I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

Now we know why Venus is your alias, as it means you’re the spawn of Uranus :)

And apparently, so is your link, as it doesn’t work as you advertised! One hopes you have more attention to detail in your personal life, than you do in your political/blogging one!

Oh, and ‘you’re welcome’ for my concern about your utter failure with this post! It must be awful being you!

BnF – Go to Snopes.com – “Democrats and WMD’s” will bring up the quotes of the Dem pols I listed. In honor of honest clarifications (shocking on liBlogs, I know), continue reading and context will be given.

You’re welcome.

Comment by valiant venus — February 4, 2007 @ 5:31 pm

The search returned validation on specific statements… Venus, did you not read the other 10 pages below explaining how most of those comments were not relevant to the subject of invading Iraq a-la-GW Bush?

I think if you’re going to cite research, you MIGHT want to read the whole thing before posting. It does make you look a bit… less credible.

(/politeness filter)

Comment by Liberal in New Mexico

My first laugh of the day!!! :>D

Try running only the words, i.e., without the quotation marks.

You’ll get an article that explains the list of quotations is given without context or is incomplete or is augmented. When correct quotation is given, the speakers almost invariably qualify their statements with variations of “if Saddam has WMD,” or “let the UN handle it.” I could find no instances of the sort of bald-faced lies and distortions of which the current administration is guilty.

http://www.tekno-world.blogspot.com

I did. This is what I found:

Sorry, no matches were found containing “Democrats and WMD’s” .

So much for your assertions. When it comes to supporting your arguments, you come up with a big nothing. Not that I’m all that surprised.

You’ve got the right name.
From a fellow BCer, and straight I might add, it’s truly unbelievable that there are still bigoted putz’s like you out there.
Here’s a link to the wikipedia definition of the bill:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_C-250

Bill C-250 is a law, endorsed by Amnesty International, to protect a minority group (in this case gays and lesbians) from violence and hate crimes, strictly because of their sexual orientation. To equate this with endorsing or encouraging pedophile behavior is ludicrous, and hate-mongering in its own right.

Funny how the sexually suppressed far right are the usual suspects in so many pedophile cases, though.

Look! A mushroom cloud!

Bummer, they just shit themselves again.

I wish there was a way to force these evil f*cking trolls to step up and really defend Boy George. Suit up bitches and go to Iraq to protect freedom and support your egotistical psychotic leader.

Or, you could just STFU.

the “Comrade” network is worldwide – but you knew that.

You mean that’s a Red under my bed? I thought it was the boogey man. Your fearmongering is out-of-date venus. You need to find something else to scare your children with.

People around the world do wonder why, if 2 thirds of Americans (now) oppose the Busheviks, they can’t or won’t stop him as he prepares to escalate in Iraq and attack Iran

When can I tongue your browneye?

Ooops! wrong blog.

TP PLEASE DO NOT LET THIS GO THRU

too la

Comment by Jules — February 4, 2007 @ 6:11 pm

I think that sexual repression goes a long way towards explaining Republican psychology, at least within the party’s religious base. I used to work with a guy who was an ultra-right winger. His main news source was WorldNetDaily. He sincerely believed that Democrats were under the power of Satan. He once told me that people could only avoid sin if they had the fear of God’s retribution in them. He used exactly that word, fear. This is what drove him. What I find so interesting is that he was also obsessed with sex. He would find ways to work sex-related topics into ordinary conversation. You would be talking about one thing, and suddenly he would turn the conversation to transsexuals, or porn stars, or whatever. Very weird.