Michelle Malkin to co-host new Fox show.
By on Feb 23rd, 2007 at 12:09 pm
Michelle Malkin to co-host new Fox show.
“Fox News Channel is testing another pilot on Sunday that will air following its experiment in news satire, ‘The ½ Hour News Hour.’ ‘It’s Out There,’ a half-hour of stories derived from blogs, will get a half-hour test run following Joel Surnow’s satirical take on news. [The show], fronted by conservative blogger-columnist Michele Malkin and former Clinton administration operative Kirsten Powers, will take on political and cultural issues enflaming the blogosphere.”
View Most Popular
Advertisement
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Afghanistan
Bachmann
Beck
Boehner
Bush
Cheney
Civil Rights
Congress
Corporate Ethics
Dobbs
Economy
Education
Election
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Gingrich
Global Warming
Health Care
Immigration
International Relations
Iraq
Justice
LGBT
Lieberman
Limbaugh
Maddow
McCain
Media
Military
Obama
Palin
Pelosi
Public Plan
Race
Radical Right
Religion
Sports
Steele
Steve King
Stimulus
Tea Parties
Technology
Women's Rights
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
Reports
In-depth studies on select topics
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
ArchivesBlog Roll
Should be an outstanding program, Malkin is great.
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:10 pmThis ought to be interesting.
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:11 pmI wonder if I can get the spittle wiping up contract?
Can’t wait! Can’t wait!
I’ve got to get my TV back….
No, on second thought…..no.
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:11 pmwoo-hoo – love the smell of Fox Desperation in the morning….where will they find the next anchor(no pun) to hang around their neck?? Glad I’m not in a board room with Rupert and Roger these days.
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:12 pmIs this an attempt to distract the truth from bloggers?
I say we ignore it all.
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:13 pmwoo-hoo – love the smell of Fox Desperation in the morning
Could be worse, they could have Olbermann’s ratings.
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:16 pm….farewell, friends….
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:16 pmWait…a show on Fox featuring some bombastic righty and a well-spoken but token lefty….nah….they’ve NEVER done that before, have they?
Signed,
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:16 pmHannity
haha, i guess they are hoping to pull in viewers to this show from their ‘comedy’ show? hahahahaha. Even though both shows are only a half-hour, I hope they run the laugh track for the full hour.
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:20 pmJoy…one more reason to hate FOX…as if any more reasons were necessary…
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:21 pmWe’ll just have to be content with second-string losers like Malkin, Coulter, et. al., until GDumbya leaves office. After that, FoxSnooze will be able to recruit the real losers to host their lousy shows.
You know . . . shows like “Chatting with Cheney”, “Ranting with Rice” and “Babbling with Bu$h”. That’ll be a real ratings bonanza for ‘em!
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:23 pmWe’re having a huge effect on Fox and the Wingnuts. They can no longer simply ignore or defame the left bloggers, they must structure their format around confronting us!
That’s just the tip of the iceberg of the power of Netroots.
More to come.
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:26 pmAs my name implies, I’m no fan of the network.
But this program, I have to say, seems like a reasonable idea… and depending on what topics they cover, perhaps even okay for a news channel. If nothing else there’s a ready blogosphere audience who’ll be interested to have their favorite blog on teevee.
Of course Fox has to screw it up by ridiculously skewing the balance (Miss Internment, balanced out by someone who doesn’t even blog as far as I know), but the basis of the show seems okay. Personally, would vote to have Atrios as the guest host, but as the kind of guy who will rip the right to shreds, can’t see Fox extending the invitation.
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:26 pmA rose by any other name is still a rose, and so is a Malkin.
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:26 pmThis jap is getting a TV show?? C’mon. She waas the one who said it was okay to imprison japanese during WWII right??
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:26 pm#11 Tom
Actually, I think Bush will be hosting more of a kids show, you know, “Story Time with Bush”, and for his first show he can do a dramatic reading of My Pet Goat.
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:26 pmCould be worse, they could have Olbermann’s ratings.
Comment by Patrick1
Some of us prefer substance over style.
Credibility v. popularity.
I’ll choose credibility evertime.
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:29 pmwhy is a “news” network attemptign to compete with comedy central? Its amazing how threatened they are
haha Stewart/ Colbert ‘08
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:31 pmI believe Olberman’s ratings have been going consistently up. Something like a 50% rise over the last year. During that time, I think Fox’s ratings have fallen by 40 to 60%. Olberman has obviously touched a nerve and people are growing weary of Fox’s b.S.
