Hey “rachel b”, “rachel b blair”, “careful now”, “porcupiny” how many names do you use? Who pays you to disrupt this site? You say that Zooey and others are in some way complicit at hacking this site and some how redirect post somewhere else? If you have proof how did they do it? DNS injection? ARP poisoning? Man-in-the-middle attack? Zero day exploit? Explain to all of us how this supposedly was perpetrated. This is the third thread I have seen you use a different name to try and make zooey and others look bad regarding this. The reason I know its you, because of your syntax. Robert was probably you as well. I seen the comment he made and it doesn’t flow in sentence form, instead it’s choppy line by line.

Anyway, I’m in contact with parent company of TP, because I take allegations of IP hijacking very seriously. We will get to the bottom of this and I hope it’s a hoax, but won’t know until it’s investigated.

Even if your using an anonymous server or proxy to hide your IP that’s only good for the first time, because a pattern can be done to match the logs of this server to the down stream routers….

The democrats vs. republicans argument is used by the elites to keep you distracted from what they’re doing.

But they just keep on arguing….

For the record, read any one of the Bibles (last count there were 32 versions in print) – it tells Christians to kill non-believers. And if you don’t realize how Bush’s war on Iraq is exactly that, then you are blinded by your own blind faith.

Feel better?

We are at war with people that want us all dead. As a conservative, I hope that the democrats win in 2 years. That way the whole country will be onboard with the war on terror, not just the correct half.

First of all, I have a job and a life. I don’t live here. I come often, but do have other things to do. Therefore expecting me to read and responde to every post immediately is irrational.

Secondly, accusing people of crap that isn’t true is slander. Proof? One of the people with whom you accuse me of conspiring is not someone I like or who likes me. In fact we can’t stand one another. Much less conspire.

Thirdly, behaving this way won’t gain you friends. In fact, you’re assuring that people will snub you and not read your posts. The way to get friendship is by giving friendship. You’re on the wrong trail.

And lastly, please find a good therapist. For your own sake.

‘I don’t know’ isn’t an omission. An omission would be it not being there.

Stop spinning Exley.

It is a site that has an agenda and then attempts to fit the facts to support a conclusion it has already made.

No. They said “Here’s our list – but don’t just believe us – find your own evidence.” People with integrity don’t say that.

This is evidenced by the fact that in discussing the Korean War it purposely omits information about the communist North Korean invasion of South Korea in 1950 and the fact that the military action on the Korean peninsula in 1950-53 was a United Nations operation.

It was omitted. You are either being intentionally dense here to annoy me, or you are not getting the fact that it is YOU who is in serious denial and trying desperately to rationalize your criticism of Juan with a lot of inconsequential nonsense when you obviously don’t have facts to refute him with…

Indeed, the Korean War example goes to root of the flaw in the Web site Unbelievable passed along. It provides no historical context.

Sadly, it makes the benefit of the doubt that you and others learned that part in high school World History…

It makes no reference to the larger global conflict that was taking place between 1945 and 1990; namely, the Cold War between the United States and the West and the communnist bloc led by the USSR.

Again, it can’t give you the entire history of the world. It left it up to you to become educated first. Tall order, I see…

The vast majority of the military actions listed on the site are directly related to the Cold War, such as U.S. aid to Greece anti-communists after World War II during the Greek Civil War, the aid to the Nicaraguan freedom fighters that ultimately defeat the communist Sandinista dictatorship, aid to the democratically elected government of Jose Napoleon Duarte in El Salvador to defeat the communist insurrection, etc.

Exley, this still has NOTHING to do with you PROVING your claims.

As we know, as a result of the U.S.’s actions against the communist bloc and the Soviet Union in those and other theaters ultimately led to communism’s defeat and freedom for millions of people who lived under communist oppression for since the early 20th century.

Exley – this is your OPINION. I haven’t seen you post one single FACT to defend your cliam that the US military actions have all been for National Defense.

Prove we were threatened by the Phillipines, Laos, Nicaragua, Iraq, etc. PROVE IT.

So, yes, Unbelievable, the vast majority, if not all of the post-World War II military actions were justified and, thankfully, ultimately successful. And the result was the defeat of communism, the most murderous, oppressive ideology in world history and subsequent freedom for millions of people.
Comment by Exley — January 16, 2007 @ 10:06 pm

“Give me PROOF” isn’t a ‘yes or no’ question…

Any chance you’ll get that?

