Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions, including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraqâ€™s refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs.â€ 
Quote:
Joe Biden &gt; August 4, 2002
â€œThis is a guy who is an extreme danger to the world, and this is a guy who is in every way possible seeking weapons of mass destruction.â€ 
Quote:
Bill Clinton &gt; February 17, 1998 
â€œIf Saddam rejects peace, and we have to use force, our purpose is clear: We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraqâ€™s weapons of mass destruction program.â€ 
Quote: 
Chuck Schumer &gt; October 10, 2002
â€œIt is Husseinâ€™s vigorous pursuit of biological, chemical and nuclear weapons, and his present and future potential support for terrorist acts and organizations that make him a danger to the people of the united states.â€ 
Quote:
Madeleine Albright &gt; February 1, 1998 
â€œWe must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and the security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction.â€ 
Quote:
Nancy Pelosi &gt; December 16, 1998 
â€œSaddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology, which is a threat to countries in the region, and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.â€ 
Quote:
John Kerry &gt; January 23, 2003
â€œWithout question we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator leading an impressive regime. He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. And now heâ€™s miscalculating Americaâ€™s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. His consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction.â€ 
Quote:
Al Gore &gt; September 23, 2002 
â€œWe know that he has stored nuclear supplies, secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.â€ 
Quote:
Sandy Berger &gt; February 18, 1998 
â€œHeâ€™ll use those weapons of mass destruction again as he has 10 times since 1983.â€ 
Quote:
John Kerry &gt; October 9, 2002 
â€œI will be voting to give the president of the US the authority to use force if necessary to disarm Saddam because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security.â€ 
Quote:
Senator Carl Levin &gt; September 19, 2002 
â€œWe begin with a common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations, is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them.â€ 
Quote:
Ted Kennedy &gt; September 27, 2002 
â€œWe have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.â€ 
Quote:
Senator Hillary Clinton &gt; October 10, 2002 
â€œIn the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock. His missile delivery capability, his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists including Al-Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.â€ 
Quote:
Jay Rockefeller &gt; October 10, 2002 
â€œThere was unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years. We also should remember that we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction.â€ 
Quote:
Madeleine Albright &gt; November 10, 1999 
â€œHussein has chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies.â€ 
Quote:
Joe Biden &gt; August 4, 2002 
â€œ[H]e does have the capacity, as all terrorist-related operations do, of smuggling stuff into the United States and doing something terrible. That is true. But thereâ€™s been no connection, hard connection made yet between he and al-Qaida or his willingness or effort to do that thus far. Doesnâ€™t mean he wonâ€™t. This is a bad guy.â€ 
Quote:
Robert Byrd &gt; October 3, 2002 
â€œThe last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of â€˜98. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons.â€ 
Quote:
Madeline Albright &gt; February 18, 2002
Iraq is a long way from (here), but what happens there matters a great deal here, for the risk that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest national security threat we face â€” and it is a threat against which we must and will stand firm.â€ 
Quote:
Al Gore &gt; September 23, 2002 
â€œIraqâ€™s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter, and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.â€ 
Quote:
Jane Harman &gt; August 27, 2002
â€œI certainly think (Husseinâ€™s) developing nuclear capability which, fortunately, the Israelis set back 20 years ago with their preemptive attack which, in hindsight, looks pretty darn good.â€ 
Quote:
Joe Biden &gt; August 4, 2002
â€œI think he has anthrax. I have not seen any evidence that he has smallpox, but you hear them say, Tim (Russert), is the last smallpox outbreak in the world was in Iraq; ergo, he may have a strain.â€ 
Quote:
Dick Durbin &gt; September 30, 1999
â€œOne of the most compelling threats we in this country face today is the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Threat assessments regularly warn us of the possibility that North Korea, Iran, Iraq, or some other nation may acquire or develop nuclear weapons.â€ 
Quote:
Bill Clinton &gt; December 17, 1998
â€œEarlier today, I ordered Americaâ€™s armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraqâ€¦. Their mission is to attack Iraqâ€™s nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.â€ 
Quote:
Bill Nelson &gt; August 25, 2002
â€œ[M]y own personal view is, I think Saddam
has chemical and biological weapons,
and I expect that he is trying to develop
a nuclear weapon. So at some point,
we might have to act precipitously.â€ 
Quote:
Hillary Clinton &gt; October 10, 2002
â€œIn the four years since the inspections, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability and his nuclear program.â€ 
Quote:
Nancy Pelosi &gt; October 10, 2002
â€œYes, he has chemical weapons. Yes, he has biological weapons. He is trying to get nuclear weapons.â€ 
Quote:
Dick Gephardt &gt; September 23, 2002
â€œ(I have seen) a large body of intelligence information over a long time that he is working on and has weapons of mass destruction. Before 1991, he was close to a nuclear device. Now, youâ€™ll get a debate about whether itâ€™s one year away or five years away.â€ 
