Bush nominates Swift Boat funder as ambassador.
President Bush has nominated Sam Fox, a major right-wing donor who gave $50,000 to the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, to be ambassador to Belgium. Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) “grilled” Fox today during his confirmation hearing:
“Might I ask you what your opinion is with respect to the state of American politics as regards the politics of personal destruction?” Kerry asked near the end of Fox’s hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Fox, one of the nation’s most generous contributors to Republican candidates and causes, said he is concerned that politics “has become mean and destructive.”
Fox said he didn’t recall who asked him to give to Swift Boat Veterans and said both sides of the political debate contribute to groups known as 527s.
But Kerry said the incident raised questions about Fox’s fitness to serve as an ambassador. …
It is not clear whether Kerry’s concerns will pose an obstacle to Fox’s nomination.
Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date
147 Responses to “Bush nominates Swift Boat funder as ambassador.”
Topic Cloud
This must be what Bush was talking about when he said he wanted to put aside partisan politics.
February 27th, 2007 at 9:37 pmtest
February 27th, 2007 at 9:37 pmmore neocon bull
February 27th, 2007 at 9:39 pmFox, one of the nation’s most generous contributors to Republican candidates and causes, said he is concerned that politics “has become mean and destructive.â€
Fox being one of the biggest facilitators of the ugliness, can’t see the forest for the trees.
Why does GWB hate Belgium?
February 27th, 2007 at 9:41 pmtest
Comment by Admin
A+
February 27th, 2007 at 9:41 pmBut he’s a uniter, not a divider…..
/sarcasm off
February 27th, 2007 at 9:43 pmSo why didn’t Kerry banjo this tosser?
February 27th, 2007 at 9:44 pmAll Kerry has to do is put a hold on the nomination and it’s stopped. The holds are secret
February 27th, 2007 at 9:46 pm#8 Are they? I have no clue how those work but I have heard names put to holds before. Leaks?
February 27th, 2007 at 9:57 pmSam Fox (porn star).
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samantha_Fox
Who’d thunk Sam was a porno star.
Heckuva Job VV!
test
Comment by Admin
I hate tests. =)
February 27th, 2007 at 9:57 pmWhy is it “not clear whether Kerry’s concerns will pose an obstacle to Fox’s nomination?” Why is ANY Democrat even thinking of letting this man be our ambassador?? Have the Democrats no guts at all? I am beginning to think the Democrats are in collusion with the Republicans, and we have only an illusion of democracy–after all, Democrats won’t even protect our young troops by pushing for adequate training and rest. Maybe Bush/Cheney, the Republicans, and the Democrats are all in bed together, and we’ll have endless wars and an endless loop of election cycles.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:00 pmDear Sen.Kerry, you need to put a hold on this guy, not in the literal sence, the kind that make’s his nomination go away till 2009….Time to stop the madness and all that support it… Blessings
February 27th, 2007 at 10:01 pmHave the Democrats no guts at all?
No!
This has been simple answers to simple questions.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:03 pmYou mean to tell me you can get a cushy job in mean destructive politics by just giving 50,000 to a smear campaign?
Got morals?
I bet this is home the collapse of the Roman empire began.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:04 pmhome=how
=)
February 27th, 2007 at 10:04 pm#11 midwestblue
Not to be insulting to Belgium at all, but it is only Belgium, what harm could he do? If he tries in crap, I doubt the people of Belgium would stand for it.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:04 pmEurope: Dutch Mayor to Move Coffee Shops to Belgian Border 6/2/06 http://stopthedrugwar.org/ chronicle/ 438/ maastricht.shtml
Maybe Mr Fox will find his way to the coffee shops.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:09 pm#16 Well, the righties had a fit over the gay ambassador to Luxembourg. Tit for tat.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:12 pm“Fox being one of the biggest facilitators of the ugliness, can’t see the forest for the trees.
Comment by Zooey — February 27, 2007 @ 9:41 pm”
And you can? Please explain.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:14 pm“So why didn’t Kerry banjo this tosser?
Comment by TerrytheTurtle — February 27, 2007 @ 9:44 pm”
Because kerry has too much to hide.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:15 pm#18 JPark
What? They went nuts over a gay ambassador for a city state, whose only importance is a tourist destination? Talk about off ones rocker, I take back my previous statement, block him.
And if he is blocked, I would like to see them try and label the dems as obstructionist. I might get a good chuckle out of it.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:17 pm“Why is ANY Democrat even thinking of letting this man be our ambassador??
Comment by midwestblue — February 27, 2007 @ 10:00 pm”
Did you think Bush was going to nominate a democrat contributor?
February 27th, 2007 at 10:18 pm“Dear Sen.Kerry, you need to put a hold on this guy, not in the literal sence, the kind that make’s his nomination go away till 2009….Time to stop the madness and all that support it… Blessings
Comment by Sharon — February 27, 2007 @ 10:01 pm”
He won’t! It will just stir up all the kerry military lies again!
February 27th, 2007 at 10:20 pmDid you think Bush was going to nominate a democrat contributor? Comment by michael — February 27, 2007 @ 10:18 pm
Why not? Not everyone is a partisan hack desk hugging bed wetter, like you and bush.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:20 pmBecause kerry has too much to hide.
