<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did White House Pull Nomination To Avoid Questions Over 2004 Minority Voter Suppression?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:09:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Think Progress &#187; Sampson Lied Under Oath: &#8216;Had In Mind&#8217; Plan To Replace U.S. Attorneys With Loyal Bushies</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/comment-page-3/#comment-3704196</link>
		<dc:creator>Think Progress &#187; Sampson Lied Under Oath: &#8216;Had In Mind&#8217; Plan To Replace U.S. Attorneys With Loyal Bushies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 21:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/#comment-3704196</guid>
		<description>[...] But a new e-mail released to the House Judiciary Committee shows that on Jan. 9, 2006 &#8212; a year before the prosecutors were fired &#8212; Sampson recommended replacements for almost every one of the U.S. attorneys on the administration&#8217;s hit list, suggesting that these prosecutors were fired to make way for partisan loyalists. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But a new e-mail released to the House Judiciary Committee shows that on Jan. 9, 2006 &#8212; a year before the prosecutors were fired &#8212; Sampson recommended replacements for almost every one of the U.S. attorneys on the administration&#8217;s hit list, suggesting that these prosecutors were fired to make way for partisan loyalists. [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=3704196', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Impeach for Peace, Boston Chapter &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Tell Karl Rove: Testify Under Oath</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/comment-page-3/#comment-2719850</link>
		<dc:creator>Impeach for Peace, Boston Chapter &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Tell Karl Rove: Testify Under Oath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/#comment-2719850</guid>
		<description>[...] Harriet Miers. Indeed, the candidate proposed to replace a U.S. Attorney fired in Arkansas was a aide to, and protege of, Mr. Rove &#8212; with relatively little prosecutorial experience, but plenty of experience in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Harriet Miers. Indeed, the candidate proposed to replace a U.S. Attorney fired in Arkansas was a aide to, and protege of, Mr. Rove &#8212; with relatively little prosecutorial experience, but plenty of experience in [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=2719850', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yellowbird</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/comment-page-3/#comment-2680354</link>
		<dc:creator>Yellowbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 19:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/#comment-2680354</guid>
		<description>The only problem with the reporting of this story is that it keeps referring to the disenfranchisement of Black voters.  Although that is quite true, the fact is that what these people are doing is disenfranchising ALL Democrats, regardless of their color.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only problem with the reporting of this story is that it keeps referring to the disenfranchisement of Black voters.  Although that is quite true, the fact is that what these people are doing is disenfranchising ALL Democrats, regardless of their color.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=2680354', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: siri</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/comment-page-3/#comment-2640480</link>
		<dc:creator>siri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 02:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/#comment-2640480</guid>
		<description>So, where are the emails that were erroneously sent?  We could sure use those surfacing right about now.  Also, has anyone thought to fully look into the pasts and track records of the other replacement attorneys?  I&#039;m extremely interested to see what comes to the surface when inquiries are made regarding the newbies.  

Without doubt, at least some if not all have &lt;em&gt;some&lt;/em&gt; past history of being hacks and thugs.  Why would Bu$h change course here and now, afterall?  It is what he is, it&#039;s all he&#039;s ever hired, it&#039;s all he&#039;s ever known.   

Gonzalez needs to be impeached, then his boss and his boss&#039;s boss (Bu$h and Cheney respectively) so that this country can get on with the healing and reparations that are going to last for GENERATIONS.

IMPEACH!
INVESTIGATE
INDICT
IMPRISON BU$H, CHENEY, RICE, GONZO et.al.
PELOSI IN &#039;07!

