Five papers
By on Mar 8th, 2007 at 7:31 pm
Five papers
have now dropped Ann Coulter, and the president of the Universal Press Syndicate is under mounting pressure to stop distributing her columns altogether. Greg Sargent is tracking the latest developments.
UPDATE: Media Matters has a full list of newspapers that carry Coulter’s column. Is Ann Coulter in your town?
View Most Popular
Advertisement
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Afghanistan
Bachmann
Beck
Boehner
Business
Civil Rights
Congress
Corporate Ethics
Dobbs
Economy
Education
Election
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Gingrich
Global Warming
Health Care
Hoffman
Immigration
International Relations
Iraq
Justice
LGBT
Lieberman
Limbaugh
Media
Military
O'Reilly
Obama
Palin
Pelosi
Politics
Race
Radical Right
Religion
Sports
Steele
Stimulus
Tea Parties
Tea Party
Terrorism
Veterans
Women's Rights
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
Reports
In-depth studies on select topics
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
ArchivesBlog Roll
Good….Nothing work’s better on the evil rich except removing some of their sources of fund’s..The other thing that work’s is showing the vast majority are tired of bad taste bigotry and slandering another for personal gain…Blessings
March 8th, 2007 at 7:36 pmWho’d of thunk it?
A big mouth CAN shoot itself in the foot.
March 8th, 2007 at 7:37 pmA big mouth CAN shoot itself in the foot.
Comment by AckSyn JAckSyn
Heh.
March 8th, 2007 at 7:41 pmAn Coulter is really under your skin. Must be triggering some complex or you wouldn’t be reacting with such a high girly voice. Do you think for a minute that any of your shrillness upsets Coulter? Her fans are rooting her on and you will help her to sell her books.
March 8th, 2007 at 7:43 pmThis won’t hurt her popularity. In fact I didn’t even know her columns were printed in newspapers at all. I’ll still listen to her anyway because she is smart and funny.
March 8th, 2007 at 7:43 pmhey, zooey… it’s been a long while since “ann” has posted here…
March 8th, 2007 at 7:45 pmi wonder how “she” is doing… or am i missing something…
I think fer popularity is growing actually. My fiance isn’t even in to politics and she asked the other day if we could go see Ann speak somewhere.
March 8th, 2007 at 7:45 pmhey, zooey… it’s been a long while since “ann†has posted here…
i wonder how “she†is doing… or am i missing something…
Comment by katy
James hasn’t been around for quite a while. I wish he’d drop in.
March 8th, 2007 at 7:48 pmMy fiance isn’t even in to politics and she asked the other day if we could go see Ann speak somewhere.
Comment by mandolin
That was a good one! Tell another!
Fiance…..heh.
March 8th, 2007 at 7:48 pmHer fans are rooting her on and you will help her to sell her books.
Ya know, I went to Walmart one day when her last book, if it can be called such a thing, came out and no one was buying it. Alot of trees were cut down just so her plagiarism could be printed and stored in some warehouse somewhere.
Do you think for a minute that any of your shrillness upsets Coulter?
Seeing as I am male and don’t have a shrill voice nor do I speak vulgarily, it really doesn’t matter if Anne is upset. You however seem to be a bit irritated about it.
March 8th, 2007 at 7:57 pmCoulter: “He’s a total fag.”
The citizens of Mike Judge’s “Idiocracy”: “You talk like a fag and your sh*t’s all retarded.”
Yeah, Mandolin, she’s real funny. Just like the future citizens of Idiocracy.
March 8th, 2007 at 7:58 pmNo papers in Michigan carry Coultergeist. ^_^
March 8th, 2007 at 7:59 pmI propose we support Ann Coulter and her support of traditional values by using a traditional means to dealing with a foul mouth … by giving her a bar of soap.
Of course we may need one of those large soap on a rope deals judging by the size of her mouth, and at some point when she is not suffering from foot in mouth disease.
March 8th, 2007 at 8:01 pmI’ll still listen to her anyway because she is smart and funny.
So were the three stooges.
March 8th, 2007 at 8:02 pmI’m surprised, only one paper in Idaho carries her column.
March 8th, 2007 at 8:03 pmMy fiance isn’t even in to politics and she asked the other day if we could go see Ann speak somewhere.
Comment by mandolin
Your right Zooey. This is funny.
Anne attracts people who know little or nothing about politics but think that by listening to someone regurgitate funny words such as ‘faggot’ they might learn about politics.
Anne is not doing you or your girlfriend any good mandolin except creating controversy while complex legislation and pork spending is stealing your precious tax dollars right out of your pocket.
Now thats funny!
March 8th, 2007 at 8:06 pmThings you might not want to have in your resume…
“I have an excellent track record, although I am not a horse.”
“Marital status: single. Unmarried. Unengaged. Uninvolved. No commitments.”
“I am loyal to my employer at all costs… Please feel free to respond to my resume on my office voice mail.”
“My goal is to be a meteorologist. But since I possess no training in Meteorology, I suppose I should try stock brokerage.”
“I have lurnt Word Perfect 6.0 computor and spreadsheet pogroms.”
“Am a perfectionist and rarely if if ever forget details.”
“Received a plague for Salesperson of the Year.”
“Wholly responsible for two (2) failed financial institutions.”
“Reason for leaving last job: maturity leave.”
“Failed bar exam with relatively high grades.”
“It’s best for employers that I not work with people.”
“Let’s meet, so you can ‘ooh’ and ‘aah’ over my experience.”
“I was working for my mom until she decided to move.”
“I procrastinate, especially when the task is unpleasant.”
“Personal interests: donating blood. Fourteen gallons so far.”
“Instrumental in ruining entire operation for a Midwest chainstore.”
“References: none. I’ve left a path of destruction behind me.”
“Note: Please don’t misconstrue my 14 jobs as ‘job-hopping’. I have never quit a job.”
“The company made me a scapegoat, just like my three previous employers.”
“Marital status: often. Children: various.”
“Finished eighth in class of ten.”
These lines reputedly came from Military Performance Appraisals:
Bright as Alaska in December.
Got into the gene pool while the lifeguard wasn’t watching.
A photographic memory but with the lens cover glued on.
It’s hard to believe that he beat out 1,000,000 other sperm.
Gates are down, the lights are flashing, but the train isn’t coming.
He’s so dense, light bends around him.
A room temperature IQ.
Got a full 6-pack, but lacks the plastic thingy to hold it all together.
A gross ignoramus — 144 times worse than an ordinary ignoramus.
If he were any more stupid, he’d have to be watered twice a week.
These apparently come from corporate Performance Evaluations:
“This young lady has delusions of adequacy.”
“I would not allow this employee to breed.”
“When she opens her mouth, it seems that this is only to change whichever foot was previously in there.”
“This associate is really not so much of a has-been, but more of a definitely won’t be.”
“Since my last report, this employee has reached rock bottom and has started to dig.”
“Works well when under constant supervision and cornered like a rat in a trap.”
“This employee is depriving a village of an idiot.”
