This is modern conservatism:
By on Mar 4th, 2007 at 12:35 pm
This is modern conservatism:
Coulter “clarifies” her Edwards remark: “C’mon, it was a joke. I would never insult gays by suggesting that they are like John Edwards. That would be mean.” Coulter also shares her views on Iran: “My thesis is that right-wingers think that Rudy Giuliani would immediately bomb Iran, and so we kind of like that. But I’d like to get that in writing before you make him our presidential nominee.”
View Most Popular
Advertisement
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
Reports
In depth studies on select topics
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Afghanistan
Bailout
Big Oil
Bolton
Bush
Cheney
Civil Rights
Congress
Earmarks
Economy
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Global Warming
Guantanamo
Health Care
Immigration
International Relations
Iran
Iraq
Justice
Kristol
LGBT
Lieberman
McCain
McClellan
Media
Military
O'Reilly
Obama
Palin
Politics
Race
Radical Right
Religion
Rice
RNC Convention
Rove
Terrorism
Third Bush Term
Torture
Veterans
Wiretapping
Women's Rights
ArchivesBlog Roll
Whether the issue concerns gay Americans, 9/11, abortion, judicial appointments or political corruption, a seamless continuum of hate runs from today’s Republican Party through to its most extreme conservative proponents. And that means the GOP differs only in degree - not in kind - from the cartoonish and sometimes criminal likes of Ann Coulter, Fred Phelps or Eric Rudolph.
For more on the mainstreaming of right-wing rage, see:
March 4th, 2007 at 12:49 pm“Coulter’s Slur and the Conservative Brand of Hate.”
Thanks for destroying Guiliani’s political career, Ann… I’m sure he’s mortified that a bigot like you just endorsed him.
March 4th, 2007 at 12:51 pmWow, Ann just cracks me up. She’s just like Dave Barry, except without the humility…and the humor.
If I wanted a smug, self-righteous person trying to tell me jokes, I’ll get Andrew Dice Clay.
Get real, woman, it’s not a joke if nobody laughs.
March 4th, 2007 at 1:05 pmYou’re just giving her what she wants: attention. Pointing out her ridiculous comments has never done much to her popularity. Why not concentrate on her enablers, the advertisers?
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/3/4/105236/4618
March 4th, 2007 at 1:05 pmNice try, Ann…you’re still a bigot.
March 4th, 2007 at 1:13 pmPeople like Ann Coulter made me a godless liberal. I refuse to be associated with any value system she endorses.
Frees me up on sunday morning. Thanks Ann!
March 4th, 2007 at 1:23 pmAnn Coulter’s parents must have really neglected her as a child. What a pathetic, insecure woman.
March 4th, 2007 at 1:32 pmThis surely is not modern conservatism–it is Ann Coulter just being Ann Coulter.
March 4th, 2007 at 1:33 pmi don’t understand why thinkprogress didn’t put the coulter quote under a massive headline like OUTRAGE or something like that. First of all, it is outrageous: it’s little better than her having called him a “n*gger” or a “kike”. And they cheered! Is there less outrage because of tacit homophobia at thinkprogress? Secondly, think of the advantages. Next time the right gets up in arms about some alleged verbal atrocity by some lefty (a la the Edwards bloggers or the stuff about wanting Cheney dead) this will come to mind, but only if it’s really played up now. I know what you’re thinking: it will be. But you’re wrong: it’ll be remembered only by those who want to remember it. After all, Coulter has said such things before — did that get mentioned during the recent flaps over Edwards’ bloggers and so on? No. Nor will this be remembered next time, if we continue to treat it with a sort of world-weary *sigh* rather than white-hot outrage. Scream about it — then it will be remembered. Why does our side underplay the amount of anger it has a right to? What possible advantage is there in that? Are they worried Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity will call them “sissies” for defending homosexuals?
March 4th, 2007 at 1:38 pmThis surely is not modern conservatism–it is Ann Coulter just being Ann Coulter.