Me thinks “Think Progress” is not for “critical thinking” when the subject is 9-11, judging by my disappearing post!

Yup…TP has forbidden any discussion of the events of 9/11, on the grounds that such discussions tend to ‘hijack threads’.

It’s difficult enough discussing the general state of this country and the world without discussing 9/11…as I’ve said before numerous times, it’s like trying to discuss the fate of the Titanic without mentioning icebergs. But when you have a topic that involves 9/11, then trying to tiptoe around the issue becomes just plain ludicrous.

Nevertheless, TP continues to ‘disappear’ any posts that reference 9/11 Truth (especially posts with links to corroborating evidence), while allowing posts that cleave to the Official Version of Events and attack and ridicule 9/11 Truth to stand unchallenged.

It’s selective, unbalanced censorship, and it’s intellectually and morally dishonest. If TP was concerned about 9/11 posts hijacking the thread, they’d deal with all posts on the topic in the same manner. But that’s not what they’re concerned about.

So what are they concerned about? Try to submit posts regarding Zionism or AIPAC, and you’ll see them disappear just as quickly as 9/11 Truth posts. What does that tell you?

Whoa, michael, as a european I most strongly protest the idea of “our collective values”.
Man, I’m so glad I don’t live in the same country you live in, being brainwashed and stuff.

We should ask them where Osama is……….

Great idea! If we would just let a Christian Taliban rule our culture and government, we’d be safe! Three cheers for liberty!

Why didn’t anyone think of this before?! What a genius.

Now go get a tissue and wipe the sarcasm off your screen.

This is the pussiest crap I’ve ever heard coming from these people:

Though many Muslims believe their fight is against “America” and the West, they are really fighting the secular left.

Yeah, the ’secular left’ were the ones dropping bombs on them.

Muslim extremists may never be convinced of that distinction, but D’Souza argues the majority of traditional, nonradical Muslims can be.

This is the equivalent of ‘It’s not me you want to kill. It was that leftie. He went thattaway.’

What PUSSIES.

Yes, some debauchery exists in every culture, he says, but many see us proudly parade our perversions and then try to aggressively export them worldwide. Most are repulsed.

And so it’s right when they lob off heads for alleged adultery. It’s great when they kill you for shaving your beard.

So far some in America’s cultural left have gone into pre-emptive apoplectic rage based solely on the publisher’s introduction letter.

And these people are?

Frankly, this is so laughable that I’ve gone into pre-emptive jaw dropping.

This book is quite ignorable.

Please ignore it from now on Think Progress.
It’s too stupid to deserve publicity.

And this ONE Bush meeting occurred during a time (in the summer of 2001 just before the 9/11 attacks) when strident alarm bells were going off in the U.S. counter-terrorism intelligence community about an impending al Qaeda terrorist attack that Osama bin Laden was “determined” to conduct inside the United States.

And D’Sousa’s claim that the liberal freedoms in our liberal culture in our liberal democracy are responsible for the al Qaeda attacks indicates that he is just a traitor to our democracy, and should be locked away for a long, long time in a cell beside Bush, Cheney, Falwell, Robertson, Dobson, and all the other neo-con-poops who hate our liberal democracy as much as Osama bin Laden does.

The terrorist attacks of 9/11/2001 were an attack by Al Qaeda on ALL Americans, left and right.

Al-Qaeda? Al-Qaeda means the “Base”. Ah, that sounds more like the Establishment or the WhiteHouse, or…. Funny how Bush and co turns every American to kids, scaring the shit out of them about the boogey who is coming to take away their freedom.

And the US media joins in, especially Faux Noise, making us believe these monsters are our biggest nightmare, yet Al-Qaedi can’t even touch the unsecured and hated royal sh****t heads down here in Saudi-Arabia, the home land of Osama-boogeyman.

Well lets see how many face the boogeyman would further possess. At first it was Osama. Later Sadam. Now its a whole country, Iran. Well, maybe by next 2-10 years after Iran has been fully de-nucularized by our nukes, it would then be Syria, then the Saudis, while the constitution becomes more edited and tweaked, all in the name of killing the “monsters”.

Yeah. Tweaked by the all powerful Jews, who are here to let the world know that this nation was never to be named USA, but USI. Know what is, the United States of Israel. The run the country. No matter what you believe or disbelieve. We are just a big dobberman for them. They hold the leash.

It was self serving alright. 9/11 was essential for the neocons and their PNAC agenda.