“This employee should go far and the sooner he starts, the better.”
“He sets low personal standards and then consistently fails to achieve them.”
March 8th, 2007 at 8:07 pmRachel where did you find my resume? =)
March 8th, 2007 at 8:11 pmRachel where did you find my resume? =)
Comment by AckSyn JAckSyn
Oy. Ya know, resumes can be “punched up.” :)
Rachel, don’t post this on every thread. Thanks.
March 8th, 2007 at 8:14 pmThings you might not want to have in your resume…
Heres another;
March 8th, 2007 at 8:17 pmI read Anne Coulter while listening to Rush Limbaugh and hope that you hire me as a spokesperson for your company.
Comment by rachel kinnardi — March 8, 2007 @ 8:07 pm
What did I tell you, rachel?
If you’re going to cut-n-paste giant blocks of text from other sources, at least have the common decency to credit said sources.
Or are you now going to claim you’re Christopher Browne, in addition to being Stan Goff and Arthur Silber?
Folks, please check here to see some of the sources of rachel’s erstwhile loquaciousness.
March 8th, 2007 at 8:18 pmI’m surprised, only one paper in Idaho carries her column.
Comment by Zooey
People in Idaho are much smarter than those here in Texas. =)
March 8th, 2007 at 8:20 pmPeople in Idaho are much smarter than those here in Texas. =)
Comment by AckSyn JAckSyn
Not really. There are just fewer of us — and we’re quiet. :-D
March 8th, 2007 at 8:23 pmThere goes free speech.Bet her next book will be a NYT bestseller
March 8th, 2007 at 8:23 pmOlbermann Watch is back online.Learn the truths though the may lies olbermann tells.
March 8th, 2007 at 8:26 pmWhat goes around, comes around. Since her writting efforts seem to be at an impasse, maybe Ann should open up a fast-food, Mexican drive-through. Serving day-old, stale, pink taco supremes seems to be her specialite.
March 8th, 2007 at 8:30 pmphil sez:
How do you figure? Please explain how her right to free speech is being infringed.
You’re on. From this recent trend, it looks like the masses are finally figuring out that Coulter is just a poisonous little b*tch with no redeeming qualities.
March 8th, 2007 at 8:30 pmAnd nothing in the SF Bay Area either, biiiiig surprise!
March 8th, 2007 at 8:30 pmAnne Coulter sucks! And it’s becoming well-known apparently.
Hi Zooey! I was computerless for five days and it’s a whole new slew of items, what fun. Like Xmas!
Writing efforts seem to be at a impasse?? Last book was a 1 NYT best seller!!
March 8th, 2007 at 8:32 pmAh for the good old days when we wouldn’t have to go through things like this and people like Ann Coulter would be declared insane and sent to a gulag. For those who think that’s too harsh, I’m sorry. What she says is not true and is evil, and there is no reason why she should have any right to be heard.
/sarc
March 8th, 2007 at 8:33 pmLet’s see…
…testing…
March 8th, 2007 at 8:33 pmhttp://www.uexpress.com/anncoulter/
I just read one of Anns latest stools, ur columns.
Talk about misleading.
Scooter was charged with Perjury and she uses that to defend the addict Limbaugh. The way Anne sees it Libby is innocent because Rush was addicted to ‘back’ pain pills.
March 8th, 2007 at 8:33 pmphil sez:
First of all, it was offline? I hadn’t noticed.
Second, I went and checked it out, and the most recent entry is titled “Four More Years!”.
Man…that’s gotta toast your muffin, huh? ^_^
March 8th, 2007 at 8:34 pm#27 TripMaster Monkey
Likely her next book will be a best seller, but that is because the 30%ers are willing to waste their money on stupidity and garbage.
For some reason they worship her while forgetting that false idols are verboten.
March 8th, 2007 at 8:35 pmHi Zooey! I was computerless for five days and it’s a whole new slew of items, what fun. Like Xmas!
Comment by SKdeA
Hi SKdeA! Five days, oh my god, how did you survive?
Yeah Xmas, a really bad one. :)
Boggles the mind, eh? Are you armed up for the War on Easter?
March 8th, 2007 at 8:36 pmI just read one of Anns latest stools, ur columns.
Comment by AckSyn JAckSyn
Brave soul.
She sort of bounces off the walls, doesn’t she?
March 8th, 2007 at 8:38 pmThis won’t hurt her popularity. In fact I didn’t even know her columns were printed in newspapers at all. I’ll still listen to her anyway because she is smart and funny.
Comment by mandolin
———-
This won’t hurt her popularity. In fact I didn’t even know her columns were printed in newspapers at all. I’ll still listen to her anyway because she is smart and funny.
Comment by mandolin
Personally I think that the public discourse in the US has become very, very ugly. Is this really the sort political commentary that we want in this country? As a child growing up in the 60’s, I never heard this sort of repulsive and hateful rhetoric coming from the political pundits of that time.
We have become an ugly and repulsive country thanks to the likes of Coulter, Limbaugh, Hannity and O’Reilly.
What’s really funny, to me at least, is that I never hear the Democratic party spokesholes talking in this manner. I don’t like Democrats any more than I like Republicans, but at least the Democrats seem to keep it more civil.
March 8th, 2007 at 8:38 pmLast book was a 1 NYT best seller!!
Comment by phil
Which means that a warehouse is full of unsold books. Say isn’t WND (worldnetdaily) giving them away?
March 8th, 2007 at 8:39 pmShe sort of bounces off the walls, doesn’t she?
Comment by Zooey
Indeedly diddly fiddly naybor! The way she tries to tye completely unrelated events together is like boneless chicken, it’s mind boggling.
But that is the ministry attack method.
March 8th, 2007 at 8:41 pmAshenShard sez:
Yes, I’ll admit that Ann has a certain appeal…the people who buy her books are the same people that slow down when passing an accident scene on the highway, hoping to see blood.
Ann’s popularity, like so many of the ‘right-wing icons’ is based soley on pandering to the absolute lowest possible common denominator. I continue to hold out hope that enough of the 30%ers will kick-start enough neurons to see through her manipulative bullsh!t, but the sad fact is America is, by and large, a nation of sheep, and the criminals in the White House, as well as their sycophantic supporters, know this all too well.
March 8th, 2007 at 8:43 pmBut that is the ministry attack method.
Comment by AckSyn JAckSyn
I’m going to guess that means keep the readers off balance, and they’ll thing they’re the stupid ones — afterall, AC has columns in newspapers and books and stuff. :)
March 8th, 2007 at 8:45 pmWe have an ugly and repulsive country thanks to Coulter,Limbaugh,Hannity and O’Reilly.
Good to huff post, media matters, this site and other liberal sites and read the comment sections talk about hate.
Democratics seem to keep it civil.
Ever listen to Air A merica when they were talking about killing Bush?
March 8th, 2007 at 8:46 pmEver listen to Bill Mahr?
What’s the big deal with her comment? Are you offended because you are gay or because you don’t want people to think John Edwards is gay. Is his sexuality that unclear that it’s even an issue? Is there anything wrong with being gay?