Comment by michael — February 27, 2007 @ 10:15 pm
Prove your ridiculous charge. Liar.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:21 pm“Have the Democrats no guts at all?
No!
This has been simple answers to simple questions.
Comment by klyde — February 27, 2007 @ 10:03 pm”
They never had any guts!
February 27th, 2007 at 10:21 pmAnd you can? Please explain.
Comment by michael — February 27, 2007 @ 10:14 pm
And you can’t? Please explain.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:21 pmDebate challenge ignored by michael on Monday:
Still waiting for you and Rachel to accept my challenge? If you have the nerve. Any topic!
Comment by michael
Ok, michael. The topic of today’s debate is “michael is a complete and utter moron.†Your task in this debate is to argue in favor of that position.
You start.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:21 pmI went to Johnkerry.com to leave a message opposing fox. But the web site has no way to leave a message. Go figure.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:21 pmHe won’t! It will just stir up all the kerry military lies again!
Comment by michael — February 27, 2007 @ 10:20 pm
Here you right wing nutlickers go again. Prove it, chickenhawk.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:22 pm“You mean to tell me you can get a cushy job in mean destructive politics by just giving 50,000 to a smear campaign?
Got morals?
I bet this is home the collapse of the Roman empire began.
Comment by Crazy Eddie — February 27, 2007 @ 10:04 pm”
What smear campaign are you referring to?
February 27th, 2007 at 10:22 pmPeople should be appointed by ability and experience (in other words, merit), not by loyalty or party affiliation.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:23 pmWhat smear campaign are you referring to?
Comment by michael — February 27, 2007 @ 10:22 pm
Yours, nutlicker.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:23 pmPeople should be appointed by ability and experience (in other words, merit), not by loyalty or party affiliation.
Comment by AshenShard — February 27, 2007 @ 10:23 pm
If CONs played by those rules, Bush and michael would all be scrubbing toilets, instead of draft dodging and avoiding their responsibilities like they both did.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:25 pm“Prove your ridiculous charge. Liar.
Comment by ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus — February 27, 2007 @ 10:21 pm”
Sure! Explain to us all why it took kerry over 5 years to get an Honorable Discharge when the rest of us got ours 1 year after our separation from inactive duty?
February 27th, 2007 at 10:25 pmCrazy Eddie - Just to set the record straight. I do not condone this appointment, but honesty is is a liberal trait.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:25 pm“People should be appointed by ability and experience (in other words, merit), not by loyalty or party affiliation.
Comment by AshenShard — February 27, 2007 @ 10:23 pm”
Oh and I’m sure that’s what Clinton did?
February 27th, 2007 at 10:26 pmAre they? I have no clue how those work but I have heard names put to holds before. Leaks?
It’s secret when the senator wants it to be. And sometimes the names leak but there is never any official confirmation without the senators approval.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:27 pmAnd you can? Please explain.
Comment by michael
Why?
February 27th, 2007 at 10:28 pm“Crazy Eddie - Just to set the record straight. I do not condone this appointment.
Comment by WaltTheMan — February 27, 2007 @ 10:25 pm”
Why Walt?
February 27th, 2007 at 10:28 pm#35 - michael,
February 27th, 2007 at 10:29 pmIn the case of neocons, that’s anoher matter.
“Why?
Comment by Crazy Eddie — February 27, 2007 @ 10:28 pm”
Testing your intelligence!
February 27th, 2007 at 10:29 pmSure! Explain to us all why it took kerry over 5 years to get an Honorable Discharge when the rest of us got ours 1 year after our separation from inactive duty?
Comment by michael
You said Kerry has something to hide. Your question hasn’t proven anything liar!
February 27th, 2007 at 10:29 pmOh and I’m sure that’s what Clinton did?
Comment by michael — February 27, 2007 @ 10:26 pm
Why are you sure of anything, when you don’t know anything, stupid old c*nt?
February 27th, 2007 at 10:30 pmNote to progressives, the children are home from school, their home work, dinner and chores are done….Their mom’s and dad’s are watching smack down wrestling and sucking on the brewskies while the little boy’s play on their computer’s…Remember it is not our job to baby the little troll’s and by all mean’s do not feed…..You know the obesity rule….Blessings
February 27th, 2007 at 10:31 pmCrazy Eddie - Just to set the record straight. I do not condone this appointment, but honesty is is a liberal trait.
Comment by WaltTheMan
So is joking around =)
I do not condone this appointment either. Who wants an Ambassador porno star smoking pot on the Belgian border?
February 27th, 2007 at 10:32 pm#40 - michael,
February 27th, 2007 at 10:32 pmBecause this individual has as much tact as Dick Cheney.
Sure! Explain to us all why it took kerry over 5 years to get an Honorable Discharge when the rest of us got ours 1 year after our separation from inactive duty?
Comment by michael — February 27, 2007 @ 10:25 pm
Why is that relevant, prove, that it’s relevant or accurate, you st*pid old c*nt?
February 27th, 2007 at 10:32 pmTesting your intelligence!
Comment by michael — February 27, 2007 @ 10:29 pm
Why do you feel you’re up to the task?