Comment by 20wordsorless — March 4, 2007 @ 1:33 pm
Well, while you’re being paid to do work and are here instead, why don’t you waste more of your client/customer’s money and prove it…
March 4th, 2007 at 1:41 pmWhy does our side underplay the amount of anger it has a right to?
Comment by ruttiger — March 4, 2007 @ 1:38 pm
Excellent point. I completely agree with your post.
I see liberals tell other liberals that it isn’t nice to play hardball, that we should ignore these people so they will go away, and that we shouldn’t get angry. I’m not sure why either… Because, clearly, that hasn’t been working so well for us in this arena…
March 4th, 2007 at 1:44 pm20words, the point is that when Ann is Ann, conservatives just love it. I’m sure you heard the round of applause and hearty laughter after she made her comment. By their reaction, I would have to say that her point of view must be common among today’s conservatives. It’s predictable. Some a-hole on a liberal blog makes a stray remark about Cheney and all we hear is that the left is “filled with hate.” Mention Ann Coulter’s vile remarks and it’s just Ann being Ann. Nothing to see here. And certainly no conclusions should be drawn about conservative values!
March 4th, 2007 at 1:46 pmYou godless liberals better not smear me. I know what America is about. I speak for America. You’re all just a bunch of fags anyway.
March 4th, 2007 at 1:53 pmEverytime there is something big the government wants to fold into a new cycle they give Ann Coulter a call and green light her saying something stupid. Time to do some digging to see what they are trying to hide.
March 4th, 2007 at 1:58 pmI used to be best friends with a log cabin kweer who had all her books. This was b4 I was involved in politics and knew any better. I often wonder what he thinks now about this broad.
March 4th, 2007 at 2:05 pmI think we’re heading toward a situation where over an over Republicans ask themselves “is this what my party does? Call prez candidates ‘homo’?”
This surely is not modern conservatism . . . . Comment by 20wordsorless
She was speaking at the Conservative Political Action Conference. It’s pathetic what passes for humor among conservatives. Just call someone whatever horrible name you can dream up, then say “it was a joke.” What a bunch of jackasses (and I’m not joking).
March 4th, 2007 at 2:14 pmThe more I cogitate on this, the more I think it proves how weak Coulter’s whole shtick is. I mean, seriously, “Johnny is a faggot!” What is she, 12?
What really is creepy, though, is how much adulation she’s given by some conservatives for being “outspoken” and “courageous” when most of what comes out of her mouth is just, well, it’s stupid. “Greenies all want to destroy civilization and light their rooms with candles.” She’s so far off the deep end that it’s sad no one has thrown her a nice big rock to hold onto.
March 4th, 2007 at 2:31 pmWow! All these threads on my hero Ann Coulter? She’s practically taken over this blog! I’ve missed her on all the talk shows lately. Thanks to all the publicity you liberals have given her lately because of your hatred for this women she’ll probably be back on the circuit non stop! Thank you liberals!
March 4th, 2007 at 2:38 pmI just checked in here to see what people are saying about “you know who”. I won’t even mention her name. I’m sooo glad to see so few comments. The less attention we give her the better. That’s it for me!! Bye.
March 4th, 2007 at 2:41 pmAC ain’t pulling the numbers she used too, michael. The “Angry Neocon Bitch” phenomena has seen it’s days buddy.
March 4th, 2007 at 2:43 pmNo problem Michael. Next we’ll be sure to start a thread about your other heroes, Heinrich Himmler, John Wayne Gacy and Pol Pot.
March 4th, 2007 at 2:45 pm“The “Angry Neocon Bitch†phenomena has seen it’s days buddy.
Comment by jeff — March 4, 2007 @ 2:43 pm”
Really? Wait until she releases her next book!
March 4th, 2007 at 2:46 pm“Nice try, Ann…you’re still a bigot.
