<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AEI Letter Offers $10,000 Payments Only For Views Critical Of The IPCC Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:26:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: How To Size Digital Images For Printing</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/comment-page-3/#comment-4301700</link>
		<dc:creator>How To Size Digital Images For Printing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/#comment-4301700</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Basic Digital Photography - Capturing Night Time Images&lt;/strong&gt;

From sparkling city skylines to moonlit rural landscapes, night time scenes can be enchanting. Although digital cameras are capable of capturing more color within a night scene than the human eye is capable of registering, capturing such a view require...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Basic Digital Photography &#8211; Capturing Night Time Images</strong></p>
<p>From sparkling city skylines to moonlit rural landscapes, night time scenes can be enchanting. Although digital cameras are capable of capturing more color within a night scene than the human eye is capable of registering, capturing such a view require&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=4301700', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dear Kitty. Some blog :: American Enterprise Institute financing climate junk science: document :: February :: 2007</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/comment-page-3/#comment-1730401</link>
		<dc:creator>Dear Kitty. Some blog :: American Enterprise Institute financing climate junk science: document :: February :: 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 19:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/#comment-1730401</guid>
		<description>[...] Think Progress blog in the USA: AEI Letter Offers $10,000 Payments Only For Views Critical Of The IPCC [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Think Progress blog in the USA: AEI Letter Offers $10,000 Payments Only For Views Critical Of The IPCC [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1730401', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/comment-page-3/#comment-1662703</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 04:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/#comment-1662703</guid>
		<description>I agree with you Vince, it would be better for the government to take the lead, but they aren&#039;t.  A growing number of state governments are currently taking the initiative on several of these issues.  We just need the federal government to start.  And like you said, that would be better than an external agency regulating it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Vince, it would be better for the government to take the lead, but they aren&#8217;t.  A growing number of state governments are currently taking the initiative on several of these issues.  We just need the federal government to start.  And like you said, that would be better than an external agency regulating it.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1662703', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince P</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/comment-page-3/#comment-1660813</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 01:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/#comment-1660813</guid>
		<description>Nothing wrong with your objectives, what I find objectionable is having our economy regulated by some external authority.  So if the US govt or a local State govt wanted to pursue those goals for their own sake, I have no objection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing wrong with your objectives, what I find objectionable is having our economy regulated by some external authority.  So if the US govt or a local State govt wanted to pursue those goals for their own sake, I have no objection.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1660813', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/comment-page-2/#comment-1660727</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 01:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/#comment-1660727</guid>
		<description>Vince P.  My argument is that even if human induced climate change is not occurring, we should still be working towards lowering emissions, improving automobile mileage standards, cleaning up pollution, making energy distribution more efficient, and developing more sustainable forests.  Aren&#039;t those all good things?  We should start addressing the issues in a globally, smart and economical  process.  This would create cleaner communities, save people money and create jobs in the long run without jeopardizing the current economy.  Instead each political side is currently stuck in blaming the other side through partisan politics and not much has been accomplished in the past 30 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vince P.  My argument is that even if human induced climate change is not occurring, we should still be working towards lowering emissions, improving automobile mileage standards, cleaning up pollution, making energy distribution more efficient, and developing more sustainable forests.  Aren&#8217;t those all good things?  We should start addressing the issues in a globally, smart and economical  process.  This would create cleaner communities, save people money and create jobs in the long run without jeopardizing the current economy.  Instead each political side is currently stuck in blaming the other side through partisan politics and not much has been accomplished in the past 30 years.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1660727', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince P</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/comment-page-2/#comment-1654090</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 08:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/#comment-1654090</guid>
		<description>Dave: I didn&#039;t comment on the validity of thesis that the earth is warming.  If it is, then fine, it is.   What I challenge is the anthropomorphic view that humans are the cause of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave: I didn&#8217;t comment on the validity of thesis that the earth is warming.  If it is, then fine, it is.   What I challenge is the anthropomorphic view that humans are the cause of it.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1654090', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/comment-page-2/#comment-1652764</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 03:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/#comment-1652764</guid>
		<description>Vince P.  The current data saying the Earth is warming is based on ongoing scientific research by World wide non-partisan organizations.  Regardless if one believes the warming is human induced or not, it&#039;s been proven that there is indeed a warming trend.  Claiming that the Earth can&#039;t be on a warming trend because it snowed in Minnesota one day or an ice storm hit Boston is unscientific, not time proven, and not globally considered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vince P.  The current data saying the Earth is warming is based on ongoing scientific research by World wide non-partisan organizations.  Regardless if one believes the warming is human induced or not, it&#8217;s been proven that there is indeed a warming trend.  Claiming that the Earth can&#8217;t be on a warming trend because it snowed in Minnesota one day or an ice storm hit Boston is unscientific, not time proven, and not globally considered.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1652764', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Gorton</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/comment-page-2/#comment-1642921</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Gorton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 06:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/#comment-1642921</guid>
		<description>People keep on forgetting, as has been demonstrated by the righties here, that the rightwhinge &lt;em&gt;likes being lied to.&lt;/em&gt; Look at &#039;em, they are arguing in favour of an organisation which is outright offering bribes to anyone who can speak out against global warming.