February 27th, 2007 at 10:33 pmmichael,
You have the debate challenge you’ve so been looking forward to at #28. Chicken?
February 27th, 2007 at 10:34 pm“You said Kerry has something to hide. Your question hasn’t proven anything liar!
Comment by klyde — February 27, 2007 @ 10:29 pm”
And so I’ll ask you again, why did it take kerry 5 years to get his Honorable Discharge? And isn’t it strange that it only came after Carter granted amnesty to draft dodgers and those who received less than honorable discharges? Care to try and explain this? Calling me a liar doesn’t help your blind allegiance for this fraud!
February 27th, 2007 at 10:34 pmOh and I’m sure that’s what Clinton did?
I am not one for defending Clinton, he wasn’t my favorite, but cite something…anything. I can cite 50 partison hacks that Bush has appointed.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:35 pmSure! Explain to us all why it took kerry over 5 years to get an Honorable Discharge when the rest of us got ours 1 year after our separation from inactive duty?
Comment by michael
Kerry is not running for office Michael, if you want to argue over smear campaigns and the idiocy behind it might I suggest an AOL or MSN chat room?
I can talk much about Bushes little homebound champagne Guard squadron, but why? Kerry nor Bush, who BTW went to the same madrassa (school) and who were both members of the same collegiate society is pointless and neither are running for President.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:37 pm“#40 - michael,
Because this individual has as much tact as Dick Cheney.
Comment by WaltTheMan — February 27, 2007 @ 10:32 pm”
Walt, it’s very easy to hurl accusations at individuals without backing them up with something convincing. I know it’s a liberal tact but it doesn’t work with me. Want to try again?
February 27th, 2007 at 10:37 pm#51 Are you still being paid, swiftboater?
February 27th, 2007 at 10:37 pmTesting your intelligence!
Comment by michael
Why? What to you is thought? Is thought intelligence?
February 27th, 2007 at 10:40 pmWhy do you parrot old talking points? Why do project your thinking unto others? Do you have ESP?
“michael,
You have the debate challenge you’ve so been looking forward to at #28. Chicken?
Comment by Zooey — February 27, 2007 @ 10:34 pm”
It figures that you couldn’t pick a subject that was meaningful like minimum wage, or global warming, or Iran. You had to resort to something childish! I’m not at all surprised! Where’s rachel? Hiding under her bed?
February 27th, 2007 at 10:41 pmWalt, it’s very easy to hurl accusations at individuals without backing them up with something convincing. I know it’s a liberal tact but it doesn’t work with me. Want to try again?
Comment by michael — February 27, 2007 @ 10:37 pm
Says the diaper encrusted old c*nt named michael, just after he hurled accusations without backing them up. What a st*pid old c*nt.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:44 pm“Kerry is not running for office Michael, if you want to argue over smear campaigns and the idiocy behind it might I suggest an AOL or MSN chat room?
Comment by Crazy Eddie — February 27, 2007 @ 10:37 pm”
Have you chosen the screen name crazy for a reason? You might want to check the subject matter of this thread before you go any further?
February 27th, 2007 at 10:44 pmswiftboaters: lowest of the low, getting their quid pro quo from the executive Ho, paid in full for their dog and pony show
February 27th, 2007 at 10:44 pm#57 - Chickenshit michael
This is your own challenge, and I expect you to live up to it.
Still waiting for you and Rachel to accept my challenge? If you have the nerve. Any topic!
February 27th, 2007 at 10:44 pmComment by michael
And so I’ll ask you again, why did it take kerry 5 years to get his Honorable Discharge? And isn’t it strange that it only came after Carter granted amnesty to draft dodgers and those who received less than honorable discharges? Care to try and explain this? Calling me a liar doesn’t help your blind allegiance for this fraud!
Comment by michael — February 27, 2007 @ 10:34 pm
Maybe because he became an activist and listened to his conscience? A feature missing from your old toothless scull, c*nt.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:45 pmPlease michael, explain why bush didn’t serve? Stupid old hate filled c*nt.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:45 pmWalt, it’s very easy to hurl accusations at individuals without backing them up with something convincing. I know it’s a liberal tact but it doesn’t work with me. Want to try again?
Comment by michael
Why did you hurl accusations without backing them up?
February 27th, 2007 at 10:46 pmWhy are you convinced somone is telling the truth when they agree with your opinion, but not vis a vis? Why? I am not a liberal? Why do you think just because this website is progressive that it’s liberal? Why don’t they just call it liberal progress? What do you think a liberal is? A drug user like Rush? Poor? On Welfare? If the liberals are so poor howcome they are millionaire actors? Why do people like movies with liberals? Why does GOPr’s like 24 with that liberal actor? How do poor liberals on welfare afford huge media outlets? If the Brits are liberals, then isn’t Murdoch a liberal?
“#51 Are you still being paid, swiftboater?
Comment by JPark — February 27, 2007 @ 10:37 pm”
Don’t need the money! I’m independantly wealthy!
February 27th, 2007 at 10:46 pmPoor michael. He seems to be desperately in need of being selected as Jeff Gannon’s protege’. Oh to be the chosen one to have the honor of being summoned to the White House to service Uncle Karl, Tricky Dicky, Tony the Tiger and Curious George.
