Don’t call me a traitor or a neocon,I like Stewart,but I find Colberts show basically unwatchable.
Too hyperactive.

You guys talk about the mystical Universal Free Health Care for all thing everyday. Why aren’t your leaders in congress not putting a bill out there to be voted on?

i do believe this roger is trolling for blog-bites…

hard to imagine why an anonymous opinion would hold any weight, but these cons are not fair players, nor logical…

“She is the only Democrat who can lose this next election”

“a lot of lefties will just not vote, washing their hands of the whole thing, and a lot of others will vote Green…”

Where to start? Let me begin by admitting that Hillary isn’t my favorite candidate in the bunch. Clinton was the one who wanted universal healthcare for all Americans. The fact that it didn’t happen is not her fault – it’s republicans, the media and the insurance industry who are responsible for that.

In almost every head-to-head poll with repubs, Hillary comes out about even or ahead. Others are consistently behind. So, I’m not sure where you get the non-electable stuff.

Green Party????!!!! So I take it you think liberals will make the same mistake as in 2000 and view Hillary as indistinguishable from the Repub nominee. Get serious.

What I find amazing about most of this Hillary-hating is that usually the person who hates Hillary, likes Obama, but Obama’s positions are no more liberal on any issue and, in fact, he’s more conservative than Hillary on some issues.

Here’s what I think this is about: a bunch of right-wing creeps and corporate shills have been dishing out crap about Hillary for years now and many people have bought into it whether or not they know it. If you have an unreasonable, visceral hatred of Hillary, these creeps have won.

Bruce, I realize that bashing Hillary is great sport for conservatives and liberals alike, but let’s at least get our facts straight. As early as 2003, Hillary was telling audiences that if she had known then what she knew now, there would have never even been a vote and, if there were, she and most of her Democratic lawmakers would have voted no. And, for the umpteenth time, what she and other lawmakers voted for was to give the president the authority to go to war AS A LAST RESORT and with a fresh UN RESOLUTION in hand. Moreover, the agreement included the stipulation that Bush had to come back every 60 days with updates on the search for WMD’s. I guess what amazes me the most is that people have somehow been hypnotized into a state where they’re demanding apologies and explanations from Democrats about the war in Iraq. The only people who should be explaining and apologizing about Iraq are repubs.

http://www.carolinajournal.com/exclusives/display_exclusive.html?id=3848

How can you have respect for him after that. What a hypocrit. Just get Gore to run. He is my #1 choice followed by Obama. Either one wins in a landslide.

Hillary Clinton gets by on the fact that she is a fund-raising machine and the Democrats, bless them, are not the best and brightest bunch of liberals you will ever see.

She voted for the Iraq War, and was its staunchest supporter right up until it turned inconvenient. She made a big thing about being a conservative, even to the extent of joining forces with voices calling for more stringent censorship in computer games (And let me tell you, I know a lot more guys who quote the Godfather as a source of morality, then quote Grand Theft Auto San Andreas.)

The left doesn’t like her, because she has stabbed the left in the back repeatedly, and shown no concern for America’s policies, only what was expedient for her at the time. She isn’t Mrs Clinton when one talks politics, she is Mrs Lieberman.

And the right doesn’t like her because she is female, and a Democrat.

So basically she has to win over the centre, and the centre only really knows that the Republicans really don’t like her. The Left probably will compromise and vote for her over a Republican, but a lot of lefties will just not vote, washing their hands of the whole thing, and a lot of others will vote Green. The Right, won’t compromise even if she develops stigmata.

She is the only Democrat who can lose this next election, and chances are the Democrats, because they listen to strategists who have repeatedly lost them elections, will put her in.

They should go for Edwards or Obama.

Of course, if Gibson still wants to cover the Anna Nicole crap, he can go to the Bahamas dig out her grave get into her coffin and just get busy. Hey, a little necrophilia never hurts a RepubliKKKan. Unless he/she gets caught.

I’m not sure what nationally syndicated means in this case. But if you mean broadcast then you may be right and sadly that says more about the US viewing public than how smart Colbert’s show is.

Come on. That’s extremely short sighted. You obviously don’t watch his show or know how loyal his following is. Besides having a mascot named after him in Canada and a bridge named after him in Hungary and a national prayer day for him (I know, shocking) his show is climbing past The Daily Show in ratings. His first show got 1.13 million viewers on cable. You don’t give the man enough credit.

**smiling sweetly**

Have to agree with you there Roger.
Hillary changes whichever way she “percieves” the political winds are blowing.
I won’t be voting for her because she is a DLC shill. She is a Republican lite, like her buddy Lieberman

Good luck with that, it’s a tough one. :)