Comments on: Michelle Malkin to co-host new Fox show. http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/ Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:03:58 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: ballbuster http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/comment-page-2/#comment-1900965 ballbuster Sun, 25 Feb 2007 04:55:00 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/#comment-1900965 Well, i am shocked to see the tolerant left hasn't hurled one racial insult at malkin here. good job kids. you really may be progressing afterall. Well, i am shocked to see the tolerant left hasn’t hurled one racial insult at malkin here. good job kids. you really may be progressing afterall.

]]> By: jen http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/comment-page-2/#comment-1884245 jen Sat, 24 Feb 2007 09:39:02 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/#comment-1884245 Kirsten Powers is exactly the type of loser Dem that Fox loves..the kind that agrees with the Republicans that the Dems are bad, bad, bad over every false outrage the GOP wingnuts scream about..female Colmes. Fox sucks. Malkin is so shrill I don't know how even right wingers would want to watch her. The eye rolling, the sarcastic snottiness dripping with hatred...she's absolutely vile. Kirsten Powers is exactly the type of loser Dem that Fox loves..the kind that agrees with the Republicans that the Dems are bad, bad, bad over every false outrage the GOP wingnuts scream about..female Colmes. Fox sucks.

Malkin is so shrill I don’t know how even right wingers would want to watch her. The eye rolling, the sarcastic snottiness dripping with hatred…she’s absolutely vile.

]]> By: big papa http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/comment-page-2/#comment-1881666 big papa Sat, 24 Feb 2007 06:01:17 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/#comment-1881666 <em>Put Michelle in a bikini and I’ll definitely watch the show.</em> Comment by paul #65 <strong>TRANSLATION:</strong> <em>Michelle's just another bi*ch to us racist al Crackkker conned'sel-servative misogynists...</em> <em>hehehehehe!!!!</em> <strong>Funny thing is... ...THIS time I agree with putrid paul... ...but I'd never watch that propaganda ploy...</strong> Put Michelle in a bikini and I’ll definitely watch the show.

Comment by paul #65

TRANSLATION:

Michelle’s just another bi*ch to us racist al Crackkker conned’sel-servative misogynists…

hehehehehe!!!!

Funny thing is…

…THIS time I agree with putrid paul…

…but I’d never watch that propaganda ploy…

]]> By: hacker bob http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/comment-page-2/#comment-1879576 hacker bob Sat, 24 Feb 2007 01:20:56 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/#comment-1879576 <em>Michael Moore had the biggest grossing documentary in history, a best seller on the top ten list for months and an oscar for his previous movie. Larry frickin King wouldn’t even have him on his show. He was blacked out on network and cable news channels and everybody knows it. Give us a break with your “care to provide some proof for that” bull.</em> And no one wanted to pick up the fireball. That is not BANNING it. That is CHOOSING not to show it. don't the networks have that right? Does Larry King (who I can not stand) not have the right to determine what guests he has? See, it is a business decision. To imply it was banned would imply that the government had passed a law saying it couldn't be shown in public. But since you can not even remotely PROVE it, you go into hysterics. <em>And, Bob, I’m not surprised that you don’t like him, but what exactly has he been wrong about? Half the crowd was booing him when he accepted his oscar because he asserted that the reasons we invaded Iraq were “fiction.” He was right. Comment by Bluedog49 — February 23, 2007 @ 5:01 pm</em> I do not like his style or his tactics. I do not like how he misrepresents his intentions. Do I have the right not to like him? Michael Moore had the biggest grossing documentary in history, a best seller on the top ten list for months and an oscar for his previous movie. Larry frickin King wouldn’t even have him on his show. He was blacked out on network and cable news channels and everybody knows it. Give us a break with your “care to provide some proof for that” bull.

And no one wanted to pick up the fireball. That is not BANNING it. That is CHOOSING not to show it. don’t the networks have that right? Does Larry King (who I can not stand) not have the right to determine what guests he has? See, it is a business decision. To imply it was banned would imply that the government had passed a law saying it couldn’t be shown in public.

But since you can not even remotely PROVE it, you go into hysterics.

And, Bob, I’m not surprised that you don’t like him, but what exactly has he been wrong about? Half the crowd was booing him when he accepted his oscar because he asserted that the reasons we invaded Iraq were “fiction.” He was right.

Comment by Bluedog49 — February 23, 2007 @ 5:01 pm

I do not like his style or his tactics. I do not like how he misrepresents his intentions. Do I have the right not to like him?

]]> By: Bluedog49 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/comment-page-2/#comment-1878048 Bluedog49 Fri, 23 Feb 2007 23:36:19 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/#comment-1878048 I apologize to everyone for my last post. That was just callous. I guess sometimes these Bush cultists bring out the worst in me. I apologize to everyone for my last post. That was just callous. I guess sometimes these Bush cultists bring out the worst in me.