Poor michael. He’s obviously blindly in love with the nazi neocon ultra right. He’s devoured everything and every lie they’ve repeated mercilessly. Which proves why he would be so perfect as Jeff Gannon’s newest protege’, he’ll swallow anything.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:46 pm“Please michael, explain why bush didn’t serve? Stupid old hate filled c*nt.
Comment by ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus — February 27, 2007 @ 10:45 pm”
Bush did serve! The same time kerry the fraud did!
February 27th, 2007 at 10:47 pmHave you chosen the screen name crazy for a reason? You might want to check the subject matter of this thread before you go any further? Comment by michael — February 27, 2007 @ 10:44 pm
Why are you such a cowardly old c*nt michael? Did you soil your skirt again, or did Vince P do that for you?
February 27th, 2007 at 10:48 pm#63 I thought it was known that Bush is one gaping pussy.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:48 pm#67 Are you kidding Mikey? Are you really that stupid?
February 27th, 2007 at 10:48 pmAny topic!
Comment by michael
‘Why’ is not a topic. It’s a Questions. Debating is answering questions and not asking them.
What is the point of two debaters who simply stand their and keep repeating why?
February 27th, 2007 at 10:48 pm“Maybe because he became an activist and listened to his conscience? A feature missing from your old toothless scull, c*nt.
Comment by ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus — February 27, 2007 @ 10:45 pm”
So you think it’s ok to badmouth the soldiers in the field and meet with the enemy during a war?
February 27th, 2007 at 10:48 pmThis is your own challenge, and I expect you to live up to it.
Still waiting for you and Rachel to accept my challenge? If you have the nerve. Any topic!
Comment by michael
Comment by Zooey — February 27, 2007 @ 10:44 pm
Michael is an old pansy, that’s why he avoided Vietnam, and now feels guilty while real men like Kerry served. Pansies like he and Bush cowered here while real men fought. Now he’s a keyboarding coward, just like he was a real coward when he was young. The stupid old c*nt.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:49 pmBush served!!! Funny stuff moron!!
February 27th, 2007 at 10:49 pmBush did serve! The same time kerry the fraud did!
Comment by michael — February 27, 2007 @ 10:47 pm
If he didn’t finish his service admirably, he didn’t serve. Besides, no one remembers bush serving, same isn’t true for Kerry. Prove bush served, you useless old c*nt!
February 27th, 2007 at 10:50 pm“Why are you such a cowardly old c*nt michael? Did you soil your skirt again, or did Vince P do that for you?
Comment by ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus — February 27, 2007 @ 10:48 pm”
I love it when I get the best of you and force you to resort to name calling instead of intelligent discussion?
February 27th, 2007 at 10:50 pmBush did serve! The same time kerry the fraud did!
Comment by michael
Please pull your why out of your derrier and stick it into today.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:50 pmDon’t need the money! I’m independantly wealthy!
Comment by michael — February 27, 2007 @ 10:46 pm
Another beltway bandit, that stole his way to the top? That explains why your only life is on this blog - you loser old c*nt!
February 27th, 2007 at 10:51 pm“He’s devoured everything and every lie they’ve repeated mercilessly. Which proves why he would be so perfect as Jeff Gannon’s newest protege’, he’ll swallow anything.
Comment by Mr. Evil — February 27, 2007 @ 10:46 pm”
What lies?
February 27th, 2007 at 10:51 pm#16- Ashenshard, I just hate the thought of a Swiftboater representing our country. I’ll bet he’d be like John Bolton: nasty and mean. I didn’t expect Bush to nominate a Democrat, but nominating a Swiftboater is a slap in the face to Kerry in particular and Democrats in general.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:52 pmSo you think it’s ok to badmouth the soldiers in the field and meet with the enemy during a war?
Comment by michael — February 27, 2007 @ 10:48 pm
That’s ironic coming from a CON!!!!
You think telling the truth is badmouthing? Well since the truth against CONs is so disgusting, that would be your stance old c*nt.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:53 pmWhat lies?
Comment by michael — February 27, 2007 @ 10:51 pm
What truths, you liar?
February 27th, 2007 at 10:53 pm“If he didn’t finish his service admirably, he didn’t serve. Besides, no one remembers bush serving, same isn’t true for Kerry. Prove bush served, you useless old c*nt!
Comment by ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus — February 27, 2007 @ 10:50 pm”
Sure he finished. The difference between him and the traitor is he didn’t lie about soldiers fighting in Nam or meet with the enemy in Paris!
February 27th, 2007 at 10:53 pmmichael,
I’m waiting to debate you. Try not to be frightened.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:53 pmI love it when I get the best of you and force you to resort to name calling instead of intelligent discussion?
Comment by michael — February 27, 2007 @ 10:50 pm
I raise to the level of my audience, which in your place is the toilet, you st*pid old p*nsy c*nt!
February 27th, 2007 at 10:54 pmI will say this one time ‘why’.
Bush did not fulfill his 6 year promise to America. . He copped out early for B-school.
It does not matter one whit what Kerry did or did not supposedly do.
Do you understand?