siri
Sovereign Citizen of the Former United States of America</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, where are the emails that were erroneously sent?  We could sure use those surfacing right about now.  Also, has anyone thought to fully look into the pasts and track records of the other replacement attorneys?  I&#8217;m extremely interested to see what comes to the surface when inquiries are made regarding the newbies.  </p>
<p>Without doubt, at least some if not all have <em>some</em> past history of being hacks and thugs.  Why would Bu$h change course here and now, afterall?  It is what he is, it&#8217;s all he&#8217;s ever hired, it&#8217;s all he&#8217;s ever known.   </p>
<p>Gonzalez needs to be impeached, then his boss and his boss&#8217;s boss (Bu$h and Cheney respectively) so that this country can get on with the healing and reparations that are going to last for GENERATIONS.</p>
<p>IMPEACH!<br />
INVESTIGATE<br />
INDICT<br />
IMPRISON BU$H, CHENEY, RICE, GONZO et.al.<br />
PELOSI IN &#8216;07!</p>
<p>siri<br />
Sovereign Citizen of the Former United States of America<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=2640480', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The BRAD BLOG : Evidence Suggests U.S. Attorney Firings May Have Been Part of White House Scheme to Help Game 2008 Election</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/comment-page-3/#comment-2619666</link>
		<dc:creator>The BRAD BLOG : Evidence Suggests U.S. Attorney Firings May Have Been Part of White House Scheme to Help Game 2008 Election</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/#comment-2619666</guid>
		<description>[...] recently dismissed Palast&#039;s reporting in a radio interview. &quot;I&#039;m intimately familiar with [Palast&#039;s] allegations. That is a web article [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently dismissed Palast&#8217;s reporting in a radio interview. &#8220;I&#8217;m intimately familiar with [Palast's] allegations. That is a web article [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=2619666', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rough1</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/comment-page-3/#comment-2452739</link>
		<dc:creator>Rough1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/#comment-2452739</guid>
		<description>This is more of the same check it out....More from WaPo:

Sharon Eubanks said Bush loyalists in Attorney General Alberto Gonzales&#039; office began micromanaging the team&#039;s strategy in the final weeks of the 2005 trial, to the detriment of the government&#039;s claim that the industry had conspired to lie to U.S. smokers.

She said a supervisor demanded that she and her trial team drop arguments that tobacco executives be removed from their corporate positions as a possible penalty. He and two others instructed her to tell key witnesses to change their testimony. And they ordered Eubanks to read verbatim from a closing argument they rewrote for her, she said.

``The political people were pushing the buttons and ordering us to say what we said,&#039;&#039; Eubanks said. ``And because of that, we failed to zealously represent the interests of the American public.&#039;&#039;

Eubanks, who served for 22 years as a lawyer at Justice, said three political appointees were responsible for the last-minute shifts in the government&#039;s tobacco case in June 2005: then-Associate Attorney General Robert McCallum, then-Assistant Attorney General Peter Keisler, and his deputy at the time, Dan Meron.

Do you believe this shit? 
End result:

News reports on the strategy changes at the time caused an uproar in Congress and sparked an inquiry by the Justice Department. Government witnesses said they had been asked to change testimony and one expert withdrew from the case. Government lawyers also announced that they were scaling back a proposed penalty against the industry from $130 billion to $10 billion.