Quote:
Evan Bayh &gt; August 4, 2002
â€œIâ€™m inclined to support going in there and dealing with Saddam, but I think that case
needs to be made on a separate basis: his possession of biological and chemical weapons, his desire to get nuclear weapons, his proven track record of attacking his neighbors and others.â€ 
Quote:
Russell Feingold &gt; October 9, 2002
â€œWith regard to Iraq, I agree Iraq presents a genuine threat, especially in the form of weapons of mass destruction: chemical, biological and potentially nuclear weapons. I agree that Saddam Hussein is exceptionally dangerous and brutal, if not uniquely so, as the president argues.â€ 
Quote:
Bill Clinton &gt; February 17, 1998
â€œWe have to defend our future from these predators of the 21st Centuryâ€¦. They will be all the more lethal if we allow them to build arsenals of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them. We simply cannot allow that to happen. There is no more clear example of this threat than Saddam Hussein.â€ 
Quote:
Johnny Edwards &gt; January 7, 2003
â€œServing on the intelligence committee and seeing day after day, week after week, briefings on Saddamâ€™s weapons of mass destruction and his plans on using those weapons, he cannot be allowed to have nuclear weapons. Itâ€™s just that simple. The whole world changes if Saddam ever has nuclear weapons.â€ 
Quote:
Hillary Clinton &gt; January 22, 2003
â€œI voted for the Iraqi resolution. I consider the prospect of a nuclear-armed Saddam Hussein who can threaten not only his neighbors but the stability of the region and the world, a very serious threat to the United States.â€ 
Quote:
John Kerry &gt; January 31, 2003
â€œIf you donâ€™t believeâ€¦Saddam Hussein
is a threat with nuclear weapons, then
you shouldnâ€™t vote for me.â€ 
Quote: 
Joe Biden &gt; August 4, 2002
â€œWe know he continues to attempt to gain access to additional capability, including nuclear capability.â€ 
Quote:
Bill Nelson &gt; September 14, 2002
â€œI believe he has chemical and biological weapons. I think heâ€™s trying to develop nuclear weapons, and the fact that he might use those is a considerable threat to us.â€ 
Quote:
Johnny Edwards &gt; February 6, 2003
â€œThe question is whether weâ€™re going to allow this man whoâ€™s been developing weapons of mass destruction continue to develop weapons of mass destruction, get nuclear capability and get to the place where â€” if weâ€™re going to stop him if he invades a country around him â€” itâ€™ll cost millions of lives as opposed to thousands of lives.â€ 
Quote:
Al Gore &gt; September 23, 2002
â€œWe know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.â€ 
Quote:
Joe Biden &gt; August 4, 2002
â€œFirst of all, we donâ€™t know exactly what he has. Itâ€™s been five years since inspectors have been in there, number one. Number two, it is clear that he has residual of chemical weapons and biological weapons, number one.â€ 
Quote:
Tom Daschle &gt; February 11, 1998
â€œThe (Clinton) administration has said, â€˜Look, we have exhausted virtually our diplomatic effort to get the Iraqis to comply with their own agreements and with international law. Given that, what other option is there but to force them to do so?â€™ Thatâ€™s what theyâ€™re saying. This is the key question. And the answer is we donâ€™t have another option. We have got to force them to comply, and we are doing so militarily.â€ 
Quote:
Senator Bob Graham &gt; December 8, 2002 
â€œWe are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has and has had for a number of years a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.â€ 
Quote:
Bill Richardson &gt; May 29, 1998
â€œThe threat of nuclear proliferation is one of the big challenges that we have now, especially by states that have nuclear weapons, outlaw states like Iraq.â€ 
Quote:
John Kerry &gt; February 23, 1998
â€œSaddam Hussein has already used these weapons and has made it clear that he has the intent to continue to try, by virtue of his duplicity and secrecy, to continue to do so. That is a threat to the stability of the Middle East. It is a threat with respect to the potential of terrorist activities on a global basis. It is a threat even to regions near but not exactly in the Middle East.â€ 
Quote:
Hillary Clinton &gt; October 10, 2002
â€œIt is clear, however, that if left unchecked Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capability to wage biological and chemical warfare and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.â€ 
Quote:
Al Gore &gt; December 16, 1998
â€œ[I]f you allow someone like Saddam Hussein to get nuclear weapons, ballistic missiles, chemical weapons, biological weapons, how many people is he going to kill with such weapons? He has already demonstrated a willingness to use such weaponsâ€¦â€</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Put the troops out there the pull the rug right out from under them great guys. </p>
<p>1.	Quote:<br />
October 9th, 1999 Letter to President Clinton Signed by Senators Levin, Lieberman, Lautenberg, Dodd, Kerrey, Feinstein, Mikulski, Daschle, Breaux, Johnson, Inouye, Landrieu, Ford and Kerry â€” all Democrats<br />
â€œWe urge you, after consulting with Congress and consistent with the US Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions, including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraqâ€™s refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Joe Biden &gt; August 4, 2002<br />
â€œThis is a guy who is an extreme danger to the world, and this is a guy who is in every way possible seeking weapons of mass destruction.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Bill Clinton &gt; February 17, 1998<br />
â€œIf Saddam rejects peace, and we have to use force, our purpose is clear: We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraqâ€™s weapons of mass destruction program.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Chuck Schumer &gt; October 10, 2002<br />