Comment by Xenon — March 4, 2007 @ 1:13 pm”
Ah the typical liberal response when they don’t agree with someone, call them a bigot!
March 4th, 2007 at 2:50 pm“I refuse to be associated with any value system”
Comment by Jess Wundrun — March 4, 2007 @ 1:23 pm
The same can be said for all liberals!
March 4th, 2007 at 2:52 pm“Ann Coulter’s parents must have really neglected her as a child. What a pathetic, insecure woman.
Comment by Laura — March 4, 2007 @ 1:32 pm”
Pathetic? Insecure? You have to be kidding?
March 4th, 2007 at 2:53 pmMen who buy AC books are men who also wear women’s underwear. I was in a flea market yesterday in east Texas. You know, the kind of place where you buy old cast iron cookware and tarctor parts and such. I happened upon a booth where these freaks were making woodan placards used on front doors, etc. Get a load of this one:
I found my sweet Prince and he’s my Daddy
Yes. It’s real. I think I’ll go back and get a jpeg next week. Anyway, those “Prince/Daddys” are the ones buyin AC books.
March 4th, 2007 at 3:39 pm“Yes. It’s real. I think I’ll go back and get a jpeg next week. Anyway, those “Prince/Daddys†are the ones buyin AC books.
Comment by jeff — March 4, 2007 @ 3:39 pm”
My my my, is that the most intelligent thing you can say to counter Coulter?
March 4th, 2007 at 3:45 pmWhat do you want me to say? “Edwards ain’t a homo?” lol you need to recenter the gist of your AC thing you got going on there big tex lol.
March 4th, 2007 at 3:51 pmTell me, michael, are you your daughter’s Prince? Got one of those virginal chastity ring promise thingys do ya? lol
Ah the typical liberal response when they don’t agree with someone, call them a bigot!
Comment by michael — March 4, 2007 @ 2:50 pm
Or call people bigots who are actually bigots — people who call others “ragheads” or “faggots” or suggest that Timothy McVeigh should have blown up the NY Times building.
March 4th, 2007 at 3:52 pmnice, gummitch. Here’s a good one: Terrorists destroy lives. Vigilantes destroy Democracies.
March 4th, 2007 at 3:56 pmI don’t believe that this harpy would ever go way in the event that she gets ignored bydecent thinking people. She still has legions of scumbag cretins hanging on her every word.
I think the John Edwards campaign took a step in the right direction. We need to follow up by haranguing the networks for even showning her hateful, skanky visage. She needs to be put into the company of her own kind: raving nazis. Her followers need to be mocked, riduculed, and ostracized.
March 4th, 2007 at 4:08 pm“Or call people bigots who are actually bigots — people who call others “ragheads†or “faggots†or suggest that Timothy McVeigh should have blown up the NY Times building.
Comment by gummitch — March 4, 2007 @ 3:52 pm”
That’s being a bigot?
March 4th, 2007 at 4:10 pmWhose lives do terrorists destroy? What Democracys do Vigilantes destroy? You liberals don’t give facts.
March 4th, 2007 at 4:12 pmyes, michael, THAT’s being a bigot. Did you go to school at all?
March 4th, 2007 at 4:14 pmI fail to understand why outlets such as Think Progress continue to give this woman the publicity she so desperately wants and needs to continue making money. Let her fade away into obscurity, please!
March 4th, 2007 at 4:21 pmAh the typical liberal response when they don’t agree with someone, call them a bigot!
Comment by michael — March 4, 2007 @ 2:50 pm
And we also call people bigots when they try to defend other bigots.
When someone uses such derogatory language towards another person, how do you figure that they are not a bigot? Is there some way that you can call someone any of your friend Ann’s favorite words and not be a bigot?
March 4th, 2007 at 4:23 pmWe have to turn this stuff back onto the conservative party to get them on record reguard this inane and useless bigotry. Example: Unofficial conservative spokesperson, Ann Coulter said…Proper framing puts the onus on them to reject thier own.