February 27th, 2007 at 10:54 pm“Another beltway bandit, that stole his way to the top? That explains why your only life is on this blog - you loser old c*nt!
Comment by ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus — February 27, 2007 @ 10:51 pm”
Is calling me names and insults the only ammunition you have?
February 27th, 2007 at 10:54 pmRepeating the same question again proves nothing you liar! Blind alleigence? Your undying man love for a deserter from the air national guard would be laughable if his actions hadn’t led to so much death and destruction.
Damn I said I was going to ignore the moronic brown shirt troll fv
February 27th, 2007 at 10:55 pmSure he finished. The difference between him and the traitor is he didn’t lie about soldiers fighting in Nam or meet with the enemy in Paris! Comment by michael — February 27, 2007 @ 10:53 pm
Neither event ever happened. You’re a liar.
February 27th, 2007 at 10:55 pm“I raise to the level of my audience, which in your place is the toilet, you st*pid old p*nsy c*nt!
Comment by ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus — February 27, 2007 @ 10:54 pm”
I love when you talk to me like that! It reinforces everything Ann Coulter says about you liberals and that is you can’t carry on an intelligent discussion because you are just dumb children!
February 27th, 2007 at 10:56 pmI really enjoy making michael jump in to a tissy, the old prissy c*nt just can’t stand Kerry! Poor think has Kerry Derangement Syndrome!
Come on michael, back up your ridiculous claims!
Swiftboater = michael = dumbest lying c*nts in camouflage panties around!
February 27th, 2007 at 10:57 pm“michael,
I’m waiting to debate you. Try not to be frightened.
Comment by Zooey — February 27, 2007 @ 10:53 pm”
Ok, kerry’s military service? You go first?
February 27th, 2007 at 10:58 pmWhat lies?
Comment by michael
Is the question mark emblem worn off your keyboard yet?
February 27th, 2007 at 10:59 pmI love when you talk to me like that! It reinforces everything Ann Coulter says about you liberals and that is you can’t carry on an intelligent discussion because you are just dumb children!
Comment by michael — February 27, 2007 @ 10:56 pm
BAHAHAHA, if you actually read Ann Coutler, that says everything we need to know about exactly how st*pid you are - old c*nt!!!
Your idea of ‘discussion’, rehash old debunked smears, and call it facts!
Yep you’re an Ann C*nter fan all right, and you’re as big of a b*tch as she is, you old st*pid c*nt!
Someone like you who’s sole ability to *debate* is to act like a three year old and say *why*, *why*, just shows exactly how st*pid you and the rest of the Ann C*nter hypocrites are!!
What a st*pid old fool you are!
February 27th, 2007 at 10:59 pmAbout the only thing Bush “served’ was spunk bisquits to his twisted frat-mates. Bush is a total fraud, michael. Can’t you read? It’s everywhere!
Kerry was “in the shit” as was the common term used to describe a Vietnam Vet that actually saw combat. The only shit you can use to describe Bush is full of shit, bullshit, dumbshit, dipshit, shit-for-brains, shithead and piece of shit. Got it, shit stain?
February 27th, 2007 at 11:00 pm“Neither event ever happened. You’re a liar.
Comment by ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus — February 27, 2007 @ 10:55 pm”
Sure did and it’s all over the internet. You’re embarrassing yourself by denying it!
February 27th, 2007 at 11:00 pmIs calling me names and insults the only ammunition you have?
Comment by michael — February 27, 2007 @ 10:54 pm
That’s more than you’ve got, stupid old c*nt, so I win ;)
February 27th, 2007 at 11:00 pmOk, kerry’s military service? You go first?
Comment by michael — February 27, 2007 @ 10:58 pm
He had a real one, neither you nor bush did.
Your turn, st*pid old c*nt!
February 27th, 2007 at 11:01 pmIs the question mark emblem worn off your keyboard yet?
Comment by Crazy Eddie — February 27, 2007 @ 10:59 pm
It wore out, when he was use it as a s*xual aid on Vince P the other night.
February 27th, 2007 at 11:02 pmI love when you talk to me like that! It reinforces everything Ann Coulter says about you liberals and that is you can’t carry on an intelligent discussion because you are just dumb children!
Comment by michael
That certainly explains alot about your opines here. You read plagiarism and accept it as wisdom. Anne Coulter is a pundit and will tell you what you think. Can you grasp the psychology of that?
February 27th, 2007 at 11:02 pm“Your undying man love for a deserter from the air national guard would be laughable if his actions hadn’t led to so much death and destruction.
Damn I said I was going to ignore the moronic brown shirt troll fv
Comment by klyde — February 27, 2007 @ 10:55 pm”
Deserter? Last time I checked they don’t issue Honorable Discharges to deserters. Maybe that explains why kerry didn’t get his until Carter’s amnesty program was implemented?
February 27th, 2007 at 11:03 pmWe’re waiting michael for you to back up at least one of your ridiculous right wing nut statements!
Come on michael, keep proving how lunatic you and your fringe chickenhawks are!!!
February 27th, 2007 at 11:03 pmOk, kerry’s military service? You go first?