March 8th, 2007 at 8:47 pmAre some posts disappearing today?
March 8th, 2007 at 8:49 pmNot that I agree with Ann Coulter, or disagree with the Dixie Chicks…
But wasn’t there an uproar (on this very site) over either a ‘crackdown’ or ‘blacklisting’ or ‘censorship’ of the Dixie Chicks after their trip to England?
…and apparently here we’re ‘listing’ the papers her column is on and ‘blackening out’ those who we manage to get taken off.
…Shouldn’t we be at least somehow worried about a possible double standard? I mean after all, if people don’t want that crap, they can skip over it.
March 8th, 2007 at 8:49 pmEver listen to Air A merica when they were talking about killing Bush?
Comment by phil
Gotta link for that, babe?
March 8th, 2007 at 8:50 pm#40 TripMaster Monkey
I hold no hope for those 30%ers. They are all stuck in their belief that Bush is a demi-god, Ann, Rush and the ditto heads at fox noise are his prophets, and that the Democratic party is Satan spawn.
March 8th, 2007 at 8:50 pmEver listen to Air A merica when they were talking about killing Bush?
Ever listen to Bill Mahr?
Comment by phil
No, no and no.
March 8th, 2007 at 8:51 pmHer fans are rooting her on and you will help her to sell her books.
Comment by Bradway Bennett #4
Hey Braddy,
…her FANS are really outdoing themselves…
…paying exhorbitant prices for…
…”SH*T” that they can’t even read…
March 8th, 2007 at 8:53 pmWhich means that a warehouse is full of unsold books. Say isn’t WND (worldnetdaily) giving them away?
Comment by AckSyn JAckSyn — March 8, 2007 @ 8:39 pm
a caller to sams’ show the other day told about his job at a recycling plant and the pallets of coulter’s last book that he had to shred…
he was happy to do so…
and they weren’t “returns” (without covers)… probably bought by some outfit, just to tilt the sellers numbers…
March 8th, 2007 at 8:55 pm… no! … really…
…
Air America does not talk about killing Bush. Nor do the people who host the programs. Ever hear Hartmann, Rhodes, Maddow, Seder, Press, Flanders?
March 8th, 2007 at 8:55 pmI didn’t think so.
For that matter, Bill Maher never said so either.
Unfortunately as the rightwing bignouths get more desperate commensurate with the exposure of their lies and hypocrisy, they tend to write their own phantom scripts for Air America, and tell their listeners that it’s fact.
The jerks who listen to them believe it and repeat it here.
I see you dopes continue to give Coulter all the press she wants? We thank you!
March 8th, 2007 at 8:56 pmWhat’s the big deal with her comment? Are you offended because you are gay or because you don’t want people to think John Edwards is gay.
Really the word Faggot can mean many things form a pork meatball to a Russian MIG to a bundle of sticks. Edwards is not gay nor a meatball nor a bundle of sticks. Ergo her statement is untrue, a lie.
To use Ann’s logic Libby lied and was charged with obstruction of justice yet he should be pardoned because he lied. Ann apparently thinks lying is somehow acceptable.
I don’t find hypocrisy amusing or smart. Secondly she is an adult and she should act like one instead of a foul mouthed schoolyard kid.
March 8th, 2007 at 8:59 pmYes i have thats why i am pointing it out.For ever rightwing nutt there is a equal left wing nutt. Defference is the liberal media doesn’t report what left wing nutts say.
March 8th, 2007 at 8:59 pmI see you dopes continue to give Coulter all the press she wants? We thank you!
Comment by michael
Ahhhh michael, the debate chickenshit.
March 8th, 2007 at 8:59 pmComment by Marie #44
Marie,
I’ve had posts that don’t show up…
…and when I attempt to re-post them hours later…
…the TP control says it’s a duplicate post…
…lately it really seems like:
a) TP hasn’t worked out the kinks in it’s new software…
or
b) the new software (server) is trying to discourage certain posts/posters…
…either way…
…I wish they’d shore up this site…
March 8th, 2007 at 9:00 pmsee you dopes continue to give Coulter all the press she wants? We thank you!
Comment by michael
Yes, Michael Anns getting dropped from newspapers is good press. And your welcome that Ann will have less people reading her childish taunts.
Say Michael, would you want your kids to talk like Ann?
March 8th, 2007 at 9:01 pmYes i have thats why i am pointing it out.For ever rightwing nutt there is a equal left wing nutt. Defference is the liberal media doesn’t report what left wing nutts say.
Comment by phil
The liberal media myth was debunked long ago. If the media is so liberal, as you think, then why don’t they print what the left wing nutts say and print what the right wing nuts say?
Your logic is baffling.
March 8th, 2007 at 9:07 pmi hate to be mean, so this isn’t mean, if it sounds mean, sorry…
but phil sounds – reads – drunk…
don’t drink and blog!
March 8th, 2007 at 9:09 pmComments made by blog readers are a lot different then those made by public figures.
I’ve listened to Air America a few times and I never heard any mention about killing the President. And I never really watch Bill Maher.
I would appreciate some direct quotes to back up your statements. If you can’t do so, I will have to assume that you are just plain making these things up
March 8th, 2007 at 9:09 pmHi SKdeA! Five days, oh my god, how did you survive?
Yeah Xmas, a really bad one. :)
Boggles the mind, eh? Are you armed up for the War on Easter?
Comment by Zooey — March 8, 2007 @ 8:36 pm
I survived well! I was in Yosemite, performing and dressing up 30s for an event. Hardly any tourists there with snow on the ground, but temps in the 30s! And many, many Maker’s Mark Manhattans!
March 8th, 2007 at 9:09 pmGo War on Easter!!! Kill the Wabbit!
Here’s a letter I emailed to one of the papers on the list. Perhaps I’ll send it to a few more too.
Dear editor,
Thank you for taking the time to read my comments.
Ann Coulter is obviously bigoted and homophobic. But she has a right to her opinion. What bothers me more however is her willingness to use those or any issues to gain notoriety by pure sensationalism. She is clearly not a trustworthy source of opinion, as he opinion is defined by whatever will get her name on the front page to sell books — no matter who she offends or how inaccurate her facts are.
I urge you remove Ann Coulter’s column from your pages, as she is an embarrassment to your otherwise fine newspaper.
Thank you very much,
Paul E. Jackson
March 8th, 2007 at 9:12 pmWell, 5 down, 95 to go.
March 8th, 2007 at 9:12 pmNo liberal media? CBS just hired Kaplan to run CBS news.He is a left wing liberal who slept in Clintons white house,help him deal with the press,, ran fake stories at CNN and Created Olbermann.
March 8th, 2007 at 9:15 pmTheres no liberal media though.
Your logic is baffing.
Rhodes did joke about killing Bush,birds flying into the pentagon, and other hatefull stuff.
Hey Michael I have a great idea, go out to a country western bar and start calling people you know nothing about fags. ya know imitate Ann, and see what happens.