Was this the big enchillada they were trying to hide? 
It is pretty GOD DAMNED BIG! 
If there is more, OMG. 
I can&#039;t wait to hear it. 
This showdown is REAL, and it is a REAL constitutional crisis. 
To me, this is looking more significant than Watergate. 
EAT it trolls</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is more of the same check it out&#8230;.More from WaPo:</p>
<p>Sharon Eubanks said Bush loyalists in Attorney General Alberto Gonzales&#8217; office began micromanaging the team&#8217;s strategy in the final weeks of the 2005 trial, to the detriment of the government&#8217;s claim that the industry had conspired to lie to U.S. smokers.</p>
<p>She said a supervisor demanded that she and her trial team drop arguments that tobacco executives be removed from their corporate positions as a possible penalty. He and two others instructed her to tell key witnesses to change their testimony. And they ordered Eubanks to read verbatim from a closing argument they rewrote for her, she said.</p>
<p>&#8220;The political people were pushing the buttons and ordering us to say what we said,&#8221; Eubanks said. &#8220;And because of that, we failed to zealously represent the interests of the American public.&#8221;</p>
<p>Eubanks, who served for 22 years as a lawyer at Justice, said three political appointees were responsible for the last-minute shifts in the government&#8217;s tobacco case in June 2005: then-Associate Attorney General Robert McCallum, then-Assistant Attorney General Peter Keisler, and his deputy at the time, Dan Meron.</p>
<p>Do you believe this shit?<br />
End result:</p>
<p>News reports on the strategy changes at the time caused an uproar in Congress and sparked an inquiry by the Justice Department. Government witnesses said they had been asked to change testimony and one expert withdrew from the case. Government lawyers also announced that they were scaling back a proposed penalty against the industry from $130 billion to $10 billion.</p>
<p>Was this the big enchillada they were trying to hide?<br />
It is pretty GOD DAMNED BIG!<br />
If there is more, OMG.<br />
I can&#8217;t wait to hear it.<br />
This showdown is REAL, and it is a REAL constitutional crisis.<br />
To me, this is looking more significant than Watergate.<br />
EAT it trolls<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=2452739', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drhammer</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/comment-page-3/#comment-2396798</link>
		<dc:creator>drhammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/#comment-2396798</guid>
		<description>I am a reasonably articulate person who happens to believe that there are moments when the use of profanity is the most accurate way to express the depth of my feelings.

And I am apologizing in advance to any third party who might be offended by my choice of words. Obviously, those who are the target(s) of my disdain are exempt from my contrition.

I would caution, however, that those who read my words do so against the backdrop of my entire post. To experience knee-jerk outrage over a single hot-button word puts one squarely in Karl Rove&#039;s target audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a reasonably articulate person who happens to believe that there are moments when the use of profanity is the most accurate way to express the depth of my feelings.</p>
<p>And I am apologizing in advance to any third party who might be offended by my choice of words. Obviously, those who are the target(s) of my disdain are exempt from my contrition.</p>
<p>I would caution, however, that those who read my words do so against the backdrop of my entire post. To experience knee-jerk outrage over a single hot-button word puts one squarely in Karl Rove&#8217;s target audience.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=2396798', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Think Progress &#187; Justice Dept. Used Pregnancy As Excuse To Appoint Griffin, Possibily Violating Discrimination Act</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/comment-page-3/#comment-2365673</link>
		<dc:creator>Think Progress &#187; Justice Dept. Used Pregnancy As Excuse To Appoint Griffin, Possibily Violating Discrimination Act</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 21:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/#comment-2365673</guid>
		<description>[...] In June 2006, the Justice Department fired Bud Cummins as U.S. attorney in Arkansas and replaced him with Karl Rove-protege Tim Griffin. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In June 2006, the Justice Department fired Bud Cummins as U.S. attorney in Arkansas and replaced him with Karl Rove-protege Tim Griffin. [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=2365673', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Pryor</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/comment-page-3/#comment-2361518</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Pryor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/#comment-2361518</guid>
		<description>This is such a waste of internet space it isn&#039;t funny.  Didn&#039;t happen.  Find something truthful or stop writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is such a waste of internet space it isn&#8217;t funny.  Didn&#8217;t happen.  Find something truthful or stop writing.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=2361518', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eeplebneesta</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/comment-page-3/#comment-2361360</link>
		<dc:creator>eeplebneesta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/#comment-2361360</guid>
		<description>How can this guy maintain all of his power and authority by remaining &quot;interim?&quot;  This is utter BS.  If congressional approval can be bypassed this easily, then we&#039;re in big trouble.  And allowing interims to serve for an unlimited time was a provision snuck into the &quot;patriot act&quot; at the last minute... Now why would a law abiding, honest administration seek to allow judges to be appointed for an unlimited time with no congressional approval?
To all the wingnuts:  For everyone of these outrageous actions, ask yourself &quot;Would this piss me off if Democrats did it?  Would the Republics be all over it like profit on Halliburton? Or like roaches on a wounded soldier?&quot;
Also to all wingnuts who say that opening mail, reading email, monitoring phone calls, pulling bank records, etc, are all OK if you have nothing to hide:  If this guy has nothing to hide, then why won&#039;t he testify under oath?  Since it&#039;s not OK to him, by your own &quot;logic&quot; he has something to hide.
(I know, I know:  A -&gt; ~B /-&gt;/ ~B -&gt; A)