March 4th, 2007 at 4:26 pmSo she wants it in writing from Giuliana that he is ‘willing to bomb Iran….,she said also:’WE KIND OF LIKE THAT….
The cheerleaders at it again.
March 4th, 2007 at 4:29 pmWe have to turn this stuff back onto the conservative party to get them on record reguard this inane and useless bigotry. Example: Unofficial conservative spokesperson, Ann Coulter said…Proper framing puts the onus on them to reject thier own. Comment by Jennifer
Excellent idea and…
she said also:’WE KIND OF LIKE THAT…. Comment by tarazan (highlight added)
Coulter gives the opening.
March 4th, 2007 at 4:37 pm#33 is NOT me.
March 4th, 2007 at 4:50 pm“yes, michael, THAT’s being a bigot”
Explain?
March 4th, 2007 at 4:51 pmEither Edwards is a faggot or he is not a faggot. I hope he is not, because being a sex perverted faggot is a despicable and disgusting thing to be.
March 4th, 2007 at 4:58 pmRomans 1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections:
for even their women did change the natural use into that which is
against nature:
:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the
woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men
working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that
recompence of their error which was meet.
SAY THIS PRAYER: Dear Jesus, I am a sinner and am headed to eternal hell because of my sins. I believe you died on the cross to take away my sins and to take me to heaven. Jesus, I ask you now to come into my heart and take away my sins and give me eternal life. http://www.armyofgod.com
“I fail to understand why outlets such as Think Progress continue to give this woman the publicity she so desperately wants and needs to continue making money. Let her fade away into obscurity, please!
Comment by Eric Hundman — March 4, 2007 @ 4:21 pm”
Because you liberals can’t help yourselves. You are all drawn to her!
March 4th, 2007 at 5:01 pmRev Spitz,
You are a sick f*ck.
March 4th, 2007 at 5:02 pm“When someone uses such derogatory language towards another person, how do you figure that they are not a bigot? Is there some way that you can call someone any of your friend Ann’s favorite words and not be a bigot?
Comment by neildeal — March 4, 2007 @ 4:23 pm”
And how about all those terrible comments made every day on the internet about our President and Vice President?
March 4th, 2007 at 5:03 pm“Coulter gives the opening.
Comment by PatrioticLiberalChristian(PLC) — March 4, 2007 @ 4:37 pm”
And are you man enough to take advantage of her? I don’t think so!
March 4th, 2007 at 5:05 pm“yes, michael, THAT’s being a bigotâ€
Explain?
Comment by michael
Man, you’re as thick as a brick dude:
Bigot: a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices.
Coulter, Malkin, and YOU?
March 4th, 2007 at 5:05 pmAnd how about all those terrible comments made every day on the internet about our President and Vice President?
michael,
It doesn’t count if they’re true.
God
March 4th, 2007 at 5:06 pmAh yes,
I believe that I’ve see that same post from Rev Spitz on other sites. Spam?
The perfect example of why the separation of church and state is so necessary.
March 4th, 2007 at 5:08 pm“Coulter, Malkin, and YOU?
Comment by wake-n-bake — March 4, 2007 @ 5:05 pm”
Wow! What incredible company! You forgot Laura and Kelly!
March 4th, 2007 at 5:11 pmaRMYoFgOD?
Now THAT’S funny. Makes about as much sense as “newborns for abortion”.
March 4th, 2007 at 5:12 pmAnd how about all those terrible comments made every day on the internet about our President and Vice President?
Comment by michael — March 4, 2007 @ 5:03 pm
Can you not decipher the distinction between terrible comments made about specific people based on their actual behavior and terrible comments about entire groups of people based on nothing but prejudice?
“one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance “
March 4th, 2007 at 5:12 pm“The perfect example of why the separation of church and state is so necessary.
Comment by neildeal — March 4, 2007 @ 5:08 pm”
Perfect example? Huh? Want to tell us just what that perfect example is?