I can assure you they won’t think its funny as they pound the bejeebies out of you.
March 8th, 2007 at 9:16 pmSee if you and others would have listen to air america than they would still be around and have ratings.
March 8th, 2007 at 9:19 pmAnd many, many Maker’s Mark Manhattans!
Go War on Easter!!! Kill the Wabbit!
Comment by SKdeA
Wow. So you survived and dressed well. Heh.
I love Yosemite. Last time I was there it was packed, until bears came into the campsite overnight. Then we found out who the real campers were — the ones who stayed.
Remind me of what I should google to find your group, if you don’t mind. I’d like to bookmark the site.
March 8th, 2007 at 9:20 pmSee if you and others would have listen to air america than they would still be around and have ratings.
Comment by phil
If you notice Anns ratings, nor Air America didn’t help the Republicans maintain the house or senate.
Care to rationalize that?
March 8th, 2007 at 9:21 pmI can assure you they won’t think its funny as they pound the bejeebies out of you.
Comment by AckSyn JAckSyn
….and take pictures. :)
March 8th, 2007 at 9:22 pmSee if you and others would have listen to air america than they would still be around and have ratings.
Comment by phil
Idiot. Air America doesn’t reach every corner of the universe.
March 8th, 2007 at 9:22 pmLooking at their ratings they don’t reach anywhere!!
March 8th, 2007 at 9:26 pmPhil, perhaps you should join Michael at the bar as he parrots Anns vulgarity, he’s probably gonna need some help.
March 8th, 2007 at 9:27 pm….and take pictures. :)
Comment by Zooey
All we would see is ass and elbows as Michael runs away.
March 8th, 2007 at 9:28 pmSee if you and others would have listen to air america than they would still be around and have ratings.
Comment by phil
Um…hate to break it to you but they are on right now. They are still around.
March 8th, 2007 at 9:29 pmLooking at their ratings they don’t reach anywhere!!
Comment by phil
lemme see, Air Americas ratings are low and Democrats win while Ann’s ratings were higher and the Republicans lost.
Your a genius phil, really.
March 8th, 2007 at 9:29 pmlemme see, Air Americas ratings are low and Democrats win while Ann’s ratings were higher and the Republicans lost.
Your a genius phil, really.
Comment by AckSyn JAckSyn
Ouch.
Phil’s gonna sprain something if he tries to think about that.
March 8th, 2007 at 9:31 pmPhil’s gonna sprain something if he tries to think about that.
Comment by Zooey
Heh.
March 8th, 2007 at 9:33 pmYeah with all the spinning going on in here.Dems win but theres no liberal media explain that.
March 8th, 2007 at 9:35 pmPhil, I know this may come as a surprise to you, but I talk to my neighbors, many are Conservative, and even they are tired of such antics. They tell me Ann was wrong. Ann has started to hurt the conservative movement and not help it. Fads come and go and the hate speak methodology of the GOP has met it’s end.
March 8th, 2007 at 9:37 pmI’d just like the BUSHITE/COULTERITE Phil
…to understand that…
…Liberal Progresives don’t need/have radio gods…
…to give us daily messages to live by and propaganda to spew forth…
…when I’m in my vehicle I’m either listening to music cds…
…OR
…the local or satellite (radio) MUSIC station(s)…
…I don’t need to be politically indoctrinated while riding in my car…
…I prefer to be entertained…
March 8th, 2007 at 9:38 pmYeah with all the spinning going on in here.Dems win but theres no liberal media explain that.
Comment by phil
Most media people consider themselves centrists.
March 8th, 2007 at 9:38 pmYeah with all the spinning going on in here.Dems win but theres no liberal media explain that.
Comment by phil.
Define your, and not Anns, version of liberal.
March 8th, 2007 at 9:39 pmIf there is any justice in the universe, she’ll be struck dumb – or inflicted with turrets syndrome.
March 8th, 2007 at 9:41 pmYeah with all the spinning going on in here.Dems win but theres no liberal media explain that.
Comment by phil
You’re kind of dumb, aren’t you phil?
Maybe in philWorld people need to be led around by the nose, and the media. But most real people have eyes and ears, and the ability to form a complete sentence, and can actually form opinions of their own.
I know — Wow.
March 8th, 2007 at 9:45 pmI’m still waiting for those Air America and Bill Maher quotes.
March 8th, 2007 at 9:45 pmphil sez:
That’s your argument? Seriously? The Dems’ victory in November proves the existence of the ‘liberal media’???
That’s easily the dumbest thing I’ve heard all week, phil. Congrats.
March 8th, 2007 at 9:45 pmDefine your, and not Anns, version of liberal.
Comment by AckSyn JAckSyn
Now he’s gonna pop a vein….
March 8th, 2007 at 9:46 pmI don’t care for big government, nor do many conservatives, such as drown it in a bathtub Norquist, but the fact is Goverment has increased 35% under the ‘used to be fiscal’ Conservatives.
This is why I find todays Conservatism an hypocrisy, Pork Barrel spending shot thru the roof, this war will cost trillions of dollars, none of that is conservative, and this is why I agree more today with the Democrats and not because of lifestyles that the pundits try to link to political ideology. I am religious and God has nothing to do with my political thinking nor with sexual preferences as many pundits try to infer.
March 8th, 2007 at 9:49 pmNow he’s gonna pop a vein….
Comment by Zooey
Heh. Critical thinking isn’t as easy as it sounds =)
March 8th, 2007 at 9:50 pm#84 Smack
Are you sure she does not already have tourettes?
March 8th, 2007 at 9:53 pm#78 phil
It’s over, Phil. The GOP has been in a tailspin for the past year or so and it’s just not going to help you guys to come over here and type out your tired old talking points. People aren’t dumb enough to buy that stuff. That’s why Fox is losing viewers and MSNBC, Countdown in particular, is gaining. The problem for Fox is that, if you refuse to do stories about investigations of Republicans, indictments of Republicans, convictions of Republicans, and sentencing of Republicans, you’re left with having to run stuff about Anna Nicole Smith and O.J.
Let us know how that “War on the Easter Bunny” bit turns out. You’d better hope it does better than the “War on Christmas”. That one blew chunks.
March 8th, 2007 at 9:54 pmAnd that, Phil, my friend, is how you have let words, by pedants, frame your thinking. Ann called Edwards a Fag because she knows people will relate, mentally, one with another.
I will not be framed by some person on the sparkle box.
March 8th, 2007 at 9:54 pmphil,
You make all the Phils from all over America so sad. That’s not the kind of Phil I want to be when I grow up. Time to go eat cookies and drink milk to ease the pain.
Cruel World!
March 8th, 2007 at 10:02 pmAckSyn JAckSyn,
I think phil popped that vein….
March 8th, 2007 at 10:04 pmhate to be mean, so this isn’t mean, if it sounds mean, sorry…
but phil sounds – reads – drunk…
don’t drink and blog!