Personally, I&#039;d like to see a law that says that EVERYTHING stated by a politician in public, or at least at a press conference, considered to be under oath (even if being under oath is a sin against Christ, which the &quot;Christians&quot; in gov&#039;t don&#039;t seem to be aware of.)
Then statements like:
1) &quot;We&#039;re not wiretapping Americans.&quot;
2) &quot;We are wiretapping, but we&#039;re getting warrants.&quot;
3) &quot;We are doing warrantless wiretapping.&quot;
Would be under oath.  And since no two can be true at the same time, much less all three, then one or more must be a, hmmm, what&#039;s the word I&#039;m looking for.. ahh.. LIE.  Which is also a sin.  Not a good action by a dude who talks to god.

Jesus Forbids Oaths

33 &quot;Again you have heard that it was said to those of old, &quot;You shall not
   swear falsely, but shall perform your oaths to the Lord.&#039;
34 But I say to you, do not swear at all: neither by heaven, 
   for it is God&#039;s throne;
35 nor by the earth, for it is His footstool; nor by Jerusalem, for it 
   is the city of the great King.
36 Nor shall you swear by your head, because you cannot make one hair white or black.
37 But let your &quot;Yes&#039; be &quot;Yes,&#039; and your &quot;No,&#039; &quot;No.&#039; 
   For whatever is more than these is from the evil one.

 -- JC : Sermon on the Mount

10 NINE: &#039;You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.&#039;
 -- God, aka Yaweh, Allah via Moses : The Ten Commandments.
    Read a book:  Christianity, Judaism and Islam are all Abrahamic Religions 
    and all Believe in the same god.  You all have more in common than you&#039;d 
    like to believe.  Or admit.

And don&#039;t forget:

44 But I say to you, love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to
those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute
you.

 -- JC : Sermon on the Mount

Christians should occasionally act Christian.  It&#039;s only fair.

Love me, bless me, pray for me.  Or sin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can this guy maintain all of his power and authority by remaining &#8220;interim?&#8221;  This is utter BS.  If congressional approval can be bypassed this easily, then we&#8217;re in big trouble.  And allowing interims to serve for an unlimited time was a provision snuck into the &#8220;patriot act&#8221; at the last minute&#8230; Now why would a law abiding, honest administration seek to allow judges to be appointed for an unlimited time with no congressional approval?<br />
To all the wingnuts:  For everyone of these outrageous actions, ask yourself &#8220;Would this piss me off if Democrats did it?  Would the Republics be all over it like profit on Halliburton? Or like roaches on a wounded soldier?&#8221;<br />
Also to all wingnuts who say that opening mail, reading email, monitoring phone calls, pulling bank records, etc, are all OK if you have nothing to hide:  If this guy has nothing to hide, then why won&#8217;t he testify under oath?  Since it&#8217;s not OK to him, by your own &#8220;logic&#8221; he has something to hide.<br />
(I know, I know:  A -&gt; ~B /-&gt;/ ~B -&gt; A)</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;d like to see a law that says that EVERYTHING stated by a politician in public, or at least at a press conference, considered to be under oath (even if being under oath is a sin against Christ, which the &#8220;Christians&#8221; in gov&#8217;t don&#8217;t seem to be aware of.)<br />
Then statements like:<br />
1) &#8220;We&#8217;re not wiretapping Americans.&#8221;<br />
2) &#8220;We are wiretapping, but we&#8217;re getting warrants.&#8221;<br />
3) &#8220;We are doing warrantless wiretapping.&#8221;<br />
Would be under oath.  And since no two can be true at the same time, much less all three, then one or more must be a, hmmm, what&#8217;s the word I&#8217;m looking for.. ahh.. LIE.  Which is also a sin.  Not a good action by a dude who talks to god.</p>
<p>Jesus Forbids Oaths</p>
<p>33 &#8220;Again you have heard that it was said to those of old, &#8220;You shall not<br />
   swear falsely, but shall perform your oaths to the Lord.&#8217;<br />
34 But I say to you, do not swear at all: neither by heaven,<br />
   for it is God&#8217;s throne;<br />
35 nor by the earth, for it is His footstool; nor by Jerusalem, for it<br />
   is the city of the great King.<br />
36 Nor shall you swear by your head, because you cannot make one hair white or black.<br />
37 But let your &#8220;Yes&#8217; be &#8220;Yes,&#8217; and your &#8220;No,&#8217; &#8220;No.&#8217;<br />
   For whatever is more than these is from the evil one.</p>
<p> &#8212; JC : Sermon on the Mount</p>
<p>10 NINE: &#8216;You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.&#8217;<br />
 &#8212; God, aka Yaweh, Allah via Moses : The Ten Commandments.<br />
    Read a book:  Christianity, Judaism and Islam are all Abrahamic Religions<br />
    and all Believe in the same god.  You all have more in common than you&#8217;d<br />
    like to believe.  Or admit.</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t forget:</p>
<p>44 But I say to you, love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to<br />
those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute<br />
you.</p>
<p> &#8212; JC : Sermon on the Mount</p>
<p>Christians should occasionally act Christian.  It&#8217;s only fair.</p>
<p>Love me, bless me, pray for me.  Or sin.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=2361360', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: langs</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/comment-page-2/#comment-2302235</link>
		<dc:creator>langs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 11:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/#comment-2302235</guid>
		<description>Dick Cheney was right about one thing. 
The insugency is in its last throes. 