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:32 pmIt’s the trendline that’s important Patty – If you’re not familiar with graphs. Fox’s line is pointing down and toward the bottom-right corner of the graph, and in graphspeak, that’s “bad”. Olberman’s line, on the other hand, is pointing up, toward the Upper-right corner of the graph, and that means “good”.
Next time, we’ll discuss the negative axes, in our continuing examination of “How the Cartesian Coordinate System Works”
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:33 pmFOX hates Americans, because Malkin is a hatemonger and a fascist!
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:34 pmThe other Fox show began it’s first pilot episode with about 1 million viewers. By the 27th minute, it was down to about 330,000 viewers. Almost 700,000 viewers turned it off before it was over. This is not a good sign for the folks at Fox.
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:34 pmA rose by any other name is still a rose, and so is a Malkin.
Comment by Sachem515:
a scarecrow, ragged puppet, or grotesque effigy.
Says it all.
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:35 pmwhen did the right to freedom of speech get banned????
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:36 pmGIT ER DONE FOX !!!!
So it’s Hannity and Colmes, only in this format we have Malkin spewing venom and Powers biting her lip. Yeah, fair and balanced.
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:37 pmI don’t understand why people are upset about a political news satire being aired on a news channel. Haven’t political cartoons been in newspapers for quite awhile? Nobody talks about newspapers credibility being hurt from the cartoons. How is this different?
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:38 pmJO w.v.: “when did the right to freedom of speech get banned????
GIT ER DONE FOX !!!!”
Yes JO, this will be a perfect show for you! And don’t worry, there’s no talk of it being “banned.” Funny though. When Michael Moore’s “Farenheit 911″ was banned from broadcast television, I didn’t hear any of you arguing for freedom of speech.
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:43 pmIgnoring bad taste in ethnic descriptors, I think Ms. Malkin is actually phillipina.
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:44 pmStanman, I don’t sense that people are upset about this. What people are saying is that it’s pathetic that a news channel feels compelled to produce an answer to a Comedy Central Show.
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:45 pmWhat Ms. Malkin is is a fascist, plain and simple.
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:46 pmThis show is a travesty of a sham of a mockery.
It’s a trave-sham-ockery. (No making up words!)
I forced myself to watch the first installment, and it’s just sad. I mean REALLY sad. The laugh track they use, you can almost hear the tape recorder click on and off, it’s just so sad.
With the rise of the progressive shows ratings, like Keith Olberman’s, I’m quite sure that Fox will try to keep this abortion limping along in an attempt to put a crutch under their falling ratings.
Prepare yourself for at least a few more painfully un-funny eposides with no point. When they realize what a bomb it is, I’m sure the DHS will de-fuse it before it hurts anyone else.
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:47 pmI don’t see powers biting her lip for jesse’s puppet., she’s to ambitous. I watched her nearly make coulter cry when she was sitting in for that milquetoast colmes.
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:47 pmHave you ever noticed how Malkin looks like a stunned deer looking into FoxNews headlights?
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:47 pm#28 pluky
If that is true, then that may explain why she has no problem, in retrospect, with US policy to intern Japanese/Japanese-Americans during WWII.
BTW, anyone who denies that their was any racial element is full of crap, since Americans of German or Italian decent weren’t targeted to the same extent as Japanese-Americans.
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:47 pmIf Michelle Malkin were Jewish, I’m sure she’d be apologizing for the Jews taking up so much space in the ovens in the 40’s.
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:48 pmleave it to righties to pussy up once they’re invited to taste their own medicine. sheesh.
February 23rd, 2007 at 12:49 pmBluedog, but how is it any different than a newspaper running political sastire in the form of cartoons.
February 23rd, 2007 at 1:02 pmI hadn’t seen the show, but if it has you lefties up in arms it might be worth watching.
February 23rd, 2007 at 1:08 pmwho is this Michelle Malkin?
February 23rd, 2007 at 1:08 pmShe sounds like a castaway from a recent Survivor.
#39 DrxJ ~ Fox’s answer to Minnie Mouse, except she’s a rabid right wing rat…
February 23rd, 2007 at 1:18 pmAny show hosted by Michelle Malkin is, in itself, satire.
February 23rd, 2007 at 1:19 pmCongratulations to Michelle. She is educated, articulate, and will make a great addition to the Fox line-up.
For ratings on cable news channels, check this out.