â€œIt is Husseinâ€™s vigorous pursuit of biological, chemical and nuclear weapons, and his present and future potential support for terrorist acts and organizations that make him a danger to the people of the united states.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Madeleine Albright &gt; February 1, 1998<br />
â€œWe must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and the security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Nancy Pelosi &gt; December 16, 1998<br />
â€œSaddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology, which is a threat to countries in the region, and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
John Kerry &gt; January 23, 2003<br />
â€œWithout question we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator leading an impressive regime. He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. And now heâ€™s miscalculating Americaâ€™s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. His consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Al Gore &gt; September 23, 2002<br />
â€œWe know that he has stored nuclear supplies, secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Sandy Berger &gt; February 18, 1998<br />
â€œHeâ€™ll use those weapons of mass destruction again as he has 10 times since 1983.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
John Kerry &gt; October 9, 2002<br />
â€œI will be voting to give the president of the US the authority to use force if necessary to disarm Saddam because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Senator Carl Levin &gt; September 19, 2002<br />
â€œWe begin with a common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations, is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Ted Kennedy &gt; September 27, 2002<br />
â€œWe have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Senator Hillary Clinton &gt; October 10, 2002<br />
â€œIn the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock. His missile delivery capability, his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists including Al-Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Jay Rockefeller &gt; October 10, 2002<br />
â€œThere was unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years. We also should remember that we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Madeleine Albright &gt; November 10, 1999<br />
â€œHussein has chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Joe Biden &gt; August 4, 2002<br />
â€œ[H]e does have the capacity, as all terrorist-related operations do, of smuggling stuff into the United States and doing something terrible. That is true. But thereâ€™s been no connection, hard connection made yet between he and al-Qaida or his willingness or effort to do that thus far. Doesnâ€™t mean he wonâ€™t. This is a bad guy.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Robert Byrd &gt; October 3, 2002<br />
â€œThe last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of â€˜98. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Madeline Albright &gt; February 18, 2002<br />
Iraq is a long way from (here), but what happens there matters a great deal here, for the risk that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest national security threat we face â€” and it is a threat against which we must and will stand firm.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Al Gore &gt; September 23, 2002<br />
â€œIraqâ€™s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter, and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Jane Harman &gt; August 27, 2002<br />
â€œI certainly think (Husseinâ€™s) developing nuclear capability which, fortunately, the Israelis set back 20 years ago with their preemptive attack which, in hindsight, looks pretty darn good.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Joe Biden &gt; August 4, 2002<br />
â€œI think he has anthrax. I have not seen any evidence that he has smallpox, but you hear them say, Tim (Russert), is the last smallpox outbreak in the world was in Iraq; ergo, he may have a strain.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Dick Durbin &gt; September 30, 1999<br />
â€œOne of the most compelling threats we in this country face today is the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Threat assessments regularly warn us of the possibility that North Korea, Iran, Iraq, or some other nation may acquire or develop nuclear weapons.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Bill Clinton &gt; December 17, 1998<br />
â€œEarlier today, I ordered Americaâ€™s armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraqâ€¦. Their mission is to attack Iraqâ€™s nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Bill Nelson &gt; August 25, 2002<br />
â€œ[M]y own personal view is, I think Saddam<br />
has chemical and biological weapons,<br />
and I expect that he is trying to develop<br />
a nuclear weapon. So at some point,<br />
we might have to act precipitously.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Hillary Clinton &gt; October 10, 2002<br />
â€œIn the four years since the inspections, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability and his nuclear program.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Nancy Pelosi &gt; October 10, 2002<br />
â€œYes, he has chemical weapons. Yes, he has biological weapons. He is trying to get nuclear weapons.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Dick Gephardt &gt; September 23, 2002<br />
â€œ(I have seen) a large body of intelligence information over a long time that he is working on and has weapons of mass destruction. Before 1991, he was close to a nuclear device. Now, youâ€™ll get a debate about whether itâ€™s one year away or five years away.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Evan Bayh &gt; August 4, 2002<br />
â€œIâ€™m inclined to support going in there and dealing with Saddam, but I think that case<br />
