Follow the link: http://www.rawstory.com/news/2007/Government_watchdog_says_control_spending_or_0115.html

Theresa

Mr Maliki said the US “refusal” to provide Baghdad’s security forces with adequate weaponry and other equipment was slowing down the withdrawal of US troops.

“I believe that such statements give moral boosts to the terrorists and push them towards making an extra effort and making them believe that they have defeated the American administration, but I can tell you that they haven’t defeated the Iraqi government.”

He said he did not think his government was on borrowed time. “Secretary Rice is expressing her own point of view if she thinks that the government is on borrowed time, whether it is borrowed time for the Iraqi government or American administration.”

BRILLIANT MALIKI AND SISTANI HAVE OUTFOXED BUSH AND CHENEY WELL DONE MATES

They can’t account (there’s that word again mighty aphrodite) for the no bid contracts and the buildings that weren’t completed and the infrastructure jobs that were going to happen.

Accountability??? We don’t need no stinking accountability!!!!!

These guys are so lame!!!!!

BUSH is responsible for the death of his won troops then

America’s refusal to give Baghdad’s security forces sufficient guns and equipment has cost a great number of lives, the Iraqi Prime Minister said yesterday.

Nouri al-Maliki said the insurgency had been bloodier and prolonged because Washington had refused to part with equipment. If it released the necessary arms, US forces could “dramatically” cut their numbers in three to six months, he told The Times.

Maybe it is necessary foreplay to build a consensus that impeachment is the only remedy. If so, let the foreplay begin.

The question then becomes, “Why isn’t the administration being barraged with many, many supoenas TODAY by each and every Democratically controlled committee?”

It seems to me that THIS is the issue that needs to be pressed with our elected officials, because only this course will eventually lead to a majority for impeachment.

And what is one of the consequences of the decision not to properly equip the Iraqi forces. More American deaths!

What has Bush proposed in the way of changing the rules of engagement? Transfer some of the soldiers involved with force protection to embedding with Iraqi forces. And what is one of the consequences of this decision? More American deaths.

Why does Bush hate the soldiers so much?

So It was nice knowing America ( NOT) now put the borders of Isreal back to 1967 like the international community want and ALL Arabb countries and In future just stay in your little Bubble and leave the world ALONE you hear me

“Of the people that you’ve trained, how many are left? To what extent do they have loyalty to the unified government of Iraq? To what extent are they properly equipped? To what extent do they have appropriate support?”

You can’t expect the Decidicator to worry about such trifling issues when there’s decidificationalizing to be done!

If this country of ours desires a protracted fight which maintains a “foothold” in the natural resources of that country, we MUST NOT allow the Iraqis to fend for themselves – ergo – our “surging” troops and not surging weaponry for their troops. What a con game, indeed!

More smoke and mirros of Bushco and Al-Maliki is calling a spade a spade. Finally, someone has the moxie to do so. Maliki said that he’s dissing Bush’s plan and, instead, would like american support in the way of weapons & military machinery. Now shouldn’t that make perfect sense to anyone with sanity and at least a grade school education these days???

But no….we play the charade game and lie to ourselves repeatedly while presenting an IMPOSSIBLE mantra “We’ll stand down when the Iraqi military stand up”…well, without our supplying them with the necessary tools (something we haven’t even done for our own soldiers for cripe’s sakes)….they can and will never “stand up”.

More jokes, charades and chicanery on the american people by the Bushbots!