Comment by katy — March 8, 2007 @ 9:09 pm
Could be a redneck. Probably not wearing a shirt. And living in a trailer in one of the southern states. Maybe he was on cops before. Or maybe he’s just stupid.
March 8th, 2007 at 10:06 pmI am kinda new here and to blogging in general. About these conservative commenters here—– Are they trying to copy our president’s language skills? Is English not their first language? They dropped out of school after kindergarten? They are proof “No Child Left Behind” is a failure? They fit the medical dictionary’s definition of moron?
I thought they were just bad typists at first, but after writing “thier” twenty-five straight times—WTF?
When they claim to know everything about every society in the history of the world—this requires a lot of reading. They should know that “there” is not possessive.
And calling someone a faggot is not the height of humor.
March 8th, 2007 at 10:09 pmYou nutty libs are pathetic. All the time looking for a reason to be offended. How long before some bedwetter files a lawsuit? Grow a backbone for crying out loud. Sheesh.
March 8th, 2007 at 10:13 pmAckSyn JAckSyn,
I think phil popped that vein….
Comment by Zooey
Mwah.
I don’t want to appear mean spirited, I hope I don’t come off that way.
But people today just don’t seem to use their noggin for anything more than watching TV and having their opinions spoonfed to them.
Phil, I like you, I really do. Please don’t feel that this is personal, it isn’t.
March 8th, 2007 at 10:16 pmAll the time looking for a reason to be offended
I am not offended, it is you who should be offended that Ann is harming your movement. Is calling someone a fag, who isn’t, debate on any level?
March 8th, 2007 at 10:17 pmWhat, Stubain, did Ann truly accomplish other than having her column removed from 5 papers?
That she can still do schoolyard taunts?
March 8th, 2007 at 10:19 pmI thought they were just bad typists at first, but after writing “thier†twenty-five straight times—WTF?
Comment by keith — March 8, 2007 @ 10:09 pm
hey, that’s progress, actually… they usually spell it “there”…
March 8th, 2007 at 10:19 pmeven if it means “they are”…
Perhaps, The Onion can pick up Mann’s slack – but then, she may not be up to their standards.
March 8th, 2007 at 10:21 pmI thought they were just bad typists at first, but after writing “thier†twenty-five straight times—WTF?
Comment by keith
I do that sometimes myself, I admit. Mental block I spose something to do with ownership.
Mine and theres.
March 8th, 2007 at 10:26 pmBut thats neither here nor their.
March 8th, 2007 at 10:27 pmI don’t want to appear mean spirited, I hope I don’t come off that way.
Comment by AckSyn JAckSyn
Not at all. I just mean he’s gone. :)
March 8th, 2007 at 10:27 pmConsidering the size of her mouth, Ann really isn’t carried by that many papers. Even my redneck town doesn’t cover her…
I think this could validate the point about why it’s important to give her publicity on these types of comments. ALL publicity is not necessarily good publicity – especially when you’re a hate-monger…
March 8th, 2007 at 10:28 pmGrow a backbone for crying out loud. Sheesh.
Comment by Stubain
I’ll try, c*cksucker.
March 8th, 2007 at 10:28 pmSeriously Though…You don’t think we’re getting close to a ‘double standard’, attempting to eliminate Ann Coulter’s crap from media, while at the same time decrying any attempt to do the same from the Dixie Chicks?
Thinkprogress from last year
As much couching as we can do saying ‘while I agree Ann has a right to free speech…’, we’re still opening ourselves up to at least a little bit of hypocrisy when taking the step to blacklist her off paper circulation.
IMO
March 8th, 2007 at 10:30 pmNot at all. I just mean he’s gone. :)
Aww man just when were debaiting =)
March 8th, 2007 at 10:31 pmBut thats neither here nor their.
Comment by AckSyn JAckSyn
Now you’re doing it on purpose. :)
You’re on quite the roll this evening, I must say. Heh.
March 8th, 2007 at 10:31 pmComment by keith — March 8, 2007 @ 10:09 pm
Welcome to Think Progress.
Well said… We all make typos or transpose letters or substitute similar sounding words for one another on occasion – especially when the exchanges are fast and furious – but when someone continues to misspell basic words over and over, claims to know everything inspite of their refusal to actually read anything non-fictional, you really have to wonder…
March 8th, 2007 at 10:32 pmTackle that trannie bitch and pile on. With luck, maybe she will frag herself.
March 8th, 2007 at 10:35 pmmandolin; you are one totally sick f*ck.
March 8th, 2007 at 10:36 pmAs much couching as we can do saying ‘while I agree Ann has a right to free speech…’,
She certainly has a right to free speech but this isn’t so much about free speech as it is about lying. To call someone something they aren’t is not truthful. We teach our children to tell the truth. Ann knows better. It is deceitful.
March 8th, 2007 at 10:40 pmYou’re on quite the roll this evening, I must say. Heh.
Comment by Zooey
Drinking and blogging aint such a bad thang after all. =)
March 8th, 2007 at 10:41 pmComment by Hello…#108
HUGE differences Hello,
We (Liberal Progressives) have never been “FANS” of the Coultergeist…
…Dixie Chicks’ supposed “fans” turned against them…
…because the Chicks disagreed with their fans…
…those fans tried to destroy them…
Happily though it backfired, and the Chicks gained a whole new fan base…
…because the Chicks were/are on the humanitarian, patriotic, and morally veracious side of this political Civil War…
…Coulter’s just a despicable, mean-spirited, greedy profiteering TROGLODYTE BI*ch…
…with no redeeming value…
March 8th, 2007 at 10:42 pmmandolin; you are one totally sick f*ck.
Comment by Uncle Ho
Oh good, I’m not the only potty mouth here tonight. :)
March 8th, 2007 at 10:42 pmI was waiting for responses at “RSS Feed” and got nothing. Now I see them here.
March 8th, 2007 at 10:43 pmDrinking and blogging aint such a bad thang after all. =)
Comment by AckSyn JAckSyn
Oy, it would be for me. I’m drinking lemon tea. Strong. :-D
March 8th, 2007 at 10:43 pmTackle that trannie bitch and pile on. With luck, maybe she will frag herself.
Comment by Uncle Ho
That is a visual that could cause one nightmares Unk.
March 8th, 2007 at 10:45 pmOy, it would be for me. I’m drinking lemon tea. Strong. :-D
Comment by Zooey
Cheers!
March 8th, 2007 at 10:47 pmI was waiting for responses at “RSS Feed†and got nothing. Now I see them here.
Comment by keith
Sorry keith, that’s been there forever, but I have no idea what it is. You’ll find us here — whether you want to or not. :)
Like unbelievable said — Welcome!
March 8th, 2007 at 10:47 pmCheers!
Comment by AckSyn JAckSyn
I already say enough stuff to embarrass myself. :)
March 8th, 2007 at 10:51 pmHiya Zooey; can’t help it, time in the bush as a boonie rat did it.
quick hi/bye tonight. was burning a cd(same one/2 copies, one each for home and office). and could not resist playing music from my files. so I’m late to the threads tonight and making only a cameo appearance.