needs to be made on a separate basis: his possession of biological and chemical weapons, his desire to get nuclear weapons, his proven track record of attacking his neighbors and others.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Russell Feingold &gt; October 9, 2002<br />
â€œWith regard to Iraq, I agree Iraq presents a genuine threat, especially in the form of weapons of mass destruction: chemical, biological and potentially nuclear weapons. I agree that Saddam Hussein is exceptionally dangerous and brutal, if not uniquely so, as the president argues.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Bill Clinton &gt; February 17, 1998<br />
â€œWe have to defend our future from these predators of the 21st Centuryâ€¦. They will be all the more lethal if we allow them to build arsenals of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them. We simply cannot allow that to happen. There is no more clear example of this threat than Saddam Hussein.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Johnny Edwards &gt; January 7, 2003<br />
â€œServing on the intelligence committee and seeing day after day, week after week, briefings on Saddamâ€™s weapons of mass destruction and his plans on using those weapons, he cannot be allowed to have nuclear weapons. Itâ€™s just that simple. The whole world changes if Saddam ever has nuclear weapons.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Hillary Clinton &gt; January 22, 2003<br />
â€œI voted for the Iraqi resolution. I consider the prospect of a nuclear-armed Saddam Hussein who can threaten not only his neighbors but the stability of the region and the world, a very serious threat to the United States.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
John Kerry &gt; January 31, 2003<br />
â€œIf you donâ€™t believeâ€¦Saddam Hussein<br />
is a threat with nuclear weapons, then<br />
you shouldnâ€™t vote for me.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Joe Biden &gt; August 4, 2002<br />
â€œWe know he continues to attempt to gain access to additional capability, including nuclear capability.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Bill Nelson &gt; September 14, 2002<br />
â€œI believe he has chemical and biological weapons. I think heâ€™s trying to develop nuclear weapons, and the fact that he might use those is a considerable threat to us.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Johnny Edwards &gt; February 6, 2003<br />
â€œThe question is whether weâ€™re going to allow this man whoâ€™s been developing weapons of mass destruction continue to develop weapons of mass destruction, get nuclear capability and get to the place where â€” if weâ€™re going to stop him if he invades a country around him â€” itâ€™ll cost millions of lives as opposed to thousands of lives.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Al Gore &gt; September 23, 2002<br />
â€œWe know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Joe Biden &gt; August 4, 2002<br />
â€œFirst of all, we donâ€™t know exactly what he has. Itâ€™s been five years since inspectors have been in there, number one. Number two, it is clear that he has residual of chemical weapons and biological weapons, number one.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Tom Daschle &gt; February 11, 1998<br />
â€œThe (Clinton) administration has said, â€˜Look, we have exhausted virtually our diplomatic effort to get the Iraqis to comply with their own agreements and with international law. Given that, what other option is there but to force them to do so?â€™ Thatâ€™s what theyâ€™re saying. This is the key question. And the answer is we donâ€™t have another option. We have got to force them to comply, and we are doing so militarily.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Senator Bob Graham &gt; December 8, 2002<br />
â€œWe are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has and has had for a number of years a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Bill Richardson &gt; May 29, 1998<br />
â€œThe threat of nuclear proliferation is one of the big challenges that we have now, especially by states that have nuclear weapons, outlaw states like Iraq.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
John Kerry &gt; February 23, 1998<br />
â€œSaddam Hussein has already used these weapons and has made it clear that he has the intent to continue to try, by virtue of his duplicity and secrecy, to continue to do so. That is a threat to the stability of the Middle East. It is a threat with respect to the potential of terrorist activities on a global basis. It is a threat even to regions near but not exactly in the Middle East.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Hillary Clinton &gt; October 10, 2002<br />
â€œIt is clear, however, that if left unchecked Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capability to wage biological and chemical warfare and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.â€<br />
Quote:<br />
Al Gore &gt; December 16, 1998<br />
â€œ[I]f you allow someone like Saddam Hussein to get nuclear weapons, ballistic missiles, chemical weapons, biological weapons, how many people is he going to kill with such weapons? He has already demonstrated a willingness to use such weaponsâ€¦â€<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1419107', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mighty aphrodite</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/comment-page-3/#comment-1418971</link>
		<dc:creator>mighty aphrodite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/09/deployment-funding-limits-congress/#comment-1418971</guid>
		<description>I thought you  East Coast BlueStaters loved gays and celebrated their diverse biological discoveries......don&#039;t worry, your mom loves you anyway!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought you  East Coast BlueStaters loved gays and celebrated their diverse biological discoveries&#8230;&#8230;don&#8217;t worry, your mom loves you anyway!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1418971', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