March 4th, 2007 at 5:14 pm“Coulter gives the opening.
Comment by PatrioticLiberalChristian(PLC) — March 4, 2007 @ 4:37 pmâ€
And are you man enough to take advantage of her? I don’t think so!
Comment by michael
I am man enough to NOT take advantage of any female, in the manner which you imply by taking my statement completely out of context. Ann Coulter’s comments suggest that she speaks for the Republican party, or at least the neocon wing. Other Republicans should be asked if they support her hate-speech.
“I don’t think so WELL” should be your motto.
March 4th, 2007 at 5:14 pm““one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance “
Comment by gummitch — March 4, 2007 @ 5:12 pm”
That’s her opinion….and mine!
March 4th, 2007 at 5:15 pmaRMYoFgOD?
Comment by wake-n-bake
That’s not my army.
March 4th, 2007 at 5:16 pm“I am man enough to NOT take advantage of any female, in the manner which you imply”
A comment was made about Ann giving you an opening (implying verbal). And I asked if you were man enough to take advantage of that opening? My money is on Coulter any day!
March 4th, 2007 at 5:18 pm“Ann Coulter’s comments suggest that she speaks for the Republican party, or at least the neocon wing”
Yes she does!
March 4th, 2007 at 5:20 pm#53
Michael, if you can’t understand my statement, you need to go live at a place where they’ll wipe your behind for you and keep matches and sharp objects out of your reach.
Or maybe you should go to a cult deprogrammer you poor authoritarian servile man.
March 4th, 2007 at 5:34 pmI bet there are some nice Princely Daddies at Spitz’s church 4 sure. Thinking about all that hot gay sex all the time lol.
March 4th, 2007 at 5:36 pmSpitz just anothet powerless Pharisee doomed to Hell for his hypocrisy and hate filled covetous soul wanting to be seen and heard of men and Gods.
“Michael, if you can’t understand my statement, you need to go live at a place where they’ll wipe your behind for you
Comment by neildeal — March 4, 2007 @ 5:34 pm”
Is this the very best you have in support of your very stupid statement? You can’t back it up, can you?
March 4th, 2007 at 5:47 pmA comment was made about Ann giving you an opening (implying verbal). And I asked if you were man enough to take advantage of that opening? My money is on Coulter any day! Comment by michael — March 4, 2007 @ 5:18 pm
Did you make that bravado macho comment from under your desk at home, the way you fought vietnam from under a desk in DC?
March 4th, 2007 at 5:48 pmhttp://www.tarpley.net/bushb.htm
George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography — by Webster G. Tarpley & Anton Chaitkin
————————————————————–
I encourage everyone to download and read this free book about George HW Bush. It explains how George Junior grew up as well as all of his misgivings then and now.
It is available in .htm and .zip format
EVERY dirty little secret is revealed. It is a GREAT recent hist
March 4th, 2007 at 5:58 pm“Did you make that bravado macho comment from under your desk at home, the way you fought vietnam from under a desk in DC?
Comment by ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus — March 4, 2007 @ 5:48 pm”
Huh? This has something to do with Coulter? Of course it doesn’t but it is a classic example of liberal debating skills. When you have nothing intelligent to say, act like a child.
March 4th, 2007 at 6:00 pm“EVERY dirty little secret is revealed. It is a GREAT recent hist
Comment by rachel kinnardi — March 4, 2007 @ 5:58 pm”
Really? Want to share one of them with us?
March 4th, 2007 at 6:01 pmHuh? This has something to do with Coulter? Of course it doesn’t but it is a classic example of liberal debating skills. When you have nothing intelligent to say, act like a child. Comment by michael — March 4, 2007 @ 6:00 pm
Huh? Your posts never has anything to do with the thread. Of course not, it is a classic example of the lack of conservative debating skills. When you have nothing intelligent to say, act like a child.
Ah the life of michael, the Chickenhawk perpetual child!
