Thanks for creating this blog. I thought it was a very interesting read. It is so interesting reading other peoples personal take on a subject.

Interestingly, this was on CNN last week.

Conservatives despise out troops–Except when they’re dead;Then, they don’t cost any more tax dollar$.

Conservatives: You Suck!

———————————————————————————

To: Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice
cc: Chairs of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and House Committee on International Relations

We, the undersigned, vehemently oppose any U.S. military action against Iran. Such military action would inevitably kill large numbers of innocent people, foster even more hatred and international condemnation of the U.S., and dramatically increase the instability of the region. Our own intelligence agencies have concluded the Iraq war has worsened the terrorist threat, and a war against Iran would add immeasurably more fuel to the fire.

Even if Iran decided to build a nuclear weapon, experts agree that it would take several years. There is no crisis, and our government should not create one with inflammatory rhetoric or military threats. The U.S. has both the time and obligation to work with the international community to fashion a diplomatic resolution to the situation, and the current refusal of U.S. officials to talk directly with Iranian officials cannot possibly help resolve the nuclear standoff, nor contribute to peace in Iraq and the Middle East.

Therefore, we urge you to take all steps necessary to reach a peaceful resolution to the current situation, including direct negotiations without pre-conditions. This is the only way to prevent yet another war, one that would be a calamity of truly global proportions.
———————————————————————–
No War with Iran!
President Bush is now regularly accusing Iran of supporting attacks on U.S. troops, without any evidence, – remember the WMD’s in Iraq, anyone? – adding that “we will seek out and destroy” these networks. Bush has authorized U.S. forces to kill Iranian “operatives” in Iraq, and he is sending nuclear aircraft carriers and missile defense batteries to the Persian Gulf. The unthinkable – a wider war in the Middle East – is unfolding.

John D. Rockefeller IV, D-W.Va., chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said that any U.S. military move into Iran would be “catastrophically stupid” and “unleash a conflagration like we’ve never heard of before.” We could not possibly agree more.

Resistance to a Bush planned military strike on Iran is growing in Congress, but it needs your help! Sign the petition to Congress below – No War with Iran! House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said recently that she would introduce legislation to stop such a strike, so our demand is beginning to get through. But the pressure needs to be much, much stronger to stop a President who has apparently gone mad with war and his own power.

Please know that your email address is for internal purposes only; we will not send it to the petition recipients nor share it with any other organization for any purpose. Thanks also for forwarding this to your friends, colleagues and listserves. We need everyone who wants to bring peace to the Middle East and prevent a war with Iran to join the effort now!
———————————————————————————–

http://www.peace-action.org/

Actually, you need to reread my post and carefully try to understand the words. I clearly said that your leaders on the Dem side are good about “speaking out” against the war. The problem is that doesn’t mean a thing. Furthermore, Obama, Clinton, and a host of others have publicly said (this week) that they would not cut funding for the war. Obama even called Iran the biggest threat to America and neither him nor Clinton will take the military card off the table against Iran.

If what you say is so true, why are your Dem leaders not jumping into action. I honestly want an answer. If they have proof they were lied to, why are they not impeaching the liers? Why haven’t they stopped this war? Why are they not saying we can’t attack Iran? Currently, they have simply said they want to give approval to attack Iran and they are very open that they will give approval if Iran continues to enrich Uranium. Obama and Clinton have both said we cannot allow them to continue to enrich Uranium and the military option is on the table to stop them. How do you square all that?

It’s an established fact that the executive branch had different intel than was available to Congress. It’s an established fact that the executive branch told the pentagon how to shape the intel.

I haven’t seen any valid proof of that however. Comment by Roger_Roger — March 2, 2007 @ 11:52 pm

By ‘valid’, you mean proof that you’re willing to believe of course. That’s just because you’re a st*pid c*nt, and not because there isn’t proof.

IF everyone was lied to, who was the lier? Comment by Roger_Roger — March 2, 2007 @ 11:52 pm

The strawman of a st*pid c*nt. PNAC wanted to shape intelligence, and Bush saw to it that they did.

Before you answer, please provide difinetive proof. Comment by Roger_Roger — March 2, 2007 @ 11:52 pm

That was given long ago, you’re just too st*pid to admit it.

Furthermore, why the hell aren’t the Dem leaders now in power doing something about this if they truly were lied to? Comment by Roger_Roger — March 2, 2007 @ 11:52 pm

They are, that’s why they’re beginning to pull the reigns on you fcukheads on Iran.

They can stop this war anytime they want by completely defunding it alone with a host of other things. Comment by Roger_Roger — March 2, 2007 @ 11:52 pm

And make soldiers pay for the arrogance of fcukheads like you and bush? Only you guys are that immoral and hateful – fcukhead.

They currently continue to approve Bush’s funding and haven’t even brought up the notion in any legal sense about a lie. Comment by Roger_Roger — March 2, 2007 @ 11:52 pm

To the contrary – several have already spoken out about this.

THey infer it and talk about it on TV, but that is far from doing anything about it. Comment by Roger_Roger — March 2, 2007 @ 11:52 pm

As you contradict your ‘previous’ lie that they don’t bring it up. St*pid fcukhead.

Honestly, it is retarded for them to not do something about ASAP if they had any proof. Comment by Roger_Roger — March 2, 2007 @ 11:52 pm

What’s retarded is people like you that think we’d impeach a president so near an election. As for investigations – don’t worry. As 2008 approaches, you’ll get plenty of embarrassing revelations – fcukhead.

They would not be fullfilling their duty as congress to let that slide. Comment by Roger_Roger — March 2, 2007 @ 11:52 pm

The duty of Congress is to do what’s best for the country – fcukhead. Your beliefs are as relevant as your st*pid opinion on everything. You’re just an old st*pid c*nt – loser.

Honestly, it is retarded for them to not do something about ASAP if they had any proof. They would not be fullfilling their duty as congress to let that slide.

If congress was lied to, they didn’t authorize anything – but bush is Impeachable. You might also want to learn how to spell ‘nonsense’, you st*pid old fool.

You can certainly ask your Dem leaders to end this war and you can ask why Clinton and most others voted to ok the war using the same intelligence England, our President, and the UN had. You can even freely call this war illegal and use all kinds of other none sense as well. We live in the free country. I still think it is wrong to promote crimes, especailly crimes that could potentially hurt our countries security. Your response will probably be some drivel about how the war is a crime, blah blah. That is a fine opinion, but currently the war is completely legal as congress autherized it. You want a new label, go ask your Dem leaders why they still support this war with funding. Ask them why they haven’t done any meaningful thing to end it. Either way, do something constructive that doesn’t promote crimes IMO.