March 8th, 2007 at 10:51 pmDrinking and blogging aint such a bad thang after all. =)
Comment by AckSyn JAckSyn — March 8, 2007 @ 10:41 pm
just so you don’t go “sounding” like that phil… so far so good! :-)
March 8th, 2007 at 10:53 pmGreat to see you as always, Uncle Ho.
I don’t have as good an excuse as you for my potty mouth. I just like cussing. :)
March 8th, 2007 at 10:55 pmYou heard the one about a guest at the same CPAC convention (Ann posed with him) and on O’Reilly, and on Hannity&C is an ex gay porn star ?!!
March 8th, 2007 at 10:56 pmI already say enough stuff to embarrass myself. :)
Comment by Zooey
I bet you’d be a hoot if you did!
March 8th, 2007 at 10:58 pmNot that thiere’s anything wrong with that!
March 8th, 2007 at 11:00 pm#127 – keith
Here’s the link to the TP story about the guy — before we knew he was multi-talented.
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/28/alva-dont-ask/
March 8th, 2007 at 11:01 pmJust so you don’t go “sounding†like that phil… so far so good! :-)
Jes lemme know If I do so I can depart with what little respect I have garnered.
March 8th, 2007 at 11:02 pmI just like cussing. :)
Comment by Zooey — March 8, 2007 @ 10:55 pm
Me too… My students think it’s funny when I tell them ‘Hey – pick that shit up off my clean floor’ or ‘Get your ass over here and get to work’… Hell, it’s just silly words… Better than hate speech or degrading things others say who will write them up for saying “shizznit” (I swear, the Jesus Freak at my school wrote an 18 year old up for “shizznit”)… And then he wonders why I don’t have discipline problems and he has too many… Crazy Conservatives…
March 8th, 2007 at 11:02 pmI bet you’d be a hoot if you did!
Comment by AckSyn JAckSyn
I’m a cheap drunk (one or two drinks, tops), but a fun one. Too many drunks in my family, so I don’t tempt fate. :P
March 8th, 2007 at 11:03 pmZooey; do what you like. : ) btw, the cd I put together was some of my favorites from 1968. Tighten Up, Hush, the Weight, Stoned Soul Picnic, Bungalow Bill, All Along the Watchtower are among the selections.
2300 & time to go. g’night
March 8th, 2007 at 11:03 pmI just like cussing. :)
I think I cussed my cussbox out years ago working with a bunch of cussing folks in construction etc.
March 8th, 2007 at 11:05 pmCool tunes, Uncle Ho. Why am I not surprised?
Goodnight!
March 8th, 2007 at 11:05 pmHey UB, your an Architect right? I was thinking would it be possible to build a generator/impeller that worked off the draft found in tall buildings?
March 8th, 2007 at 11:08 pmBungalow Bill
I haven’t heard that song in ages!
Hey their (heh) Bungalow Bill!
March 8th, 2007 at 11:09 pmI was thinking if we harness the wind for power generation why can’t we harness an updraft…
March 8th, 2007 at 11:10 pmZooey,
No, that link is a totally different story. He’s not Alva. He’s Matt Sanchez.
Go here for a good laugh at the Cons celebrating a gay porn star:
http://joemygod.blogspot.com/2007/03/jeff-gannon-redux.html
March 8th, 2007 at 11:10 pmNice! I want to see Ann (Crank Skank) Coulter fall flat on her pale flat ass! Hit the ground hard!!!! Make it hurt Trannie Annie can handle it!!!
March 8th, 2007 at 11:14 pmGo here for a good laugh at the Cons celebrating a gay porn star:
Yeh I read that earlier today from a link posted by V V F U.
I see a whole new spin cycle in our not too distant future if the media takes off with that story.
March 8th, 2007 at 11:17 pmNo, that link is a totally different story. He’s not Alva. He’s Matt Sanchez.
Comment by keith
Oops, I thought that was the story.
I should start drinking….
March 8th, 2007 at 11:18 pmSpeaking of new spin — new thread above — Malkin. Ugh.
March 8th, 2007 at 11:19 pmI should think that Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert would love the story. I left messages at their network’s site.
Did you notice the story I linked said he “has had a LENGTHY career in gay porn” ?!
March 8th, 2007 at 11:21 pmI think fer popularity is growing actually. My fiance isn’t even in to politics and she asked the other day if we could go see Ann speak somewhere.
My god, you sicko, stop trolling for wives at the group home!!!
March 8th, 2007 at 11:30 pmDid you notice the story I linked said he “has had a LENGTHY career in gay porn†?!
Comment by keith
I wish I had the stomach to investigate. :P
March 8th, 2007 at 11:30 pmAnn Coulter-GEIST—-YOU ARE THE WEAKEST LINK! GOOD-BYE!!!!!
March 8th, 2007 at 11:32 pm“Ahhhh michael, the debate chickenshit.
Comment by Zooey — March 8, 2007 @ 8:59 pm”
I’m here for a while zooey. Want to test your skills
March 8th, 2007 at 11:43 pmLOL, right Mikey. Would that be with nobody watching?
March 8th, 2007 at 11:46 pm“Yes, Michael Anns getting dropped from newspapers is good press. And your welcome that Ann will have less people reading her childish taunts.
Say Michael, would you want your kids to talk like Ann?
Comment by AckSyn JAckSyn — March 8, 2007 @ 9:01 pm”
She has been dropped by about 5 out of 100 newspapers but how many will pick her up? You don’t have to read her weekly article in newspapers, it’s on her website, Drudge, Newsmax, etc. How many people read them there? I always get her weeklies on her website. 5 papers dropping her is not going to do anything. It just gives her more publicity! Would I want my kids to talk like Ann? You bet! I admire her! You liberals can’t get over the fact that she was one of the lawyers that brought down the felon Clinton!
March 8th, 2007 at 11:49 pm“She is clearly not a trustworthy source of opinion
Thank you very much,
Paul E. Jackson
Comment by Paul Jackson — March 8, 2007 @ 9:12 pm”
Of course she’s not to you because you don’t like what she has to say but she is to millions of Americans!
March 8th, 2007 at 11:52 pmSo, Mikey, you are a fan of a hateful, bigotted skank. Thanks for clarifying EVERYTHING for us.
March 8th, 2007 at 11:52 pmClinton was NOT brought down. He was found NOT guilty. He is NOT a felon. Did you NOT know that?
There should never have been an impeachment, because getting a bj is not a constitutional question.
March 8th, 2007 at 11:54 pm“Hey Michael I have a great idea, go out to a country western bar and start calling people you know nothing about fags. ya know imitate Ann, and see what happens.
I can assure you they won’t think its funny as they pound the bejeebies out of you.
Comment by AckSyn JAckSyn — March 8, 2007 @ 9:16 pm”
Is that the best way you can debate her? Can’t you at least try to use some intelligence?
March 8th, 2007 at 11:54 pm“I can assure you they won’t think its funny as they pound the bejeebies out of you.