That is the final distinction, the rightwhinge, unlike the rightwing which is just generally mistaken, likes being wrong. 

Newsflash Rightwhinge: We don&#039;t really care if your feelings get hurt you wussies, we don&#039;t care if you don&#039;t like the truth, and frankly we don&#039;t care if you think that this will mean you won&#039;t get that armegeddon you want so badly. 

You bastards have ignored warning after warning, and frankly there is a school of thought within scientific communities which states that it is too late because you wankers refused to listen to people who actually spent their entire adult lives studying the subject. It was far more convenient for you rightwhingers to pooh-pooh the idea and attack the messengers, even on shit which didn&#039;t actually happen.

We don&#039;t care anymore whether or not we have your buy in, we care about making sure that tomorrow, we have a world we can live in. We don&#039;t care whether or not you respect us, because frankly you lost our respect years ago when you started championing torture and calling that America&#039;s ideals. We don&#039;t care about your opinion anymore because you whiny sots have proven once and for all that your opinion is not worth anything.

And if I am coming off as being a bit emotional, well lets just say its the whole survival of the species thing speaking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People keep on forgetting, as has been demonstrated by the righties here, that the rightwhinge <em>likes being lied to.</em> Look at &#8216;em, they are arguing in favour of an organisation which is outright offering bribes to anyone who can speak out against global warming.</p>
<p>That is the final distinction, the rightwhinge, unlike the rightwing which is just generally mistaken, likes being wrong. </p>
<p>Newsflash Rightwhinge: We don&#8217;t really care if your feelings get hurt you wussies, we don&#8217;t care if you don&#8217;t like the truth, and frankly we don&#8217;t care if you think that this will mean you won&#8217;t get that armegeddon you want so badly. </p>
<p>You bastards have ignored warning after warning, and frankly there is a school of thought within scientific communities which states that it is too late because you wankers refused to listen to people who actually spent their entire adult lives studying the subject. It was far more convenient for you rightwhingers to pooh-pooh the idea and attack the messengers, even on shit which didn&#8217;t actually happen.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t care anymore whether or not we have your buy in, we care about making sure that tomorrow, we have a world we can live in. We don&#8217;t care whether or not you respect us, because frankly you lost our respect years ago when you started championing torture and calling that America&#8217;s ideals. We don&#8217;t care about your opinion anymore because you whiny sots have proven once and for all that your opinion is not worth anything.</p>
<p>And if I am coming off as being a bit emotional, well lets just say its the whole survival of the species thing speaking.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1642921', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: valiant venus</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/comment-page-2/#comment-1642756</link>
		<dc:creator>valiant venus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 05:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/#comment-1642756</guid>
		<description>&quot;The only matter that AIE is concerned about is fecal matter, because theyâ€™re a bunch of shitheads. &quot; Lib in NM

&quot;Liberal&quot; is such a pretty name for such an ugly poster.   Your mom said to tell the thread she doesn&#039;t know where you picked up such dirty language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The only matter that AIE is concerned about is fecal matter, because theyâ€™re a bunch of shitheads. &#8221; Lib in NM</p>
<p>&#8220;Liberal&#8221; is such a pretty name for such an ugly poster.   Your mom said to tell the thread she doesn&#8217;t know where you picked up such dirty language.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1642756', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince P</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/comment-page-2/#comment-1641929</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 04:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/#comment-1641929</guid>
		<description>105: 

