Comments on: Senate moves to revoke 2002 Iraq authorization. http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/ Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:21:58 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Eric http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/comment-page-7/#comment-4870830 Eric Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:02:38 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/#comment-4870830 <strong>Eric</strong> Geat post. I added you to my blog roll! Eric

Geat post. I added you to my blog roll!

]]> By: Ass Thick Ass Babes Kick Ass http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/comment-page-7/#comment-4856980 Ass Thick Ass Babes Kick Ass Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:53:58 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/#comment-4856980 <strong>Ass Thick Ass Babes Kick Ass</strong> I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view Ass Thick Ass Babes Kick Ass

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

]]> By: Young Girls Young Teens Angus Young http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/comment-page-7/#comment-4767316 Young Girls Young Teens Angus Young Sun, 06 Apr 2008 10:56:45 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/#comment-4767316 <strong>Young Girls Young Teens Angus Young</strong> I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view Young Girls Young Teens Angus Young

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

]]> By: Eric http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/comment-page-7/#comment-4763190 Eric Sun, 06 Apr 2008 05:30:35 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/#comment-4763190 <strong>Eric</strong> Ok, I'm not in complete agreement with this, but I see your point. Thanks for sharing. Eric

Ok, I’m not in complete agreement with this, but I see your point. Thanks for sharing.

]]> By: Rug Lover http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/comment-page-7/#comment-4678344 Rug Lover Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:56:49 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/#comment-4678344 <strong>Rug Lover</strong> Rug Lover

]]> By: Teen Girls Teen Chat Teen Panties http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/comment-page-7/#comment-4619814 Teen Girls Teen Chat Teen Panties Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:55:44 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/#comment-4619814 <strong>Teen Girls Teen Chat Teen Panties</strong> I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view Teen Girls Teen Chat Teen Panties

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

]]> By: Teen Girls Teen Titans Raven Tiffany Teen http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/comment-page-7/#comment-4617010 Teen Girls Teen Titans Raven Tiffany Teen Sat, 29 Mar 2008 11:19:30 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/#comment-4617010 <strong>Teen Girls Teen Titans Raven Tiffany Teen</strong> I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view Teen Girls Teen Titans Raven Tiffany Teen

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

]]> By: Teen Girls Black Teens Kiss Lesbian Teen http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/comment-page-7/#comment-4616252 Teen Girls Black Teens Kiss Lesbian Teen Sat, 29 Mar 2008 10:29:05 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/#comment-4616252 <strong>Teen Girls Black Teens Kiss Lesbian Teen</strong> I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view Teen Girls Black Teens Kiss Lesbian Teen

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view

]]> By: Eric http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/comment-page-7/#comment-4608548 Eric Sat, 29 Mar 2008 00:27:56 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/#comment-4608548 <strong>Eric</strong> I think your mother would be proud. Eric

I think your mother would be proud.

]]> By: Nicole Ritchie http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/comment-page-7/#comment-4568578 Nicole Ritchie Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:57:11 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/#comment-4568578 <strong>Nicole Ritchie</strong> I Googled for something completely different, but found your page...and have to say thanks. nice read. Nicole Ritchie

I Googled for something completely different, but found your page…and have to say thanks. nice read.

]]> By: Ragheb Alama http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/comment-page-7/#comment-4450064 Ragheb Alama Mon, 24 Mar 2008 06:04:52 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/#comment-4450064 <strong>iqbal's</strong> Interesting post. I came across this blog by accident, but it was a good accident. I have now bookmarked your blog for future use. Best wishes. Ragheb Alama Website Team. iqbal’s

Interesting post. I came across this blog by accident, but it was a good accident. I have now bookmarked your blog for future use. Best wishes. Ragheb Alama Website Team.

]]> By: Think Progress » Lieberman Seeks To Block Iraq Provisions From 9/11 Bill http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/comment-page-7/#comment-1919397 Think Progress » Lieberman Seeks To Block Iraq Provisions From 9/11 Bill Mon, 26 Feb 2007 20:38:05 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/#comment-1919397 [...] announced their intention to revoke the 2002 Iraq war authorization, they said they planned to attach their legislation to a homeland security bill being debated this week. Thanks to Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT), who is the chairman of the homeland [...] [...] announced their intention to revoke the 2002 Iraq war authorization, they said they planned to attach their legislation to a homeland security bill being debated this week. Thanks to Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT), who is the chairman of the homeland [...]

]]> By: Exley http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/comment-page-7/#comment-1917824 Exley Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:09:09 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/#comment-1917824 #314, Thank you, Tom...I <em><strong>try</strong></em> to remain civil during these discussions...(I say "try" because I must admit I sometimes get snarky and sarcastic)...Civility keeps the discussions much more interesting and fruitful. #314,

Thank you, Tom…I try to remain civil during these discussions…(I say “try” because I must admit I sometimes get snarky and sarcastic)…Civility keeps the discussions much more interesting and fruitful.