February 23rd, 2007 at 1:26 pmStanman, I see your point. The only way it’s different is that in a newspaper, editorial cartoons are not usually printed in the news section. But, my sense is that this isn’t about that. Fox News is a news station. Comedy Central is a comedy station. That a nationally syndicated news network feels it must compete ideologically with a show from a comedy station is what I think the issue is here.
And, 20words, no need to get hysterical about this. I don’t see any lefties “up in arms” about this. We’re just commenting on how lame and pathetic it is. As I posted, close to 700,000 viewers who began watching the “Half-hour News Hour” turned it off by the 27th minute before the show was over. What that says to me is that the show is not funny to most people. Personally, I’m all for Murdock doing whatever he wants with his network. I hope he sinks millions of dollars into these two turds before he realizes that conservatives are just not that funny.
February 23rd, 2007 at 1:27 pmI thought Malkin was a member of the pajamas media empire. Why is she abandoning her pals in the new paradigm to host a mainstream media show?
February 23rd, 2007 at 1:29 pmBluedog-I agree that competing with a comedy station does not help their image. However, I can’t help but think about the newspapers. While they don’t run the cartoons on the front page-Fox News is not going to be mixing this with their newscasts. It will be seperated from the regular news. I also think that there is a sad trend that many people in this country get all their news from shows like the Daily Show and alike. Obviously this is all about ratings and trying to make money…which is in essense what all news stations and outlets try to do.
February 23rd, 2007 at 1:34 pmI hope he sinks millions of dollars into these two turds before he realizes that conservatives are just not that funny.
A bit of an over-generalization—don’t you think?
February 23rd, 2007 at 1:36 pmThat’s exactly what’s so weird about this.
I thought it was weird when SciFi started showing ECW rasslin’ but I guess you can make the stretch of “fantasy/ science fiction” to the larger than life rasslers, but fiction (in any form) is so wildly out of scope with a news channel format it’s really doing viewers a disservice. Not that the laugh track wouldn’t give it away, but some with a lesser clue might actually believe a skit a la Orsen Wells’ “War of the Worlds.”
I wonder why Fox doesn’t use its broadcast network or other cable channels, like FX, to do this venture?
Very strange…
February 23rd, 2007 at 1:36 pmThat may be true, but many times I find I can see more “truth” in a Daily Show skit than I can on anything on Fox News or even many broadcast news segments.
THAT’s what I find the MOST sad trend.
February 23rd, 2007 at 1:38 pmHow is this different? It’s not Faux News channel for nothing.
February 23rd, 2007 at 1:41 pmStanman: “I also think that there is a sad trend that many people in this country get all their news from shows like the Daily Show and alike.”
I think the sad part is that people feel so let down by their mainstream media that the satire on The Daily Show touches a nerve. People see and hear things on the Daily Show that the media doesn’t want to touch. And, I agree that my feelings on conservative comedy are a generalization, but really, how many funny conservatives can you name. It’s all subjective, but after Drew Carey and maybe Dennis Miller, who have you got? And, those guys just aren’t that funny anyway. I’ve pointed this out until I’m blue in the face: speaking TO power is often funny. Speaking FOR power is almost never funny. It’s often just more of that “kiss-up, kick-down” mean-spirited dismissal of dissent and disagreement. Hey, we’ll see. Maybe Malkin and the other show will be a huge success. My guess is no.
February 23rd, 2007 at 1:43 pmWhy, the comedy stylings of Larry the “Git R Done” Cable Guy, of course!
What the hell does “Git R Done” mean anyway?
February 23rd, 2007 at 1:54 pmMalkin’s programme will be titled “HEY JOE YOU GOT CHEWING GUM” or “ANYTHING YOU WANT–TWO BITS!” Perfect title for a two-bit rightwingnut whore who panders to the ultra-rightie repugnant-repubs with her vile infantile jingoistic demagogue chatter! Malkin will soon be flushed down the toilet of public opinion alongside fellow turds Rush Limburger, Ann Coulter-geist, Melanie Morgan, Victor Davis Hanson(a particularily NASTY piece of Cheney-kissing offal), Frank Gaffney, Bill O’LIElly, Matt Drudge, et cetera AD NAUSEUM! Roger Ailes, that tub of lard, is REALLY SCRAPING the bottom of the garbage barrel to put Malkin on!!!!!
February 23rd, 2007 at 2:00 pm“What the hell does “Git R Done†mean anyway?”
It’s a celebration of stupidity.
February 23rd, 2007 at 2:02 pmOnly half an hour for Michelle?