March 4th, 2007 at 6:03 pmColuter-GEIST the MAN in BIMBO’s clothing! A FAGGOT BY ANY OTHER NAME WOULD SMELL AS FOETID AS he/she/it, namely Ann Couter-GEIST! Coulter-GEIST is A FAG-HAG as well as a FAGGOT he/she/it-self, so why he/she/it would OPEN he/she/it’s VILE YAP-TRAP and EXPOSE he/she/itself to RIDICULE and JEERING, IS BEYOND ME!
March 4th, 2007 at 6:05 pmThere once was a VILE SKANK named Ann
Coulter-GEIST, whose INSIDIOUS plan
Was to LIE, Spout INNUENDO and DEFAME,
This SHITTY BITCH KNOWS NO SHAME!!!!!
So they CUT he/she/its’ BALLS and fried them in a PAN!!!!!
This UNSPEAKABLE PUKE-FACED C*NT SHOULD BE STRANGLED WITH HER OWN STRINGY PEROXIDED HAIR AND THROWN TO WILD DOGS TO BE FEASTED UPON LIKE THE HORRENDOUS JEZEBEL SHE IS!!!!!
Jezebel Ann Coulter-GEIST was a tasty gal(?)
Full of vitamins A to Z!
He/She/It ended up as DOGGIE-TURDS
THAT THEY SWEPT INTO THE SEA!!!!! (AND THEREBY FULFILLING THE BIBLICAL PROPHECY OF JEZEBEL!!!!!) HAH!
“Ah the life of michael, the Chickenhawk perpetual child!
Comment by ValiantVenusGrewFromUranus — March 4, 2007 @ 6:03 pm”
You might want to visit the Cheney thread and show everybody just how smart you are?
March 4th, 2007 at 6:08 pmWhat’s there to back up you extremist tool? It’s a statement that praises the merits of the separation of church and state by pointing out the insane views of a religious figure as an example. It doesn’t require me to present data to you.
There you go. You’re wrong. Take care now.
March 4th, 2007 at 6:21 pm“What’s there to back up you extremist tool? It’s a statement that praises the merits of the separation of church and state by pointing out the insane views of a religious figure as an example”
Don’t mean to make you look foolish, you do it to yourself! Here’s what you said:
“Ah yes,
I believe that I’ve see that same post from Rev Spitz on other sites. Spam?
The perfect example of why the separation of church and state is so necessary.
Comment by neildeal — March 4, 2007 @ 5:08 pm”
The separation of church and state is so necessary because of what this person posted here? Now do you see what I mean? You liberals make such dumb posts and I’m here to keep you honest!
March 4th, 2007 at 6:30 pmNo Princess, because of who he is and what he posted.
There you go. You’re wrong. Take care now.
March 4th, 2007 at 6:37 pm“No Princess, because of who he is and what he posted.
There you go. You’re wrong. Take care now.
Comment by neildeal — March 4, 2007 @ 6:37 pm”
Let’s assume he is a man of the cloth, which I doubt, you bring up separation of church and state to his comment? It has nothing to do with it! Why do you make it so easy for me?
March 4th, 2007 at 6:46 pmCOULTER: “C’mon, it was a joke…”
********************************
ENOUGH with the “joke” excuse already — there’s nothing even remotely funny or humorous about the spite and vitriol which comes out of this woman’s mouth on a regular basis. The only people laughing are the ones who secretly believe (or at least want to believe) that everything she says is true because it only serves to confirm their prejudices — which means, of course, that they don’t consider it a joke any more than she probably does. I don’t buy into the idea that she’s only doing this as a game or a stunt — and even if this were the case, the fact nevertheless remains that more than a few people take her seriously. Maybe this is partly because of the emphasis that all my psychology professors put on Freudian theory when I was in college, but I don’t believe that mean-spirited remarks like this are ever intended as anything other than a covert attack — a form of emotional guerrilla warfare. If Coulter truly had the guts that people credit her with having, she wouldn’t bother trying to “clarify” herself — she would admit publicly that this is how she genuinely feels and that she sees no need to take back or soften anything that she says. If she did that, she might actually have some degree of integrity — but the trite “it was a joke” excuse is nothing more than an attempt to avoid the consequences of her own remarks (and I thought conservatives believed in taking personal responsibility!). In short, she can dish it out but she can’t take it — and the fact that she resorts to the lame “it was a joke” excuse proves it.