I already brought up that point back on Jan 29 on this thread

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/29/13-percent-of-americans-global-warming


Quote 54:

Itâ€™s not â€œGlobal Warmingâ€ anymore, now itâ€™s â€œClimate Changeâ€ , that way no matter what the weather does, the Leftist Tryannists (I made up that word) can continue thier attempt to destroy Industry.

Comment by Vince P â€” January 29, 2007 @ 11:09 pm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>105: </p>
<p>I already brought up that point back on Jan 29 on this thread</p>
<p><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/29/13-percent-of-americans-global-warming" rel="nofollow">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/29/13-percent-of-americans-global-warming</a></p>
<p>Quote 54:</p>
<p>Itâ€™s not â€œGlobal Warmingâ€ anymore, now itâ€™s â€œClimate Changeâ€ , that way no matter what the weather does, the Leftist Tryannists (I made up that word) can continue thier attempt to destroy Industry.</p>
<p>Comment by Vince P â€” January 29, 2007 @ 11:09 pm<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1641929', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/comment-page-2/#comment-1641069</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 00:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/#comment-1641069</guid>
		<description>I think we all need to stop refering to it as â€œGlobal Warming,â€ and start using the broader name of â€œClimate Change.&quot;  Global Warming is just part of human induced Climate Change.  If we use â€œClimate Change,â€ it wonâ€™t be as easy for Fox News and similar skeptics to say Global Warming can&#039;t be true because itâ€™s 20 below zero in the Midwest, or an ice storm just hit the east coast.  Research studies and documents refer to the broader problem as Climate Change, I think itâ€™s time for the media and the public to do the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we all need to stop refering to it as â€œGlobal Warming,â€ and start using the broader name of â€œClimate Change.&#8221;  Global Warming is just part of human induced Climate Change.  If we use â€œClimate Change,â€ it wonâ€™t be as easy for Fox News and similar skeptics to say Global Warming can&#8217;t be true because itâ€™s 20 below zero in the Midwest, or an ice storm just hit the east coast.  Research studies and documents refer to the broader problem as Climate Change, I think itâ€™s time for the media and the public to do the same.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1641069', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VerbalKunt</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/comment-page-2/#comment-1640537</link>
		<dc:creator>VerbalKunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 00:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/#comment-1640537</guid>
		<description>Barfly,

When can I tongue your browneye?

Ooops! wrong blog.

TP PLEASE DO NOT LET THIS GO THRU

too la</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barfly,</p>
<p>When can I tongue your browneye?</p>
<p>Ooops! wrong blog.</p>
<p>TP PLEASE DO NOT LET THIS GO THRU</p>
<p>too la<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1640537', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barfly</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/comment-page-2/#comment-1640342</link>
		<dc:creator>Barfly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 23:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/#comment-1640342</guid>
		<description>Comment by Barfly 

[SQUEEK! SQUEEK!]

Rachael! Come here girl! Youâ€™ve got poop on your foot, and youâ€™re leaving tracks all over the place! Sit! Rachael! Sit! Iâ€™ve got your favorite chew toy . . .

[SQUEEK! SQUEEK!]

Comment by Barfly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment by Barfly </p>
<p>[SQUEEK! SQUEEK!]</p>
<p>Rachael! Come here girl! Youâ€™ve got poop on your foot, and youâ€™re leaving tracks all over the place! Sit! Rachael! Sit! Iâ€™ve got your favorite chew toy . . .</p>
<p>[SQUEEK! SQUEEK!]</p>
<p>Comment by Barfly<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1640342', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt G. Warnken</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/comment-page-2/#comment-1639769</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt G. Warnken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 21:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/#comment-1639769</guid>
		<description>Hello, All.  I feel somewhat like a party crasher here, but I just want to make a few counterpoints.  It won&#039;t take long.

