Another question to ask Bush: Don’t you think there are enough weapons left in Irak from the Saddam period for 100 years? Do you think the iraki insurgents really need a few iranian weapons?

It would have been an act of insanity for the U.S.S.R. to attack the U.S. over Stinger missiles, just as it would have been insane for the U.S. to invade either the Soviet Union or China because they supplied North Vietnam with MIG 21s and AK-47s during the Vietnam war. Then again, when one considers the openly-stated, regime changing, world dominating goals of the neoconservative Project for a New American Century, perhaps insanity is precisely what we are dealing with.

Right it was about the TIMING of the attacks. Thank you.

“So Tracy, have you Republicans always been anti-american and anti-military, or do you just turn it on and off for partisan attacks?”

No that would be Democrats when they vote for something then try to distance themselves and blame others for their own lack of due diligence with respect to research before the cast a vote.

“It was only 8 years ago. I’m sure you can recall something to the effect of “WAG THE DOG!!!””

It has to do with the timing of the air strikes in Afghanistan to try and get bin Laden, not the air strike themselves.

“Yeah, it’s funny but the Iranians are charged with supporting and sending weapons to the same Shiite groups we support.”

We don’t support al Sadar’s death squads. Al Sadar might be a Shiite but he is not in support of the Iraqi government’s demands that the militas inside Iraq disarm. Why do you think that he just fled to Iran recently?

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2007-02-13-al-sadr-iran_x.htm

“Hey, we know Saudi Arabia has been providing weapons and arms to Sunni factions.”

The Saudi government is doing this?

“So you just made an inaccurate claim”

No, his claim was inaccurate. I was just pointing it out.

“I would say you’re not the smartest bulbs”

I would say the same for you considering you keep trying to say that that the link posted in #38 proves that the Iranians aren’t involved. The link doesn’t even mention the Iranians.

“Yet your claim still persists, without proof.”

What claim?

You’re welcome.

P.S. I hate cheeseburgers.

Comment by valiant mighty venus aphrodite — February 15, 2007 @ 10:37 am
(yawn)
still using that same old strawman (and trying to get the last post before the thread gets pushed outta site)?

Please cite “a fair of leftists” and use examples of giving aid and comforting the enemy.
And eat a friggin’ cheeseburger, for gawd’s sake!!!

Jason (AKA Venus wannabe) Patriotism does NOT fit the definition the hapless, yet proud Lefty, Kay ascribed. So you and Kay are wrong again.

From the American Heritage Dictionary,
“patriotic: – Feeling, expressing, or inspired by love for one’s country.”

Jason/Ryanne/btruthful, MORE proof that your opinion is baseless – and a majority of the Left are NOT patriotic. Listening to intellectual elitists from Berkeley to Columbia worry about offending those who might not want to see an American flag waving after 9/11 was enough to make me want to throw up. I haven’t been able to decide which the Left despises more:
a.) capitalism, with it’s winners and losers.
– OR –
b.) the United States, with it’s freedom AND responsibilities.

Dinnertime…….

Welcome to the 20th century…errr.

As a December 17, 1998, Los Angeles Times
article reported quoted Sen. Trent Lott who said:

“While I have been assured by administration officials that
there is no connection with the impeachment process in the
House of Representatives, I cannot support this military
action in the Persian Gulf at this time,” Lott said. “Both
the timing and the policy are subject to question.”

So Tracy, have you Republicans always been anti-american and anti-military, or do you just turn it on and off for partisan attacks?