I can dig that. After all, how many slides of the Green Zone could she have brought back from her trip to Iraq?
February 23rd, 2007 at 2:22 pmThe strategy of the neo-cons is to compete in every media outlet. If the progressives/independents have a comedy show then so will they. Of course it’ll fall flat on its face because Nazis aren’t funny (excluding Hogan’s Heroes).
The neo-cons don’t want any progressive/independent media outlet to go unchallenged. That’s why you see so many trolls here. Its all part of the same philosophy.
February 23rd, 2007 at 2:35 pmAnd yet, Larry, the “challenges” are always so damn weak. It’s almost as if they don’t really have a philosophy except any idea which enhances corporate power.
February 23rd, 2007 at 2:40 pmOy!
It is Friday dork.
Do you just post crap with out reading the very short paragrph on the topic?
February 23rd, 2007 at 3:00 pm“You know . . . shows like “Chatting with Cheneyâ€, “Ranting with Rice†and “Babbling with Bu$hâ€. That’ll be a real ratings bonanza for ‘em!
Comment by Tom — February 23, 2007 @ 12:23 pm”
Or, “cheating with the Clintons” or “drinking with the Kennedys” or “lying with the Kerrys”
February 23rd, 2007 at 3:05 pmWhen Michael Moore’s “Farenheit 911″ was banned from broadcast television,[...]
Comment by Bluedog49 — February 23, 2007 @ 12:43 pm
Was it banned or just not picked up from any of the networks?
I am just curious.
February 23rd, 2007 at 3:06 pm“Should be an outstanding program, Malkin is great.
Comment by Patrick1 — February 23, 2007 @ 12:10 pm”
Yes she is!
February 23rd, 2007 at 3:06 pmKirsten Powers is to progressism as Alan Colmes is to professional bodybuilding.’
February 23rd, 2007 at 3:10 pm“Perfect title for a two-bit rightwingnut whore who panders to the ultra-rightie repugnant-repubs with her vile infantile jingoistic demagogue chatter!
Comment by Raymond Funamoto — February 23, 2007 @ 2:00 pm”
Care to provide us with an example of her chatter?
February 23rd, 2007 at 3:11 pmHmmmm,
February 23rd, 2007 at 3:12 pmRush was dropped in Fargo a month ago.
Fox News is being dropped March 1st.
ND is a red state.
Fargo is very conservative.
What to make of all this?
Rush & Fox are both on the downslope of popularity. Another ripple effect of the ‘06 election. People can only stand loud, obnoxious behavior for so long.
As I told my wife 6 years ago; be patient, give the Rightards enough rope and they’ll hang themselves.
Anyone good at tying slip knots?
Do you just post crap with out reading the very short paragrph on the topic?
Comment by Spudge_Boy — February 23, 2007 @ 3:00 pm
Ding Ding Ding Ding Ding!!!
We’ve got our winner of the most accurate summarization of 20wordsorless/michael/patrick1/LHT’s posts!!!
Don Pardo, tell him what’s his won!
“A year’s supply of Turtle Wax!”
February 23rd, 2007 at 3:12 pmI’ll probably watch the show. Put Michelle in a bikini and I’ll definitely watch the show.
February 23rd, 2007 at 3:13 pmWas it banned or just not picked up from any of the networks?
February 23rd, 2007 at 3:16 pmI am just curious.
Comment by hacker bob — February 23, 2007 @ 3:06 pm
No you’re not! You’re being a smart ass. (Not that there’s anything wrong with being a smart ass!)
:-)
Care to provide us with an example of her chatter?
February 23rd, 2007 at 3:19 pmComment by michael — February 23, 2007 @ 3:11 pm
Care to provide us proof you actually watched a show prior to it airing?
Care to provide us proof you actually watched a show prior to it airing?
Comment by DRxJ — February 23, 2007 @ 3:19 pm
What kind of question is that?
February 23rd, 2007 at 3:24 pm#56 BlueDog
Yes the challenges here are weak (pathetic). But they serve their purpose. The trolls effectively tie the posters in hours-long arguments. As a result the posters aren’t spending their time writing to newspapers, tv stations or protesting in the street. The trolls act like quicksand. They sap your energy and waste your time. That they don’t win the debate is largely irrelevant.
February 23rd, 2007 at 3:25 pmNo you’re not! You’re being a smart ass. (Not that there’s anything wrong with being a smart ass!)