1. Four years ago, my wife and I were finally able to take the &quot;inland passage&quot; Alaskan cruise.  I remember well the glaciers, the historical maps showing the steady (almost unanimous) glacial recessions decade by decade, since Capt. James Cook (1795&#039;ish) to present.  

Logical conclusion:  The Earth is in a long term warming trend, at least since the time when these glaciers formed.  This warming trend commenced without any help or hindrance from mankind.  

This means the warming trend might well continue, without any help or hindrance from mankind.  So, if our ultimate goal is to stop &quot;global warming&quot;, we may be frustrated by Mother Nature.  If our goal is redefined to &quot;stop human caused global warming&quot;, that&#039;s a little better, except it becomes pretty hard to measure.  How much of a temperature rise do we attribute to Nature, and how much of the same rise do we attribute to human activity?  That answer can get pretty political.

Less political, and more scientific, is the data on CO2 the past 100 years or so.  Earth is teeming with, as Spock would say, &quot;carbon based life forms&quot;.  When carbon is increased on the planet&#039;s surface, carbon based life forms increase.  (If you have a favorite plant or animal, there&#039;s a good chance it&#039;s a carbon based life form!)  There are too many scientific studies to mention here, we can just say it&#039;s what one would expect in the model, and it&#039;s what one has seen in the real world in the last century.  
&lt;strong&gt;Hey, wait a minute.  This would mean that as we bring more crust embedded fossil fuels to the surface, we actually increase life on the planet!  Well, yes, that&#039;s what it means&lt;/strong&gt;... it&#039;s just a scientific fact which we need to acknowledge for honesty&#039;s sake. 

Does this mean we can go about our collective lives polluting at will, bulldozing down the Amazon forests, and putting Shamu in a glass tank? Not hardly!  We still have to take care of where we live, as best we can.  

But this doesn&#039;t mean shouting down anybody who disagrees with the current (and always moving) tide of consensus.  Drs. Sally Baliunas and Willie Soon, for instance, are real scientists, with real data, and real arguments suggesting that we move a little carefully with this current craze.  In the pursuit of the Truth (always a worthy endeavor), we should at least look at opposing sides of an issue to see if any merit exists, before we lock in our opinion.  

Later, guys...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, All.  I feel somewhat like a party crasher here, but I just want to make a few counterpoints.  It won&#8217;t take long.</p>
<p>1. Four years ago, my wife and I were finally able to take the &#8220;inland passage&#8221; Alaskan cruise.  I remember well the glaciers, the historical maps showing the steady (almost unanimous) glacial recessions decade by decade, since Capt. James Cook (1795&#8242;ish) to present.  </p>
<p>Logical conclusion:  The Earth is in a long term warming trend, at least since the time when these glaciers formed.  This warming trend commenced without any help or hindrance from mankind.  </p>
<p>This means the warming trend might well continue, without any help or hindrance from mankind.  So, if our ultimate goal is to stop &#8220;global warming&#8221;, we may be frustrated by Mother Nature.  If our goal is redefined to &#8220;stop human caused global warming&#8221;, that&#8217;s a little better, except it becomes pretty hard to measure.  How much of a temperature rise do we attribute to Nature, and how much of the same rise do we attribute to human activity?  That answer can get pretty political.</p>
<p>Less political, and more scientific, is the data on CO2 the past 100 years or so.  Earth is teeming with, as Spock would say, &#8220;carbon based life forms&#8221;.  When carbon is increased on the planet&#8217;s surface, carbon based life forms increase.  (If you have a favorite plant or animal, there&#8217;s a good chance it&#8217;s a carbon based life form!)  There are too many scientific studies to mention here, we can just say it&#8217;s what one would expect in the model, and it&#8217;s what one has seen in the real world in the last century.<br />
<strong>Hey, wait a minute.  This would mean that as we bring more crust embedded fossil fuels to the surface, we actually increase life on the planet!  Well, yes, that&#8217;s what it means</strong>&#8230; it&#8217;s just a scientific fact which we need to acknowledge for honesty&#8217;s sake. </p>
<p>Does this mean we can go about our collective lives polluting at will, bulldozing down the Amazon forests, and putting Shamu in a glass tank? Not hardly!  We still have to take care of where we live, as best we can.  </p>
<p>But this doesn&#8217;t mean shouting down anybody who disagrees with the current (and always moving) tide of consensus.  Drs. Sally Baliunas and Willie Soon, for instance, are real scientists, with real data, and real arguments suggesting that we move a little carefully with this current craze.  In the pursuit of the Truth (always a worthy endeavor), we should at least look at opposing sides of an issue to see if any merit exists, before we lock in our opinion.  </p>
<p>Later, guys&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1639769', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marie</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/comment-page-2/#comment-1638930</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 19:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/#comment-1638930</guid>
		<description>Bribery for lies!  Bribery for Lies!
Any takers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bribery for lies!  Bribery for Lies!<br />
Any takers?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1638930', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FP</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/comment-page-2/#comment-1638249</link>
		<dc:creator>FP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 17:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/#comment-1638249</guid>
		<description>AEI  