Comment by AckSyn JAckSyn
….and take pictures. :)
Comment by Zooey — March 8, 2007 @ 9:22 pm”
zooey, I’m waiting?
March 8th, 2007 at 11:55 pmWhich is worse—using the prosecutors definition of “sexual relation” or lying us into an illegal war that costs 658,000 lives, $2.3 TRILLION, and harmed our national security?
March 8th, 2007 at 11:57 pm“So, Mikey, you are a fan of a hateful, bigotted skank. Thanks for clarifying EVERYTHING for us.
Comment by JPark — March 8, 2007 @ 11:52 pm”
No, I didn’t say I was a fan of yours, I said I was a fan of a brilliant Constitutional attorney who helped get the pervert Clinton impeached!
March 8th, 2007 at 11:58 pm#158 That is the best you’ve got? Zooey would eat you alive…and not in a good way.
March 8th, 2007 at 11:59 pm#158 Heh, brilliant. You really do have a low standard.
March 9th, 2007 at 12:00 amNow he’s a “pervert” ?
I guess Eisenhower was a “Pervert” because it is well known he had an affair with his chauffer?
How about Henry Hyde and Robert Livingstone? Gingrich, Guliani, Reagan, GHWB?
March 9th, 2007 at 12:01 amWas our current president a virgin at the age of 35? If not, then he had sex outside of marriage !! What a pervert!!
March 9th, 2007 at 12:03 am“Clinton was NOT brought down. He was found NOT guilty. He is NOT a felon. Did you NOT know that?
There should never have been an impeachment, because getting a bj is not a constitutional question.
Comment by keith — March 8, 2007 @ 11:54 pm”
Clinton lied under oath to a Grand Jury and was impeached by the House of Representatives. As a result he lost his law license in the state of Arkansas. The Senate didn’t have the guts to remove him from office!
March 9th, 2007 at 12:03 am“Now he’s a “pervert†?
I guess Eisenhower was a “Pervert†because it is well known he had an affair with his chauffer?
How about Henry Hyde and Robert Livingstone? Gingrich, Guliani, Reagan, GHWB?
Comment by keith — March 9, 2007 @ 12:01 am”
What does any of this have to do with them? Changing the subject? Maybe you’re a pervert? How about staying on topic?
March 9th, 2007 at 12:05 am“Was our current president a virgin at the age of 35? If not, then he had sex outside of marriage !! What a pervert!!
Comment by keith — March 9, 2007 @ 12:03 am”
Grow up and stay on topic?
March 9th, 2007 at 12:06 am“Zooey would eat you alive…and not in a good way.
Comment by JPark — March 8, 2007 @ 11:59 pm”
I’m waiting, put I’m sure she’s hiding! I’ve been down this road with her before. Whenever I challenge her she conveniently slips off to bed!
March 9th, 2007 at 12:08 amHe did NOT lie under oath. That is why he was found NOT guilty in the impeachment trial. He did NOT lie because he used the prosecuter’s definition of “sexual relations” (which did not include what he and Monica did). Need I draw you a picture?
What does pointing out that those condemning Clinton and leading the impeachment were themselves adulterers? You are really asking me that?
You didn’t answer the question of which is more important: a bj versus lying us into an illegal war costing 658,000 lives, $2.3 TRILLION, and harming our national security?
March 9th, 2007 at 12:11 amKeep on with your idiotic talking points Mikey. I am sure she will someday think that you are worth debating.
March 9th, 2007 at 12:11 am“Which is worse—using the prosecutors definition of “sexual relation†or lying us into an illegal war that costs 658,000 lives, $2.3 TRILLION, and harmed our national security?
Comment by keith — March 8, 2007 @ 11:57 pm”
Keith, do you really enjoy making yourself look stupid? What lie did W make to get us into this war? Be real specific and back it up? 658,000 lives? Where in the world did you get that figure from? The real figure is between 50 – 60 thousand. Would you like a link? Can you read?
March 9th, 2007 at 12:12 am#165 When did you become a stickler for staying on topic? Seems like a recent development.
March 9th, 2007 at 12:12 am#169 Yeah, what lie??? Mikey, you just make yourself look even more stupid with each passing post.
March 9th, 2007 at 12:13 am“He did NOT lie under oath. That is why he was found NOT guilty in the impeachment trial. He did NOT lie because he used the prosecuter’s definition of “sexual relations†(which did not include what he and Monica did). Need I draw you a picture?
What does pointing out that those condemning Clinton and leading the impeachment were themselves adulterers? You are really asking me that?
You didn’t answer the question of which is more important: a bj versus lying us into an illegal war costing 658,000 lives, $2.3 TRILLION, and harming our national security?
Comment by keith — March 9, 2007 @ 12:11 am”
Were you living on Mars during the trial? He was impeached by the US House of Representatives but was not removed from office by the Senate. Is this revisionist history being taught in your high school?
March 9th, 2007 at 12:16 amI wonder how what percentage of people who buy Ann Coulters books can actually read?
March 9th, 2007 at 12:19 amProbably not too many. That would explain some book sales. The other is that she’s on reading lists and students are forced to get a copy.
Now there ought to be a law against that–if they weren’t in college it would be child abuse.
“#169 Yeah, what lie??? Mikey, you just make yourself look even more stupid with each passing post.
Comment by JPark — March 9, 2007 @ 12:13 am”
No jpark, your the one who looks stupid. I asked a simple question which you can’t answer. Tell us what verifiable lie W told the American people to get us into this war?
March 9th, 2007 at 12:19 amLies:
from whitehouse.gov January 28, 2003:
“30,000 munitions capable of delivering chemical agents”…”25,000 liters of anthrax — enough doses to kill several million people”….”500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent”…..”materials sufficient to produce more than 38,000 liters of botulinum toxin “……”several mobile biological weapons labs”….”Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa”…..”high-strength aluminum tubes suitable for nuclear weapons production”….
the drones
the shack in the north
ready to launch in 15 minutes
the meeting in Prague
the urgent threat
the ties to al Qaeda
The majority of our troops were led to believe that Saddam was at least partly responsible for 9/11.
Is all of the above not as serious as using the prosecutor’s definition of sexual relations? You are not answering the question.
March 9th, 2007 at 12:20 am“I wonder how what percentage of people who buy Ann Coulters books can actually read?
Probably not too many. That would explain some book sales. The other is that she’s on reading lists and students are forced to get a copy.
Now there ought to be a law against that–if they weren’t in college it would be child abuse.
Comment by Shane — March 9, 2007 @ 12:19 am”
First of all your first statement is pretty stupid! There are hundreds of thousand of her books sold, are you insulting all these people? Students are forced to get a copy? Name ONE?
March 9th, 2007 at 12:21 amImpeachment does not mean you are guilty of anything—it just means there will be a trial. Yes the trial was held in the Senate. Very Good. They found him not guilty for the reason I keep stating.