March 4th, 2007 at 7:16 pm“there’s nothing even remotely funny or humorous about the spite and vitriol which comes out of this woman’s mouth on a regular basis”
I consider it hilarious! It’s nothing in comparison to the spite and vitriol leveled by you liberals against W & Cheney!
“The only people laughing are the ones who secretly believe (or at least want to believe) that everything she says is true because it only serves to confirm their prejudices — which means, of course, that they don’t consider it a joke any more than she probably does”
Most of what she says is true! The difference is we know when she is serious and when she’s not. This is classic Coulter. She’s so good at what she does that she’s got you lefties running in circles!
March 4th, 2007 at 7:46 pmJesus, I ask you now to come into my heart and take away my sins and give me eternal life.
Comment by Rev. Donald Spitz — March 4, 2007 @ 4:58 pm
You are EXACTLY why there is the First Amendment to the Constitution…
So, I hear they found Jesus’s bones in a box… How you dealing with that dose of reality?
March 4th, 2007 at 7:53 pmShe’s so good at what she does that she’s got you lefties running in circles!
Comment by michael — March 4, 2007 @ 7:46 pm
She’s good at making me program my television to skip FAUX “news”. That voice of hers makes nails on a chalk board sound like a first rate symphony orchestra…
March 4th, 2007 at 7:55 pmmicheal, put a flag over Trannie Coulter’s face and do him for old glory. Surely, there is never a better causus belli FOR flag burning.
I would not touch Coulter with a 10 foot dildo.
I STILL have $20 that says Trannie Coulter’s Adam’s apple is larger than her cup size.
March 4th, 2007 at 7:56 pmComment by michael — March 4, 2007 @ 7:46 pm
Nothing you’ve said disputes or contradicts my argument, Michael — in fact, if anything, what you’ve said only confirms it.
March 4th, 2007 at 8:10 pm“Nothing you’ve said disputes or contradicts my argument, Michael — in fact, if anything, what you’ve said only confirms it.
Comment by Bluestocking — March 4, 2007 @ 8:10 pm”
Excuse me? Your post didn’t say much of anything and my 2 responses to it were very generous!
March 4th, 2007 at 8:16 pmBecause you liberals can’t help yourselves. You are all drawn to her!
Comment by michael
So why is Anne umarried, dateless and childless?
If she is so attractive to conservatives why aren’t they beating her door down?
heh.
March 4th, 2007 at 9:22 pmShe’s so good at what she does that she’s got you lefties running in circles!
Comment by michael
I hear the teenage kids at the park down the street make better vulgar remarks than Anne.
March 4th, 2007 at 9:24 pmYa know Michael, I have read many of your posts. Not a one of them contains a fact, only question marks.
Why don’t you post facts Michael?
March 4th, 2007 at 9:25 pmI mean Michael, Anne must be pretty unattractive (mentally and physuically) if even a liberal won’t date her? Right?
March 4th, 2007 at 9:27 pmExcuse me? -Michael
There is no excuse for you.
March 4th, 2007 at 9:29 pmSorry about michael.
His mother couldn’t figure out which end of the hanger to use.
He comes by his stupity honestly.
March 4th, 2007 at 9:39 pmSorry about Michael
His mother couldn’t figure out which end of the hanger to use.
Comment by God
Hilarious! LMFAO!
March 4th, 2007 at 10:12 pmThanks, Uncle Ho.
Shhhh……
Heh.