check this out  http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0612-09.htm

U.S. Conservatives Take Aim at NGOs



&quot;On the global political front, international NGOs, which led the fight for the global ban on anti-personnel mines, the Kyoto Protocol to curb greenhouse-gas emissions, and the treaty establishing the International Criminal Court (ICC), are pursuing a &quot;liberal internationalist&quot; vision that is very much at odds with that of the Bush administration, according to American University law professor Kenneth Anderson&quot;


&quot;NGOs have created their own rules and regulations and demanded that governments and corporations abide by those rules,&quot; according to AEI and the conference co-sponsor, the rightist Institute of Public Affairs of Australia. &quot;Politicians and corporate leaders are often forced to respond to the NGO media machine, and the resources of taxpayers and shareholders are used in support of ends they did not sanction.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AEI  </p>
<p>check this out  <a href="http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0612-09.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0612-09.htm</a></p>
<p>U.S. Conservatives Take Aim at NGOs</p>
<p>&#8220;On the global political front, international NGOs, which led the fight for the global ban on anti-personnel mines, the Kyoto Protocol to curb greenhouse-gas emissions, and the treaty establishing the International Criminal Court (ICC), are pursuing a &#8220;liberal internationalist&#8221; vision that is very much at odds with that of the Bush administration, according to American University law professor Kenneth Anderson&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;NGOs have created their own rules and regulations and demanded that governments and corporations abide by those rules,&#8221; according to AEI and the conference co-sponsor, the rightist Institute of Public Affairs of Australia. &#8220;Politicians and corporate leaders are often forced to respond to the NGO media machine, and the resources of taxpayers and shareholders are used in support of ends they did not sanction.&#8221;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1638249', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ethan</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/comment-page-2/#comment-1638134</link>
		<dc:creator>ethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 16:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/#comment-1638134</guid>
		<description>This is kinda off-topic from the AEI idiocy, but if anybody hasnt had a chance to check out the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.truths.treehugger.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;convenient truths video contest&lt;/a&gt;, you should scope it out. Videos have to be between 1 minute and 2 minutes and can be shot with a digicam or cell phone cam... so anyone can do it. Not too many entries so your chances of winning are actually pretty damn good. 26 days to submit... workin on mine...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is kinda off-topic from the AEI idiocy, but if anybody hasnt had a chance to check out the <a href="http://www.truths.treehugger.com/" rel="nofollow">convenient truths video contest</a>, you should scope it out. Videos have to be between 1 minute and 2 minutes and can be shot with a digicam or cell phone cam&#8230; so anyone can do it. Not too many entries so your chances of winning are actually pretty damn good. 26 days to submit&#8230; workin on mine&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1638134', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PoliticalCritic</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/comment-page-2/#comment-1637165</link>
		<dc:creator>PoliticalCritic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 15:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/#comment-1637165</guid>
		<description>That figures.  It&#039;s the only way you&#039;ll get people to speak out against global warming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That figures.  It&#8217;s the only way you&#8217;ll get people to speak out against global warming.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1637165', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otto Rank</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/comment-page-2/#comment-1636761</link>
		<dc:creator>Otto Rank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 13:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/#comment-1636761</guid>
		<description>The AEI&#039;s letter made me laugh.  These nimrods don&#039;t even know that honoraria is a plural.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The AEI&#8217;s letter made me laugh.  These nimrods don&#8217;t even know that honoraria is a plural.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1636761', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Gorton</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/comment-page-2/#comment-1635071</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Gorton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 09:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/03/aei-letter/#comment-1635071</guid>
		<description>pissed off taxpayer 

Ways to show the Rightwing are idiots:

1: Point out the thread they are on is one all about &quot;Conservatives&quot; bribing people to tell lies about their research.