The insurgeny of the Republican party may be in its last days after all of these hearings. 



It seems to me the Repuplcians have an affinity for the dark ages.

As long as they are kept in the dark everything is fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dick Cheney was right about one thing.<br />
The insugency is in its last throes. </p>
<p>The insurgeny of the Republican party may be in its last days after all of these hearings. </p>
<p>It seems to me the Repuplcians have an affinity for the dark ages.</p>
<p>As long as they are kept in the dark everything is fine.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=2302235', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Think Progress &#187; White House Moves Forward With Plan To &#8216;Gum To Death&#8217; U.S. Attorney Process</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/comment-page-2/#comment-2276894</link>
		<dc:creator>Think Progress &#187; White House Moves Forward With Plan To &#8216;Gum To Death&#8217; U.S. Attorney Process</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 19:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/#comment-2276894</guid>
		<description>[...] Boozman added it would &#8220;take between six and nine months&#8221; to identify Griffin&#8217;s replacement. Meanswhile, the White House has still not yet named a new nominee, and Griffin has said that he is ready and willing to serve until the end of Bush&#8217;s term. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Boozman added it would &#8220;take between six and nine months&#8221; to identify Griffin&#8217;s replacement. Meanswhile, the White House has still not yet named a new nominee, and Griffin has said that he is ready and willing to serve until the end of Bush&#8217;s term. [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=2276894', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RantingTommy</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/comment-page-2/#comment-2192914</link>
		<dc:creator>RantingTommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/#comment-2192914</guid>
		<description>Being offended by a word is silly. Especially when that word isn&#039;t aimed at you.

The people who claim the word &#039;c**t&#039; is offensive to all women apparently haven&#039;t met ALL women, because I know a few that use it quite well.

