I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

Other gods, according to Creationism. And they had to have gods who created them, and soon and on and on… Until it demonstrates that Creation is not logical…

BTW Natural Selection doesn’t have sh!t to do with randomness.
Comment by Jason M. Sheeplovin — February 15, 2007 @ 3:18 pm

Of course it does.

The fact that you say it doesn’t shows you, once again, don’t know what you’re talking about.

Otherwise – if you were correct, weather people would be accurate a hell of a lot more often.

If you’d just READ the actual words of the actual Scientists themselves rather than someone else’s misguided interpretation of them, you’d understand why you can not win an argument here.

God put dinosaur bones in the ground to test our faith … and there is a tea pot in orbit around Mars.

BTW Natural Selection doesn’t have sh!t to do with randomness.

Oh and by the way, I really want to punch as hard as I can the next person that says: “The kids should use their own judgment and choose what’s right.”

THAT’S NOT HOW SCIENCE WORKS. ok?

http://www.venganza.org/about/open-letter/

Well, if it were able to be replicated, then it would be proven to be true. All we need it for God to re-create all of creation and then we would know that it was true.

Comment by Daryll

Where in the Bible does it say “Thou shalt not consume alcohol?” Let us know, cause Jesus must have missed it too.

Er, no.

I had to go back to this one comment because it was nagging me. You don’t know what a species is, nor what speciation means.

Please read about speciation, what it is, and the processes that lead to it.

In a nutshell, it is caused by genetic drift, which can take many, many generations. It doesn’t happen instantaneously, don’t be ridiculous.

Evolution is the accumulation of countless speciations and family diversifications to create all the varied lifeforms we see today.

Evolution is not synonimous with speciation. Speciation is a very particular instance in the evolutionary process.

In a nutshell, all the changes that occur within a population of any given species over time is evolution -aka, descent with modification. With enough time, these changes will eventually lead to speciation.

Check this site to get the basics on evolution.

Strawman borne out of the ignorance of what is known about human evolution.

Humans did not evolve from apes. Modern apes and humans evolved from a common ancestor.

Something must have been mentally wrong with Charles Darwin.

Coming from you, this is actually a compliment.

We have all seen what passes for “mental sanity” in your deluded mind.

You aren’t arguing, you’re just posting nonsense opinions on what the theory of evolution ’should-be’.

Differentiation is proven.
Speciation is proven.

Sorry, but the debate is over skippy, and Genesis lost the debate.

That’s nice, but in the world of genome plays, you can’t readily predict whether a mutation will occur or not. You don’t even have enough information to know when the coin is flipped, therefore you can’t create a formula for when something comes next.

For someone that claims to understand games, this basic premise disproves the theory of an intellect within Hendler.

The first step to producing the right equation is understanding the correct conditions, operations and intended / unintended outcomes. Comment by Jason M. Hendler — February 13, 2007 @ 11:26 pm

When you come up with an equation to predict when cosmic energy will produce a cellular mutation – then that will be interesting. Until them all of your posts on this topic are just blah, blah, blah – nothing.

Now continuous function statistics was always more difficult for me, but doable none the less. Comment by Jason M. Hendler — February 13, 2007 @ 11:26 pm

So’s adding 2+2 apparently.

When you resort to vulgar name calling, you get monitored and deleted whenever you sound remotely offensive. Keep it up and you’ll get banned permanently.

When you create your own theory, then you can decide a premise like this. A random event doesn’t require frequent reproducibility if that isn’t what the theory says.

This is just a ridiculous claim on your part to avoid reality. The theory of evolution simply states that speciation occurs, not that they should occur frequently enough to satisfy the he-man woman hater known as Hendler.

If you take a sorted deck and shuffle it, you should find a near random distribution of the cards. If you take a second sorted deck and shuffle it, you should again find a near random distribution of cards. The order of the cards in the two decks will be different, but they both will be shuffled. That is all I ask these scientists to do. Comment by Jason M. Hendler — February 13, 2007 @ 11:02 pm

BAHAHA, those are completely unrelated. The random event of mutation is random. The Genome is huge. A mutation significant enough to produce speciation in a specific species is enormous. Just because you believe this is how speciation should work, doesn’t mean it’s even related to evolution.

Your whole statement above is just the ramblings of the brain of a child that shows complete ignorance of evolution.

Simply create a controlled setting in which speciation is the only goal, and do it. It doesn’t matter how the speciation is achieved, it merely needs speciation. Comment by Jason M. Hendler — February 13, 2007 @ 11:02 pm

This posting is based on a fundamental set of flaws and ignorances. I corrected you before, you obviously have the intellect of a child, so I’ll reiterate.

1) The speciation is based on a random event. How can you have the goal to create a random event.
2) The speciation only needs to be observed having happened naturally to qualify for the theory of evolution – check.
3) Breeding doesn’t produce speciation if no random mutation events.
4) You can non-randomly speciate through genome manipulation, or allow nature to do it – those are your options.

But no matter how you slice it. Speciation has been observed – the debate is over. Evolution is a proven fact, whereas your 8000 year old earth is a disproven superstitious myth – just like your claim to have an Ivy League education.

Apparently not.

Now continuous function statistics was always more difficult for me, but doable none the less.
Comment by Jason M. Hendler — February 13, 2007 @ 11:26 pm

Again, apparently not…

Later Jason… As much as I just love debunking you, I really need to go to sleep.