Comment by michael
Sorry michael, the challenge was issued yesterday:
Ok, michael. The topic of today’s debate is “michael is a complete and utter moron.†Your task in this debate is to argue in favor of that position.
You start.
February 27th, 2007 at 11:03 pmCan you grasp the psychology of that?
Comment by Crazy Eddie — February 27, 2007 @ 11:02 pm
That old c*nt is still trying to grasp the meaning of the “?” on his keyboard, you want him to get psychology? That would be a ‘reach’ for that pond scum.
February 27th, 2007 at 11:05 pmTime for din din! I’ll be back because the snow has caused our cable to go out. This should give most of you about a half hour to dust off your “Debating For Idiots” book?
February 27th, 2007 at 11:05 pmMichael, I could write a book about what your opinions are and have you think that I am a great wise old owl because I have written everything that you ever thought was true.
I can agree with your bias and sell you a load of crap and never look back. While you ‘debate’ about your bias complex legislation is slid right under your nose I am profitting off your hate.
How do you like me now?
February 27th, 2007 at 11:06 pmDeserter? Last time I checked they don’t issue Honorable Discharges to deserters. Maybe that explains why kerry didn’t get his until Carter’s amnesty program was implemented?
Comment by michael — February 27, 2007 @ 11:03 pm
Still can’t back up your claims? Figures Ann C*nter, dum b*tch.
Papa Bush being in the CIA Core, had nothing to do with junior’s fake discharge? BAHAHAHA, yeah right. You’re the must gullible old c*nt on your block aren’t you?
February 27th, 2007 at 11:06 pmAsking michael to debate, is like asking Bush to speak ‘English’!!! Not gonna happen!
February 27th, 2007 at 11:07 pmTime for din din! I’ll be back because the snow has caused our cable to go out. This should give most of you about a half hour to dust off your “Debating For Idiots†book?
Comment by michael — February 27, 2007 @ 11:05 pm
An independently wealthy man, at the whim of Cable?
Yeah, you aren’t dum, you’re r*t*rded!
Is that where you learned to debate michael, from ‘Idiots’? Yes, we all know, st*pid c*nt, and she was called Ann!!!
You people are a pathetic laughing stock to everyone but yourselves! BAHAHAHA, I laugh AT you, st*pid c*nt!
February 27th, 2007 at 11:09 pmOk, kerry’s military service? You go first?
Comment by michael
Why you are trying to rehash old smear is beyond me.
This guy Fox clearly has conflicts of interest. What kind of an Ambassador for America would such a guy make? An ambassador represents all of America, not just half of it. An ambassador should not be nationalist in his ways, but internationalist, something this man is clearly lacking.
February 27th, 2007 at 11:10 pmTime for din din! I’ll be back because the snow has caused our cable to go out. This should give most of you about a half hour to dust off your “Debating For Idiots†book?
Comment by michael
michael, I just threw your balls in my garbage disposal and flipped the switch.
February 27th, 2007 at 11:10 pmWhat michael, and his hordes of fellow fools don’t know, is that it takes two competent people to ‘debate’, otherwise it’s a ’speech’.
You’re welcome michael for our ’speech’, because you aren’t smart enough to debate a kindergarten mind (Ann Coulter), let alone an adult. You people are sick, stupid fcuks, and if you think you’re anything but that you are lying to yourself as much as you lie hear - fcuker!!
February 27th, 2007 at 11:12 pmIt’s simple. michael is as delusional as George Bush. If Ann (Pus Crack) Coulter said that it was ok for men to have sex with young boys michael would accept it immediately as absolute fact. Maybe michael wishes he was Mark Foley.
February 27th, 2007 at 11:13 pmmichael, I just threw your balls in my garbage disposal and flipped the switch.
Comment by Zooey — February 27, 2007 @ 11:10 pm
You can’t disposal what michael never had. That’s why he cowered behind a desk, when ‘real men’ fought in Vietnam. Heck there were minions of women that were braver than that st*pid old c*nt, when women weren’t even supposed to be brave in the military!
michael is why the word ‘pansy’ exists.
February 27th, 2007 at 11:13 pmWhy you are trying to rehash old smear is beyond me.
Comment by Crazy Eddie — February 27, 2007 @ 11:10 pm
Because smears are all that michael and the swiftboaters have. Truth has a liberal bias, and they hate the truth and liberals equally!
February 27th, 2007 at 11:14 pmTime for din din! I’ll be back because the snow has caused our cable to go out. This should give most of you about a half hour to dust off your “Debating For Idiots†book?
Comment by michael
Actually I was reading the left behind series of books and was hoping armageddon would hurry up and get here so you would sink into the bowels of the earth, cause you pal, aint gonna pass the test with your curennt way of thinking.
February 27th, 2007 at 11:15 pmswiftboaters, lowest of the low
February 27th, 2007 at 11:15 pmsharing their quid pro quo
with the Executive Ho
got paid for their dog and pony show
That old c*nt is still trying to grasp the meaning of the “?â€
Mwah.
February 27th, 2007 at 11:17 pmmichael,
February 27th, 2007 at 11:19 pmRead my post in #36 and use the link provided therein. If you go there, you will find that he is both male and straight I try to be impartial and factual in each of my posts. Idi Amin would be a better ambasidor than this political hack.