]]> By: Bluedog49 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/comment-page-2/#comment-1878009 Bluedog49 Fri, 23 Feb 2007 23:29:34 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/#comment-1878009 Two things quickly come to mind. How many of those 6,000 Americans were killed in America? That number is a lot less than the total Americans who are killed BY Americans with firearms each year. So, I'm just saying you seem a bit hysterical. Two things quickly come to mind. How many of those 6,000 Americans were killed in America? That number is a lot less than the total Americans who are killed BY Americans with firearms each year. So, I’m just saying you seem a bit hysterical.

]]> By: Bluedog49 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/comment-page-2/#comment-1877988 Bluedog49 Fri, 23 Feb 2007 23:26:32 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/#comment-1877988 michael: "We are not there because of WMD’s! We are there because the barbaric muslim animals who occupy that part of the world were responsible for the deaths of over 6,000 Americans over the last 30 years." That's not the reason Bush or Cheney gave to the American people and their representatives in congress. Are you admitting that Bush lied to start the war? That's very big of you. michael: “We are not there because of WMD’s! We are there because the barbaric muslim animals who occupy that part of the world were responsible for the deaths of over 6,000 Americans over the last 30 years.”

That’s not the reason Bush or Cheney gave to the American people and their representatives in congress. Are you admitting that Bush lied to start the war? That’s very big of you.

]]> By: tom baker http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/comment-page-2/#comment-1877980 tom baker Fri, 23 Feb 2007 23:25:43 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/#comment-1877980 nice michael - you just pop by after spending your day at Stormfront?? nice michael – you just pop by after spending your day at Stormfront??

]]> By: Uncle Ho http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/comment-page-2/#comment-1877955 Uncle Ho Fri, 23 Feb 2007 23:22:03 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/#comment-1877955 Quick, get me a barf bag, I'm gonna loose my din.....ooops, too late. Quick, get me a barf bag, I’m gonna loose my din…..ooops, too late.

]]> By: michael http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/comment-page-2/#comment-1877898 michael Fri, 23 Feb 2007 23:14:02 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/#comment-1877898 "Michael have you been in suspended animation for a few years? There were no WMD’s" We are not there because of WMD's! We are there because the barbaric muslim animals who occupy that part of the world were responsible for the deaths of over 6,000 Americans over the last 30 years. We should have invaded 30 years ago! “Michael have you been in suspended animation for a few years? There were no WMD’s”

We are not there because of WMD’s! We are there because the barbaric muslim animals who occupy that part of the world were responsible for the deaths of over 6,000 Americans over the last 30 years. We should have invaded 30 years ago!

]]> By: stanman http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/comment-page-2/#comment-1877753 stanman Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:51:40 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/#comment-1877753 <em>The neo-cons don’t want any progressive/independent media outlet to go unchallenged. That’s why you see so many trolls here. Its all part of the same philosophy.</em> I assume that you are fan of monpolies? The neo-cons don’t want any progressive/independent media outlet to go unchallenged. That’s why you see so many trolls here. Its all part of the same philosophy.

I assume that you are fan of monpolies?

]]> By: Bluedog49 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/comment-page-2/#comment-1877750 Bluedog49 Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:51:05 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/#comment-1877750 Michael have you been in suspended animation for a few years? There were no WMD's and no connections to al Qaeda or the 9-11 attack. There were no drones capable of delivering WMD's to the east coast. There were no plans to attack the U.S. There was no support of al Qaeda training camps and no money for them. There was no real threat to neighbors, let alone the territorial U.S. And, as history has shown us, the Iraqi people were not and are not clamoring for a western-style democracy. But, you know this already. Your goal is to be obtuse and annoying. You've accomplished your goal. Michael have you been in suspended animation for a few years? There were no WMD’s and no connections to al Qaeda or the 9-11 attack. There were no drones capable of delivering WMD’s to the east coast. There were no plans to attack the U.S. There was no support of al Qaeda training camps and no money for them. There was no real threat to neighbors, let alone the territorial U.S. And, as history has shown us, the Iraqi people were not and are not clamoring for a western-style democracy. But, you know this already. Your goal is to be obtuse and annoying. You’ve accomplished your goal.

]]> By: michael http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/comment-page-2/#comment-1877688 michael Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:42:12 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/#comment-1877688 "he asserted that the reasons we invaded Iraq were “fiction.” He was right. Comment by Bluedog49 — February 23, 2007 @ 5:01 pm" He was? Explain? “he asserted that the reasons we invaded Iraq were “fiction.” He was right.