2: Point out that you can&#039;t accuse liberals of limousine liberalism, and then try to put them down as unemployed.

3: Point out that the vast majority of university students and graduates have always traditionally been liberals.

4: Point out that you can&#039;t accuse the American judiciary of being liberal - while at the same time accusing liberals of being unemployed.

5: Point out that the so-called liberal media may well be liberal for a reason - namely the BS the rightwing spews being, in fact, BS.

6:  Point out that for all of their tough talk on the war on terrorism, conservatives seem happy, indeed thrilled, to fund the people who fund terrorism via fighting against anybody even suggesting, that going off of oil would be a good idea (40% of the world&#039;s oil comes from the Middle East, along with Hezbollah, Al Qaeada, and any number of terrorist groups.)

7: Point out that for all of their tough talk on the economy, the Republicans have achieved the worst deficits in American history - without including the Iraq war in those deficits.

8: Point out that for all their tough talk on supporting the troops, the Republicans have sent those troops into a warzone, where if the troops lose equipment in combat, they are obliged to pay for that equipment. Further, those troops have been given sub-par equipment in the first place.

9: Point out that for all of their self-righteousness on gays getting married, for all of that vague talk about &quot;American values&quot; conservatives spew, the rightwing will solidly defend its government&#039;s right to torture, invade their privacy, and silence their freedom of speech.

10: Point out that for all of their claims against the liberal hippies of the sixties, those hippies won and then moved on with their very successful lives as doctors, lawyers, bankers, manufacturers etc... The losers apparently have not.

And as a bonus point...

11: Point out that for all of their tough talk on corruption, K Street was a purely Republican bribery scandal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pissed off taxpayer </p>
<p>Ways to show the Rightwing are idiots:</p>
<p>1: Point out the thread they are on is one all about &#8220;Conservatives&#8221; bribing people to tell lies about their research.</p>
<p>2: Point out that you can&#8217;t accuse liberals of limousine liberalism, and then try to put them down as unemployed.</p>
<p>3: Point out that the vast majority of university students and graduates have always traditionally been liberals.</p>
<p>4: Point out that you can&#8217;t accuse the American judiciary of being liberal &#8211; while at the same time accusing liberals of being unemployed.</p>
<p>5: Point out that the so-called liberal media may well be liberal for a reason &#8211; namely the BS the rightwing spews being, in fact, BS.</p>
<p>6:  Point out that for all of their tough talk on the war on terrorism, conservatives seem happy, indeed thrilled, to fund the people who fund terrorism via fighting against anybody even suggesting, that going off of oil would be a good idea (40% of the world&#8217;s oil comes from the Middle East, along with Hezbollah, Al Qaeada, and any number of terrorist groups.)</p>
<p>7: Point out that for all of their tough talk on the economy, the Republicans have achieved the worst deficits in American history &#8211; without including the Iraq war in those deficits.</p>
<p>8: Point out that for all their tough talk on supporting the troops, the Republicans have sent those troops into a warzone, where if the troops lose equipment in combat, they are obliged to pay for that equipment. Further, those troops have been given sub-par equipment in the first place.</p>
<p>9: Point out that for all of their self-righteousness on gays getting married, for all of that vague talk about &#8220;American values&#8221; conservatives spew, the rightwing will solidly defend its government&#8217;s right to torture, invade their privacy, and silence their freedom of speech.</p>
<p>10: Point out that for all of their claims against the liberal hippies of the sixties, those hippies won and then moved on with their very successful lives as doctors, lawyers, bankers, manufacturers etc&#8230; The losers apparently have not.</p>
<p>And as a bonus point&#8230;</p>
<p>11: Point out that for all of their tough talk on corruption, K Street was a purely Republican bribery scandal.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1635071', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