Is calling me names and insults the only ammunition you have?
Comment by michael
No, it’s all Anne Coulter has. Didn’t you read her book?
February 27th, 2007 at 11:22 pmA quick perusal of Michael’s comments and responses on any of the threads during the last couple of weeks tells me it is absurd and useless to engage him in any fashion whatsoever. This business of continuing the thoroughly discredited bullshit spewed forth by the Swiftboat liars for treason is simply the latest outrage. The a-hole isn’t here for an argument. He’s here to be annoying. I suggest that people just ignore him and he’ll crawl back into his dark little hole.
February 27th, 2007 at 11:27 pmHow stupid is michael? Stupid enough to debunk himself!
michael: Deserter? Last time I checked they don’t issue Honorable Discharges to deserters.
Explain to us all why it took kerry over 5 years to get an Honorable Discharge when the rest of us got ours 1 year after our separation from inactive duty? Comment by michael — February 27, 2007 @ 10:25 pm
So michael believes that Honorable discharges occur only to Republican deserters?
What a st*pid old c*nt!
February 27th, 2007 at 11:31 pm#121 - Bluedog49,
February 27th, 2007 at 11:31 pmBut michael is so vulnerable!
he a-hole isn’t here for an argument. He’s here to be annoying. I suggest that people just ignore him and he’ll crawl back into his dark little hole. Comment by Bluedog49 — February 27, 2007 @ 11:27 pm
He isn’t here for debate, he’s an attention starved old st*pid c*nt shut-in. That’s obvious.
He won’t crawl back in his hole, the best we can hope is TP bans him because he’s not hear to debate, discuss or carry on a debate - and therefore in breach of the terms of use. He’s only here to p*ss on everyone’s cornflakes, because he’s a miserable old c*nt with no life. But it’s not likely they’ll ban him. They probably like having someone that stupid representing the GOPutzes.
February 27th, 2007 at 11:34 pmI agree with bluedog49. Why let michael hijack the entire thread with his moronic entries? He’s an ignorant human being with nothing to offer to the discussion. Ignore him and he’ll crawl back under his rock.
February 27th, 2007 at 11:37 pmMy 123,
February 27th, 2007 at 11:37 pmIts like shooting a walrus in a barrel. You can’t miss!
#126 Maybe we shouldn’t shoot him. He is an endangered species. The spotted waffling moron should be protected.
February 27th, 2007 at 11:42 pmHe’s an ignorant human being with nothing to offer to the discussion. Ignore him and he’ll crawl back under his rock.
Comment by bye bye GOP — February 27, 2007 @ 11:37 pm
That’s a nice theory, but it’s not reality. That’s the theory Dems used for decades as the religious right rose to almost 1/3 of the population. Fanatics like michael don’t just crawl under a rock and stay, they come out to poison anyone they can bight.
February 27th, 2007 at 11:42 pm#127 - JPark,
February 27th, 2007 at 11:45 pmYou may be right, neocons are an endangered species.
My #129,
February 27th, 2007 at 11:50 pmPerhaps we should set aside a portion of the Alaskan National Wild Life Preserve as a habitat?
Ah Yes, Bushland Uber Allies FAVOURITE ACT–TO REWARD POLITICAL ALLIES WITHOUT ANY THOUGHT ABOUT THEIR ABILITY OR CREDENTIALS, AS LONG AS THEY ARE FAITHFUL FOLLOWERS OF CHIMPya and his Nazi-Fascist Regime and ASS-KISSERS of CHIMPya and Torticola Cheney and Bushland Uber Allies!!!!! SICKENING, VILE and JUST ASKING TO BE PUNISHED BY DEATH BY RIGHTEOUS VENGEANCE!!!!!
February 27th, 2007 at 11:55 pm#130 Oh, no, Walt. I am thinking we should set aside a little spot in Compton for the spotted waffling moron. Maybe it wouldn’t be a “permanent” habitat for them but it would be a good show on Fox.
February 27th, 2007 at 11:56 pm#132 - JPark,
February 28th, 2007 at 12:00 amCompton? To me that’s an encyclopedea.
#133 Harlem?
February 28th, 2007 at 12:06 am#134 - JPark,
February 28th, 2007 at 12:22 amStill draws a blank. I used the Google, Yahoo and Ask.
Being an old fart, I am off to the sack. Nighty-Nite.
February 28th, 2007 at 12:23 amSouth Central?
February 28th, 2007 at 12:24 amI have been to Belgium, and I do not like the place, so let the Bush lover be ambassador to that stinky nation. Netherlands is nice country.
February 28th, 2007 at 12:52 amFirst rate hires first rate. Second rate hires third rate. Bush is definitely not first rate, nor even second rate, which explains a lot about his appointees’ qualifications and performance and the mess the USA finds itself in.
February 28th, 2007 at 2:45 amFrom the day the Texas Air National guard began requiring a drug test as part of the flight physical—Bush never again took the flight physical. No take flight physical, no can fly. He never flew for years. His only obligation was flying—not showing up once to take advance of a free dental checkup. Many in his unit in Alabama said they were looking out for the wild Texan son of a congressman—but he never showed up !!!