:-)
Comment by DRxJ — February 23, 2007 @ 3:16 pm
Seriously, I am googling it now. I honestly do not know if it was banned or just not picked up.
If it was banned, I would like to see a justification for banning it. If it was not picked up by one of the networks then, oh well.
February 23rd, 2007 at 3:27 pmIf it was not picked up by one of the networks then, oh well.
February 23rd, 2007 at 3:31 pmComment by hacker bob — February 23, 2007 @ 3:27 pm
If I recall, it was dropped by ABC due to political pressure.
Sorry, I thought you were being a smart ass (I woulda done the same thing!!!)
Yes the challenges here are weak (pathetic).
Comment by Larry from C — February 23, 2007 @ 3:25 pm
Which ones? Quote a few?
February 23rd, 2007 at 3:33 pmComment by DRxJ — February 23, 2007 @ 3:31 pm
No harm, I can see how that could look like a smart ass remark.
Thanks for the info about ABC. I haven’t been able to find a “smoking gun” yet saying it was banned in the US. There are articles about theater chains in the US “banning” it, but it is more of a case of refusing to show it.
February 23rd, 2007 at 3:38 pm(I woulda done the same thing!!!)
February 23rd, 2007 at 3:40 pmComment by DRxJ — February 23, 2007 @ 3:31 pm
Damn, I keep getting interrupted.
Let me clarify.
I woulda done the same thing means I woulda been (still am) a smart ass.
I woulda NOT caved in to political pressure and dropped F9/11!
“If I recall, it was dropped by ABC due to political pressure”
Really? Care to provide some proof of that?
February 23rd, 2007 at 3:47 pmShe makes Ann Coulter seem like a teddy bear of kindness.
Seriously.
February 23rd, 2007 at 3:54 pmComment by DRxJ — February 23, 2007 @ 3:40 pm
I think it was prett clear what you meant.
I wouldn’t have caved to the politics either. I can not stand Michael Moore, but I HATE censorship.
February 23rd, 2007 at 3:55 pmFox is the joke!
February 23rd, 2007 at 3:56 pmmichael:
February 23rd, 2007 at 3:56 pmIt is particularly odd when it turns out to be the very same corporation that decided to forgo hundreds of millions of dollars when it refused to distribute another movie, Fahrenheit 9-11, that took a differing view of this same historical event because, as one of its executives explained, “it’s not in the interest of any major corporation to be dragged into a highly charged partisan political battle.”
ABC’s parent company, Disney, refused to distribute said movie.
Sorry my words weren’t more clear
Maybe we could get the Chinese to do target practice on Fox’s satellite.
February 23rd, 2007 at 4:11 pmThey should put “Randi Rhodes” from Air America next to Malkin not Kristen Powers. Kristin is to soft, Malkin will eat her alive and Kristen will just take it. I saw these two on a split screen with O’Reilly and Malkin ate Kristin’s lunch. More of the same bullshit from Fox and company.
February 23rd, 2007 at 4:24 pmmichael? still here?
February 23rd, 2007 at 4:32 pmIf so, you’re welcome for the proof your requested.
“michael? still here?
If so, you’re welcome for the proof your requested.
Comment by DRxJ — February 23, 2007 @ 4:32 pm”
I thought you were referring to Fox News?
February 23rd, 2007 at 4:45 pm“If I recall, it was dropped by ABC due to political pressureâ€
February 23rd, 2007 at 4:53 pmReally? Care to provide some proof of that?
Comment by michael — February 23, 2007 @ 3:47 pm
answered by:
ABC’s parent company, Disney, refused to distribute said movie.
Comment by DRxJ — February 23, 2007 @ 3:56 pm
To which you respond:
I thought you were referring to Fox News?
Comment by michael — February 23, 2007 @ 4:45 pm
To which I say:
Huh????????????
Michael Moore had the biggest grossing documentary in history, a best seller on the top ten list for months and an oscar for his previous movie. Larry frickin King wouldn’t even have him on his show. He was blacked out on network and cable news channels and everybody knows it. Give us a break with your “care to provide some proof for that” bull.
And, Bob, I’m not surprised that you don’t like him, but what exactly has he been wrong about? Half the crowd was booing him when he accepted his oscar because he asserted that the reasons we invaded Iraq were “fiction.” He was right.