March 4th, 2007 at 10:13 pmShhhh……
Comment by Zooey — March 4, 2007 @ 10:13 pm
You just have to out yourself… again :)
March 4th, 2007 at 10:23 pm[…] by the way, when asked to clarify her comments, she said, “C’mon, it was a joke. I would never insult gays by suggesting that […]
March 4th, 2007 at 10:28 pmOnly to Uncle Ho….
March 4th, 2007 at 10:32 pmOnly to Uncle Ho.
comment by Mistress Z
Sounds kinky. Are you a dominatrix? sounds like it. no offense.
March 4th, 2007 at 10:38 pmYou’ll just have to find a way to find out, Uncle Ho.
March 4th, 2007 at 10:42 pmMistress Z; I’m rather conventional sexually. straight, not into whips, clamps, handcuffs, etc.. That stuff is too far out for my taste. sorry to disappoint, but that’s life.
March 4th, 2007 at 11:02 pmSo you did find out. :)
You feel something pulling on your leg…?
March 4th, 2007 at 11:06 pmSorry to mess with you, Uncle Ho. It’s been a long week.
March 4th, 2007 at 11:07 pmIt’s been a long week.
Tell me about it. I’ve had a basketful of stuff for the last several days too. Saturday work(slammed), midweek company meeting & not getting home until late, and a wedding/reception out of town yesterday.
March 4th, 2007 at 11:28 pmI can be a real ass sometimes. :}
March 4th, 2007 at 11:36 pmZooey; wanna take a guess how I can be at times?
March 4th, 2007 at 11:43 pmI can only imagine sweetness, unicorns, rainbows, and a boonie hat.
March 4th, 2007 at 11:48 pmAnd probably a hell of a temper.
Oops, sorry, that last one was me. Damn, I always out myself. :)
March 4th, 2007 at 11:49 pmGod; my hell of a temper probably came from my tour of duty with the marines. I have a really baaaad sense of humor about getting shot at. Pisses me off to no end.
March 4th, 2007 at 11:52 pmTis the bewitching hour and I will turn into something if I don’t go to bed. g’night all
March 5th, 2007 at 12:02 amDon’t blame you one bit, Uncle Ho.
You have good reason.
I need to stop impersonating God, I’m gonna get struck by lightning.
March 5th, 2007 at 12:03 amThis broad is completely out there. Her daddy may have been a “union buster” but apparently didn’t spend much time teaching Ms. F’ing Smartmouth much of anything at all. Things like “cooth” and “decorum” weren’t part of the social circles @ Cornell or Mich.Law. You can tell she thinks her “doo-doo” don’t stink..probably went to Serendipity for dessert every saturday pm, huh. Stuck up bitch. Look at the close of her initial J. Edwards remark and you’ll see the excessively intelligent lil’ brat trying to get daddy’s attention(2 no avail). The one that thinks she’s just so damn smart and witty. Probably got a right-wing female shock jock deal ready to roll with Murdoch any second…crazy like fox dis beesh. Like i tell all m’boys “personality counts 4 a lot”..She’s actually kinda’ fiiii-nnne, but alas nothing attractive b/t those ears i’m afraid. —”daddy, would those be chin-nuts?”…wms07
March 5th, 2007 at 4:41 amOh no, people. PLEASE, PLEASE, go to another blog and discuss something that really matters. I’m so disappointed to see so many additional posts here! This michael is just goading you. Let him scream into the wind.
March 5th, 2007 at 8:56 amShe needs to practice what she preaches, go home and fix me a g!d!mned turkey pot pie and press my clothes while I have a beer and watch the game. Doesn’t she understand that in the Bible and in Conservative politics, there is no place for a woman other than to stay home, do housework, and get barefoot and pregnant. She’s a walking hypocrite. The bible and the Koran have something in common…they both basically state that women are $h!t so Ann must really be an Atheist after all. Politics ain’ta no place for a woman. Now I must return to porking of my sister!
March 5th, 2007 at 9:19 am