How many combat medals did Kerry win? Five? Kerry volunteered for the military and also volunteered for swiftboat combat duty when he could have stayed on the carrier away from combat. The ones actually on his swiftboat said everything Kerry said was true. So did Vietnamese villagers interviewed on 60 minutes. Some other swiftboaters lied—I guess they were mad because Kerry later spoke out against the war. I seen it happen many times.
Bush should never have been in the champagne unit. His test score was lower than the 300 who were on the waiting list BEFORE him. I’ve seen his test score and it looks like it was altered to reach the minimum. You also don’t go straight to officer without ROTC which Bush never did.
February 28th, 2007 at 4:13 amBill Maher: George of the Bungle
http://politicalhumor.about.com/ od/ bushvideos/ v/ maherbushbungle.htm
Mocking President Bush for general ineptitude, comedian Bill Maher delivered a funny rant as part of his “New Rules” segment on HBO’s “Real Time With Bill Maher”:
“Seriously, Mr. President, this job can’t be fun for you anymore. There’s no more money to spend; you used up all of that. You can’t start another war because you also used up the army. And now, darn the luck, the rest of your term has become the Bush family nightmare: helping poor people.”
“New rule: American must recall the president. That’s what this country needs – a good old-fashioned, California-style recall election, complete with Gary Coleman, porno actresses, and action film stars. And just like Schwarzenegger’s predecessor here in California, George Bush is now so unpopular, he must now defend his job against…Russell Crowe, because at this point I want a leader who will throw a phone at somebody. In fact, let’s have only phone throwers. Naomi Campbell can be the vice president.
“Now I kid, but seriously, Mr. President, this job can’t be fun for you anymore. There’s no more money to spend; you used up all of that. You can’t start another war because you also used up the army. And now, darn the luck, the rest of your term has become the Bush family nightmare: helping poor people. Yeah, listen to your mom, the cupboard’s bare, the credit card’s maxed out, and no one’s speaking to you. Mission accomplished.
“Now it’s time to do what you’ve always done best: lose interest and walk away. Like you did with your military service. And the oil company. And the baseball team. It’s time to move on and try the next fantasy job. How about cowboy or spaceman? Now, I know what you’re saying, you’re saying that there are so many other things that you as president could involve yourself in. Please don’t. I know, there a lot left to do. There’s a war with Venezuela, and eliminating the sales tax of yachts, turning the space program over to the church and Social Security to Fannie Mae, giving embryos the vote.
“But sir, none of that is going to happen now. Why? Because you govern like Billy Joel drives. You’ve performed so poor, I’m surprised you haven’t given yourself a medal. You’re a catastrophe that walks like a man. Herbert Hoover was a shitty president, but even he never conceded an entire metropolis to rising water and snakes. On your watch, we’ve lost almost all of our allies, the surplus, four airliners, two trade centers, a piece of the Pentagon, and the city of New Orleans. Maybe you’re just not lucky. I’m not saying you don’t love this country, I’m just wondering how much worse it could be if you were on the other side. So yes, God does speak to you, and what he’s saying is, ‘Take a hint.’”
-Bill Maher, HBO’s “Real Time With Bill Maher,” Sept. 9, 2005
———————————————————————-
http://politicalhumor.about.com/ library/ images/ blpic-rovearrested.htm
Karl Rove’s Perp Walk
View a doctored photo depicting Karl Rove being hauled away from the White House in handcuffs.
———————————————————————-
http://www.borowitzreport.com/ archive_rpt.asp?rec=1255&srch=
Rove Caught Cheating in White House Ethics Class
Just days after President George W. Bush ordered the White House staff to take what was called a “refresher” course on ethics, his top aide Karl Rove was caught cheating during the first pop quiz given in the course. (From the Borowitz Report)
February 28th, 2007 at 4:57 am———————————————————————-
I have been to Belgium, and I do not like the place, so let the Bush lover be ambassador to that stinky nation. Netherlands is nice country.
Comment by Jay Randal — February 28, 2007 @ 12:52 am
Stinky nation? Explain…
February 28th, 2007 at 10:35 amI dunno. I suspect thet Fox might be the perfect “ambassador” for the Dubya maladministration. I’m quite sure that he’ll carry across the maladministration’s blinkered and perverse views.
Whether he’ll help the U.S. interests much is a different question….
Cheers,
February 28th, 2007 at 2:03 pmSo, the radical islamic guy who donated 15,000$ to the Republican Party will receive also an Embassy appointment?
February 28th, 2007 at 3:05 pm[…] to Belgium. Sens. John Kerry and Chris Dodd led the opposition to the appointment. Fox contributed $50,000 to the “Swift Boat Veterans for Truth,” a group that slanderously attacking Senator […]
March 28th, 2007 at 11:38 am[…] morning, the White House withdrew the nomination of Swift Boat Vets funder Sam Fox to be ambassador to Belgium. If there was any question whether the White House’s move […]
March 28th, 2007 at 3:04 pm[…] reports: “President Bush named Republican fundraiser Sam Fox as U.S. ambassador to Belgium on Wednesday, using a maneuver that allowed him to bypass Congress […]
April 4th, 2007 at 4:51 pm