Comments on: Fox Anchor: ‘Internet Blogs’ Say I Called Kennedy A ‘Hostile Enemy,’ But ‘I Didn’t Mean It That Way’

By: The Colonel

The Colonel — Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:01:07 +0000

I want Gretchen to have my child. She’s cute.

By: Crusty the Clown

Crusty the Clown — Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:58:34 +0000

Those Saturday mornings on CBS doing “Chef on a Shoestring” have given Gretchen the needed information and background to make political statements on Fox.

Her understanding of anything politcal, makes Geraldo look like William F. Buckley.

By: m

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:18:12 +0000

well she just might be right.Ted is an enemy of state, I can see him tacking that Amenesty Guest Worker Plan to any resolution or funding bill for this illegal war.They must have some good dirt on that buffoon cause he has never put forward an idea that doesnt screw this country.Jokes asside lets see if he can do it and end this catastrophy before Bush upsets any other countries to react.

By: ktpinnacle

ktpinnacle — Fri, 12 Jan 2007 06:29:51 +0000

Those mean internet bloggers sure were useful when Fox and the rest of the echo chamber wanted to sink Dan Rather . . . . Now they’re the enemy.

What will they think tomorrow?

By: Maharba Nolnnil

Maharba Nolnnil — Fri, 12 Jan 2007 05:55:35 +0000

Fauxy News.

For foxy fauxy, fauxy foxy people like you and me.

Go Fauxy!

Go, go Fauxy!

By: Ted Burke

Ted Burke — Fri, 12 Jan 2007 05:18:38 +0000

This woman is an idiot. No, wait, that’s being unfair to idiots. She is a moron. No, wait…

By: ForTruth

ForTruth — Fri, 12 Jan 2007 04:48:41 +0000

That looked like she was a little pained when she had to say that.

By: TSop

TSop — Fri, 12 Jan 2007 04:04:52 +0000

This broad replaced E.D. Tarbox on Faux and Friends? She must lick Roger Ailes pimply ass better….

By: TerrytheTurtle

TerrytheTurtle — Fri, 12 Jan 2007 03:19:00 +0000

Three words, Robert and Bluedog:

“Downing street memo”

By: VFW

VFW — Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:22:08 +0000

YEAH RIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT!!!!!!!!!!

By: Bluedog49

Bluedog49 — Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:43:56 +0000

Robert, every time someone says Bush lied to start a war, one of his supporters says, “no, he was given bad intelligence.” Rather was given documents which he thought were authentic (we still don’t really know whether or not they were) and presented them to the public. Rather simply felt that these documents supported what he and most people already knew about Bush. By the way, this is the exact same way that the author of “Fortunate Son” found himself being discredited and Karl Rove was involved with that incident as well.

By: robert

robert — Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:30:36 +0000

Bluedog49,

I am not saying that it exonerated Bush. All I am saying is that Rather went on the air, stating that the Documents he had in his possession had been authenticated. Later, it was found out that they had not been. Is that a lie or not?

If it was a lie then Rather should not have gotten a pass.

By: Uncle_Ho

Uncle_Ho — Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:20:55 +0000

BUSTED!!!

By: Bluedog49

Bluedog49 — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:52:09 +0000

How about Roger Ailes? Teddy looks downright fit next to that fatso. And, the last time I saw Rush he looked like he had added about 50 pounds — a big, fat, ugly slob. I loved how they digged at Nancy Pelosi’s looks — listen getting Nancy instead of that troll Hastert is a big upgrade. Pelosi is a very nice looking woman.

By: JoeWo Joe Wosik Blog » Blog Archive » FOX talking head returns to her vomit and sucks it back in

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:11:02 +0000

[...] She said Kennedy was an enemy of the state, then the White House tlaking head basically distanced himself from her statement.Â What is so hard to understand in this formula?Â Â However “some say” this cozying up to Ted Kennedy only displays this Fox talking head’s true extremely leftist stance on politics and her disdain for the Beloved Leader.Â I believe this FOX talking head should be brought back to the “Education Center” for some hard labor and intensive propoganda drilling.Â Â Story is here with both videos linked at the story [...]

By: Lora

Lora — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:50:40 +0000

Ahh, liberal press has nothing to say making fun of looks. Well, what does Pelosi look like? Or Hillary and her (puke) b!tch kid? You donâ€™t argue facts both ways do you want to make fun of looks both ways?
How about Ted? He is so bloated it looks like has has been under water looking for his date – ROTFL

Comment by Happy Guy

I have seen considerable posts here by trolls making fun of the looks of liberal women, such as Cindy Sheehan, Maureen Dowd, Nancy Pelosi, Hillary, and Helen Thomas (who is 87 years old, for Heaven’s sake). Aside from the fact that I personally find some of these women attractive, if you neo-cons really want to smash female looks, how about your own “beauties” like Bay Buchanan, Mary Matalin, and Katherine Harris?
Yes, Ted Kennedy is fat, but I doubt if he is any fatter than Dennis Hastert or Bill Bennett.

By: ForTruth

ForTruth — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:49:08 +0000

Peace Paul,

Sorry for the insults.

By: Bluestocking

Bluestocking — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:44:24 +0000

Ms. Carlson clearly needs to learn and put into practice the age-old advice of thinking before you speak and never saying anything you wouldn’t want splashed on the front page of the newspaper tomorrow. She chose of her own free will to shoot herself in the foot while it was still in her mouth — if she doesn’t like the consequences, then perhaps she should learn to choose her words with a little more care and a little more tact in future!

Personally, I’m one of those people who believes that people never say out loud anything they don’t truly mean on some level — probably due to the fact that most of the required reading for my psychology degree related to Freudian theory. So when Carlson called Ted Kennedy a hostile enemy of the United States on the home front, she didn’t really mean it? Sure…..riiiiiiiiiiiight. Pray tell, just what did she mean then? I don’t believe this halfhearted retraction of hers for one minute — I believe that deep down, even though she can’t really afford to acknowledge it completely on the record and even if she might have difficulty acknowledging it to herself in private, I very much believe that she considers Senator Kennedy and anyone else who disagrees with or questions the President to be an enemy of the United States.

When will these people realize that the country and the office of the Presidency are not one and the same — that one can love one’s country and still not love the President? These people are like the co-dependent family members of an active addict. There are times when the greater act of love is to say to someone “this behavior of yours really needs to stop because it’s hurting you and hurting us as well” rather than to constantly make excuses for someone’s behavior and pretend that there isn’t really a problem.

By: Bluedog49

Bluedog49 — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:28:39 +0000

Robert, you still don’t have any information on where Bush was for 3 to 9 months while he was supposed to be on Alabama National Guard Duty. You still don’t know why Bush refused to take a physical and was stripped of his flying priviledges. Nobody has ever come forward with any evidence that Bush was fulfilling his duties. I’m not sure what you think happened with the Dan Rather affair, but Bush was certainly not exonerated in any way, shape or form. The evidence shows that he didn’t show up for at least 3 months. Military proceedure at the time called someone in that catagory Absent Without Leave.

By: Bluedog49

Bluedog49 — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:25:02 +0000

GroopiesforGretchen: “She never called Kennedy an enemy of the state so your point is mute!”

The point may be unable to speak, but I still get it.