March 9th, 2007 at 12:22 am“from whitehouse.gov January 28, 2003:
“30,000 munitions capable of delivering chemical agentsâ€â€¦â€25,000 liters of anthrax — enough doses to kill several million peopleâ€â€¦.â€500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agentâ€â€¦..â€materials sufficient to produce more than 38,000 liters of botulinum toxin “……â€several mobile biological weapons labsâ€â€¦.â€Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africaâ€â€¦..â€high-strength aluminum tubes suitable for nuclear weapons productionâ€â€¦.
Comment by keith — March 9, 2007 @ 12:20 am”
There were many people on both sides of the aisle who believed they had these weapons. I asked you to produce verifiable lies that W went out of his way to get us into this war and you CAN’T!
March 9th, 2007 at 12:25 amHitler sold many thousands of books too. Therefore, by your logic, noone has a right to object to anything he said or to where his conservative movement led .
March 9th, 2007 at 12:25 am“Impeachment does not mean you are guilty of anything—it just means there will be a trial. Yes the trial was held in the Senate. Very Good. They found him not guilty for the reason I keep stating.
Comment by keith — March 9, 2007 @ 12:22 am”
Granted, I’ve admitted they found him not guilty, but the US House of Representatives impeached him for lying to the Grand Jury under oath in the Paula Jones hearing which she received $750,000 from Clinton to go away. He then lost his license to practice law.
March 9th, 2007 at 12:28 amHave you been following the Libby conviction? It was well known by Cheney’s office that the Niger documents were extremely poor forgeries 12 months before Bush used them in the State of the Union Speech as one of the reasons for the urgency of the invasion.
They were probably forged by Feith, Ledeen, and Italian intelligence.
March 9th, 2007 at 12:29 am#174 No, Mikey, everybody knows Bush lied about WMD and Saddam’s “connection” to the 9-11 hijackers. Only morons like you and your fellow Fox viewers buy that there were no lies. I pity you for being so stupid.
March 9th, 2007 at 12:30 amIf some Dems fell for the lies—–that is not proof that what was said was true. You’re having trouble with this concept, aren’t you?
March 9th, 2007 at 12:30 amYou still don’t get the concept that impeachment just means there is reason for a trial (in the Senate) and does not say he is guilty of anything.
He did not lie under oath for the reason I keep stating. I can only state it. I cannot understand it for you.
He should never have been forced to testify at all about something that has nothing to do with the office of the presidency nor the constitution.
Everyone leading and calling for the impeachment were also adulterers and you think that is a change of subject.
March 9th, 2007 at 12:34 amHell, I’d pay Paula Jones $750,000 to leave me alone, too.
March 9th, 2007 at 12:36 amSince you are so hung up on a bj—- WHY DON’T YOU GROW UP!!!
March 9th, 2007 at 12:36 amWhich is more important–a bj or the loss of 658,000 human beings, $2.3 TRILLION, and our national security? Because according to the 16 intelligence agencies of the USA, this war has harmed our national security.
March 9th, 2007 at 12:42 amThere were many people on both sides of the aisle who believed they had these weapons. I asked you to produce verifiable lies that W went out of his way to get us into this war and you CAN’T!
Comment by michael — March 9, 2007 @ 12:25 am
Yes, but only people from your side of the aisle were *fabricating* the evidence to support this.
Your *evidence* of the effort is well documented in Feith, Cheney and every other Lying sack of sh*t that derailed the intelligence process. You’re a fcuking cowardly old c*nt – dum bass.
March 9th, 2007 at 12:48 amDo you think Libby would commit perjury and obstruction of justice over and over and over again for something that was trivial? The story behind the Libby story is extremely important. It is about people from the White House forging the “Niger Documents”.
March 9th, 2007 at 12:52 amIs that the best way you can debate her? Can’t you at least try to use some intelligence?
Comment by michael
Calling someone a fag who isn’t is intelligent King question mark?
March 9th, 2007 at 2:24 amAny well hung males in here for itsy bitsy betty?
March 9th, 2007 at 3:44 amMy fiance isn’t even in to politics and she asked the other day if we could go see Ann speak somewhere.
Comment by mandolin — March 8, 2007 @ 7:45 pm
Just a note: fiancé (with accent, you ignorant), it’s a HE. The feminine version of the word is fiancée. That hapens very often in French (the horrors) words with a genre.
But probably you knew it. Being a fan of Ann Coulter, there’s not a surprise in knowing that your girlfriend is a HE.
Just saying.
March 9th, 2007 at 8:49 amAnn isn’t capable of debate Michael she simply says some really dumb things hoping it appears to look like debate when it is nothing but schoolyard taunts (which she admitted to) and repeating the same old Clinton and Kennedy talking points for the last 8 years. Most of what Anne says has been debunked yet, like propaganda, she keeps repeating it hoping you will believe it. (it becomes true to dolts)
March 9th, 2007 at 10:46 am#4 Gary Gilmore had a lot of fans show up for his execution, too.
In fact, a lot of terrible people have fans – doesn’t mean they’re not terrible people.
I like it that the “invisible hand of the free market” is exactly what’s bringing (m)Ann’s gravy train to a screeching halt.
March 9th, 2007 at 12:04 pm(…she sure attracts the very least intelligent, most-likely-to-end-up-on America’s-Most-Wanted brand of Trolls…..maybe another of her mouthbrather minions will go off and do a heinous crime, and we can put her on trial like Charlie Manson)
March 9th, 2007 at 12:07 pm#4 & 5:
An Coulter is really under your skin. Must be triggering some complex or you wouldn’t be reacting with such a high girly voice. Do you think for a minute that any of your shrillness upsets Coulter? Her fans are rooting her on and you will help her to sell her books.
Comment by Bradway Bennett — March 8, 2007 @ 7:43 pm
Hmmm, I tot this was all about getting the troops out; saving more unnecessarily wasted trillions; avoiding another bloody sacrifice of our boys by not attacking Iran, and getting away from another nation’s civil war? I guess I sense a Carl-Rove-like public opinion twisting and manipulative style here again. Something like this:
Get a stupid bimbo with big tits and sexy figure in the focus. Let her do the talking. Miss Rice is just too f***ken hideous, and the boys hate her comment. They need someone to give them the hard-on, and use her sexy talents to argue, and make them believe that we never lost the war. That the neocons and the rubbish in the WhiteHouse are the reel things.
Its all like the shit that happens while having a phone-sex. But this time, its the media little porn-like propaganda. It would have actually worked if Babara Bush and Condi Rice, and Cheney have long sexy legs and big asses, and wonderful racks, most Americans would have never criticized them. Poor American soldiers, more and more to die, while the media keep their cameras focused on Coutler’s lips, hips and ducktailing ass. Maybe the pain & diversion would have been worth it if she’s worth 0000.000001% of the attention the media’s giving her. Anyway, a little piece of advice to the dolts in the WhiteHouse, maybe they outta sack the SnowMan, and give his job to someone like Pamela Anderson, Im very very sure her comments and appearance would pull enough attention. Would it?
March 10th, 2007 at 4:44 amWhat a pathetic administration.