February 23rd, 2007 at 5:01 pmMalkin’s blog is called “Hot Air“. Her show is to be called “Out There“. Me thinks she’s trying to tell us something! :)
February 23rd, 2007 at 5:02 pmhttp://newsmine.org/
News and Document archive source for uncovering and exposing
February 23rd, 2007 at 5:38 pmwith over 10,000 articles and documents
“he asserted that the reasons we invaded Iraq were “fiction.†He was right.
Comment by Bluedog49 — February 23, 2007 @ 5:01 pm”
He was? Explain?
February 23rd, 2007 at 5:42 pmMichael have you been in suspended animation for a few years? There were no WMD’s and no connections to al Qaeda or the 9-11 attack. There were no drones capable of delivering WMD’s to the east coast. There were no plans to attack the U.S. There was no support of al Qaeda training camps and no money for them. There was no real threat to neighbors, let alone the territorial U.S. And, as history has shown us, the Iraqi people were not and are not clamoring for a western-style democracy. But, you know this already. Your goal is to be obtuse and annoying. You’ve accomplished your goal.
February 23rd, 2007 at 5:51 pmThe neo-cons don’t want any progressive/independent media outlet to go unchallenged. That’s why you see so many trolls here. Its all part of the same philosophy.
I assume that you are fan of monpolies?
February 23rd, 2007 at 5:51 pm“Michael have you been in suspended animation for a few years? There were no WMD’s”
We are not there because of WMD’s! We are there because the barbaric muslim animals who occupy that part of the world were responsible for the deaths of over 6,000 Americans over the last 30 years. We should have invaded 30 years ago!
February 23rd, 2007 at 6:14 pmQuick, get me a barf bag, I’m gonna loose my din…..ooops, too late.
February 23rd, 2007 at 6:22 pmnice michael – you just pop by after spending your day at Stormfront??
February 23rd, 2007 at 6:25 pmmichael: “We are not there because of WMD’s! We are there because the barbaric muslim animals who occupy that part of the world were responsible for the deaths of over 6,000 Americans over the last 30 years.”
That’s not the reason Bush or Cheney gave to the American people and their representatives in congress. Are you admitting that Bush lied to start the war? That’s very big of you.
February 23rd, 2007 at 6:26 pmTwo things quickly come to mind. How many of those 6,000 Americans were killed in America? That number is a lot less than the total Americans who are killed BY Americans with firearms each year. So, I’m just saying you seem a bit hysterical.
February 23rd, 2007 at 6:29 pmI apologize to everyone for my last post. That was just callous. I guess sometimes these Bush cultists bring out the worst in me.
February 23rd, 2007 at 6:36 pmMichael Moore had the biggest grossing documentary in history, a best seller on the top ten list for months and an oscar for his previous movie. Larry frickin King wouldn’t even have him on his show. He was blacked out on network and cable news channels and everybody knows it. Give us a break with your “care to provide some proof for that†bull.
And no one wanted to pick up the fireball. That is not BANNING it. That is CHOOSING not to show it. don’t the networks have that right? Does Larry King (who I can not stand) not have the right to determine what guests he has? See, it is a business decision. To imply it was banned would imply that the government had passed a law saying it couldn’t be shown in public.
But since you can not even remotely PROVE it, you go into hysterics.
And, Bob, I’m not surprised that you don’t like him, but what exactly has he been wrong about? Half the crowd was booing him when he accepted his oscar because he asserted that the reasons we invaded Iraq were “fiction.†He was right.
Comment by Bluedog49 — February 23, 2007 @ 5:01 pm
I do not like his style or his tactics. I do not like how he misrepresents his intentions. Do I have the right not to like him?
February 23rd, 2007 at 8:20 pmPut Michelle in a bikini and I’ll definitely watch the show.
Comment by paul #65
TRANSLATION:
Michelle’s just another bi*ch to us racist al Crackkker conned’sel-servative misogynists…
hehehehehe!!!!
Funny thing is…
…THIS time I agree with putrid paul…
…but I’d never watch that propaganda ploy…
February 24th, 2007 at 1:01 amKirsten Powers is exactly the type of loser Dem that Fox loves..the kind that agrees with the Republicans that the Dems are bad, bad, bad over every false outrage the GOP wingnuts scream about..female Colmes. Fox sucks.
Malkin is so shrill I don’t know how even right wingers would want to watch her. The eye rolling, the sarcastic snottiness dripping with hatred…she’s absolutely vile.
February 24th, 2007 at 4:39 amWell, i am shocked to see the tolerant left hasn’t hurled one racial insult at malkin here. good job kids. you really may be progressing afterall.
February 24th, 2007 at 11:55 pm