]]> By: rachel kinnardi http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/comment-page-7/#comment-1878925 rachel kinnardi Sat, 24 Feb 2007 00:21:05 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/#comment-1878925 http://newsmine.org/ News and Document archive source for uncovering and exposing with over 10,000 articles and documents http://newsmine.org/

News and Document archive source for uncovering and exposing
with over 10,000 articles and documents

]]> By: tom baker http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/comment-page-7/#comment-1878062 tom baker Fri, 23 Feb 2007 23:38:25 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/#comment-1878062 i'd be tempted to say "solipsistic sophist", too, but there would still be a margin of error in accuracy. i also have to give you credit for remaining civil, and having a sense of humor - a little self-deprecation goes a long way, something i could improve on myself. i’d be tempted to say “solipsistic sophist”, too, but there would still be a margin of error in accuracy.

i also have to give you credit for remaining civil, and having a sense of humor – a little self-deprecation goes a long way, something i could improve on myself.

]]> By: Exley http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/comment-page-7/#comment-1878022 Exley Fri, 23 Feb 2007 23:30:47 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/#comment-1878022 Tom, <em>"it’s just that “pedantic prevaricator” was such a fun nickname."</em> It does have a certain pizzazz to it. How about "Obstinate Obfuscator?" Tom, “it’s just that “pedantic prevaricator” was such a fun nickname.”

It does have a certain pizzazz to it.

How about “Obstinate Obfuscator?”

]]> By: tom baker http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/comment-page-7/#comment-1877897 tom baker Fri, 23 Feb 2007 23:13:55 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/#comment-1877897 Ex - the big point is that, presence or no, there was no justification for invasion based on a 9/11 premise. to deny that was a premise is dishonest - green zone mess halls feature murals of the towers, for cryin out loud. you are precise yes, but you are inaccurate, and there's a substantial difference between the two (an arrow that flies straight is precise - an arrow that is accurate hits the target). you follow the transcript perfectly, to a mistaken conclusion. you have a pile of rhetorically, factually, perfect Legos, and from them you construct unicorns. you know, you're really more a sophist than a prevaricator, using true premises to fashion an argument that is logically coherent, but factually false in its conclusion. possessing that is not possession of a philosophy or an opinion, it is willful possession of fallacy, otherwise known in philosophical circles as sophistry. it's just that "pedantic prevaricator" was such a fun nickname. Ex – the big point is that, presence or no, there was no justification for invasion based on a 9/11 premise. to deny that was a premise is dishonest – green zone mess halls feature murals of the towers, for cryin out loud.

you are precise yes, but you are inaccurate, and there’s a substantial difference between the two (an arrow that flies straight is precise – an arrow that is accurate hits the target). you follow the transcript perfectly, to a mistaken conclusion. you have a pile of rhetorically, factually, perfect Legos, and from them you construct unicorns.

you know, you’re really more a sophist than a prevaricator, using true premises to fashion an argument that is logically coherent, but factually false in its conclusion. possessing that is not possession of a philosophy or an opinion, it is willful possession of fallacy, otherwise known in philosophical circles as sophistry. it’s just that “pedantic prevaricator” was such a fun nickname.

]]> By: Exley http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/comment-page-7/#comment-1877844 Exley Fri, 23 Feb 2007 23:06:20 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/#comment-1877844 #304 Democrat Soldier, I am not saying that Al Qaeda's presence was of such magnitude or that the relationship between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda was so significant that it justified the invasion (Admittedly, I used to believe it did. Now I am not quite so certain)....My postings #290 and 297 were narrowly tailored and meant to address soley VVGFU's assertion that "there is no dispute" that Al Qaeda was in Iraq before March 2003. As I showed, there is indeed evidence that there was an Al Qaeda presence in Iraq before the U.S.-led invasion. Thus, the matter of Al Qaeda's pre-war presence in Iraq is indeed open to debate and "dispute." #304 Democrat Soldier,

I am not saying that Al Qaeda’s presence was of such magnitude or that the relationship between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda was so significant that it justified the invasion (Admittedly, I used to believe it did. Now I am not quite so certain)….My postings #290 and 297 were narrowly tailored and meant to address soley VVGFU’s assertion that “there is no dispute” that Al Qaeda was in Iraq before March 2003. As I showed, there is indeed evidence that there was an Al Qaeda presence in Iraq before the U.S.-led invasion. Thus, the matter of Al Qaeda’s pre-war presence in Iraq is indeed open to debate and “dispute.”

]]> By: Vince P http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/comment-page-7/#comment-1877744 Vince P Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:49:42 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/#comment-1877744 tom: your little mind's wonderings dont change the facts of today's world tom: your little mind’s wonderings dont change the facts of today’s world

]]> By: tom baker http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/comment-page-7/#comment-1877722 tom baker Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:47:05 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/22/senate-moves-to-revoke-2002-iraq-authorization/#comment-1877722 really vince? - the russians didn't fight the afghans for over a decade? what about chechnya? what about the kosovars, the albanians, the british (do you know how long they fought the ira vince?) myopic doesn't begin to describe the limitations on your background knowledge. what about Israel's military? Turkey's? never gone toe-to-toe with radical factions have they? You'd actually be right if you said that no one's ever fought terrorism less effectively than we have. you're edging over into raving lunatic territory vince really vince? – the russians didn’t fight the afghans for over a decade? what about chechnya? what about the kosovars, the albanians, the british (do you know how long they fought the ira vince?) myopic doesn’t begin to describe the limitations on your background knowledge.

what about Israel’s military? Turkey’s? never gone toe-to-toe with radical factions have they? You’d actually be right if you said that no one’s ever fought terrorism less effectively than we have.

you’re edging over into raving lunatic territory vince

]]>