Comment by Bluedog49 — February 23, 2007 @ 5:01 pm”

He was? Explain?

]]> By: rachel http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/comment-page-2/#comment-1877662 rachel Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:38:09 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/#comment-1877662 http://newsmine.org/ News and Document archive source for uncovering and exposing with over 10,000 articles and documents http://newsmine.org/

News and Document archive source for uncovering and exposing
with over 10,000 articles and documents

]]> By: Mugsy http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/comment-page-2/#comment-1877432 Mugsy Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:02:40 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/#comment-1877432 Malkin's blog is called "<strong>Hot Air</strong>". Her show is to be called "<strong>Out There</strong>". <em>Me thinks she's trying to tell us something!</em> :) Malkin’s blog is called “Hot Air“. Her show is to be called “Out There“. Me thinks she’s trying to tell us something! :)

]]> By: Bluedog49 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/comment-page-2/#comment-1877419 Bluedog49 Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:01:14 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/#comment-1877419 Michael Moore had the biggest grossing documentary in history, a best seller on the top ten list for months and an oscar for his previous movie. Larry frickin King wouldn't even have him on his show. He was blacked out on network and cable news channels and everybody knows it. Give us a break with your "care to provide some proof for that" bull. And, Bob, I'm not surprised that you don't like him, but what exactly has he been wrong about? Half the crowd was booing him when he accepted his oscar because he asserted that the reasons we invaded Iraq were "fiction." He was right. Michael Moore had the biggest grossing documentary in history, a best seller on the top ten list for months and an oscar for his previous movie. Larry frickin King wouldn’t even have him on his show. He was blacked out on network and cable news channels and everybody knows it. Give us a break with your “care to provide some proof for that” bull.

And, Bob, I’m not surprised that you don’t like him, but what exactly has he been wrong about? Half the crowd was booing him when he accepted his oscar because he asserted that the reasons we invaded Iraq were “fiction.” He was right.

]]> By: DRxJ http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/comment-page-2/#comment-1877355 DRxJ Fri, 23 Feb 2007 21:53:59 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/#comment-1877355 <em>“If I recall, it was dropped by <strong>ABC </strong>due to political pressure” Really? Care to provide some proof of that? Comment by michael — February 23, 2007 @ 3:47 pm</em> answered by: <em><strong>ABC’</strong>s parent company, Disney, refused to distribute said movie. Comment by DRxJ — February 23, 2007 @ 3:56 pm</em> To which you respond: <em>I thought you were referring to <strong>Fox News</strong>? Comment by michael — February 23, 2007 @ 4:45 pm</em> To which I say: Huh???????????? “If I recall, it was dropped by ABC due to political pressure”
Really? Care to provide some proof of that?
Comment by michael — February 23, 2007 @ 3:47 pm
answered by:
ABC’s parent company, Disney, refused to distribute said movie.
Comment by DRxJ — February 23, 2007 @ 3:56 pm
To which you respond:
I thought you were referring to Fox News?
Comment by michael — February 23, 2007 @ 4:45 pm
To which I say:
Huh????????????

]]> By: michael http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/comment-page-2/#comment-1877296 michael Fri, 23 Feb 2007 21:45:06 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/#comment-1877296 "michael? still here? If so, you’re welcome for the proof your requested. Comment by DRxJ — February 23, 2007 @ 4:32 pm" I thought you were referring to Fox News? “michael? still here?
If so, you’re welcome for the proof your requested.

Comment by DRxJ — February 23, 2007 @ 4:32 pm”

I thought you were referring to Fox News?

]]> By: DRxJ http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/comment-page-2/#comment-1877200 DRxJ Fri, 23 Feb 2007 21:32:07 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/#comment-1877200 michael? still here? If so, you're welcome for the proof your requested. michael? still here?
If so, you’re welcome for the proof your requested.

]]> By: marcus robinson http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/comment-page-2/#comment-1877138 marcus robinson Fri, 23 Feb 2007 21:24:35 +0000 http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/23/michelle-malkin-to-co-host-new-fox-show/#comment-1877138 They should put "Randi Rhodes" from Air America next to Malkin not Kristen Powers. Kristin is to soft, Malkin will eat her alive and Kristen will just take it. I saw these two on a split screen with O'Reilly and Malkin ate Kristin's lunch. More of the same bullshit from Fox and company. They should put “Randi Rhodes” from Air America next to Malkin not Kristen Powers. Kristin is to soft, Malkin will eat her alive and Kristen will just take it. I saw these two on a split screen with O’Reilly and Malkin ate Kristin’s lunch. More of the same bullshit from Fox and company.

]]>