Besides, country music is more offensive than any word. But I don&#039;t call for a ban on it, I just make fun of people that have such bad hearing that they listen to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being offended by a word is silly. Especially when that word isn&#8217;t aimed at you.</p>
<p>The people who claim the word &#8216;c**t&#8217; is offensive to all women apparently haven&#8217;t met ALL women, because I know a few that use it quite well.</p>
<p>Besides, country music is more offensive than any word. But I don&#8217;t call for a ban on it, I just make fun of people that have such bad hearing that they listen to it.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=2192914', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administration Pulls US Attorney Nomination To Avoid Voter Suppression Questions. - The Liberty Lounge Political Forums</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/comment-page-2/#comment-2192574</link>
		<dc:creator>Administration Pulls US Attorney Nomination To Avoid Voter Suppression Questions. - The Liberty Lounge Political Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/#comment-2192574</guid>
		<description>[...] Pulls US Attorney Nomination To Avoid Voter Suppression Questions.   Think Progress » Did White House Pull Nomination To Avoid Questions Over 2004 Minority Voter Suppres... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pulls US Attorney Nomination To Avoid Voter Suppression Questions.   Think Progress » Did White House Pull Nomination To Avoid Questions Over 2004 Minority Voter Suppres&#8230; [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=2192574', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RussWeiss</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/comment-page-2/#comment-2192340</link>
		<dc:creator>RussWeiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/#comment-2192340</guid>
		<description>No, you&#039;ve got it wrong....Patrick! isn&#039;t a &quot;st*pid litle c*nt&quot;, he&#039;s a Republicunt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, you&#8217;ve got it wrong&#8230;.Patrick! isn&#8217;t a &#8220;st*pid litle c*nt&#8221;, he&#8217;s a Republicunt.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=2192340', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Pruitt</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/comment-page-2/#comment-2188921</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Pruitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/#comment-2188921</guid>
		<description>So we&#039;re supposed to just take Karl&#039;s favorite little blowjob at his word? Give me a break...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So we&#8217;re supposed to just take Karl&#8217;s favorite little blowjob at his word? Give me a break&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=2188921', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liberalbiasboy</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/comment-page-2/#comment-2187425</link>
		<dc:creator>liberalbiasboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 21:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/#comment-2187425</guid>
		<description>Another liberal urban myth. Got to love thingprogress and their bizarro conspiracy theories. We lost so there must be a voter supression going on. No wonder you people are called moonbats. Comment by Patrick1 â€” March 2, 2007 @ 5:53 pm
  Spoken like a true Dildo-head...............or ditto-head or whatever..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another liberal urban myth. Got to love thingprogress and their bizarro conspiracy theories. We lost so there must be a voter supression going on. No wonder you people are called moonbats. Comment by Patrick1 â€” March 2, 2007 @ 5:53 pm<br />
  Spoken like a true Dildo-head&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;or ditto-head or whatever..<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=2187425', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jakethesnake</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/comment-page-2/#comment-2187407</link>
		<dc:creator>jakethesnake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 21:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/#comment-2187407</guid>
		<description>Some of us think c u n t is a beautiful word.  I personally find the word vagina very offensive.  Why don&#039;t we all just stop using words that others find offensive and everyone will be happy.  Oh, the word happy offends you, well f u c k!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of us think c u n t is a beautiful word.  I personally find the word vagina very offensive.  Why don&#8217;t we all just stop using words that others find offensive and everyone will be happy.  Oh, the word happy offends you, well f u c k!!!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=2187407', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jakethesnake</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/comment-page-2/#comment-2187397</link>
		<dc:creator>jakethesnake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 21:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/#comment-2187397</guid>
		<description>Some people think cunt is a beautiful word.  Please don&#039;t take it from us.  It&#039;s just a word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people think cunt is a beautiful word.  Please don&#8217;t take it from us.  It&#8217;s just a word.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=2187397', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PoliHack &#187; Prosecutor Purge: &#8220;Idiocy&#8221; or Criminal Behavior?</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/comment-page-2/#comment-2182700</link>
		<dc:creator>PoliHack &#187; Prosecutor Purge: &#8220;Idiocy&#8221; or Criminal Behavior?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 07:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/02/griffin-voter-suppression/#comment-2182700</guid>
		<description>[...] Progress noted that Griffin was deeply involved in the voter suppression efforts during President George W. Bush&#8217;s the 2004 reelection [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Progress noted that Griffin was deeply involved in the voter suppression efforts during President George W. Bush&#8217;s the 2004 reelection [...]<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=2182700', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
